Well, I’m glad to hear this problem is finally solved.

Great news.

The Guardian:

Sweeping changes to the EU’s migration laws have been passed in a knife-edge series of votes in the European parliament, with supporters of the new laws calling the move historic but NGOs saying they are a step back for human rights.

The vote on Wednesday, which is now expected to be rubber-stamped by the member states, ends eight years of deadlock over repeated efforts to tighten up border management and asylum processes in the 27-member bloc.

Champions of the laws, who had been campaigning to get the legislation passed in the face of a rise in popularity of the far right before the European parliament elections in June, seized on the move as a great victory.

They said it would fast-track asylum procedures at the EU’s border, impose tough new screening systems and return people who do not qualify for international protection to their countries.

Roberta Metsola, the European parliament president, wrote on X: “History made. We have delivered a robust legislative framework on how to deal with migration and asylum in the EU. It has been more than 10 years in the making. But we kept our word. A balance between solidarity and responsibility. This is the European way.”

However, tensions in the huge auditorium as the voting started betrayed the deeply divisive nature of the laws. Proceedings were interrupted by protesters dressed in white T-shirts in the public gallery, who shouted at MEPs: “This pact kills! Vote ‘no’!” while throwing paper planes carrying the coordinates of shipwrecks and refugees who have died at EU external borders.

I am shocked that most of the protesters are women

The home affairs commissioner, Ylva Johansson, who shepherded the legislation through, was defiant. “I feel proud … considering when I took office four and a half years ago, few thought we would make it,” she said.

Civil society groups, however, hit out at what Eve Geddie, Amnesty International’s head of the European institutions office and director of advocacy, called a “failure to show global leadership”.

…

Oxfam had earlier denounced the pact as a recipe for “deterrents, detention and deportation” rather than protection of human rights.

MEPs on the left and the Greens, who voted against eight of the 10 pieces of proposed legislation on the table, also criticised the bill for failing to prioritise guarantees for human rights.

Rightwing politicians had their own reasons for opposing the reforms, arguing that the new laws did not go far enough and would cause a spike in migration.

Among those that voted against parts of the asylum and migration pact were the French and Spanish far-right parties Rassemblement National and Vox, as well as the Polish nationalist populists Law & Justice, and Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz.

They had earlier denounced the 10-part pact as a licence for people-smugglers and a blow to member states’ sovereignty.

…

Sources who worked on the legislation said every member state could opt out of the relocation of migrants with measures allowing them instead to contribute “in kind with equipment or experts such as lawyers”.

In one of the most controversial measures they will also be allowed to pay €20,000 (£17,000) a head into a fund for those people they do not accept under the solidarity measure.

It’s sad about human rights.

I guess maybe this is pure evil?

Brussels legally raped Poland and Hungary by forcing through the #MigrationPact . So there will be no compromise on migration. Not today, and not in the upcoming years. We will defend our borders from migrants and from the Brussels bureaucrats as well! pic.twitter.com/YRR5IJfQKR

— Orbán Viktor (@PM_ViktorOrban) October 6, 2023

It’s interesting that the Polish government is just as “right wing” as the Hungarian government when it comes to literally any issue other than the war against Russia, and yet, these two countries get very different media coverage.

According to the media, Orban is a fascist dictator, while Poland is a heroic nation of freedom fighters.

They’re not honest at all about the reason for the distinction. Orban’s immigration policies are cited as proof that he is Donald Trump and Hitler incarnate. Poland has these same policies, and the media just doesn’t bother mentioning them.

The Guardian:

EU leaders have clashed again with Hungary after the country’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, insisted at a summit in Granada that it would not support proposed laws to deal with migration.

Poland also joined the protest, accusing Brussels of imposing a “diktat” on other member states regarding the proposed laws that would apply in the event of a sudden refugee crisis such as that of 2015, when more than 1 million people arrived in the EU from Syria and beyond.

Using provocative language on his way into the conference, Orbán described a deal without Hungary as an assault on his country because EU leaders had gone ahead with the laws without his or Poland’s support. He claimed that the laws – which have yet to be voted on – needed unanimous backing, but the European Council has publicly insisted only majority support was needed.

“If you are raped legally, forced to accept something you don’t like, how would you like to have a compromise and agreement? It’s impossible,” said Orbán.

Is that “provocative”?

Hungary is having people force their bodies on her and penetrate her against her will. That’s what “rape” means.

To avert a full-blown row threatening to overshadow the informal gathering in Spain, EU leaders agreed to remove a 119-word paragraph relating to the bloc’s general pledges on migration from the text of a final communique concluding their summit.

Instead they adopted a “Granada declaration” on other issues including the overall strategy for the bloc in coming years, with the president of the European Council, Charles Michel, issuing a separate “president’s statement” reaffirming the EU’s commitment to the proposed laws on migration.

The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, played down the Hungarian and Polish objections, telling reporters there was “broad support” at the summit for the proposed laws.

Ursula is the world’s first and foremost rapist.

All she ever does is force things on people. Significantly less than half of Europeans want mass immigration or the war in the Ukraine, but she forces it on them.

Hitler didn’t do this. Communist countries don’t do this. Democracy countries are the only countries that rape like this.

“There is a very good chance that it [the law on migration] will make it over the finish line,” she said. “The principle is there to address the root causes for migration and then to work along the whole migratory route that people take.”

“The basic message is yes, we need regular migration … we will not want people to risk their lives and lose a fortune to the smugglers and traffickers, but … to choose the safe pathways,” she added at a press conference.

Who is “we”?

It’s technocrats in Brussels.

Even in Germany, according to their own fake polls, only 41% of people support “to the last Ukrainian” thinking on the war. That number is the same in America.

We don’t have numbers on Poland, the most drastic pro-war country, but last month, the country stopped sending weapons to the Ukraine as a result of public outcry.

Support for replacement migration is much lower, with some countries having fewer than 20% support for this agenda.

No one wants this stuff. It is being forced on us, and because we live in a democracy, we have no recourse.

There is no voting on the issue. Ursula just tells you what she’s going to do to you.

The EU is not a system that functions on popular support. It is a group that rapes people.

See: AI to Make College Degrees Obsolete and Take Over Software Engineers’ Jobs, LinkedIn Says

The heat is on in #Brussels: the budget is a mess, the #MigrationPact has failed, and the Brusselian strategy on the Russia-Ukraine war is fundamentally flawed. In this situation, Hungary cannot support any budget amendment proposal. pic.twitter.com/IecgmwIMn8

— Orbán Viktor (@PM_ViktorOrban) October 6, 2023

This UN migration pact would make it illegal for many White people to criticize these fine folks.

A new United Nations migration pact has been proposed for the explicit purpose of flooding Europe with millions of low IQ savages from the third world. It’s estimated that the plan would result in Europe being overwhelmed with 60 million of these creatures over the next six years.

As bad as this is, the migration pact would also criminalize criticism of this invasion under “hate speech” laws.

Daily Express:

The United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration seeks to make immigration a universal human right. MEP Marcel de Graaff said: “I would like to say some words on the global compact on migration. On the 10th and 11th of December there will be an international congress in Marrakesh Morocco. The participating countries are set to sign this agreement and although this joint agreement is not binding it is still meant to be the legal framework on which the participating countries commit themselves to build new legislation.

“One basic element of this new agreement is the extension of the definition of hate speech.

“The agreement wants to criminalise migration speech. Criticism of migration will become a criminal offence.

“Media outlets that give room to criticism of migration can be shut down.

“The compact for migration is legalisation of mass migration.

“It is declaring migration as a human right so it will, in effect, become impossible to criticise Mrs Merkel’s welcome migrants politics without being at risk of being jailed for hate speech.”

Many European countries already have restrictive laws against so-called “hate speech.” It is literally illegal for people to criticize Jews, different racial groups or deny the Holocaust in many of these places. So based on this, it is not surprising that there would be an attempt to more broadly define the definition of “hate speech.”

That’s because it is the stated goal of Jews to flood Europe with large groups of brown and black populations in order to transform the continent into a multicultural hellhole.

This was famously admitted by the Jewess Barbara Lerner Spectre.

Since it is the stated goal of the Jews to flood the continent with millions upon millions of non-Whites, it only makes sense that they would want to make it illegal for anyone to criticize their diabolical plot.

The good news is that many Eastern European countries, Italy, Switzerland and Austria have already said that they’re not going to sign on to this ridiculous migration pact. But every White nation in the world should be rejecting it. Our countries have enough problems as is and the last thing we need is another massive flood of third world apes.

British MEP Janice Atkinson is claiming that the UN Compact on Migration would result in Europe being swamped with 59 million new migrants in the next 6 years.

Sixty-million brown people in Europe would pretty much completely destroy the last remnants of Western civilization.

At the same time, it would have virtually no impact whatsoever on global brown poverty.

Surely, the goal isn’t actually to destroy Europe? Surely, someone’s math must just be wrong?

Furthermore, though we’re hearing a lot about the Migrant Pact, the UN’s Refugee Pact – which is a totally separate suicide pact – is allegedly even worse.

Voice of Europe:

In parallel with the highly criticised migration pact, the UN has also prepared a refugee pact. Both these treaties are intended to be signed at the conference in Morocco on 10-11 December.

Even if the pact is not legally binding, it refers to obligations. Thus, a kind of soft laws that restrict the sovereignty of the countries. Some of the points included in the refugee pact are as follows:

-The refugee concept is extended to people affected by climate change and environmental destruction (paragraph 12).

-Every four years starting in 2019, a global refugee forum will check and produce an index for how each country has lived up to the agreement’s obligations (paragraphs 17-19).

-A global academic network with universities, academic associations and research institutes will be established to create opportunities for refugees for education, research and scholarships (paragraph 43).

-Promote a positive attitude towards refugees being transferred from one country to another (paragraph 90).

It is not only the UN that works actively to bring about changes in migration issues, but also the EU and other actors. A relevant element is the EU document which concerns the promotion of relocation of refugees within the Member States.

…

The treaty text of the UN refugee pact can be read in its entirety here.

Also worthy of note as they plan to flood us with these evil monsters: global poverty is actually continuing to drop worldwide, despite the insane birthrates of the monkeymen.

The only place it’s going up is Africa and seriously – what the hell is anyone supposed to do about black people being poor?

If white people are the global daddies of the brown world, then we should be occupying Africa and controlling the birthrate. Taking black people out of Africa does not slow their birthrate.

These people are like goddamn Tribbles.

Point being: bringing tens of millions of brown people to Europe does not improve the global situation. Anyone making that claim is simply trying to emotionally manipulate you.

So what is the thing then?

At some point, instead of talking about all of these side issues, someone needs to just come out and publicly start asking if there is a group of people purposefully trying to exterminate white people.

Because that certainly appears to simply be an obvious fact.

And if that is the case, who is doing it and for what purpose?