This was obvious.

But it’s good they did a study.

RT:

A new survey has found that, despite expressing liberal views in public, most Americans’ actual beliefs are less extreme. The self-censorship goes two ways, with conservatives less supportive of the policies pushed by Republican politicians than they let on.

The Biden administration and liberal media outlets repeatedly argued that mask-wearing was an effective way of stopping the spread of Covid-19, and while 59% of Americans surveyed in March agreed in public, that number fell to 47% in private. Hispanics and whites were more likely to support pandemic restrictions in public but oppose them in private, as were women. While 63% of women publicly supported masking, only 44% actually believed it was effective.

Populace, the Massachusetts-based firm that undertook the study, attributed this discrepancy to social pressure. 

Yeah.

“The pressure to misrepresent our private views – to offer answers on politically and socially sensitive questions that are out of sync with our true beliefs – is pervasive in society today,” the think tank wrote.

The largest gap opened up when Americans were asked whether CEOs should “take a public stand on controversial social issues,” as many did in the wake of the 2020 murder of George Floyd.

While 28% of Americans publicly supported their business leaders sounding off on social issues, only 14% agreed privately. Some 44% of Democrats spoke favorably of socially conscious CEOs in public, but only 11% maintained these views behind closed doors. Notably, more Republicans – 20% – supported corporate activism in private. Likewise, college-educated Americans – typically considered more liberal than their uneducated peers – were less likely to support woke CEOs than Americans with a high school or lower diploma.

Broken down by demographics, some notable discrepancies emerged. Out of all demographic groups, Hispanics were the least comfortable sharing their private views in public. As of February, 55% of Hispanics would privately say that the US “should get back to life as usual with no Covid-19 mandates or requirements,” but only 39% would express this view publicly.

Some 71% of Hispanics would privately say that crime has increased in their communities, but only 56% would feel comfortable saying this in public.

This pattern fits with Hispanic voters’ migration to the Republican Party since the 2020 presidential election.

On abortion, 67% of Americans would publicly affirm that the choice to terminate a pregnancy “should be left to a woman and her doctor.” In private, this number falls to 58%, and while 60% of men would agree with the above statement in public, just 46% actually believe it in private.

While Republican lawmakers have accused school boards and teachers of focusing “too much on racism” in their lessons, Republican voters aren’t as concerned. 80% of GOP voters said that public schools are too focused on racism, with 63% actually believing this. However, Republicans are still the only demographic group in which a majority agrees with the statement.

Continuing on the theme of racism, while 53% of Americans would agree that “racism is built into the American economy, government and educational system,” 44% would agree in private. The difference in opinion is starkest among those aged 18 to 29, with 65% believing this theory of “systemic racism” in public, and 42% agreeing in private.

Here’s a question: what does it do to your soul to lie like this?

It can’t do anything good.

If everyone just told the truth about what they believe, we wouldn’t be in this situation in the first place.

I wrote today about DirecTV banning OAN at the direction of the alleged president.

As you can imagine, there was a mob of regime loyalists on Twitter praising this action. It’s all just boring.

This tweet struck me though:

Her account actually has a couple hundred thousand followers. Her bio says that she named it when she found out about the killing of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

According to the informations, this is the account of a white American woman.

Jamal Khashoggi was killed because after being censored in Saudi Arabia, he fled to various other countries, and was continuing to publish his materials (including in the Washington Post).

I very seriously doubt this woman knows what the Moslem Brotherhood is, or has ever read any of Khashoggi’s articles promoting it.

For those who also don’t know (why would you?), it’s a pan-Arabist Islamic religious/political movement that started in Egypt, and was outlawed by US-backed longtime Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak. When Mubarak was removed in 2011, a Brotherhood member was elected president, and they basically took over the entire government. Then about a year later, they were removed through a military coup backed by Barack Obama’s CIA.

A few months later, some Brotherhood people were still protesting the coup, and the CIA military guy did the biggest single day massacre in modern history, gunning down about 1000 people in public squares.

The military government still rules Egypt and has good relations with America. (After nearly a decade of military rule, the US government has not called for “democracy and human rights” in allied Egypt or threatened a war against them to force democracy on them, suggesting an invisible loophole in our values and who we are.)

I don’t personally know the ins and outs of the Brotherhood, which seems to be a largely confused organization, but Khashoggi’s position was that all Arab countries should be forced to hold democratic elections, wherein Brotherhood candidates would always win due to their strict religious policies (similar to the way Republicans will always win in Baptist counties), and that this would form the basis of a pan-Arabist Islamic union.

So, you can see why the Saudi regime would be opposed to him. It’s much harder to see why some white bitch on Twitter promoting vax propaganda would support him. She appears to be saying she supports him on the principle that he is a journalist, rather than because she is a supporter of the Moslem Brotherhood.

Censorship always happens to journalists before they are imprisoned and/or murdered for continuing to publish. Trust me – it’s something I’ve thought a bit about personally. So it’s just wacky that you’d feel so adamant about Khashoggi’s death that you named your account after him, but also be a supporter of the censoring of American journalists (whose content you probably couldn’t summarize any better than you could summarize the positions of the Moslem Brotherhood).

Obviously, this is just standard fair, but it seemed worthwhile to take the time to look at the microcosm of the absurdity of leftist identity. These people are all total wrecks personally, which is why they are able to keep up this level of cognitive dissonance in their politics. A normal, healthy person is not able to reconcile extreme contradictions like this.

Leftism feeds off of people being mentally and emotionally unstable.

Previously: How Does Anthony Fauci Manage to be Right So Consistently? (This is funny, I think.)

Jimmy Dore did a good video about how absurd it is that you’re supposed to believe everything that Anthony Fauci says, while Anthony Fauci is consistently changing what he says.

As Dore points out, it’s not just over time that he changes his orders – sometimes he changes his orders multiple times in the same interview.

Making a serious attempt to follow the orders of Anthony Fauci would be like making a serious attempt to play Simon Says with a cheater – a cheater who lies about his cheating, even when it’s on video, and then claims “I am Simon Says!” like Fauci claims “I am the Science!”

After playing the very funny clips of Fauci consistently contradicting himself, Dore lists off some fun headlines showing how the media is dealing with the fact that these Faucis are so difficult to follow, with their constant changes in their orders and lies about the changes in their orders.

Zimmerman, Siegel… even Dore won’t point out the strange pattern we find in the last names of people who right articles like this, which lines up with the strange pattern we find in the owners and CEOs of big pharma companies.

I feel bad for Jimmy Dore. He’s a “traditional leftist” or a “hard leftist” or something. But the left as it stands now is just a cult, utterly obsessed with submitting to authority.

As a “traditional rightist” or a “hard rightist,” I face similar problems as Dore in not being able to get the people who should by my natural support base to pull themselves away from the delusions spewed by the television and get on board with the program. But unlike Dore, I have a chance at this, and there are more and more people coming away from the Sean Hannity fake “conservative” right and coming my way.

I am hopeful about the future, as the vax is forcing battle lines to be drawn, more people are coming in my direction.

Dore, unfortunately, has no such reason to be hopeful. There is zero evidence that any segment of the modern left cares about anything other than worship authority, and feeling that they gain personal power by submitting to that authority, and working to force it on others.

The gap between me and the mainstream of the American right is much wider than the gap between Dore and the mainstream of the American left. In actual fact, Dore is closer to the mainstream of the American right than he is to the mainstream of the American left. At least the mainstream of the American right has some belief in questioning authority. The mainstream of the left has no such belief. They believe in worshiping authority, and take pleasure in doing what they are told.

Making the situation even more unfortunate, the majority of Dore’s viewers are right-wingers. If a leftist saw one of his videos, they would identify him as a “fascist.”

There is a small group of these leftists like Dore, which includes Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, and various other “socialist” types, but those people are now getting banned, and they’re getting steamrolled by the likes of Vaush and Hasan Piker.

Related: Hassan Piker and Vaush are Not Even Real Communists at All

These astroturfed fake socialists are being presented as the alternative to the mainstream left, even as they support every position of the mainstream left.

This phenomenon was most clear with Bernie Sanders’ 2020 presidential run, when he abandoned virtually all of the positions of his 2016 presidential campaign, and embraced “woke” leftist policies. No one seemed to even notice. Just so, AOC has completely backed off of all the policies she ran on, and no one seems to have noticed that either.

The left has abandoned any resistance to money and power, and is instead happy to see corporations run fat people in their advertisements for their useless consumer products.

While there is a future for the right, the left does not seem to have any future at all, in terms of serious adult behavior.

Related: ABC News – Brought to You by Walt Disney

The obsession of the left with the virus hoax, and the fact that you now have Antifa shooting people who are opposed to the vaccine, demonstrates that.

What’s more: the banhammer is coming for all of these “old left” people, and they’re going to then be left with us in no man’s land, trying to find anywhere at all to post their content.

Sean McCarthy was recently banned from Twitter.

This is what happens to people who call out the Italian lobby pic.twitter.com/kkd3mW3V2B

— Current American Citizen (@CurrentCitizen) September 22, 2021

Many leftists had their tweets deleted during the 2020 Democrat primaries when they were complaining about irregularities in the process which hurt Bernie Sanders.

It’s time for the remnants of the old left to give up their childish obsession with free healthcare and the boogiemen of racism and sexism, and get on board with the far-right agenda for the big win-win against the global financial elite.

About four times annually, Emmanuel Macron just pops out with something that blows your mind, one way or the other.

I used to think that if I was French, these things would not phase me. But apparently, the French are being phased.

Daily Mail:

Politicians, prominent intellectuals, and academics in France have voiced concern that ‘out-of-control leftism and cancel culture’ from the United States is threatening French identity.

They are arguing that American ideas on race, gender, post-colonialism – especially those coming from U.S. universities – are undermining French society and are an attack on French heritage.

The collection of intellectuals arguing that France is being contaminated by the leftism of America was buoyed on last year after French President Emmanuel Macron appeared to side with them.

In a speech in October on the ‘Fight against Separatism’, Macron warned against leaving ‘the intellectual debate to others’ as he cautioned of the ‘certain social science theories entirely imported from the United States’.

His education minister Jean-Michel Blanquer also warned in October that there is a ‘battle to wage against an intellectual matrix from American universities’.

The debate came to a head this week after the new director of the Paris Opera, Alexander Neef, released a 66-page report on diversity at the company in which he vowed to diversify staff and to ban blackface.

It came after five black members of the ballet company circulated an open letter among the Paris Opera’s 1,800 employees last summer, calling for greater diversity.

Neef was targeted for the decision by far-right leader Marine le Pen and by French newspaper Le Monde which said he ‘soaked up American culture for 10 years’ while he worked in Toronto.

I lol’d.

This month also saw the publication of a book by social scientists Stéphane Beaud and Gérard Noiriel in which they claimed that race is a ‘bulldozer’ that destroys other subjects.

They added to the New York Times that they did not believe race should not be studied as an academic subject in France, as the secular government does not recognize it.

It follows tension over protests against police violence last summer in France, sparked as they were in the U.S. by the death in police custody of George Floyd.

The wave of protests sparked further backlash in universities, as students began to put pressure on institutions to disinvite well-known speakers.

Activists also targeted a play at Sorbonne University where white actors were to wear masks and dark make up.

Yeah I mean, there is no way that anyone could ever explain French people protesting by the thousands against the cop who arrested George Floyd.

There is still no explanation as to what the Americans were protesting – the guy was swiftly arrested for the crime of arresting a multiple felon who was in the process of committing multiple crimes, who then subsequently died from a drug overdose.

Let me just tell you what this is: this is a situation where they are showing off that they can make people all over the world do anything they want them to do using this now completely pervasive digital communications apparatus.

Somehow, no one thinks to look at the thing that everyone is looking at 75% of their waking hours.

This is actually deforming women’s spines.

Furthermore, somehow no one notices that the only place this isn’t happening is where the American social media companies are banned.

Here’s how it goes:

Anglin: Look around this public place, what do you see?

Everyone: People.

Anglin: Right. What are they doing?

Everyone: Just standing, walking…

Anglin: What’s the other thing they’re doing?

Everyone: I dunno, breathing?

Anglin: The other thing.

Everyone: Ohhhh. The phone! Sure! But everyone does that.

Anglin: Yes, yes! What are they doing with the phone?

Everyone: They’re looking at it. Looking at the screen.

Anglin: Yes. Now here we are: what is on the screen?

No one:

There were two 1,000-year-old Jews in America. It’s not like the Highlander. There can be more than one, technically. But now, like the Highlander, there is only one.

America had two 1000-year-old Jews. One of them died today. The other appeared on Russian state television to say that the Capitol Storm was historically justifiable because America has failed to implement communism correctly.

RT:

The US public is fed a narrative that everything is “fundamentally wonderful” in the country, despite some hiccups; but in reality, serious problems plaguing the US are not acknowledged by the elites, Noam Chomsky told RT.

The US likes to see itself as an inherently good force always trying to correct its mistakes, and this approach is evident in how the January 6 Capitol Hill riot was covered, Chomsky told RT’s Chris Hedges. This perceived reality of neoliberal elites is not based on facts, the renowned thinker and co-author of the seminal book on media complicity in disastrous US policies, ‘Manufacturing Consent’.

“This assault on the Capitol shows the power of American democracy, ‘cause we didn’t collapse into a fascist state. And that enabled us to show that American democracy in its magnificence has triumphed,” he said, describing the prevailing narrative. Similar self-deceiving triumphalism gripped the US in the wake of the Watergate scandal.

But the reality is that there are “really serious ills” that neither of the two parties is willing to talk about, which makes it impossible to reflect on the causes of the Capitol disturbances.

“What’s being discussed is ‘a crazed mob’ as if they came out of nowhere. They didn’t come out of nowhere,” Chomsky said.

Here’s a second clip:

(The whole interview is somewhere in this 30-minute video right here.)

The similarities between the old left and the new right are that they have the same critique of modern “neoliberalism” (dumb word, really, but okay).

I can see how some people see this and say “well, what this guy is saying is right – we should ally with him.”

Unfortunately, there is virtually no overlap in the way of solutions to these problems.

However, that isn’t really that unfortunate, actually, because Noam Chomsky is turning 1,001 this year, and he’s not going to be around much longer, and Jimmy Dore is about to get banned from YouTube, and has no clear solution to that problem. Glenn Greenwald is just a rebellious homosexual Jew who enjoys saying things that are contrary to the establishment (identical motivation to a neo-Nazi, in fact, just in the reverse – neo-Nazis rebel against normal white people by siding with Jews, while Greenwald rebels against Jews by siding with normal white people).

Ultimately, at the end of the day, the neo-Nazi goes home and chugs bottles of ranch dressing, whilst Glenn Greenwald goes home and does… whatever exactly it is that homosexual couples do with their “adopted” male children (it’s one of the fundamental mysteries of life, but most people speculate that they play board games and watch old sitcoms together, such as Green Acres or I Dream of Jeannie).

Noam Chomsky is so old he isn’t relevant to anything. And I have never met a single person who follows Jimmy Dore or Glenn Greenwald who isn’t a right-winger, parading around their “based leftist” like Republicans parade around their “based black guys.”

Listen to these leftists, whatever, that’s fine. I would listen to Jimmy Dore sometimes if he didn’t have such a filthy mouth. But don’t delude yourself into thinking there is some body of white or white-aligned nonwhites who even share this critique, let alone any overlap at all in solutions. This leads to some of the dumbest bullshit I’ve ever seen on the internet – “oh, well, we could give them some socialist policies if they agreed to deport the immigrants.” That is QAnon level thinking, and anyone entertaining it should be ashamed of himself.

(By the way, I don’t blame RT for interviewing Chomsky. I would interview Chomsky. He says some interesting things, and he’s a historical relic. But you know – let’s stay connected to reality here about the implications.)

(By the other way, as far as I can tell, King never interviewed Chomsky. I obviously had the idea to look, and thought there was maybe a 15% chance that he had at one point done that. But he didn’t. It’s a shame. They should have done the interview last week, when it would have been most relevant.)

I found some liberal cartoons from a couple years ago that really confused me because they are so accurate. The artist is one Jen Sorensen, who I assume is a lesbian. She looks like a haggard 14-year-old boy with debilitating alcoholism.

They’re apparently supposed to be making fun of conservatives, but they’re just showing people saying the TRUTH.

Whose life wouldn’t be better without those things? This is the epitome of “wow just wow,” given that there is no attempt to hint at why anyone would be interested in supporting things on this list, or how they help anyone.

How is it possible that communists are not interested in the unequal distribution of the most sought after resource in the modern era, which is vagina? Why should women be able to form a mafia to regulate the distribution of sex? The way women manage this resource and use scarcity to oppress the masses is directly out of Karl Marx’s nightmare of capitalism.

In fact, following Marxist logic, incels should be seizing the means of reproduction and distributing it with equity, i.e., kidnapping women and awarding them to men as sex slaves. Incels are the single most oppressed group of people on earth, and they deserve to be liberated.

I just can’t hardly believe that a far-leftist would use the term “unfair distribution” when attempting to satirize the views of her opponent.

Jen Sorensen is still making cartoons. Here’s the collection. They’re pretty much all really terrible.

This one got me though:

I don’t think anyone in America is trying to cut down forests, but “Alt-Smokey” is good.

Space alien, black female genius who can do anything, Jew, homosexual white male, fat white female

Earlier this week I wrote that white leftists do not have actual ideas, and simply push whatever they are told by the establishment is the morally good position.

But let us consider for a moment that they do have a vision for the future, and that they are actually pushing something coherent.

What are they actually talking about doing?

• Completely abolishing the traditional family while also creating “new families” that are proven to be unstable, thus turning everyone into isolated individuals
• Training children to engage in various types of “new sex,” which often involve mutilation of their endocrine systems and genitalia
• Creating a world where everyone is sexually unique, and has sex with all different types of men and women of various ages and with various “gender identities”
• Shutting down all current industry in the first world in order to stop global warming and replacing it with “green” industry that doesn’t exist now but will theoretically be invented in the future
• Outlawing all forms of speech, globally, that questions any part of the agenda
• Provoking Russia into some type of world war to get the last white country on board with the program
• Allowing the entire population of the third world to flood into first world countries
• Requiring the white population of these countries to pay for the incoming third world populations and subsidize their breeding
• Creating a world government
• White people eventually being replaced completely by a mixed race brown population under the new world government
• Everyone on earth defining their identity by their consumer habits and sexual behaviors
• An endless stream of Marvel Comics movies
• Islam is somehow integrated into all of this
• The entire universally equal global brown/tranny/Islamic/communist population creates a futuristic society that travels into outer space

Clearly, I understand this better than they do, because I’ve not seen a single one of them come out with a bullet point list like this of their vision. But looking at what they are promoting, there is no other possible explanation for what their vision is.

It is cartoonish, and it is highly abrasive to see adults pushing for this sort of thing.

Part of the problem that right-wingers have in dealing with the left is that this is all so silly. The right tends to be much more intellectual than the left, and we’re looking at the ultimate ends that their policies will lead to while they aren’t even aware of the absurdity of what they are promoting.

So when we say “No, wait, hold on, let’s think for a second about where this will go,” they say, “No, you’re evil! You’re bad! You don’t deserve to be able to speak! You’re a Nazi and we’re gonna punch you!”

There isn’t any room for any kind of discussion about any of this with these people.

I personally don’t care about free healthcare, free college, free whatever. I’m totally willing to negotiate on any of that. But the idea that you can combine that with total global open borders with the entire third world and all of this weird sexual stuff, and then shove Islam into the mix as well, is just fundamentally insane.

These people are all taught “no platform for Nazis” because it is self-evident that they can’t discuss any of this or even begin to explain where their own positions are supposed to lead the world.

On the recommendation of many people on the far-right, I’ve been watching Jimmy Dore’s far-left YouTube show.

I think it is very informative, generally, and I see why people on the far-right like it. It is legitimately anti-war and legitimately anti-globalism, and they call-out a lot of nonsense on the mainstream neo-liberal left, such as the Russian conspiracy hoax. He is also anti-Israel.

He’s more hostile to the Democrat Party than he is to Donald Trump.

That’s all fine.

As far as my own agenda goes, I could care less about whether or not some future government gives everyone free healthcare and college. That is not even on my list of concerns, or something that I ever think about.

I don’t even care about this green energy stuff or the global warming hoax. Obviously, the Ocasio-Cortez plan is insane and impossible, but some form of that which doesn’t shut down all electricity is fine with me. Whatever.

All things being equal, I would be open to agreeing to give leftists these things, if they agreed to be against immigration and homosexuality on a shared platform. They’re already more or less against the Jews, so there is certainly room to come together under a populist, people’s platform.

But here’s the thing. 

As much as people want to talk about how “left” and “right” don’t really exist, they actually do exist. The left is feminine and the right is masculine. That is why you have mass immigration coupled with socialism – these are both feminine.

The female and the feminine male are emotionally driven, and thus want to save all the poor brown people that the TV says need a big white nanny to come save them from themselves. They want to protect anal perverts, who they are told are being oppressed and abused. They are easily swayed by environmentalist propaganda that says the world will end if they keep driving a car.

The female and the feminine male are also weak and want someone else to take care of them, so they want free healthcare. They want to be given whatever they can be given by the state.

Viewing immigrants as competitors rather than friends is masculine. Just as it is masculine to want to work and pay for your own things.

There have been multiple studies showing that the less muscle mass you have, the more likely you are to support socialism.

Any talk about wanting healthcare at all is actually feminine. Men who are not obese tend to not go to the doctor, until they are elderly and their testosterone is dropping. Because it is generally humiliating to go to the doctor and have some other man – or a woman – care for your body.

I think it would be easy enough for most people on the far-right to say what I have said: that the socialist stuff doesn’t really matter if we are able to get through an anti-Jew, anti-immigrant, anti-homo, anti-feminist agenda. Furthermore, on a few of the issues, such as the role of billionaires and mutlinational corporations in society, the leftists are more on point than most right-wingers. But none of the weak men who have committed themselves to socialism are going to give up their love for weakness in order to accomplish their socialist goals.

That is part and parcel of being a weak, pathetic being.

You saw this fact on full display with the recent event involving Tucker Carlson interviewing that Dutch socialist, Rutger Bregman.

Watch Fox News host Tucker Carlson call one of his guests a 'tiny brain…moron' during an interview. NowThis has obtained the full segment with historian Rutger Bregman that Fox News is refusing to air. pic.twitter.com/kERYPUaGLY

— NowThis (@nowthisnews) February 20, 2019

Tucker invited this guy on to spread his socialist message, but it was more important to the Dutch fag to attack Tucker in defense of immigrants than to spread his message about taxing billionaires.

Furthermore, the faggot didn’t even know who Tucker was. He didn’t know any of his positions. He seemed to be attacking him as if he was Sean Hannity. Tucker has never been pro-billionaire. Maybe he was ten years ago, I don’t really know, but he hasn’t held that position since he has had this show on Fox.

And I actually do agree with Tucker’s agenda to establish a third position by combining social conservatism with progressive-type economics.

It is clear that pure free market capitalism is no longer a sustainable system in the long run, because everything is going to be run by robots, and labor itself will have little or no value. There isn’t really any choice here other than a total restructuring of the economy. I don’t think that free government healthcare – and certainly not free college – is an especially important issue there, but the general claim that capitalism is becoming increasingly nonviable is self-evident.

This doesn’t mean “so socialism then,” but rather that every aspect of the economy is going to need to be rethought without the influence of previous ideologies in order to create a new system that works for the people.

I think Tucker will be able to attract normal working and middle class people who have historically identified with the left with his heresies against the free market, and he will have no problem keeping normal people who identify as conservative, as they are more concerned with social issues.

But it is only normal people who are ever going to be attracted to any of this, and they will only be attracted to it for practical reasons. Ideology-driven leftists are never going to give up their obsession with brown people, feminism and sodomy.

I didn’t think they were going to call “racism” on Permit Patty, but they did.

She is so obviously a normal fat white liberal who just hit a breaking point with the niggers and snapped, just wanting this annoying little bitch off the street.

So my little cousin was selling water and didn't have a permit so this lady decided to call the cops on an 8 year old. #PermitPatty pic.twitter.com/SiL61pnAgl

— Racist Raj 🌹 (@_ethiopiangold) June 23, 2018

Patty was a weed chief.

This could have happened to literally any libshit.

And this whole thing of witch hunting normal people is such bad, bad strategy. They are pushing for full polarization and it just is not the correct move for them right now.

CBS News:

The woman dubbed “Permit Patty” for threatening to call police on an 8-year-old black girl selling water on the street has stepped down as CEO of her cannabis company. CBS Los Angeles reports the move follows a massive online backlash that resulted in her products getting dropped by other marijuana sellers.

Several Bay Area dispensaries are now refusing to sell products made by Alison Ettel’s company TreatWell Health, The San Francisco Chronicle reported Tuesday.

“It is Ms. Ettel’s belief that TreatWell, its employees and patients should not have to suffer because of a situation that occurred in an escalated moment,” company spokeswoman Cynthia Gonzalez is quoted as saying in the paper.

It’s almost as if there is literally no place left on the left for whites. At all.

At least three marijuana dispensaries stated publicly they would stop selling TreatWell products.

“I forgot to mention that we had pulled [TreatWell’s] product line as soon as we saw the video,” said the manager of one San Francisco store. “We do not support that type of behavior!”

TreatWell sells pain-easing “cannabis-based tinctures in different ratios for humans and pets,” The Los Angeles Times reported last year.

The producer of “Lady Buds,” an upcoming documentary on women in the legal cannabis industry, said Ettel would no longer be part of the project.

Before her resignation, Permit Patty did an interview talking about how she was being manipulated.

There is nothing at all unreasonable about anything she is saying. It is of course “racist,” however, because only niggers would be doing what these niggers were doing.

But I just don’t even see what they are trying to do with this whole public execution of random people from cellphone videos.

Well, I do see what they’re trying to do – they’re trying to make examples of any white person who steps out of line, to enforce a strict regime of extreme compliance to extremist new social norms.

But the thing is, there is this guy who is like “I’m sick of this, if you’re sick of it you can come stand with me and we’ll stop it.”

He’s been getting a lot of traction, this guy.

When other libshits see one of their own being thrown under the bus and having her entire life destroyed for doing something that any of them could have done in a moment of frustration, it seems to me that it makes them a whole lot more likely to hold their breath and check red on a secret ballot.

At this point though, it isn’t really even a strategy. This is a machine that has been put into gear. The media simply assumed “oh well of course we have to destroy this woman.”

It’s… looking really, really rough for the left.

We appear to be watching them bury themselves alive in real time.

Governor Jerry Brown has been in the news a lot lately over the National Guard at the border thing.

Trump’s been praising/condemning him.

California Governor Jerry Brown is doing the right thing and sending the National Guard to the Border. Thank you Jerry, good move for the safety of our Country!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 12, 2018

Looks like Jerry Brown and California are not looking for safety and security along their very porous Border. He cannot come to terms for the National Guard to patrol and protect the Border. The high crime rate will only get higher. Much wanted Wall in San Diego already started!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 17, 2018

There is a Revolution going on in California. Soooo many Sanctuary areas want OUT of this ridiculous, crime infested & breeding concept. Jerry Brown is trying to back out of the National Guard at the Border, but the people of the State are not happy. Want Security & Safety NOW!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 18, 2018

Every time I think of Jerry Brown, I think of that Dead Kennedys song “California Über Alles.”

It was written in the 70s, the first time Jerry Brown was governor of the Golden State.

Which actually could basically pass as right-wing right now.

And that is… pretty bizarre.

I am Governor Jerry Brown
My aura smiles and never frowns
Soon I will be president

Carter power will soon go ‘way
I will be Führer one day
I will command all of you
Your kids will meditate in school
Your kids will meditate in school

California Über Alles
California Über Alles
Über Alles California
Über Alles California

Zen fascists will control you
Hundred percent natural
You will jog for the master race
And always wear the happy face
Close your eyes, can’t happen here
Big Bro’ on white horse is near
The hippies won’t come back, you say
Mellow out or you will pay
Mellow out or you will pay

California Über Alles
California Über Alles
Über Alles California
Über Alles California

Now it is nineteen eighty-four
Knock-knock at your front door
It’s the suede denim secret police
They have come for your uncool niece

Come quietly to the camp
You’d look nice as a drawstring lamp
Don’t you worry, it’s only a shower
For your clothes, here’s a pretty flower

Die on organic poison gas
Serpent’s egg’s already hatched
You will croak, you little clown
When you mess with President Brown
When you mess with President Brown

California Über Alles
California Über Alles
Über Alles California
Über Alles California

This was an extreme (old) leftist anarchist punk band who in the 70s envisioned a form of hippy totalitarianism arising in California.

Which, oddly enough, is exactly what happened.

Punk rock is interesting, because there was almost a right-wing element to it, or what would now be considered a right-wing element, in that it was opposed to hippies and overtly militant. There was also a concept of freedom that doesn’t exist in boomer hippy land which is embodied in that song.

“Holiday in Cambodia” was also somewhat telling of that particular ideology that developed in the post-hippy era.

They were mocking the boomer hippy obsession with communism, which was rightly seen as extremely authoritarian and oppressive and yet loved by people whose idea of a good time was taking acid and having anonymous sex in a mud puddle.

So you’ve been to school for a year or two
And you know you’ve seen it all
In daddy’s car thinkin’ you’ll go far
Back east your type don’t crawl
Play ethnicky jazz to parade your snazz
On your five grand stereo
Braggin’ that you know how the niggers feel cold
And the slums got so much soul

It’s time to taste what you most fear
Right Guard will not help you here
Brace yourself, my dear
Brace yourself, my dear

It’s a holiday in Cambodia
It’s tough, kid, but it’s life
It’s a holiday in Cambodia
Don’t forget to pack a wife

You’re a star-belly sneech, you suck like a leech
You want everyone to act like you
Kiss ass while you bitch so you can get rich
But your boss gets richer off you
Well you’ll work harder with a gun in your back
For a bowl of rice a day
Slave for soldiers till you starve
Then your head is skewered on a stake

Now you can go where people are one
Now you can go where they get things done
What you need, my son
What you need, my son:

Is a holiday in Cambodia
Where people dress in black
A holiday in Cambodia
Where you’ll kiss ass or crack

Pol Pot
Pol Pot
Pol Pot
Pol Pot
Pol Pot
Pol Pot

Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot
Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot

And it’s a holiday in Cambodia
Where you’ll do what you’re told
A holiday in Cambodia
Where the slums got so much soul
Pol Pot!

Pol Pot actually was probably a lot cooler than any single hippy.

At least that dude got shit done, ya know?

You can say what you want about how that turned out, but you can’t accuse the man of fucking around.

They say he committed a genocide, but evidence shows that a lot of jerk-offs were just trying to fuck up his shit so he took care of them, old school.

A lot of people don’t really know how to classify a guy who shows up and is like “yo, the days of fucking around just ended,” so they flip their shit and go around screeching about “muh genocide.”

But yeah, a leftist criticizing authoritarianism in the modern era is absolutely unheard of.

Dead Kennedy’s singer/songwriter Jello Biafra sort of ended up in a confused wasteland as the left switched from freedom-oriented left-libertarianism to state-mandated homosexuality.

Obviously, leftist ideas don’t actually work and they were never meant to work because they were invented by Jews as a way to tear down the old order and create a new one – the “freedom” that they sold was only about destroying everything. As soon as it was all destroyed, freedom no longer was on the list of priorities.

These old leftists are just confused.

You see it all the time now. They just look tired. I don’t think in the 60s or 70s anyone thought the ultimate end of their revolution would be injecting children with hormones and cutting their dicks off or establishing sharia law courts in western metropolises.

But that’s sort of how things go. If you don’t have solid, clear principles – that actually make sense and are based on something derived from the order of nature – you can end up in a situation that is totally different from the one you thought you were going into.

I personally blame the Jews.

Especially for all that punk rock shit, wow.