Disney’s latest Star Wars cash grab has a huge gap between the critical reception (92%) and audience reviews (52%) on Rotten Tomatoes. It’s also bombing at the box office relative to previous releases.

According to Jews, this is part of an evil alt-right conspiracy.

You see, it can’t be that professional reviewers working for mainstream Judenpress are cherry-picked for their ideology or corrupt assholes frightened by Disney’s clout as an advertiser. Instead, the disconnect between reviewer and audience is the product of Neo-Nazi bots!

The paranoid fake news kike Drew Schwarz amplified (((Matthew Jacobs’))) Huffington Blog entry making these claims and the rest of the MSM picked it up from there.

Vice:

Critics seem to love The Last Jedi, and it’s raking in cash hand over fist at the box office. But for a movie that’s apparently obscenely popular, it’s facing some pretty serious backlash from viewers—as of Thursday, its audience score on Rotten Tomatoes weighed in at 54 percent. So what gives?

According to the Huffington Post, a fringe alt-right group might be to blame. Some anonymous troll behind the Facebook group “Down With Disney’s Treatment of Franchises and its Fanboys” told HuffPo he dispatched an army of bots to flood The Last Jedi’s Rotten Tomatoes page with negative reviews. The moderator—who self-identifies as alt-right—said he went after the movie for its “feminist agenda,” arguing that Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) is a “victim of the anti-mansplaining movement,” Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) is somehow being “turn[ed] gay,” and that there are too many women featured in the film.

“I’m sick and tired of men being portrayed as idiots,” the moderator told HuffPo. “There was a time we ruled society and I want to see that again. That is why I voted for Donald Trump.”

In a Facebook post, the moderator took sole credit for The Last Jedi’s low audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes, claiming that his bots “rigged this score and still keep it dropping.” But as the review aggregator tells it, that’s a load of bunk. A representative from the site told HuffPo that if an army of bots were shitposting on The Last Jedi’s page, Rotten Tomatoes would’ve noticed.

“As a course of regular business, we have a team of security, network, social, [and] database experts who monitor all of our platforms and they haven’t seen any unusual activity,” the rep said.

So in other words, Schwarz knows this isn’t true, but you don’t get the truth until the bottom 1/4 of the article. This is the formula used by the Judenpress to lie, as they know their easy-to-gaslight readers don’t look past the title and a few paragraphs.

Any time you see a massive difference between (((critical reception))) and audience reception, it’s because there is a political factor at play.

Both Fight Club and Conan the Barbarian were revolutionary works of art when they first came out. Jew-enabled cultural Marxists like Roger Ebert gave them low reviews solely because he didn’t like exactly what resonated with the audience: the message. He famously ignored much of Fight Club’s artistic merits because of its quasi-Fascist characters.

Today on Rotten Tomatoes, we see the “professional” movie reviewers in lab coats gave Fight Club an average rating of 70%, while the audience rates it 96%!

The audience is indeed offended by the Tumblrfication of Star Wars under the expanding ear shadow of Moshe Rat Inc., but that’s just one of the many stink lines coming out of this film can.

Let’s see how all-encompassing the Alt-Right conspiracy is when the film premieres in China on January 5th and they find out the negro character’s love interest is an Asian girl.

Only 21,307? We won’t have true equality until all our politicians are sexual deviants.

I think there is a resurgence of populism because at this point in time America has not yet learned how to be homosexual. And I think trannies are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. America is not going to be the straight-cis society it once was in the last century. Perverts are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for America to make. They are now going into GRIDS mode and trannies will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, America will not survive.

Daily Beast:

LGBT candidates won big on election night 2017, with an unprecedented flurry of wins for transgender candidates in particular.

But according to a new report from the Victory Institute, which works to elect LGBT people to public office, political parity is a long way away: 21,307 seats away, to be exact.

Only then will the percentage of LGBT elected officials line up with the 4 percent of American adults who identify as LGBT, according to a recent Gallup estimate.

So you’re saying “LGBT” people can’t be represented by people who aren’t “LGBT,” huh?

That’s an interesting position. Along the same logic, I’m sure you’d agree that Black people can’t be adequately represented by White politicians. I would agree with that as well.

Mexicans can also only be represented by Mexican politicians, and the important work they do.

But why is that, though?

Could it be that different groups have different, incompatible and thus competing interests?

The most striking finding in the Victory Institute report is that only 0.1 percent of elected officials are LGBT. That means there would need to be nearly 50 times more openly LGBT elected officials—including three more senators, 12 more members of the House of Representatives, and over 21,000 other officials—before federal, state, and local governments fully reflect the population.

The report, released today, provides the most comprehensive overview to date of LGBT political representation in the United States, from the Senate all the way down to the local level.

Previously, the Victory Institute has given an offhand estimate that there are “about 500” LGBT elected officials in the United States. Now, they have a more exact number: 448, which includes Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin, six members of the House of Representatives, 109 state legislators, two state executives, and one large-city mayor, with the remainder spread across various local offices.

This whole drive to get “minorities” elected demonstrates how insane this whole notion of “multicultural democracy” really is. These people clearly understand that different ethnic and cultural groups have different interests, and that they struggle to get their guys into office in order to promote those interests – at the expense of the interests of others.

Forcing Christians to bake homo cakes is obviously against the interest of conservative Christians.

But then, aren’t White people in the exact same situation? The more of these “minority” politicians are elected, the less the interests of White will be represented. The whole notion that we’ll ever all hold hands and sing kumbaya has always been a scam – and the Jews and liberals know it.

They all know this is heading towards an all-out war of competing interests – they just intend to win it.

Back during the Obama administration, the Department of Justice found that black students were suspended at higher rates than white ones.

The “experts” concluded that the reason for the disparity wasn’t the aloofness of black parents, the fact that blacks are naturally more violent, or the need to develop an educational program that better caters to the intellectual average on the African bell curve. Instead, they felt blacks got in trouble more because of “racism”…period. The solution was to start punishing white students more while not punishing blacks.

The federal government started threatening to withhold funding from schools that punish black students, and now majority-minority schools are even more violent than before.

Teachers in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania – which is 50% black – are now quitting in large numbers because even the kindergarten aged black students are beating them up!

New York Post:

A group of Pennsylvania teachers is sharing horror stories of getting beaten up by pupils as young as 6 — and begging their school district for help.

“I have been kicked, punched, hit, scratched. I’ve had a student physically restraining me in front of my other students… And many of the personal things that I have bought for my classroom have been broken or destroyed,” first-grade teacher Amanda Sheaffer told the Harrisburg School Board at its meeting Monday, according to the news Web site PennLive.

“Many minutes are spent each day dealing with violence that is happening in the classroom,” Sheaffer said. “How am I supposed to have a safe, nurturing learning environment when this behavior happens?”

Sheaffer was one of about a half-dozen elementary-school teachers and several parents who implored the board for help in dealing with increasingly violent and troubled kids.

“We aren’t complaining. We are here begging for help so that we can help those students,” said Harrisburg Education Association President Jody Barksdale.

Barksdale represents some of the teachers asking for help and brought similar concerns to the board in January, according to PennLive.

At least 45 teachers resigned between July and October because of kids terrorizing their classrooms, Barksdale claimed, according to Fox 43.

“Teachers and students are being hit, kicked, slapped, scratched, cussed at…. and observing other students flip over tables, desks and chairs,” she said. “Teachers have had to take the rest of their class into the hallway top protect them during these outbursts. Not much has changed since last January.”

Imagine what the minority of white students at these schools are going through if even the grown ups are helpless. White children are beaten, raped and even murdered every day at schools where blacks and browns outnumber them.

After whites, it’s blacks themselves who suffer the most from policies developed by the Jewish pseudo-scientists in academia. The occasional 1 in 10 black students with enough intelligence to learn loses out because schools have no tools or policies for controlling the nigger savagery of his classmates.

Contrary to popular perception, teaching is actually a decent paying job and they’re always hiring. The problem is (((Randi Weingarten))) and co. make you go through a trial of fire. They will send inexperienced and naive 23-year-old white girls to the most dangerous black schools around, then blame them when the students fail state exams.

Nobody wants to teach in an environment where the students are both unable and unwilling to learn, and especially not when they’re physically attacking you. Most urban black schools are run by Jews, lesbians or disinterested black principals making 6 figures. Hence why a potentially satisfying job with decent benefits has such a massive turnover rate.

Even the most idealistic, diehard white liberal in education will tell you teaching niggers is thankless.

It seems like blacks who commit brazen and high-profile crimes have been walking more and more lately.

The negro who pushed a much older Asian man in front of an incoming train in New York City in front of dozens of witnesses – a scene that was tastelessly photographed and made front page of the Jew York Post – has just been released by a jury.

New York Post:

The homeless man who fatally shoved a drunken Queens father in front of a Q train nearly five years ago was acquitted of all charges Monday.

“I’m thankful for my freedom,” crowed Naeem Davis, 34, after being cleared in Manhattan Supreme Court.

“I knew it would happen eventually,” he told reporters. “If you work and have a job and do the right thing, the law is going to work on your behalf.”

Davis’s acquittal came about a week after his lawyer, Stephen Pokart, told jurors that his client had acted in self-defense against a “deranged and threatening” man, Ki Suck Han.

A freelance Post photographer had captured the moment just before the Q train barreled into the station and crushed Han, an image that made the front page of the newspaper at the time.

Jury forewoman Gretchen Pfeil cried and hugged Davis, 34, as he walked out of court.

“For me, there was a lack of evidence on most of the charges,” she told reporters. “As a jury, I think, the vast majority of us from the beginning of our deliberations believed the prosecution had failed to prove that the defendant was not justified in his actions. And by the end of our deliberations, I believe we were of one mind that he was in fact justified in his actions or at least the prosecution had not convinced us otherwise.”

Pokart told jurors at the murder trial that Davis feared for his life after Han, 58, followed him into the 49th Street Station on Dec. 3, 2012.

“He was simply trying to defuse this combustible situation not brought about by him, but a man who was deranged and threatening,” said Pokart, who represented Davis along with Rachel Levy and Martin LaFalce of the Legal Aid Society.

Davis faced a potential life sentence in the case.

The jury, seven women and five men, began deliberating last Tuesday morning and announced their decision at noon Monday, finding Davis not guilty of second-degree murder, two counts of manslaughter and one count of criminally negligent homicide.

Assistant DA Charles Whitt had conceded that Han “staggering like a zombie, stumbling incoherently” but said that didn’t justify Davis’ extreme reaction.

It is unclear what exactly is propelling this trend. The first reason could be (((judges))) and certain jurors infected with “criminal justice reform” propaganda, which teaches that the massive gap in violent crime rates between blacks and whites must be closed by acquitting more black murderers. Prosecutors and DAs may also do a half-assed job with black criminals for careerist reasons.

To demonstrate what I mean, the Jury forewoman – Gretchen Pfeil – who “cried” and “hugged” this evil bastard – wasn’t even black, but a cat-lady Judeo-Left professor at NYU and the (((New School)))!

The second factor is the “Bronx Jury” mindset. Back in the day, a “Bronx Jury” would as a rule side with the minority in disputes with the police, but nowadays they are overtly lenient (or outright acquit) on any black for any crime against another race. Colin Flaherty talks a lot about this.

Regardless, what probably happened was that a small inebriated 58-year-old Asian guy mistakenly brushed a nigger’s shoulder and it provoked a chimp out.

What is more common, a black starting a fight over some little ego bullshit, or an old 120 lb Asian guy doing that? The self-defense argument is a joke.

But what is most telling isn’t a black doing stupid shit, but the dozens of diverse denizens sitting back watching as this old man desperately tries to crawl up the platform. The only intervention was some soulless Paki filming the incident so he could sell it to some Kike for a tacky front page meme at the New York Post.

And they say we’re the bad guys.

The irony is that if this was a subway platform loaded up with Neo-Nazis, somebody (not necessarily even one of these “Weeabo Nationalists”) would’ve helped Mr. Han up in time.

For minorities, life at the mercy of other non-whites and Jews is a far worse fate than even the most racist white country could ever be.

The black released back into the street by these jurors will violently offend again. As a <80 IQ immigrant from West Africa, he may even assume pushing Asian people in front of moving trains is legal.

It might as well be when you have black privilege.

A lot of media oriented towards women deals with “viral” stories, purporting to show every day (((Americana))), or little acts of compassion.

But every spoonful of sugar only masks a spoonful of acidic Jew. People being kind to one another, or children exercising maturity beyond their years, is never flaunted in the press unless it has a political subtext. This is a watered down version of how the Soviets used to fill Pravda with propaganda stories about children that embodied the stated ideals of the government.

In this case, Jews are trying to make 2-year-old Sophie Benner into a multi-culti meme, to encourage other attention and fame-whoring moms in America to follow this template. The case here revolves around her going to Target to buy a doll, and picking (goaded by mom) a black doll. The evil, detestable white cashier asked her about it – since it is genuinely rare for girls to pick dolls of another race – and little Sophie gave her a speech about race that is obviously the product of someone (likely the mother) indoctrinating her.

This “story” is getting almost as much MSM attention as the anemic coverage of the St Petersburg bombing!

New York Post:

A photo of a young white girl, clutching a black baby doll, has gone viral — thanks to its message of racial diversity and inclusion.

…

“Nick and I told Sophia that after 1 whole month of going poop on the potty, she could pick out a special prize at Target,” Benner wrote, in reference to her daughter Sophia, who can be seen in the picture smiling from ear to ear with her brand-new best friend.

“She, of course, picked a new doll,” Benner said. “While we were checking out, the cashier asked Sophia if she was going to a birthday party. We both gave her a blank stare. She then pointed to the doll and asked Sophia if she picked her out for a friend. Sophia continued to stare blankly and I let the cashier know that she was a prize for Sophia being fully potty trained. The woman gave me a puzzled look and turned to Sophia and asked, ‘Are you sure this is the doll you want, honey?’ Sophia finally found her voice and said, ‘Yes, please!’”

To little Sophia Benner, there was nothing different about her new black baby doll — but the cashier apparently suggested that she pick out another.

“She doesn’t look like you. We have lots of other dolls that look more like you,” the woman told her mother.

Still, Sophia persisted.

“Yes, she does. She’s a doctor like I’m a doctor. And I’m a pretty girl and she’s a pretty girl,” the tot replied, according to her mom.

“See her pretty hair? And see her stethoscope?”

…

Benner described on Facebook how the incident ultimately left her feeling both proud and ashamed.

“This experience just confirmed my belief that we aren’t born with the idea that color matters,” she said. “Skin comes in different colors just like hair and eyes and every shade is beautiful.”

Social media users blasted the Target employee on Monday for questioning the youngster’s purchase.

“I would have told that lady to quit being a racist b—h!” Lacy Smith-Burleson wrote on Facebook.

The anatomy of this propaganda story hits all the tropes: the stupid and evil white working class bigot (who both the official left and right have agreed must die), the enlightened 2 year old reciting all the official talking points about race, and the mother who totally had nothing to do with her toddler’s choice, saying “see, race is socially constructed!” Another possibility is that the mother is exaggerating the story and the cashier’s reaction.

Objectively, the other side could argue that the message of racial inclusion and harmony is a good one, and that this justifies networks of trolls and bots digging through social media to manufacture stories like this for the national spotlight.

But if that is the motive, would a black girl praising a white doll for its pretty hair and doctor’s outfit be treated in this manner?

No, because it’s true, and the truth erodes a system built on lies. In fact, an experiment that found black children preferred playing with white dolls was seen as so disturbing and sickening, it was cited as compelling evidence in the Supreme Court’s “Brown vs Board (1954)” ruling!

If white children are expected to play with black dolls, but black children who play with white dolls are labeled “disturbed,” what will be the natural result?

It’s a white with their guard down and a black in a state of racial aggravation – against this same unsuspecting white. Interracial rapes, murders and assaults are a one-way crime, and many could be prevented simply by not brainwashing whites to think of Negroes as merely chocolate colored white people. But that’s the point: this is genocide propaganda.

As for how children are born feeling about race, below is how most children who aren’t brainwashed will react when they’re given a black doll. No Judenpresse propagandist will touch this one though.

We all know Jews operate on a wild battery of double standards that they try to keep a jealous secret, and when a brave soul dares point them out, they threaten and attack them. There used to be a whole industry of political commentary dedicated to covering for this double standard, called “Conservatism,” but it is waning after the Jew Neo-Cons put all their chips on Hillary and blew their credibility.

It’s impossible to make billions in Manhattan real estate without an intuitive understanding of the Jew and his odious psychology. I’m not saying Donald Trump hates every individual Jew, but he definitely knows how dangerous Jews are when they get together in a group, and without a doubt notices that their impact on our country and the world is detrimental.

For the less savvy, Trump’s meeting with Netanyahu makes him a cuck, but there was a subtle troll at this event that brought bat ears to attention across the political spectrum.

Reuters:

Donald Trump said today that he was open to a “one-state solution” to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, appearing to casually back away from a decades-long US commitment to supporting a separate Palestinian state alongside Israel.

Speaking alongside Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of their first meeting at the White House, Mr Trump was asked if he supported a two-state solution or a one state-solution to the long-running conflict.

“I’m looking at two-state and at one-state and I like the one that both parties like,” Mr Trump said.

“I can live with either one. I thought for a while the two-state looked like it may be the easier of the two but honestly if [Mr Netanyahu] and if the Palestinians, if Israel and the Palestinians are happy, I’m happy with the one they like the best.”

Mr Trump’s openness to a one-state solution is a break from the policies of Barack Obama, George W Bush and Bill Clinton, all of whom tried to broker a peace deal that would lead to the creation of two separate states.

Terms like “Two-State Solution” and “One-State Solution” to the Israel-Palestine conflict are abstract-sounding; this language is used purposefully, so that you don’t know what they’re talking about. The two-state solution, which is what American politicians are paid to support, is a plan to deport Israel’s indigenous Arab population to a Palestinian state, and create a racially homogeneous Zionist country.

Trump’s little off-the-cuff remark about a “one-state solution” is something which Jews are angered at the mere mention of. A one state solution would mean Israel absorbs the Palestinian territories and integrates the Arab population as fully-protected legal citizens. In such a scenario, the Arab population would outnumber Jews about 3 to 2.

What’s wrong with the one state solution? Aren’t Jews the most tolerant, open minded and cosmopolitan people to ever live? Why does diversity work everywhere in the West but not in Israel?

Every last Jewish and Zionist institution supports a “one-state solution” for white countries, and their genocide organs (the media, academia, finance) constantly stress how beautiful it is that whites will be outnumbered and outvoted by non-whites in the near future.

In fact, when white nationalists and black nationalists want to discuss the prospect of a desperately needed two-state solution in America, the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League call it “hate” and put them on a targeted-harassment list. Yet, these same Zionist groups believe anyone calling for an American-style racially pluralistic democracy in Israel is also “hate”!

The Right of Return

Typically, Jewish racists pretending to be hippy-citizens of the world have evaded direct rebuttals of exactly why they don’t want to share a country with non-Jews by claiming that the Palestinians don’t want it either. This is a lie bolstered by cooked up polls. The two dominant Palestinian parties, Hamas and Fatah, both have the Palestinian “Right of Return” as dominant aspects of their platforms. The right of return is the assertion that Palestinians who were ethnically cleansed from Israel in 1948 and 1967 have a right to move back into the homes and properties they once owned and were never compensated for.

There is a much stronger legal and ethical case for this claim than there is for the “Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society” assertion that endless millions of random non-whites in other countries are entitled to live in America on our tax dollars and social services because of a poem written by some other Jew about the Statue of Liberty.

The belief in the right of return is so strong among Palestinians, that Fatah arguably lost the last election over taking bribes in support of a no strings attached “two-state solution.” In recent years, they have gone back to supporting this important plank. Hamas’ principled stance to refuse to negotiate until Palestinians going back to homes they have deeds to in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, etc. is on the table, as well as being able to equally access Muslim holy sites in Israeli territory, is the basis from which cuckservatives and Zionists attack them as “refusing to recognize the Jewish state.”

The Jew Unmasked

Netanyahu knew to play it cool while next to Trump, but his agent behind the scenes, Commissioner Gordonberg, beamed the spotlight. Ratmen got the signal.

Some Jews, like Alan Dershowitz, interpreted (or tried explaining away) Trump’s remarks as a ploy to attack Palestinians and so supported it. A minority of Jews saw it as an endorsement of South African style Apartheid and applauded his comment, but I don’t think this is what Trump intended at all.

Trump’s brilliance here is that at the same time he is being barraged by organized Jewry for his immigration restrictions, he has simultaneously forced them to go around talking about how Israel must be kept racially Jewish at all costs. It isn’t just rabid Kahanists who are reacting, but also high profile liberal Jews, writing for hard Left publications, being forced to awkwardly attack Trump for suggesting maybe a “diverse” Israel is an option, while the related headlines around their article call him “racist” for banning Somalis.

Here are some examples from some very anti-Trump, anti-white, pro-mass immigration publications that support my theory. Some reactions are more extreme and kneejerk, while others are more surgical.

The Atlantic, by (((Adam Chandler))):

Though increasingly diminished and undermined, the two-state solution has endured since then—through the assassination of an Israeli prime minister, an intifada, the Israeli disengagement from Gaza, and three subsequent wars. In some of his final remarks as secretary of state in December, John Kerry made an urgent plea for the survival of the idea. “Here is a fundamental reality: if the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic—it cannot be both—and it won’t ever really be at peace. Moreover, the Palestinians will never fully realize their vast potential in a homeland of their own with a one state solution.”

Nevertheless, after decades of American diplomacy, jockeying, and cajoling, the two-state imperative did not survive a four-question press conference with President Donald Trump. And, in its place, there are still no other alternatives.

What about diversity and inclusion Adam? Last December, this brazen Jew wrote a fawning article on his fellow Jews working as immigration lawyers heroically defying Donald Trump, overtly implying that there are no alternatives but to make America brown. But for Israel, there are “no alternatives” but to keep Israel a majority Jewish Talmudic-authoritarian country.

The New York Times, Editorial Board statement:

President Trump came forward with a nonsensical statement on Wednesday as he dangerously backed away from the two-state solution, which has been central to America’s Mideast policy for more than 20 years and remains the only just answer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

…

Mr. Trump voiced optimism about getting a “great peace deal” between Israel and its neighbors. While Mr. Trump did urge Mr. Netanyahu to “hold back” on settlements in the West Bank and said Israel must make compromises, he offered no details on any peace initiative, and the vagueness of his remarks suggests he has no inkling of how to move forward. His willingness, however, to lend credence to those who would deny a separate state to the Palestinians will certainly make peace harder to achieve. Palestinians have long sought their own state and are sure to reject the idea of having their lands annexed by Israel, even if offered some kind of limited autonomy.

How many Palestinians are on the New York Times editorial board? Yet this Jew fake news portal once again claims to speak in their name.

Meanwhile, the actual Palestinians at Electronic Intifada liked Trump’s statement.

Electronic Intifada:

Advocates of a two-state solution, including the previous US administration and European governments, see it as the only way to rescue Israel as a racist state that ensures its Jewish demographic majority through a battery of racist laws – a situation they refer to as “peace.”

The New York Times of course doesn’t agree with Palestinians that Israel is also their country. They are the natives, and had a functioning and sophisticated state before Jews began flooding into it. They have a right to be there, unlike millions of Oaxaca Mexicans Jews transplanted into California.

Jerusalem Post:

According to J street, Trump’s statement that was “both meaningless and dangerous” and essentially “removed the anchor that has steadied and stabilized US policy toward the region”.

“How can there be a negotiation, let alone an agreement, when there is no longer a consensus on what the end goal should be?,” they said. “To be clear, there is no one-state configuration that leads to peace. There is no resolution to this conflict without full political rights and independence for both peoples.”

The organization added that “all so-called ‘one-state solutions’ are recipes for more violence that will ultimately threaten Israel’s identity as a democracy and a Jewish homeland” and that the two leaders “seemed detached from reality”.

They added that President Trump’s vagueness on this issue will likely dismay key allies of the US in the Arab world and will embolden extremists within Israel, among Palestinians and throughout the region.

J Street is considered a “liberal” Zionist group with a special place in their heart for Palestinians. Except when Trump talks about them having to share a country with these indigenous people, then the real Jew explodes out of their chest like a scene from John Carpenter’s The Thing.

This reaction from the (((Congressional Democrats))) speaks for itself.

Al Monitor:

Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, called Trump’s comments “shameful” and “short-sighted.” Last year, she spearheaded a letter to then-President Barack Obama signed by 394 House members — 90% of the entire chamber — reaffirming Congress’ support for a two-state solution.

“A two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians is the only means to ensure Israel’s long-term security and enable Palestinian aspirations for their own state,” she said in a statement Feb. 15. “That is why presidents from both parties, the vast majorities of the House and Senate, and the American people have consistently supported this objective, and why President Trump must as well.”

The top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs committee, Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., agreed on the substance.

”The alternatives to a two-state solution would mean that Israel would have to choose between its commitment to democracy and the solemn obligation to be a homeland for the Jewish people,” he said in a statement. “The parties must come back to the negotiating table to find a mutually agreed-upon solution.”

The top Democrat on the committee’s Middle East panel, Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., shared similar thoughts.

“The goal of this process must continue to be two states for two peoples living side by side in peace and security — a Jewish democratic state of Israel and a demilitarized Palestinian state,” he said in a statement.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., told Al-Monitor that Trump “doesn’t really understand the issues.” Earlier in the day Nadler tweeted out an April 2015 letter from Netanyahu in which the prime minister wrote him that he remained “committed to a sustainable two-state solution.”

“Certain things are very clear. You have to have a two-state solution, because you’re going to get no other solution,” Nadler said. “A one-state solution just means you’re going to try to impose your will on the Palestinians, and that’s a formula for war eventually, or you have a binational state, which has never worked in the Middle East, which is never going to work, and the dream of Zionism for 2,000 years for a Jewish state goes up in smoke.“

Vox, by (((Sarah Wildman))):

By abandoning an American-led, negotiated two-state solution, Trump is essentially giving up on the idea of there ever being a real, internationally recognized sovereign Palestinian state. Many Israelis and Palestinians believe that outcome would not only destroy any hope for peace between the two sides, leading to years of violence. They believe it could fundamentally alter, if not destroy, the Jewish and democratic state of Israel as we know it

…

In part that is because of demographics: Absorbing the Palestinian population would eventually result in there being more Palestinians than Jews in the country. To maintain a democratic state, with equal rights for all people, Israel would have to cede its Jewish character. The alternative is undemocratic — giving Palestinians unequal rights and treating them as second-class citizens.

I’ve written extensively about the extreme anti-white vitriol published by Vox. Predictably, it’s run entirely by Jews who get fat Wall Street investments.

Huffington Post, by (((David Harris))):

In the end, however fraught with difficulty the two-state path might be, the one-state alternative is even more menacing because it is simply not sustainable. Sooner or later, it would sound the death knell for Zionism as we know it. Hence the concern about President Trump’s comment, even if this is surely not what he intended.

Why would a few million Palestinians be the “death knell of Zionism,” since nations are nothing but passports and a set of values? That’s the kind of thinking Jews forcefully impose on everyone else!

The quotes in this article are only the tip of the iceberg. There are literally dozens of high profile media Jews who oppose any immigration restriction in America who are furious about Trump’s comment.

The Jew Harris, whose gang of international Kikes at the American Jewish Committee personally went to Greece to get Golden Dawn thrown in jail, is an egregious hypocrite to say the least.

Some people think that pointing out Jewish double-standards is a fruitless endeavor, and it is – but only when you’re trying to point them out to Jews. Of course, trying to play that “I’m a White Zionist” game to get Jews off your back is pointless (although it can lead to some mildly effective moments if non-Jews are watching).

But in the end, National Socialists are distinct from Zionist Jews. National Socialists accept that all races have a right to their living space. We do not endorse driving natives out of their land, whether it’s the people of Tibet, the Palestinians or the Germans in Germany.

But Israel isn’t Jewish land, and looking at the reaction from Left-wing Jews at what is essentially a very mild comment (he didn’t even say it would be US policy), Trump has stumbled upon a gaslighting gold mine.

For whites, people who live by double-standards are viscerally offensive. If you show the average white person that organized Jewry is behind every unpopular immigration project in the West while at the same time holding virulently racist views in the only country they have loyalty to, it will resonate.

With a bigger audience than ever, renew that prescription of red pills on this topic. It didn’t work before because nobody was listening. They’re listening now.

The Daily Stormer editorial board hereby endorses a One-State Solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, with full right of return to all Palestinians forced out of their homes and property.

Jews are notorious for being contrarians, but there’s two beliefs their hundreds of distinct international pressure groups agree upon: keeping non-Jews out of Israel and bringing non-whites into the West.

In Britain, the “Dubs Amendment” to the 2016 immigration act, imposed by the Jewish parliament member “Lord Dubs” (Alf Dubs) seeks to transport “child” refugees (adult men claiming to be children) illegally occupying other European nations to the UK, even though nobody in Britain other than Jews, celebrities that work for Jews and the kinsmen of the “refugees” themselves want this policy. The expensive and demographically problematic issue is being questioned by a beleaguered Theresa May, who at gunpoint already pulled Britain out of the failed European Union.

But Jews don’t like it.

Times of Israel:

Members of the Jewish community held a silent protest outside the Home Office on Monday night, urging the government not to end the Dubs scheme for vulnerable and lone child refugees

The scheme, named after its architect, Labour peer Lord Alf Dubs, will be capped once another 150 unaccompanied children are brought to Britain, on top of the 200 already in the UK.

Organised by the Jewish Council for Racial Equality (JCORE) on behalf of the Jewish Communal Taskforce for Refugees, the protest saw rabbis and community figures speak at the vigil.

…

Edie Friedman, Executive Director of JCORE said “Many in the Jewish community feel strongly about this issue. They find it incomprehensible that the government is leaving vulnerable lone children in refugee camps, and on the streets in Greece and Italy, at the mercy of smugglers, traffickers, rapists and radicalisers. We call on the government to reverse this decision and to protect these children who are desperate for our help”.

If these “unaccompanied children” are so vulnerable, how did they survive the dangerous trek from “Syria” to Europe to begin with?

Check out the vulnerability of these little children. Wow. In 2017.

Jews are known to be very generous with other people’s countries and money, but if their intention is truly humanitarian, why not call for the funds they seek to set aside for refugee resettlement to go to aid women and children in Syria and Lebanon where a British pound goes further than in London?

Notice how no Jewish organization, lobby group, or parliament member seems interested in this option. Instead, Jews want all of the foreign aid set aside for Syria in the West to go to buy weapons for Al-Qaeda, who are the reason there is a “refugee” problem to begin with!

Jews hate Muslims almost as much as they hate whites, as seen by the policies they support in Israel. Their only motivation is wishing harm on white people, not helping anyone.

When the Jew speaks philanthropy, his actions suggest misanthropy.

Why does Britain have to take refugees and not Israel? Very simple. Israel is a Jewish state, while Britain is a Jewish occupied state. Know the difference, putz.

Jews in the West

Jews in Israel

It’s impossible to reconcile capitalism with nationalism because non-plutocratic values like borders, ethical labor standards and tradition are barriers to profit.

The profitability of big business naturally diminishes in the domestic sphere once competition in a sector (whether it’s soda pop or automobiles) hits a certain threshold, making globalization and state-cronyism a question of survival for entities like, for example, Coca Cola. It is important however to distinguish the motives in the alliance of America’s ruling plutocracy – Jews and multi-national capitalists – as the former is fueled by wicked dreams of unopposed world domination, while the latter operates on behalf of shareholders looking to turn a quick and handsome profit through third world feudal labor (outsourced or insourced) and unfettered access to foreign markets.

There is naturally great overlap and back-and-forth between the two interests, which explains why even some non-Jew run companies tend to hire Jew-run Cultural Marxist marketing agencies to produce polarizing and politically charged propaganda.

Alienating half or more of the country with pro-mass immigration Super Bowl ads like the ones commissioned by Budweiser, 84 Lumber or AirBNB may seem like a dumb idea, but the social-engineering Jew and the corporate Po-Mo Left (social and racial, rather than economic, Leftism) is heavily invested in America becoming a majority non-white country. They won’t let go without a fight.

Here are some of the highlights and background information on the anti-Trump and anti-white advertisements:

AirBNB: #WeAccept

This ad features evolving flashes of miscellaneous non-white people in an implied statement of support for multi-culturalism. AirBnB is a service that allows private home owners to rent rooms to vacationers, but this $5 million dollar ad makes no mention of what the company even does. It is an undiluted political statement against Trump’s rapeugee ban.

AirBnB has been under fire because its users (including blacks) naturally would rather not rent to blacks. With its new regulations forcing whites to open up their homes to random blacks that will rape, destroy, refuse to pay and steal from hosts, it’s only a matter of time until the company loses its user base.

Jonathan Mildenhall, the CMO at AirBnB who created the ad, is half-Jewish and half-black. AirBnB itself is also owned by Jews.

Budweiser: “Born The Hard Way”

Budweiser’s ad featured a German immigrating to America to become an entrepreneur.

This advertisement is clearly an attack on Trump, but it’s not really all that extreme despite its coverage in conservative media. Though you should boycott this crappy beer regardless, as it’s obvious they hate their blue collar white customers. While Germans and other non-Anglo-Saxon Europeans who immigrated to America were subject to a degree of “discrimination,” the debate today is vastly different and far more pertinent. People aren’t against immigrants, they’re against incompatible Mexicans and Somalis being transplanted by the tens of millions to destroy America. When liberals posit that opponents of illegal immigration are just “racist,” they’re correct, since this is a matter of demographics (including for those who make legalistic arguments) and not some legal technicality.

The Bud ad was certainly ill-intended, but the two Brazilian creators did not make it too inflammatory or in-your-face in my opinion. This, coincidentally, is the only advertisement of the sort that wasn’t created by Jews.

Coca Cola: “America The Beautiful”

Coca Cola did a standard “we’re all Americans” bit. This was a repeat from the last Super Bowl. The advertisement seeks to celebrate both American imperialism (a Jewish vehicle) and white decline in the historically European majority nation of the USA.

The ad was met with outrage when it first aired. Rather than noting the complaints and scrapping it, the agency, Gravity Media, decided to confront critics and call them racist. The message from the Jew creator Luba Tolkachyov in her open letter is very simple, “America is going to be multi-racial, get used to it goyim!”

But the Jews haven’t been violently run out of more than 100 countries without reason. In 2012, this exact same Pale of Settlement vampire developed a dating app that racially excludes non-Jews.

Multi-Culti, like manual labor, is only for the goyim!

Lumber 84: “The Entire Journey”

This one was by far the most blatant attack on America and Trump, even featuring the soon-to-come wall. The ad stars a Mexican mother and her daughter, two sympathetic figures making a long and dangerous journey only to find Trump’s evil wall. In real life, illegals are not so sympathetic, even the “unaccompanied minors” crossing the border are mostly MS-13 recruits importing horrifyingly violent crimes and chaos to broad swaths of the United States.

The ad’s creator, (((Robert Shapiro))), deployed his double-think in defining America through the lens of an (((Emma Lazarus))) poem, rather than what its founders believed: “the ad isn’t about the wall, it’s about opportunity… We view the message as very patriotic. The message is simple. In a land of opportunity, 84 Lumber is a company of opportunity.”

Opportunity for non-whites who want to deal drugs while bankrupting our public services, that is.

Jews have played out our heart strings. Now the goyim know they’re being manipulated, ads like this have sparked a growing backlash against the relatively new company that hopefully will cripple them.

It’s A 10 : “Haircare”

This one makes fun of Trump’s hair.

This ad isn’t so much political as it is infantile and stupid. This kind of material is aimed at the middle aged female and mental-midget branch of the liberal movement, which tends to fixate on Donald Trump’s hair or quasi-Freudian assertions about how his “small hands” and strong will must mean he’s “compensating” for a baby-dick. “It’s a 10” is run by Carolyn Aronson, a filthy Boca Raton Jew with an unfunny Boca Raton Jew sense of humor.

Audi: #DriveProgress Daughter

This ad features a father mourning over the fact that his daughter will be oppressed by the patriarchy when she grows up, as he watches her compete against boys in a race.

Here we have another example of a malicious Jewish lie being repeated until it becomes true (exactly what Hitler was talking about when he spoke of the infamously misquoted ‘Big Lie’ in Mein Kampf). The gender pay gap has been thoroughly debunked, but with Audis costing close to $50,000 dollars, they are wise to nurture middle class feminist narcissistic myths, as the real gender gap tends to be in accumulated debt.

Additionally, political material in this propaganda piece features a hyper-competitive and angry looking little girl aggressively driving a box-car besides boys. Behaving in this fashion does not come naturally to most women, yet they are thrown into this pigeonhole by social-engineers that have made it impossible for females to choose to be stay at home family women (which the majority would prefer). By nurturing ugly behaviors like egoism and competitiveness in women, not only are they being set up for a very unhappy life, but they will also miss out on their natural calling to be partners of men and nurturers of children.

As always, all social toxicity always traces back to a hook-nosed microbe. The ad was created by Venables & Partners, whose creative director is (((Lee Einhorn))), a Jersey Jew.

In taking Occam’s Razor to Judah’s neck, we can sift through all the intellectual spam about “white liberals” and their puzzling “humanitarian” motivations. The equation is simple: Jews and business elites do this for power and money, and whether that makes us extinct or not is not their problem. We can only stop them from destroying us by directly standing up to them, and not chasing the infinite number of red herrings conservative types release into our ideological ecosystem.

Boycott them all!

White people exist without reflection on either ethnicity or race. Identity politics in an increasingly multicultural Western world is paramount in exercising political autonomy. If Whites fail to realize their uniqueness, and value in and of themselves as an ethnic group, they’ll continue on their spiral towards political oblivion. This video asks for nothing other than reflection.

Is minority status in Western nations a desirable endgame? If trends continue, this will be (and already is in some cases) a lived reality. What do Whites have to gain from this? What subjective reality has put Western humans in this position?

Just two months after Ireland recorded the first case of leprosy in the country for decades, a second case has been confirmed.

The second incident occurred in the north-east of the country, the same area as the first and the HSE was notified of the case in June.  The HSE has confirmed the case and it is believed that, as with the earlier case, the patient was a male foreign national who had contracted the disease abroad.

“This case was notified to the Health Protection Surveillance Centre by the HSE North East in June 2013. The individual had a recurrence of leprosy which the individual had contracted in another country. He did not acquire Leprosy in Ireland,” a HSE spokesperson told TheJournal.ie.

Read More