OH WOW, A POLITICIAN IS DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN THEY SAID THEY WOULD DO WHEN THEY WERE RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

CNBC:

The White House on Sunday defended its decision to not target Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman after a U.S. intelligence report linked the royal to the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

“Historically and even in recent history, Democratic and Republican administrations, there have not been sanctions put in place for the leaders of foreign governments where we have diplomatic relations and even where we don’t have diplomatic relations,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” program.

The interviewer, Dana Bash, who is Jewish, did not bring up the fact that multiple foreign leaders are currently under sanction, including the leader of Iran, who never kidnapped and chopped up a Washington Post journalist at an embassy in Turkey, or chopped up any journalist at all at any embassy.

“We believe there are more effective ways to make sure that this doesn’t happen again and also to leave room to work with the Saudis on areas where there is mutual agreement,” Psaki said.

“That is what diplomacy looks like. That is what a complicated global engagement looks like and we’ve made no secret and have been clear that we are going to hold them accountable on the global stage,” Psaki said, adding that the administration took steps through the Treasury and State Department.

When he was running for president, Joe Biden said he would hold senior Saudi leaders accountable for Khashoggi’s death, calling the kingdom’s leadership a “pariah” that had “very little social redeeming value.”

No one likes the Saudis, naturally.

The average Democrat voter doesn’t understand that they are the great ally of Israel, and therefore get special privileges.

The whole thing was framed as being more evil by Donald Trump. Jeff Bezos actually wrote an article about how it was Trump’s fault that the Saudi Prince tried to blackmail him with nudes (which he did after hacking his phone). That was a really weird story. Jeff Bezos, we learned, is a horrible writer (which I found somewhat surprising, actually).

Anyway, Trump couldn’t do anything to break ties with Saudi Arabia for the same reason Biden can’t do anything to break ties with Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabia is the key to the Israeli plan to form of “Middle East Union,” based on the European Union, which will actually be what they’ve described as “Greater Israel.” Prince Salman is the man for the job, but is regrettably unhinged and can’t deal with some nerd writing mean stuff about him, and thinks he’s the king of the world.

Hacking Jeff Bezos’ phone (using software he bought from Israelis, by the way) was actually worse than killing a journalist. You can see how chopping up a journalist may be deemed necessary, but cellphones are intimate and should be protected. The idea that the richest man on earth can have his nudes compromised is terrifying.

To be fair, however, if Salman really wanted Khashogghi dead, he could have just had a crate of donuts delivered to his house every day, and he’d have gone into a diabetic coma within a week.

What a dumb, fat nerd.

The thing about bullying a nerd this aggressively was that it gives the nerd relevance beyond what he deserved.

By the way, Khashogghi was promoting the Brotherhood of Islam, lol. That just adds a whole other layer of weird onto this, no?

In a normal situation, not only would Saudi be sanctioned, Bezos would be brought in and questioned as to why he was promoting the Brotherhood of Islam in the first place. The hearings would of course open with Jerrold Nadler: “sir, I was very sorry to hear about your nudes, and this is a travesty. Your TRT program seems to be working great though, and I found your form very impressive. Respectfully, I did not look at any photos where your penis was visible, although I can’t say I wasn’t tempted.”

It’s an incredible thing though, to have this Psaki woman on CNN saying “well, yes, he chopped up a journalist in an embassy and hacked Bezos nudes, but we think it’s normal to just let him do that without it affecting our diplomatic relations.”

I’m the number one person who says “what other countries do inside their country is none of our business,” but this guy was living in another allied country, Turkey, and was a former resident of the US, working for an American paper.

It seems like he should at least be asked to apologize to… the Moslem Brotherhood? Or no wait, he should apologize to the world for putting us through this strange ordeal. And Bezos should apologize to the world for promoting the Moslem Brotherhood. And so should the CIA. And, Bezos should apologize for saying this was a Trump conspiracy. But yes, the National Enquirer (which is Jewish, run at the time by David Pecker), should apologize for blackmailing Bezos.

Well, this is a doozy.

I doubt it will get much traction – you can’t attack a Moslem or a woman, especially one whose Jew husband is a serial adulterer. Presumably a lot of journalists must have known about this for years and just didn’t pursue it.

But it’s very interesting to me personally.

And I’m sure many of you all – or as I often like to say, “yall” or “yall muffugguhs.”

New York Post:

Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.

One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign Web site is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee.

However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-First Lady Clinton.

Clinton met the mom.

This was in Saudi Arabia in 2010.

So apparently she approves of her daughter working for a radical feminist.

Wonder why?

What do you think?

Maybe her daughter gave her some different reasons why she was working for Madam Clinton, huh?

Headlined “Women’s Rights are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped

“A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,” the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League, asserted, while warning of “the dangers of alternative lifestyles.” (Abedin’s journal was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.)

“Pushing [mothers] out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood,” it added.

HA!

In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women.

“‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained, while forcefully arguing in favor of Islamic laws that have been roundly criticized for oppressing women.

“By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.”

“Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender,” she claimed. “Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members.”

She seemed to rationalize domestic abuse as a result of “the stress and frustrations that men encounter in their daily lives.” While denouncing such violence, she didn’t think it did much good to punish men for it.

She added in her 31-page treatise: “More men are victims of domestic violence than women . . . If we see the world through ‘men’s eyes’ we will find them suffering from many hardships and injustices.”

HAHAHAHA!

No wonder Moslems are conquering our countries! They’ve got women and home who think like this!

She opposed the UN conference widening the scope of the definition of the family to include “gay and lesbian ‘families.’ ”

Huma Abedin does not apologize for her mother’s views. “My mother was traveling around the world to these international women’s conferences talking about women’s empowerment, and it was normal,” she said in a recent profile in Vogue.

Huma continued to work for her mother’s journal through 2008. She is listed as “assistant editor” on the masthead of the 2002 issue in which her mother suggested the US was doomed to be attacked on 9/11 because of “sanctions” it leveled against Iraq and other “injustices” allegedly heaped on the Muslim world. Here is an excerpt:

“The spiral of violence having continued unabated worldwide, and widely seen to be allowed to continue, was building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker that was kept on a vigorous flame while the lid was weighted down with various kinds of injustices and sanctions . . . It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve.”

Huma Abedin is Clinton’s longest-serving and, by all accounts, most loyal aide. The devout, Saudi-raised Muslim started working for her in the White House, then followed her to the Senate and later the State Department. She’s now helping run Clinton’s presidential campaign as vice chair and may end up back in the White House.

So, there are two possibilities here, I guess.

Either Huma went rebel in her early 30s (she is 40 now), or she is a complete plant, working for the Islamic agenda inside of the Clinton operation. The evidence shows that the latter is the case.

For instance, she started working for Clinton when she was 20, in 1996. That was before she started publishing Saudi journals against her feminist agenda.

We also have her mother, a devout Moslem, apparently comfortable with Clinton. She also didn’t disown her daughter when she married the Jew Weiner.

No wonder she laughed off her husband sending dick-pics to everyone he meets – it’s a sham marriage of a terrorist infiltrator!

Also, her dead father, her mother and her brother have all been linked to the Moslem Brotherhood, and 5 GOP Congressmen actually wrote a letter documenting this and claiming it meant she shouldn’t have State Department security clearances. The Moslem Brotherhood has stated that their plan is to destroy the United States from within.

I’d say this is pretty cut and dry.

She’s a jihadi plant.

I hope Trump hits this. Though maybe with his new phase, it isn’t the appropriate time.

This story is huge, but as I say, I just don’t know how much traction it will get. Besides her being double-protected class, the whole thing sounds goofy and insane, like a chemtrails-tier conspiracy theory.

But I don’t really see any other explanation for this situation than that this woman is literally a Islamic terrorist infiltrator, like out of a spy movie.