The man is angry that the faggot is dressed like a faggot in public and says that the act of dressing like that is disrespectful, especially considering there are children around.

He also tells him that he’s going to beat him so hard that his faggotry will disappear, right there beside the security guard, because he doesn’t give a fuck.

Daily Mail:

A thug offended by a gay man’s clothing threatened to ‘beat him straight’ during Pride celebrations in Barcelona.

The confrontation was filmed in a McDonald’s in the city and the thug claimed that the man was dressed inappropriately as there were children in the restaurant.

His target was dressed in a yellow top and tight denim shorts and was filmed telling the McDonald’s security guard that he does not ‘need to tolerate a guy telling me how to dress’.

The footage was posted on Twitter and it has been watched more than 4.2 million times since.

The thug, dressed in black, said: ‘I am telling you to be discreet, you are in a public place.

‘I don’t care if you are a queer.’

When the other man pointed out that it was ‘Gay Pride Day’, the aggressor replied: ‘I don’t care what day it is, it is also a good day to punch you. Do you want to see?‘

Every day is a good day to punch a faggot. Unfortunately, punching people for being faggots is illegal, because if it weren’t, most people would do it and faggots would not rot our society from the inside out — which is what the Jew needs as a cover to operate from the shadows.

We’re here dealing with trans this and trans that discussing whether or not we should prevent people from entering our land against our will while the Jews advance their agenda.

This degeneracy thing has always been a distraction.

It’s a fog concealing Jews.

According to local media, the police arrived at the restaurant shortly afterwards but the victim refused to press charges against the other man.

The McDonald’s restaurant condemned the aggression and added that the security staff called the police.

Good.

Beating faggots is not the ideal solution though, as doing that may expose one to all kinds of nasty diseases homos carry in their blood.

Even beating women nowadays is a risk unless they’re very young, but even then, you’re not completely safe from all of the herpes and chlamydia and HPV and stuff because they’re all sluts.

When dealing with women, it’s better to opt for a well-placed Falcon Punch.

Works every time.

Throwing faggots off of rooftops is better than a beating but still not ideal, as the splash can be quite a nasty thing. I mean, unless you have a specific place to throw faggots where no one gets close to the blood splatter — in that case, it could work.

The most elegant solution to the faggot problem is also the most elegant solution to the Jew problem.

Gas chambers.

Real gas chambers this time.

Our cities are freak shows.

Daily Mail:

People around the world have taken to the streets today adorned in rainbow colours and glitter to celebrate the annual Gay Pride Parade.

From Mexico City to North Macedonia, millions of members of the LGBT community and allies took part in the march.

This year is particularly significant as it marks 50 years since the Stonewall Riots which began on June 28, 1969

The demonstrations at the Stonewall Inn in New York City are considered to be one of the most defining moments in the gay rights movement.

Look. I’ve thought about this. We have to take control of our countries because there’s nowhere else to go. If we Escape from the West because we couldn’t get our house in order, aren’t we kinda doing the asylum seeking thing by moving somewhere better? Countries have the Jews they deserve yadda yadda.

There’s nowhere for us to run…

…on the surface of the planet.

We have to Escape from Earth.

If you think that escaping is for cowards, take a look below.

Those are our streets.

They are desecrating the cities made by our ancestors.

Institutions defend The Gay, yet The Gay acts oppressed. Laws, academia, politicians, government, the media and everything and everyone defend faggotry.

For now, I’m boarding some Russian space station. We have to work on getting our asses to Mars though before these heretics also infect it with The Gay.

It would be more like a tactical retreat.

Once we’ve established our civilization in Mars, we’ll muster our forces and declare TOTAL WAR ON PLANET FAGGOTRY.

THERE’LL BE NO PLACE FOR SODOMITES TO HIDE.

EVERY DEGENERATE WILL BURN.

THIS IS THE INQUISITION

HAIL FUTURE GOD EMPEROR OF MANKIND

HAIL MARS

HAIL VICTORY

Fat disgusting legs.

Heterosexual fat whore Taylor Swift is championing for the faggot community, and some of these freaks are not happy that a STRAIGHT FAT WHORE is lecturing people on GAY AIDS-SKINNY ISSUES.

Like, the fuck does she know about HIV and being skinny?

Daily Mail:

Taylor Swift has been hit with backlash following the release of her pro-LGBTQ single, as detractors accuse the ‘corporate’ pop star of jumping on the ‘queer bandwagon’ to make profit.

The track, titled ‘You Need To Calm Down’, was released last week to mark Pride Month, and its lyrics positively reference gay activist organization, GLAAD.

The song additionally hits out at anti-LGBTQ sentiment, with the lines: ‘Control your urges to scream about all the people you hate/ Because shade never made anybody less gay‘.

Who even screams about faggots in the West anymore? They are the ones doing the screaming every time the rest of the world refuses to suck a dick.

While fans have been quick to praise Swift for being an ‘ally’ to the gay community, others are blasting the 29-year-old for what they believe is a cynical exploitation of queer culture.

Swift has been the subject of ire on social media, with hundreds of Twitter users hitting out at the new single.

Last week, Swift surprised fans by performing her hit ‘Shake It Off’ at the Stonewall Inn, the New York gay bar widely regarded as the birthplace of the current gay rights movement.

Her performance came just weeks before the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, in which queer patrons clashed with police officers, setting off widespread protests.

Several social media users were less-than-impressed that Swift, who identifies as straight, would take to the stage at the venue.

Meanwhile, since the single’s debut last Thursday, GLAAD told NBC News that they have received an ‘influx’ of donations.

The organization’s director of talent engagement, Anthony Ramos, said that the fact that Swift ‘continues to use her platform and music to support the LGBTQ community … is a true sign of being an ally.’

Ramos added that ‘You Need to Calm Down’ is the perfect Pride anthem, and ‘we’re thrilled to see Taylor standing with the LGBTQ community to promote inclusivity, equality, and acceptance this Pride month.’

Meanwhile on June 1, Swift performed at an iHeart Wango Tango concert in Los Angeles while wearing a rainbow colored outfit, encouraging fans to contact their senators to appeal to them about passing the Equality Act, according to Reuters.

GLAAD noted that Swift had made a ‘very generous donation’ to the organization at the start of the month as a way of honoring Pride Month.

It’s true that it’s weird and overall creepy how this straight fat pop star is trying to become some kind of faggot pride symbol. There are plenty of gay and bisexual pop stars that could represent the degenerate community.

Why choose straight, fat and white Taylor Swift for it?

She’s not even covered in tattoos and mutilated.

She doesn’t even have AIDS!

What could she possibly know about “gay pride” if she’s not gay?

What is she even proud about? Being fat cis scum?

Look at that adipose belly.

If she wants to have a voice in the faggot world, she’s got to start dating women or self-harming her body. She has to turn herself into a freak if she wants to be the standard bearer of degeneracy.

This is how the world works.

Old childless fat whore Taylor Swift is so deprived of meaning that she may soon choose to do a Black Pride anthem too.

She may even do the Angelina thing and adopt some niggers to play mommy with.

It’s all too suspicious.

Actually, wait.

She may be a secret tranny.

That would explain her fixation on LGBTFATQZP+ issues and her hormonal problems.

Bishop Thomas Tobin

Trying to protect people from The Gay is a controversial matter these days.

AP:

Rhode Island’s Roman Catholic bishop on Sunday defended a tweet urging Catholics to not support or attend LGBTQ Pride Month events, saying it was his obligation to teach the faith “clearly and compassionately, even on very difficult and sensitive issues.”

Diocese of Providence Bishop Thomas Tobin sparked a backlash beginning Saturday when he tweeted, “A reminder that Catholics should not support or attend LGBTQ ‘Pride Month’ events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary to Catholic faith and morals. They are especially harmful for children.”

A reminder that Catholics should not support or attend LGBTQ “Pride Month” events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary to Catholic faith and morals. They are especially harmful for children.

— Bishop Thomas Tobin (@ThomasJTobin1) June 1, 2019

The posting spurred rebukes by thousands of people who replied on Twitter, including actresses Mia Farrow and Patricia Arquette. Many invoked the scandals of clergy sexual abuse of children in the church.

“This is pure ignorance & bigotry,” Farrow wrote. “Ignore this hate-filled hypocrite. His mind set leads only to suffering. He brings to mind those priests who molested my brothers. Of COURSE we should embrace our LGBTQ brothers and sisters and children. Jesus spoke of love.”

Arquette tweeted, “Shame on you. LGBT kids are thrown out on the streets and abandoned because of poisonous thinking like yours.”

…

As of Sunday afternoon, 69,000 people had replied to the tweet, about 15,800 liked it and nearly 4,700 retweeted it. Many of those who replied supported the bishop.

The LGBTQ group Rhode Island Pride held a rally outside the diocese’s headquarters in Providence on Sunday evening.

“Jesus never said a word about homosexuality, about Pride, or the Queer community,” the group’s president, Joe Lazzerini, said in a statement. “Rhode Island Pride respectfully calls on Bishop Tobin to do some self-reflection as the majority of Catholic Rhode Islanders in this state reject the idea that to be Catholic is to be complicit to intolerance, bigotry, and fear.

The Church is not really in the best position to talk against The Gay anymore, considering it’s been taken over by faggots.

Every now and then someone publicly reminds people that the Church is not completely homo yet and all hell breaks loose.

There’s a couple of things to address in this story, starting with what Mia Farrow said.

“Jesus spoke about love.”

Mutually masturbating with your favorite human sex toy isn’t “love” because the purpose of love is life.

You have to understand that love is a conduit for life.

There is no sterile love.

The purpose of loving your friends, loving your family and loving your neighbors is to create a prosperous environment where life can flourish. It keeps Chaos, Terror and Destruction at bay.

The Gay is antithetical to love because it is, at its core, sterility. It is a virus that degenerates, that breaks down healthy social ties, that corrupts and rots everything around it.

It is Destruction.

It is Death.

Love is Creation.

Love is Life.

Now, regarding what the leader of Rhode Island Pride said…

“Jesus never said a word about homosexuality.”

Here’s a stake to burn these heretics.

The Master’s Seminary, “Did Jesus Never Address Homosexuality?” by Michael Riccardi:

I want to address a popular argument made by those who try to reconcile homosexuality with Christianity. The argument is that Jesus Himself never said a word about homosexuality.

Those who make this argument grant that Paul condemned it as sinful (Rom 1:26–27; 1 Cor 6:9–10; 1 Tim 1:9–10). But the sentiment behind this objection is that Paul had corrupted the way of life and the ideology that Jesus came to propagate, and that Jesus would have been “loving” and “accepting” of homosexuals, just as they are.

But is it true that Jesus never said anything about homosexuality?

Actually, like the other similar objections, there are several reasons why this argument does not hold up to biblical and logical scrutiny. Today I’d like to address five of them.

Argument from Silence
First, it must be noted that this is an argument from silence, and thus rests on a shaky rational foundation. Jesus also didn’t say a word about pedophilia, bestiality, or rape. But it would be absurd to seek to garner support for any of those abominable acts on the basis of such silence.

Special Pleading
Second, this objection rests upon a premise that the objectors reject—namely, that the Bible is God’s infallible Word. What I mean is: the only source of knowledge for the claim that Jesus never said something about a particular topic is the Bible itself.

The argument is: “Jesus never said anything [implied: as we see recorded in the Bible] about homosexuality.” Yet it is the authority of this very Bible that these folks deny when they refuse to accept Paul’s teaching on homosexuality. So the argument itself is a case of special pleading. Those who employ it appeal to an authority that they elsewhere explicitly reject—namely, the Bible as God’s Word.

No Reason to Say What Everyone Agreed Upon
Third, a great portion of Jesus’ ministry related to Israel and those familiar with the Law of Moses. They were living in an age under the Mosaic Covenant, which explicitly condemned homosexuality (Lev 18:22; 20:13). Unless there was some precipitating issue that would force Jesus to comment on homosexuality, the only reasonable conclusion — especially in light of the fact that Jesus viewed the Old Testament as the very Word of God (e.g., Matt 22:43) which was infallible (John 10:35) — is that His view of homosexuality was the Old Testament’s view (i.e., God’s view) of homosexuality.

What Jesus Did Say about Marriage
Fourth, when Jesus did speak about marriage, He affirmed it as an institution between a male and a female. In Matthew 19, the Pharisees asked Him what He thought about divorce, hoping to trap Him into disagreeing with Moses and therefore finding reason for condemning Him.

In His response about why divorce is a bad thing and a result of the hardness of human hearts, Jesus says, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”

If Jesus wanted to simply and efficiently answer the Pharisees’ question about divorce, He could have done so by skipping immediately to verse 5: “Have you not read that the two become one flesh?” That’s really the answer to the question about divorce. God joins spouses together as one flesh, and man shouldn’t separate what God has joined together.

So why does He start, in verse 4, by reminding the Pharisees that God made human beings male and female? For two reasons, at least. First, He makes this point to underscore that marriage, by its very nature, is a divinely-ordained institution — that the originator of marriage is the Creator Himself.

Second, He emphasizes this point to clarify that the divinely-ordained institution of marriage exists only between one man and one woman. God created human beings as male and female, and then brought them together in one flesh. The husband-wife relationship illustrates the complementarity and unity-in-diversity that characterizes God’s own nature as one Being who eternally exists in three Persons.

…

So did Jesus address homosexuality? Yes, He did. He did so by sending His Spirit to superintend the writing of Paul such that what Paul wrote was precisely what Jesus intended, so much so that it could be said to be “God-breathed.” Jesus condemned homosexuality by means of Paul’s condemnation of homosexuality. And therefore, to deny that homosexuality is sinful is to deny Jesus Himself, and that is irreconcilable with true, biblical Christianity.

With that out of the way, now consider the fact that this Bishop’s tweet is a polemical matter prompting people to attack him and to argue that Jesus wasn’t against faggots because Christianity didn’t throw homosexuals off of rooftops.

Everyone knows that Islam hates The Gay.

Why not protest that with at least the same level of energy that they use to protest anything related to Jesus?

The Religion of Peace on Islam and homosexuality:

What is Islam’s position on the treatment of homosexuals?

Islam goes beyond merely disapproving of homosexuality. Sharia teaches that homosexuality is a vile form of fornication, punishable by death.

Quran (7:80-84) – “…For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds…. And we rained down on them a shower (of brimstone)” – An account that is borrowed from the Biblical story of Sodom. Muslim scholars through the centuries have interpreted the “rain of stones” on the town as meaning that homosexuals should be stoned, since no other reason is given for the people’s destruction. (Inexplicably, the story is also repeated in three other suras: 15:74, 27:58 and 29:40).Quran (7:81) – “Will ye commit abomination such as no creature ever did before you?” This verse is part of the previous text and it establishes that homosexuality as different from (and much worse than) adultery or other sexual sin. According to the Arabic grammar, homosexuality is called the worst sin, while references elsewhere describe other forms of non-marital sex as being “among great sins.”

Quran (26:165-166) – “Of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males, “And leave those whom Allah has created for you to be your mates? Nay, ye are a people transgressing”

Quran (4:16) – “If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone” This is the Yusuf Ali translation. The original Arabic does not use the word “men” and simply says “two from among you.” Yusuf Ali may have added the word “men” because the verse seems to refer to a different set than referred to in the prior verse (explicitly denoted as “your women”). In other words, since 4:15 refers to “your women”, 4:16 is presumably written to and refers to men.

…

Abu Dawud (4462) – The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.”  (This is a sahih hadith)

Abu Dawud (4448) – “If a man who is not married is seized committing sodomy, he will be stoned to death.” (Note the implicit approval of sodomizing one’s wife).

Sahih Bukhari (72:774) – “The Prophet cursed effeminate men (those men who are in the similitude (assume the manners of women) and those women who assume the manners of men, and he said, ‘Turn them out of your houses .’ The Prophet turned out such-and-such man, and ‘Umar turned out such-and-such woman.”

al-Tirmidhi, Sunan 1:152 – [Muhammad said] “Whoever is found conducting himself in the manner of the people of Lot, kill the doer and the receiver.”

Reliance of the Traveller, p17.2 – “May Allah curse him who does what Lot’s people did.” This is also repeated in three other places.

There are several lesser hadith stating, “if a man comes upon a man, then they are both adulterers,” “If a woman comes upon a woman, they are both Adulteresses,” “When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes,” and “Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to.” (Abu Dawud 4462 and al-Tirmidhi 1456)

It just seems ridiculously convenient that faggots would protest this Bishop’s statements about his religion not supporting faggotry while ignoring a religion that is openly killing them.

Could that have anything to do with the fact that MOSLEMS are mostly brown and that WHITE MAN BAD?

Apparently, June is “LGBT Pride Month.”

Like a lot of eugenicists who laugh at videos of Moslems throwing faggots off of rooftops in Saudi Arabia, I didn’t actually know this because I have a limited interest in homosexual rights.

Nonetheless, it looks as though this “Pride Month” is a big event for people who treat gerbils as suppositories, and a lot of major companies use it to virtue signal and market their wares.

The latest company to jump aboard the GRIDS train this year is Mars, whose marketers decided to temporarily re-brand their Skittles product to appease the one percent of the population that are mentally ill.

There’s just one problem: they fucked it up. And now, instead of looking like champions of life, liberty and the pursuit of sodomy, the marketers look like Klansmen determined to hunt down every last nigger in Dixie.

National Review:

In honor of Pride Month, Skittles has removed rainbow coloring from its candies — explaining that “During Pride, only one rainbow matters. So we’ve given up ours to show our support.”

As Heat Street notes, some of the sales of this candy will go to benefit LGBT charity organizations, so you’d think that progressive people would be at least a little hesitant to complain. You’d be wrong, though — a lot of people are very upset, because the fact that these Pride Month Skittles are white means that the company is racist and promoting “white supremacy.”

The funniest thing about this campaign is that it’s so unnecessary. Skittles are multi-colored sweets marketed under the slogan “Taste the Rainbow.”

You can’t get much gayer than that.

I mean, if you were the lead marketer for Skittles and your boss said, “Okay, some fag month is coming up, do something to pretend we care,” you’re not exactly stuck between a rock and a hard place here. At most, you could insert the words “THEY’RE FABULOUS!” onto the packaging and be done with it.

Skittles when it is LGBT Pride Month.

Skittles when it isn’t LGBT Pride Month.

The decision to dye a rainbow-colored product white for LGBT Pride Month is so surreal that it almost makes me wonder – no, hope – that this is a genuine act of White Supremacy designed to trigger SJWs for the lolz.

And trigger them it did:

Now, I’m pretty sure that any good marketing executive would probably advise companies to avoid associating white anything with “pride” anything in the future. This knee-jerk offense, however, is absurd. Skittles was trying to do a nice thing, and — as is all too often the case — people need to calm down.

Telling faggots and SJWs to calm down is like telling feminists to lose weight: it’s not going to happen.

These people are slaves to their hormonal imbalances; they’re going to act erratically constantly, even when companies pander to their perverse beliefs and desires.

It’s just not worth the trouble.

The Skittles team are better off embracing their obvious White Power leanings and coming out as proud supporters of the Confederacy. At least then they would have an established fanbase (Whites and the Black majority who secretly wish they were still slaves) to which they can sell their product.

Not that any Whites should be eating this sugary, ADHD-inducing junk.