In an act epitomizing the establishment’s increasing desperation, a British court has sentenced patriot Joshua Bonehill to 3 years and four months in prison for posting an image of Le Happy Merchant in Auschwitz on Twitter.

BBC:

A far right activist who posted “vile, anti-Semitic material” online ahead of a planned neo-Nazi rally in London has been jailed for more than three years.

Earlier, Joshua Bonehill-Paine, 23, of Yeovil, was found guilty of inciting racial hatred at Southwark Crown Court.

He posted links to offensive material on Twitter in June before a rally planned in Golders Green, north London, an area with a large Jewish population.

The event was later moved and held in central London.
‘Free from fear’

Bonehill-Paine, who has described himself as “a rising star of the right-wing community” was arrested at his Yeovil home in Hudson Road on 26 June.

He was jailed for three years and four months and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £120 and £1,200 in court costs.

Det Ch Insp Andy Barnes of the Met Police, who led the investigation, said Bonehill-Paine “posted vile, anti-Semitic material online”.

As far as I can tell from presently available information (I’m working on getting more details), the entire sentence was for a single Twitter post:

This is absolutely insane.

It is the most extreme violation of free speech thus far. I would offer that it is even more outrageous than Ernst Zundel’s German sentence for Holocaust denial. At least in Zundel’s case, it was clear in German law that it was illegal to say the gas chambers are a hoax.

Bonehill’s case is entirely different. “Inciting racial hatred” is a purely nonsensical bit of litigious Jew gibberish. This could be applied to absolutely anything, so vague is the term. Any news outlet which reported on the Rotherham Paki sex trafficking scandal, for instance, could be charged with making people feel the emotion of hate for Pakis.

#FreeBonehill

We need a full-on Twitter-storm with the hashtag #FreeBonehill, and we need to spam the offending image. We also need to target whoever was responsible for this crucifixion. At present, I am not clear who it was, but I imagine John Mann (@JohnMannMP) was involved.

This is going to be a sustained campaign. We simply cannot allow this to remain low-profile, as the media is going to attempt to keep it. People have a right to know that the British government is sentencing people to insanely long prison sentences simply for questioning Jewish power on the internet.

If this can happen to one of us it can happen to all of us. We are all Joshua Bonehill.

The Jews and the establishment shills which protect them are entering a phase of complete desperation, as the internet is allowing millions of people to inform themselves about their subversive and terroristic behavior. This sentence is reckless, as it is so clearly insane to any normal individual.

We cannot live in a society where men are imprisoned for political speech which the establishment objects to.

We shall resist.

Hail Victory.

Following an extremely poor article about Le Happy Merchant (in which he inexplicably referred to the Merchant as “jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif), the Buzzfeed Jew Bernstein has written a less horrible article about Le American Bear (but maybe I’m biased here because he bothered to give me a mention and link, which most Jew articles don’t do even when they are talking about me).

All the pictures he used are from my post here.

He goes through and explains that Le American Bear is a evolutionary form of Spurdo Spärde, using the Know Your Meme explanation of who Spurdo is.  He claims it came from a leftist chan, which is not an actual thing.

The Jew this time, responding to our criticism, noted the actual name of our most favorite Jew:

Except for one thing. He’s the credulous foil to and perpetual victim of pro-Israel, anti-America conspiracies by “Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif” (the internet’s favorite anti-Semitic cartoon), and the White Supremacist internet absolutely loves him

However, this is wrong. He is not also called “Le Happy Merchant,” he is only called that. Shocked I am that such a highly visible site as Buzzfeed, which is a self-declared database on internet culture, is so out of the loop.

The Jew Bernstein then goes on to claim that we stupid Americans don’t understand that we are using a meme that was designed to make fun of us as if it was made to make fun of someone else. However, this again demonstrates a bizarre inability to grasp what is actually going on. Le American Bear is designed to mock what the Jews have done to Americans through their hundred year old program of Jewing us over.

Finally, to ensure the piece was saturated to the max with lies and falsehoods, the Jew claims he did not do 9/11.

A Jew named Bernstein who writes for Buzzfeed has written an entirely crappy article about Le Happy Merchant.  I am continually shocked not so much by the ridiculous content of these mainstream Jew websites, but by the low quality of the writing itself.

For whatever reason, the Jew Bernstein does not identify Le Happy Merchant as Le Happy Merchant, but instead calls him “Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif.”  He also claims “we” (unclear if he means the Jews, the Buzzfeed staff or if he refers to his own person as “we”) found the man who drew it, while in actual physical reality (as opposed to the Jew fantasy world), /pol/ figured out A. Wyatt Mann was Nick Bougas like four years ago.

He begins by mourning the reality of meme culture.

What is most significant about this image isn’t the thing itself — there is far more creative, and far more disturbing, anti-Jewish imagery out there — but its sheer ubiquity. A Google reverse image search for “Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif,” as the file is most frequently, but not always, named, returns 1,210 matches. It’s unquestionably the most popular anti-Semitic image on the internet, and if one pauses to think about the scope and reach of the internet, it’s easy to make an argument that “Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif” is the most widely seen anti-Semitic image in history.

So where did it come from, and how is it used?

The drawing has become a mainstay not just of the internet presence of political causes that are sometimes or usually anti-Semitic in their rhetoric, but an established unit in the set of images that comprises the visual language of Reddit, and 4chan, and dozens of other internet fora. And just like every other unit in this set, from photographs and GIFs we find hilarious and adorable to those we find offensive and disgusting, it exists not just as a single image but as a template, a base model for more ornate iterations.

Indeed, the modifications of Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif are endless.

He does not attempt to explain why so many people hate the Jews and thus desire to mock them with this image. In fact, he spins it that “maybe they don’t really hate us” and “it’s just for shock value.”

Then the dumb Jew has to call up USHMM to find out if the picture was personally drawn by Adolf Hitler himself.

According to Judith Cohen, the chief photo archivist for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the image isn’t a Nazi Party caricature at all, though it does clearly bear the influence of Philipp Ruprecht, the Stürmer cartoonist who was sentenced to six years of hard labor after World War II for his work.

The rest of the stupid and boring article is just him going through making know-nothings think he is the World’s Greatest Jew Detective for having discovered Nick Bougas drew the Merchant, when the only detective work he would have had to do is go on /pol/ and ask someone, since everyone there has known this for years.

Funnily enough, he makes a point to go into Bougas’ motivations, deciding that most likely he was just a counter-culture guy opposed to political correctness, who didn’t really hate the Jews and want to see them rounded up and shipped to some gigantic concentration camp somewhere in Africa or Antarctica.

This is a theme I’m seeing more and more with these Jews.  Instead of pushing this “oy vey, we’re victims, everyone hates us and is trying to turn us into lampshades” business, they are opting instead for a “nah, people don’t really hate us, they just give us a hard time for laughs” approach.

If I had to guess, I would assert that we are witnessing the Jewish hive-mind catch on to the reality that when people hear of others hating the Jews they are no longer saying “oh you poor dear!  I’ll help you stop them from making you into a lampshade!”  And instead saying “yeah, all of these people do hate you, merchant.  I’m thinking that with so many people across the planet hating you, they probably have a reason.  What did you do?”

Idiot America is now the only country which still fully supports the Jewish terrorist state of Israel.

In 2012, a BBC poll showed that both America and Nigeria supported the gangster base of the parasite:

However, in 2013, the poll was done again, and Nigerians had changed their mind, leaving America as the only country supporting the mass-murdering Jewish criminal terrorists.

The poll indicates that Israel is the fourth least popular country in the world, presumably because it is filled with Jews and does nothing but cause wars and various other international crises.

The main reason that Americans support Israel is that they are our greatest ally and the only democracy in the Middle East.

Other countries dislike them because they are a criminal state hellbent on destroying the entire world for no reason, or maybe because they were holocausted six million times.

They also tend to ignore UN resolutions, which upsets the “international community.”

• Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (March 29, 1955) ‘condemns’ Israel for Gaza raid

• Resolution 111: The Palestine Question (January 19, 1956) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people”

• Resolution 127: The Palestine Question (January 22, 1958) ” … ‘recommends’ Israel suspends its ‘no-man’s zone’ in Jerusalem”.

• Resolution 162: The Palestine Question (April 11, 1961) ” … ‘urges’ Israel to comply with UN decisions”

• Resolution 171: The Palestine Question (April 9, 1962) ” … determines flagrant violations’ by Israel in its attack on Syria”

• Resolution 228: The Palestine Question (November 25, 1966) ” … ‘censures’ Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control”

• Resolution 237: Six Day War (June 14, 1967) ” … ‘urges’ Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees”. and called on Israel to ensure the safety and welfare of inhabitants of areas where fighting had taken place

• Resolution 248: (March 24, 1968) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan”

• Resolution 256: (August 16, 1968) ” … ‘condemns’ Israeli raids on Jordan as ‘flagrant violation”

• Resolution 258: (September 18, 1968) … expressed ‘concern’ with the welfare of the inhabitants of the Israeli-occupied territories, and requested a special representative to be sent to report on the implementation of Resolution 237, and that Israel cooperate

• Resolution 259: (September 27, 1968) ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation”

• Resolution 262: (December 31, 1968) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for attack on Beirut airport“

• Resolution 265: (April 1, 1969) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on Salt“

• Resolution 270: (August 26, 1969) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon”

• Resolution 279: (May 12, 1970) “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”

• Resolution 280: (May 19, 1970) ” … ‘condemns’ Israeli’s attacks against Lebanon”

• Resolution 285: (September 5, 1970) ” … ‘demands’ immediate Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon”

• Resolution 298: (September 25, 1971) ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s changing of the status of Jerusalem”

• Resolution 316: (June 26, 1972) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon”

• Resolution 317: (July 21, 1972) ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon”

• Resolution 332: (April 21, 1973) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel’s repeated attacks against Lebanon”

• Resolution 337: (August 15, 1973) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and for the forcible diversion and seizure of a Lebanese airliner from Lebanon’s air space”

• Resolution 347: (April 24, 1974)” … ‘condemns’ Israeli attacks on Lebanon”

• Resolution 444: (January 19, 1979) ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces”

• Resolution 446 (March 22, 1979): ‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a ‘serious obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”

• Resolution 450: (June 14, 1979) ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon”.

• Resolution 452: (July 20, 1979)   … ‘calls’ on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories”

• Resolution 465: (March 1, 1980) ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel’s settlements program”

• Resolution 467: (April 24, 1980) ” … ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s military intervention in Lebanon”

• Resolution 468: (May 8, 1980) ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return”

• Resolution 469: (May 20, 1980) ” … ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s failure to observe the council’s order not to deport Palestinians”

• Resolution 471: (June 5, 1980) ” … ‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”

• Resolution 478 (August 20, 1980): ‘censures (Israel) in the strongest terms’ for its claim to Jerusalem in its ‘Basic Law’

• Resolution 487: (June 19, 1981) ” … ‘strongly condemns’ Israel for its attack on Iraq’s nuclear facility”

• Resolution 497 (December 17, 1981), decides that Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan Heights is ‘null and void’ and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith

• Resolution 501: (February 25, 1982) ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops”.

• Resolution 515: (July 29, 1982) ” … ‘demands’ that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in”

• Resolution 516 (August 1, 1982) demanded an immediate cessation of military activities in Lebanon, noting violations of the cease-fire in Beirut

• Resolution 517: (August 4, 1982) ” … ‘censures’ Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon”.

• Resolution 520: (September 17, 1982) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel’s attack into West Beirut”.

• Resolution 573: (October 4, 1985) ” … ‘condemns’ Israel ‘vigorously’ for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters

• Resolution 592: (December 8, 1986) ” … ‘strongly deplores’ the killing of Palestinian students at Birzeit University by Israeli troops”

• Resolution 605: (December 22, 1987) ” … ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians

• Resolution 607: (January 5,  1988) ” … ‘calls’ on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention

• Resolution 608: (January 14, 1988) ” … ‘deeply regrets’ that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians”

• Resolution 611: (April 25, 1988) “… condemned Israel’s assassination of Khalil al-Wazir as a ‘flagrant violation of the Charter

• Resolution 636: (July 16, 989) ” … ‘deeply regrets’ Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians

• Resolution 641 (August 30, 1989): ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s continuing deportation of Palestinians

• Resolution 672 (October 12, 1990): ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for “violence against Palestinians” at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount

• Resolution 673 (October 24, 1990): ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the United Nations

• Resolution 681 (December 20, 1990): ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s resumption of the deportation of Palestinians

• Resolution 694 (May 24, 1991): ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return

• Resolution 726 (January 6. 1992): ” … ‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians

• Resolution 799 (December 18 , 1992): “. . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return

• Resolution 904 (March 18, 1994): Cave of the Patriarchs massacre

• Resolution 1322 (October 7, 2000) deplored Ariel Sharon‘s visit to the Temple Mount and the violence that followed

• Resolution 1435 (September 24, 2002) demanded an end to Israeli measures in and around Ramallah, and an Israeli withdrawal to positions held before September 2000

• Resolution 1544 (May 19, 2004) “…‘calls on’ Israel to respect its obligations under international humanitarian law, and insists, in particular, on its obligation not to undertake demolition of homes contrary to that law”

• Resolution 1860 (January 8, 2009) “…‘calls for’ an immediate, durable and fully respected ceasefire, leading to the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza; ‘calls for‘ the unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, including of food, fuel and medical treatment”

Some of these are funnier than others.  But they’re all pretty funny.  And factually accurate.