Yesterday, I reported on the curious fact that The Guardian was admitting that racists want no association with Dylann Storm Roof’s weird act. Today, as the shooting is beginning its slow exit from the news cycle, there are still no major news sites blaming internet racism for the shooting or calling for a witch-hunt against online haters.

Even while the Council of Conservative Citizens was mentioned by name in the killer’s manifesto, Kyle Rogers is getting minimal heat. The Daily Mail did a typically sensationalistic hit piece on him (where they state multiple times that he once referred to Michael Jackson as an ape), and the Daily Beast whined a bit. But that’s about it.

I’ve gotten a couple inquiries from the MSM, but I get those pretty regularly anyway.

There has been no gigantic media storm of “INTERNET HATE MACHINE EXPOSED.”

I have not seen a single news site calling for an end to free speech on the internet, which I had absolutely expected.

So, why not?

Presumably, the media has no desire to include us in their narrative at all, as it confuses the whole thing. If they talk to us, we are all just going to start listing off statistics about Black-on-White crime. If they link our sites, people are going to see endless lists of instances of Black-on-White crime. Merely acknowledging that we exist is more than they are able to do.

You’ll recall that during Operation: Filthy Jew Bitch the entire media simply referred to us as “an American White supremacist website.” We were never directly linked or even named by any major outlet (save one Jewish paper), even as dozens of articles were written on our operation.

They don’t want people to know who we are because what we are saying makes too much sense, even if people are shown our ideas through a story about a mass-murderer who allegedly subscribed to our ideology.

What It Means

This absolutely shows how much the media fears us. It would have been good if they had come down on us, as few in America actually supporting shutting the bitch down, and we would have at least got the chance to get our message out there after denouncing the shooting.

It also seems to indicate that this Roof shooting was not some sort of psy-op conspiracy, and that the manifesto is real. If this had been the case (and I must admit, I did entertain the idea), the media would have immediately jumped down our throats and demanded censorship of the internet. Instead, they aren’t even mentioning us at all, and simply trying to portray Roof as a typical White person.

I don’t think the story is going to get anywhere near the traction that these cop-killings get, at all, because it is so obvious the guy is drugged-out and not connected to or endorsed by anyone. The only thing they can do is keep saying it means Whites are evil and Blacks are oppressed – there is no massive conspiracy to allege, as they have chosen not to allege a massive conspiracy against internet hatred.

This story is already dying out of the news cycle. No one really knows what to do with it.

Probably, this will be slightly remembered, and when we get press in the future they will say “they believe like that drug guy who killed those old women while they were praying in a church.”

But that’s about it.

Jeez, I feel like a black or a Jew, what with these hurt feelings I have right now.

The Jewish disinformation outlet, Salon, has credited the Council of Conservative Citizens, and not the Daily Stormer, with bringing the racist hatred against the black debaters of CEDA in a hilarious article called

“I was hurt”: How white elite racism invaded a college debate championship:

The Council of Conservative Citizens, a contemporary iteration of the racist White Citizens Councils of eras past, penned an article called “Black female debate team wins national tournament to make up for white privilege.” The Council of Conservative Citizens appears on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of racist hate groups. The Daily Caller accused the “far left” judges who voted for these women of destroying college debate clubs via false accusations of racism.

With due respect to Kyle Rogers – who runs one of my absolute favorite websites on the internet, a site which we regularly feature articles from here on the Daily Stormer – our article on the chimping chimps was published on the 21st of April, while the CofCC article on the topic was published on the 22nd.

I would also like to make it clear that my article was inflammatory and specifically written for the purpose of inciting racial hatred and hurting the feelings of these dumb black destroyers of civilization, while the CofCC piece was much more moderate.

Oh, and what makes it even worse is that Salon did CofCC the favor of putting a direct link to their site in the article!  Remember that time the Jew Kirchick at the Daily Beast attacked me and didn’t even put a link to the site?

Ah bin upat dis idernit rassism gaym, but ah jis caint gisahed.

Notes:

This is tongue-in-cheek.  CofCC is actually one of the only White-oriented websites to which I am willing to give my full support.

Kyle Rogers woke up in an ambulance Sunday morning, completely unaware of the random attack that put him there.

The 23-year-old man and his parents then investigated, eventually tracking down surveillance video showing a man running up to Rogers and sucker-punching him before walking off.

Rogers, who broke his jaw and suffered facial lacerations, told CBS 2′s Jessica Schneider he’s positive he was a victim of a “knockout game” attack.

“I’m defenseless,” said Rogers, whose mouth is wired shut. “It’s one thing if he was looking me in the face, like squaring up, but, come on, from behind? It’s like a coward move.”

Police released the surveillance video Thursday and are asking for the public’s help in tracking down the suspect, described as a black man in his 20s.

Rogers had just left his friends at a bar on Spring Street and was walking north on the Bowery when the attack occurred around 2:30 a.m. Sunday. He was knocked unconscious and taken to Bellevue Hospital.

“I guess when I fell and hit the ground, I split this open, my eyebrow, and my chin from the punch,” he said of his injuries.

Rogers said he didn’t know his attacker and his assailant didn’t say anything to him before punching him.

The attack had locals talking Thursday.

“It’s the middle of the city, there are crazy people running around everywhere, and when you’re walking around late at night, you just have to keep your head on a swivel and keep an eye on your surroundings,” said Jeff Wolinsky, of Sunnyside, Queens.

“I live in this neighborhood and people can be crazy, but it doesn’t make me nervous to be out and about,” one woman told Schneider. “It’s sad.”

Some New Yorkers said they take precautions when walking around at night.

“It’s a scary thing because I don’t live in this neighborhood. I go to school here, so I just always travel in a group or something usually,” said Talia Smith, of Park Slope, Brooklyn.

Rogers and his family are making a plea to find the man who attacked him. They also want anyone involved in any of the “knockout game” attacks that flared up around the city late last year to understand that the pain and consequences are real. In the game, participants punch unsuspecting strangers for kicks.

“I just want these kids to stop,” said Kyle’s father, Michael Rogers. “I want them to understand that it’s not a game. That’s the whole thing. They call it a game, and it’s not a game. People get hurt real bad.”

Anyone with information is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 800-577-TIPS. The public can also submit their tips by logging onto Crime Stoppers’ website or by texting their tips to CRIMES (274637), then enter TIP577.

Kyle Rogers
CofCC
November 27, 2013

Daily Beast, Slate, Think Progress, and more other far-left news site all published articles claiming that black racial mob violence is a myth.

The extreme far-left staff at Daily Beast wrote that so-called “knockout game” violence by black mobs is “overblown panic over a crime wave that doesn’t exist.”

I guess this is why Daily Beast is losing millions of dollars per year. If your going to write fake news, it has to be really funny for people to actually want to read it.

Another high profile far-left website, Slate.com, wrote that black racial mob violence is “a myth.” They attacked the “right-wing media” for perpetrating this alleged myth.

Think Progress, which is run by a former Obama White House staffer, also joined in. That website claimed that black racial mob violence “might not be real.”

Actually, Think Progress published one element of the truth.

This website has repeatedly reported that the term “knockout game” started as a euphemism for black hate crime violence by the St. Louis, MO area media. The term “knockout game” was used to conceal the racial nature of the attacks. It was one of numerous regional euphemisms used by left-leaning reporters. In Philadelphia, media has commonly called it “flash mobs.” In England, the media has commonly called it “happy slapping.” In New York City, it has been called “wilding.” Using the phrase “attempted robbery,” is another common euphemism used by media all over the country to conceal black racial violence.

Think Progress correctly identifies the St. Louis media as creating the term “knockout game.” However, this is where they fly off the rails. Think Progress claims that “conservative” and “racist” websites popularized the term. In reality, the websites Think Progress is referring to have been fighting the media’s use of euphemisms such as “knockout game.”

We have been telling you straight up that the attacks are racially motivated mob violence by young blacks targeting non-blacks, especially whites. Think Progress flips reality upside down.

Think Progress claims conservatives are attributing values to the “knockout game” to distort public perception of the crimes. In reality, “knockout game” was coined as a propaganda euphemism by left-wing reporters to distort public perception of the crime! Conservatives are trying to strip off the layers of media propaganda.

What Think Progress, Daily Beast, and Slate are doing is tantamount to libel against the victims of black racial mob violence. This is no different that falsely claiming that a war crime never happened, because you support the party or ideology that perpetrated the war crime.

Each year the ADL conducts a poll and then claims the poll is proof of persistent hard-core “anti-Semitism” in the United States. Each poll is transparently disingenuous. It uses very vague questions that could be answered multiple ways, for multiple reasons. None of the results constitute any real evidence of “anti-Semitism.”

The latest poll, released Friday, included questions about Jews and the economy.

Fourteen percent (14%) agreed with the statement that “Jews have too much power in the U.S. today” (unchanged from 2011).

Nineteen percent (19%) of Americans believe Jews have too much power in the business world, nearly unchanged from the 20 percent who agreed with this statement in 2011.

Seventeen percent (17%) say that Jews have too much control on Wall Street, a slight decline from 19 percent answering “true” to that statement in 2011.

The ADL has been lampooned and mocked in Israel media outlets and the LA Times for making claims that are the exact opposite of what the overall Jewish media prints. While most Jewish publications and groups like to boast of Jewish accomplishments, the ADL claims that it is hateful and “anti-Semitic” to say that Jews disproportionately own or influence anything.

The Jewish media routinely makes statements that, according to the claims made Friday by the ADL, would constitute hard-core “anti-Semitism.”

Take for example this headline from the Jewish Daily Forward last February.

Meet the Four Jews Shaping the U.S. Economy

This could sound like yet another bad-taste Oscar night joke, but turns out that the U.S. economy is run by Jews.

Well, at least the federal government’s top advisers.

On Wednesday, the Senate confirmed the nomination of Jack Lew, an Orthodox Jew, as Treasury Secretary. He will joined by Gene Sperling, director of the National Economic Council at the White House, Alan Krueger, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, and Jeffrey Zients, who heads the Office of Management and Budget. All are Members of the Tribe.

Why isn’t the ADL denouncing the Jewish Daily Forward as an “anti-Semitic rag?”

This year, the unveiling of the ADL poll was even more absurd than ever before. The poll including this question.

Thirty percent (30%) of Americans continue to say that American Jews are “more loyal to Israel” than to their own country, America (unchanged from 2011 and 1964).

According to the ADL it is “anti-Semitic” to characterize Jews as being more pro-Israel than pro-America. Yet hours after releasing the poll, ADL head Abe Foxman gave a speech in which he was clearly calling for a more pro-Israel US foreign policy. He attacked Obama and both political parties for the lack of bombs raining down on Israel’s enemies. Foxman clearly showed that he advocates putting Israeli interests ahead of US interests. Foxman seemed to be insinuating that America should be Israel’s personal attack dog in the Middle East. So if Foxman claims that it is “anti-Semitic” to characterize Jews as “Israel Firsters,” and Foxman is a Jewish “Israel Firster,” what does that make Foxman? A complete hypocrite? A total fraud?