The British tabloid media is going nuts over the fact that Prince William’s wife, Kate Middleton, was photographed for the first time since she’s been a princess in shorts.

And yes, the 37-year-old mother of three does have great legs, despite her very masculine face.

We can only imagine that she has a fantastic ass as well.

It is totally possible for women to stay in shape into their thirties and even their forties. The only thing that necessarily goes to hell is the breasts, but you’re only going to see them when she’s naked anyway, because of bra technologies.

Presently, there are few women in their early twenties that have legs anywhere near as nice as nearly 40-year-old Kate, and that should be a real wake-up call to these filthy fat whores.

The term “fat whore” is not even a complete term for the modern woman. Because they are also often drunks, drug users and binge-watchers of Netflix.

The complete term for this is “glutton.”

This is one of the 7 deadly sins.

All of the problems in our society go back to these 7 sins, and the fact that we’ve embraced them.

1. Lust
2. Gluttony
3. Greed
4. Sloth
5. Wrath
6. Envy
7. Pride

Until we address this and return to the design of God, we are going to be dealing with nothing but a bunch of irate fat whores.

I should do a series on how the 7 deadly sins are manifesting in our society.

Yesterday it was announced that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been blessed with their first child.  While this was the cause of nearly universal celebration, there was some disappointment that the Duchess had given birth to a boy, and not a girl.  Writing in the Daily Mail, Robert Hardman explains:

How the times have changed. When Prince Charles was born 65 years ago, there was national rejoicing that Princess Elizabeth’s first-born was a boy.

Indeed, when Prince William was born 34 years later, it was still the  prevailing view that a male heir to the heir to the throne was preferable for the monarchy and the nation.

But now? There is, of course, universal delight that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are the proud parents of a healthy baby.

But there will still have been mild disappointment in certain quarters that he has not turned out to be a she.

For it was the prospect of this baby’s birth — and the possibility that it would be a girl — that led to laws dating back to 1351 being overturned to ensure that a royal girl is no longer legally inferior to a boy.

Had the little boy been a girl, she would have been the first in royal  history born to be Queen. A royal daughter would have cheered the modernisers. Now, for the next three reigns at least, Britain will be singing God Save The King

Cultural Marxists talk endlessly about fairness and promoting blindness to gender, race, etc., but their true intention is to invert the natural system of values.  They do not want men and women to be seen as equal, they want women to be seen as superior in every way.  Traditional society gave women their own unique sphere in which they were expected to excel men, but in the modern world men, especially white, Christian men, are to be treated as inferior in every area of life.

But despite the unfortunate gender of the child, Mr. Hardman assures us that the constitutional amendments were not in vain:

It will be many years before any of this makes any difference to the new royal baby.

Even so, in later life he will be able to reflect that his impending birth changed the constitutional rules and struck a  modest blow for equal rights.

The irony of bringing equal rights to an institution as inherently inegalitarian as the monarchy seems to have escaped Mr. Hardman .  But who knows, maybe the modernisers will yet have reason to rejoice, if it turns out that the newborn child, although physically male, grows up to identify as female.  What a devastating blow to the forces of evil that would be.