Well, this is a relief.

I was worried that the judge was going to ban me from my daily sessions of masturbating to nude images of Katie Hill, which along with Jen Psaki ASMR, is really the only thing keeping me sane.

RT:

A judge has tossed a lawsuit by former representative Katie Hill, ruling that her nude photos that were leaked to the media amid claims she had affairs with staffers were not revenge porn, but covered by the freedom of speech.

Los Angeles Judge Yolanda Orozco sided with the Daily Mail as she ruled on Wednesday that naked images of Hill taken by her ex-husband Kenny Heslep and leaked to the paper “were a matter of public issue or public interest,” since they were indicative of Hill’s “character and qualifications for her position.”

BASED Latina natural conservative ftw.

Orozco noted that the photos in question showed Hill with a campaign aide, with whom she reportedly had an affair at the time, as well as appearing “to show [her] using a then-illegal drug and displaying a tattoo that was controversial because it resembled a white supremacy symbol.”

The judge rejected the argument by Hill’s attorney that the paper could have just limited its scoop to describing the images without publishing them, calling such reasoning “unpersuasive.”

“The fact that information to be gleaned from an image may be disseminated in an alternative manner does not equate to a finding that the image itself is not a matter of public concern,” Orozco said.

The story made headlines in October 2019, and ultimately resulted in Hill’s resignation despite the outpouring of support she received from her own party and the mainstream media that rallied to her defense. Facing accusations that she had multiple affairs on the job, including with her legislative director, Hill admitted to a relationship with one female campaign staffer, but rejected any other allegations of inappropriate behavior. She vowed to take the British tabloid, which exclusively published the images, including the one showing her smoking a bong naked and spotting what appeared to be a swastika tattoo, to court, arguing she was a victim of “revenge porn.”

It’s not a Swastika (and it’s concerning that RT thinks it is, actually) – it’s an Iron Cross.

But I’m pretty sure it is a Nazi symbol.

Maybe RT was confused, thinking that the Swastika that was featured inside the Iron Cross military award during the Nazi era was visible in the tattoo.

But it isn’t.

But I don’t know what that could be other than a Nazi-related symbol.

I don’t think if she was a fan of the Kingdom of Prussia, she would get a tattoo of a symbol that is now so strongly associated with Nazism.

What a weird story this was.

It was also interesting, because it proved that feminism trumps association with Nazism. You know, we do wonder about these things – about the order of the various grievance groups, and who trumps who.

For example:

• We know that Moslems are above white homosexuals because Antifa has attacked white homosexuals for having a gay pride parade through a Moslem neighborhood
• We know that blacks are above Latinos because of the prosecution of George Zimmermann for defending himself from Tray-Tray Martin
• We know that feminism CAN in certain cases trump both Jewishness (most of metoo) and blackness (Bill Cosby) – however, this one is less clear, because blacks have gotten away with “sexual harassment” much easier than whites would in various situations
• We know that anti-Russian sentiment trumps Nazi sympathies, as in both the Ukraine and the Baltics, neo-Nazi groups have been endorsed by the West and NATO because they were anti-Russian; in Estonia, World War II parades that celebrate Nazism (and attack Russia) have been praised by the media
• We know that transsexual men are way above white women, as evidenced by everything, and probably, a white male transsexual is above any race of woman
• We know anti-Semitism trumps blackness, as evidenced by attacks on Louis Farrakhan, Kanye West, Nick Cannon, et al.
• We know that supposed historical oppression of India (colonialism) trumps global warming, as the Paris Climate Accords show and as Greta Thunberg herself has stated (that used to be true of China as well, but it isn’t anymore)
• We know that Asians are virtually exempt from any form of grievance politics, as evidenced by attacks on Chinese racism, use of affirmative action against Asians, and others (nonetheless, the new “anti-Asian hate bias” campaign the media has launched is trying to use black attacks on Asians to attack whites)
• We know that vaccines trump blackness, as evidenced by concerted campaigns against black anti-vaccine efforts claiming that the vaccination agenda is representative of white oppression of blacks

The fact that the media sided with Katie Hill after the printing of the nude photos proved that being a AWFL trumps associations with Nazism.

However, at the same time, AWFLs have been labeled “Karens” and attacked as anti-black racists for being afraid blacks were going to attack them, or being upset that blacks were committing various crimes.

Most infamously, a woman alone in Central Park with her dog thought a black man – who claimed to be a bird watcher – was going to rape her and called the police. (There is a Wikipedia page about this incident.)

She was disgraced as a white racist hater, despite the fact that I’m very certain she had BLM stuff all over her social media.

She really got wrecked – she was fired, and this is going to be a stain attached to her for the rest of her life (or as long as this current system lasts).

So according to current logic, if we take the Katie Hill nudes and the Central Park Karen incident alongside each other, thinking a black man is going to rape you is worse than being a Nazi.

But let’s take a step back here: just even wanting to classify this logically is probably the wrong approach. It is right-wing, white male thinking to say “give me an ordered list of who is the most and least oppressed, and whose grievances trump whose grievances.”

I don’t think any of the bulletpoints I outlined above actually represent any definitive policy or ideological belief, I think they just signal pragmatism: everything is always against heterosexual white men, but when the grievance interests collide, the rulers just choose whatever is more beneficial to the bigger agenda.

I think this is the biggest problem that right-wing people have with the left: there is no internal logic or consistency to any of it. It is all based in feminine drives and Jewishness (which is itself a feminine drive), and feminine drives are entirely based on emotionalism. There is no consistency in emotionalism, as it is entirely based on an arbitrary feelings-response to any stimuli.

The media is capable of manipulating emotional responses, completely. That is how they’ve used the empowerment of women, and the de-masculinization of men to create a system where nothing that happens has a requirement to make any sense. As long as women, and other emotional people, can be swayed by a media presentation, the presentation works.

Consensus on Irrational Nonsense

Along with making decisions based on emotions, women are obsessed with consensus. Therefore, the media is very capable of forming consensus around things that make no sense.

Anyone could have seen that the lockdowns would be much more damaging to society than the virus, based on all of the official data presented by the establishment. That was clear as soon as the hospitals were empty during the initial two week “flatten the curve” event. But the consensus formed was that it didn’t matter how many people suffered or died as a result of the lockdown, because the only thing that mattered was lives lost from the virus.

Glenn Greenwald – who is a homosexual, and thus totally paranoid about germs – was on Tucker Carlson the other day to talk about having been robbed at gunpoint at his weekend home in Brazil.

(Here is the article Glenn wrote on the topic, though I haven’t read it because save for a few special occasions, I don’t read any contemporary internet nonfiction prose as a rule, because I don’t want it to influence my own writing.)

He said that as a journalist, he didn’t like writing about himself, but decided to write about the robbery because he’d seen the video of the little Vietnamese girl talking about how her family was robbed and how she can’t sleep because she thinks the robbers are coming back.

During that robbery event, the mother of the family says that one of the black robbers whispered in her ear something to the effect of: “we’re not going to kill you or rape you, we just don’t have any money because of the virus.” That didn’t mean much, because one of the other blacks was pointing the gun at the little girl and saying he would kill her. But I guess it did mean something, because no one was killed or raped.

The video of the girl is really moving, actually.

(There is actually probably some commentary on race that could be said here, given that a white girl presumably would not be able to compose herself and speak on the event in such a straightforward way.)

If the media wanted to, this video of the Vietnamese could be used to create an emotional consensus that:

• The lockdown is a crime against humanity
• Black people are violent animals

It is all completely arbitrary.

If I had control of the media for one day, I could form an emotional consensus belief about all of my personal issues within a couple of hours. Then, when the media was turned back over to the Jews the next day, they could reestablish their own positions in the same timeframe.

It is all totally arbitrary.

Greenwald notes that much of the crime that is happening is a result of the lockdown, and that the consensus put a taboo on talking about the effects of a lockdown in contrast to the supposed effects of the supposed virus.

The lockdown is a part of the rising crime phenomenon, and the lockdown is doing other horrible things. But the main driver is the BLM movement. That is another emotional consensus that makes no sense at all.

Look at this:

Those murders are virtually 100% black-on-black, and they rose at such a rate because of the BLM movement.

If you were a racist, and you wanted to kill as many black people as possible, you would create the BLM movement to defund the police.

But the media has created the emotionally-driven consensus that anyone who believes the police should exist at all is an anti-black racist. Despite the fact that it is simply an objective reality that defunding the police (as well as removing cash bail and “prison reform”) has led to mass black deaths.

This brings us back to the bottom line: there is no logic in this system. You can’t unravel the logic of it, because there isn’t any logic in it. What that means in practical terms is that there is literally no purpose in attempting to push back against this system using logic. Not anymore. There was a purpose to that in 2015, because the information was not widely available, and in some cases, the arguments weren’t available at all. That changed with /pol/ and (not to toot my own horn) the Daily Stormer (which is mostly ripped off of /pol/) turning these arguments and facts into repeatable sound bites.

At this point, everyone who is capable of being swayed by logical arguments already has been. The only thing left to do now is to figure out some way to build a counter-consensus. The MAGA movement, including QAnon and others, are ripe for that, but they are flailing around, swallowing up disinformation.

Remember Katie Hill?

I’m sure you could never forget this photo:

By the way – trigger warning on that.

I tell you guys not to masturbate and here I am getting you all worked up with that sweet piece of 30-year-old ass.

Don’t ever let a misogynist kike tell you that older women are not superior to younger women. Misogynist kikes and misogynist kike shills are just angry that they have to date teenage girls, because a ripened beauty like Katie Hill won’t give them the time of day because they’re manlet incels.

Katie got famous a while back when she was having some sort of bisexual threesome relationship with an aide, which was considered unethical because the aide was a subordinate (must have been “third-degree rape”).

She was forced to resign from Congress (which in my opinion was the real third-degree rape). Then she came back on TV and was saying she did nothing wrong.

Anyway, this sweet piece of fine ripe ass is saying she’s got third-degree raped Coronavirus.

New York Post:

Former “throuple” Rep. Katie Hill says she has been “exposed” to the coronavirus — and is showing all the symptoms of being sick from the potentially deadly disease.

“I was exposed to COVID-19. Here’s what happened,” wrote the former California congresswoman, who resigned in October under the intense spotlight on her three-way relationship with her husband and a female staffer.

“My dad found out Saturday afternoon that he’d spent a lot of time with a person who tested positive for COVID-19,” she wrote in a three-tweet thread online.

“I was exposed to my dad, but I could have been way before that too… we will never know,” she wrote.

The former pol insisted that she is showing all the classic signs of having the disease.

“I have had a dry cough, shortness of breath, & a fever since Saturday,” she wrote.

Hill did not say whether she has been tested — but spent most of her tweets attacking the government response, suggesting the pandemic is more widespread in the US than currently known.

“Despite what the administration is saying, tests are still in such short supply that public health departments are directing doctors to only test in very specific incidences,” she wrote.

She gave a three-point summary to her messages, saying, “1) we’re not testing enough ppl to know how big this thing is; 2) if you think you’re in the clear, you’re not; 3) our healthcare system is about to be dangerously overloaded & only we can save it so #StayTheF–kHome.”

WAIT WAIT WAIT.

Stay the “f” home?

Is she a Russian agent?

Because this is exactly what the Russian hackers have been saying.

Okay, So All of These Famous People are Getting This, Allegedly…

Also, a Game of Thrones actor, Kristofer Hivju, was just announced to be positive.

Tormund actor Kristofer Hivju tested positive for coronavirus — and 'Game of Thrones' fans are telling him to drink giant's milk https://t.co/5ObNRjvQ3l

— Entertainment Insider (@EntInsider) March 17, 2020

And James Bond.

Idris Elba announced Monday he had tested positive for coronavirus. The actor said he doesn't have any symptoms but stressed the importance of taking precautions, such as social distancing and hand-washing. pic.twitter.com/bEKHYEOhBw

— CBS News (@CBSNews) March 17, 2020

But do you know anyone who has it?

It’s kinda weird, no? That so many famous people have it but no one else seems to have it?

What is going on with that?

Katie Hill’s brother just died last month, apparently of a drug overdose. But they said “we don’t rule out foul play.”

Yesterday my brother Danny – a young man who overcame so much in his short life with so much promise ahead – passed away. My heart is breaking & I’ll miss him forever. Prayers for our family in this impossibly difficult time would be appreciated. 💔(photo at boot camp graduation) pic.twitter.com/NOCGAVz6C2

— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) January 19, 2020

Weird coincidence, that this bitch is constantly in the news and now she’s up there with this virus?

A running conspiracy theory all over the internet is that Coronavirus is a hoax.

We also have people spamming a conspiracy theory that is obviously retarded about how Harvey Weinstein made a deal to get only 23 years in prison instead of 55 in exchange for giving up the names of pedophiles, and that Tom Hanks is a pedophile and is now in custody of the Australian authorities and they are making him fake like he has Coronavirus.

Anyway, whatever – this is just some kind of loony schizoid gibberish.

That said: why is this schizoid gibberish being spammed everywhere? Usually, when you see a dumb conspiracy being heavily promoted, it is actually covering up a better conspiracy that might be closer to the truth.

Have you seen that Sheriff Clarke is out there saying that the virus is a hoax? Like that it doesn’t even real?

He’s even blaming “Soros,” which is a boomer codeword for “the Jews.”

So, how does the sweet piece of ripe ass Katie Hill, her dead brother, the fact that only famous people get this disease, a dumb conspiracy theory about the deep state moving to quash elite pedophile rings, and Sheriff Clarke saying this is a Jew hoax all fit together?

No idea.

Pretty much, I just want to put this all out there and let you know that it’s quite possible something weird could be going on with all of this business.

Don’t rush into some dumb schizo theory. Definitely don’t do that. But examine information critically.

I told you all they would make this bitch into a hero, after she had a lesbian affair with her staff member and then got doxed by her husband for smoking bongs naked with her Nazi tattoo showing.

They’re doing that.

Business Insider:

Former Rep. Katie Hill wrote in a New York Times op-ed that she struggled with suicidal ideation in the aftermath of an alleged “revenge porn” incident.

Hill was elected in November 2018 to serve as the US representative for California’s 25th Congressional district. She announced her intent to resign from Congress roughly one year later, after news broke that she had been in a relationship with a campaign aide.

Nude photos of Hill were also published by two media outlets without her consent. Hill said she believes her estranged husband Kenny Heslep was behind the leak, although she notes that he has said he was hacked. Hill and Heslep are divorcing.

“Many people have nightmares in which they’re naked in public, trapped and trying to escape,” Hill wrote. “In the days leading up to my resignation, my life was just like everyone’s worst nightmare.”

Bitch, you’re right.

This picture of a naked 30-year-old woman is literally my worst nightmare.

It’s been in my nightmares since I first set eyes upon it.

Hill said the stress of the situation left her “shaking, crying, throwing up” in the days after the photos were published.

She also said she and her family were also plagued by harassment. Crank callers phoned her, people stalked her relatives, her staffers received “lewd” threats, and someone even sent a letter containing mysterious powder to her office, Hill wrote.

She added that at a certain point she began experiencing suicidal ideation while hiding away in her apartment.

“Suddenly and with total clarity, I just wanted it all to be over,” she said.

Hill said the suicidal thoughts only stopped when she imagined how her family and friends would react to her death.

Here’s the NYT piece, if anyone cares.

It’s just exactly what you would think it was, what is described above: this horrible bitch playing the victim, saying everyone is against her, saying she did nothing wrong, her evil husband leaked the nudes, she felt so vulnerable and afraid, she thought of suicide.

Think of how much better the world would be if this bitch offed herself.

But of course, she wasn’t ever thinking about that. Women virtually never kill themselves, it’s a statistical fact.

We’ve got a big gender gap there.

I’d like to close that gap. But we won’t ever do it. Women are far too egotistical to kill themselves.

Yet they talk about it constantly.

Because everything about a woman is about using her supposed powerlessness as a means to acquire more power.

What she was thinking about when she says she was thinking about suicide was how to claim she was thinking about suicide in order to garner public sympathy.

The best part is, Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks is running for her seat since she resigned, and he’s running on a campaign promise to legalize sex with animals.

I told you this bitch would make herself a victim.

Although it isn’t as though that was a difficult prediction to make.

Her weird sex scandal could end up being a boon to her career in the long term. Probably will be.

The Guardian:

The former California congresswoman Katie Hill, who resigned in October after the publication of nude photographs and allegations of an affair with a member of her congressional staff, said on Sunday rightwing media outlets attacked women because “they’re easier targets” for bullying.

In an interview on CNN’s Reliable Sources, the Democrat said bullying affects women across the US, whether they are teen girls or power-players such as the former Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch and ex-national security council official Fiona Hill.

Yovanovitch and Hill, both naturalized US citizens, testified in the congressional impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump. As with other witnesses, Trump supporters in the media questioned their loyalty to the US.

“As a public figure,” Hill said, “you’re used to attacks, right? But when it gets to the level of these threats and feeling like you’re not seen as a person anymore … the dehumanization is something that I think people can’t really understand unless you have been there.

“And that’s exactly what the rightwing media does and that they’re doing to these witnesses. And look what they’re doing to Fiona Hill and what they did to Ambassador Yovanovitch.

“And I think that you see it in particular with women, because … that is what the right likes to do, right? They’re easier targets. And there are true threats to safety.”

Hill has accused her ex-husband of leaking the photographs which contributed to her downfall, in what some have described as a “revenge porn” scandal.

Conservative media outlets released the images and a House ethics committee investigation was launched. Hill admitted an affair with a campaign worker, but denied claims of an intimate relationship with a member of her congressional staff.

Hill told CNN she wanted to remain in the public sphere, saying: “I think what the rightwing media and those who attacked me wanted was for me to be silenced.

“And I think something that we see on attacks against women, not just high-profile women but women across the board, is that these kinds of attacks are meant to silence you, demean you and show that you do not have power.

If the lack of shame shocks you, you are a sweet summer child.

I have said before that keeping a blackmail file on your wife might be a good strategy for defending against a divorce rape situation (of course you should check your local laws and make sure you’re not doing anything illegal).

But it seems that this simply will not work any more than a pre-nup will work.

Katie Hill’s husband literally kept a blackmail file on her and dox dumped when she went for the divorce rape, and now she’s the victim. She’s suffered a minor setback, but she will come back stronger than ever, it appears.

Basically, if you enter into a marriage as a man, you are entering into the worst conceivable form of slavery. Because even during chattel slavery, there were certain duties that the slave-owner had to his slaves. And of course, the slave-owners were much more likely to be kind and understanding towards their slaves, because they were men.

A woman is a vicious, hateful, soulless creature intent on causing pain and destruction in order to please her ego. There is no being on earth more cruel than a human female.

A couple of weeks ago, Katie Hill was unfairly run out of Congress for having a Nazi tattoo, smoking bongs, having threesomes and orgies, having a pet goat and – above all else – being a gamer.

Also a lot of people were jealous that she stayed in such good shape, being 32 years old.

The good news is: she’s already staging a comeback.

Which reminds me of a certain little song from a certain little band that I like to call “AC/DC.”

Please listen to that song while you listen to her video announcing her return.

The fight continues — if you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention. (shout out to my friend @AyannaPressley for the shirt and the reminder 😉) pic.twitter.com/jUpBOcYIy4

— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) November 12, 2019

I’d also like to congratulate Twitter for not banning her for being a gamer caught in a scandal.

This is definitely the first time that ever happened. Let me tell you that.

Our girl in Congress has gone down burning.

Hopefully this just means she’s planning to regroup and run for governor.

CNN:

Democratic Rep. Katie Hill of California on Sunday announced her resignation from Congress days after she admitted to having an inappropriate relationship with a campaign staffer before coming into office.

“It is with a broken heart that today I announce my resignation from Congress,” Hill said in a statement Sunday. “This is the hardest thing I have ever had to do, but I believe it is the best thing for my constituents, my community, and our country.”

News of Hill’s resignation comes after the House Committee on Ethics announced Wednesday it was opening an investigation into allegations Hill engaged in an improper relationship with a congressional staffer in possible violation of House rules which were changed last year to ban relationships between members and their staff.

In a statement last week, Hill denied that the relationship — allegedly involving Graham Kelly, who currently works as her legislative director — took place. CNN has reached out to Kelly for comment, but has not heard back.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement Sunday night that Hill “has acknowledged errors in judgment that made her continued service as a Member untenable.”

While Pelosi praised Hill for making “a great contribution as a leader of the Freshman Class” of House Democrats, she added that “we must ensure a climate of integrity and dignity in the Congress, and in all workplaces.”

Hill was elected to Congress in the 2018 midterm elections, defeating a Republican incumbent to represent a swing district. The vice chairwoman of the powerful House Oversight committee, Hill was viewed as a rising star in the party. She played a key role in the Democratic Caucus, representing and advocating for House Democratic freshmen’s interests to Democratic leadership.

Last weekend, a conservative blog released intimate photos of Hill, alleging she and her husband had a separate relationship with an unnamed female campaign staffer. That report included three photos of the congresswoman, including an explicit photo. Hill has said that Kenny Heslep, her husband of nine years, with whom she is currently in divorce proceedings, is trying to humiliate her by sharing the photographs. CNN has reached out to Hill’s husband for comment but has not heard back. Hill offered no evidence linking her husband to the distribution of the photos.

Hill also reiterated on Sunday that she will pursue legal action regarding the publication of the photographs, saying she has contacted US Capitol Police about the matter.

Last Thursday, a British tabloid published additional intimate photographs of Hill.

lol @ CNN calling the Daily Mail “a British tabloid.”

People know what the Daily Mail is, CNN.

(Referring to Red State as merely a “conservative blog” is kinda funny though.)

Here are those photos.

Not only does Hill have a sweet Nazi tattoo, she’s also got an ultra-hot body – especially for a 30-year-old woman!

She is the last gamer in Congress as well – and this is believed to be the reason why she was persecuted for her Nazi beliefs, orgies and bong rips.

This is exactly why it is time for a civil war, wherein the Republic of Gamers finally declares independence from the US federal “nigger” government.

We won’t forget your sacrifice, Katie.

The black flag of ROG will soon fly over sovereign gamer territory.

So whoever leaked that story to Red State, regarding California Congresswoman Katie Hill’s weird lesbian affair with her staffer, got mad that the whole thing wasn’t printed so they sent it to Daily Mail who was like “SHIP IT NOW.”

So we get to see the other bitch’s face. And the sweet Nazi tattoo. Not to mention Katie Hill’s awesome body. Who says a woman can’t be in shape at 30 (seriously, she was only thirty when these pictures were taken, maybe younger – she’s 32 now).

So yeah, I mean.

That’s the government for you. And women. And… America.

So, Katie Hill, a freshman California Democrat Congresswoman – or shall we say, Congressperson – was called out for having a sexual relationship with a female staffer, which her husband was involved in. Basically, an unsanctioned polygamy relationship – although apparently with a lesbian element between the two women (which I’m pretty sure is HARAM in Islam and definitely not allowed in Mormonism – but it may in fact go on in these other modern polygamy situations, I don’t know).

Red State broke the story (never thought I’d write that sentence) a few days ago.

Apparently, the staffer/second wife figure – and the husband, maybe – went to them, because texts were printed between Hill and the unnamed staffer. This is Hill telling the staffer that she doesn’t want to see her again, after she allegedly broke off the entire threesome, dumping both her husband and the staffer:

They censored the leaked images (and didn’t even publish most of the nudes!).

I didn’t want to see this bitch’s titties, but would have liked to know what the staffer looks like.

Anyway, this is all whatever – who gives a shit about these freaks?

But my thing here is: I’m not exactly sure why this would be considered inappropriate.

I mean, we’re shooting little boys with puberty-blocker hormones to chemically sterilize them in advance of cutting their dicks off. The state is literally mandating it. A little threesome action is the virtual ideal of sexual innocence in this modern culture.

Fox News:

Rep. Katie Hill, D-Calif., admitted Wednesday she had an “inappropriate” relationship with a campaign staffer, but denied a report of an affair with her legislative director, all while vowing to cooperate with the House Ethics Committee in its newly launched investigation.

In a letter to constituents obtained by Fox News, Hill acknowledged that in the final years of what she called an “abusive marriage,” she began a relationship with the unnamed campaign staffer.

“I know that even a consensual relationship with a subordinate is inappropriate, but I still allowed it to happen despite my better judgment,” Hill wrote. “For that I apologize. I wish nothing but the best for her and hope everyone respects her privacy in this difficult time.”

She continued, “I am going through a divorce from an abusive husband who seems determined to try to humiliate me. I am disgusted that my opponents would seek to exploit such a private matter for political gain. This coordinated effort to try to destroy me and the people close to me is despicable and will not succeed. I, like many women who have faced attacks like this before, am stronger than those who want me to be afraid.”

Hill repeated her denial that she had an affair with a congressional staffer but stated that she was “fully and proactively cooperating with the Ethics Committee.”

The committee confirmed earlier Wednesday it was launching an inquiry into Hill in response to the RedState report. That same report also described her relationship with the campaign staffer as a “throuple” with Hill’s estranged husband.

“The committee is aware of public allegations that Representative Katie Hill may have engaged in a sexual relationship with an individual on her congressional staff, in violation of House Rule XXIII, Clause 18(a),” Committee Chairman Ted Deutch, D-Fla., and Ranking Member Kenny Marchant, R-Texas, wrote. They added that the panel had launched “an investigation and will gather additional information regarding the allegations.”

The statement did not indicate the committee had empaneled an “investigative subcommittee,” the equivalent of a congressional indictment.

Last week, RedState reported that Hill, who is openly bisexual, had developed a “long-term sexual relationship” with the unnamed staffer from her congressional campaign, who ultimately entered into the “throuple” with Hill’s husband, Kenny Heslep — who later filed for divorce. The three of them, according to RedState’s confidential sources, had taken multiple vacations together.

Okay, okay.

I get the “power dynamics” thing, and that there is a law against sex with staffers because of this whole Marxist interpretation of power dynamics.

However, I think we all understand that this is about older men ostensibly “exploiting” younger women.

(In actual fact, these laws are set up to ALLOW women to exploit their bosses sexually, because only the boss gets punished.)

Surely, a lesbian relationship is outside of the bounds of these established rules, is it not?

That’s certainly the argument I’d be making if I was her. I’d be crying homophobia.

Because according to the internal logic of this Marxist doctrine, both of them would have been oppressed by power dynamics both for being women and for being lesbians. Yes, Hill would have had more power than the staffer, but Hill would have been forced to date the staffer because of power dynamic oppression keeping her from seeking a lesbian relationship outside of her immediate circle. She was oppressed into having a secret lesbian relationship, so she had to do it with the staffer.

Right?