Everything is rape these days.

What did Puff Daddy actually even do? People keep saying “it’s like Epstein,” but it looks a lot more like Weinstein to me.

Daily Mail:

Teachers are telling schoolboys that displaying traditional gendered roles in a family could lead to them committing rape, a bombshell report has claimed.

The report from the Family Education Trust (FET) found that almost a third of schools that it surveyed use relationship and sex education classes to teach pupils about ‘toxic masculinity’.

In one schools’ teaching materials on the subject, children are told that while masculinity ‘in and itself is not necessarily a harmful thing’ certain masculine traits can be be seen as ‘problematic’.

Another presents a ‘pyramid of sexual violence‘, which suggests that certain minor behaviours such as ‘displaying traditional gendered roles’ may develop into other examples of ‘gender-based violence’ such as flashing, groping and even rape.

The FET said that such lessons are teaching pupils about a ‘problematic new ideology’ that presents the idea that ‘boys and men possess traits that are inherently negative for society’.

The report, titled ‘Boys and the Burden of Labels: An examination of masculinity teaching in schools’, surveyed 303 secondary schools and academies across the country, asking whether they taught the concept of ‘toxic masculinity’ in lessons on relationships and sex education.

It found that of the 197 schools that responded, 62 confirmed they were teaching lessons on ‘toxic masculinity’.

A total of 10 schools also admitted that they were teaching that ‘men and boys possess traits that are inherently toxic and negative for society’.

The FET were also shown a range of teaching materials that the surveyed schools used for lessons about ‘toxic masculinity’.

The report stated that these resources often portrayed masculinity ‘exclusively through a feminist lens’ and ‘on occasion this was overtly political’.

One slide from a lesson on ‘toxic masculinity’ states that while ‘masculinity in and itself is not necessarily a harmful thing…the way that masculinity is traditionally defined in society can be problematic’.

It adds that certain masculine traits ‘can be limiting for women, girls and other people who don’t identify as men who are not expected to display these traits’.

Another slide also informs pupils of the difference between ‘toxic masculinity’ and misogyny. It states that ‘ordering a man a beer without first asking what he wants’ as an example of ‘toxic masculinity’, while ‘trying to control what your girlfriend wears’ is seen as misogynistic.

The reports adds: ‘There was a strong emphasis that traits such as strength when inhabited by men could very quickly lead to misogyny.

‘Anyone can display toxic behaviour, but schools are confusing behaviour taken to extremes as the standard archetype of masculinity.’

I did a pyramid of sexual violence once.

I don’t regret it, but I wouldn’t do it again.

We have to turn everyone into a faggot to stop car crashes.

Sound familiar?

It’s a template:

Bad thing -> solution (Jewish agenda) -> utopia

So far, it’s never worked.

We do not yet have a utopia.

But you have to become a faggot, because we at least need to try one more time to build a utopia.

Because why would anyone want to live, except in a utopia?

The Guardian:

A road safety awareness campaign in France is tackling the role of gendered behaviour behind the wheel, warning for the first time that toxic masculinity could be as important a contributing factor to road deaths as speed, alcohol, drugs and fatigue.

The campaign’s video – released for the web, TV cinemas on Wednesday – shows men at the births of their sons and seeks to portray them as thoughtful and sensitive in contrast with the revved-up virility of macho stereotypes.

“Speed, alcohol, drugs, fatigue … what if we need to add masculinity?” asked the French road safety body of the list of factors that typically lead to road accidents.

In France, 78% of those killed in road accidents in 2022 were men – close to the average across the EU. Of French drivers aged 18 – to 24 killed on the road last year, 88% were men. Of people suspected to have caused road accidents, 84% were men, while men accounted for 93% of drunk drivers involved in an accident.

Men drive more, and are vastly overrepresented in jobs that require driving, including driving buses, taxis and trucks.

Was that taken into account?

Probably not.

Florence Guillaume, the interministerial delegate for road safety in France, said the campaign was absolutely not about stigmatising or blaming men in general. “It is about prompting people to examine their behaviour,” she said.

Guillaume said the number of men dying on the roads was a serious issue and “does not mean all men are bad drivers – that is not true”. Instead, she said society should look deeper at behaviours such as risk-taking or the pressures on some men to show they could drive faster or seek to dominate the road.

The message of the video campaign is about urging men to resist social pressure. “You don’t have to follow what people expect of a man,” the voice of a new father tells his son in the clip.

The sociologist Alain Mergier carried out a study on masculinity and driving across all age groups for the campaign. He said: “It’s striking how certain stereotypes are persistently passed from father to son, including the car as a symbolic object of masculinity, male identity and virility. This isn’t given much thought and yet we can see the far-reaching impact on accidents.”

Why do the people lecturing us on masculinity always have so little of it themselves?

He said some boys and men were taught from childhood that the car was their symbol and it was through driving that they could “defend their manliness”.

…

“It could lead to the sense that a man has to prove himself by mastering a vehicle, such as accelerating or breaking speed limits to show ‘I’m a real man’,” Mergier added.

He said the instinct for some male drivers to compete after being overtaken by another car comes from a sense among some “that masculinity has to be defended, lest it be seen as fragile or vulnerable”.

“What’s important about this campaign is that it doesn’t stigmatise men, it suggests another vision of men and masculinity, which is not about confrontation, or being aggressive, but about sensitivity,” he said.

In other words it’s about “being a faggot.”

There is no reality in which “sensitivity” and “man” are the same thing. I can promise you that. If you are sensitive, you are not a man, in fact. You are instead a faggot pussy.

This is the whole 2 hours of the “unveiling”

This makes a lot of sense to me.

Faggots seem very healthy and normal.

If we turned all of our sons into faggots, this would be very good for society.

The Guardian:

Boys should be encouraged to ignore gender stereotypes and share their emotions, according to the team behind a new UK initiative aimed at encouraging them to talk about their feelings and speak out against inequality.

The Global Boyhood Initiative, co-founded by the US-based gender equality organisation Equimundo and the French violence against women charity the Kering Foundation, aims to equip adults with the tools to raise boys to become men who embrace a healthy masculinity.

A report – The State of UK Boys – has been published to mark the launch of the US initiative in the UK, pulling together findings from a range of academic research over the past 20 years – with insights from 15 researchers in the field of gender, masculinities and boyhood.

The Guardian doesn’t link the study they’re writing about because everybody is lazy these days, but I will – here.

There’s also an older one for America – here.

If you want to read any of the other crap these mostly women, Jews and faggots write – go here.

One of the report authors and fellow of Equimundo, David Bartlett, said: “How boys and men behave makes an enormous difference to the lives of girls and women, and individuals of all gender identities, in all areas of their lives.

“From sexual harassment and gender-based violence, to the gender pay gap and relationship breakdown, the attitudes and behaviour of boys and men are hugely influential.

“So, we need to raise a generation of boys who are able to build and sustain healthy, respectful, caring relationships with people of all genders, and not be influenced by restrictive gender stereotypes.”

1/19
’K*ll all men’ trending & regularly being posted; celebrities, media & MPs regularly making misandrists comments; boys being forced to apologise for crimes by their gender, & men being treated as inherent abusers – & there’s no war on men? YEAH RIGHT!https://t.co/PT0NIIBLXt

— Phil Mitchell: Male Sexual Abuse Specialist (@PhilMitchell83) November 8, 2022

The 35-page report claims that, as ideas of gender and boyhood are changing to be more fluid, traditional notions of masculinity such as physical, sexual and intellectual prowess – as well as heterosexuality – still dominate.

…

But it flagged organised sport and physical education as areas with an urgent need to tackle gender and equality issues, with popularity often the reward for those “good” at sports and exclusion and humiliation as “girly” for those who do not measure up to masculine athletic ideals.

Céline Bonnaire, executive director of the Kering Foundation, said: “In order to effectively combat violence against women and girls, it is essential to address the origins of this violence.

“The Kering Foundation is proud to be a co-founder of the Global Boyhood Initiative. Its launch in the UK, with its evidence-based pilot curriculum for seven– to 11-year-old students, is an opportunity to work directly with younger generations, who can shape a more gender equitable future.”

I’ve warned all of you about this “feelings” gibberish.

DO NOT embrace your feelings.

DO NOT share your feelings.

DO suppress your emotions completely.

If you become way too emotional and you need to talk, to to a brother or other close male friend. Do not cry. Just say what you need to say. This should be a rare occurrence – your dad or mom dies, some slut aborts your child, you get a divorce, you get crippled in a car accident, you narrowly escape a murder. You need an extreme trauma to justify sharing your feelings EVER with ANYONE, and you should only do it with a MAN in a very, VERY private setting.

The reason these people tell you to share your feelings is that they want you weak.

I agree that classic film images of masculinity are exaggerated. You’re not ever going be John Wayne or Clint Eastwood. But they are an exaggeration of what you should be aiming for. You should watch John Wayne movies, and if you get confused about what you should do, say to yourself: “what would John Wayne do?”

Seriously: this will help you.

It helps me. I have to deal with extreme shit sometimes.

Of all journalists killed in 2021, 11% were women. In 2020, this was 6%. (Source: @UNESCO)

On the International Day to #EndImpunity for Crimes against Journalists, let us say out loud:

𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏
𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆
𝐖𝐎𝐌𝐄𝐍
𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐒#ProtectJournalists pic.twitter.com/FTeCmSYgIJ

— UN Women (@UN_Women) November 2, 2022

Tom Hanks is the ultimate boomer faggot.

Couldn’t even raise his son with self-confidence, so his son became a tattoo wigger who dates blacks.

New York Post:

Tom Hanks’ son Chet Hanks claimed Tuesday that despite growing up with an Oscar-winning dad, he had no one to turn to as a celebrity kid.

“I didn’t have a strong male role model to tell me … ‘Bro, f–k these people. They are just jealous of you,’” Chet, 31, said in a video on his YouTube channel of the disrespect he endured from his peers for his wealth, fame and being perceived as “arrogant, entitled and spoiled.”

“‘You have all these things that they want, so they are trying to f–king throw their shade at you so you can feel s–tty about yourself because they are jealous.’ I needed to hear that,” he continued. “I didn’t have anyone to tell me that. This is me now telling the younger version of myself what I needed to hear then.”

The “White Boy Summer” rapper said people used to “make up their minds” about him before even getting to know him.

“It was extremely hard to break down their walls,” he shared. “So, I encountered a lot of disdain, a lot of animosity and negativity because everybody was just prepared to hate my guts.”

I’m sure it didn’t help that his father is also an (alleged) illuminati child trafficker with tunnels under his house.

But this is low self-esteem:

It’s pseduo-masculinity designed to mask insecurity.

I mean, I’m all for going to the gym. I’m not for tattoos. And I’m not for constantly posting “look I’m so strong” pictures. Those latter two scream “insecurity.”

So does dating black women, frankly.

Well frankly, dating any women screams low self-esteem.

Anyone who is a “boyfriend” has mommy issues.

Women are for breeding – not for being your friend.

If you need female friends – i.e., girlfriends – you are seeking the approval of women to verify your self-worth.

You don’t need that.

Your self-esteem has to come from inside yourself, from your work, from your accomplishments. A woman cannot give you self-esteem. So can only suck energy from your soul in exchange for bouts of approval which you, as a broken man, view as recognition of your self-worth.

Don’t ever be a boyfriend.

Don’t get tattoos.

If you had a weak father or a single mother, you need to recognize that you don’t need women, and that you need to make yourself into the man you want to be through hard work. There aren’t any shortcuts.

We should always remember John Wayne, as we realize that what we need in this country right now is a man who is a combination of John Wayne and Adolf Hitler.

John Wayne was quintessentially American, and I think that people would do well to look at him when considering what exactly it means to be an American.

I have told you if you are a faggot millennial or younger, raised by women, the best thing you can do is watch John Wayne movies, and just act like he acts. That is really and truly the single best thing you can do.

Do not be an emotional whiny faggot.

Stay calm.

Stay calm.

Stay calm.

The Bun (You can skip this and get to be beef below – this bun section just rambling garbage)

I always have these different article concepts floating around in my head, and so many of them I never end up getting to. Or haven’t yet. Instead, I end up writing endless replies to stupid coronavirus horseshit.

Part of that is that a strength of the site is that it covers all the current events, and right now, coronavirus is always the current event. But part of it is also that I do not take breaks or vacations, and throwing up some obvious virus hoax material is easier than breaking down complicated ideas.

Also, with the virus hoax stuff – see if you can follow me on this, and see what you think of it – I feel like everyone is being bombarded with this so constantly throughout basically every waking moment of their lives* that it is very helpful for people to be able to come here every day and be reminded that they are sane, and is the world that has gone insane. The virus lunacy is so completely out of control, and these people are so intent on making you feel like you’re the one that’s gone crazy, that on a basic psychological level, people need consistent reinforcement of the reality situation.

Therefore, I feel like nonstop virus hoax material is a kind of zen activity, ensuring that people have daily reminders that this is all stupid and fake as a way to center their consciousness.

And it’s not all just total garbage. I think this one today was pretty good, both from an artistic standpoint, and as really just pointing out how goofy it’s all gotten.

Anyway, for the sake of my own zen, I end up posting a lot on The Gamer Uprising. Posting there also helps me to bounce ideas around, and I learn things from other posters there. Regrettably, new registration isn’t open and actually cannot be open, because after 1/6, the FBI has totally unlimited resources for “hunting domestic terrorists,” and they will just show up with six million accounts telling people to commit terrorism.

(Note: They then use their own posts to justify their hunt for terrorists. This is well-established. They figured out a perfect system for planning their own terrorism and then catching themselves doing it with the Moslems, and all those techniques are now being used against white Americans. Posting fake terrorist threats and just encouraging random people to do terrorism on internet websites is a very low effort, high yield activity. You’ll remember that with Robert Bowers who shot up the synagogue in Philadelphia they came out and said that he was in a Gab chatroom with a group of people cheering him on and telling him to do a shooting, even directing him which synagogue to hit, but no one was ever prosecuted for that. Finding a moron they can convince to do a shooting or whatever is a big win for the FBI, and the cost of hiring a people to fill these spaces with this kind of talk is cheap. On the internet, they also really can’t get caught like they did with that Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping hoax they staged. Of course, there were no consequences for getting caught doing that, other than Tucker Carlson segments about it, but it’s better not to get caught and it’s also much more expensive to pay people to actually go and physically get involved in a fake terror plot. The recent guy who claimed to have a bomb in his truck at the capital was clearly a victim of some kind of FBI manipulation – the media immediately buried the story because it was so obvious. He was talking about how he was working with four other people in his bombing plan, so obviously those were FBI agents and he was just a goofy moron. The interesting part is that the FBI could have done that completely over the internet – they could have made him believe he was part of an elite team of patriots who would restore freedom to America using a bomb threat without even sending a real life agent to talk to him.)

They can literally assign their lowest level agents to “trying to convince socially alienated white people on the internet to commit terrorism” duty. Last time the forum had open registration, half the new posters were saying things like “yall folx gunna been did dat bomb or is yall buncha faggot ass bitchz? We is the hairy-ann race, we needa did dat shit. Yall pussy ass.”

(I’m just joking. It’s a joke about black women working at the FBI.)

The internet is now just a complete minefield of FBI agents trying to justify this fake “domestic terrorism” boogieman hoax they’ve created. They’re apparently getting desperate, because they’ve got Madison Cawthorn – a cripple and a total cuck – out there talking about how he’s planning to bust the people arrested on January 6 out of prison.

At Macon County GOP event yesterday, Madison Cawthorn called January 6 rioters “political hostages,” and spoke of trying to “bust them out.” Then-
Attendee: “When are you gonna call us to Washington again?"
Cawthorn: “We are actively working on that one.”pic.twitter.com/hN96kswnNt

— Aaron Fritschner (@Fritschner) August 30, 2021

So, yeah – no one can register on the forum, currently. I’m trying to figure out a system of invites, so we can get some new people. So maybe if you know someone with an account, in the future you can get an account. But right now, if you’re looking for more great content from the people who brought you Hoax Watch (formerly Tranny Watch), you can read the forum. If you want to flip through my posts there, here’s my account.

I write a lot of long posts there that aren’t totally organized enough to post here on the site. I often say when I’m writing them “I’ll turn this into an article” and then often don’t ever do that.

The Beef

To sort of head toward the point, which is in the title: I’ve been meaning to write a Self-Help Sunday article on the fact that many, most, or maybe even all millennial men appear to view outrageous displays of emotion as somehow representative of masculinity, when in reality, the exact opposite is true.

Displays of anger in particular are looked at as somehow masculine, despite the fact that anger on display is traditionally a feminine behavior. The most obvious example of this is Antifa, where these really weak and disgusting-looking effeminate men act like they’re tough guys because they lash out in tantrums, screaming and smashing things. Obviously, the ability to engage in efficient violence is something masculine, but if you’ve ever met a pro boxer, trained martial artist, or serious solider – people who are good at violence – you will notice that they are typically calm, reserved, and straight-talking. They don’t go around having emotional fits, or try to demonstrate their power by getting angry or acting like a tough guy. As a general matter, acting like a tough guy is inversely correlated with actual toughness, and is instead simply a sign of insecurity and emotional instability.

Obviously, anger is an emotion that we have all felt, and most of us have probably acted on it to some extent or another. But just so, we’ve also all felt sadness or depression, but none of us has ever imagined that crying in public is a masculine activity. It is very solid advice to recognize your own emotions, including anger and sadness, but to also recognize that publicly displaying anger is truly on par with crying in public in terms of its appropriateness for a grown man. Toddlers cry and they also throw temper tantrums. I man who does either is on the emotional level of a toddler.

You will feel anger. You should not act out of anger. Your actions should never be driven by anger. Your actions should be deliberate, and your temperament should be composed. Public displays of anger, like public crying, show a lack of self-control, and a person without self-control cannot be a person expected to be in control of anything else.

Certainly, if you break into an angry rage and beat someone up, or even just intimidate them, you’ve done an action of violence that might make people afraid of you. That can make a person feel powerful, which I think is at the root of this: men should have power, but men in our society have no power; they’ve been stripped of their role as heads of families (providers and protectors), stripped of their roles as respected and skilled professionals, and stripped of their basic dignity, and therefore anything that makes a man feel powerful is prized. So you have this very sad situation where men believe outrageous displays of anger are akin to masculinity.

Ted Kaczynski had some interesting things to say about this issue of power in his manifesto.

Making people afraid of you because you’re an emotionally unstable maniac who threatens and attacks people is not going to result in being respected or developing a positive self image.

Obviously, a composed temperament and deliberate action is an ideal. We are all broken by this social order we suffer under. So getting angry and acting on anger is something that happens, and I do understand it. I have struggled with anger as well. I don’t think it’s likely an exaggeration to say that everyone reading this has. My point is that any display of anger, and related “tough guy” faux machismo, should be a source of shame rather than pride.

This is a bigger issue than what I just wrote, as it has roots in feminism which are important to understand.  There should also be solutions for managing anger, and developing a positive sense of self based on self-control and self-respect. The issue of dealing with women also comes into play here – I’ve seen basically every millennial man I’ve ever known try to channel anger as a way to change the behavior of women. That has never worked, but it makes sense why a man would naturally think it would work. That needs elaborated on**.

In the future, I will rewrite what I just wrote and go into the rest of the details of this issue, and include much better images.

I made some comment about how I intended to write about this issue on the Gamer Uprising, noting that I hadn’t seen many people ever comment on what seems to be a very obvious and important topic, and here is a reader response:

You haven’t seen much comment on such behavior because there isn’t a lot to be said about it.

The root cause is, predictably, kikes.

They pushed feminism, and over decades the empowerment of the female has led to increased custody rights among increasingly divorced females.

Young males instinctively pay attention to figures of authority, and the authority power has been handed over to irrational, petty, vindictive, emotional and uncontrollable women.

Thus, young men who learn such behavior tend to embody and perpetuate the feminine behavior as a means of demonstrating their own “power”.

I need not say this, but it has been – and still is – sickening to witness.

Men should be calm and cool, and always ready to act.

Due to the jewish empowerment of the female, today’s younger men (under 40) are more likely to “act” (a role made for a female) and then be calm and cool when they feel they’ve whined enough and put their feelings on full display — or until they have sufficiently been put in their place (yet again!) by a woman out-womaning them.

…Or they could very well be put in their place by an actual man, for sure.

But there are less and less real men as the years and decades pass, and the younger men drift further away from being able to understand when they’ve been put in their place.

(insert funny closer here)

He didn’t have a funny closer.

I don’t either.

Well, I mean – I have this:

*They are going to start broadcasting vax propaganda into your dreams at some point, guaranteed. In this new moral order, literally anything can now be justified 

**Instead of writing this half article with a pointless rambling introduction, I should just delete the rambling introduction and then save the good part as a draft for a later piece. But I won’t. It’s too late. I have personal things to do today, and the website must have content. But I will write the full article on anger. That day will come. In fact, it should be a chapter in a book that someone should help me edit. Can you imagine how many books worth of good material are on this website, if we were to do the ultimate sifting? 

The #metoo movement has now moved into “abusive and toxic work environment” witch hunting.

Here’s the latest example!

New York Post:

This is part of why women in the workplace is such a toxic concept – men yell, they curse, they engage in “toxic abuse.”

I’m generally anti-anger, as a personal policy, but sometimes in a work environment, you yell as a means to motivate people into pushing themselves to the limit. That doesn’t have to come from a place of anger. Of course, when you can be calm and remain direct, you always should be, but when you’re working on big important projects and the team is not doing what you want – people are going to get yelled at! Fact of life!

Greatness requires people pushing themselves to the limit, and it is the boss’s job to get people to their limits. Sometimes (as in the above dramatic Jobs clip) you drive people past their limits and they have to go – that’s the way it goes! Virtually every great leader is known as an asshole! Leaders have to sacrifice a part of their humanity! The only great leader who is known as being a truly tender soul was Adolf Hitler – and look how he lost that war! Joseph Stalin was a total asshole! People hated him! But he sure as hell got things done, did he not??

FACTS!

Maybe if Hitler wouldn’t have been such a nice guy, we wouldn’t be living in this gay-anal cesspit!

Women don’t understand any of this. They view the professional environment as personal, when it is actually and literally the precise opposite of personal. For a woman, everything is personal.

Obviously, you’re going to have women in a work environment when making a film, just by the nature of it. But imagine putting women in work environments where they are not required. Why would anyone do that? (Aside from the fact that it is literally the law that you have to do that?)

Two things can happen: women can “win” by lobbying for a human resources revolution, in which case any project is going to suffer, or women can end up feeling abused and have psychological breakdowns.

Of course, I’m sure there are now faggot males coming out and saying they felt “abused” and things got “toxic.” This is just a new Marxist attack on competent people, as they try to replace competent white males with brown people.

Brown people, of course, cannot be accused of abuse, because as the master race, they are above reproach. So what you are going to end up with is abusive, incompetent brown people running everything in the Western world.

Meanwhile, China is actively promoting masculinity in society and in the workplace especially, and they could not understand such a term as “toxic work environment.”

Feminism isn’t just about turning women into men. It’s also about turning men into women.

New York Times:

Paid paternity leave in France will be doubled from 14 to 28 days starting next summer, and fathers will be required to take at least a week off work after their babies are born, President Emmanuel Macron announced this week, offering one of the more generous plans in Europe.

“When a baby arrives in the world, there is no reason it should be just the mother who takes care of it,” Mr. Macron said on Wednesday as he announced the plan, arguing that parents should have “more equality in sharing the responsibility from the first day.”

The announcement caps a year of debate in France about the first 1,000 days of a child’s life. In September, the neuropsychiatrist Boris Cyrulnik suggested in a report commissioned by Mr. Macron’s government that fathers should be able to take up to nine weeks’ paid leave.

Mr. Cyrulnik welcomed the extension announced by Mr. Macron, even though it is less ambitious than the report’s suggestion. “It’s a start. Things move gradually — they are not done abruptly,” Mr. Cyrulnik said on France Inter radio. “The presence of the father is much more important than we thought, much earlier than we believed.”

Researchers in Europe have long documented the benefits of paternity leaves on fathers, their partners and their children: Fathers who take paternity leave remain more engaged in parenting, studies show, and are more likely to divide household chores after a long leave. And female partners of men who take paternity leave are less inclined to need anti-anxiety prescriptions.

Well, I guarantee, they’re not doing it to help men. They’re doing it to emasculate men.

If you are offered “paternity leave,” do not take it. Or if you want to take it, go on a fishing and/or camping trip with your father and have him give you advice on how to raise kids. Don’t take any of the advice, but listen to it and act like you’re taking it seriously. You owe him that much for taking the time to inject you into your mother.

If the wife complains about you going on the fishing trip with pops, don’t worry about it. She needs to learn early that you’re not doing that mommy shit. She’s the mommy and she’s going to be the only one in the house taking care of mommy business.

This is not some ultra-alpha Conan the Barbarian shit I’m preaching here: if you’re a man who cares for an infant, you might as well just be a literal tranny. No man at any time in all of history did this, and watching men do it now is beyond the pale. When I see a grown man playing with a baby, I get physically ill.

Don’t hold it, don’t make noises with it, don’t feed it – don’t do any of that shit, ever.

You do NOT want to be a man who cares for infants. It is disgusting and inexcusable.

Oh – and don’t go to the hospital when she’s giving birth, you sick freak!

Have some dignity!

If you’re a father or thinking about becoming one, read this article:

Children are Loud, Stinky, Cruel Terrorists – And Women Love Them

It is not satire. It is the truth, delivered frankly.

Your wife will complain, because she is an insufferable cunt. But understand: if you do the “second mommy” thing, she is going to lose huge amounts of respect for you, and losing respect puts you in a much worse position than if she’s simply angry or even bitter.

She can’t not lose respect for you. It is a biological response of revulsion to see a man caring for an infant, and women respond to these cues a lot stronger than men do.

Don’t be a stroller pusher. 

It is now being reported that after Jerry Falwell Jr. was fired from Liberty University, and then publicly humiliated over an affair that his wife had with the pool boy, he fell down the stairs while drunk and nearly died. This comes after a 911 call by Falwell’s wife was obtained by the Huffington Post.

This is a completely humiliating story which I do not think should be on the internet at all. But given that it is already on the internet, I feel a need to comment on it in defense of Jerry and in defense of men and their need to work.

Daily Mail:

A 911 call made by Jerry Falwell Jr.’s wife just days after his resignation from Liberty University revealed that he was losing ‘a lot of blood’ after allegedly injuring himself on a trash can in a fall while drunk.

In the call record of the incident, Becki Falwell refused to cooperate with officers after she called to report that her husband was bleeding heavily and would not go with her to the hospital, the Huffington Post states.

Dispatchers arrived to find Falwell with lacerations under his left eye, across the bridge of his nose, and above both his right and left eyes, as he slurred his speech with empty alcohol containers nearby.

The call, acquired by the Huffington Post through a Freedom of Information request, took place on August 31, a week after Falwell was forced to move aside as president of the evangelical university founded by his father Jerry Falwell Sr.

He was plagued by a string of controversies culminating in a claim from a former poolboy that he had an affair with Becki Falwell for years with the consent of her husband.

One week after the allegations of Giancarlo Granda, now 29, were published by Reuters, first responders were called to the Falwell couple’s home in Bedford County, Virginia, at 2.30am.

Audio from the 911 call involves Becki Falwell telling the dispatcher that she had been at church at 11pm that night when she received a call from her husband to say he was injured.

She says that she was forced to break a door in with a chair after finding their home locked and discovered her husband surrounded by ‘a lot of blood right now’ after a fall down the stairs.

Becki confirmed to the dispatcher that her husband had been drinking but when asked if he was drinking heavily, she refused to cooperate stating: ‘I’m not going to answer that question.’

She was told that the information was important to understand how severe his injuries were as alcohol thins the blood to which she responded: ‘The more I tell you the name, the more you’re going to understand why we’re not talking to you right now’.

You might think, “oh, well, the Daily Mail is a tabloid, so of course they’re covering this.”

But no.

This story is on every single news site right now, as the Jewish media delights in this Christian man’s humiliation.

I have written in some detail about the shameful way that the Christian community threw this man under the bus, and how poorly this reflects on the Christian community in America as a whole. This entire American concept of picking apart the private lives of every public figure is voyeuristic and vile.

Related: Evangelical “Christians” Attack the Only Woman in Entertainment to Stay Married Over Slutty Joke Photo

Further, we should note that the media wants to completely and totally destroy any Christian man who fights for the values of Christian civilization, and for God. Jerry Falwell Jr. did more than virtually any other living Christian in America to defend the Christian faith. In a time when most churches are flying gay flags and celebrating “Black Lives,” Jerry Falwell was fighting against abortion and homosexuality, and defending President Trump.

It wasn’t enough for the media to get him fired. It wasn’t enough for them to humiliate him by publishing lurid details about his wife’s affair. They had to take it a step further, and humiliate him even more. They had to publish details of his falling down and nearly dying, drunk in a pool of his own blood, a state that they put him in after they took everything from him.

Nothing is ever enough for these Jews. There is no point at which they say, “he’s done. We can stop humiliating him now.” They want to take every last shred of your dignity, they want you to die with nothing. It is a level of sadism that is impossible for a normal human to grasp.

But there is another issue here, and that is what happens to a man when he is prevented from working.

With the drunken fall, we should understand this: a man is nothing without his work. There is nothing more difficult for a man than being denied his work. It is shocking and disgusting to me the way that millennial men seem to not care about work, and I think that this is very much tied to the lack of masculinity we see among millennial men.

For a man with masculinity, his entire image of himself is tied to his work, and that is absolutely the way it should be. In this modern period, men seem to be attempting to tie their identity to their hobbies, their preferences in entertainment, and most abysmally, to the women in their lives. You cannot ever be an actual man if you do not work and draw meaning from that work.

This topic of the importance of work was going to be one of the main focuses of the book I was preparing to publish on advice for young men. Obviously, the coronavirus hoax has wiped out many opportunities that men had for careers and for building businesses, so much of what I wrote is no longer valid. However, even in this dark time, it is of the utmost importance that men figure out a way to work.

These welfare programs that are offered to men are a deal with the devil, where you are asked to sacrifice your identity for food. Many men, apparently, embraced this idea of welfare when they were offered it at the beginning of this coronavirus crisis. This is very sad and it is shameful. To temporarily be paid to not work is one thing, but to enter into a situation where you are a permanent ward of the state is something where they might as well just castrate you.

Of course, what the system wants is a bunch of men who do not work, and they are more than willing to throw them a few bucks for food if they agree not to work. They know that these men will be broken, and have no desire to fight. As you see with Jerry Falwell, a man who was very strong and capable, who accomplished amazing things while running Liberty University, was reduced to a pathetic creature bleeding on the ground, incapable of getting up off the floor, when his work was taken from him.

Times are very dark. It feels very much like there is no future. However, most of that is out of our hands. We are simply along for the ride here, and all we can do is react to it in the healthiest ways we can manage. As you are dealing with this fallout from the coronavirus hoax, I implore you this: do whatever you have to do to be able to work. I don’t care if they’re paying you more if you’re on welfare, or if it is the worst job on earth. You need to work, in order to remain sane and connected to reality and to yourself.

No matter how bad things get, find a way to work.

When you have work, thank God for it.

On Monday, CNN employee Patrick Hogan started a moral crusade to get Daily Stormer kicked off of Google News, because I had taken the number one spot in “recommended articles” for a review I’d written of Star Trek: Picard.

It is absolutely stunning to me that Google's news product not only doesn't blacklist proudly neo-Nazi websites, but goes on to recommend their articles on Star Trek at the very top of my Android feed. pic.twitter.com/DJuz3tN7n9

— Patrick 🌆 Hogan (@phogan) February 10, 2020

As I said Tuesday, it is fascinating that members of the mainstream corporate media itself are the ones launching crusades against independent media, using the claim that we are evil to justify their attacks. But within that is the fact that Patrick Hogan is an individual person, a biological male, who saw my article on Google News and made the decision to launch a crusade. Part of that is clearly going to be guided by his position as a member of the mainstream media, and the desire to crush what he views as the competitors of his employer. But he could just as easily have said “you know what, it would really be humiliating for me to go out and complain about this, so I’m gonna let someone else do it – I’m a professional journalist and I don’t get paid to be CNN’s internet police.”

So, I thought a lot about this sad, grotesquely obese middle-aged millennial man who is clearly not even a little bit Jewish.

I was talking to a friend about it, and I said “I feel dumb psychoanalyzing people, but I mean, just look at this guy…”

And then I realized: everything anyone does is a result of some kind of internal mechanism, and if it isn’t out of hunger, horniness or a desire to be warm, then it is the result of psychology. So psychoanalyzing people is not necessarily always wrong, especially when you have a fat neckbeard going on a crusade against you because he thinks you’re morally evil because of your political views. Going out of your way to attempt to restrict everyone on earth from viewing a review of a science fiction television show because you believe the writer is morally evil is a very extreme action, which is difficult to even comprehend. There is no way you can understand it without psychoanalysis.

The reason I’m self-conscious about psychoanalyzing Patrick Hogan is really that it takes an extreme degree of psychoanalysis to unravel his motives. Plus, I know that he’s psychoanalyzing me and everyone who thinks like me in the dumbest possible way in order to justify his own existence because he has issues with his mother, and I don’t want to sink to his level.

But I mean, seriously:

I’ve had women complain about articles I wrote about women, and stating why they were complaining was very simple.

But even saying “you mad” is a form of analyzing psychological motives. It isn’t “psychoanalysis” because it is obvious.

That’s really what people like Patrick Hogan could say about us – “they’re mad because their country is controlled by Jews and they’re doing all of these weird things to them that they don’t like.”

Instead, they go into all of this bizarre stuff about our penises, our socioeconomic status and our achievements.

• My penis is fine (you’ll just have to trust me on that or ask Lauren Southern).
• I’ve got what I assume is the same socioeconomic background as Patrick Hogan (I also went to school for English literature).
• I’m proud of my achievements, which I think are objectively commendable. By the age of thirty, my publication was a household name, and I did this with nothing other than a laptop. Even the context of Patrick Hogan attacking me is about my achievement – I got to the “recommended articles” section of Google News because people were reading my article.

Of course, I’m a unique case, as I’ve destroyed my own life in order to promote the agenda of defending white men from all of our enemies.

So I probably should be psychoanalyzed beyond “he’s mad because of all of the things Jews are doing to him.” And I’m willing to do that right now, before I even touch Patrick Hogan’s fat rolls (which he grew as a result of an attempt to feed an emotional emptiness created by his relationship with his mother).

An honest psychoanalysis of myself would reveal primarily stunted adolescent traits:

• I’m romantic, in an adolescent way. I feel that fighting against injustice and oppression is something that should be done because it is the right thing to do, in a way that is mildly sappy and self-indulgent. A man of my age should be a lot more jaded, and not driven by things like “because it’s the right thing to do.”
• I’m rebellious and self-destructive, as well as outwardly destructive, in an adolescent way. My image of myself is based in some significant part on my willingness to do things that other people wouldn’t dream of doing, and laughing at the consequences. I have a sadistic and destructive sense of humor, and I believe that all suffering ultimately amounts to the universe laughing at you. And because it is only appropriate that a psychoanalysis should contain something sexual: part of the rebelliousness was probably amplified by a need to stand out to women in high school, given that I was relatively short. However, it was there before that (and I wasn’t relatively short until high school). Of course, any form of performative male rebelliousness is (probably primarily) a sexual strategy, and performative rebelliousness is not a trait exclusive to short people. To whatever extent mine is unique, it probably has more to do with the way I reacted to my parents’ divorce (and yes, of course I blame Jews for my parents’ divorce).
• I’m especially prone to religiosity (see adolescent romanticism and self-destructiveness).

I think that’s pretty self-critical, no? I’m sure there’s more that I’m not aware of, but I don’t think my psychological profile is particularly unique or interesting. What is unique about me is primarily that I was born at the exact time when being irrationally romantic and rebellious meant being right-wing, and that I happened to be more intelligent and creative than most people who carry these particular adolescent psychological traits. Much more importantly: I have a work ethic that is not in any way typically associated with these adolescent traits. Most importantly: I was uniquely able to avoid developing an addiction to opiates. (Never forget that 99% of the people God sent us to be artists are lying on some floor with a needle in their arm as you read this.)

You would find a lot of left-wing people who have a similar psychological profile. Due to lesser intelligence, they believe that they, as rebellious individuals, should be fighting Donald Trump’s fascism and romantic people should be defending the human rights of Somalian refugees.

And before someone says “OMG you just put your entire psychological profile on the internet!” – it’s all available here, every day, in the text of this site, for anyone who is interested. All I’ve done just now is demonstrate that I’m aware of it.

When you add in the fact that weev showed up to keep the site online for me for his own psychological reasons (he’s certainly not doing it for the money), and the way everything else has come together so perfectly, you end up with something which I believe was ordained by God. But that may well simply be my romantic psychology talking.

So, let’s move on to Patrick Hogan.

Patrick Hogan is a Wasted Human Life, And Thinking About Him Makes Me Sad

Patrick Hogan would not do his own psychoanalysis, as I just did my own psychoanalysis, because he is a weak and pathetic individual. For I tell you this: there is no such thing as a noble fatboy. Maybe a man over 50 who develops health problems that cause him to gain weight can be both noble and fat, but a man in his mid-thirties is fat simply because he is weak and pathetic and there is no excuse.

I know that some of the readers are fat, and it would be easier for me to simply not be so hard on fat people, especially given that the site is totally broke and we function on donations, but this is simply the truth: if you are fat, you are weak and pathetic and you are putting your personal inability to control something so basic as what you shovel into your mouth on public display for the world to see. And you should be ashamed. You should let that shame drive you to change what you are. And yes, it is “what you are” – if you are fat, then being fat is the defining characteristic of your personhood.

If you do not respect yourself, no one else ever will. All achievement is based on self-control, and the ability to control oneself is the defining aspect of manhood.

Most aspects of this pitiful man are not interesting. He is a normal white guy who in previous times would have been a farmer or a factory worker, but his soul has been crushed by modernity. He is the epitome of the ideal form of what Jews want us all to be, and that is why he is interesting to me. He is an impotent, fat, weak, spineless coward who believes what he’s supposed to believe, watches what he’s supposed to watch, says what he’s supposed to say, and thinks what he’s supposed to think.

By looking at his face, I can tell you with a 99% certainty:

• He either really likes Marvel movies or makes a big thing of how he is unique because he doesn’t like Marvel movies.
• He is too dumb to like any actually good science fiction. He unironically watches Star Trek: Discovery – and Picard. He liked the JJ Abrams movies. He has only seen the odd episode of the actual Star Trek, but he likes to think he knows something about them. He is the target audience of Alex Kurtzman’s Star Trek.
• He has never been intimate with a woman and is too much of a coward to fly to Southeast Asia and have sex with hookers. He justifies his fear with white knight bullshit about “exploitation,” even while he has no problem basing his entire sexual psychology around pornography. He has a favorite porn star that he imagines is his girlfriend. He has weird sexual fetishes which may include being a furry.
• His entire identity is wrapped up in the shittiest conceivable bits of pop culture.
• He plays the worst imaginable video games. Games which are neither nerd games nor normie games.
• He came from a middle class background.
• He isn’t from New York City and is really excited about living there.
• He’s been in therapy since he was a child and is on psychotropic drugs for “depression and/or anxiety.”
• He went to college for a humanities degree, probably English literature or film, probably got a master’s degree, and his image of himself is as some kind of creative.
• He looks up to Kevin Smith as a fat loser who was also creative and so was able to marry a normal looking woman.
• If you asked him if he loved science, he would say “yes.”
• He was raised Irish Catholic.
• His father is a weak man, but not as weak as he is. His father has always said “I’ll support you in whatever you do,” because his father was affected by stupid boomer memes of evil parents controlling their kids’ lives. And yet, somewhere inside of him, he can’t help being ashamed that this roly-poly blob is his legacy.
• Although he himself is a heterosexual, he thinks homosexual issues are much more important than his own life.
• He collects toys.

I can tell you with 100% certainty:

• He thinks he’s special.

In the most gross sense, Patrick Hogan believes that there is something unique about him, some magic inside of him that makes him different than other people. Due to the fat in his brain exacerbating his crippling lack of self-awareness, he would never be capable of even wondering if this belief that he is special came from Harry Potter. (It did come from Harry Potter.)

He believes in his heart that some day he will meet a woman who recognizes that specialness inside of him, and she will fulfill him.

Of course, as any grown adult knows, no one is special. Everyone is just a combination of genetics and experiences. But if he were to let go of his belief that he is special, his entire psyche would collapse, because he would have to acknowledge that he is nothing more than a fat slob with a completely meaningless existence.

This modern conception of “specialness” has to do with a religious-type belief that something magical will happen in the future. This is usually associated with some romantic achievement. This modern “my thing is that I’m special” identity really only is actually relevant to men, as every woman on earth from the beginning of time has always believed she was the center of the universe. It is the defining characteristic of the human female, and I would not be the least bit surprised if the principle applies to all female primates.

This entire phenomenon of everyone wanting to be “creative” is a result of the delusion of specialness. The idea that everyone is somehow a uniquely talented artist is obscene and actually dystopian.

This is really Patrick Hogan’s background on his Twitter profile:

Just for the record, I had already written most of this essay before I saw that. Everything about this repulsive individual is written all over his face in the one publicly available picture of him.

And you might say: “but Anglin, didn’t you just describe to us how you’re special?”

No, I did the exact opposite. I explained how everything about me was shaped by very normal mechanisms, and that anything unique about me is simply a result of mundane factors lining up by providence.

So, let’s get to the meat of the thing: Why did he report my article?

We’re going to need subheadings here.

Jealousy

I know for a fact that this fatboy wants to be some kind of “creative,” and has been told his whole life he can “be whatever he wants to be” (literally the worst possible thing to tell children, by the way, and I don’t even think Jews were responsible for that one), if he did all the right things. I did none of the right things – in fact, I did all of the opposite of the right things – and became a successful and infamous cultural figure.

With all of these journalists that go out of their way to attack me, there is an underlying stench of simple jealousy that they have failed in their creative pursuits, and I have not. That leads to them wanting to destroy me.

I also think there’s a second type of jealousy that is more general among these weaklings: I think they are jealous of the courage to question the system, to use critical thinking and analyze what we’re being fed. It takes a lot of strength to question anything when you grow up in this complete system of control, and the ability to question it is masculine. So the cowardly fatboy is jealous of my audacity to think critically in the same way that he is jealous of my shredded abs.

Fear

The idea that anyone, anywhere, is not going along with the system strikes fear into the hearts of cogs in this system. They fear that someone else could be right. To have someone as hated as a “neo-Nazi” hitting the top of the charts on Google terrifies them. This makes them question just how many people there are that are not going along with it.

There is no one on earth more alienated than Patrick Hogan; the system he has embraced is defined by alienation and he is the perfect disciple of that system. But he can’t admit that it is the system that made him this way, because the system must be good, as it defines him and he is good. So the alienation must be coming from those few people who remain outside of this system. These people talk about how we “blame the other” in-between hunts for Russian hackers and politically incorrect Star Trek reviews.

If the fatboy Patrick Hogan were to ever question any single aspect of what he believes, the whole thing would come crumbling down. And far from simply changing his world outlook, he would be required to accept that everything he did in life was wrong. He was never special. It wasn’t okay to be fat. His “depression” wasn’t the result of a “chemical imbalance.” He is not creative and no one will ever think he is. No woman will ever love him.

He doesn’t think about any of this, but there is a deep fear in him of anything that could make him think about this. He just wants the bad people who think the bad things to go away, so he can think the good things and be a good boy with his toys.

Social Approval (Good Boy Points)

Modern post-man men like Patrick Hogan have a deep psychological association between social approval and the approval of their mothers and female school teachers. This is one of the primary reasons why we have so many empowered women: because this kind of creature thinks he needs them around to pat him on the head.

Everything they do is just: “mommy, look what I made at school today!”

It is a Stockholm syndrome situation, where overbearing women defined his childhood, and so everything he does in life revolves around trying to please women.

Signaling virtuousness is at the core of the quest for female approval for most men with Mommy syndrome. Demonstrating how much they love immigrants and homosexuals and Michael Burnham and how much they hate Nazis and Donald Trump are acts equivalent of bringing home an A+ on the test to show mommy.

Note that this is the opposite of what it should be, where the boy’s value after the age of 5 is instead defined by his ability to please his father, not by being a subservient “good boy,” but by accomplishing things that are useful. A mother wants boys to be obedient and a father wants them to be independent. But there were no strong men around for most boys. Most were surrounded by women throughout all of their developmental years, with fathers that were either run out of the house or cowed into submission by the mother. (I often wonder if boys with divorced parents aren’t likely to have had a better childhood, as it indicates it was less likely that the father’s will was broken by the mother.) These boys never emerged from the early childhood stages of trying to please their mothers in order to get the reward of affection, and that is where they remain, psychologically.

This is of course mixed in with sexuality (homosexual men do not have this same desire to please women, despite their severe issues with their mothers), where the men vaguely believe that sexual attention is a kind of reward for good behavior.

The soft nature of these men is also a part of being subservient to women.

Fundamentally, these perverse mockeries of men are little tattletale rats, because teacher will be happy if he tells her what the bad boys are up to.

Of course, maybe this is all a lot of gibberish. Maybe he was just mad that the article called him a dumbass for liking Picard.