The on-going situation in Ukraine illustrates the unbelievable insanity originating from Washington DC.  The U.S. State Department for whatever reason thought that it would be a good idea to spend billions of dollars to finance a coup in Ukraine to help fulfill their never ending quest for world domination.  This is a country that was once part of the Soviet Union and shares a border with Russia.  This is right in Russia’s backyard and with anti-Russian and ultranationalist groups filling the power vacuum in Kiev, these developments represent a direct security threat to the Russian people.  This has prompted Russia’s President Vladimir Putin to send military forces into the Crimean peninsula. This is an area in Ukraine largely populated by Russian speakers and is also home to an important Russian military base.  The propaganda from the Zionist run American media and the nonsensical rhetoric coming from the Obama regime are nothing but delusional lies.  They’re now trying to paint Putin as an evil aggressor who hates freedom when this whole mess was caused directly by American arrogance.  They have now created an incredibly dangerous situation that could potentially lead to war with Russia.  Of course the Zionists in the Obama regime who have been primarily responsible for creating this mess don’t seem to care.  In fact, they are escalating their rhetoric against Russia.

To illustrate the madness that we are dealing with, look at what current U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry had to say about the situation on the CBS television program “Face the Nation.”

“You just don’t in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text.”

How stupid does this guy think everyone is?  This past August Kerry was trying to justify American military strikes against Syria using what could be easily described as a completely trumped up pre-text.  He claimed that Syria’s President Bashar Al-Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people citing highly questionable evidence.  In fact, there was more evidence indicating that Islamic fanatics fighting against the Assad government had used chemical weapons.  It is absolutely comical that Kerry is now openly criticizing the Russians for what he was guilty of trying to do just a few months ago.

Kerry has even criticized ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych for the luxurious lifestyle he was leading.  This is ridiculous considering that Kerry is a multi-millionaire who married into the wealthy Heinz ketchup family.  While he was a Senator, he was consistently ranked as one of the wealthiest members of Congress.

How can anyone in the world take this hypocrite seriously when he makes such statements?  Kerry has proven on multiple occasions that he is a joke but these recent comments make him the world’s laughing stock.  It is an absolute embarrassment that this clown is in charge of American foreign policy.

Besides the idiotic statements from Kerry, the Obama regime has even resorted to accusing Russia of interfering in Ukraine’s internal affairs and violating their sovereignty.  This once again represents more American hypocrisy since the United States has been interfering in Ukraine’s internal affairs all along.  The Russian military move has been in response to the American financed coup which has destabilized the country.  It is laughable that Obama and his cronies act as if they’ve done nothing to provoke this response.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State and Zionist Jew Victoria Nuland is on video stating that they spent billions of dollars to finance everything that’s happened in Ukraine.  She was even caught on a wiretap scheming about how they would put particular people in power.  In fact the very person she wanted to become Ukraine’s Prime Minister a Jewish banker named Arseniy Yatsenyuk with close ties to institutions of Western power has become Prime Minister.  It is not a surprise that Yatsenyuk is immediately leading an effort to secure a multi-billion dollar loan from the International Monetary Fund.  He’s literally delivering Ukraine right into the hands of central bankers.  Historically speaking, IMF loans have never been good for the general population of a country that receives them.  Either way, these events prove conclusively that this entire operation has been about the United States imposing its will on the Ukrainian people.  Any nonsense about spreading freedom and democracy was just a cover story for this intervention.

Obama himself has laughably claimed that there would be consequences for Russia’s military action.  One of the supposed consequences is that Russia might find itself excluded from the G8.  Why would Russia care if they are excluded from that?  The G8 has no power.  It is nothing more than a conference where world leaders listen to speeches and socialize.

There’s also been talk from the Obama regime that they may try to apply sanctions against Russia which is an obvious non-starter.  The member nations of the European Union rely heavily upon natural resources that come from Russia.  The EU economy is already in bad shape and would not be able to sustain itself if they lost Russia as a trading partner.  Not only that, but how likely is it that German Chancellor Angela Merkel would go along with sanctions considering that the United States was spying on her communications?  If the United States attempts to apply sanctions on Russia, they are going to have an awfully hard time finding support from European allies.

We even see the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power claiming Russian aggression and how they are responding to an imaginary threat.  Perhaps she has been living in a cave for the past decade but since September 11^th, 2001 all the United States has done is invent imaginary threats and invade countries based on a threat that they created or made up.  Of course when Russia responds militarily to a situation that is happening right along their national border, she criticizes them.  This is completely ridiculous considering all of the insane military misadventures America has involved itself in.  The hypocrisy is blatantly obvious.

We could argue back and forth trying to figure out if this is the result of these people’s insanity or their stupidity.  It actually could be a combination of both but in the end it probably doesn’t matter all that much.  They are so arrogant and filled with narcissism that they would probably prefer to have war than admit that they were wrong.

We must also ask the following question.  Why is it that the United States has Zionist Jews in key positions of power responsible for making these major foreign policy decisions?  Nuland, Kerry and the newly anointed Ukrainian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk all have Jewish lineage of some type.  Then we have Power who is married to Cass Sunstein another Zionist Jew who has endorsed government infiltration of the alternative media.  Who are these people working for any way?  It appears as if they all primarily represent the best interests of Israel and the larger concept of international Zionism through their actions and statements.  Financing this Ukrainian coup has done nothing for the United States and has further ruined its standing around the world.  These people should be fired for their support of such a boneheaded foreign policy.

The United States needs to quit spending billions of dollars financing coups, invading countries and trying to implement world government through brute force.  It is time that the people endorsing this type of insane foreign policy be removed from power and exposed as traitors.  America has enough issues domestically that need to be sorted out, but instead of solving real problems these buffoons are pushing the country towards world war.  A mental institution would be a suitable place for these idiots.

Once restricted merely to conspiracy circles, the term “false flag attack” became part of the popular lexicon during the recent Syrian chemical weapons debacle. Former Representative Ron Paul (R-Tex) referred to allegations that the Syrian government had used sarin gas as a false flag before adding, “The group most likely to benefit from it is al Qaeda.” But even though Muslim revolutionaries were most likely involved in the use of chemical weapons, the source of these heinous attacks can be traced to familiar players.On September 17, Jason Ditz, news editor of the website “Antiwar.com,” wrote, “Israeli ambassador Michael Oren revealed that the Israeli government has privately been seeking change in neighboring Syria for the past two years since the ongoing civil war began.”

Four months earlier, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s right-hand man during his term in the Bush administration, spoke of an earlier chemical attack in Syria.

“This could have been an Israeli false flag operation,” he said. “You’ve got basically a geo-strategically, geo-political — if you will — inept regime in Tel Aviv right now.” Wilkerson is known for calling intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in October 2005 a “hoax.”

In regard to Syria, respected ex-Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) analyst Ray McGovern averred that so-called evidence presented by the Obama administration “would not stand up in a court of law.” According to McGovern, despite Israel’s attempts at perpetual instability in the Middle East, saner heads prevailed via our military’s top brass.

Scott Baker, senior editor of the liberal website “Op-Ed News,” addressed this issue on September 11. “McGovern says the military got to the president, overriding even the objections of the military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff,” wrote Baker on his website.

On September 2, popular news website “The World Tribune” editorialized about the military’s wise request to slow down the path to war in the form of General Martin Dempsey, who showed his reluctance to be a participant in this potential fiasco.

“Dempsey has been unusually blunt in his remarks with both Obama and Vice President Joe Biden,” opined the “Tribune.” “His assessment is that any U.S. war against Assad will involve his foreign allies, and that means Tehran and to a smaller extent, Moscow.”

Already, comparisons between Obama and President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have been made, particularly in terms of lies and exaggerations regarding weapons of mass destruction. For example, Secretary of State John Kerry stated that 1,429 people, including 426 children, died in the August 21 chemical attack just outside Damascus. Yet humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders, which has doctors on the ground in Syria, estimated the total at only 355. Red Cross Operations Director George Kettaneh directly contradicted Obama administration claims that a Syrian man had tested positive for traces of toxic gases in his bloodstream.

Yossef Bodansky, the senior editor for Defense & Foreign Affairs magazine, took it a step further in a September 1 article published on the news agency’s website, entitled “Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?”

As former director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, Bodansky’s sources acknowledged that on August 13, at a Turkish military prison in Antakya, representatives from Qatar, Turkey and the U.S.—including U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford—met with Syrian opposition leaders to unleash a “war changing development.”

Saleh Muslim, overseer of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party, agreed with Bodansky’s assessment, asserting that this secret meeting was “aimed at framing Assad and provoking an international reaction.”

World Isn’t Buying Syria Story

• Doubletalking American leaders have lost all credibility

To provide the most accurate picture possible of what really transpired in Syria, this writer interviewed four experts on alleged chemical weapons use in Syria. The first was Caleb Maupin, a political activist for the International Action Center, which opposes domestic and international injustices.

Maupin began with this definitive statement: “I absolutely believe that the Syrian chemical attacks were a false flag. It wasn’t in Assad’s best interest to take such actions, especially with UN inspector forces staying 10 minutes away. Rebels had already been arrested in Turkey for using sarin gas, plus, in May, UN official Carla Del Ponte verified that rebels used chemical agents.”

With these words, Maupin turned his attention to the rebels. “The so-called Syrian revolution is manufactured,” he said. “The plan Obama instituted is similar to Libya where foreign-based rebel groups were set up to destabilize the region. These rebels have committed horrible atrocities, including beheadings, using underage soldiers and recruiting children from other parts of the Middle East. In addition, the rebels are expelling Christians from Syria and slaughtering Alawite citizens.”

Alawites consist of a minority of Shiite Muslims in Syria. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s family are Alawites.

Maupin continued this line of thought. “Apparently, the motive all along was for the rebels to carry out these attacks. One of their leaders even told the Daily Mail they were going to do it and then blame it on the Assad government.”

In terms of the big picture, Maupin explained: “The U.S. government is arming these rebels to destabilize Syria. Permanent civil war is the game plan, just like in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The goal isn’t stable governments, but chaos.”

Jerry Policoff, a senior editor for the popular news website “Op-Ed News,” voiced similar concerns. “I’m suspicious of the rebels, particularly after hearing all sorts of stories about the Saudis giving them chemicals,” said Policoff. “I think Assad is perfectly capable of gassing his own people, but he’s not that stupid to do it with UN inspection teams only blocks away.”

Chris Reith, a member of the protest group Hands Off Syria, offered a slightly different perspective. “I’m not even certain that the rebels were responsible,” said Reith. “It could have been other terrorists in the area that brought weapons through Turkey. All it takes is a couple grams of sarin to cause major damage.”

Reith cited a report that was published in the September 30 issue of AFP. “Alawite children were kidnapped before the chemical attacks, and then their corpses were used for propaganda,” he said.

When asked who may be responsible, Reith responded: “The CIA is in Syria courting the rebels, and Israeli Mossad involvement is always possible. [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu knows the Golan Heights [a part of southern Syria occupied by Israel] has [natural] resources, and Israel has been trying to push into that area for years. Once they take out Syria and Hezbollah, the next target is Iran.”

As for U.S. leadership, Policoff—a fervent Democrat since the 1960s—argued: “I don’t believe anything Obama or John Kerry say. When the British Parliament denied Prime Minister David Cameron, Obama got cold feet. That was a huge smack down. Then, when he realized Congress wouldn’t approve his plans for attack, Obama really looked like an amateur. On the other hand, Kerry is nothing more than an opportunist. You have to wonder about anyone who’s a member of Skull & Bones.”

Finally, popular independent journalist Zen Gardner, who maintains his own news website, told AFP: “That an inept career chameleon politician like John Kerry was used as a frontman is so apt, it makes one wonder if this whole charade wasn’t set up to fail.”

‘Peace President’ Fomenting War

Conflicting reports are surfacing as to the extent of U.S. involvement in arms shipments to Syrian rebels. Clarissa Ward of CBS News depicts the Free Syrian Army, the rebel group backed by the U.S., as a band of ragtag soldiers barely able to supply bullets for their guns. Others see the situation far differently.

On September 5, reporter Athena Yenko of the International Business Times described 400 tons of weaponry being delivered to Syrian rebels.

Yossef Bodansky of Defense & Foreign Affairs magazine agreed. In a commentary published in August, Bodansky wrote: “Opposition forces received . . . mainly anti-aircraft weaponry from shoulder-fired missiles to ammunition for light guns and machine guns. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. intelligence.”

CNN Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr introduced another element in a September 12 column.

“The weapons are not American-made, but are funded and organized by the CIA,” she wrote. These include anti-tank weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and high-tech communications equipment.

Rounding out the picture, on September 11 Ernesto Londono and Greg Miller of The Washington Post wrote: “The CIA has been delivering weapons to rebels in Syria . . . as had been promised by the Obama administration. The shipments began streaming into the country over the past two weeks, along with separate deliveries by the State Dept. of vehicles and other gear—a flow of material that marks a major escalation of the U.S. role in Syria’s civil war.”

‘Kerry a Liar,’ Says Russia

While Secretary of State John Kerry, President Barack Obama and other White House spokesmen would like the world to believe that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was the criminal party behind the August 21 chemical attack in Syria, a UN fact-finding team led by Swedish scientist Ake Sellstrom refused to cast blame. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon conveyed a similar verdict, saying: “It is for others to decide whether to pursue this matter further to determine responsibility.”

On the other hand, Russian President Vladimir Putin had choice words for America, calling Kerry a “liar” when denying to a congressional committee that al Qaeda was operating in Syria.

The Russians also released a 100-page report in March claiming that a chemical attack outside of Aleppo where 26 residents died had been conducted by U.S. allies, not Assad.

On September 5, Matthew Schofield of the McClatchy News Service reported on these findings: “The statement’s summary said that neither the munitions nor the poison gas in the Khan al Asal attack appeared to fit what is possessed by the Syrian government.”

To date, three chemical attacks have actually occurred in Syria this year: one in Aleppo, the second in Saraqib and a third outside Damascus in Ghouta.

Of course, similar crimes against humanity stretch back a century to the use of mustard gas in WWI, phosphorous grenade bombs in WWII, Agent Orange and napalm during Vietnam, Saddam Hussein’s gassing of Kurds in 1988, plus the release of white phosphorous and depleted uranium by Israeli and U.S. forces against Palestinians and Iraqis in the early-to-mid 2000s.

– See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=13151#sthash.IF941HmA.dpuf