It is well understood that the social dynamics of all multiracial and multicultural societies drive ethnic minorities to organise in their own interests, and where societies are transitioning from an originally homogenous state towards multiculturalism, the actions of organised minorities inevitably militate against the interests of the original host community. Furthermore, host communities that do not respond by organising to prevent the undermining of their ethnic interests, and ethnic minorities that do not so organise, lose out in competition for finite resources, becoming impoverished and marginalized by those that do.

In Britain there are now a multitude of organised ethnic minority communities, and it is clear that certain of these have learned the value of collaboration against any attempts by we indigenous British — who are still the ethnic majority – to reassert our primacy of place in this our ethnic homelend.

Evidence of such collaboration can be seen in the assistance given to the Muslim community by organised Jewry.

In the aftermath of the murder of off-duty British soldier Lee Rigby last year, it was feared that there might be a violent backlash against Muslims and there were reports that the Jewish ‘Community Security Trust’ (CST) had become involved in advising Muslim groups regarding the security of their religious and community buildings. I also reported earlier this year that advice had been given to the Muslim community in setting up an organisation equivalent to the CST, that would campaign in the interests of Muslims, including the gathering of ‘evidence’ of so-called ‘hate crimes’ with which to defame we indigenous British. Indeed, I was able to report that this new Muslim organisation, called ‘Tell Mama’, has as its co-chairman, one Richard Benson, a Jew, who until last year had been the chief executive of the CST.

However, one of the features of the creeping multiculturalisation of Britain has been the tendency of ethnic minorities to bring with them old enmities from their ethnic homelands and there have for example been sporadic outbreaks of hostility between Somalian and Ethiopian immigrants, as yet still relatively insignificant ethnic minorities in terms of their level of organisation.

On a more serious level, and one that is far more instructive in terms of our struggle for the freedom and self-determination of the British people, has been the way in which the current hostilities in Gaza have begun to strain relations between the Jewish and Muslim communities, undoing some of the work they have done in recent years in order to advance their mutual ethnic interests through collaboration.

The recent comments of Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, an ethnic Pakistani and a Muslim, accompanying her resignation from the Tory cabinet, have been most instructive for anyone doubting the existence of a powerful ‘Israeli lobby’ or ‘Jewish lobby’ at the heart of government.

In statements to Channel 4 News explaining her resignation, Sayeeda Warsi has criticised David Cameron and George Osborne for failing to raise enough concerns with Israel regarding their bombing of Gaza. Warsi directed her anger at George Osborne in particular after he had stated that her resignation over the government’s position on Gaza was “disappointing and frankly unnecessary”.

When asked about Osborne’s comments, she said: “George is a very good friend of the Israeli government and therefore he, more than anybody else, should have been saying quite frankly to the Israeli government that what you are doing is not in your interest. This is probably the biggest single act of self-harm that the Israeli government has done over the last few years.

“What he should have been saying to the Israeli government is that it is unnecessary for you to kill innocent civilians, to displace a quarter of the Gazan population, for you to flatten schools, hospitals and power supplies and water supplies to achieve your ends. Had George done that, I agree with him that it would not have been necessary for me to resign.”

One of Warsi’s major points of concern has apparently been David Cameron’s refusal to say that Israeli action in Gaza has been “disproportionate”.

She stated: “I think for me it’s morally indefensible where after four weeks of a conflict more than a quarter of the Gazan population displaced, nearly 2,000 people killed, more than 400 innocent children killed, we still cannot find the words to say, we condemn this and we feel this action has been disproportionate. These issues are too serious for us to be mealy-mouthed and for us to be dragging our heels.”

According to the Independent newspaper, Lady Warsi revealed that senior foreign office officials and ministers were overruled by David Cameron who decided that the Government would not take a stronger line on Israel’s incursion into Gaza. She suggested that senior Tory figures may have been overly influenced by pro-Israeli lobbying groups such as Conservative Friends of Israel.

“What does concern me is that when you have senior officials and you have ministers within the Foreign Office saying we are in the wrong place on this policy, yet somehow that view is not being reflected. I certainly don’t think the decisions were being made in the Foreign Office.”

She went on to say: “One of the advantages we have in the Conservative Party is that the relationships between the Israeli government and the leadership of the Conservative Party is incredibly close. People like George Osborne and Michael Gove are very, very close to the Israeli leadership. What is the point of having that relationship if you can’t use it to move them to a position which is in their interest and our interest?”

Warsi said the lobbying operation by Israel was “incredibly effective” and raised questions over the influence of party donors.

“I don’t blame the [pro-Israel] lobby, I blame the politicians. If you are not capable of being able to decipher between lobbying and fact, and if we are incapable of politicians to see both sides of the argument, then that’s a fault that we have.”

She added: “I sincerely hope that how the Tory party raises its funds does not have an impact in relation to its policy in government. The national interest should never be subject to the chequebooks of anybody.”

Clearly, in the mind of Sayeeda Warsi, there is great influence exercised by the ‘Israeli lobby’ over government policy in this country. Clearly also, she believes that influence is most keenly exercised through donations made to the Conservative party by Jewish donors in this country and I imagine that if she were entirely honest, she would admit that there is cause for similar concern regarding the increasingly large donations made to the Conservative Party by wealthy  Muslims.

An accountant at a chain of academies championed by Michael Gove is at the centre of a fraud investigation after £4million of school funds ended up in his personal accounts.

Nigerian-born Samuel Kayode is said to have spent much of the cash on an extravagant lifestyle and buying a string of properties.

The 57-year-old part-time pastor was told by the High Court to pay £4.1million back to the Haberdashers’ Aske’s chain of academies more than a year ago.

He has failed to do so, and it is feared most of the cash has been transferred to Nigeria.

The case, kept secret for almost two years, is believed to be Britain’s biggest ever education fraud.

Although Kayode was arrested in October 2012, police have yet to charge him with any crime.

Critics of academies – state schools which have control of their own finances – say the massive loss of cash calls that entire system into question.

Questions were also asked about whether Mr Gove – who lost his job as Education Secretary last week – took close enough interest in the case.

The vast sum of money is missing from the Haberdashers’ Aske’s Federation Trust in South London.

It is named after 17th century silk merchant Robert Aske who left much of his wealth to create an educational charity fund run by the Worshipful Company of Haberdashers.

The Haberdashers’ Aske’s public schools for boys and girls in Hertfordshire were founded with his money.

Three Haberdashers’ Aske’s state secondaries in South-East London – Hatcham College, Knight’s Academy and Crayford Academy – are run by the trust as a separate charitable wing funded by Mr Aske’s endowment. They were often referred to by Mr Gove in speeches.

Read More

How long do you think a white teacher would last in a British primary school if he were to tell his class of seven-year olds that all non-Christians were “filthy heathens”? Or if he referred to black people using the “n-word”? Or he accused all Muslims of being frustrated terrorists?

Not very long, I expect. The story would be a national scandal, with politicians promising to root out this disgraceful attitude wherever they found it, with earnest, handwringing Guardian editorials about the prevalence of racism in modern Britain, and a soundbite from the Prime Minister himself on Channel 4 News reassuring viewers how personally repellant he found the whole appalling business.

So how come for one particular minority the rules are different? How come, when a Birmingham teacher told his Local Education Authority that he had seen signs of an attempted Islamist takeover in local schools as early as 1993, his warnings were ignored and he ended up being dismissed for “gross misconduct”? How come when a headteacher advised the Department of Education of the Birmingham “Trojan Horse” plot in 2010, he too was ignored? How come, the very second it emerged that in certain Birmingham schools Western women were being described by teachers as “white prostitutes” and Westerners generally as “kuffar” the offending teachers weren’t sacked and the schools investigated with a view to closure?

The injustice and cowardice and dishonesty of the cultural surrender here seems to me so obvious that I’m astonished it needs spelling out. But apparently it does. Here we are, after perhaps two decades’ worth of warnings and rumours that, courtesy of the UK taxpayer, British schoolchildren in parts of the country are being indoctrinated in the virtues of racial and religious hatred and of cultural apartheid. Yet only today have we reached the point where our authorities have come round to acknowledging the problem with the publication of Ofsted’s damning report on the way a number of Birmingham schools have been hijacked by Islamist extremists.

Worse still, even now, there remains bitter division within the government over whether confronting the problem remains the right thing to do. Or whether it might be more culturally sensitive to look the other way, because after all, devout Muslims really are concerned about the decadence of the West, and it’s only proper that they should be permitted by the British state school system to treat their girls as second-class citizens, and teach them anti-Christmas chants, and stop boys from urinating standing up, because then they’ll learn from example what it is to live in tolerant country and we’ll all get along just fine, probably.

Representing the first point of view in the Coalition cabinet is Education Secretary Michael Gove. Representing the latter point of view is Home Secretary Theresa May. This is the division responsible for their public spat over the last few days and I can certainly see why Gove refused to back down until absolutely forced to do so by David Cameron. Some points of principle are so important they deserve to take precedence over Coalition government unity or career safety – and this was most definitely one of them.

Read More

Add another nail to the coffin of our Western Liberal Democracy.

Why is the UK Gov’t appeasing Muslims?

Via the Daily Caller

Beginning in 2014, the United Kingdom will require all British schoolchildren to complete a unit on the history of Islam, proudly reports Press TV, Iran’s very own 24-hour English language news organization.

British Education Secretary Michael Gove announced the addition of a Muslim-specific component after revisions were made to address an outcry over a prior draft that did not include any references to the monotheistic Abrahamic religion.

I wonder how the teachers of the history of Islam unit will explain the following grisly passages from the Koran to the students?

“Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191

“Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood.” Koran 9:123

“When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5

“Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85

“The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”… Koran 9:30

“Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33

“Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19

“The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.” Koran 8:65

“Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.” Koran 3:28

“Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12

“Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.” Koran 8:60

Students will also learn that Slavery is explicitly permitted in the Koran and that you can be put to death for insulting Allah or if you fail to convert to Islam.

Will students next be encouraged to recite the Muslim Brotherhood motto while at school?

God is our goal.

The Prophet is our leader.

The Koran is our constitution.

Jihad is our way.

Death in the service of God is the loftiest of our wishes.

God is great, God is great.

“It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and extend its power to the entire planet.” – Hassan al-Banna – founder of theMuslim Brotherhood.

The Indoctrination begins.