Nick Fuentes appeared on the MILO show over the weekend, and it was quite the thing.

For those who don’t recall, Milo was the star writer at Breitbart when Steve Bannon was in charge, and he was the third person banned from Twitter (after Chuck Johnson and me). He was doing a college tour promoting Donald Trump, and he was putting on a good show. Then journalists colluded to hoax that he’d promoted pederasty, when in fact all he did was describe the fact that homosexual men prey on teenage boys.

He was fired from Breitbart and exiled from the conservative movement. They did the hitjob because he was saying things you’re not supposed to say, and it was making some people nervous. He was completely removed from public life.

I haven’t seen him in years, and here he is on YouTube, doing some kind of bizarre world talk show, which is apparently being produced by Gavin McInnes.

The first thing you will notice is that Milo is a slovenly disaster. He has gotten fat and he is moving into a hunched posture in a gross way. He is also still trying to do his mischievous queen bit, even though he is much too old, and it is highly inappropriate.

I mean, I’ve always thought flamboyant homosexuality was inappropriate in any setting, but I’m saying it is inappropriate within our present cultural paradigm.

It’s time to take on a more demure tone, Milo. You’re too fat and old for the cutesy twink bit.

Yikes.

He looks like he’s morphing into some sick alternate dimension version of an out of shape, post-plastic surgery Jean-Claude Van Damme.

The second thing you will notice is that Milo, gone broke after having his career destroyed by the Jews, can no longer afford cocaine and has switched to gin and tonics, which has resulted in him lacking in sharpness as much as he is lacking in slimness. His wit is as swollen and pulsating as his cherry pink drunk face.

The poor bastard. He’s hanging out with Gavin McInnes and they’re producing low quality internet TV shows that are a tribute to 1990s Public Access TV. But they don’t seem to be aware that this is what they are making a tribute to. The whole thing appears to be unironic.

The third thing you will notice is that he is doing some kind of stilted Jim Carrey style physical comedy performance.

Maybe this is something to do with the crisis of the aging queen. Maybe when they get to be in their thirties, and the cutesy thing starts to drag, they revert to acting like Ace Ventura. I’ve not studied the phenomenon closely, but it is damn weird, I can tell you that.

Which I’m not against. Physical comedy is fine. The problem is that the energy of it is so forced that it takes the desperation from his eyes – where desperation should always remain caged – and spreads it throughout his entire aura.

And combining it with that hair and those clothes – this is like a black hole of a lack of basic self-awareness.

I feel bad for Milo.

I’ve always felt bad for Milo. Since the thing. The hit.

I think the internet was a better place when Milo was around.

The friends we met along the way, and so on.

I had my issues with the way he tried to spin 2015 Pepe memes into some libertarian gibberish and then put his own brand label on it, but he didn’t deserve to be banned anymore than anyone else deserved to be banned.

Sitting here watching this poor aging queen try to scrape out a living after being assassinated by a media hit job that took his entire career away from him brings sadness upon me.

He’s given up on ever trying to have a real career, he’s just running this to eat. He’s totally beaten and broken. It sucks he’s such a horrible writer without his team at Breitbart. He could write books that Gen X conservative women would buy. But he was always just a performer who needed a team to back him up, and now no one will pay for the team.

Oh, and Nick Fuentes is interviewed here. Because Milo is doing whatever he can to try and gain relevance, just get a couple of new followers, just get some money and attention.

I guess the lesson here is: don’t ever set up a life that is completely dependent on other people who are not your family. And always have an exit strategy.

You don’t want to be in a position where anyone can accurately describe you as “a shadow of his former self.”

It always turns my stomach when some conservative laments the current state at free speech at Berkeley with the qualifier that the school is the “birth place of the free speech movement” – a reference to the hippie movement of the sixties.

With the exception of Mario Savio (who was chosen to be spokesman to throw the goyim off the Hebrew trail), the free speech movement was populated entirely by Jewish communists: Jack Weinberg, a bunch of people with the surname Goldberg, Steve Weissman, etc. I believe the Vietnam war was wrong, just like the poverty of peasants that led to the inept Czar’s overthrow in Russia was wrong, but Jews always jump on an exoteric good cause to garner popular support for an esoteric bad one. In this case, Cultural Marxism pushed through under the umbrella “free speech.”

That free speech was only for themselves, as a means to an end, which was to suppress the normal majority. Today’s college campus environment is exactly what Jack Weinberg, Allen Ginsburg and all the other 1960s Yids wanted all along. The generation they recruited now controls these institutions, and Jews themselves hold a firm grip on the elite schools.

Boston Magazine:

The Higher Education Research Institute has asked tens of thousands of professors nationwide if they agree or disagree with the notion that colleges should prohibit racist and sexist speech on campus. Nationally, 33 percent of faculty strongly agreed with the idea of speech prohibition, while 12 percent strongly disagreed. The remaining 55 percent of faculty were in the middle, where they somewhat agreed or somewhat disagreed with the idea.

Beneath the disguise of civility (an underhanded manipulation of Anglo-Saxon culture), college has become an extended high school indoctrination center for most young Americans. Because labels like “racist,” “sexist” and “homophobic” are made up gobbledygook, now it’s prohibited to, let’s say, argue that male and female are biological realities and transsexuals are just insane.

An anatomy textbook is really no different than Mein Kampf – a tool of the patriarchy designed to reinforce discredited positions of privilege.

None of this is actually about protecting people’s feelings. While conservatives are right that people on campus are snowflakes, that’s besides the point. The real reason Jews across the nation mandate or encourage a shutdown of free speech in our academic culture is so (((Stephen Jay Gould’s))) intellectual alchemy Mismeasure of Man can defeat Charles Murray’s hard science in The Bell Curve without actually having to pit weak Jewish ideas against strong and convincing ones.

Better to just get a mob of underlings to beat up the guy arguing his case, in the mind of Jewish thugs like the ones at the SPLC, who put Murray on their various lists.

That’s not to say I agree with all of Charles Murray’s findings, but he’s right on the racial link to IQ – Gould is simply a standard Jewish liar. It’s not that Jews and their liberals don’t want to allow free speech, it’s that they can’t. If we all had the equal right to speak our minds that the Constitution guarantees, we’d be in power and the New York Times editorial board would be forced to make Aliyah.

Everyone hates Bill Maher, and with good reason. But one thing that he deserves respect for is his fairly consistent support for freedom of speech, as well as his willingness to host guests and say things that make his audience start vomiting their granola in outrage. Maher has hosted a number of otherwise black listed figures, from ex-CIA Jew critic Michael Scheuer to even fairly pro-white Jim Goad on both Real Time and its previous iteration, Politically Incorrect.

Maher let’s you on the ride, but usually stacks his panels with Jews (Karen Finley and Michael Rappaport in Goad’s case) in order to dog pile you.

On Friday, Maher is slated to host (((MILO))), who is basically trying to sabotage the alt-right (a grassroots movement where the cue ball’s English is given by true-believing National Socialists) and drag it back to safe faileo-conservativism. Because Yiannopolous once worked for Steve Bannon at Breitbart, his otherwise run of the mill liberal capitalist ideology and disgusting homosexual habits that he candidly talks about is rationalized as “Fascism” by emotionally incontinent Leftists who flip out at the mere mention of Donald Trump being the President.

Even though Milo Yiannopolous exists specifically to contain the explosion in pro-white and anti-Jew ideas, the Judeo-Bolshevist habit of repeating a lie (“Milo is a Fascist”) until it becomes gospel is hilariously sapping them of strength and making them look like the mental midgets they are.

Here is Jeremy Scahill invoking “no platform” and ordering a lynch mob against Maher for plans to bring (((MILO))) on.

Why I will not appear this week on Real Time with Bill Maher. pic.twitter.com/SOoE3udrDr

— jeremy scahill (@jeremyscahill) February 15, 2017

It appears that Scahill is trying to vote Maher off Judeo-Leftist island. The Jews and fellow travelers have basically rallied behind Maher in recent years because he’s the only Leftist who you can actually sell as funny (although his stuff since Trump was elected has suffered due to his very palpable fear) or capable of putting forward a good argument with cross-aisle appeal.

Nevertheless, this could be the first shot in a civil war within the institutional Left. With voices like Bill Maher’s being drowned out by those with a disposition that is increasingly marginalized, puerile and intolerant, nobody will complain when our side rises up to crush them.

Mr Scahill, as you can tell from his pretentious try-hard Twitter selfies, is a pile of soft stool whose upper class helicopter parents ensured he would never have to face adversity. But he’s just putting off the inevitable. If he thinks (((MILO))) is too difficult to debate, wait until he sees what comes next.