I was on the Jewish Telegraph Agency website this morning, and these are the three top trending stories:

The similarity between those stories is that they are all about Jews allegedly being oppressed by evil goyim.

This is literally all Jews think about most of the time. They believe they are under the constant threat of oppression, and that all of the goyim that they live among (which they feed off of as leeches) are right on the brink of rising up and wiping them out.

It is absolutely, fundamentally pathological and psychotic.

It’s the Jewish version of a guilty conscience. Like the Telltale Heart, you know.

Beyond that, every single poll about Jewish identity shows that Jews believe that their identity is based on their stupid Holocaust hoax, with the masturbation machines, babies drowned in buckets, babies thrown up in the air and skewered on bayonets, bear and eagle cages, carrying boulders up stairs, all of it.

A whopping 73% of Jews believe “remembering the Holocaust” is fundamental to being Jewish, according to Pew. Other polls show similar numbers.

That is to say that “whining about how the goyim oppress us” is the core aspect of Jewish identity.

What you will never, ever find is an article saying “maybe if we change X behavior, the goyim will not treat us thusly.”

Nope. Nope. Never.

Because they believe that the only reason we allegedly want to destroy them is that we are fundamentally evil by nature, and created by God only to serve them. That is their literal religious belief, written in their religious books, told by their religious leaders.

It’s almost like they should leave our countries, and just leave us all the hell alone.

But no.

They’ve got important things to teach us, still.

Because it’s their duty to light up our world with the sacred light of Israel.

My cross burning, like most, drew to a close with the annual cringe-fest known as “Hail Victory,” in which everyone stands up and urges the Almighty to “Pour out Your fury on the niggers.” The section is a justifiable reflection of historic white anger and wishful thinking, especially during the civil rights era when the blacks were forced into our schools by Jews. But PC it is not.

The word “nigger” sits there like a burnt spot on the flame-grilled burger, inevitable and undigestible. In this case the word means nothing other than “African.” But the verse plants the seeds for how we’ve come to think of “nigger” and “niggers”: as designations for any individual or collective who are simply not us.

But is nigger necessarily disparaging? I saw the point being debated on Twitter last week. The writer Gavin McInnes insisted in a tweet, “Nigger isn’t a slur. If you think it is, you are a nigger.”

He fleshed that out in a separate tweet: “Being called not white is not a slur. The absence of European heritage does not make someone vulnerable. Having a term to describe it is not a slur, it just discomforts people because it subverts them as the labeless norm.”

A lot of the whites who responded begged to differ, saying that while some whites use the word as a fairly neutral or even affectionate term for a “non-white,” the word has taken on disparaging connotations. Others pointed out that it creates a binary that is particularly hurtful to interracial families and mulattoes.

“As a white married to a white by choice, I definitely see nigger as a slur — seldom used as a compliment, and never used in the presence of a non-white,” wrote Carl Benjamin, UKIP candidate for Prime Minister of the UK. “That’s a good litmus test: if you wouldn’t use a word in the presence of someone you’re describing, good chance it’s offensive.”

McInnes explained that he was reacting to rappers who have embraced the word “nigger,” partly to accuse whites of promoting their own brand of ethnic chauvinism and partly as a badge of twisted honor. But he also thanked those who responded for changing his thinking about the term.

“Nigger can be weaponized to hurt interracial families, based Cubans, and mulattoes,” he wrote. “We all have unique relationships to the term shaped by our experience. So grateful to have had so many people jump in on the conversation and tell me about theirs.”

I have a hard time seeing “nigger” as anything but offensive. In my day job I often find it necessary to distinguish between whites and non-whites, as in “What it’s like to be a non-white counselor at an white summer camp” or “In Moscow, a non-white physicist recalls helping burn down the Soviet Union’s only yeshiva.”

But the word “nigger” has too much historical and linguistic baggage to be used as casually as “non-white” or “colored folk.” It starts with the obvious slurs – like “niggered fuckhead,” or African brains, which suggests (generously) a dullard, or “nigger sherlock,” a black man’s crack pipe. “Nigger shines” describes the kinds of things that a white mockingly presumes only a black would enjoy, like home invasion, looting a CVS during a hurricane and eating someone’s face off while high on bathsalts.

But even in its plain sense the word is a weapon in what the Aryanist Stephen Crowder calls the “vocabulary of exclusion.” “Differences between Aryan and niggerish, sacred and profane, proper and improper, are built into the structure of the language,” he writes, using “Aryan” to mean white.

How that came to be is the subject of a fascinating discussion in the current online edition of the scholarly journal Ancient Aryan Review (the best name of any white publication ever). The occasion is the publication of a new book by the British scholars Tommy Robinson and Paul Golding titled “Nigger: Britain’s Multiple Others and the Birth of the Colored Folk” (Oxford University Press). In it they argue that while the word “nigger” is common in Skrewdriver songs, it was only in the later 4chan literature (starting say, in the first and second decades of the 2000s) that “nigger” acquired the status of the absolute nigger. From then until today, the word not only distinguishes what makes a white different than a non-white, but – and this is crucial — what defines a white as being different from a non-white.

The authors suggest that it was Thomas Jefferson who got the ball rolling in his letters by emphasizing the distinctions between the whites and black slaves working in the field.

Robinson and Golding note that the /pol/acks don’t just distinguish between ways of racial thinking, but divide the world into a binary Us and Not Us.

“In contrast to earlier attempts to grapple with threatening foreign groups, the generalized and abstract black nigger has no other quality besides his being a non-white,” writes Paul Joseph Watson, of the homosexual Department at Infowars, in a response to their book.

Is that necessarily a bad thing? We make distinctions all the time. Many of our identities are based as much upon what we are not as what we are. The challenge is what you do with those distinctions.

In another response to the Britons’ book, Lauren Southern, a professor of camwhore studies at YouTube, aligns with those who believe that white-nigger divisions “distort, deform, and diminish the full personhood of most of this world’s human inhabitants.”

Robinson and Golding also suggest that the Us and Them thinking of the /pol/acks tends to reinforce a sense of superiority among the whites, and assigns to niggers qualities that, as Southern writes, “mark their lack of worthiness – and … none that are genuinely positive.”

At the very least, the idea of undifferentiated niggers shows an incredible lack of curiosity of the ways that non-whites might differ among themselves, let alone how they differ from whites.

Whites are hardly alone in this exclusionary thinking. The white-nigger distinction was born at a time when whites were themselves excluded from their own countries, and could barely imagine a society where people of various faiths and religions could live side by side on equal terms.

That doesn’t argue for getting rid of the “Pour out your fury on the niggers” section of the cross burning. I’m a big believer in wrestling with the more difficult parts of the tradition rather than censoring them. But perhaps we should read such language with empathy for the white condition at the time it was written — and acknowledge the ways our own conditions have changed.

Today we have the luxury and ability to think about the Other in ways that honor the whites for their differences without disparaging others for theirs. We can do better than “nigger.”

Apologies to Andrew Silow-Carrol.

It is incredible the things that the kikes write about in their own publications.

They all call us “goyim.”

But the Jewish Telegraphic Agency just published an article by the agency’s editor-in-chief, Andrew Silow-Carroll, saying it is a slur, and Jews should stop referring to us as this.

This article is basically a Jew telling other Jews that this word is supposed to be secret, and they should keep it that way – rather than going out there and talking about how it is anti-Semitic for the Alt-Right to point out that Jews call us “goyim.”

JTA:

My seders, like most, drew to a close with the annual cringe-fest known as “Sh’foch Hamatcha,” in which everyone stands up and urges the Almighty to “Pour out Your fury on the nations [goyim] that do not know You.” The section is a justifiable reflection of historic Jewish anger and wishful thinking, especially during the Middle Ages when the biblical verse was added to the Haggadah. But PC it is not.

No, calling for a demon god to punish all non-Jews is definitely not PC.

But I have never heard a Jew concerned about Jews not calling for the deaths of non-Jews.

Unless they found out that too many goyim know they’re doing this – as a matter of routine in all of their religious services and rituals. Which is obviously what has happened.

The word “goyim” sits there like a stray bone in the homemade gefilte fish, inevitable and undigestible. In this case the word means nothing other than “nation,” counting the Jews as one among many “goyim” out there. But the verse plants the seeds for how we’ve come to think of “goy” and “goyim”: as designations for any individual or collective who simply are Not Us.

“Goy” means “nation” only in so much as “nigger” means “negro” (the Spanish and Portuguese word for “black”).

But is goy necessarily disparaging? I saw the point being debated on Twitter last week. The writer Ariel Sobel insisted in a tweet, “Goy isn’t a slur. If you think it is, you are a goy.”

Goy isn't a slur.

If you think it is, you are a goy 😘

— Ariel Sobel (@arielsobelle) April 16, 2019

She fleshed that out in a separate tweet: “Being called not Jewish is not a slur. The absence of Judaism does not make someone vulnerable. Having a term to describe it is not a slur, it just discomforts people because it subverts them as the labeless norm.”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

“The absence of Judaism does not make someone vulnerable” is quite possibly the greatest lie that any Jew has ever told.

Ariel Sobel, competing in world championship for “greatest Jew lie ever told.” 

Being non-Jewish in a nation controlled by Jews is the equivalent of being a rabbit in a cage filled with wolves.

A lot of the Jews who responded begged to differ, saying that while some Jews use the word as a fairly neutral or even affectionate term for a “non-Jew,” the word has taken on disparaging connotations. Others pointed out that it creates a binary that is particularly hurtful to interfaith families and converts.

“As a Jew married to a Jew by choice, I definitely see goy as a slur — seldom used as a compliment, and never used in the presence of a non-Jew,” wrote Nahma Nadich, the deputy director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston. “That’s a good litmus test: if you wouldn’t use a word in the presence of someone you’re describing, good chance it’s offensive.”

That is true.

But it is also true that Jews don’t want non-Jews to know just how strongly their in-group sense is, and how much they view non-Jews as “the other.”

Which is really what this entire article is about.

Sobel explained that she was reacting to white supremacists who have embraced the word “goyim,” partly to accuse Jews of promoting their own brand of ethnic chauvinism and partly as a badge of twisted honor. But she also thanked those who responded for changing her thinking about the term.

Yes, they are very upset that we know about this word.

“Shut it down, the goyim know we call them goyim.”

“Goy can be weaponized to hurt interfaith families, converts, and patrilineal Jews,” she wrote. “We all have unique relationships to the term shaped by our experience. So grateful to have had so many people jump in on the conversation and tell me about theirs.”

I have a hard time seeing “goy” as anything but offensive.

…

The word “goy” has too much historical and linguistic baggage to be used as casually as “non-Jew” or “gentile.” It starts with the obvious slurs – like “goyishe kopf,” or gentile brains, which suggests (generously) a dullard, or “shikker iz a goy,” a gentile is a drunkard. “Goyishe naches” describes the kinds of things that a Jew mockingly presumes only a gentile would enjoy, like hunting, sailing and eating white bread.

…

How that came to be is the subject of a fascinating discussion in the current online edition of the scholarly journal Ancient Jew Review (the best name of any Jewish publication ever).

I agree that “Ancient Jew Review” is a good name.

I think it would be appropriate if the New York Times changed its name to “Ancient Jew Review.”

The occasion is the publication of a new book by the Israeli scholars Adi Ophir and Ishay Rosen-Zvi titled “Goy: Israel’s Multiple Others and the Birth of the Gentile” (Oxford University Press). In it they argue that while the word “goy” is common in the Torah, it was only in the later rabbinic literature (starting say, in the first and second centuries CE) that “goy” acquired the status of the absolute Other. From then until today, the word not only distinguishes what makes a gentile different than a Jew, but – and this is crucial — what defines a Jew as being different from a gentile.

What they actually believe is that we are animals created by their demon god Yahweh to serve them.

This isn’t debatable. It is documented fact they believe this. They just lie about it.

Ophir and Rozen-Zvi note that the rabbis don’t just distinguish between ways of religious thinking, but divide the world into a binary Us and Not Us.

“In contrast to earlier attempts to grapple with threatening foreign groups, the generalized and abstract rabbinic Goy has no other quality besides his being a non-Jew,” writes Yair Furstenberg, of the Talmud Department at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, in a response to their book.

…

In another response to the Israelis’ book, Cynthia Baker, a professor of religious studies at Bates College, aligns with those who believe that Jew-goy divisions “distort, deform, and diminish the full personhood of most of this world’s human inhabitants.”

They do not believe we are people at all. They believe we are non-actors who exist solely for their use.

Take that quote in light of the Trump presidency, and you will understand all of this.

Ophir and Rozen-Zvi also suggest that the Us and Them thinking of the rabbis tends to reinforce a sense of superiority among the Jews, and assigns to goyim qualities that, as Baker writes, “mark their lack of worthiness – and … none that are genuinely positive.”

At the very least, the idea of undifferentiated goyim shows an incredible lack of curiosity of the ways that non-Jews might differ among themselves, let alone how they differ from Jews.

Yes.

We are all no different than Palestinians to them, and they eagerly await the day when they can treat us all like they treat the Palestinians.

Just look at Chuck Schumer’s face.

Is that the face of someone who respects the goyim he rules over?

Jews are hardly alone in this exclusionary thinking. The Jew-goy distinction was born at a time when Jews were themselves excluded from the “nations,” and could barely imagine a society where people of various faiths and religions could live side by side on equal terms.

That doesn’t argue for getting rid of the “Pour out your fury on the goyim” section of the Haggadah. I’m a big believer in wrestling with the more difficult parts of the tradition rather than censoring them. But perhaps we should read such language with empathy for the Jewish condition at the time it was written — and acknowledge the ways our own conditions have changed.

Today we have the luxury and ability to think about the Other in ways that honor the Jews for their differences without disparaging others for theirs. We can do better than “goy.”

Wow.

They call for censoring the New Testament because it includes the historical fact that these filthy kikes murdered our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, but say they have a right to ritually chant that their demon god Yahweh destroy us.

This is a very, very weird article.

I’m glad I found it.

There are all sorts of interesting things in Jew-for-Jew publications. They used to only print this stuff in Yiddish, but now they’re mostly too stupid to read Yiddish, so they just put it all on the public internet.

If people would simply go read what the Jews write in their own publications, there would really be no need for the Daily Stormer. They really lay it all out there.

If you want to understand the typical use of the word “goyim,” watch the video I recently posted of a Jew woman screaming on a Russian bus that she is going to take the rest of the bus riders to the synagogue where her rabbi will murder and ritually dismember them.

In fact, this JTA article may well have been a response to me writing that article.

Jews read the Daily Stormer at least as much as Nazis read JTA.

And here I was thinking that kosher and halal food were basically the same thing.

Since virtually all rituals in Islam were ripped off from Jews.

JTA:

A Tunisian Jew who has been in prison for over a month is being denied access to kosher food, his family said.

Ilan Raccah, who is his 20s, has been held since July 10 at the prison of Mornaguia, a western suburb of the capital Tunis, the Kountrass news site reported Sunday. The report did not say precisely why Raccah was imprisoned except that he is suspected of inciting young men to set the car of a local businessman on fire.

The investigating judge assigned to the case allowed the family to bring kosher food to Raccah, whom they say adheres strictly to Orthodox Jewish law, or halachah. But the chief warden this weekend refused to take the kosher food from Raccah’s relatives, forcing him to fast, the family said.

This is an international news story.

The JTA is the Jewish wire service, and every Jew paper on the planet is going to hear about this single criminal Jew have a food crime done against him.

And they will go into action.

Now just imagine for a second if white people were willing to rally around a single white person to defend an injustice done to a single member of our in-group.

Obviously it is impossible to imagine. Because if we were anywhere near that level, we would be a completely different group of people. And already a space empire.