Juniper Bryson

People hate, but a bitch gotta get she money.

New York Post:

A pregnant 21-year-old Texas woman tried to sell her unborn baby to the “highest bidder” and shook down would-be desperate adoptive parents for cash in the maternity ward, according to cops.

Juniper Bryson posted in September on a group for adoptive parents looking for “adoptive parents” just days before she was set to give birth.

One of her alleged marks was Wendy Williams who responded to the post, signed legal paperwork to adopt the baby, and traveled to the hospital for the birth, Williams told ABC 13.

The baby she tried to sell.

But at the maternity ward, she learned the “adoption” was a scam, said.

In reality, Bryson had spent the last days of her pregnancy shopping the unborn baby around online and demanding cash payments from would-be parents, and was “waiting for the highest bidder in exchange for her son” while lying in the recovery room, cops say.

Her effort to sell the child began as early as Sept. 21, just three days before the baby was born, when Bryson asked a distant relative for help finding a home for her son, court documents allege.

The relative then wrote a Facebook post that said: “She needs someone there during labor and take baby boy home. She doesn’t want him going into foster care.”

But in a follow-up message exchange, Bryson told the relative that whomever takes the child was “gonna have to compensate,” phone records show, prompting the relative to respond with, “that’s illegal!”

I don’t really see how this is much different from the adoption system. The “real adoption” people are just mad because the mother is getting the money.

Wait, we’re still doing this?

I thought this really goofy stuff was sort of ramping down a little bit? I keep hearing that’s happening, then I see these news articles.

New York Post:

A Massachusetts bill, which seeks to update state law to redefine who legally qualifies as a parent, passed in the state senate on Thursday and now awaits signature from Democratic Governor Maura Healey to become law.

The Massachusetts Parentage Act aims to ensure “legal parentage equality” for children born to parents “without regard to the marital status, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation of their parents or the circumstances of their birth, including whether they were born as a result of assisted reproduction or surrogacy,” the bill text explains.

The bill requires gendered terms like “father” and “mother” to be stripped from state parentage law and replaced with more “inclusive” terms like “parent” or “the person who gave birth.” Advocates say the bill protects the legal parenting rights of diverse and LGBTQ families.

Democratic state senator Julian Cyr, a co-sponsor of the bill, celebrated its passage on X, writing, “LGBTQ+ families like mine face excessive and expensive hoops just to ensure our children have the security of legal parentage. The Senate’s passage of this bill is a critical step towards parentage equality in Massachusetts!”

This might actually not pass.

It feels like, especially with the election coming up, people are trying to get this sort of thing out of the headlines.

LGBTQ+ families like mine face excessive and expensive hoops just to ensure our children have the security of legal parentage. The Senate’s passage of this bill is a critical step towards parentage equality in Massachusetts! 🎉👏🏻 https://t.co/jz96gjlCCJ

— Julian Cyr (@JulianCyr) July 30, 2024

Jonathan Jacob Meijer

Women are a disaease.

They need to be contained.

The Guardian:

Even when she was searching online for a sperm donor, Vanessa wanted her children to know their father. In 2015, she was 34, the right partner hadn’t come along and fertility treatment “would have bankrupted me”, she says.

A website listing dozens of Dutchmen willing to donate privately seemed to answer her prayers. Though no photographs were posted, Vanessa was drawn to one profile in particular. The man – Jonathan – wrote that he’d been inspired to sign up after friends of his had struggled to conceive. “I thought: ‘That’s nice – he wants to help’,” says Vanessa.

Vanessa

Most important, for her, was that he was open to a relationship with his offspring. Under Dutch law, donor-conceived children may only learn their donor’s identity when they turn 16.

“He wanted to be somewhat involved with the kids, to know how they were doing … I really wanted my children to have that.” She laughs without humour. “That’s all gone now – and it won’t ever, ever get better.”

Not long after her daughter was born in 2015, Vanessa’s path to parenthood was blown up by a discovery on Facebook: Jonathan Jacob Meijer was a serial sperm donor, and her daughter had at least 100 half-siblings.

Last year Meijer was ordered by a Dutch court to stop, having been found to have fathered as many as 600 children in the Netherlands since 2007. Some mothers of his offspring – based as far away as Australia – believe the true number globally is closer to 1,100. Moreover, they don’t believe that Meijer has stopped.

The bizarre and unsettling story is the subject of Netflix’s new three-part docuseries, The Man With 1000 Kids. The series unfolds like true crime, each episode revealing yet another level to Meijer’s international operation. But its focus is on the women he deceived, the alliance they forged against him, and the families forced to live with the consequences of his actions.

Executive producer Natalie Hill came to the story in 2020, when Meijer had been investigated by Dutch authorities but not publicly named. Having connected with a group of “resilient, strong, passionate” mothers who had conceived with his sperm, Hill spent two years developing the idea before bringing in director Josh Allott. “It really mattered to me that they knew they could trust me,” she says.

Some decided not to appear on camera, while some interviewees are given pseudonyms. It was a difficult decision for them to go public, says Hill – “but they wanted to try and stop him.”

When we speak via Zoom, weeks from the series’ launch, Vanessa is nervous and fearing judgment. “I’ve been in the media before, but this is a whole new level,” she says as her two children – aged five and seven, both fathered by Meijer – clamour for her attention.

She did her due diligence, Vanessa says. Searching Meijer’s name online, she found his YouTube channel, sharing his passion for music, travel and philosophical musings, but no cause for concern.

Meijer was handsome, with long, strawberry-blond curls. But for Vanessa, looks were less important than shared values and approach to family. “I fell for his profile.”

After messaging for more than a week, they met at Central Station in The Hague – Vanessa’s choice. She’d wanted to be safe, she explains, her tone heavy with irony: “You never know what a man can do.”

They talked for over an hour. “There were no alarm bells whatsoever,” says Vanessa. Meijer seemed “like the guy next door”: easygoing, engaging, polite. She paid him €165 (£140) for his sample and covered his travel costs.

Two years later, when Vanessa was trying to reach Meijer about a second sample, she saw a post on a Facebook group for single mothers in the Netherlands and joined the dots: Meijer had not been honest about the extent of his donation. “I was like, ‘Shit – what the hell did I get into?’”

Meijer had told Vanessa that her child would be his eighth. Not only was this not true, but he had also donated sperm to multiple Dutch fertility clinics – at least 11 by 2023, according to court records – lying to them all about his activities elsewhere.

Vanessa had wanted her children to be full siblings, to grow up with that common link. Having learned that Meijer could not be trusted, “I really struggled with what to do,” she says. Fearing being misled again, she decided to pursue Meijer for a second sample – this time with her eyes open.

Vanessa recalls Meijer’s indifferent response after she confronted him: “Why are you surprised? If I’d been honest with you, would you have chosen me?”

Probably not, Vanessa agreed – but at least she would have had all the facts. “I didn’t have a fair choice. That’s what hurt the most.”

Vanessa cherishes her children, but Meijer’s betrayal upended her life. “My trust in people was gone, pulverised almost beyond repair.”

If I ever met this bitch, I would turn on my iPod and start blasting Bob Seger at her.

A group of families learn the charismatic man they had trusted is the sperm donor to hundreds — or perhaps thousands — of other children across the world.

The Man With 1000 Kids premieres 3 July, only on Netflix. pic.twitter.com/9Gce53u88N

— Netflix UK & Ireland (@NetflixUK) June 25, 2024

Is the government going to do something about this?

Or are they just going to keep talking about cow farts?

Why is this stuff about the chemicals only reported in the Guardian? Why don’t other mainstream news outlets report the fact that we’re all being turned into diseased mutant freaks by industrial chemicals.

The Guardian:

Women exposed to toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” prior to pregnancy face an elevated risk of being unable to breastfeed early, new research finds.

The study tracked lactation durations for over 800 new moms in New Hampshire and found higher PFAS exposure could cause lactation to slow or stop altogether within six months.

The findings are “cause for concern” said Megan Romano, an epidemiologist at Dartmouth University and the lead author.

“For all women who are exposed, there’s a little bit of a decrease in the amount of time they breastfeed beyond delivery,” Romano said.

…

The new study found higher exposure led to a 28% higher risk of stopping exclusive breastfeeding before six months and some stopped breastfeeding altogether.

Only about one-third of US moms breastfeed beyond 12 months, though the World Health Organization and major pediatric groups recommend up to two years and beyond. The study may help explain why many US women stop breastfeeding early, though socioeconomic issues and other factors could play a role, Romano said.

The government won’t stop this. They won’t even talk about it.

How can we claim the government is legitimate?

Who can claim that?

This study, paired with our research that found #PFAS in 100% of breast milk, paints a disturbing picture of a HUGE problem!

Kids deserve better than obesity, insulin resistance & cancer from PFAS in everyday products like food packaging & cosmetics. https://t.co/KMVZ0UZOz6 pic.twitter.com/YUATJyTNve

— Toxic-Free Future (@ToxFreeFuture) March 20, 2023

Tired of the “I’m a mom” excuse for ditching your shopping cart. I’ve taken kids to the store many times in my life and always managed to return my cart. It isn’t difficult.

pic.twitter.com/By3MNVBuYT

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 4, 2024

This California mom doesn’t want to walk six feet to return her shopping cart? pic.twitter.com/wW9Qi7G2A0

— The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) June 6, 2024

A white 3-year-old just got stabbed by a black woman in a grocery store parking lot.

We are not living in a civilized country like Japan where you can just leave your kids alone for a few minutes without worrying about it.

There is nothing but crime in this shithole country, and under no circumstances should women be leaving their kids alone. In fact, it’s questionable if women should even be going to grocery stores at all in certain areas.

Leftists just want to pretend that this crime situation is not completely out of control, because obviously they and their lunatic pro-black programs are responsible for it.

New York Post:

A California mom who went viral for her rant about grocery store shopping carts was invited to make her point for viewers on KTLA 5 Weekend Morning News on Saturday, reaffirming her controversial stance that returning buggies isn’t worth her time.

“I’m not returning my shopping cart, and you can judge me all you want,” said Leslie Dobson, a Los Angeles-based psychologist, in a May 29 post on TikTok, which has earned nearly 12 million views. “I’m not getting my groceries into my car and getting my children into the car and then leaving them in the car.”

“So, if you’re going to give me a dirty look, f*** off,” Dobson concluded in her 17-second message, ostensibly recorded from the driver’s seat of her car while parked after a supermarket run.

Leslie Dobson

In a follow-up video published May 31, she doubled down on her hot take, claiming that 265 children were abducted from parking lots last year with half also being sexually assaulted. Her data appeared to be lifted from research by the nonprofit Kids and Car Safety, referring to the number of kids who happen to be in the car during attempted vehicle thefts.

Many viewers weren’t sympathetic to Dobson’s logic. “Somehow all of us other moms manage to return the cart,” one rebuked.

Maybe all the liberal moms live in high security areas that have off-duty cops guarding the Whole Foods parking lots.

Most normal people don’t have that option.

Most normal people are struggling with money and have to go to normal grocery stores in normal neighborhoods.

See: Ohio: Black Woman Stabs 3-Year-Old White Kid to Death in Random Attack

This woman Bionca Ellis just ambushed a mother and her child in a parking lot in Ohio and stabbed the woman’s 3 year old toddler Julian Wood to death for no apparent reason.

But you won’t hear about this story on the news because…..well we all know why right? pic.twitter.com/SLaBUCqbQX

— Cinema Shogun (@CinemaShogun) June 4, 2024

That happened in Ohio, in a place anyone could have said was “safe.”

Doctor, doctor, there must be a mix-up!

You killed the wrong baby…!

Ah, well.

No biggie.

Everyone makes mistakes.

New York Post:

Multiple investigations are underway after Czech Republic doctors performed an abortion on the wrong woman.

Medics mistakenly terminated the fetus of an expectant mother who was four months pregnant on March 25, according to The Evening Standard.

The victim had arrived at Bulovka University Hospital in Prague for what she thought would be a routine check-up, the outlet reported.

However, she was instead placed under anaesthesia intended for another patient and a curettage, or surgical cleaning of the uterus, was instead performed without her consent or knowledge, resulting in a miscarriage.

It’s a horrible story.

Hard not to laugh though.

What a ridiculous “civilization” we have.

Abortion is modern-day child sacrifice. Pass it on if you agree! pic.twitter.com/3D4tGz5GOx

— The Priory Church of St Mary Magdalene (@magdalenechapel) March 26, 2024

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

Previously: UK: Drug Known to Cause Birth Defects Since the 70s Still Prescribed to Pregnant Women

We simply cannot stress enough that the US government is threatening to regulate AI while Americans are being poisoned from every single direction. Everywhere you look, there is some new poison entering the bodies of Americans.

Pharma cannot be regulated. Big agriculture cannot be regulated. Petrochemical companies cannot be regulated.

Your small business can be regulated into oblivion, however. IRS agents with guns can come kill you because you didn’t pay enough taxes. The government can run small businesses out of business by pushing lunatic minimum wage laws.

The government can censor social media. The government can somehow steal Daily Stormer’s domains, and block them from using any American or European services for anything. The government can kidnap your kids and put them in a homosexual rape house to be turned into trannies.

The government can do coronavirus lockdowns, where cops can beat the shit out of you for refusing to wear a mask.

Property taxes exist, which means you do not actually own property in America. The government will force Christians to bake anal cakes.

There is this insane situation going on where the American government uses both socialism and libertarianism, situationally. When it comes to regulating poisons that are going into your body, it’s pure libertarianism. Meanwhile, when it comes to small businesses, freedom of speech, parental rights, private property, or freedom of association, it’s Stalinism.

Do you see this? Do you smell what I’m cooking? It’s a very important insight.

I don’t support libertarianism or Stalinism. However, pure libertarianism, or, in fact, pure Stalinism, would both be a million times better than what we have now.

People are whining I put Stalin in the banner. If you’re whining about that, you’re a baby. Promoting Stalin is funny. Stalin was an awesome criminal and psychopathic power-hungry lunatic who seized control of a superpower using the most brutal mastermind tactics possible, then had all the Jews he climbed over hunted down and killed. Imagine that Trotsky was in Mexico hanging out with goofy and untalented mural painters when the NKVD sunk an ice pick into his brain.

I don’t support Stalinism, however. I would support Russia annexing the Baltics, but Putin doesn’t want to do that, and there’s no real reason to do it, so I don’t support it. However, the claim that “Stalin murdered millions of people” is stupid on its face. Claiming famines are done on purpose is unfalsifiable. Collectivization would have led to famines regardless, so you’d have to argue that collectivization was itself a conspiracy by Stalin to kill his own workforce, and it’s like, “why?”

Stalin did kill a lot of people, for sure, but there were not mass exterminations. People against him (or suspected of being against him) were send to Siberia and died of exposure. That happened. If we’re talking about millions of people, then let’s see the mass graves.

Point being: I would exchange the Biden Administration for the Stalin Administration without even thinking about it. Stalin executed homosexuals, he didn’t steal kids and give them to homosexuals.

The Guardian:

In 2009, Emma Murphy took a phone call from her sister that changed her life. “At first, I couldn’t make out what she was saying; she was crying so much,” Murphy says. “All I could hear was ‘Epilim’.” This was a brand name for sodium valproate, the medication Murphy had been taking since she was 12 to manage her epilepsy.

Her sister explained that a woman on the local news had claimed that taking the drug during her pregnancies had harmed her children. She was appealing for other women who might have experienced this to come forward.

Murphy found the news segment that evening and watched it. “I was just stunned,” she says. “Watching that, I knew. I knew there and then that my children had been affected.”

Janet Williams and Emma Murphy

At that point, Murphy was a mother to five children, all under six, and married to Joe, a taxi driver in Manchester. “My kids are fabulous, all of them, but I’d known for years that something was wrong,” she says. “They weren’t meeting milestones. There was delayed speech, slowness to crawl, not walking. There was a lot of drooling – that was really apparent. They were poorly, with constant infections. I was always at the doctors with one of them.

“I knew there was something wrong and I’d say it to doctors, to friends, to family, but no one was listening. I was told: ‘It’s a phase.’ ‘You’re reading too much into things.’ ‘You’re depressed.’” At times, she had wondered if her medication was to blame. “Everyone knows about thalidomide, but then I’d think: there’s no way. It can’t be. I’ve been told so many times – by midwives, by doctors, by consultants – over so many years that it was safe to keep taking.” By the time Murphy saw the news item, one of her children, Lauren, had been diagnosed with cerebral palsy.

“It was 10 at night, but I called the news station straight away and asked for this woman’s number,” says Murphy. “I knew I should wait until morning, but I couldn’t. Janet answered the phone and we talked for two hours.” At this point, Murphy wells up and has to pause. Then she says simply: “She saved my life.”

This call between Murphy and Janet Williams was the start of an incredible partnership. It led to the report published this month by England’s patient safety commissioner, Dr Henrietta Hughes, which recommended a compensation scheme for families of children harmed by valproate taken in pregnancy. Hughes has suggested initial payments of £100,000 and described the damage caused by the drug as “a bigger scandal than thalidomide”. It is estimated that 20,000 British children have been exposed to the drug while in the womb.

Williams and Murphy have campaigned relentlessly to reach this point. It is by no means the endpoint – even now, an estimated three babies are born each month having been exposed to the drug. Together, the women formed In-Fact (the Independent Fetal Anti Convulsant Trust) to find and support families like theirs. They were instrumental in the creation of an all-party parliamentary group to raise awareness in government. They went to Geneva to get foetal valproate spectrum disorder (FVSD) included in the latest version of the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases.

Perhaps most crucially, they uncovered papers from the early 1970s that revealed the key decisions that informed how the drug would be prescribed. They found notes from the manufacturer, Sanofi, that stated that valproate could be teratogenic – harmful to foetuses. They also found the response from the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), then the main decision-making body on new medicines, which concluded that the risk was low and that patients should not be informed, in order to avoid “fruitless anxiety”.

All this has taken 15 years, but Williams has been battling for a lot longer. “Both my boys are now in their 30s,” she says. “We realised what had happened when our youngest was just 12 months.”

Williams, who lives in Pilling, Lancashire, was diagnosed with epilepsy at 16 and prescribed valproate. She had gone on to marry Steve, a bus driver, and have two sons, Lee and Philip. Both spent time in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). “Within 12 hours of being born, Lee was very jittery, shaky, refusing his feeds, and they rushed him off to NICU,” she says. “They explained that it was withdrawal from the valproate. He was there for seven days, but they said absolutely nothing about how it would affect him in later life. I gave birth to his brother, Philip, 16 months later and went through exactly the same thing.”

For the next year, many problems worried her. The boys were slow to reach for toys, roll over, crawl or attempt to talk or walk. When they were two and one respectively, they were given an appointment with a geneticist at St Mary’s hospital in Manchester. “The whole family went,” says Williams. “The geneticist told me both boys had been diagnosed with FVSD within 24 hours of being born. She said she’d looked at the research papers and couldn’t find any reason for the problems they were having other than valproate. At first, I was speechless. ‘So the medications caused this?’ was my first question. She said: ‘I’m afraid so.’ There was so little research; there wasn’t much she could tell us about what to expect. “I’d harmed my children. That’s how I felt. The guilt is enormous and it never leaves you.”

…

Murphy learned that symptoms of FVSD vary, which was why her children had been affected in such different ways. Neurodevelopmental disorders are the most common. Between 30% and 40% of children exposed to valproate during pregnancy have delays in development, lower intellectual abilities, poor language skills and memory problems. Children with a history of valproate exposure in pregnancy have a threefold risk of autistic spectrum disorder compared with the general population. There is also an 11% risk of congenital malformations, including heart and kidney defects, spina bifida, cleft palate and limb defects.

The government won’t do anything.

Maybe they will change the chemicals causing this to similar chemicals that do the same thing.

But these people do not care. This is a democracy, meaning that all government officials function on one principle only: who will pay them the most money.

Pharma has a lot of money.

More campaigning mothers.

The US government is threatening to regulate AI.

What they will never regulate is:

• Corporate agriculture
• Industrial chemical manufacture
• Pharma
• Trannies
• Plastic
• “Green technology” dumping toxic waste in the oceans and groundwater
• Israel

The government says you’re not allowed to use an AI, but corporations are allowed to poison your body.

New York Post:

Taking antidepressants such as Prozac during pregnancy can affect the child’s brain development and potentially lead to them having mental health disorders later in life, a new study warns.

The research, published Friday in the journal Nature Communications, is said to be the first study to provide evidence of the direct impact of serotonin, a feel-good hormone, on the fetal development of the prefrontal cortex, a key part of the brain.

Scientists at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus focused their research on the antidepressant fluoxetine — sold under the brand names Prozac and Sarafem, among others — which works by raising serotonin levels.

“While it is known that serotonin plays a role in the brain development, the mechanisms responsible for this influence, specifically in the prefrontal cortex, have been unclear,” lead study author Won Chan Oh, an assistant professor in the Department of Pharmacology at CU Anschutz, explained in a statement.

Won Chan Oh

“The prefrontal cortex, the most evolved brain region, plays a central role in highest-order cognition, which is why we focused our study on finding the answer from this brain area,” Oh added.

…

Oh says pregnant women should be made aware of the potential side effects of taking antidepressants and of drug alternatives for postpartum depression, as fluoxetine not only crosses the placenta but can also be passed to children through breastfeeding.

Do you know that “the authorities” still don’t understand how SSRIs work? They know it dumps serotonin in your brain be inhibiting its reuptake, but they don’t know why the drugs do that. They have no idea what the long term effects of it are, and studies into this are typically blocked.

This shit is not regulated, because Washington runs on money. Pharma has a lot of money. They pay politicians to ensure that these things are not investigated by the government. Instead, they do their own studies, which say that everything is great, then give them to Congress to produce in justifying allowing these drugs.

It’s the same thing agro-business does, the petrochemical industry, and every other group that is poisoning us.

It’s also what the arms manufactures do. All of the think tanks that produce papers claiming it’s a good idea to have wars with Russians, Moslems, and Chinese people are funded by arms manufactures, and then used as the basis for laws.

This is all so corrupt it’s cartoonish.

Surprise, surprise.

It turns out that antidepressants have been propped up by FRAUDULENT science.

“Most clinical drug trials have found the effectiveness of antidepressants is ON PAR with placebo,” wrote Dr. Joseph Mercola.

On the other hand:

“Large-scale meta-analyses show… pic.twitter.com/lmVGrJpFkD

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) February 13, 2024

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

Koreans were not even brainwashed with global warming propaganda, and their birthrate fell the lowest.

I’ve argued from the beginning that the claim that anti-natal propaganda had a significant effect on the birthrate was bullshit. The birthrate drop is due to women’s liberation, specifically birth control pills (and abortion).

Koreans don’t have anti-natal propaganda, but they do have women’s liberation, and their birthrate is the worst.

The other factor here, unfortunately, is the “coronavirus vaccine.” Koreans almost all took the Pfizer vax.

It’s nice that Korea is willing to pay women to breed. It probably won’t do anything, but it’s a nice gesture. In America and Europe, we just get scolded for not breeding and then told we have to be flooded with immigrants.

CNN:

A South Korean company is ready to pay millions of dollars to help fix the country’s abysmally low birth rate.

Booyoung Group, a construction firm based in Seoul, plans to pay employees 100 million Korean won ($75,000) each time they have a baby, it said in a press release Monday. It will also pay a total of 7 billion Korean won ($5.25 million) in cash to employees who have had 70 babies since 2021, the company added.

The benefit is available to men and women, a company spokesperson told CNN.

At 0.78 in 2022, South Korea has the world’s lowest fertility rate — which indicates the average number of children a woman will have in her lifetime — and that ratio is expected to drop further to 0.65 in 2025, according to official forecasts from Statistics Korea.

…

Booyoung Group’s Chairman Lee Joong-keun said the company is offering “direct financial support” to its employees to help ease the monetary burden of raising children.

Employees with three babies will be given an option to choose between receiving 300 million Korean won ($225,000) in cash or rental housing, if the government provides land for construction, he added at a company event on Monday.

Although the birthrate drop is very unfortunate, it probably doesn’t really matter that much, given that robots are going to be filling so many job positions in the future.

That is to say: we do not need mass immigration, in any country, because although the birthrate is disastrous, robots will pick up the slack.

Don’t let them tell you we need immigrants.

We need to get these sluts in line. Ultimately, we need to completely ban all forms of birth control.

However, even if we don’t do that, there is not going to be an economic fallout.

And if there was an “economic fallout,” what does that even mean?

According to the survey, over 50% of South Korean women aged 20 to 34 think marriage & childbirth are not important in a woman’s life, far higher than 26% of men who believe so, suggesting a wide gap between the country’s young men & women over their views on the roles of women.

— Hawon Jung (@allyjung) February 26, 2023

The study’s findings echo those of another recent survey of young South Koreans. It showed 65% of women – compared to 48% among men – didn’t want a child, and the respondents who had experienced gender discrimination were far less likely to want a child than those who hadn’t.

— Hawon Jung (@allyjung) February 26, 2023

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

WOMEN DO LESS WORK THAN MEN!

THEY GET PAID MORE THAN MEN FOR THE WORK THEY DO!

Reuters:

Women in Germany earned 18% less on average than men last year, due largely to a levelling-off in earnings after having children and taking part-time work, the Federal Statistics Office said on Thursday.

The data show that the gender pay gap in Europe’s biggest economy has remained unchanged since 2020. That is down from 23% when records started in 2006.

On an adjusted basis, the gender pay gap for 2023 was 6%, said the office.

Women’s earnings start to stagnate from the age of 30 years, the average age for women to have their first child in Germany, said the office, while men continue to earn more.

The pay gap is the fakest thing since the Holocaust.

It’s too much.

Too much!

OWNED.

Former Australian senator David Leyonhjelm destroys Gender Pay Gap activists.

When people argue for these principles – 99% of the time the data they are using is either intentionally misrepresented or not properly collected and conveyed.

There are lies, damn lies,… pic.twitter.com/Xp96q6UoJC

— American Archer (@CalenArcher) January 15, 2024