It’s established law in these United States: you do not have to bake a poop cake.

It is a fundamental human right to eat poop, but a baker doesn’t have to assist you.

These are our top freedoms.

Reuters:

Colorado’s top court on Tuesday ducked the question of whether a Christian baker had the right to refuse to create a cake for a customer celebrating a gender transition by dismissing the discrimination case on procedural grounds.

Lower courts in Colorado had concluded that Masterpiece Cakeshop and the bakery’s owner, Jack Phillips, had violated Autumn Scardina’s rights by refusing to make her a pink cake with blue frosting because of her identity as a transgender woman.

“Autumn Scardina”

Phillips, whose prior refusal to make a wedding cake for a gay couple was at the center of a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court, had on appeal urged the Colorado Supreme Court to conclude that requiring him to make the cake would infringe his free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

Faggots are completely obsessed with this guy.

He beat them at SCOTUS, so apparently there are just faggots lined up outside his shop every day demanding poop cake.

But the state high court on a 4-3 vote avoided that issue entirely by instead concluding that under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, Scardina, a lawyer, was not permitted to sue the baker in 2019 following an earlier administrative process.

Scardina had initially filed a discrimination complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division after Phillips refused to make the cake she wanted to order to celebrate her birthday and her identity as a transgender woman. She said he refused her order because of her identity.

The commission reached a confidential settlement with Phillips, without Scardina’s participation. Justice Melissa Hart, writing for the majority, said Scardina should have challenged that decision in an appeals court, rather than file a new lawsuit.

Justice Richard Gabriel, in a dissenting opinion joined by two other justices, called the majority’s ruling “troubling” for how it “throws Scardina completely out of court.”

“I am concerned that Masterpiece and Phillips will construe today’s ruling as a vindication of their refusal to sell non-expressive products with no intrinsic meaning to customers who are members of a protected class (here, the LGBTQ+ community),” he wrote.

Why are homosexuals a “protected class”?

What does it mean that in America we supposedly have “equality” but also have “protected classes”?

How can both things be true?

How can you force a man to bake a cake?

In actual fact, based on the existing law in this stupid faggot country, the baker is legally required to make a poop cake. It’s in the Civil Rights Act that normal people do not have rights to freedom of association, and “protected classes” are allowed to order them to do things. This “protected class” vs. normal people Master-Slave dynamic is supposed to be counterbalanced by “religious freedom,” but you are expressly not allowed to say it is against your religion to bake a cake for niggers, so there is no reason you would be allowed to refuse to bake a poop cake.

America law is totally Jewish and does not make any sense. It is not based on a system.

That’s why the court didn’t want to make a real ruling and simply dismissed the case.

Guy’s been in and out of court for the past 12 years or so

This poor bastard’s living in a Jewdicial Groundhog day.

AP News:

A Christian baker found to have violated Colorado’s anti-discrimination law by refusing to make a birthday cake for a transgender woman has appealed the ruling to the state appeal appeals court.

In a notice filed Monday, lawyers for Jack Phillips asked the appeals court to review the June ruling by a Denver judge by looking at both procedural issues and whether the ruling violated Phillips’ constitutional rights to freedom of speech and religion.

Autumn Scardina, a man pretending to be a woman who’s somehow allowed to practice law

Judge A. Bruce Jones ruled that attorney Autumn Scardina was denied a cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside to celebrate her gender transition on her birthday because of her transgender status in violation of the law. While Phillips said he could not make the cake because of its message, Jones said the case was about a refusal to sell a product, not compelled speech.

Phillips won a partial victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 for refusing to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple when the court found the state civil rights commission showed anti-religious bias when it sanctioned Phillips.

What Christians don’t understand is that a private company doesn’t have a right to deny privileges to People of Anus.

The only thing a private company is allowed to do is run a mass censorship campaign for the explicit purpose of trying to change the outcome of elections, or to force vaccinate people.

But there are limits, and those limits end at denying the right of a cake to a man who masturbates into other men’s buttholes.

From the same state, just a few days ago

The People of Sodom are doing this on purpose, obviously. These homosexuals want to spread the gay and punish anyone who opposes it.

AP:

A Colorado baker who won a partial victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 for refusing to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple went on trial Monday in yet another lawsuit, this one involving a birthday cake for a transgender woman.

Autumn Scardina attempted to order the birthday cake on the same day in 2017 that the high court announced it would hear baker Jack Phillips’ appeal in the wedding cake case. Scardina, an attorney, requested a cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside in honor of her gender transition.

Her lawsuit is the latest in a series of cases around the U.S. that pit the rights of LGBTQ people against merchants’ religious objections, an issue that remains unsettled by the nation’s top court.

“Autumn Scardina”

On Monday, during a virtual trial being conducted by a state judge in Denver, Scardina said Phillips had maintained that, as a Christian, he opposed making the gay couple’s wedding cake because it involved a religious ceremony but would sell any other type of product.

She said she called Phillips’ Masterpiece Cakeshop to place the order after hearing about the court’s announcement because she wanted to find out if he really meant it.

When her lawyer Paula Greisen asked whether the call was a “setup,” she said it was not.

“It was more of calling someone’s bluff,” she said.

In opening arguments, a lawyer representing Phillips, Sean Gates, said his refusal to make Scardina’s cake was about its message, not discriminating against Scardina, echoing assertions made in Phillips’ legal battle over his refusal to make a wedding cake for Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins in 2012. With Phillips getting media attention since then, he could not create a cake with a message he disagreed with, Gates said.

“The message would be that he agrees that a gender transition is something to be celebrated,” said Gates, who noted later that Phillips had objected to making cakes with other messages he opposed, including Halloween items.

He cannot be allowed to disagree with other people’s right to mutilate their own genitals and obtain sexual pleasure from the act of playing around with poop in the rectum.

If we allow people to disagree, People of Sodom will die.

One would have assumed that after Jack Phillips refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding and the Supreme Court ruled in his favor, the faggot community would stop trying to buy cakes to support the business of such a bigot.

But one would underestimate the psychosis of transgenders.

Daily Mail:

A Christian baker in Colorado is being sued for the third time after allegedly refusing to make a cake to celebrate a gender transition.

Jack Phillips, who owns the Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, has previously made national headlines for refusing to bake cakes that are against his Christian faith.

He is now the subject of his third lawsuit after transgender woman Autumn Scardina filed a court documents last week accusing him of refusing to make her gender transition cake.

It comes after the Supreme Court ruled in the baker’s favor last year after he was sued for refusing to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

“Autumn Scardina” was born with a penis.

Scardina, the transgender woman who filed the recent lawsuit against the baker, placed the order for a cake celebrating her gender transition on the day the Supreme Court handed down its decision.

She filed a lawsuit after that order was declined but the suit was dismissed.

The lawsuit she filed last week is her second attempt at suing Phillips for what she says is discrimination and unfair trade practices.

‘Masterpiece Cakeshop said before the Supreme Court they would serve any baked good to members of the LGBTQ community. It was just the religious significance of it being a wedding cake,’ her attorney Paula Griesen said.

‘We don’t believe they’ve been honest with the public.’

The lawsuit filed by Scardina claims that Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop had confirmed they would happily make the exact same cake requested by her for other customers.

It’s a tricky situation.

If the baker really did say that he’d serve baked good to LGBTQ degenerates then he was pretty much asking for some random tranny to put its insanity on display in front of him.

It would be better if people could just straight-out say that interacting with LGBTQ “people” (beyond the practice of throwing them off of rooftops) goes against their religion or whatever.

Works for MOSLEMS, apparently.

Trannies are not harassing their cake shops.