Noticing Jewish dominance over the media is just a canard.

We stupid goyim just can’t compete with that Jewish work ethic and high Ashkenazal IQ.

Breitbart:

Polish efforts to reduce foreign ownership of the country’s media have been dealt a blow, as organisations linked to globalist financier George Soros took control of a major radio group.

Agora SA, Poland’s largest publicly-traded publisher, which was “shored up” financially by the Hungarian-born billionaire in 2016 amidst sinking sales of its globalist flagship daily, Gazeta Wyborcza, on Wednesday announced it had agreed to buy a 40 per cent share in Eurozet, a media company which owns several radio stations.

The remaining 60 per cent stake in the group, whose assets include the country’s second largest station, Radio ZET, will be held by SFS Ventures, part of Soros’ Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF).

Things like cycling, medieval studies and baseball can be “unbearably White,” but your media can never be too Jewish.

With Agora’s presence on the news and entertainment landscape in Poland already huge, as the owner of dozens of properties and titles including Metro — the third most read daily and the country’s only free nationwide newspaper — the government sounded the alarm over media plurality when Soros’ interest in buying the Eurozet was flagged last month.

“The Polish state has to do everything it can to prevent market speculators from increasing their influence on the media market,” said Beata Mazurek, spokesman for Poland’s patriotic ruling party, Law & Justice (PiS), tweeting in January.

Isn’t “market speculators” an anti-Semitic dog whistle?

Because I’m quite certain that saying Jews are influential in the financial industry is an anti-Semitic canard and perhaps even an anti-Semitic trope.

After looking into its options, however, Deputy Culture Minister Pawel Lewandowski lamented that the government lacked tools for analysing “concentration on the media market with multiple platforms [or which could] measure concentration on the market of ideas”, with regards to the cross-market holdings of groups.

Since its election to power in 2015, PiS has advocated the country’s news companies should be in Polish hands, with Senate Speaker Stanislaw Karczewski remarking in November that foreign ownership “isn’t healthy”.

“I’m in favor of re-Polonization of the media, banks and other institutions, which should be majority-owned by Poles,” he told Rzeczpospolita daily, adding: “In the U.S., there’s no French or German television providing news on U.S. matters.”

Then do it… Just put a law that bans foreign ownership of the media.

You’re in power, you have a majority of the parliament and popular support for measures like this, so what’s stopping you?

Jewish media control in Europe is something you hear less about than the control over the media they have in America because it’s more subtle.

While there are large Jewish media trusts, like the Bonnier Group, which covers most of northern Europe, or CME, which was founded by the Jew Lauder and then passed on to the Jews from Warner and which controls multiple large media outlets in south-central and south-eastern Europe, most of the Jewish media control in Europe is done by governments, through heavy regulation and subsidies.

Jews are, of course, vastly overrepresented as “journalists,” especially in Britain, but overall there’s not enough of them on the continent to have the same kind of grip they do in the US because most of them were turned into lampshades and soap emigrated to Israel or America after WWII.

No country in Europe has any freedom of speech, so the government can basically just put you in prison for anything their kosher overlords say is “hatred” or “fascism” or whatever.

The US, on the other hand, has that pesky 1st Amendment thing that was put there by the White supremacists who founded America so they can oppress blacks, Indians, Irish and other non-Whites by hurting their feelings, so the kikes have to take a more hands-on approach there.

Amos Guiora

A few people resent it when I compare the current state of our people to Palestinians, but it is important because Jews would be doing to us what they do to Gazans if it weren’t for the fact that there’s still a lot of us.

How Jews perceive non-Jews is seen in their reaction to Gentile grievances. The chicken or the egg is an age-old paradox, and yet, our elites never posit a similar dynamic when it comes to the Jew or the anti-Semite. Jews are the only people on earth who are perpetually targeted, but that is because they have for just as long asserted that they’ve never done anything wrong in all of history and that the real problem is that Gentiles have the right to speak freely.

The latest case of Hebrew hubris comes in the form of a hardline murdering Jew, ex-IDF counsel Amos Guiora, who spends most of his time making up legal defenses for the indiscriminate murder of Palestinian political opposition, and now sits in a Utah law school trying to figure out a way to overturn Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), which is seen by legal scholars as a pivotal moment in the history of the Supreme Court’s duty to uphold the First Amendment.

Wikipedia:

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action”. Specifically, it struck down Ohio’s criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence.

A lot of Jewish discussion about suppressing free speech after their media machine failed to prevent Trump has tried to avoid talks of using state-mandated punitive measures to censor ideas and news they don’t want the public to access, instead lobbying private corporations to shut down “fake news.”

For now, the Jewish domination (Google, Facebook, soon Twitter, etc) of social media/G2G media (Goy-To-Goy) has allowed them to maintain a fragile grip on public access to information and free-flowing discourse. The massive scope and infinite possibilities of the internet is something Jews have utilized to try and stir the pot in countries like Iran, but eventually, passive means of censoring those of us who oppose the globalist order will not be enough to stem the leaps we are making in awakening and organizing our folk against all the odds.

In countries like France, strong labor unions and laws often prevent employers from arbitrarily firing someone because they have a different political opinion when they’re off the clock, so France has hate speech laws where people like Dieudonne are fined and go to prison for satirizing the “Holocaust” industry. Compare this to Emily Youcis, who was recently fired from her job selling peanuts for attending a paleo-conservative conference in Washington, DC.

By calling and harassing the workplaces of people who disagree with Jews, Jewish pressure groups like the SPLC are capable of preventing dissidents from access to food and shelter, which, in practical terms, isn’t much better than being fined and thrown in jail but keeping your job.

This has worked to keep the goyim silent for a long time.

However, for us Millennials, the jobs available are so bad and pay so poorly that losing them for speaking out doesn’t make that big of a difference in the end, hence the Jews are working on the development of new strategies to ‘shut it down.’

Enter the Jew Amos, who is getting op-ed space in a mainstream newspaper to argue for the dismantling of one of America’s most sacred national values.

Salt Lake Tribune:

The 1969 [Brandenburg v. Ohio] ruling came well before the digital age. We live in a time where clicks and shares spread hate and false information instantaneously across the internet.

Given the tone and tenor in society following the election of Donald Trump, I believe it is time to revisit limits on free speech.

The challenge is to determine what degree of extremist internet speech can be tolerated — in the context of freedom of speech — before determining that extremist speech poses a clear and present danger. Balancing is essential; the consequences of unjustified limitations of free speech are antithetical to a democracy. On the other hand, speech has the potential of harming. The adage “words kill” is neither amorphous nor abstract.

Speech must be handled with sensitivity, intelligence and honesty. When reasonable to assume speech will cause harm to others, we should prevent it. If unclear whether speech will result in harm, it must be protected; otherwise over-reach is the inevitable and problematic result.

Brandenburg must be understood to not only protect the speaker’s rights, but to also ensure protection of potential targets. As has been made dramatically clear in the past weeks, there is potential danger to minority groups. They are deserving of our protection. We are living in a time when reports of hate are surfacing at an alarming rate.

This is not the type of society we should be comfortable accepting. We need a national conversation that asks: “What are the limits of tolerating hate?”

We may find in these discussions that we have already well surpassed our acceptable threshold for these limits.

Seeing as Jews believe the phrase “law and order” is racist and causes harm to others, it’s safe to assume that the only people who will ever be allowed to publicly comment on politics in Amos’ ideal dystopia will be Lena Dunham and Lady Gaga.

You see, this is the real, raw, barenaked Jew: an intolerant demagogue who accuses you of the very thing he is doing when you tell him to stop. All Jews believe “words kill,” whether it’s an exhibit criticizing Israel or a pamphlet pointing to the mathematical impossibility of 6,000,000 being gassed and cremated in WW2 labor camps. Seeing as they know “words kill,” keep it in mind when Amos’ co-conspirators like Tim Wise and Noel Ignatiev make brazen calls for blacks to begin murdering whites in the street that echo throughout the Judenpresse and are then explained away as “metaphorical.”

As the spirit-sponging, civilization burdening vermin continue to witness their monopoly over public opinion slip, they will continue to show their true face to the world. Keep pushing until they’re fully out from behind the curtain.

It should be noted that Amos Guiora was an “expert witness” in the Geert Wilders free speech trial in Holland. Maybe Geert should learn to get his lips off Hymie’s behind and stop shilling for Zionism, because it sure isn’t helping him any.

Feel free to drop Amos a line on Twitter and let him know what you think of his agenda to silence the goyim.

See my op-ed in @sltrib titled "In this age of internet hate, it's time to revisit limits on free speech" https://t.co/PpZZQmGwyq

— Amos Guiora (@amos_guiora) December 5, 2016

The evidence is in: Google is operated by Nazis.

There’s a grand conspiracy, by large internet corporations like Google, Facebook and Twitter, to push nationalist ideas and anti-migrant attitudes.

What they do is that they’ll influence search results and story suggestions to shape the common people’s perceptions towards Nazism.

This has been ongoing for a long time, unreported, unchallenged.

Until one woman finally had the courage to stand up and say, “enough is enough!”

The Guardian:

Angela Merkel has called on major internet platforms to divulge the secrets of their algorithms, arguing that their lack of transparency endangers debating culture.

The German chancellor said internet users had a right to know how and on what basis the information they received via search engines was channelled [sic] to them.

Speaking to a media conference in Munich, Merkel said: “I’m of the opinion that algorithms must be made more transparent, so that one can inform oneself as an interested citizen about questions like ‘what influences my behaviour on the internet and that of others?’.

“Ja, ja. Facebook. Shut it down.”

This dog of a woman is actually worried that facebook isn’t sufficiently biased in favor of her invasion agenda.

Let that sink in for a moment.

“Algorithms, when they are not transparent, can lead to a distortion of our perception, they can shrink our expanse of information.”

An algorithm is the formula used by a search engine to steer a request for information. They are different for every search engine, highly secret and determine the significance or ranking of a web page.

Merkel has joined a growing number of critics who have highlighted the dangers of receiving information that confirms an existing opinion or is recommended by people with similar ideas.

“This is a development that we need to pay careful attention to,” she told the conference, adding that a healthy democracy was dependent on people being confronted by opposing ideas.

Nothing makes sense anymore…

I guess she means that the “conventional” ideas are racist and bigoted, and that people have to be exposed to new and fresh ideas… like multiculturalism, tolerance and anti-racism?

I mean, I’m having a hard time following her here.

“The big internet platforms, through their algorithms, have become an eye of a needle which diverse media must pass through [to access their users],” she said.

There has been increasing concern about so-called filter bubbles and echo chambers – the result of an internet search in which an algorithm supposes the information someone would like to see based on previous searches, as well as information it might have about their location or preferences – in the light of the growing strength of populist movements in Europe, the Brexit vote in the UK and the rise of Donald Trump in the US. This month, President Barack Obama’s former social media adviser Caleb Gardner highlighted the danger of filter bubbles – a phrase invented by the internet activist Eli Pariser.

“More likely than not, you get your news from Facebook,” Gardner told students at Northwestern University in Illinois. “Forty-four per cent of US adults get news on the site, and 61% of millennials … if that doesn’t frighten you, you don’t know enough about Facebook’s algorithm. If you have a parent who’s a Trump supporter, they are seeing a completely different set of news items than you are.”

We need to go back to the good old days of centralized TV news, when things were really objective.

Germany is a occupied state with 1984-style thought-crime laws.

But that’s not enough for Mama Merkel.

Internet companies are solidly in the hands of Jews and managed by rabid SJW’s. They actively conspire to twist news suggestions to push this liberal agenda and suppress nationalist stories.

But that’s not enough for Mama Merkel.

I guess she wants total, top-down state control of every trending story on all social media, as well as the power to customize the news feed of all German citizens to prevent them from having wrong thoughts.

Throw the Jew down the well, so my media can be free!

It has to be said that any media Jew is a de facto spy for world Jewry. Thus keeping them out of your country is always justified, as they are sure to be a national security threat.

That said, most countries just grin and bear it, fearful of the bad publicity they’d be sure to get out of any kind of resistance.

Seems that Russia isn’t “most countries.”

The New York Times:

An executive with NBCUniversal said he had been denied entry into Russia and detained for several hours on Wednesday, raising the prospect that a growing spy and diplomatic confrontation could now be tipping into the world of business.

(((Business)))

The executive, Jeff Shell, who oversees the motion picture unit, said he was traveling to Russia on business when he was detained briefly and ordered to leave the country. Mr. Shell said NBCUniversal had a movie operation in the country. He is also the chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the federal agency that oversees Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and other government broadcasters that are not well liked in the Kremlin.

Huh, I wonder why the Kremlin would feel that way about the Western media?

Mr. Shell said he had arrived in Moscow around 11:30 p.m. and was making his way through immigration when he was pulled out of the line.

“I was then taken to a small room and left alone for about a half-hour before someone came back with a document in Russian that they wanted me to sign,” he said in a telephone interview.

Mr. Shell said he refused, telling the Russian authorities that he would not sign something he did not understand. He said he was then given a translation of the document, which explained that he had been barred from the country. He said he was then escorted to another room at the airport and that he was locked inside for nearly three hours, until a flight to Amsterdam was arranged.

“An armed guard came and got me at about 5 a.m. and walked me onto the plane and to my seat,” Mr. Shell said. “He gave my passport to the pilot and said not to give it back to me until I was on Dutch soil. It was quite embarrassing.”

Oh, you found that embarrassing, Jew? We have other ways of getting you out if you prefer.

Overall, this is definitely indicative of rising tensions. As the West is putting military bases closer and closer to Russia’s borders, doing threatening military exercises and ramping up their rhetoric, it’s normal that the Kremlin is bracing itself for confrontation.

This Jew looks totally trustworthy, bro. Let him see all your secrets.

Conan O’Brien demonstrates, without much commentary, that the local news all across America is centrally scripted.

It is not just the big national news that is planned by Jews, it is every single media outlet.

The internet is the only place it is even possible to get real news, and the Jews know it, so they have proceeded to flood the place with nonsense, so as it is so confusing no one can find the real truth. Hence, Alex Jones and the rest of the endless, rattling noise.

What we are doing here at the Daily Stormer is cutting through the nonsense, and mainstreaming a clear and concise message about the nature of reality and the situation we are dealing with.