Stefan Smit

When someone says that blacks are violent and dangerous, blacks often engage in violence and threats to prove that they’re not violent and dangerous.

Likewise, when some white farmer accuses blacks of wanting to take his land and murder him, blacks build shacks in his land to prove that they don’t want to take his land and murder him to prove that they really don’t want to murder him.

This is normal black behavior.

Daily Mail:

South African wine merchant who spoke out against attacks on white farmers was found dead after being shot on Sunday night while dining with family and friends.

Stefan Smit, 62, had been openly critical of the threat of land grabs on his property – a large estate in Stellenbosch, Western Cape – South Africa’s most famous wine region.

It was a murder seemingly fuelled by a land dispute created when a squat straddling Smit’s Louisenhof Estate was set up, expanding into a vast settlement.

The farmer had previously complained about how citizens from a nearby township had begun erecting shacks at the back of his farm, culminating in him getting an injunction to prevent people from encroaching on his space.

Smit was killed when four men entered his vineyard through an unlocked back door and shot him dead. His wife and a family friend managed to survive the attack.

Pieter Haasbroek, a friend of Mr. Smit, told The New York Times: ‘They were busy eating dinner with friends when four masked men came into the house. They shot Smit dead. What we feared came true.’

The dispute over land has been ongoing and increasingly fractious, but police said it was too early to tell if Smit’s death was connected to that or a random murder.

Wait wait wait hold on.

“Random murder”?

Blacks in South Africa get together in groups of four and enter random houses at dinner to shoot random people for fun?

And they don’t shoot all the people having dinner, just one?

Who just so happens to be this man who spoke out about blacks taking white farmers’ lands?

Could be. It’s not hard to imagine blacks really do murder for fun (that’s what “random murder” means: murdering for fun) after observing what they do in Africa.

Did you know they even rape their own mothers?

Blacks love to murder and rape for fun.

The same dispute saw the murder of Annette Kennealy, 51, a farmer activist from Limpopo province who was beaten to death with a hammer and iron rod in late May.

Just another random killing totally unrelated to white farmers as a group and to the land grabs and farm attacks and stuff.

It’s just blacks being blacks, having a little bit of fun, killing a few people.

Ms Kennealy’s and Mr Smit’s murders comes as the government, led by Cyril Ramaphosa, pushes ahead with plans to alter South Africa’s constitution to allow land to be seized from farmers without having to compensate them.

…

Ramaphosa has said that his much-focused-on land reform is necessary to compensate for the ‘historical imbalance’ caused by apartheid and colonialism.

Here’s the thing: to say that colonialism and apartheid caused an imbalance of some kind, and to imply that the imbalance somehow caused blacks to be worse off than they’d have been without colonialism and apartheid, you’d need to have THE MISSING PIECE.

You know what THE MISSING PIECE is?

I’m talking about THE SMOKING GUN here.

You know what THE SMOKING GUN is?

I’ll tell you what it is.

Hold on.

Get ready.

Here it comes:

“WAKANDA”

Or any successful black country.

Or any non-shithole black country.

Or any non-chaotic black country.

Or any non-miserable black country.

Or any example of blacks being prosperous.

Or any example of blacks being able to run a country on their own.

There is no example of blacks being better off without white influence anywhere.

How can they even claim that there was an “imbalance” of some kind during apartheid and colonialism if they were worse off before colonialism than they were during and after it?

These shameless monkeys think that whites owe them something, and that somehow they lost stuff while interacting with whites.

These are blacks without whites:

As you can see, they don’t even have underwear.

These are blacks under the influence of whites:

Claiming that whites hurt blacks is insane.

Slavery didn’t hurt blacks.

Colonialism didn’t hurt blacks.

Apartheid didn’t hurt blacks.

On the contrary, interacting with whites has benefited blacks enormously. They’ve not only gained access to all of our inventions and the knowledge of our people for free, but they also regularly receive free stuff from us: vaccines, medical attention, money, technology, all kinds of gadgets and products and much more.

The groups of blacks that interacted the most with whites are the groups of blacks that are better off.

The more they interact with us, the better they are.

Blacks descended from the slaves brought to America are the most privileged blacks in the history of the world. There are no blacks better off than “African-Americans.”

In contrast, whites didn’t gain anything positive from interacting with blacks.

They ruin everything. Our schools, our cities, our neighborhoods, our economy, our pockets — everything.

But we’re supposed to feel guilty because someone allegedly forced them to work a couple of times in the past?

It’s insane.

Blacks should be paying reparations to us.

They should be doing something to repay everything that we’ve given them.

“You think we-ah danegeros? We’ah shown you you ray-cis bah kelin this sheep foh no reehson in fronno’you!”

Just another day in Negroland.

Cape Town will apparently lay charges against the sheep slaughterers.

TheIndependent:

Angry protesters have clashed on one of South Africa’s most popular beaches after private security guards allegedly ordered black visitors to leave.

The row erupted when the guards and police were called after reports that two teenage girls had been raped at the Cape Town attraction.

Black people appear to always be involved anywhere the word “rape” is used. If I were a racist, I’d say there’s an overwhelmingly high correlation between skin color and likeness to rape.

The guards, said to have been hired by local residents, were accused of clearing the Clifton 4th beach of all tourists.

Anti-racist demonstrators accused them of targeting black people.

Who else they’d target? Blacks are the most crime-committing, violent, and rapey species on the planet.

Do average white “males” seem like rapists to you?

They don’t even look capable of overpowering a woman.

But the row then escalated when the demonstrators staged a “cleansing ceremony” – slaughtering a sheep on the beach – and were challenged by mostly white animal welfare protesters.

I mean… yeah, it’s mostly white and creatures with some % of white genes that actually care about animals and the environment and all of that.

But what the fuck.

The security company denied closing down the beach, saying it was acting with police to protect residents from crime.

Cape Town’s mayor, Dan Plato, said the guards had asked people of all races to leave and had not targeted black people specifically.

The Black People’s National Crisis Committee, which arranged the protest march, said the beach clearing had echoes of South Africa’s apartheid era, when black and white people were segregated in public areas.

Yes, these South Apefricans don’t want apartheid because they don’t want to share. They want to kill all whites.

Police said preliminary findings indicated that no rape was registered but they had information suggesting there had been an attempt to sexually assault a 15-year-old girl, which was prevented by visitors.

Visitors, huh? Is that how we’re calling racists nowadays?

“The offering of the sheep is calling on our ancestors to respond to our trauma at the hands of white people over the years,” activist Chumani Maxwele told News24.

Black people are suffering a strange form of trauma that is transmitted genetically through generations. No other species or race suffers from that because no other species or race has ever suffered, and if they did, they obviously suffered less than blacks suffered in the hands of whites therefore blacks are the only ones affected.

I say we give them the password to the control room of their spaceship pyramids so they can start playing with the engines and re-learn how to travel the galaxy.

After all, they were kangs until we went to Africa, met them, deleted all trace of their greatness and proceeded to give them a constant stream of gibs and to share all of our achievements with them.

Would you rather use a shitty white man smartphone, enjoying the shitty security of the white man civilization and all of its technology, science, and medicine, or would you rather be a kang and travel through space in your pyramid-shaped spaceship?

Right. Now you got a taste of how awful we’ve made black people’s existence.

It’s time we give them back Wakanda.

“Everything you see here but my nigger ass has been made by the white people I’ll kill.”

Niggers have been genetically damaged by what happened centuries ago. They want to heal themselves by killing white people and taking their stuff. Healing gibs.

Daily Mail:

White South Africans could be forced to give up their own homes from next year as the nation’s government steamrolls through plans for land expropriation over claims ‘Africa’s original sin‘ must be reversed.

The National Assembly agreed to the establishment of a committee that will draft an amendment to section 25 of the Constitution – a law which will allow the government to take homes from the people – and refuse to pay them compensation.

As many in the nation see the move as retribution for the ‘original sin’ when decades ago black people were driven off their land, it is believed white farmers will be driven from their homes immediately.

Does anyone really believe white people will be “driven from their homes” and not get horribly murdered? Read this if you haven’t yet, especially the end.

Governing party The African National Congress (ANC) wants to amend the law so the government can take back land and distribute it.

However, critics say it is likely it will be handed off to their friends rather than dished out to those in need.

There’s no reason to think corruption will take place.

Last week the nations politicians fast tracked the set up of a committee which will write the legal change and present it next year.

The motion was adopted with 183 MPs voting yes, 77 voting no and no abstentions in fiery scenes as South Africans battle over land reform.

Economic Freedom Fighters politician Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi said those arguing against legalising land grabs are ‘beneficiaries of racism’.

‘Your time is up, white people,’ She added.

Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi.

White people?

Wasn’t this about farms and land?

The EFF will later put forward an amendment stating all land in private hands must be appropriated.

Democratic Alliance chief whip John Steenhuisen said the amendment is being pushed through without proper procedure.

‘What it (the passing of the motion) also says, very clearly, to the people of South Africa is that regardless of their submissions, this bill is a fait accompli (already decided),’ Steenhuisen said.

‘This is madness. The message it sends to the people of South Africa is ‘we don’t care what you say’.’

Democratic Alliance chief whip John Steenhuisen.

MP Sibusiso Mncwabe supported the adoption of the motion: ‘Let’s continue giving this Christmas gift (expropriation without compensation) to our people.’

Sibusiso Mncwabe.

A city outside Johannesburg is preparing what the mayor calls a ‘test case’ over plans to take hundreds of acres of land from private owners, without paying for it in order to build low-cost housing.

Low-cost housing designed by nigger engineers.

Last month, Ekurhuleni’s city council voted in favour of forging ahead with ‘expropriation without compensation’ – a legal tool that the ruling African National Congress says is necessary to provide land for disadvantaged black citizens.

Ramaphosa handed over the title deeds of 4,586 hectares of land to Chief Inkosi Mandla Mkwanazi of the KwaMkwanazi community in Empangeni, near Durban.

Who knows what are whites even doing right now in South Africa…

They can’t say they didn’t see all of this coming. Niggers have been talking about it for some time now.

Have white South Africans prepared? Do they even intend to fight back?

This isn’t just about land. Niggers want to kill all whites.

One could understand if they didn’t want to leave their land, and in that case, you’d expect them to at the very least be stockpiling weapons and ammo. There’s no sign of that.

Are they really idling while these daemons prepare to sacrifice them all?

A Polish MP, Slawomir Kopycinski, has come out and condemned the “Regulatory Commission for Jewish Communities,” a government body which gives free property to Jews who claim to be the heirs of “holocaust survivors.”

Kopycinski did not mince words, referring to the Jew plot as “the fourth partition of Poland,” referencing historical land-grabs by alien bodies.

JTA:

The Regulatory Commission for Jewish Communities was established in 1997 to return Jewish-owned property seized after World War II by Poland’s Communist government to its legal heirs.

“Based on the whims of several unknown men, the public buildings are returned to Jewish communities,” said Kopycinski at the press conference.

Piotr Kadlcik, president of the Union of Jewish Religious Communities in Poland, called Kopycinski’s statement “disgusting.”

“All cases are investigated and verified,” Kadlcik said in a statement Sunday. “Returning this property can hardly be called ‘a partition of Poland’ because the Jewish community is not an alien invader, but rather the citizens of the Republic of Poland, who have the same rights and responsibilities as everyone else.“

lol @ “the Jewish community is not an alien invader.” Sorry, Jew, that is a precise description of exactly what you are, and the Polish people know it.

Kopycinski is running for the European Parliament under the Europa Plus ticket.

Let’s hope he wins.

It has been discovered that under the grand new plan for peace in the Middle East, 80% of the illegal Jew settlements in Palestine will remain in place.  They number in the hundreds of thousands.

From the Telegraph:

Closely-guarded details of how Washington sees the terms of a final settlement were disclosed in a meeting between American Jewish leaders and Martin Indyk, a senior US official involved in the negotiations.

The framework envisages that the settlers, whose presence is viewed by the international community as an illegal incursion on Palestinian land, would remain where they were as part of a proposed land-swap deal with the Palestinians.

The deal would redraw borders so that some 80 per cent of settlers’ homes would be redesignated as being in Israel, while other parcels land would be handed back to Palestinian control.

So it will legalize what are now illegal settlements by expanding Israel’s borders, and thus Palestinians will no longer feel the shame of having illegal settlements in their lands.

What a great compromise.

Stun grenades, tear gas, flying rocks and a dispute over land – the scene might be familiar, but the players are less so. Used to running battles with Palestinians over territory, Israel is now facing opposition from another group of people who do not want to leave their homes: the Bedouin.

In northern Israel, a plan to remove tens of thousands of Bedouins from their ancestral villages and resettle them in specially designed towns is meeting resistance. Israel’s Bedouin do not want to move. And that is increasingly becoming a problem, not only for the Bedouin themselves, but also for the Israeli government, which is behind the unpopular plan.

The protests are getting bigger, and they are attracting more attention. Last Thursday, more than 1,000 largely Arab protesters, many of them bused in from towns and cities across the country, held demonstrations against the so-called “Prawer plan”, which, if implemented, will lead to the removal of between 40,000 and 70,000 – depending on who you ask – Bedouin from 35 of their traditional villages.

Wadi Ara, in Israel’s north, is a typical Arab-Israeli town. At least 500 flag-waving Palestinians, the vast majority of them young men and woman, gathered for a protest against the Prawer plan. After speeches in the local park, where the protesters held up signs reading “the new generation will surprise you” and “stop Prawer”, there were the inevitable clashes with security forces – who insisted they would not let the demonstrators reach and block the main road nearby.

Within minutes, onions – used to combat the effects of tear gas – were being thrown at the police, who responded by dragging individual protesters out of the crowd. The onions were soon replaced by glass bottles, rocks and fireworks.

“We have a legal right to be here,” said Eman Hanna, one of the protesters. “We are citizens of this country and have a permit to have the protest, and look, we’re being treated like the enemy. What sort of democracy is this?” Ms Hanna was later pushed back into the main crowd by a female police officer after refusing to step down from a small block to take photographs.

“Did you see that?” asked her friend, Fatima Birro, who had travelled from the coastal town of Jaffa for the demonstration. “Is this law to protest only available for Jews in this country? These people are lawyers and doctors and have a right to be heard. This is not a protest against the Jews, but this is my home too and the Prawer law is denying our right to be in our homes. We are being treated like second-class – no, fifth-class – people in our own land. It’s part of the process of the ethnic cleansings of the Arabs.” Firing stun grenades and tear gas, the police sent the protesters running for cover. After running into a local park, Rana Bishara, another protester wearing a T-shirt denouncing the Prawer law in English, Arabic and Hebrew, spoke of her opposition to the plan.

“They won’t even stop in a children’s park,” she said. “But why are we surprised? The law to remove the Bedouin, who have been there for thousands of years, is all part of the same policy of ethnically cleansing this land of the Arabs. It’s the same with the way the Palestinians are treated in the West Bank behind the Apartheid wall [the security barrier which divides the occupied West Bank and Israel] they built. Where are we supposed to go? They just want us to vanish. They think the new generation will simply forget what has happened, but we won’t.”

This protest, and similar ones in the Negev desert, came less than a week after John Kerry, along with Israeli and Palestinian negotiators, met for the first direct peace talks between the two sides. Although the demonstration was relatively tame and broke up without serious injury, the wider issue of the Bedouin and the Prawer plan is not likely to dissipate quite so quickly. Israel argues that the Prawer plan, which has been approved by ministers but not yet the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, offers the Bedouin the chance to live in recognised villages with modern infrastructure, and represents, the government claims, a compromise over land rights that have been in dispute since Israel was founded in 1948.

The Bedouin see it differently. They say the plan tramples over their rights pertaining to land they have lived on for generations and will lead to the destruction of existing villages, where they wish to stay. Israel considers the villages “unrecognised” and the inhabitants “trespassers on state land”, so it denies, say groups representing the Bedouin, citizens’ access to state infrastructure like water, electricity and sewage.

The Bedouin cause is attracting support not only from Israeli-Arab groups, but also from further afield. Last month, the United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, slammed the Israeli government for its policies towards the Bedouin. “As citizens of Israel, the Arab Bedouins are entitled to the same rights to property, housing and public services as any other group in Israel,” Ms Pillay said. “The government must recognise and respect the specific rights of its Bedouin communities, including recognition of Bedouin land ownership claims.

Read More