Elizabeth Warren this week called for student loan debt to be almost completely abolished.

Apparently, this would cost $640 billion dollars.

The WaPo Editorial Board is as against this plan as the Republican establishment.

Washington Post:

TRAILING IN the polls, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is running ahead of the Democratic presidential pack in terms of policy specifics. We hope other candidates will emulate her willingness to lay out an agenda. Alas, her latest big idea — to eliminate vast quantities of student debt and make public universities tuition-free — is not a sound idea.

The nation’s households owe almost $1.5 trillion in student loans, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This represents a burden on many families, which, under Ms. Warren’s plan, would disappear completely for 75 percent of them, and at least partially for 95 percent. That’s because she would forgive debts up to $50,000 — just over twice the average federal student loan balance, $23,000. And she would do so for borrowers with a household income under $100,000 — some 80 percent of the population. Even borrowers earning up to $250,000 would be eligible for some relief, which would total $640 billion overall. Free college would add $600 billion or so more, for a total price tag over 10 years of $1.25 trillion.

No one can accuse Ms. Warren of thinking small. What she really needs is a better sense of proportion. Her premise seems to be that student debt is all burden and no benefit, but this is not true: It represents an investment in skill acquisition that pays substantial long-term benefits. President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers estimated this lifetime “earnings premium” at about $1 million over a worker with only a high school education. It’s not unfair to expect people to pay back their loans out of that income. What might be unfair is debt relief to the exclusion of other priorities with wider benefits, including to people who did not go to college at all. Ms. Warren proposes a wealth tax to cover the cost, the proceeds of which would then not be available for alternative, possibly more progressive uses. In any case, default rates are actually falling slightly, according to the latest Education Department figures; 84.7 percent of borrowers were current on their obligations as of the end of 2017, according to the New York Fed.

That is, of course, all complete bullshit.

They go on to say that the plan would help out the middle class, and that actually, we should be giving all of this money to poor brown people and immigrants.

I personally do not support giving money to poor brown people. Part of it is that I just don’t really care about poor brown people, but a bigger part of it is that we know for a fact that giving money to poor brown people does not do anything to make them less poor. They waste whatever money we give them and they just stay poor.

Middle class millennials who owe insane amounts of student loan debt, however, are people who have the ability to contribute to society, but were simply swindled by a scam. They were told that if they went to college, the student loan debt would quickly pay itself off because they would make so much more money than if they didn’t go to college. That was a lie, in almost every case.

The student loan program allowed so many people to go to college that the college degrees became worthless, and people with college degrees were forced to work at jobs that historically they would not have needed a college degree for, getting paid the same – usually less, in fact – than the previous generation had gotten for working jobs with no college degree. So it became impossible to pay back these loans.

The whole thing was a gigantic scam.

The social sciences degrees in particular are a literal Ponzi scheme.

The only thing you can do with a humanities degree is work in a humanities department at a university. Seriously, who else is going to hire someone with a degree in history, philosophy, literature or sociology? Pretty much their only option is to become journalists making $30,000 a year (half of what an electrician or a plumber without any student loans makes).

tfw $30,000 a year at 55, universally hated and viewed as a pathetic failure, your father thinks you’re a disgrace

tfw $55,000 a year at 28, having a fun time working with your hands, driving around in a van listening to podcasts, visiting people’s houses and chatting and probably they make you a sandwich

So the people coming in are paying for the salaries of the people who have gotten faculty jobs at the university, even while it is known that no matter how much they expand the staffs of these departments, there aren’t ever going to be enough positions for all the people getting those degrees.

Blaming the Victim

The Republicans have chosen to frame the victims of this scam as lazy, saying that they should have built a ladder to the upper echelons of society out of bootstraps and if they can’t get a job with their worthless college degrees it’s because they don’t have firm enough handshakes. This is simply disgusting.

The WaPo – which represents the mainline Democrat view – frames them as privileged whites who deserve to suffer. This is also disgusting.

There is little difference between these two positions, in fact.

These people are propagandized from the time they are in elementary school, being told that their entire future is dependent on going to college. Their boomer parents back up the education system on this. Expecting teenagers to make these kinds of decisions and then blaming them for doing what they were told to do is evil.

The issue that I have with Warren’s plan is that she wants the taxpayers to foot the bill for the student loan forgiveness. But the taxpayers are not the ones who ran this scam. This scam was run by the universities themselves as well as the banks involved in issuing the loans.

Most of the student loan debt is currently owned by the federal government (and it appears that even the debt they don’t own is guaranteed by them). So apparently, the thinking is that the easiest thing would be to stick the taxpayers with the bill for loan forgiveness.

However, it is much more fair and much more fiscally reasonable to force the universities to pay off this debt. The official number of subsidies that the US government gave universities in 2015 was $80 billion. That said, although the numbers are unclear, when you factor in all the other ways that they get money through these various confusing programs, the number is probably twice that (of course I am excluding student loans in these numbers).

But if we just take the number of $80 billion, that means that the US government could recoup the $1.25 trillion in 15 years by cutting all subsidies to universities.

Without all of this money that the universities receive from the federal government and from the student loan scam, they would be forced to drastically cut these absurdly inflated tuition costs, making it viable for people who want to go to universities for STEM education to figure out a way to pay for it by getting money from their parents and working part time jobs (as every baby boomer who attended university managed to do).

Furthermore, they would be forced to simply abolish all of these pointless “social sciences” courses that are entirely funded by the overinflated tuition costs created by the student loan racket.

University faculty attempting to escape with their social sciences tuition money

You would then have a situation where fewer people felt obligated to go to college in order to ensure an ability to make a living, which would have so many positive effects that they are almost impossible to list off.

But there are a few:

• People would be able to start families with their high school sweethearts, which is the natural way of human breeding
• Women would not be involved in the college “fuckfest” that turns them into total irredeemable whores
• Women would not be brainwashed into believing they have a moral imperative to rule over and destroy men
• All of these worthless women working as college faculty would be out of work, and forced to find men to support them
• The soyboy phenomenon would be completely destroyed, as weak-willed, low testosterone and dull-minded men would not be subjected to “colonial theory”
• The entire headquarters of globohomo, which is the university social science departments, would disappear

And you can think of the rest.

Free College is a Nonsense Plot

The calls for “free college,” which Bernie popularized and Warren also supports, assume that college is good or useful, when in reality, 90% of the degrees have no actual value.

The only person I have heard saying this is Andrew Yang.

The under employment rate for recent college graduates is 44%.

College as a solution to society is absolutely nonsensical. It was a stupid idea to begin with, but we now know that it has failed, so this idea that the problem is getting more people into college is simply looking at the problem completely wrong.

Yang is unlikely to be the nominee.

A few months ago, I was tentatively predicting that Kamala would be the nominee, and that is increasingly looking totally impossible. Right now, it actually looks like Bernie is going to be the nominee.

What I would like to see is Bernie embrace some of these policies being put forward by Yang.

He probably won’t, but that would at this point be ideal. However, even if Bernie did abandon the “college is the most important thing ever of all” philosophy he is promoting, I do not think he would be up for forcing colleges to pay for this loan scam, as being that he is a communist, he believes that everything can be paid for by the government.

This might be out of date, I hear China is getting nicer every day

This being Canada, I really don’t understand what the fuss is all about. Just take a napkin, put a sticker of a leaf on one side, then draw a dick that squirts “love is love” on the other side, and say it’s a transnumeral paper that identifies as 12K Canadian Dollars. Problem solved.

But nobody thought about this, because they’re not geniuses like I am.

Fox News:

A Canadian landlord who was fined $12,000 for wearing shoes in a Muslim tenant’s home said he felt “humiliated” by the harsh penalty levied by a national human rights tribunal.

Human rights tribunal… Orwell is spinning like a dreidel in his grave.

BTW, 12,000 Canadian dollars is almost 10K real dollars.

In an interview with the Toronto Sun, John Alabi, 52, of Brampton, recounted how he went above and beyond trying to accommodate the Egyptian-born couple who lived in the apartment for two months – just to be slapped with a steep fine for the shoe incident.

“I go beyond all that. I just see everybody as human beings like me. That’s why I took them in,” Alabi told the Toronto Sun in May. “We got along. And then all of a sudden I’m a racist?”

That was your first mistake, faggot.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ordered Alabi in April to pay the tenants $6,000 each after he failed to take his shoes off in the bedroom were the couple prayed while he was showing the home to potential renters. The couple, who moved into first floor of the home in December 2014, terminated their lease on Feb. 28, 2015.

The tribunal also said Alabi “harassed” the couple and “created a poisoned housing environment.” Though he would give them 24-hour notice of the showing, he would often fail to provide a 5-minute warning, according to the Toronto Sun.

This is what they call genocide in Canada.

“I was humiliated, I was made to feel I have no rights, I was made to feel that I’m not wanted in society,” Alabi said. “I feel powerless. They rented my place for only two months. Two months! It’s just not fair.”

You’re just angry that your irrational hatred for the carpet has been exposed! EXPOSED!!!

I can’t believe things like this still happen in current year

Alabi told the news site the couple never had an issue when he wore his shoes in the home to do repairs.Then they filed a grievance eight months after the last incident, the Toronto Sun reported.

Yeah… They did that on purpose.

“I have been victimized,” Alabi said. “They are using their religion to victimize me.”

That’s what it’s supposed to do, you fucking retard.

Racial aspects aside, Islam is not like other religions. It’s a religions whose clear and very explicit purpose is the subjugation or extermination of all non-Moslems on the face of the earth. There is no such thing as “sin” against an infidel, you can kill them, rob them, rape them, torture them, do anything you want unless they are your explicit servants. That’s the difference between Islam and every other religion except Judaism, which says basically the same except they don’t want to convert anybody.

“I don’t have the money. I work very hard. If they go into my bank account right now, I don’t have $12,000 there,” Alabi said, adding that he has rented the space for 15 years to help pay his mortgage.

Last week news site Rebel News Service launched a crowdfunding page to help Alabi pay for the fine. 

Some of you have probably already stuck your hands in your pockets to donate. Please don’t. Alabi is a name only used among Arab Christians and some strain of nigger from Niggeria, so whatever this creature is, it’s probably just an invader like the other subhumans who are trying to extort it. If you have money to spare, donate to people who are actually on your side, like this site.

Aside from that – Canada is really bad. Like really really bad. They might threaten Sweden’s place as Top Cuck Nation if they were a real country. The only thing that can solve their problems is a real Holocaust, and that’s coming. It’s coming very soon. And there is no escape.

It’s coming

A “Pick-Up Artist” (PUA) is someone who is good at seducing girls. “Game” is the whole spectrum of techniques these PUA guys are employing.

Over the last couple of years, the PUA community has grown enormously and has become increasingly organized. It has become a real industry, with e-books, CD’s, seminars of $1,500 per person and many internet forums.

Damage to Our Society

This PUA industry has little or nothing to do with the traditional mating process between boys and girls, men and women. Spontaneity and sincere feelings of being in love have been replaced by a business-like “numbers-game” of harassing dozens of women, in which smiles, remarks, touches, etc. are nothing more than techniques in “closing the game,” – in other words, getting to sleep with the girl.

The so-called ‘Masters of Pick Up’ gurus, mostly Jews, are only interested in selling their products and passing on their malicious ideology to insecure boys and young men. It is a scam. They play on the weaknesses of their customers, on their fears they will never to be able to score a girl.  The Jews are offering them all sorts of alleged secret methods, for a lot of money, that have little chance of actually working anyway.

They don’t want to help you, they only want to sell to you. They aren’t that good with the ladies themselves, but their marketing skills make up for that.

Young men in the “PUA community” are encouraged to begin as many superficial relationships and sex-dates as possible with all kinds of girls, of all races. The body count is more important than the quality of the relations or of the women. Women are only objects of lust and most other men are only ‘AFCs’ (Average Frustrated Chumps).

The industry imposes a worldview, through which the Jews do immeasurable damage to the emotional development of many young men.

The Alpha-Man

The pickup gurus tell us that boys should act like assholes towards girls – they should act like arrogant, egocentric pricks. Acting like that is, as they say it, “alpha” and gets you the girls. Well, arrogance isn’t a mark of good character and sleeping with or making out with lots of STD-sluts from the dance club doesn’t make one more “alpha.” Real men see their wife or girlfriend as a valuable person, and will do all they can to be someone to be a reliable partner and father.

Instead of devoting their lives to “Game,” these young men should invest their energy in things that really matter. In work, in good books, in culture, in a good education, in a healthy relationship and in starting a family. This will be of much better use to their nation, their people and to themselves.

A List of Jews

These are the five most influential people in the PUA industry – they are all Jews.

Neil Strauss, reporter of the Rolling Stone Magazine. With his book The Game he marked the beginning of the enormous growth of the PUA community.

Ross Jeffries, once “the father of the PUA-movement,” now a filthy old man. He mainly speaks about Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), an over-hyped method that he claims will help you seduce women in no-time, simply by your choice of words.

David deAngelo  is  NOT a romantic Italian who speaks from his own experience with Mediterranean beauties. No, it is the nomme de plum of Eben Pagan, a Jew with a marketing background. He is the author of the e-book Double Your Dating, a thin booklet that promises much and delivers little. He also offers lots of seminars, records them and sells the recordings on DVD and CD.

Robert Greene, author of The Art of Seduction, is also well-known for his 48 Laws of Power book, where he instructs people as to how to manipulate others to gain influence.

The PUA industry can be compared to multilevel marketing and other get-rich-quick-schemes. Everyone knows those annoying ads saying “Single mum earns $500 a day from home, click here.” They play on people’s greed and fear. A lot is promised, but the product you get is pretty worthless.

Why the Jews Do This

Jews do their utmost best to poison absolutely every aspect of the society. First they poison the women with feminism, then they offer their PUA merchandise to the men frustrated by arrogant feminists.

They Jews have a lot to gain. Firstly they earn a lot from the PUA industry. If you didn’t get it by now, it’s a terribly commercial industry, in which they try to offer you more crap every two seconds.  Jewish lawyers earn from divorces and Jewish banks from the increased materialism. Singles who are constantly looking for more “status” to convince the females they are “alpha,” spend more, and thus borrow more. Apart from that, the dangerous PUA worldview causes a decrease in cohesion in society and more poisonous individualism.

“Diversity is our strength” is what the Jews say, because only when everyone only cares about himself the Jews will remain as the only cohesive force. The PUA industry is also breaking down the traditional family. People marry later, use money for clubbing or buying “alpha” items, fornicate more, divorce more, have less children and more children grow up in broken households. This all is in the interest of the Jew, who flourishes in a individualistic, materialistic society, wherein everything, no matter how wrong or depraved, is accepted.