<3 <3 <3 Forever the Supreme Leader of our hearts <3 <3 <3

It looks like the much celebrated takeover of North Korea by Kim’s lovely anime sister is probably canceled.

Nobody has any idea what goes on in North Korea, unless you can see it on satellite images or state television. Not even North Koreans have any clue what’s going on, except for a handful of people at the top.

Basically, North Korea is Schrödinger’s country, and Kim is neither alive nor dead until directly observed.

That said, if anyone outside the country knew what was going on, it would most certainly be the South Korean intelligence services. They are the most invested in knowing what goes on in North Korea, and all of their people can pass for North Korean in order to manage informants.

So, if they say Kim is alive, that is as good as we’re going to get.

The Guardian:

South Korea has said that Kim Jong-un, is “alive and well”, downplaying rumours that that the North Korean leader was seriously ill after undergoing heart surgery.

“Our government position is firm,” Moon Chung-in, a special adviser on national security to the South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, said in an interview with CNN on Sunday. “Kim Jong-un is alive and well.”

The adviser said that Kim had been staying in Wonsan – a resort town on the country’s east coast – since 13 April, adding: “No suspicious movements have so far been detected.”

…

“We have nothing to confirm and no special movement has been detected inside North Korea as of now,” the South’s presidential office said in a statement last week.

Speculation about Kim grew after Daily NK, a Seoul-based online media outlet that employs North Korean defectors, claimed he was recovering after undergoing a “cardiovascular procedure” earlier this month.

Citing a single unidentified source inside the country, it said Kim, who is believed to be 36, had required urgent treatment due to heavy smoking, obesity and fatigue.

Soon afterwards, CNN reported that Washington was “monitoring intelligence” that Kim was in “grave danger” after undergoing surgery, quoting what it said was an anonymous US official.

So, let’s break that down. One anti-DPRK site posted an article, citing one anonymous source, that Kim was having heart surgery. Then, CNN reported that one anonymous US official said that they were monitoring that site.

And then, the rumors started.

Compared to CNN and all the downstream press that followed their lead on this, the North Korean state media is clearly a much more reliable source of professional journalism. They certainly spin their angle, but I do not think they could get away with lying this brazenly.

This is not the first time Kim’s absence from public life has sparked rumours about his health. He dropped out of sight in late 2014 but reappeared more than five weeks later using a walking stick. Days later, South Korea’s spy agency said he had undergone surgery to remove a cyst from his ankle.

This was not even the first time they did this hoax of “he’s really dead this time, guys.” I understand that they also did this hoax to Kim’s father on and off for five years until he actually died.

Absolutely shameful.

As for anyone asking why he doesn’t just go on TV to prove he’s still alive: Well, if you were Kim, what would you do? Would you show up on TV, and set the precedent that underpaid failed journos can demand proof of life at any time? Or, would you just chill out at your resort, and let the Western media discredit itself?

The winning strategy is to let the uncertainty ride itself out, so that if he ever actually dies, it will look the same and no one will know.

In theory, this is good news for humanity. No one in the region needs a destabilizing internal power struggle in North Korea right now. Everyone needs them to continue along their path of peaceful modernization and wait for Western hegemony to collapse, so that they can develop a better relationship with South Korea and work towards their shared goal of one unified Korea.

But, in practice, this is terrible news for memes.

No one knows exactly what North Korea would have looked like under Kim’s sister – but we know it would have been hot.

Would it have been a brutal open air concentration camp, with daily gassings and saponification of all who did not avert their eyes and tremble before their Iron-Fisted And All-Consuming Supreme Mommy Dictator?

Or would it have been a workers’ paradise of cleanest race socialist comrades laboring contentedly under the wise and loving care of an Eternally Resplendent And Pure Supreme Kawaii Princess?

We may never know what could have been. But we will never forget.

Kim Yo Jong will forever rule over us in perfect happiness – if only in our hearts.

Getting 11-year-old girls to shove stuff up their vaginas in front of a webcam appears to have a similar level of difficulty as tricking them into thinking that you’re their 16-year-old boyfriend while in fact you’re a 21-year-old lesbian woman.

That is to say; it is pretty easy.

Daily Mail:

One in three child abuse images found online are now selfies with girls as young as 11 tricked into performing sex acts via web cam.

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) took action over 124,605 images of child abuse found online between January and November 2019, of which 37,112,  or 30 per cent, were self-generated.

More than three quarters of these images, 29,100 or 78 per cent, featured children aged 11 to 13, most of whom were girls.

The IWF and charity Marie Collins Foundation (MCF), that supports survivors of abuse, are calling on young men who find images or videos on porn sites that they believe may be of underage victims, to anonymously report what they have found.

Before the advent of smartphones, keeping your 11-year-old daughter away from the eyes of random internet creeps was a pretty straightforward task: you just needed to not give her access to a webcam or digital camera.

Now that phones are smart and can access the internet and take pictures, giving your daughter one of these devices so you can more easily reach her also means that she’s more easily reachable by everyone else.

Perhaps allowing young humans to fuse with these gadgets wasn’t the brightest decision.

Now everyone’s pretty much addicted to them.

Under UK law, anyone can be prosecuted for taking, sharing or possessing explicit images of under-18s.

Chief executive of the IWF, Susie Hargreaves, said the number of children being tricked or blackmailed into generating indecent images online is ‘fast becoming a national crisis‘.

She said: ‘Today’s data demonstrates the alarming rate at which self-generated imagery is increasing, especially among young girls – often in domestic settings.

‘These are images and videos where girls have been groomed, coerced and tricked into performing sexually over webcam, what is fast becoming a national crisis.

‘There has never been a more poignant time to shine a light on the uncomfortable truth we are now faced with.

‘While we’re working to prevent images from being taken in the first place, efforts to halt the spread of the ones in circulation, by encouraging young men to anonymously report any they may unintentionally stumble upon, is an important and much-needed step to help tackle the issue.

‘Young men might be at risk of stumbling across this content as a result of having unprecedented access to sexual content online – but they can also be the heroes that help us save many more victims of child sexual abuse.’

Young girls are being tricked into joining the camwhore business.

To prevent that without giving up the ability to call and text their daughters, fathers could opt to give their daughters dumb phones.

No camera, no web browser. Just phone calls and texting.

The above is just one example.

There’s really no reason why 11-year-old girls should be able to take pictures of themselves and access social media and the internet without their parents’ supervision.

The IWF works to get images of child abuse removed from the internet and is in contact with law enforcement agencies across the world.

Chief executive of the Marie Collins Foundation, Tink Palmer, said: ‘Online sexual abuse is not a victimless crime.

‘The children in these images and videos are real and they are harmed every time the content is viewed and shared.

‘All internet users need to understand that they are breaking the law if they view this material, regardless of who has taken or uploaded it.

‘Everyone can play their part in ridding the internet of this scourge by reporting illegal images and, ultimately, in protecting children.’

Once the video or picture is online, it is almost impossible to remove it from the internet, and if for some reason it is removed from every website, there’s no guarantee that it won’t be uploaded it again.

The only way to prevent these girls from suffering the consequences of people viewing indecent and illegal content of them online is to prevent them from producing said illicit content in the first place.

“Children” in the United Kingdom are grooming and sexually exploiting themselves in record numbers.

Although Grindr is mentioned here, and as far as I’m aware that is an exclusively gay sex app, we can safely assume that most of the really pre-pubescent children getting involved in this are female.

Metro:

The Digital Secretary has said he will be writing to Tinder and Grindr asking what measures they have in place to keep children safe, after an investigation claimed they are at risk of being exploited on the apps.

Children are at risk of exploiting themselves in the dating app. They have to literally download the app, work around the age verification, sign up, create their profile, and then use the app.

Those are quite a few hoops they have to jump before landing on a dick.

Police have investigated more than 30 incidents of child rape since 2015, where victims were sexually exploited after evading age checks on dating apps, the Sunday Times reported.

Those “victims” knew very well what they were signing up for and what they were evading those age checks for. Everyone knows what those apps are for. If they didn’t know what they were for they wouldn’t know what they were at all.

The newspaper said records obtained through Freedom of Information requests showed 60 further cases of child sex offences via online dating services, including grooming, kidnapping and violent sexual assault.

The youngest victim was eight years old, the paper said.

The findings were described as ‘truly shocking’ by Jeremy Wright, Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

Yeah no shit man. Either 8-year-old girls are already looking for dick or 8-year-old faggot boys are looking for gay dick.

Faggot 8-year-old boys are definitely worse. Whores gonna whore, after all, independently of their age.

He added: ‘I will be writing to these companies asking what measures they have in place to keep children safe from harm, including verifying their age.

‘If I’m not satisfied with their response, I reserve the right to take further action.’

If he’s satisfied with their response he won’t do anything to prevent lolis from revolting further? Okay then.

A man was jailed last week for two-and-a-half years after spending the night with a 12-year-old girl who he claimed he thought was 19 and had met on a popular adult dating app.

Carl Hodgson, 28, invited the child to his flat in Manchester city centre a few days after they first made contact via an app.

The girl invited herself to his flat, in fact. You can read all about that story here.

These dating apps and stuff usually require people to be 18 or older in order to sign-up, which if honored, leaves out what’s arguably the horniest demographic: early and mid-teens.

Of course, teenagers don’t really need Tinder or any other dating app to have sex with their peers. They can do that through normal socializing, Instagram, and other stuff. The fact that they are choosing to use Tinder or other such apps suggests they want to engage with older people they can’t directly meet through their normal teenager environments, and the ones likelier to want that are women first and foremost, followed by homosexual boys.

There’s also absolute fringe cases such as that 8-year-old mentioned in the article, which is just absolute degeneracy. But cases such as the 12-year-old girl lying about their age and telling a man she was 19 before inviting herself to his flat are good examples of how the constant sexual imagery displayed in the media combined with women’s biological instincts result in situations deemed inappropriate by our current cultural state.

It’s quite the contradiction.

On the one hand children are left on their own to consume all kinds of TV shows, movies, and other media packed with sexual programming and Jewish degeneracy. On the other hand, people expect them not to feel anything about it, not to be curious about it, and not to want to engage in it.

The kikes have unleashed women’s sexuality. Age is no longer a barrier strong enough to contain it.

Pubescent girls are looking for sex on dating apps.

The sexual liberation is real, and it must be reversed.

Carl Hodgson, 27

I was told there was an impending incel revolt coming up,. Instead, 2019 has given us a loli revolution.

Take a deep breath because this is going to rustle some gears.

Daily Mail:

An office worker who lost his job and home after he spent the night with a 12-year-old schoolgirl who pretended to be 19 has been jailed for two-and-a-half years.

Carl Hodgson, 27, brought the girl to his Manchester quayside apartment after he met her on a dating app – not realising she used a fake profile which claimed she was ‘experienced’.

He admitted to carrying out a sex act on the girl and took an explicit image of her in a body stocking, writing: ‘Mine was decent, nailed that bird, unreal bod.’

He was arrested a month later after the girl’s mother found her daughter had logged onto his home WiFi and told police.

tfw Huawei 5G technology could have prevented this.

Of course it is the mother blaming the man for her daughter’s behavior.

He said he did not know the girl’s real age and that it was her who suggested they go back to his apartment.

The girl, who is known to regularly go missing from home, admitted posing as a 19-year-old and said Hogdson did not know her real age.

That’s where this story should end if we were living in a sane world. The girl tricked the man into thinking she was older, they had a consensual encounter, and they both went back to their lives.

But we’re not living in a sane world.

We’re living in a surreal waking nightmare realm.

And you saw the lede.

It didn’t end there.

Do you think it matters that the girl literally told the authorities that the man was innocent as he did not know her real age?

Hodgson admitted engaging in sexual activity with a child, making and distributing indecent images and was ordered to sign the Sex Offenders Register for life.

He was banned from contacting girls under 16 without permission of their parents for seven years, and disqualified from living and sleeping in same household as child under 16. His not guilty plea for rape was accepted.

Judge David Stockdale QC told Hodgson at Manchester Crown Court: ‘You have expressed regret and remorse of your actions and I consider your remorse and regret to be genuine.

‘Whilst she was 12 at the time of these events, you did not believe that to be the case.

‘You took the complainant to your flat and you in due course spent the night with her and caused her to pose indecently for your own gratification. You were to boast later that you had sexual activity though it is fact you had not.

‘The complainant was by reason of her age highly vulnerable to exploitation and she was no doubt impressed by you.

‘This is most serious offending as you will now have appreciated. The effects on a child of such a young age of offending of this sort are well known and well documented, and these effects will last for the rest of the child victims life.

…

‘It’s inevitable, she will suffer in the long term as a result of your offending.’

…

Prosecutor Justin Hayhoe said: ‘He says he met the her through a dating application and her personal profile was over the age of consent. It stated she was experienced and he regarded their meeting as a date.

…

‘She presented herself on her social media profile as someone over the age of 16. She did say a meeting took place at the defendants flat and she maintained to the police that the defendant thought her age was 19 rather than 12.’

That’s right. In clown world, a girl tricks you into thinking she’s older and suggests you two go back to your flat, you engage in some kind of “sexual act” – which was not intercourse, according to all parties, and which I assume was probably finger-banging as he performed it on her – and you are so unaware you did anything wrong that you post publicly about it on the internet.

And then you go to jail because SURPRISE! she lied to you about her age and that somehow makes you a criminal and a terrible monster.

The Jews are really working hard to scare white men into not engaging with white women.

What that judge told the poor man looks like something taken out of a black comedy movie or something. But that’s the current state of the West. Girls aged 13 and 14 are willingly prostituting themselves to 67-year-old men and 11-year-old girls are swapping phone numbers with 33-year-old refugees and arranging 4 AM sexual encounters with them.

Now 12-year-old girls are pretending to be 19 on Tinder or whatever and inviting themselves to men’s flats to drink alcohol and do sexual stuff.

Welcome to the West.

Don’t bother looking for an exit. There isn’t one.

In mitigation, defence lawyer Alexander Leach said: ‘The defendant used a dating app, one which was used for adults designed for contact with other adults. It’s an extremely popular application widely used by various cross section of society.

…

‘He must have known she was significant younger than him, but he believed her to be older than 16. If he had been aware, he would not have deemed it appropriate to take her to the apartment and provide her with alcoholic drinks.

‘He has lost his employment, his home and he has the stigma which comes with offending of this sort.

‘There is no evidence this defendant sought out children for sexual gratification. It wasn’t his intention to commit the offence – it’s been a frightening experience for him.’

Doesn’t matter, pal. He’s a man, therefore patriarchy. Therefore pig.

Therefore punishment.

Yes. This is really happening. Just as 11-year-old girls in the United Kingdom are swapping phone numbers with Moslems triple their age and arranging 4 AM sex encounters with them, American girls are pushing hard to break the decency glass ceiling that keeps them down.

These two girls decided it would be a good idea to have sex with a 67-year-old man to make a quick buck, and a brave Kansas judge was not afraid to call them what they are. Aggressors wanting to suck the man’s pockets dry.

Fox News:

A Kansas judge has come under fire for saying in court that two girls–solicited by an online predator to have sex with him when they were 13 and 14–were partly to blame for what happened to them.

“Predator”? Is that a typo?

These bitches were doing the soliciting. Old dude was a John, and the victim. There is a 100% certainty they said they were older. You can say “he should have noticed their age” – well, he’s 67. He can’t see very well.

“I do find that the victims in this case, in particular, were more an aggressor than a participant in the criminal conduct,” Leavenworth County Judge Michael Gibbens said in remarks delivered at a December sentencing for a 67-year-old man who paid for sex with the two girls, according to a report in the Kansas City Star.

The Star reported on Sunday that Gibbens ignored prosecutors in sentencing Raymond Soden to nearly six years in prison. Prosecutors said Soden had a prior conviction for battery and sexual battery and had asked that he be sentenced to more than 13 years in prison.

The paper reported that Gibbens explained his reasoning for the more lenient sentence by saying that the two girls went to Soden’s house voluntarily and took money from him for sexual favors.

“They were certainly selling things monetarily that it’s against the law for even an adult to sell,” he said, according to the paper, which obtained a transcript of the sentencing.

Girls aged 13 and 14 literally whoring themselves out to seniors. As long as they get paid, anything goes.

This is really happening.

It’s funny to think people still talk about “empowering” women. How much power do they want? What else is there for them to do? Cannibalism?

The more “freedom” we give them, the more they show us their true colors, and these are very grim colors.

This incident is not likely to be the first time they turned a trick, and who knows at what age they started doing it. At least in this instance, they also did it together. Thirteen and 14-year-old girls in a threesome with a 67-year-old man for money.

And this isn’t even Matriarchy’s final form.

Girls’ natural depravity gets potentiated from an early age by the Jewish media. It starts with Disney inflating their egos.

Then Sex and the City.

Then the average Netflix show.

Social media shows them thirsty men are so desperate for a drop of their juice that they’re willing to do anything. They’ll buy them dinner and take their home for the hope of receiving a kiss after repeating the process four or five times. They’ll drive them anywhere hoping to accumulate favors that they think they can later redeem for sexual activity.

They’ll do anything as long as they think there’s a chance for them to take a sip.

These smart girls realized all of that is a waste of their time almost as much as it is a waste of men’s time, so they skipped the charade and went straight to the point. Which makes them quite honest, really. They don’t pretend to be ladies while being whores, and instead they accept the premise of being whores and they go from there. This makes everything easier for everyone.

A child advocate in Shawnee, Kan., told the paper that the two girls were minors and victims, not the aggressors.

“Sexual assault is never the victim’s fault. It doesn’t matter what the girls did or didn’t do, he is still the adult and nobody deserves to be taken advantage of sexually,” Michelle Herman said, according to the paper.

There you have it. These girls literally asked the man for payment, then knocked on the man’s door, undressed themselves and started doing the sex thing with him out of their own accord so they could get said payment.

But it’s still the man’s fault, you know? Because he’s a man and should’ve known better! The magical age of consent line determines whether a front-hole is a victim or an empowered wombyn.

It doesn’t matter what women do, it’s never their fault.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.

In a sick society, women’s depravity starts manifesting very early in their lives.

Metro:

A man has been jailed for eight years after he arranged to pick up a young girl from her home to rape her.

Shamol Miah, 33, of Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, admitted raping the girl, 11, after meeting her in Mansfield town centre last May.

They swapped mobile numbers and messaged one another, arranging for him to pick her up from her house at 4am.

Truly a sign of progress.

He then took the girl to a secluded area where he raped her in the car before returning to the town centre to drop her off.

That must have been an awkward ride.

lol not really, because it’s obvious he didn’t rape her.

They swapped phone numbers, they arranged for him to pick her up at 4 AM, and he drove a bit and then they had sex in the car.

That’s what she wanted, and that’s what he wanted. But her parents found out she went out at night, smelled the remains of the sexual act in her and probably went through her phone and she freaked out and told them she actually just wanted to “like talk for a bit and get to know him” and that he raped her instead because she’s definitely not a little whore that sneaks out of her home to fuck invaders.

He “admitted” raping the girl the way innocent people plead guilty to get a better deal. Plus, “rape” in this singular context of girls under 15 (or whichever arbitrary age) is removed from the feminist concept of “consent.” Or “consent” morphs into something totally different than “make the personal decision to engage in an act.” It’s not clear. Whatever the semantics situation, the Western media and government will always use “rape” when talking about girls under a certain age, even if they are meeting the guy at 4 AM to fuck in a car.

Obviously, it should be illegal to have sex with 11-year-olds, but taking this Victorian Age position of “the virtue of the woman violated” is insane. This is a dumb bitch going to fuck an Islamic conqueror, because that is what women (and girls) do: they fuck conquerors.

This guy was sentenced to 8 years, meaning that under UK law, he will serve 4. So clearly, the UK government does not consider this a big deal. He will be 37 when he gets out, and more preteen girls will be texting him for fuck sessions, and he’ll use a burner phone for the hook-ups so he doesn’t get caught next time.

This is happening right now in the UK. 11-year-old girls are having consensual sex with haji invaders triple their age.

Thanks, Great Britain.

You’re truly Great now.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.