Get yo stupid fat ugly mopey ass up out this bitch, nigga.

Peace.

The Guardian:

A government minister has said he will stand down at the next general election after a series of death threats and an arson attack on his constituency office.

The minister for courts and legal services, Mike Freer, said that “by the skin of my teeth I avoided being murdered” by Ali Harbi Ali, who went on to kill the Southend West MP Sir David Amess in 2021.

“There comes a point when the threats to your personal safety become too much,” he told the Daily Mail.

Mike Freer with his “husband”

Freer, the MP for London’s Finchley and Golders Green seat since 2010, said it was time to “say enough” as he could no longer put his family through the anxiety for his safety.

The MP and his staff have wear stab vests when attending scheduled public events in his constituency after learning that Ali had watched his Finchley office before going on to murder Amess at a constituency surgery on 15 October 2021.

Freer said: “I was very lucky that actually on the day I was due to be in Finchley, I happened to change my plans and came into Whitehall.

“Otherwise who knows whether I would have been attacked or survived an attack. He said he came to Finchley to attack me.”

He said MPs tend to try to “make light” of threats, but that it remained at the back of his mind that he could have been killed.

Killed!

They’ll kill his ugly ass for shilling too hard for Jews!

This Jewish shill game is not a joke!

Niggas gets killed out there when they be shilling!

Freer said he had also received threats from the group Muslims Against Crusades “about coming to stab me” and found “mock molotov cocktails on the office steps”.

The arson attack on his north London constituency office in December was “the final straw”, he said.

Oh noes

Freer, who has pro-Israel views and represents the constituency with the highest proportion of Jewish voters, said he could not divorce antisemitism from the intimidation.

He won his seat by about 6,600 votes at the 2019 election, seeing off the Liberal Democrat challenger, Luciana Berger.

Luciana Berger is an actual Jewess. (We’ve had some run-ins with that bitch, check here. -ED.)

If the most Jewish constituency in Britain picked this guy over one of their own, you know he’s a hardcore shabbos goy.

I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to find out that the breakaway parliamentary group – whose ranks comprised disaffected Labour and Conservative MPs – is being bankrolled by Jews. Absolutely no one could have predicted this.

With 3 “Conservatives” and 7 Labourites, led (informally, as yet) by the Jewess Luciana Berger and the half-negro (Spear)Chuka Umunna, its backers hope that what is so far just a parliamentary grouping will be the nucleus of a future party that will break apart the traditional British party system and, ultimately, eclipse the “antisemitic” Labour party.

Their two issues seem to be:

Stopping Brexit

and

Suppressing “antisemitism”

Their working definition of “antisemitism” seems to be any critical remarks about Jews or anything Jews feel strongly about, or any goyspeech at all that gives Jews disagreeable feelings when they read or hear it, even if reading or hearing it involves paid minions in Jewish propaganda groups spending hours trawling through obscure web pages to find the “offensive” remarks in question, then drawing them to the world’s attention, complete with histrionic speeches about the “Holocaust” and how their dear old granny died in it, claiming the impact of those terrible words upon their consciousness made them feel “unsafe”.

It is mind-stonkingly, breath-takingly surprising to find that this subversive outfit is being financed by Jews.

Sir David Garrard

Step forward Sir David Garrard and Sir Trevor Chinn. You may remember this pair of dodgy characters from Tom Watson’s list of donors, both on the board of the Jewish Leadership Council. Watson is still deputy leader of the Labour party, constantly promoting the “antisemitism” agenda and generally acting as a wrecking ball to Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership. As has so often been alleged against them throughout history, therefore, the Jews are financing both sides in a war: the Labour party itself, and the group breaking away from it!

Because of the nature of the British electoral system, it’s doubtful that this attempt at subversion could succeed in the long run. But for the Jews’ purposes to be fulfilled, it doesn’t have to. It just needs to offer them a temporary expedient they can use to thwart Brexit by offering MPs an escape from their party’s internal disciplinary processes; and to serve as an anvil against which Jeremy Corbyn can be cracked. Yesterday offered a perfect illustration of how this will work.

Chris Williamson, a Corbyn ally, was shown saying that the party’s response to bogus accusations of antisemitism had been weak.

For this he was bogusly accused of antisemitism, and Corbyn weakly capitulated to his accusers by suspending him from the party.

But the way this happened was interesting. Corbyn, reportedly at first, was not minded to take any action against Williamson. There was then a furious meeting of the parliamentary party at which as many as 38 MPs threatened to leave the party and join the breakaway group unless Williamson was suspended. Corbyn was forced to give in. This will now be the regular modus operandi of the Jews and their shabbos goyim. Anyone who dares to talk back to the Chosen, or to challenge their agenda in any way, will face similar demands, backed up by the threat to leave the party for the breakaway group.

It is a stunning illustration of Jewish power that they have been able to disrupt and subvert Labour as completely as they have, over such a prolonged period, while suffering little or no public criticism of their conduct. Even those having their lives or careers destroyed by Jewish Power dare not call it out or challenge it overtly.

Labour got only 20 thousand votes from Jews (amounting to 13-14% of the Jewish vote) at either of the last 2 general elections. It is utterly insignificant. Yet somehow they have allowed themselves to be drawn into a years-long civil war over how strenuously they should pander to the ethno-narcissistic concerns of this tiny group of people. It is astonishing. Equally astonishing is the complete domination of public discourse by the Jews and their catspaws. The vast majority of Labour party members think, correctly, that the antisemitism accusations are a contrived exercise in defamation motivated by a desire to protect Israel from Jeremy Corbyn’s critique. Yet their voices are never heard in the media, whose presentation is entirely one-sided and in favour of the Jews. Newspapers like the Guardian publish Jewish screeds on the issue then turn the comments off so the goy can’t talk back. Sky News hosts “debates” on the issue in which every person in the debate has the same view: “it’s impossible to be too tough on antisemitism”.

The fact that Jewish racists have been able successfully to portray a far-left party committed to the open-borders racial annihilation of its own people as racist is yet further testimony to their extraordinary power. With such complete domination of public speech, reality can be turned on its head.

You see this process illustrated in this video (the same one mentioned above in the news clip about Chris Williamson).

It tells the tale of how a half-black, half-Jewish woman was destroyed because she claimed that Jews financed the transatlantic slave trade and called it an “African Holocaust”. The Jews just kept badgering the party with complaints about her, until eventually she was suspended, even though the complaint they had made about her made no real sense.

Bear in mind that this video was made by and for far-leftists. But it still contains enough interesting detail about the operation of Jewish power to make it of use to far-rightists.

Luciana “Double Bagel Neck” Burger

Yet another case study in hypocrisy from the Chosen People.

First, here’s an incident they were complaining about a few days ago.

A local Labour party member, Sir Michael Duncan, complains that the “Jewish community plans to attack our party.”

Jews then attacked his party, claiming that his statement that they planned to attack his party was antisemitic and false.

Jew Mike Katz complained:

“Talking about an undemocratic elite, talking about the Jews acting as a whole community to attack the Labour party, that really plays into some of the oldest antisemitic tropes about Jews being conspiratorial, acting in secrecy, as some sort of cult, to try and influence politics”.

Yet top Jew, milord Daniel Finkelstein offered an interesting revelation in a recent Times article as he reflected on the departure of the monstrous Luciana Berger from the Labour party.

The Times:

Yesterday, in modern Britain, a young woman was driven out of Britain’s biggest progressive party by people who hate Jews and by other people who won’t do anything about it. Set against that, so much else just seems blah.

I attend meetings of the Jewish community where we discuss the problem and what to do about it. The room is full of dynamic people used to getting things done. There’s plenty of strength there and determination and brains too. Yet we all feel numb.

Finkelstein made a similar admission about Jewish collective political strategising a few years ago. Of course there were no consequences, just as there will be none now. Danny the Fink (his chosen Twitter handle) won’t lose his job or be accused of promoting “antisemitic tropes” by acknowledging that a clique of powerful Jews meet in secret to plot political change. But poor Sir Michael Duncan, who earned a knighthood by making distinguished contributions to engineering, doing something real, building things, will probably now be chased from his political party by mere artful wordsmiths and manipulators for the crime of noticing that a hostile elite is pursuing an agenda of its own, disconnected from the interests of the country it is living in.

The best illustration of the power of the Jews is that they can tauntingly admit something in one of their own articles one day then destroy your life for pointing it out the next. We are living in an ethno-tyranny.

Our old enemy Luciana Berger is back, and she’s now taken the title of “fattest kike in merry old England.”

The greasy Jewish wench is up to her old tricks again, getting people arrested for alleged crimes of speaking their mind.

Daily Mail:

An internet troll has been jailed after making anti-Semitic death threats to a Labour MP, telling her she would ‘get it like Jo Cox’.

John Nimmo, 28, from South Shields, sent two threatening emails to Luciana Berger.

The messages included a picture of a large knife and Ms Berger was told to ‘watch your back Jewish scum’.

The messages to the MP for Liverpool Wavertree came just three weeks after fellow MP Jo Cox was killed.

The former shadow minister for mental health said the messages had caused her ‘great fear and anguish’.

She said: ‘It caused me to feel physically sick being threatened in such a way.

‘I was extremely concerned for my safety and I felt completely under threat.

‘I had previously received anti-Semitic messages and threats but the reference to Jo Cox was terrifying.

‘The biggest concern was not knowing who this was, for all I knew the offender could have resided next door to me.’

That is to say: “oy vey, it’s like another Shoah.”

And we don’t even know if these emails made threats or not. They have not produced the actual emails.

He looks like a good lad.

In a separate incident he sent offensive emails to an anti-hate crime organisation including threats to burn down a mosque.

Prosecutor Mark Giuliani told Newcastle Crown Court the messages to Faith Matters, which offer an online hate crime reporting system, included pictures of dead bodies and the words death to Muslims.

Nimmo, who appeared by video link from prison, was also sentenced for three charges relating to anti-Semitic tweets and accusing a woman of being a paedophile.

Nimmo was imprisoned in 2014 for eight weeks after sending abusive messages on Twitter to feminist campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez and MP Stella Creasy.

It came after Ms Criado-Perez led a campaign using social media for a female figure to appear on a Bank of England note.

Jailing him for two years and three months for the nine offences, Judge Robert Adams said he ’caused terror, fear and paranoia’.

Two years and three months.

For messages sent from his computer.

Allegedly.

He said the crimes were cowardly attacks ‘done from the comfort of your own home where you thought you could never be identified which caused misery to other people’.

He said the attack on Ms Berger was the most serious of them all, because ‘it involved a lady who is Jewish and a democratically elected Member of Parliament’.

Yes, of course it’s more serious if she’s Jewish.

After all, they’re god’s chosen people, donchano mate?

Vic Laffey, defending, said the offences had caused ‘enormous distress’ to the victims and said Nimmo lived an isolated life and suffered from Aspergerss Syndrome.

…

Speaking after the sentencing, Ms Berger said: ‘Every day, up and down our country, people experience vile racist abuse, harassment and violence.

‘Too often people feel that they can’t report these horrific crimes.

‘I hope that if any good at all can come from this traumatic experience it is that others will see that you do not have to suffer in silence. Action will be taken.

‘I would encourage anyone affected to report these crimes.

‘Together, we can stand up to and defeat the racists in our communities.’

You’re the racist, you fat slobbery Jew.

You come to someone else’s country then demand they do everything to make you feel comfortable – including imprisoning their own countrymen.

It’s absolutely disgusting.

Take Note

Remember that this can happen to you.

If you are in the US and sending hate messages, make sure there is nothing that could be construed as a threat. If you’re in a country with hatespeech laws, you probably want to avoid sending anyone direct hate messages of any kind. It just isn’t ever really clear what is or isn’t hatespeech under these laws.

Anyway – here’s her twitter.

@lucianaberger

Our man Bonehill

Last year 650,000 invaders were deliberately let in to Britain by our politicians.

This is The Old Bailey, the highest court in the land.

It is where Joshua Bonehill is standing trial. What did he do? Murder, kidnap, rape, robbery, carry out an act of espionage, commit an act of national treachery?

No, he opposed the invasion by criticising those letting in the invaders. And he criticised those pushing the white genocide agenda. He criticised Luciana Berger for her long running promotion of Jewish interests rather than the interests of her constituents, and her persecution of those patriots pushing Britain’s interests by opposing the white genocide agenda. As part of his campaign he did some computer graphic cartoons. He’s a cartoonist. A satirist. And for this he is standing trial and facing up to a further 3 years in prison.

Free speech, free expression, free debate are only allowed if it is what (((the globalist liberal elite))) approves of, hence ‘je suis Charlie Hebdo’. The treacherous politicians should be standing trial – not Joshua Bonehill. So I say ‘Je suis Joshua Bonehill!

The official charge is ‘Racially aggravated harassment’ and relates to 5 on line articles, published between October 2014 and January 2015. These were in the public domain and of the authorities were aware of them, when Joshua first faced trial on 14th December 2015 for the similar offence of speaking out and creating cartoons against the Jewish vigilante ‘police’ force of North London, The Shomrim. He was convicted at that trial and given a prison sentence for that offence of 3 years and 4 months. Nowadays murderers get less. Criminals of all types get tried for all their known crimes at the same time in one trial. Patriots who dare to speak the truth are treated far worse. ZOG could keep on finding online articles and cartoons by Joshua and keep on prosecuting him every year and keep on adding to his sentence for ever, literally. The silence by the legal profession is deafening.

Lookin plump, Luciana!

Luciana Berger, Member of Parliament for Wavertree, Merseyside where she is rumoured to bully non-Jewish Labour Party members, has made a successful and lucrative career out of ‘tackling anti-Semitism’. She started off in the National Union of Students – obsessing about anti-Semitism within the NUS – so much so that even that hotbed of Jewish Marxists kicked her out. Moving into the Labour Party proper her strident Jewishness secured her a safe seat in Parliament and favoured insider status meaning a warning is sent to (((the media moguls))) that she is never to be criticised.

She’s had all sorts of minor roles, being groomed as she is for top level Ministerial status, but prominently has also been a key player in The Labour Friends of Israel and has chaired The Labour Jewish Movement. She features in all the favourite Jewish campaigns for diversity, vibrancy, enrichment, tolerance, abortion on demand, more mass immigration, preventing the internet from being a tool for spreading the truth and of course punishing those who dare to speak out about it all.

So far she’s been instrumental in having 2 White men jailed – her constituent 21 year-old Garron Helm in 2014 for daring to create a cartoon of her with the superscription ‘Trust a Jew to behave like a Jew’, and 28 year-old John Nimmo, who was jailed earlier this year. This then was her third time in the witness box in order to send a White Man to prison for opposing the Jewish Agenda, and she’s getting rather good at playing the oh-so-innocent, shocked, dazed, confused little girl – the jury are supposed to lap it up, but to me, she looked smarmy, swarthy, ugly and one couldn’t help thinking of a big fat smirking tabby cat gazing down on a crowd of adoring spellbound mice.

The only ones not in awe were the judge – a rather tough looking mouse in a red robe and white wig by the name of Senior Judge Mr Justice Spencer; a rather timid but brave barrister, QC for the defence Mr Godfrey; and a rather relaxed, casual, looking as if he was enjoying it all, dapper mouse in the dock Joshua Bonehill.

The jury when it was sworn in was composed of 9 women (3 of whom were non-white) and 3 White men – seemed a bit lopsided to me having 75% women, but complaints can only be raised when it is men in the majority. C’est la P.C. vie.

When QC Philip Stott for the prosecution asked her to relate her horror regarding Joshua’s posts Berger purred and simpered. It was different though when Godfrey took his turn, she began to scowl, and glare.

I must say I didn’t expect much from the Godfrey chap, but in his timid, deferential, hesitating way he cross-examined and demolished Luciana Berger – and she won’t forget it, neither will Jews generally – expect to spend the rest of your life working for legal aid cases Godfrey!

Basically the defence was that Joshua Bonehill’s 5 articles and cartoons were all concerning items that were in the public domain as reasonably accepted facts; they were never sent by him to Berger; they were not meant for Berger; they were satire; they weren’t specifically just about her, concerning as they did a range of legitimate issues – one of them covered Jewish over-representation in British politics and the Labour Party; one of them didn’t even mention her name; he never encouraged malicious tweets to her – the trolling campaign was launched and sustained from the USA and the article ‘The Legacy of Operation Filthy Jew Bitch’ was as it said looking BACK at the campaign that was directed from the USA.

This is the sort of cartoon that gets you sent to prison is once-merry old England.

Under cross examination the fat tabby cat, sorry, Berger, agreed that about 0.2% of Britain’s population was Jewish (and therefore in all fairness only 1 in 500 MPs should be Jewish), but said she did not to know how many Jewish MPs there were in the Labour Party or Parliament – ‘You claim not to know despite you being the Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement?’ queried Godfrey, uneasy shuffling from the prosecution benches. (Ye Gods – one day (((they))) will crucify him for that I thought!) The tabby cat angered by her ordeal and sensing her chance of gobbling up Joshua may be slipping, lashed out with the sentence ‘’That Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer – there’s still a European Arrest warrant outstanding against him for anti-Semitism.’’

And you think that gives you power over me?

Interesting. However anti-Semitism isn’t actually a crime, for the very real fact that it is very hard to define. As Sam Francis once said, an anti-Semite used to mean someone who does not like Jews, now it means someone the Jews don’t like. Joshua Bonehill and Andrew Anglin are definitely people (((they))) don’t like.

Joshua is on trial for harassment, not for racism or anti-Semitism, and if it is found that he has not harassed Lucian Berger, then he must be found ‘not guilty’. A sensible, intelligent jury made up of 12 White men endowed with common sense would find him so. But there lies the rub, for the (((elite))) of this country relies on us being brainwashed, feminized, infantilized, dumbed down and increasingly non-white. The judgement is expected on Thursday 8th December, but don’t expect justice.

His only chance of winning, bearing in mind the makeup of the jury, is to take the witness box and smile his cheerful friendly smile; if he does that he just may swing them in his favour. Come what may his mood is good, and a cheeky wink and smile to the public gallery at the end of the day shows his morale is high whatever the outcome.

Bonehill is the sort of lad can certainly manage a cheeky wink. Godspeed, ye noble champion of truth and justice.

‘’Apathy and cowardice are the terminal characteristics of a dying society’’ – Aristotle

Once we’ve won and we’ve brought back the golden age, certain people will have some difficult questions to answer.

Daddy – what did you do in the great liberation struggle to save the white race?

Nothing.

Why? Is it because you were a coward?

No, it was because I didn’t want to be called a racist.

Why?

Because I was afraid of losing my job.

Why?

Because I didn’t want to be poor and ostracised.

Why?

Because I wanted to be liked.

Why?

Because, well, yes, because I was a coward.

We can quibble about the translation of Aristotle’s words and meaning, but today laziness and timidity are there for all to see, and nowhere more so than among those who should be leading our people out of the deadly quagmire in which it finds itself, because this, of all times, is not a time for cowardice.

We’re Not Dying a Natural Death, We’re Being Killed

The evil and alien power-masters keep themselves safely secure as our society declines. They preach and brutally enforce ‘tolerance’ for everything that harms our society, and simultaneously ‘zero tolerance’ for everything that is healthy, good and vital for us. Alone – this stark fact is enough to show us that our secret rulers are in no way part of ‘us’ and that they actually have our complete destruction as their aim. Anyone not blind, bamboozled or brainwashed can see this, and those who can see, should be waking up those that can’t, and doing everything in their power to organise the resistance.

Tolerance Versus Zero Tolerance

Although apathy and cowardice would be expected to create an all-encompassing tolerance, (anything but ‘a virtue’), in our case it is a highly selective tolerance, for our civilization is not dying of natural old age à la Spengler, but is actually being deliberately killed. Far from being resigned to the twilight and ready for the dark, large sections of our people are actually very angry about what is happening and are bravely and energetically struggling against the fate imposed upon them – witness the Brexit vote in which the white working class saved the day. Many of our people are willing to put up a fight – they just lack enough leaders to effectively organise them and show them how to do so.

Yet our race’s natural leaders, (those who have the intelligence, the wisdom, the education, the experience, the character, the skills, the discipline and, yes, the money), who should be organising some sort of fight-back, are for the most part cowed into doing nothing through either a false sense of self-interest, or through a bourgeoisie sense of respectability. Surely a case of myopia if ever there was one, for as one wag put it ‘good luck in trying to be a respectable middle class white person in Haiti’, which of course is what the white world is fast becoming. To avoid such a fate anyone who has a talent, a skill, an ability or wealth, is duty-bound to use that talent, skill, ability or wealth to aid The Cause. Exactly how he helps is up to him, but help he must.

We must in AK Chesterton’s words ‘‘elect not to be cattle passively awaiting the slaughterman, but warriors infused with a warrior’s purpose and invested with a warrior’s dignity.’’

Not Leaders But Critics

At very best, our so-called leaders refuse to see life on life’s terms, they endlessly criticise from the side lines and complain that the people who should be listening to their advice are not listening, and that the followers who should be following them are not doing so. Many such leaders stamp their feet like petulant toddlers and shrink away to sulk in dark corners, or, in an attempt to blank out the horror and the pangs of conscience, throw themselves into a life of selfish indulgence in the style of ‘apres moi la deluge’. In reality leadership is not easy, it is not lolling in luxury on a throne, but a life of service and self-sacrifice, it is, most importantly, a team effort. A leader without any followers isn’t much of a leader no matter how highly he rates himself or how many books he’s read or how long he’s been in the movement. Leaders without followers, and followers without leaders – truly the division of the generations and the classes was the cleverest thing our enemy ever did.

Selfish Middle Classes

The alien tyranny which is so busy destroying us and which controls what is, and what is not fashionable, has now made it the height of fasion to sit back and smile as our own people are being robbed, abused, corrupted, raped, tortured, enslaved and killed. Many of our pleasure seeking white middle class, infected as they are with liberal sensitivities, have bought into the idea that they can go it alone, that the white middle class can carry on living comfortably amid a sea of brown; that replacing the nasty, bigoted, xenophobic white working class with an ever so more pliant and deferential caste of mud coloured coolies will be a good thing, little realising that all elements of a race have a vital part to play, and that once one section of a race falls away the whole will assuredly fall. Instead of railing against ‘chavs’ and ‘council estate scum’ the middle class should realise that it is their very own abdication of responsibility that has led to the abandonment and degradation of the white working class in the first place. Noblesse oblige – the sense of having a duty to look after all members of your own race – has never been less in vogue than it is now, and designedly so.

The Root of the Problem

The problem that hampers the resistance is not one of strategy nor one of tactics, it is deeper than that, it is a lack of leaders at all levels, both NCO and officer level, and this in turn is due to a deliberate undermining of traditional and aristocratic values, in other words leadership values, and their replacement with an egotistical individualism. Our world has been corrupted, and as the theologians tell us ‘the corruption of the best is the worst.’ Now materialism is our master, finance is our philosophy and gold is our God. With such guides, selfishness, shallow thinking and short-sightedness reign supreme and disaster beckons. Unless. Unless we re-discover that teamwork for which the white race is famed. Unless we re-find that capacity for looking at the world as it really is and planning accordingly. With that in mind let us take a look at Britain today as it really is.

Prime Minister Theresa May – The Jews She’s in Their Pay

Our new Prime Minister Theresa May is shaping up to be a carbon copy of the late Margaret Thatcher – complete with Jewish string pullers, fake patriotism and false sympathy for those Britons concerned about immigration – and as Thatcher stole the National Front vote, May is aiming to steal the Brexit/UKIP vote.

Punished for Patriotism

Let’s take a glimpse at some victims of political correctnesss, those ‘indefensibles’ who certainly aren’t cowards, but who have been reprimanded, with many sent to jail for little more than robustly voicing politically-incorrect views or for simply defending themselves against masked hordes of club wielding communists. Sent to jail often because they couldn’t afford a half decent lawyer. Sent to jail with little or no outrage voiced by our mass media, or even by our fledgling independent media

Punished for Telling a Boy to Man Up and Stop Dressing Like a Fairy

First off is a man who has suffered for merely having some of that oh-so-rare-quality these days – common sense. As reported in today’s, Tuesday 5th October, newspapers a Sainsbury’s supermarket delivery driver is being disciplined by his employer for saying the following to a 4 year old boy who answered the door dressed up bizarrely as pink sparkly fairy: ‘’Someone needs to take you to one side and have a word with you. You can’t be a fairy, you should be a superhero.” Wendy Armitage, the mother who overheard the comments and put in the formal complaint, boasted to journalists that she often encouraged her son to dress up as a nurse and a fairy. In a sane world, as we all know, it would not be the delivery driver who would need punishing.

The Pink Beret Borrower

One sign that things may be changing for the better is the outpouring of sympathy in the press and on TV for Dave Hammer – the plucky anti-EU activist who ‘borrowed’ Eddie Izzard’s beret at a recent ‘Ignore the Brexit result’ march on the 3rd September. In the full glare of TV cameras Hammer was chased by a squad of policemen, who were closely pursued in turn by Izzard in his high heels. Once brought to earth, Hammer was promptly sat on by 6 policemen. Later he was fined £300 and given a criminal record at Westminster Magistrate’s Court for this dastardly act, but received surprisingly favourable coverage from prime time BBC News, who acknowledged the widespread disbelief that this case even made it to court. The BBC ended the news item by saying that ‘the right wing group London Forum was going to pay the fine’, which after a whip round we duly did.

A parallel case on the same day involved the famous former footballer Paul ‘Gazza’ Gascoigne, who was fined £1,000 for cracking a ‘racist’ joke as part of his stand up show; ‘’Its dark in here – can the security guard at the back of the room smile so I can see him’’. The black security guard said he didn’t feel offended at all, but the judge said such insidious racism must be stamped out.

Contrast these two cases with that of the Soros funded ‘Black Lives Matter’ group that breached the security at London City Airport and blocked the runway for half a day on the 6th September causing untold chaos. All nine of them – one a half caste black woman and the rest white, but more probably (((white))) were let off scot free (no criminal record) except for £95 court costs. They said this lenient privilege was due to ‘white privilege’. More likely Jewish privilege, or at least privilege for those pushing the Jewish agenda.

Berger the Dominatrix

Politician Luciana Berger continues to brag that she will bring about the banning of all criticism of ‘establishment politicians’; don’t laugh, the European Union tried something similar recently. (Berger by the way isn’t the sharpest tool in the box, so apart from being Jewish and female, this is probably the only way she can make friends and influence people.) So far she’s had 3 young white men sent to prison for criticising her – Garron Helm, Joshua Bonehill and John Nimmo. Being unable to take criticism is a familiar Jewish characteristic. No doubt she and (((her kind))) would like to send every white voter in the country to the gulag, but no doubt their advisors have suggested that such a move would reflect none too well on ‘democracy’. Her latest attempt is to get Joshua Bonehill’s sentence lengthened for having the temerity online, long before his current sentence began, to call her ‘a dominatrix.’ Apparently, she insists this is an anti-semitic insult. Perhaps it is. You learn something new every day.

Non-establishment and so-called ‘far-right’ politicians, on the contrary, have never and never will receive such molly-coddling protection. UKIP leader of 18 days Diane James has resigned following an incident where she was shouted at and spit at by left-wingers at London’s Waterloo Station – welcome to the real world Diane James! Don’t hold your breath for those responsible to be imprisoned any time soon. The fair weather patriots of UKIP no doubt think that we live in a nice respectable, law-abiding, free country, (except, that is, for a little irritating interference from the EU), rather than under a vicious tyranny that pays and encourages far-left thugs to attack anyone who threatens the anti-white system. I’ll say this, if politicians can’t cope with, or understand reality, if they can’t take the heat, then they should stay out of the kitchen, or rather, in the case of females, get back in it.

A One-to-One Civilized Conversation Can Now be ‘Hate’ and Land You in Prison

One patriot well known in the Nationalist scene for his chatty cockney charm and ‘telling it like it is’ is 50 year-old John Hennigan – a pleasant enough guy, ever helpful, and who always turns up to pay his respects to the fallen on Remembrance Day. He also delights in winding up liberals for he views political correctness as a load of old nonsense and doesn’t care who knows he thinks so. He regards being punished for breaking the sacred liberal shibbboleths as nothing other than a badge of honour. He was recently imprisoned after giving directions to an African woman and her mulatto children in the town centre of Harlow, Essex. All would have been well, but as she was thanking him he said to her matter-of-factly ‘’ I don’t agree with inter-racial relationships. I like natural. I prefer white children.’’ Fair enough. We live in a tolerant age and surely all views should be tolerated? After all, such a viewpoint was the norm everywhere for the whole of recorded history up until the 1970’s. The African woman however promptly reported the comments to the police and the police, (who usually ignore burglaries and crimes of violence), promptly pounced on a perplexed and bemused Mr Hennigan and dragged him off forthwith to the cells. Later in court as Judge Patricia Lynch QC, (who doesn’t look too white under a hard light, if you know what I mean), sentenced him to 18 months imprisonment (eighteen months!!!) for the ‘thoroughly unpleasant offence’ of speaking his mind. A stunned John Hennigan shouted out in reply ‘’I don’t care what you say, I didn’t mean to be unpleasant.’’ The female judge went into hysterics and shouted back at Hennigan that she didn’t care what he thought. He in turn shouted back, a shocked court gawped as a slanging match quickly developed and ended up with judge and Hennigan calling each other ‘cunts’. This is a first in legal history. National headlines ensued. No surprise then to reveal that the female judge will not be imprisoned for her offensive language. Contrast this with the headlines this judge received last year when she refused to jail a pervert paedophile pensioner who had sexually abused two teenage school girls. Why ever we allow females to be judges is beyond me, or it would be if I didn’t realise who was ultimately behind all this ‘madness.’ Sometimes knowing what we do, distressing and horrible as it is, is the only thing that keeps us sane.

“No More Refugees”

There have been a series of ‘No More Refugees’ marches in the major port and channel tunnel town of Dover on England’s south coast. On 30th January 2016 one such march was attacked by a huge mob of balaclava-clad communists, as ever wielding the ubiquitous wooden clubs studded with a nail holding a red pennants in place. Usually the mad Marxists end up throwing stones at the marchers and scuffling with the police, but as there were too few police on the ground that day, insufficient to buffer the two groups, the reds had the alarming prospect of coming face to face not with police, but with tough patriots who annoyingly refused to run away. The Antifa types get confused in such instances as their modus operandi is to gang up and waylay lone right-wingers. What’s more, on this particular day, the good guys defended themselves rather vigorously. But alas, they defended themselves all too vigorously, for the sight of so many communists charging towards them, without any police to spoil the fun, was like a red, (Marxist), rag to a bull, and led to many of them having ‘an Asterix and Obelisk moment’, (‘’Romans! And new ones too!’’), and far too many spoilt rich young University Trotskyists, (many of them Jews), received an unexpected drubbing.

Parents complained to rabbis and rabbis complained to politicians and the politicians complained to the Crown Prosecution Service and pressure was put on the police to analyse film footage of the event, and ever since then, patriots, who by all the evidence behaved with the utmost chivalry during the mayhem, have been arrested, tried and sentenced. And are still being so. One ‘anti-fascist’ organisation, funded by a hedge fund based in a Caribbean tax haven, gloated that most of Britain’s active fascists are now in prison. One chap has been given seven years, (armed robbers get less than that!!). One young woman even got 3 weeks for taking a photograph within the court precincts during the trial of a friend and the friend got an extra 4 weeks added to his sentence for allowing it! It is perhaps superfluous to point out that very few communists have been arrested and even those very few got very light sentences, and this even though they had gone to the town with the expressed intention to attack the legal, lawful march.

One solicitor asked to give his opinion as to why this was so, replied that the authorities were not under any great pressure to arrest and charge the communists, and anyway they did not know who the communists were, because the communists were wearing balaclavas. When pressed as to why the communists were allowed to wear balaclavas, as the wearing balaclavas was illegal at political demonstrations, replied that yes indeed, wearing balaclavas at political demonstrations was illegal, but only if fascists wore them.

As a point of interest a subsequent better stewarded and more heavily policed Dover ‘No more refugees’ march, where the police cleared the route of communists beforehand, passed off without incident.

Joshua Bonehill: Political Prisoner

If one wants an idea of what prison life is like for a politically – incorrect inmate one can’t do better than read the letters of Joshua Bonehill. (ADDRESS BELOW) This young man you may remember was imprisoned at the end of last year for 3 and a half years (42 months) for a series of online memes/graphics and cartoons. On 5th December he is due to face trial at THE most prestigious court in the land, the court reserved for terrorists, serial killers, mass murderers and traitors – The Old Bailey. He’s typically sanguine about it and looking forward to his trial there, “After all”, he says, “not many people get to stand trial at The Old Bailey, and what’s more I get to go there with a clear conscience.” The charges against him are ludicrous, but as they are sub iudice we can’t discuss the precise details here, except to say an online posting, in which he called Berger ‘a dominatrix’, figures prominently.

The mountains of mail he receives has somewhat embarrassed the Prison Service and, as it has been ordered to check and censor every item of his mail, it has also been inconvenienced too. He’s been warned not to write anything politically incorrect, and he’s been told to tell those who write to him to abide by the same rules, all presumably in case certain civil servants assigned to read his letters get offended. The prison authorities, however, rather unhelpfully do not provide a definition of what political correctness actually is. Well, no one really does know do they? Perhaps in an effort to evade responsibility for him and his mail, Prison Governors have been shifting the buck, and he has been doing a grand tour of English prisons. At the current rate he’ll soon be well qualified to write the definitive guide book. He says he prefers the older prisons – more history and heritage and better architecture – to the modern new builds with their soulless, sterile, claustrophobic atmosphere. He has fond memories of lying on his bed reading and gazing at the fine vaulted ceiling in William Joyce’s cell in HMP Wandsworth. He has even spent time at Belmarsh, Britain’s top security prison where the Lee Rigby killers were until recently housed. That jail exists under virtual shariah law due to the large number of Islamic Radicals there. Crucifixes, crosses, and any flags containing crosses such as the St George’s and Union Jack flags are banned with the explanation that they ‘may inflame tensions’ – Joshua even had a small U.S. flag confiscated when it was sent to him – but Islamic flags and symbols abound. At night ‘’you can shut your eyes and with all the Islamic chanting, praying and singing one can think yourself in the Middle East.” Rochester prison, on the other hand, where he is currently based, is run by Gypsy criminal gangs and is the location where the Ray Winstone film ‘Scum’ was shot.

Joshua does a lot of ideological thinking, writing and reading and looks forward to a new springtime for our people. His morale remains high, though his letters, at times, read like Codreanu’s ‘Prison Notebooks’, with their understandable focus on conditions, food and fellow inmates. The conditions are not what one would call salubrious. Overcrowding is a problem and the wardens are understaffed and overstretched. At Wayland Prison in Norfolk, where he recently spent some time, the governor was attacked in the canteen, beaten senseless and has had to have facial reconstructive surgery. Joshua compares prison life to the hierarchy experienced on ship as described by Richard Henry Dana in ‘Two Years before the Mast’, a book sent to him by an anonymous well-wisher. He thanks all those who write to him, he’d also like to express his especial thanks to The D.S. reader who sent him a photocopy of ‘The Oldest Question’. Such correspondence is his lifeblood keeping him mentally sharp and his resultant cheerfulness has earned him the respect of the professional lags. He writes that he enjoys his prison job of training inmates oh how to produce camouflage nets for the British Army.

Whatever the outcome of his Old Bailey trial in December, he will still have time left of his current sentence to serve and so will be spending this Christmas behind bars. He sums up by saying that prison makes one realise that possessions are nothing and that “a man’s true wealth is his ideals and his beliefs.” Writing to a political prisoner makes one realise this too. It ensures you get your priorities right. It is time our race got its priorities right.

No Time for Cowardice

For this struggle in which we are involved is akin to The Battle of Blood River, it is like Rorke’s Drift. Our enemy is thirsting for our blood and they have no word in their language for mercy. If we lose, we lose all, and all of us lose all – no matter how wealthy or secure we individually feel ourselves now to be. This is no time for factionalism or endless arguments. It is time for teamwork. No time for holding back. It is time to give it all we’ve got in whatever way we can. Its ‘do or die’. This is no time for cowardice. Its time to shoot Zulus.

You can write to Joshua at:

Joshua Bonehill
A5933DM
HMP Rochester
1 Fort Road
Rochester
Kent
ME1 3QS
ENGLAND

Please note: this is Joshua’s current prison address, any mail sent to other prisons will eventually catch up with him. Second-hand books are not accepted by some prisons. Stamps and postal orders are gratefully received, please write in the letter that you have sent this and to what amount.

It is planned to provide a comprehensive listing of the addresses of all political prisoners who so wish their details to be listed.

The Dover marches prisoners’ aid scheme is run by Mandy and can be contacted via The South East Alliance facebook page.

Forthcoming Events

Employment Rights for Whites
Various speakers
Royal Holloway College,
Egham, Surrey
Saturday 22nd October

White Lives Matter
Various speakers
Margate, Kent
Saturday 22nd October

South West Forum, Bristol area
Speakers include Richard Edmonds, Max Musson & Jez Turner
29th October

Yorkshire Forum
Saturday 26th November
Speakers to include the Occidental Observer’s Andrew Joyce.

For details of any or all of these events please contact: londonforum@yahoo.co.uk

An alleged antisemite faces trial in December accused of racially harassing a Jewish Labour MP.

Joshua Bonehill-Payne, 23, is said to have posted five abusive articles attacking Luciana Berger. He is charged with racially aggravated harassment relating to material that is said to have appeared on his websites between October 2014 and January 2015.

Titles of the articles included ‘Racist anti-white Jewish Labour MP Luciana Berger exposed’, ‘Is the Labour party a Jewish party’ and ‘The Legacy of Operation Filthy Jew Bitch’. The charge states that he ‘demonstrated towards Luciana Berger hostility based on her membership or perceived membership of a particular racial group, namely Jews’.

Bonehill-Payne appeared by videolink at the Old Bailey today from Wayland prison wearing a red T-shirt. He was unrepresented during the brief hearing and did not enter a plea to a single charge of racially aggravated harassment of Luciana Berger between 26 October 2014 and 25 January 2015.

Source

Joshua Bonehill organised a protest against the “myth” of Jewish privilege. He was then banned from London and sent to prison for 3 years. Now he faces being charged again.

Note the charge of demonstrating hostility to someone based on their membership or perceived membership of a particular racial group. In practice this means that aliens are allowed to target Europeans for hostile stereotyping and political action but if Europeans merely point out that they are doing this, it is a crime. We are living in a state of tyranny in which Europeans are required by law to unilateral disarmament in the ethno-war, while all non-Europeans are allowed and encouraged to engage in ethnic self-assertion against them.

Jez Turner
Daily Stormer
July 11, 2016

‘That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.’ – Nietzsche

The Legacy of The Nuremberg Trials

Herman Goering at history’s most infamous kangaroo court

It is seventy years since the Nuremberg Trials took place and to commemorate this the historian David Irving is giving a lecture tour of Britain on the subject. Seventy years since the Nuremberg Trials overturned every tradition and legal precedent, overthrew all common sense and upturned the ancient European sense of right and wrong. Seventy years since the reign of Victor’s Justice began and the defeated have been unjustly punished ever since. Yet the true Victors of the Second World War were not the Americans, not the Russians, not the British, nor the French, no, the only victors of the Second World War were … surprise, surprise … the Jews. The Nuremberg Trials were (((their))) doing, it is (((their))) ideal of pliable justice, to suit the need and whim of the moment, (((their))) need and (((their))) whim, and it ushered in a rule of politically correct ‘law’, wherein, bizarrely, ‘’The Truth is no defence’’, and under which we all still suffer and will continue to suffer until we are finally genocided out of existence. For that is the only punishment that will satisfy the Victors of the Second World War because, and make no mistake about it, those who lost the Second World War, as the Jews clearly realised at the time, were not just the defeated Axis powers, but white people everywhere.

The Martyr

Joshua Bonehill, defender of the British people

Joshua Bonehill had a preliminary hearing Tuesday last at Westminster Magistrates Court, and he is now due to appear at the Old Bailey to face trial proper over the five articles he wrote on the subject of Member of Parliament Luciana Berger and her persecution of British patriot Garron Helm. Helm was given a one month sentence over a year ago after she demanded that he be prosecuted for a rather innocuous Charlie Hebdo-style cartoon of the female MP showing her wearing a yellow Star of David with the caption ‘’You can always count on a Jew to show their true colours eventually’’. The prison sentence unsurprisingly has not made Garron Helm any better disposed towards Jews.

One sentence written on the internet result in a one month sentence in jail.

The articles that Joshua Bonehill wrote and posted on the web concerning this issue – a combination of articles, memes and Charlie Hebdo-style cartoons – were written long before his trial last year for internet postings and should have been included in the charges he faced then… but were not. If Joshua were a left-winger, or a liberal, or a Jew then the prisoners’ of conscience charity (((Amnesty International))) would be all over his case like a tramp on chips offering help, advice and campaigning for his immediate release. They trumpet to all and sundry, (do they not?), that they exist to defend all those who are persecuted or imprisoned for voicing their non-violent political opinions WHATEVER their political opinions may be. However, when asked by Lady Michele Renouf if they were planning or willing to campaign on behalf of David Irving the British historian who at the time had just been imprisoned in Vienna for telling the historical truth about World War II, they replied with the now immortal words ‘’We only defend humans.’’ So don’t hold your breath – ‘whatever their political opinions may be’ only applies to Jews or those who push the Jewish Agenda so we shan’t be expecting any help from that source any time soon.

David Irving is the only historian to ever be called an “extremist.”

Quite why Joshua Bonehill is to have his trial at the Old Bailey – the highest criminal court in the land – is anyone’s guess, but no doubt politically-incorrect humour is now considered as being just as serious as armed bank robbery or even murder, and such a wicked and troublesome thought-criminal as Joshua to be slightly more dangerous than a serial killer. Let us bear in mind that his original trial for producing some online cartoons that were tame compared to Charlie Hebdo, and that resulted in a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence which took place at the lowly Southwark Crown Court. Let us also remember that the public prosecutors were quite aware of all his online postings at that time and should have prosecuted him for them all then. We await developments with interest, but we do not expect anything like a fair trial and at present it looks as if Joshua Bonehill could well break the record for the longest prison sentence ever handed down in Britain for politically-incorrect thought-crimes.

The Joker

Gazza Gascoigne is another racist threat to the British social order.

Descending now into farce, after months of deliberation the Crown Prosecution Service has now decided to prosecute the extremely popular ex-England soccer player Paul ‘Gazza’ Gascoigne for the heinous crime of, wait for it, cracking a joke during a show he gave in the town of Wolverhampton, where he said he couldn’t tell whether the black security guard at the back of the darkened auditorium was enjoying himself or not, because he couldn’t see his face.

Such chutzpah on the part of our (((secret rulers))) while not pleasant for those being persecuted, induces disbelief, then laughter, then anger among anyone who still possesses a sense of proportion and is probably the best thing that can happen for our movement, because it drives people, the best people, into our fold. A case, one might say, of (((them))) boiling the frog too quickly.

The Nazi Pug Dog

Police have stressed the dire need to address dog Nazism.

And there are signs that this awakening is already beginning. The howls of incredulity that greeted the arrest and cautioning of a Scots man, Michael Meecham,who taught his girlfriend’s dog to ‘Sieg Heil’ and other such doggy tricks, is perhaps a foretaste of things to come. The man filmed the dog’s performance and put the results on Youtube, where the video went viral achieving at last count almost two million hits, with comments being overwhelmingly positive. To cap it all his look of absolute glee, (the man not the dog), on being arrested by plain clothes police who clearly struggled to keep their faces straight will perhaps be seen as the turning point.

Simon Sheppard

In 2008, Simon Sheppard (right) learned that Holocaust jokes are no joking matter.

I say this because two years ago, political dissident, psychologist, and author Simon Sheppard had his house in Yorkshire raided by the Thought Police and the case has just come to court. The Thought Police has many names but is to all intents and purposes the political arm of the British Police and it is made up of those who haven’t got the guts or anything else it takes to deal with real crime. They are usually police officers who shouldn’t really be in the police at all, but get taken on in order to meet the affirmative action quotas and then quickly promoted into this department so they don’t get in the way of the real work – you get the picture; lesbians, feminists, homosexuals, ethnics all commanded by Jews. (Think SJWs in uniform.) Islamic Radicalism is not on their radar, but political incorrectness by red-blooded white men most definitely is.

The Yorkshire Thought Police is very much under the thumb of the Leeds area Jews who constantly fear another Clifford’s Tower, (an incident in the Middle Ages when the York peasants led by Richard Malebisse rioted against Jewish usurers, and the Jews rather than face the fury of the mob took refuge in Clifford’s Tower and then committed mass suicide). They therefore fill their days harassing any potential thought-criminal they can locate. When bored, they used to raid the home of the elderly Colin Jordan (NSM, BM and editor of Gothic Ripples), who retired to the area, but as he has now gone to Valhalla, they have decided to turn their attention to Simon Sheppard, who is something of a legend among British Nationalists.

Why is he such a hero? Well he rose to fame in 2007/2008 when he and a colleague Stephen Whittle, known as ‘The Heretical Two’ were prosecuted for uploading the Tales of the Holohoax comic book from a computer in Britain up onto an American website. Although the comic had been distributed without problem in England for 20 years previously by the Historical Review Press, posting it online had resulted in far more exposure to its subversive content and (((the powers that be))) decided to stamp it out. (It can be viewed on the Heretical.us website.) Although no American law had been broken, the fact that Stephen Whittle and Simon Sheppard had uploaded it from Britain was deemed enough (((by the powers that should not be))) for them to face a lengthy jail sentence. They both immediately skipped bail, flew to the USA, via Eire, and requested political asylum.

And what do you think the decision of the Government of the land of the free, the home of the brave, the Government of “Come send us all your huddled masses, your poor, your persecuted, your refugees’’ was? Exactly. They were both thrown into detention for a year as potential terrorists and then extradited back to Britain where they were given lengthy prison sentences – Simon Sheppard getting 4 years 10 months, (reduced to 3 years and 10 months on appeal), with the year in the US jail not counting as part of the sentence. If you’ve never heard of any of this it is not surprising, because (((those who control the mass media))) instituted a conspiracy of silence on the issue so severe that even the British National Party was afraid to touch the issue. On their release ‘the Heretical Two’ were feted as heroes by British Nationalists and the cheerful Simon Sheppard in particular has engaged in a hectic round of speaking engagements, writing and publishing.

So, being well known to the SJWs in uniform, so it was that he was raided two years ago as part of a trawling raid, where the police on orders from (((above))) took computers and every data device, but ignored a dozen copies of Lincoln Rockwell’s ever-popular cartoon book The Fable of the Ducks and the Hens. Presumably because charging him with ‘anti-hennism’ would be a step too far, even for them. (Read the comic book if you haven’t already, its about the ducks and (((the hens))), so breaks no law – Rockwell was Odyssean in his cunning.) He was arrested and later released, and no charges were brought. Move on two years to 2nd June 2016, and we saw the judge at York County Court saying that the decision to raid Simon Sheppard’s house was ‘’operationally flawed’’, the raid followed ‘’a decision that ought not to have been made’’ and that he was falsely arrested, falsely imprisoned and that although Mr Sheppard was a man with extreme views, he nevertheless is entitled to the protection of the law against the abuse of (((the State))). Boy oh boy, is this judge going to be in (((their))) bad books!

Furthermore he Judge awarded Simon Sheppard £8,700 in damages plus full legal costs! (This judge will be in (((their))) VERY bad books!) So you see, (((they))) don’t always get it their own way, people are waking up and realising what’s afoot. And what may you ask, is Simon Sheppard going to do with this £8,700 windfall? Well he’s already done it, he’s not one to sit on his laurels – he’s promptly had 10,000 copies of George Lincoln Rockwell’s Fable of the Ducks and the Hens printed off and is having them distributed to houses around York! As I write this three and a half thousand have been distributed so far, with six and a half thousand still to go! This is the sort of spirit we need. It doesn’t really get better than this. Until it does. And it will. For whites everywhere are waking up to the truth and in turn are passing on the truth. Seventy years has been long enough.

‘’The Truth can wait, for it lives a long time’’ – Schopenhauer

Links

David Irving’s lecture tour on The Nuremberg Trials

https://irvingbooks.com/xcart/home.php?cat=250

David Irving Nuremberg: The last battle

http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Nuremberg/NUREMBERG.pdf

Joshua Bonehill to appear at The Old Bailey

http://www.somersetlive.co.uk/yeovil-man-joshua-bonehill-paine-appears-in-court-over-alleged-harassment-of-labour-mp/story-29482081-detail/story.html

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/160050/joshua-bonehill-paine-appears-court-face-charges-harassing-luciana-bergerAmnesty

International Charity is Jewish

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Amnesty_International

Garron Helm and Luciana Berger MP

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2800945/nazi-sympathiser-jailed-four-weeks-grossly-offensive-anti-semitic-tweet-sent-labour-mp.html

http://national-action.info/2014/11/27/an-interview-with-garron-helm/

Popular ex England footballer to face court trial for ‘racist’ joke

http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/06/29/gazza-racist-joke-paul-gascoigne-to-appear-in-dudley-court-today/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-36660852

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/paul-gascoigne-to-face-trial-after-denying-raciallyaggravated-public-order-offence-a3284016.html

Nazi Pug Dog video has nearly 2 million hits

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3549568/Prankster-posted-video-pug-giving-Nazi-salute-responding-racist-slogans.html

Colin Jordan

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Colin_Jordan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EdcyNPrhR4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGi_wIWRYys

The Saga of ‘The Heretical Two’

http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2011/jsummary.html

Clifford’s Tower, York, 1190 AD

http://www.historyofyork.org.uk/themes/norman/the-1190-massacre

The Fable of the Ducks & Hens

http://www.heretical.com/pubs/fabledh.html

Books by Simon Sheppard

Anna Frank’s Novel (1998)

All About Women (2nd ed. 2015, 1st ed. 1998)

The Tyranny of Ambiguity (2nd ed. 2013, 1st ed. 2002)

Sex & Power: A Manual on Male-Female Relations (2013)

More writings and work by Simon Sheppard can be found at:

http://heretical.com/

http://www.faem.com/

http://www.revisionist.net/

http://www.searchlight.org.uk/

http://www.spearhead.co.uk/

In the EKP interview, you mention a “shadowy elite bent on our destruction.” In reading it, I definitely had the impression that you were referring a predominantly Jewish elite, or at least an elite that is substantially Jewish to the point that elite attitudes and policies would have to comport to the interests and attitudes of its Jewish component.

For example, you stated that “The west is controlled by Leftists that can trace their roots back to former Soviet eastern bloc nations-men like Yossel Slovo [longtime leader of the South African Communist Party], Ed Miliband etc.”  Ed Miliband’s father is Marxist sociologist Ralph Miliband; you stated that “Ralph Miliband emigrated to Britain and did his utmost to destroy his host nation.” You also mention Dan Glass, Eleanor Margolis, Nadine Gordimer (an anti-apartheid activist who received the Nobel Prize for Literature), Barbara Lerner Specter, and Emily Thornberry. Of these 8 names, only one — Emily Thornberry — is or was not Jewish, and it is well-known that the great majority of UK Jews descend from those who, like Ralph Miliband, immigrated from Eastern Europe.

This would seem to be suggest that you think that Jews have a major role to play in this shadowy elite. We at TOO have claimed that Jews are a necessary (but not a sufficient) condition for the current onslaught of immigration and multiculturalism in the US. Am I correct in my impression that you think Jews are a necessary condition for the current program of destruction against the traditional people and culture of the UK?

Certainly. There’s no denying that Jewish radicals are the progenitors of the vast majority of the intellectual and social movements undermining Western culture — from Marxism, the feminism ruining our families, homosexual advancement, and often counterproductive civil rights causes. Most honest people with a proper understanding of history recognize that Jews were and are at the forefront of these movements. Didn’t Barbara Spectre herself admit as much? [Ed.: Yes]

I was certainly quite clear that I thought as much in the interview.

But I was just in the middle of a campaign, caught up in the heat of a moment with a very intense interviewer who wanted me to pin all our society’s ills on Jews. Although I agreed with him on most issues, about halfway through the chat I realised that if I as much as sneezed the word Jew — even if i had the evidence to back up my point, my career in UKIP would be over at that moment.

In fact, it was my referencing Berger’s loyalty to Israel, and not my claims that there was concrete effort to eradicate White South Africans, that would ultimately sound the death knell of my campaign. I felt guilty that I couldn’t go any farther, but also thought the interviewer recognised that I was being quite clear, especially knowing the sort of audience the EKP website has.

But certainly I just personally couldn’t take that chance so I decided to leave it out of the interview.

Do I regret it?

Yes and no. If I’d been suspended then I would not have been on the ballot. Procuring more than 6000 votes (above the national UKIP average), a 10% increase from UKIP West Lancashire’s last showing, as a suspended candidate no less, was no small feat and something I am quite proud of.

Still, in some respects, I do, as I compromised my principles by biting my tongue.

I would have loved to have stated that the radical movements discussed — those designed with the intention of subverting Western nations, were mechanisms used to advance Jewish group interests. I just couldn’t at the time. I’m glad I have the opportunity to do so now.

One thing I do regret however, is putting my family through all of this — something you and I discussed during an earlier conversation.

We have been the recipients of numerous threats that the media and my own party have turned a blind eye to. Apparently alleged anti-Semitic tweets are a far bigger issue than the literally dozens of letters, threats and instances of serious abuse I’ve received.

And it’s only gotten worse since the mass media jumped on me and UKIP threw me under a bus publicly.

Just last week some clown — probably a paid Labour supporter, felt compelled to post my leaflet back to my local chairman. He drew a Hitler moustache on my face, popped an SS cap on my head, and scrawled the names of Reich SS officers below my council candidates. Himmler and Goebbels apparently had been reincarnated in West Lancashire. (I asked the police if I could keep the flattering artwork as a memento but they refused)

Before that I received a dozen or so death threats in the post from an organization calling themselves Stand up to UKIP.

Just prior to the election I attended a scheduled street surgery where I was confronted by a Labour party activist that shouted “anti-Semite” and “Nazi“ at me so I couldn’t speak.

On another occasion I was confronted by a group of Labour thugs in town. I was with my wife and daughter and literally menaced to a point where I thought the confrontation might get physical. My family was quite shaken up and it left me wondering if it was all worth it. But then someone has to take a stand.

My Nordic wife, English mother, and most importantly my 100% phenotypically white daughter, need someone to represent their interests and protect their wellbeing, and I have felt for some time now that I should be that person. That’s what dads and real men do.

Sadly, as I’m certain you’ve recognised, the vast majority of White Western men inhabiting Northern Europe and North America are quite apathetic — one can say they’ve been emasculated beyond belief by Cultural Marxism, evidenced by the tens of thousands of grooming gang rapes and not one instance of revenge.

After what transpired in Rotherham, where White children were singled out for rape, and the White Leftist establishment and their dads did nothing to prevent it, I felt I needed to take a stand, not against the perpetrators of the rape, but the Leftist fiends facilitating it.

Even if I am one of the few men in Britain willing to sacrifice his career to do so, I’ve done my part and I can certainly sleep at night. I am sure you know firsthand what it feels like to be bullied and silenced because of your beliefs, and recognise the importance of speaking out and doing what’s right for your family and country.

And I would like to add that the British gentile elite don’t deserve a free pass either. Without people like Tony Blair who spent decades undermining our national sovereignty, activists like Emily Thornberry and White social service workers that facilitate rape on a daily basis, even men like Farage that authorise the suspension of candidates who fight back, and usefully idiotic White English liberals championing the issues that do us the most harm, we’d be fine. We Westerners on many levels are our own worst enemy.

What won’t we do for a quick buck and a warped ideology we believe in.

In the EKP interview, you mention Hollywood movies that deal with the Holocaust and with slavery in the American South. You characterize such movies as “propaganda” and note that certain atrocities, such as the mass murders carried out by the Soviet government, are studiously avoided by Hollywood. You don’t mention a Jewish connection here, but Jewish influence and the prominent of themes favored by the organized Jewish community in the U.S. have often been discussed on The Occidental Observer. Do you believe that Jews and Jewish interests are overrepresented in the U.K. media?

Certainly. The elite use film, the media and academia to undermine indigenous culture. Nationalism, patriotism, even love of country is often perceived as a threat and to be attacked. Historical events that may or not have even taken place, are exploited in order to further tribal gains.

In the US, an annual stream of Slavery horror films in which the Black man is abused to such an extent his descendants still feel his pain, is being used to incite hatred and breed the animosity that currently exists between Blacks and Whites.

Most poor black people couldn’t care less what happened last week, why would they worry about something that happened to their ancestors hundreds of years earlier?

They only do because are they are being indoctrinated into hatred.

Sounds a bit conspiratorial but one need only look at how many films are released annually about slavery, the Holocaust, the Black civil rights movements, injustices perpetrated against women and other ‘minorities’. Is there any wonder Americans are at one another’s throats?

Over the next few years I expect Hollywood will do its best to whip your LGBT population into a hate-filled frenzy, as well. A few more films about Matthew Shepard will do the trick.

The British media is not immune from Jewish influence either.  It might not be as conspicuous as it is in the US, where Jews control almost every facet of popular culture, but it is quite bad.

The current director of television at the BBC-the person responsible for deciding what we watch, is a man by the name of Danny Cohen. Prior to his appointment as Director he ran Britain’s Channel 4 (Britain’s second biggest private station), then BBC One-our largest station.

Cohen, like many high ranking Jews attended a Jewish primary school, and was active in organisations pursuing Jewish interests. To think his background has no impact on his decisions is mad.

And Danny, is not an anomaly. Jews are overrepresented across our media, as top newsreaders and media personalities, singers and songwriters, actors and culture creators. Guest pundits are often Jewish and names like Margolis saturate our print and news media. Again, pointing this out is not anti-Semitic or racist. Many of these people are more English looking than I am. This is just about elucidating the truth.

Although we are not as hung up on the Holocaust in this country as you are in the US, we are certainly saturated with pro-Jewish messages on TV and in film. There’s no getting away from that.

My Cockney grandfather used to tell me-while the Englishman was acquiring and buying up all the land, the Jews were doingbuying up the world’s newspapers.

Nothing’s changed.

At TOO we have often disputed the idea that Jewish identities are irrelevant to political behavior and have made the point that Jewish leftists often retain a strong Jewish identity and pursue what they see as Jewish interests. Do you think that the Jewish identity of politicians like Luciana Berger and Ed Miliband influences how they would act on issues related to immigration, muliticulturalism, free speech, and Israel — issues where the organized Jewish groups like the Board of Deputies have strong opinions?

Undoubtedly. Men like Grant Shapps-former Conservative Party chairman and current Minister of State at the Department for International Developments, are constantly pushing for us to escalate hostilities with Iran, while lasses like Luciana Berger- are often involved in, or chair Jewish think tanks, lobbying firms and organisations with explicitly Jewish interests, all while supposedly representing Britain’s interests in Westminster.

Prior to being parachuted into Wavertree, Liverpool from one of the wealthiest areas of West London, Berger was President of Labour friends of Israel where she lobbied our government to send money overseas for three years. She only stepped down once she was gifted the safe Labour seat by Labour leadership.

Berger is in fact so obsessed with exposing anti-Semitism, she claims she sees it around ever corner. She’s more well known for feigning moral outrage and subsequently demanding anyone that criticises Jews be imprisoned for exercising their freedom of speech, as she did in my case, than serving her constituency-which was the point I was trying to make in those Tweets.

Berger’s had several local lads physically locked up over what amounts to the sort of online trolling hot heads get up to when they’ve nothing better to do, has petitioned American twitter to ban people and block terms that she deems offensive to Jews, among a variety of other examples of behaviour that clearly demonstrate her fixation and the allegiance I referenced.

And this is not some newfound cause she’s just started championing.

While serving as a National Executive Committee (NEC) member of Britain’s National Student Union she was in a very public row with her fellow Leftist committee comrades over their perceived anti-Semitism. She ultimately resigned from the board, publicly accusing other NEC members of hatred.

So it’s not like I criticised her without good cause, nor is it that outrageous to draw the conclusion she has divided loyalties-even a foreign one considering her track record.

Regarding Miliband. Although I harbour nothing but contempt for the man, Ed Miliband-the most high profile Jewish politician in Britain, is probably the least hawkish British politician of Jewish origin when it comes to foreign policy and supporting Israel. He has been condemned by many Jews for his voting record and apparent support of a two state solution. Miliband did in fact vote to push the British government to recognize the Palestinian state in a House of Commons vote last year.

Let’s just say a lot of his Jewish backers were none too amused. My guess is Luciana Berger called a hotline or two as well.

Jack Sen ran for a seat in Parliament representing West Lancashire. Until less than a week before the election, he was running under the banner of UKIP, but he was suspended from UKIP for an interview he gave a South African organization, the European Knights Project, posted on April 12, and for tweets received by Luciana Berger, a Jewish woman who is a Labour MP.  He has kindly agreed to respond to written questions. 

****

UKIP is obviously struggling to not be seen as “racist” in order to be acceptable to the establishment and to White voters who fear and loathe multicultural UK but are unwilling to vote for a party labeled “racist” in the media. Is there a disconnect between White voters likely to vote for UKIP and the UKIP leadership?

Firstly, I’d like to sincerely thank you for giving me an opportunity to speak to your audience. You do very important work.

There is definitely an enormous disconnect between people on the ground — parliamentary candidates like myself and unpaid volunteers that support us with our campaigns — and the people running the party.

There’s no denying that the vast majority of the noble people supporting our efforts are salt of the earth, red blooded Englishmen that want real change and to see a return to the Britain we all knew and loved. That’s evident from the sorts of conversations I’ve had at local meetings and convention dinners. The average UKIP supporter recognises the catastrophic damage Cultural Marxism has had on our homeland and supports us — even offers up his time and money — in the hope we (UKIP) can make a difference. They might not recognise the Jewish element to Cultural Marxism, however they certainly recognise the impact liberalism has had on our society. From the intentional breakdown of the traditional family, to the pushing of alternative lifestyle choices on our youth, Leftists like Ed Miliband have reshaped British society from the council estates to the countryside.

Much like the Labour Party, UKIP relies upon societal discord to peddle its policies and candidates. Although people on the ground, with a genuine love of country, are buying into the ‘Take Back Britain’ message UKIP is peddling, I am not convinced the people running the party care one bit about this country.

If UKIP were to come to power, they’d push a domestic agenda similar to Margaret Thatcher’s, highlighted by deregulation, privatisation, crony capitalism, and the implementation of policies that for all intents and purposes prey upon the disenfranchised, albeit nostalgically portrayed working man. I recognized that quite early on and it’s part of why I started to have issues with the party.

UKIP’s intentions to privatize the National Health Service, frack our beloved English countryside, sell us out to their cronies in the City (equivalent of Wall Street), cut taxes for the wealthiest Britons, kill ‘mansion’ and inheritance taxes while reducing public sector expenditure, never sat right with me. This is even before I recognised how cosy with Jewish organisations UKIP were.

I suppose a fair comparison would be to your Republican party, who appeal to working class Whites to get elected but systematically oppose their interests once in office.

I merely think of Ted Cruz — a man that I believe is being groomed to be the Republican Party’s presidential candidate by Jewish special interest groups. This is the sort of scoundrel that would do well in UKIP. His slightly ethnic face, nationalistic façade, and, most of all, his big business pedigree would propel him to the top in my party was well.

Where the Republican party and UKIP differ is on foreign policy. There is certainly a perversion of patriotism and true ethno-nationalist sentiment in both parties, but UKIP still has a more isolationist foreign policy than your Republican party, which appears to rely on Jingoism and the demonisation of the Islamic world to push its Zionist agenda. From what I know about American politics, and how Jewish special interest groups have infiltrated a Republican Party once highly distrusting of Jews, I’m concerned that it won’t be long until we see the same sort of agenda in UKIP. Someone like Paul Nuttall — UKIP’s second in command — would sell his soul for much less than what the Zionist lobby handed the Reagan Administration.

With Jewish-owned newspapers like the Daily Express already cosying up to UKIP, I think it is only a matter of time before we see the same sort of impact this side of the pond as well.

There are many White voters who fear and loathe multiculturalism because they realize that these policies are against their interest. They are afraid to explicitly identify as a White person who has interests as a White person because of media pressure and other types of social pressure, such as loss of job. We call such people implicitly, but not explicitly, White. Do you think it’s fair that Jews, Muslims, and other minorities are free to organize and attempt to explicitly advocate their interests while explicit mentions of the interests of the traditional people of the UK are banned from the mainstream media?

Not only is it unfair that indigenous English people can not fight for their interests; I say English as it’s become perfectly acceptable for Scots to fight for theirs north of the border, it’s downright destructive.

I recall the former leader of the British National Party (BNP), Nick Griffin, being invited on BBC’s Question Time simply so the Leftist audience and the program’s Leftist and non-white pundits could have a go at him. During the hour-long program, Griffin referred to the indigenous English population’s interests. As soon as he uttered the term indigenous the audience attacked.

Griffin asked the predominantly White pathologically liberal audience why they didn’t think that White English people should have their rights protected and interests served, and what was wrong with referring to English people like my mother, as indigenous. He was heckled, shouted down and made to feel truly unwelcome. It was quite upsetting to be honest with you.

The shouts of racism and anti-Semitism from the predominantly White upper-middle-class audience, were quite alarming. His suggestion that it was unfair that there were no organisations representing indigenous English interests was met with extreme hostility, in spite of the fact that he was right. Although I don’t agree with all of Griffin’s views, I certainly feel that the indigenous population that have inhabited the British Isles for thousands of years are being sold out, need a voice and their rights protected.

Sadly, UKIP, regardless of what we’d like to believe, does not offer that voice. In fact it is also why UKIP explicitly bans any contact with the BNP and any other ‘nationalist groups’.

When you enter the party you have to state for the record that you’ve never been a member of the BNP. You are then grilled quite hard about your past political involvement when you go for your parliamentary candidate assessment. Prospective members of Parliament like myself would be immediately banned from the party if it was discovered we attended BNP meetings in our youth.

Although UKIP claims that this is due to the stigma attached to the BNP I am not convinced. I personally don’t think UKIP cares about ethnic interests. From the sorts of chaps I see at the events and drivel emanating form their mouths, it’s quite apparent that UKIP’s agenda starts and ends with big business.

Politicians must necessarily be concerned about winning elections, not necessarily saying what they really think. A recent survey found that 25% of British adults would like all immigrants repatriated.  Do you believe that even though UKIP leaders have moderated their tone on many issues (e.g., advocating a points-based immigration system rather than one that explicitly favors the interests of the traditional people of the UK), that their true opinions are more radical and that in power they would in fact attempt to put into place policies that would favor the interests of the traditional people of the UK?

People on the ground are certainly quite hard line on immigration. It is in fact the reason why UKIP has seen such a massive increase in popularity. In my constituency, and in the north of England generally, there are areas that are 100% Muslim, others that are predominantly Polish, and the average Brit feels marginalised and a stranger in his homeland.

A few months back, one of my constituents in fact walked into a housing estate that had been taken over by immigrants from an Eastern bloc nation and literally started hacking random strangers with a katana sword. His reason? He was tired of seeing foreign flags hanging out the windows of the former English estate, and listening to people shouting in a foreign tongue in town. Those were in fact the reasons he gave the magistrate if I recall correctly.

And it’s far worse in areas where Muslims have taken over. Islamic immigrants from the Middle East and Pakistan have no desire whatsoever to assimilate, and have all but teamed up with the Labour party to destroy Britain from within. Many of my supporters are cognisant of the fact that I am staunchly anti-mass immigration and have pledged their support for my candidacy due to my hardline approach.

Although I would say that the average UKIP supporter would love to see unruly, ungrateful, and unassimilable members of our immigrant population repatriated, the same can not be said for party leaders I’ve had conversations with. In fact I regularly received complaints from HQ that my local UKIP West Lancs website was too focused on immigration and critical of foreign-born people. I was even accused of anti-Semitism from a prospective member of Parliament because I dared ask if we’d be permitted to live in Israel or Saudi Arabia if we chose not to abide by their nation’s laws. Quite remarkably I was asked to remove ‘Israel’ from that sentence as it was ‘anti-Semitic’. Although at the time I thought nothing of the exchange, I now realise it was a sign of what would ultimately define my candidacy.

With that said, UKIP is still more critical of our immigrant newcomers than all the other political parties; just for the wrong reasons.

I recently wrote an article arguing that in some parts of the U.S. it would be a good tactic for a candidate to be explicit about White interests. Do you think that might be possible now or in the near future in the UK? That is, could a candidate talk explicitly about the costs and dangers to White Britain and still be elected in certain districts?

Although it certainly seems logical, that’s not on the cards at the moment in this country. One need only look at the fall of the BNP to know that although some elements of Britain’s population do think in this manner, English law all but prohibits race-based discussions taking place on a political level — unless you’re a minority, of course. The BNP, the sort of party that would advocate repatriation, was literally wiped out at the polls, receiving a measly 1,667 votes in all 650 constituencies at the general election. That was down 99.7% from 2010.

Unlike in the US, where you are protected by free speech laws, we simply aren’t allowed to express our opinions freely. Critising Jews for example can literally get you locked up. In your country the Ku Klux Klan and Black Panther Party are permitted to stand on the street corner and canvass with messages based purely on racial animus. Although people are persecuted for criticising Jewry, you’re still legally allowed to do so under your First Amendment protections. In Britain, making an off-colour Facebook post with the word Jew in it might land you in prison. In fact a few years ago some local agitators decided to have a go at Liverpool Labour MP, Luciana Berger, and she had them locked up for what amounted to a little ‘trolling’.

In Britain, we aren’t allowed to criticise people based on race, even if it’s in a genteel manner and for the common good.

Besides, most of our society has been reprogrammed to such an extent we would rather allow our daughters to be raped by Muslim grooming gangs, our sons beaten to death by groups of Black ‘youths’ menacing our inner cities than be perceived as being racist. The fear of being branded homophobic is even more intense.

Jewish media influence at home and in Hollywood, and the Leftist educators behind the indoctrination of our children, are behind this madness.

To be perfectly honest, we Brits are almost pathologically politically correct. Not to the extent a nation like Sweden is, but nevertheless we are quite useless when it comes to discussing the importance of race as a determinant of anything.

To answer your question, there is a segment of the population that would certainly support policies that promote indigenous English interests, but based on the decline in numbers the BNP have see this past decade, I’m not so sure people are ready for it just yet.

They might talk about wanting the country back, but supporting a party that discusses race would be a bit much for most people to support openly.

Relevant to the last point, I am very happy that you are continuing your election campaign despite being suspended from the party. Do you think that voters in your district will be put off by the controversy surrounding you? Will you lose votes or gain votes? Can you tell our audience a little more about the incident that resulted in your suspension?

Thanks for your kind words Kevin. I never entertained the idea of dropping out of the election even after my suspension. Although I immediately recognised that my campaign had been ruined and UKIP wanted me out, I was not about to allow a vile woman like Luciana Berger, who has ruined a lot of lives over the years, do me in.

I was lucky in the fact that it was after nominations were closed and UKIP were unable to remove me from the ballot. Although I wasn’t 100% certain at the time I’d still be on the ballot, I knew if I was, I’d press on.

Regarding the reason for my suspension: I was removed for insinuating on Twitter that a local Labour MP Lucy Berger of Jewish origin had dual loyalties between England and Israel, and because I dared to address the genocide of Western European people in the Old and New Worlds. I was also informed that an interview I gave the European Knights Project, where I hinted at the Jewish nature of Marxism and other destructive anti-Western movements, had something to do with their decision.

Although the Tweets were relatively innocuous, within minutes of the story breaking, UKIP suspended me. The story took on a life of its own, and within an hour or so my name was on every news channel in Britain. My mother rang me hysterically from more than 400 miles away informing me that news of my ‘anti-Semitism’ and subsequent suspension had been on the BBC ticker, and I was out the party and election. I myself only found out when a BBC reporter rang me, as my own party didn’t have the decency to ring me. (They still haven’t.)

Nigel Farage even took time out of his busy schedule to shame me on the national news. That’s how much pull these people have.

The Jewish News, the site that I believe first released the story, wrote:

Following calls for swift action from community leaders, A UKIP spokesperson told Jewish News: ‘Jack Sen, a UKIP candidate, has expressed views that in no way reflect the views of the Party and any other of our hard working dedicated candidates. In the light of these and other comments Mr Sen has been suspended from UKIP with immediate effect.’

From running a pretty successful campaign to being dumped for a pretty harmless Tweet was quite a shocker. To say that it sent me reeling would be an understatement of the grandest proportion.

Making matters worse was the fact that I’d merely stated what most of Liverpool also thought about Berger — that she was not an ‘authentic Labour’ candidate due to the fact that she had been parachuted into Liverpool by the Labour Party elite, was born and raised in wealthy West London, educated at an all-girls boarding school in Hertfordshire and groomed for the job by Lord Greville Janner, the Zionist Jewish peer who has been investigated for paedophilia on numerous occasions. Berger having “divided loyalties” stemmed from the fact that she had professionally lobbied for our money to be sent overseas while serving as the Director of Labour Friends of Israel.

Everything I said was based on truth. The only mention of Berger’s Jewishness came from a Wikipedia quote, pulled from the internet.

I am certain even Berger, who has an uncanny ability to feign moral outrage over any criticism directed her way, knows the Tweets were fair, but decided to use them to her advantage, as she has in the past. I’m not the first person she has gone after for non-existent anti-Semitism, and I am certain I won’t be the last. By now I’m certain Ms Berger has the Jewish News and groups like ‘Hope not Hate‘ on bloody speed dial.

Regarding my chances: the polls actually closed about 45 minutes ago. I am actually working on this interview while waiting for the results to come in. I thought it would be good to finish the interview before my views were skewed by the results of the election.

Although my area is staunchly Labour, and based on my analysis, about 40% of my electorate realize that I am no longer representing UKIP, I still think I have a chance to get a good result. In 2010 the UKIP West Lancs candidate finished with only 3% of the vote. I expect I will get between three and five times that. Because people do tend to vote along party lines in Britain I expect I will lose a few thousand votes as a result of the suspension.

(Update: I received 12% of the vote,taking in more votes than UKIP MEP’s Paul Nuttall and Steven Woolfe, both of whom were high-profile prospective members of Parliament who also stood in northern England.)

Being suspended as unceremoniously and publicly as I’ve been definitely impacted my chances negatively. I was in the midst of a highly co-ordinated campaign that was making incredible gains. My goal of reaching 20% is now impossible due to the fact that many people think a vote for me is a wasted vote — sentiments expressed by many people I meet on my travels and who write to me via my website.

I’ve encountered scores of people that believe that if they vote for me their vote won’t count, so it’s been tough.

I had no idea whether I’d even be on the ballot or that I could campaign during the home stretch due to the fact that no one from head office would respond to my emails since my being suspended. I was blocked by my advisers on social media and literally shut down during the last week — the most important week, of the campaign. The only emails I received from HQ were ones accusing me of being anti-Semitic and informing me that I had been suspended.

I was literally attacked in every major newspaper. Nigel Farage held a press conference to tell the nation how much of an embarrassment to the party I was. Paul Nuttal, UKIP’s deputy, immediately gave a speech in which he ripped me to shreds, claiming extremists like myself had no place in the party and UKIP would stomp on people like me. The buffoon used a whole lot of hyperbolic language — never revealing what I’d said, just that it was anti-Semitic.

Being betrayed in this manner because of Jewish pressure has been a bitter pill to swallow. Nigel was in fact the reason why I became involved in UKIP, and for Paul, the local MEP for the northwest — someone that I have socialised with on several occasions — to attack me publicly as he did, tells me the people running UKIP are immoral and unethical … and not for me.

Another result of the suspension has been the hatred I have received from local Leftists, who feel that because I have been suspended for ‘racism’ from ‘racist’ UKIP that they have the go-ahead to attack me.

This past week our chairman received several hate-filled letters, one of which included my postal leaflet in it. Some miscreant decided to scrawl a Hitler moustache on my face, drop an SS officer’s cap on my head and scribble in the names of Himmler, Goebbels and other well known Reich officials below the faces of my council candidates.

I believe that the menacing letter was only sent because I was publicly reprimanded for criticisng Jewish hegemony over this country and our way of life, and other off limits topics.

Then there’s the impact it has had on my ability to campaign.

This past weekend I was accosted by a group of Labour campaigners demanding that I leave the market square as I was a “racist, an “anti Semite” and “Nazi”. They engaged me in an aggressive manner waving their fingers in my face. Although I was out-numbered— I was only with my wife and baby daughter, I stood my ground and the cowards scurried off back to their holes before things got out of hand. Some lovely elderly ladies that happened to support my message, helped defuse the situation.

A man with a conspicuously strong Scouse (Liverpool) accent — the region where the aforementioned Luciana Berger represents — attempted to drown out my legal right to canvass by shouting the word “anti-Semite” at me each time I attempted to engage people in Ormskirk (the regional seat).

It is my belief many of these people were paid by Ms Berger’s office to attack me during my scheduled street surgeries as their being at my events was too convenient. The fact that it never happened prior to the Berger Tweets tells me all I need to know.

Let’s just say that it’s been a tough go since Berger manufactured claims of anti-Semitism.

People often ask me why I was suspended for what amounts to a jibe at a rep from another party.

UKIP simply decided that it was better business sense to appease an influential Jewish group that funds them in London, than stand by their parliamentary candidates.