It appears that the liberal press has belatedly found out that bad shit happens in Brazil.

Now, the rest of the world found that little bit of trivia out the minute that LiveLeak and BestGore came online, when the total and uncensored weeping sore that is the Third World was revealed to millions of coddled Western Whites all at once.

This sort of thing has been going on for many Internet years and probably decades before that. The only thing that has changed is that the media has suddenly decided to become a professional round-the-clock internet nigger defense force and decided to throw a gay moral fit about it.

The Guardian:

Naked and whimpering, his trousers around his ankles, the black teenage boy jerks and howls with pain as he is whipped with electric cable.

“Are you going to come back?” asks one of his tormentors. The youth shakes his head, unable to speak because he has been gagged.

Even by Brazilian standards of racism and cruelty, the whipping of the boy after he was caught stealing four bars of chocolate from a São Paulo supermarket has caused deep shock.

That simply isn’t true. This was pretty mild fare. And because I have normal T levels, I thought the whole thing was mildly amusing and shared a chuckle with the guards on the video.

Cellphone footage of the boy’s ordeal has been widely shared, and many – including the detective investigating the case – have drawn comparisons with the country’s treatment of black people during three centuries of slavery.

“It is like a scene from centuries ago,” said detective Pedro Luis de Souza, describing the victim as “a defenceless, homeless black man … A victim of society, I would say.”

So was it a boy-thief or a homeless black man who dindu nuffin?

Scenes of thieves – often young black men and teenagers – being tied up, tortured and even murdered are common in Brazil.

Based.

Even so, de Souza said he was “extremely shocked” when a journalist sent him the video on Monday afternoon. He began an inquiry, interviewed the victim and identified the two security guards.

The youth said he was stopped after leaving the supermarket by guards who found he had stolen chocolate. “They tied him up and whipped him until he promised to not do it again,” de Souza said, adding that the crime of torture carries a prison sentence of up to eight years.

The youth, who has not been named, told TV Globo the guards threatened him.

“They said if I spoke to anyone, they would kill me,” he said, adding it was the third time he had been assaulted by the same two security guards after stealing from the supermarket.

Incredible. The thief even admits that this was the third time that he had stolen and been chased off by the guards, who at that point realized that more drastic measures were necessary. There is no way that the guards were White, either. This was a brown-on-brown incident, but Whitey still gets blamed – because of course.

No matter how many times I see it, I am still shocked by the sheer unbridled contempt for white people and general faggotry of the liberal press.

It often renders me speechless.

But yeah, non-Whites do unspeakable and disgusting things to each other. Someone should look into that.

That guards filmed the torture showed how sure they were they would not get caught, Adami said: “All this is connected to the slavery past in Brazil where blacks were whipped night and day.”

Seems like every country that had black slaves figured out that only corporal punishment worked on blacks. And really, isn’t a few lashings and a lesson well-learned more humane than going in and out of prison on the taxpayer’s dime for years and years at a time?

I guess even liberals believe that monkeys belong in cages.

Djamila Ribeiro, a black writer, philosopher and television presenter, said the video showed how institutionally racist Brazil was. In 2017, 75% of Brazil’s 65,000 homicide victims were black or mixed race.

Mestizos and mulattos murdering one another for cheap chalupas in the favelas. This isn’t racism – these monsters are just feral and devour each other like some kind of hobgoblin creature from hell might.

In Africa, other blacks would have burned this thief alive after poking him around with their dull machetes for a bit.

I don’t want anything to do with these people. I’m not about that life. And yet, the nigger internet defense force wants me to accept both the boy-thief and the guards with whips into my country, where they can continue their cycle of thievery and lashing and uploading to the internet for likes from their huehuehue monkey countrymen.

We all know Jews operate on a wild battery of double standards that they try to keep a jealous secret, and when a brave soul dares point them out, they threaten and attack them. There used to be a whole industry of political commentary dedicated to covering for this double standard, called “Conservatism,” but it is waning after the Jew Neo-Cons put all their chips on Hillary and blew their credibility.

It’s impossible to make billions in Manhattan real estate without an intuitive understanding of the Jew and his odious psychology. I’m not saying Donald Trump hates every individual Jew, but he definitely knows how dangerous Jews are when they get together in a group, and without a doubt notices that their impact on our country and the world is detrimental.

For the less savvy, Trump’s meeting with Netanyahu makes him a cuck, but there was a subtle troll at this event that brought bat ears to attention across the political spectrum.

Reuters:

Donald Trump said today that he was open to a “one-state solution” to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, appearing to casually back away from a decades-long US commitment to supporting a separate Palestinian state alongside Israel.

Speaking alongside Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of their first meeting at the White House, Mr Trump was asked if he supported a two-state solution or a one state-solution to the long-running conflict.

“I’m looking at two-state and at one-state and I like the one that both parties like,” Mr Trump said.

“I can live with either one. I thought for a while the two-state looked like it may be the easier of the two but honestly if [Mr Netanyahu] and if the Palestinians, if Israel and the Palestinians are happy, I’m happy with the one they like the best.”

Mr Trump’s openness to a one-state solution is a break from the policies of Barack Obama, George W Bush and Bill Clinton, all of whom tried to broker a peace deal that would lead to the creation of two separate states.

Terms like “Two-State Solution” and “One-State Solution” to the Israel-Palestine conflict are abstract-sounding; this language is used purposefully, so that you don’t know what they’re talking about. The two-state solution, which is what American politicians are paid to support, is a plan to deport Israel’s indigenous Arab population to a Palestinian state, and create a racially homogeneous Zionist country.

Trump’s little off-the-cuff remark about a “one-state solution” is something which Jews are angered at the mere mention of. A one state solution would mean Israel absorbs the Palestinian territories and integrates the Arab population as fully-protected legal citizens. In such a scenario, the Arab population would outnumber Jews about 3 to 2.

What’s wrong with the one state solution? Aren’t Jews the most tolerant, open minded and cosmopolitan people to ever live? Why does diversity work everywhere in the West but not in Israel?

Every last Jewish and Zionist institution supports a “one-state solution” for white countries, and their genocide organs (the media, academia, finance) constantly stress how beautiful it is that whites will be outnumbered and outvoted by non-whites in the near future.

In fact, when white nationalists and black nationalists want to discuss the prospect of a desperately needed two-state solution in America, the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League call it “hate” and put them on a targeted-harassment list. Yet, these same Zionist groups believe anyone calling for an American-style racially pluralistic democracy in Israel is also “hate”!

The Right of Return

Typically, Jewish racists pretending to be hippy-citizens of the world have evaded direct rebuttals of exactly why they don’t want to share a country with non-Jews by claiming that the Palestinians don’t want it either. This is a lie bolstered by cooked up polls. The two dominant Palestinian parties, Hamas and Fatah, both have the Palestinian “Right of Return” as dominant aspects of their platforms. The right of return is the assertion that Palestinians who were ethnically cleansed from Israel in 1948 and 1967 have a right to move back into the homes and properties they once owned and were never compensated for.

There is a much stronger legal and ethical case for this claim than there is for the “Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society” assertion that endless millions of random non-whites in other countries are entitled to live in America on our tax dollars and social services because of a poem written by some other Jew about the Statue of Liberty.

The belief in the right of return is so strong among Palestinians, that Fatah arguably lost the last election over taking bribes in support of a no strings attached “two-state solution.” In recent years, they have gone back to supporting this important plank. Hamas’ principled stance to refuse to negotiate until Palestinians going back to homes they have deeds to in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, etc. is on the table, as well as being able to equally access Muslim holy sites in Israeli territory, is the basis from which cuckservatives and Zionists attack them as “refusing to recognize the Jewish state.”

The Jew Unmasked

Netanyahu knew to play it cool while next to Trump, but his agent behind the scenes, Commissioner Gordonberg, beamed the spotlight. Ratmen got the signal.

Some Jews, like Alan Dershowitz, interpreted (or tried explaining away) Trump’s remarks as a ploy to attack Palestinians and so supported it. A minority of Jews saw it as an endorsement of South African style Apartheid and applauded his comment, but I don’t think this is what Trump intended at all.

Trump’s brilliance here is that at the same time he is being barraged by organized Jewry for his immigration restrictions, he has simultaneously forced them to go around talking about how Israel must be kept racially Jewish at all costs. It isn’t just rabid Kahanists who are reacting, but also high profile liberal Jews, writing for hard Left publications, being forced to awkwardly attack Trump for suggesting maybe a “diverse” Israel is an option, while the related headlines around their article call him “racist” for banning Somalis.

Here are some examples from some very anti-Trump, anti-white, pro-mass immigration publications that support my theory. Some reactions are more extreme and kneejerk, while others are more surgical.

The Atlantic, by (((Adam Chandler))):

Though increasingly diminished and undermined, the two-state solution has endured since then—through the assassination of an Israeli prime minister, an intifada, the Israeli disengagement from Gaza, and three subsequent wars. In some of his final remarks as secretary of state in December, John Kerry made an urgent plea for the survival of the idea. “Here is a fundamental reality: if the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic—it cannot be both—and it won’t ever really be at peace. Moreover, the Palestinians will never fully realize their vast potential in a homeland of their own with a one state solution.”

Nevertheless, after decades of American diplomacy, jockeying, and cajoling, the two-state imperative did not survive a four-question press conference with President Donald Trump. And, in its place, there are still no other alternatives.

What about diversity and inclusion Adam? Last December, this brazen Jew wrote a fawning article on his fellow Jews working as immigration lawyers heroically defying Donald Trump, overtly implying that there are no alternatives but to make America brown. But for Israel, there are “no alternatives” but to keep Israel a majority Jewish Talmudic-authoritarian country.

The New York Times, Editorial Board statement:

President Trump came forward with a nonsensical statement on Wednesday as he dangerously backed away from the two-state solution, which has been central to America’s Mideast policy for more than 20 years and remains the only just answer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

…

Mr. Trump voiced optimism about getting a “great peace deal” between Israel and its neighbors. While Mr. Trump did urge Mr. Netanyahu to “hold back” on settlements in the West Bank and said Israel must make compromises, he offered no details on any peace initiative, and the vagueness of his remarks suggests he has no inkling of how to move forward. His willingness, however, to lend credence to those who would deny a separate state to the Palestinians will certainly make peace harder to achieve. Palestinians have long sought their own state and are sure to reject the idea of having their lands annexed by Israel, even if offered some kind of limited autonomy.

How many Palestinians are on the New York Times editorial board? Yet this Jew fake news portal once again claims to speak in their name.

Meanwhile, the actual Palestinians at Electronic Intifada liked Trump’s statement.

Electronic Intifada:

Advocates of a two-state solution, including the previous US administration and European governments, see it as the only way to rescue Israel as a racist state that ensures its Jewish demographic majority through a battery of racist laws – a situation they refer to as “peace.”

The New York Times of course doesn’t agree with Palestinians that Israel is also their country. They are the natives, and had a functioning and sophisticated state before Jews began flooding into it. They have a right to be there, unlike millions of Oaxaca Mexicans Jews transplanted into California.

Jerusalem Post:

According to J street, Trump’s statement that was “both meaningless and dangerous” and essentially “removed the anchor that has steadied and stabilized US policy toward the region”.

“How can there be a negotiation, let alone an agreement, when there is no longer a consensus on what the end goal should be?,” they said. “To be clear, there is no one-state configuration that leads to peace. There is no resolution to this conflict without full political rights and independence for both peoples.”

The organization added that “all so-called ‘one-state solutions’ are recipes for more violence that will ultimately threaten Israel’s identity as a democracy and a Jewish homeland” and that the two leaders “seemed detached from reality”.

They added that President Trump’s vagueness on this issue will likely dismay key allies of the US in the Arab world and will embolden extremists within Israel, among Palestinians and throughout the region.

J Street is considered a “liberal” Zionist group with a special place in their heart for Palestinians. Except when Trump talks about them having to share a country with these indigenous people, then the real Jew explodes out of their chest like a scene from John Carpenter’s The Thing.

This reaction from the (((Congressional Democrats))) speaks for itself.

Al Monitor:

Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, called Trump’s comments “shameful” and “short-sighted.” Last year, she spearheaded a letter to then-President Barack Obama signed by 394 House members — 90% of the entire chamber — reaffirming Congress’ support for a two-state solution.

“A two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians is the only means to ensure Israel’s long-term security and enable Palestinian aspirations for their own state,” she said in a statement Feb. 15. “That is why presidents from both parties, the vast majorities of the House and Senate, and the American people have consistently supported this objective, and why President Trump must as well.”

The top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs committee, Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., agreed on the substance.

”The alternatives to a two-state solution would mean that Israel would have to choose between its commitment to democracy and the solemn obligation to be a homeland for the Jewish people,” he said in a statement. “The parties must come back to the negotiating table to find a mutually agreed-upon solution.”

The top Democrat on the committee’s Middle East panel, Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., shared similar thoughts.

“The goal of this process must continue to be two states for two peoples living side by side in peace and security — a Jewish democratic state of Israel and a demilitarized Palestinian state,” he said in a statement.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., told Al-Monitor that Trump “doesn’t really understand the issues.” Earlier in the day Nadler tweeted out an April 2015 letter from Netanyahu in which the prime minister wrote him that he remained “committed to a sustainable two-state solution.”

“Certain things are very clear. You have to have a two-state solution, because you’re going to get no other solution,” Nadler said. “A one-state solution just means you’re going to try to impose your will on the Palestinians, and that’s a formula for war eventually, or you have a binational state, which has never worked in the Middle East, which is never going to work, and the dream of Zionism for 2,000 years for a Jewish state goes up in smoke.“

Vox, by (((Sarah Wildman))):

By abandoning an American-led, negotiated two-state solution, Trump is essentially giving up on the idea of there ever being a real, internationally recognized sovereign Palestinian state. Many Israelis and Palestinians believe that outcome would not only destroy any hope for peace between the two sides, leading to years of violence. They believe it could fundamentally alter, if not destroy, the Jewish and democratic state of Israel as we know it

…

In part that is because of demographics: Absorbing the Palestinian population would eventually result in there being more Palestinians than Jews in the country. To maintain a democratic state, with equal rights for all people, Israel would have to cede its Jewish character. The alternative is undemocratic — giving Palestinians unequal rights and treating them as second-class citizens.

I’ve written extensively about the extreme anti-white vitriol published by Vox. Predictably, it’s run entirely by Jews who get fat Wall Street investments.

Huffington Post, by (((David Harris))):

In the end, however fraught with difficulty the two-state path might be, the one-state alternative is even more menacing because it is simply not sustainable. Sooner or later, it would sound the death knell for Zionism as we know it. Hence the concern about President Trump’s comment, even if this is surely not what he intended.

Why would a few million Palestinians be the “death knell of Zionism,” since nations are nothing but passports and a set of values? That’s the kind of thinking Jews forcefully impose on everyone else!

The quotes in this article are only the tip of the iceberg. There are literally dozens of high profile media Jews who oppose any immigration restriction in America who are furious about Trump’s comment.

The Jew Harris, whose gang of international Kikes at the American Jewish Committee personally went to Greece to get Golden Dawn thrown in jail, is an egregious hypocrite to say the least.

Some people think that pointing out Jewish double-standards is a fruitless endeavor, and it is – but only when you’re trying to point them out to Jews. Of course, trying to play that “I’m a White Zionist” game to get Jews off your back is pointless (although it can lead to some mildly effective moments if non-Jews are watching).

But in the end, National Socialists are distinct from Zionist Jews. National Socialists accept that all races have a right to their living space. We do not endorse driving natives out of their land, whether it’s the people of Tibet, the Palestinians or the Germans in Germany.

But Israel isn’t Jewish land, and looking at the reaction from Left-wing Jews at what is essentially a very mild comment (he didn’t even say it would be US policy), Trump has stumbled upon a gaslighting gold mine.

For whites, people who live by double-standards are viscerally offensive. If you show the average white person that organized Jewry is behind every unpopular immigration project in the West while at the same time holding virulently racist views in the only country they have loyalty to, it will resonate.

With a bigger audience than ever, renew that prescription of red pills on this topic. It didn’t work before because nobody was listening. They’re listening now.

The Daily Stormer editorial board hereby endorses a One-State Solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, with full right of return to all Palestinians forced out of their homes and property.

This explains her bad decisions, like writing ads for Hillary and marrying a Jew.

The whole Wikileaks Podesta email dumps have rustled jimmies around the globe, and no one is in a more acute state of rustlement than former “conservative” MP and current Heat Street “journalist” Louise Mensch.

She is in fact so rustled that she has been calling in every favor she feels she’s owed (and likely offering some new “favors” to anyone who will aid her) to try and get the British authorities to cause an international incident by storming the Ecuadorian embassy and dragging hero Assange out the front door by his neck.

Julian @wikileaks doesn't have "diplomatic immunity" as he is about to find out. 🙂 #wikileaks https://t.co/9vVNDK0M1x

— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 12, 2016

Sounds rough.

Not from criminal prosecution no. #Assange currently faces only one charge. I will go to UK police tomorrow. https://t.co/WVgBsO7UFx

— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 12, 2016

Sounds rougher!

What could Assange have done to upset the duplicitous little shiksa so badly you ask? Well, Wikileaks exposed her for a political traitor, writing ads for the Clinton campaign, and that hurts her “conservative cred” just a tad, and her (((bosses))) at Heat Street likely aren’t happy about that.

Ad for Hillary Clinton secretly written by Heat Street 'journalist' Louise Mensch https://t.co/BHAdbGPYqH pic.twitter.com/JFNXvHotm9

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 12, 2016

So, yesterday I’m just scrolling through my mentions on twitter, and some enterprising Stormer linked me to this little conversation.

Arrest isn’t good enough, now that she can’t get him arrested. Now he must die.

Now, bear in mind that to the knowledge of myself and this website, Mensch is not a racial Jew, but she did marry one, and it appears as though she’s taken the Jewish subversion directly into her DNA by osmosis…or something [Editor’s Note: Perhaps through injection. -AA].

Mensch and her rat kike husband.

Let’s examine some of the hubris-filled and insane Jewish narrative that she spews like autistic volcano, shall we?

Assange is a nobody.

In that tweet, Louise tacitly acknowledges that her actions may well get Hero Assange killed, but she says she will face no repercussions because he, unlike her, is a “nobody.”

He’s a rapist racist antisemitic misogynist traitor with rotting gums.

I ask you, does that sound like a “conservative journalist” to you? It sounds like a shrieking junior college SJW to me.

Muh Rape! Muh Anti-Semitism! Muh Misogyny! MUH FEELS!

I said Louise Mensch has absorbed Jewry, likely from her husband, and the proof is in her responses to the release of her traitorous email.

Muh jews. Muh anti-Semitism.

Muh Russian spies. Muh James Bond BS. Muh pussy-grabbing. Muh serious reporter look.

Then we get to the denoument: Her moment of realization that she is powerless to do anything.

@CarolyneMas @JJEROME2012 @johnpodesta I know but hopefully he rots and dies in the embassy so his victims will have justice. In sha Allah.

— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 17, 2016

…hopefully he rots and dies in the embassy so his victims will have justice.

Victims?

Who are the real victims here?

Perhaps her former constituents who thought for all the world they were voting for a conservative? Maybe the readers of Heat Street who were getting Jewed into being anti-Trump due to her participation in the coordinated and vicious full-spectrum smear campaign being directed against Glorious Leader?

And what’s with the “In sha Allah” business anyway?

Perhaps all the American people as well as everyone on Earth who opposes one-world globalism and wishes to enjoy the benefits the nation-state has to offer?

Mensch, like the rest of the kikenpresse, has overplayed a bad hand. They smelled blood, and this, combined with their fear of The Donald has led them to a point where not only does no one trust the media, most of us wouldn’t mind seeing them hanged.

Louise, Trump will be our next POTUS, and I’m sure he will do as he says and push for sensible regulations to hold liars like yourself accountable for abusing the rights and privileges afforded you by The Bill of Rights.

You can contact Heat Street on Twitter to demand they fire this lying fake journo.

@heatstreet

Slate has spoken. [I Was a Victim of the Fake “Knockout Game” Trend, Slate.com, 11-25-13]

There is no ‘knockout game’ attacks, where a white individual is attacked by either a black individual or a gang of black people (many times labeled teens or youths in news stories).

Slate has spoken, twice. [Sorry, Right-Wing Media: The “Knockout Game” Trend Is a Myth, Slate.com, 11-25-13]

The panic by those daring to notice black people are attacking white people is the real threat.

Think Progress has spoken. [Media Feeding Panic Over The So-Called ‘Knockout Game’ That Might Not Even Exist, ThinkProgress.com, 11-25-13]

Police, completely dominated throughout their ranks by those professing loyalty to Black-Run America (BRA), understand the idea of the ‘knockout game’ is an urban myth.

The New York Times has spoken. [Police Unsure if Random Attacks Are Rising Threat or Urban Myth: ‘Knockout Game’ a Spreading Menace or a Myth, New York Times, 11-22-13]

Using the combined reporting of the previously cited articles, a black reporter from “the nations newspaper” assures us no such as an epidemic of ‘knockout game’ plagues the nation.

The USA Today has spoken.[Reports: Alleged trend of ‘knockout game’ a myth: News outlets say there is no data to support notion that ‘knockout game’ is growing trend., USA Today, 11-27-13]

So say it three times, loud and proud (if you want to, click your heels together and throw confetti in the air too!): there is no ‘knockout game’.

There is no ‘knockout game’.

There is no… wait, what?

Of course the game exists!

Back in late 2011, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorialized on the subject, noting the attacks on white people – and Asians – by gangs of black people (“the blacks,” right Donald Trump?) was just “the spirit of the times,” comparing the game to a foreclosure on a mortgage or the lack of universal healthcare. [Editorial: The ‘knockout game’ and the spirit of the times, 11-1-11]:

It’s hard to judge how bad a problem the so-called “knockout game” really is. But because it has resulted in the death of 72-year-old man, left at least a half a dozen other people injured and reinforced fears about the safety of city neighborhoods, it’s bad enough.

Roving bands of teenagers slugging people just for the hell of it? That takes us into “A Clockwork Orange” territory.

Then you’ve got the city’s mayor and his police bodyguard happening upon one victim lying on a sidewalk outside a public library branch and the mayor suggesting that 13- and 14-year-old kids arrested for the crime be charged as adults.

You’ve got a police captain talking about a “trend of sub-human behavior [that] defies predictive analysis because the attacks happen in different places, on different days and at different times.”

In the last 15 months, police said, seven such attacks have taken place in neighborhoods around Tower Grove Park and South Grand. There were incidents in 2006 and 2007 in Carr Square and Dutchtown. There may well have been other assaults not tagged as “knockout” incidents or that went unreported.

Predictably, some people who work with young people point to a lack of recreational opportunities and quality education programs. Mayor Francis Slay, who rolled up on one victim on Oct. 21 just in time to see his attackers saunter away, is enraged at the thought.

“You can provide all the recreational programs and quality educational programs every day,” he said, “but ultimately each and every individual has a personal responsibility to respect each other and saying they’re bored is not an excuse, it’s a cop-out, and that’s a problem in and of itself.”

Reporter Denise Hollinshed of the Post-Dispatch talked to some kids outside of Roosevelt High School, one of whom acknowledged that he’d taken part in the “knockout king” game.

“Knockout king is a thrill,” the kid told her. “It makes you want to keep doing it every day.”

Sure, the kid said, he knew he could hurt somebody. But he added, “You don’t know them, so why care about hurting them?”

That’s a chilling statement. It reflects an almost sociopathic lack of empathy.

The above editorial was from November 1, 2011.  Two years later, the major news organs protecting (and charged with promoting) the concept of Black-Run America act as if the game is still in Loch Ness Monster territory. Perhaps it’s time to hire those two white guys from the Discovery Channel’s popular MythBusters program to walk those mean streets of black St. Louis, where life is valued about as much as the latest version of Nike’s Air Jordan is worth.

Remember: any community that has to “march” for peace is one that will spawn a generation of individuals who have no problem attacking white individuals [Black marchers protest St. Louis crime, violence, USA Today, 6-1-2008]:

Black ministers, businessmen and community leaders have been working since February on a plan dubbed “Call to Oneness” to reduce crime and violence and resurrect struggling neighborhoods in St. Louis.

They have called it nothing short of a “state of emergency” that demands immediate attention.

“It’s really awesome to see the black community come together for a peaceful purpose,” said Shannon Malone, 27, of suburban University City as she held her toddler. “There’s an urgency to stop all these homicides.”

As the march neared Tandy Park, where organizers challenged the crowd to be accountable to one another, 56-year-old retired carpenter James Bailey said the solution is simple.

Funny: those black participants in the march against violence from 2006 were merely protesting their own community, for St. Louis’ crime and violence problem is an exclusively black problem. What is life like in a homogeneous black community in St. Louis, where many of these “knockout game” participants have their roots [In Places Like North St. Louis, Gunfire Still Rules the Night, New York Times, 11-19-2013]:

The unmistakable pop of a gunshot ricocheted through the park in the humid air, and Montez Wayne could only hope that the bullet did not have his name on it. He sprang from his seat beneath a sprawling bald cypress, ready to make his move.

Was today the day?

He had seen it play out too many times before: the blast of gunfire, the blood, the body. In Mr. Wayne’s neighborhood and others on the North Side of St. Louis, drugs, poverty and struggle go hand in hand with gun violence. He barely knows his father. His mother died when he was 14, around the time he started selling drugs. His list of dead friends grows each year.

Mr. Wayne lives in a poor, mostly black community, where, as in similar neighborhoods across America, residents are fed up with persistent gun violence. Victims die one by one, or in clusters. In Chicago, 23 people were shot in a matter of hours in September, 13 of them in a park in a gang-related attack. Three died.

Some communities have begun their own initiatives. The 21st Ward was the first to install street surveillance cameras, spending $600,000 out of the ward’s capital improvement budget on 25 of them. A 46-inch flat-screen television in a community center shows footage from every camera, but no one currently monitors them full time. Shortly after they went up two years ago, one camera caught a drive-by shooting. The police caught the assailants a short time later, said Antonio French, the ward’s alderman.

Guns don’t kill people, dangerous minorities do in St. Louis (map courtesy of the New York Times)

George Orwell may have written 1984 to describe the horrors of a total surveillance society, but Big Brother technology is needed to document the horrific life black individuals create in their communities.

Only such a community as this could birth the Knockout Game. [Knockout King: Kids call it a game. Academics call it a bogus trend. Cops call it murder., RiverFrontTimes.com, 6-9-2011]:

City officials have begun to recognize the problem. St. Louis Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce acknowledges the existence of Knockout King, based on admissions by five defendants. Most of those defendants were charged with misdemeanor assaults, Joyce says. One incident transpired in Tower Grove Park, another in Carondelet. A third involved a kid riding a skateboard who attacked a woman in the Central West End. “He just blindsided her,” says Joyce. “She was seriously injured.”

The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, too, knows of the violent ritual. “The ‘knockout game’ is played by a group of kids who, as outrageous as it sounds, go around with the goal of knocking people out, for apparently no reason,” says Chief Daniel Isom. The department came to that determination about a year ago, says Isom, who adds that he doesn’t consider the violent activity to be widespread. “Based on our intelligence, we believe it’s an isolated group of maybe five to nine kids,” he says.

There exists no network supporting, promoting, protecting, and lobbying for the interests of white people, particularly those loathsome members of the white working-class. Matthew Quain had no bullhorn to speak into and demand financial and legal retribution for his plight, while Slate, Think Progress, the New York Times, and the USA Today exist to promote the downtrodden nature of black America and the vicious white racists who keep this racial group from fulfilling their potential.

When the world found in North St. Louis does represent the full potential of the black race (without the redistribution of white tax-dollars).

How about some more on the ‘mythical’ face of the Knockout Game, Matthew Quain?[Knockout game’ case shocked St. Louis, then fell apart, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 3-4-2012]:

The police captain couldn’t believe it. He had the Knockout King in his office.

It was September 2011, and police were struggling to get a handle on a series of vicious knockout assaults in south St. Louis. Groups of teens were cold-cocking older pedestrians at random. One was dead, several injured. Residents were alarmed, police baffled. It didn’t make sense, such a cruel and cowardly crime.

Now, sitting in Capt. Jerry Leyshock’s office was an important key to the mystery: the Knockout King. That was the teen’s nickname, said the four other young men also swept up that night by police after yet another assault. They sat inside South Patrol headquarters. And the ringleader, they said, happened to be right over there.

Leyshock took stock of the young man in his office. The kid looked 17 or 18. He was stocky, his hair cut in short dreadlocks. He wore a hooded sweatshirt. The captain, who coached youth boxing, thought he recognized the teen as a boxer from the Cherokee Recreation Center. The teen, for now, revealed little. Then he mentioned he was 16, a juvenile. Too young to talk with police alone. The interview was over.

In a moment, the teens would be released. But first, Leyshock, in his white dress shirt and black tie, gold badge on his chest, leaned in close.

“I think it’s a safe bet we’re going to pay you a visit whenever a knockout case comes up,” the captain said.

The meeting with the Knockout King would turn out to be a crucial break in a crime that hadn’t occurred yet — a case of cavalier brutality that would shock a city, especially after the accused attackers were set free.

On Oct. 21, Matt Quain, 52, a dishwasher, was severely beaten in a knockout assault on South Grand Boulevard. The mayor helped rescue him. Seven middle schoolers, some as young as 12, were arrested. Then, at a juvenile court hearing in January, the main witness, a 13-year-old classmate of the defendants, failed to show up. The case was tossed out.

The kids celebrated. Others howled.

“People all over the city of St. Louis are outraged over this,” Mayor Francis Slay said.

The case seemed to captivate the city with a series of difficult questions: Why was this happening? How would it stop? Was witness intimidation a factor?

Even though the mayor of St. Louis witnessed the aftermath of this attack, the game is still a myth, a figment of white xenophobes deepest, darkest dreams [St. Louis Mayor Witnesses Aftermath of “Knockout Kings” Attack, CBS St. Louis, 10-25-2011]

Luckily, this mythical story ends with – as only fiction can provide – a happy ending. One of those mythical Knockout Game participants in the attack on Mr. Quain, Demetrius Murphy, was gunned down in an attempted burglary. [Teen Killed In Attempted Burglary Was Suspect In Knockout Game, Fox 2 St. Louis, 2-18-2013]:

The teenager shot and killed by a homeowner while allegedly breaking into the man’s house had been in the news before.  In fact, FOX2 has learned, he was once charged in the case that made the phrase “knockout game” common in St. Louis.

Demetrius Murphy, 15, died Friday morning after he and another teen, Michael Bryant, allegedly tried to break into a man’s home on Tennessee.  Police say the homeowner emerged with a gun.  Bryant ran, but they say Murphy confronted him and was shot and killed.

When it happened, the ears of Matt Quain perked up.  It was back in 2011 that Quain and a friend were walking along Grand, returning from a “beer run” to Schnucks, when they say a group of teens jumped them.   Quain was beaten badly, suffering neck injuries and a broken jaw.  He was discovered bleeding in the street by Mayor Francis Slay and his security guard.

Murphy, just thirteen at the time, was the one identified by Quain as his attacker.  Sources tell Fox 2 that Murphy was headed to trial in the “knockout game” case, but a young witness suddenly refused to testify, forcing the charges to be dropped.

Quain sees what happened to Murphy as part of a circle of violence that needs to be stopped.

“Ya know, I’m not happy that somebody died,” he said Monday.  “I just wish there was more that people could do to put an end to it.  Whatever it takes, more cops, whatever.

There is no ‘knockout game.’

Slate has spoken.

Think Progress has spoken.

The New York Times has spoken.

The USA Today has spoken.

Matthew Quain? He has no voice, no organization or lobbying group to document his story for the masses. So the ‘knockout game’ will continue to be a myth, peddled by creepy, unwashed racists, living in their parent’s basements.

Kyle Rogers
CofCC
November 27, 2013

Daily Beast, Slate, Think Progress, and more other far-left news site all published articles claiming that black racial mob violence is a myth.

The extreme far-left staff at Daily Beast wrote that so-called “knockout game” violence by black mobs is “overblown panic over a crime wave that doesn’t exist.”

I guess this is why Daily Beast is losing millions of dollars per year. If your going to write fake news, it has to be really funny for people to actually want to read it.

Another high profile far-left website, Slate.com, wrote that black racial mob violence is “a myth.” They attacked the “right-wing media” for perpetrating this alleged myth.

Think Progress, which is run by a former Obama White House staffer, also joined in. That website claimed that black racial mob violence “might not be real.”

Actually, Think Progress published one element of the truth.

This website has repeatedly reported that the term “knockout game” started as a euphemism for black hate crime violence by the St. Louis, MO area media. The term “knockout game” was used to conceal the racial nature of the attacks. It was one of numerous regional euphemisms used by left-leaning reporters. In Philadelphia, media has commonly called it “flash mobs.” In England, the media has commonly called it “happy slapping.” In New York City, it has been called “wilding.” Using the phrase “attempted robbery,” is another common euphemism used by media all over the country to conceal black racial violence.

Think Progress correctly identifies the St. Louis media as creating the term “knockout game.” However, this is where they fly off the rails. Think Progress claims that “conservative” and “racist” websites popularized the term. In reality, the websites Think Progress is referring to have been fighting the media’s use of euphemisms such as “knockout game.”

We have been telling you straight up that the attacks are racially motivated mob violence by young blacks targeting non-blacks, especially whites. Think Progress flips reality upside down.

Think Progress claims conservatives are attributing values to the “knockout game” to distort public perception of the crimes. In reality, “knockout game” was coined as a propaganda euphemism by left-wing reporters to distort public perception of the crime! Conservatives are trying to strip off the layers of media propaganda.

What Think Progress, Daily Beast, and Slate are doing is tantamount to libel against the victims of black racial mob violence. This is no different that falsely claiming that a war crime never happened, because you support the party or ideology that perpetrated the war crime.