South Korea’s parliament on Saturday failed to pass an #impeachment motion against President Yoon Suk-yeol as most of the ruling People Power Party lawmakers refused to vote on it. pic.twitter.com/sd8JSxdhn5

— China Xinhua News (@XHNews) December 7, 2024

South Korea’s main liberal opposition Democratic Party said Sunday that it will try to push for a vote to impeach President Yoon Suk-yeol every Saturday following a botched impeachment attempt. pic.twitter.com/DdcqivjT5j

— China Xinhua News (@XHNews) December 9, 2024

Previously: South Korea: Choker President Apologizes for Martial Law, Vows to Never Do It Again 

The sonovabitch pulled it off.

I’ll be damned.

Reuters:

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol is still commander in chief and there is no disruption to the U.S. alliance, the defence ministry said on Monday after it was revealed Yoon was under criminal investigation for declaring martial law last week.

Yoon’s grip on power has come into question with dissent growing among senior military officers against the president, and his own party saying it would establish a task force to handle his eventual resignation.

While Yoon survived an impeachment vote in parliament on Saturday, his party’s decision to delegate presidential authority to the prime minister has plunged the key U.S. ally into a constitutional crisis.

Yoon has refused calls, including some from within his own ruling party, to resign, but his future looked more uncertain over the weekend when Yonhap news agency reported he was under criminal investigation for alleged treason.

Police were also considering banning him from leaving the country, Yonhap and other media reported on Monday.

Prosecutors on Sunday arrested ex-Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun over his alleged role in the declaration of martial law, Yonhap reported.

They’re saying the prime minister has the power now, but if that were the case, the prime minister would just remove the president. Yoon still has the power, and he has only one option: to declare martial law again, and this time hold the line and start summarily executing politicians and protesters.

Obviously, no one really has that big of a problem with this, given that he was not impeached.

Worst case, he does it again and then apologizes again and nothing happens. If you can get away with it once, you can obviously get away with it twice.

We still have not found a conspiracy behind this situation, and it really seems like Yoon just wanted to be a dictator because he thought it would be simple. You don’t have to be a political expert to look at history and see that every democracy ends up with some kind of dictatorship. It’s just the natural flow of things.

If you say that Erdogan hoaxed last year’s coup he will order your head cut off!

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has marked the anniversary of a failed military coup by threatening to behead traitors. They held a rally and unveiled a monument in Istanbul to commemorate the occasion. He definitely wanted to make a big deal about this.

Independent:

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has vowed to behead traitors in an emotional address to tens of thousands of people on the first anniversary of the country’s failed military coup.

Mr Erdogan told the vast, flag-waving crowd the attempt to end his more than a decade-long rule was “not the first attack against our country, and it won’t be the last”.

“Exactly a year ago today, around this hour, a treacherous attempt took place,” he said.

Then, referring to a series of terror attacks that hit Turkey over the last year, he added: “For that reason, we’ll first cut the heads off of these traitors.”

Mr Erdogan took part in a national unity march in Istanbul, converging at the July 15 Martyrs’ Bridge, formally called the Bosphorus Bridge, to remember 250 people who died on this day last year trying to resist the coup.

This is all very funny considering that there’s a great deal of evidence to indicate that Erdogan staged the coup himself in order to humiliate and discredit the Turkish military. This was primarily because of how disorganized and dysfunctional it was. They even tried to blame some dude in Pennsylvania for orchestrating it. The whole situation was extremely goofy and weird.

What we can say for certain is that Erdogan gained the most from it. He consolidated power and ordered massive purges.

When the situation was unfolding, Andrew Anglin penned an article analyzing how it was most likely a hoax staged by Erdogan. The article generated tremendous interest in Turkey. Other stories detailing how it was probably a hoax were featured on Matt Drudge’s website and others. This was hardly a fringe view when it happened.

Unfortunately, none of this matters now. If you question the official coup narrative, Erdogan has said that he’ll cut off your head!

This bitch is the last person who should be hoping for a military coup.

The basic purpose of a blitzkrieg is to overwhelm the enemy with quick strikes on many fronts, so as to confuse and paralyze them. This is exactly what we’re seeing now.

Look at the behavior of all these leftists and Jews. They’ve lost it. They’re panicked. They can barely string together coherent sentences.

They’re afraid.

Daily Mail:

Comedian Sarah Silverman appeared to call for a military coup in a tweet last night, as protests against far-right Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos turned violent.

‘WAKE UP & JOIN THE RESISTANCE. ONCE THE MILITARY IS W US FASCISTS GET OVERTHROWN. MAD KING & HIS HANDLERS GO BYE BYE,’ Silverman wrote.

Later she added: ‘We’re all gonna die sounds so dire but we are though (all gonna die).’

Trump supporters and conservatives were quick to tear Silverman’s tweet to shreds, calling for her to be arrested for treason and even using anti-Semitic rhetoric against the Jewish stand-up comedian.

WAKE UP & JOIN THE RESISTANCE. ONCE THE MILITARY IS W US FASCISTS GET OVERTHROWN. MAD KING & HIS HANDLERS GO BYE BYE https://t.co/Y2WZbL012A

— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) February 2, 2017

We're all gonna die sounds so dire but we are though (all gonna die)

— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) February 2, 2017

Can you smell the fear? The terror? The Jews are starting to truly believe that “they’re all going to die” in some sort of new holocaust (for real, this time).

But instead of reacting in a coherent way to this perceived “threat,” we’re seeing Jews making big mistakes like Sarah here. Calling for a coup on twitter is definitely not a smart idea.

It’s not the first dumb thing the known pee-aficionado has done.

We should all give @SarahKSilverman a word of warning, or else she might continue down her downward spiral of self-destruction. She’s already dangerously close to being declared a subversive enemy of the state, after all.

Sarah Silverman’s been in the hot seat over her appeal to the military to overthrow Trump. Technically speaking, this is sedition, but because Silverman doesn’t realistically have the means or connections to make such a fantasy come true, it is protected free speech and isn’t prosecuted.

But that isn’t the case for Rosa Brooks, the daughter of the infamous communist Barbara Ehrenreich and the Jew John Ehrenreich. Brooks has scores of contacts with the US government and military: high-level work at Soros and Neo-Con (Council on Foreign Relations) think-tanks influential on the American deep state, functioned as an important advisor in the Obama Pentagon, and currently is married to Army Special Forces Colonel Joseph Mauer.

Brooks has the means and knowledge of the American apparatus to at least plan a military coup. Her husband, the recently retired (2015) Lieutenant Colonel Mauer is as fervently anti-Trump as she is, creating more than enough circumstantial evidence to launch an immediate investigation.

According to Title 18 U.S. Code 2385,

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

With that in mind, let’s read what Brooks wrote in the Jew-run Neo-Con unofficial mouth piece of the Council on Foreign Relations,  Foreign Policy Magazine. The context in which this is written is set by the title, “3 Ways To Get Rid of Donald Trump Before 2020.”

Foreign Policy:

The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.

The principle of civilian control of the military has been deeply internalized by the U.S. military, which prides itself on its nonpartisan professionalism. What’s more, we know that a high-ranking lawbreaker with even a little subtlety can run rings around the uniformed military. During the first years of the George W. Bush administration, for instance, formal protests from the nation’s senior-most military lawyers didn’t stop the use of torture. When military leaders objected to tactics such as waterboarding, the Bush administration simply bypassed the military, getting the CIA and private contractors to do their dirty work.

But Trump isn’t subtle or sophisticated: He sets policy through rants and late-night tweets, not through quiet hints to aides and lawyers. He’s thin-skinned, erratic, and unconstrained — and his unexpected, self-indulgent pronouncements are reportedly sending shivers through even his closest aides.

What would top U.S. military leaders do if given an order that struck them as not merely ill-advised, but dangerously unhinged? An order that wasn’t along the lines of “Prepare a plan to invade Iraq if Congress authorizes it based on questionable intelligence,” but “Prepare to invade Mexico tomorrow!” or “Start rounding up Muslim Americans and sending them to Guantánamo!” or “I’m going to teach China a lesson — with nukes!”

It’s impossible to say, of course. The prospect of American military leaders responding to a presidential order with open defiance is frightening — but so, too, is the prospect of military obedience to an insane order. After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” to thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board.

Brook’s article is carefully crafted to be as legalistic as possible, but don’t doubt the former government official’s not-so-subtle toxic intent. Her presentation of how the branches of government are meant to function is made up and meant to incite the prospect of military insurrection, ergo, “teaches the duty” of sedition (violation of Title 18 on sedition).

The United States is not a ‘Praetorian’ society like Argentina or Greece, the military is not an independent force legally tasked with the duty of “protecting” the Constitution or checking the government. The President is the de facto leader of the armed forces at all times, hence the title “Commander In Chief.”

The legal case here is at least as strong as the ones the Federal government have previously brought up against Matt Hale, Hal Turner (a federal agent entrapping people) and others for “threatening” a judge years ago. The days of a two-tier justice system must end, and the increasing insolence of American Jewry in their brazen calls to kill, overthrow and illegally undermine the election of President Trump must be crushed before it gains traction.

The SPLC has even been trying to find some way to silence the Daily Stormer through legally facile means (watch what you say in the comments section) over our criticism of the cabal of unelected officials who are trying to block Trump’s immigration order. We don’t go anywhere near calling for military coups or violence, and neither chief editor Andrew Anglin or any other journalist here has the means to execute such a conspiracy if we did – unlike Brooks.

Commander in Chief Trump and recently approved Attorney General Jeff Sessions must launch a federal investigation into Rosa Brooks and her Army Colonel husband.