Previously: Pope Francis Blasts “Inflexible Ideologies” That Stop Progress Amid Anal Blessings Controversy

Yeah, well. No Pope ever in history would have done “anal marriage.” Even the Anti-Popes wouldn’t have done it.

This cannot be a Pope.

New York Post:

The Vatican marked the first anniversary on Sunday of the death of Pope Benedict XVI, with one of his closest aides saying he never would have approved a recent declaration allowing Catholic priests to bless same-sex couples.

Cardinal Gerhard Mueller, who was the Church’s doctrinal chief under Benedict, and Archbishop Georg Gaenswein, who was Benedict’s private secretary, both German, were two headliners at an event marking the anniversary and organized by the conservative U.S.-based Catholic television network EWTN.

“It never would have happened (under Benedict) because it was so ambiguous,” Mueller said on the sidelines of the event when asked by Reuters about the landmark declaration issued on Dec. 18.

Cardinal Gerhard Mueller

While the December declaration says such blessings cannot resemble the sacrament of matrimony between a man and a woman and cannot be part of rituals or liturgies, some advocates of more inclusion of LGBT people saw it as a possible precursor of same-sex marriage in the Church.

“There is no homosexual matrimony. It does not exist, it cannot exist, despite ideologies we have (today),” said Mueller, whom Francis removed as head of the Vatican’s doctrinal department after Benedict resigned in 2013.

…

Mueller said that while his personal relationship with Francis is “very good” he does not hesitate to disagree with him in public on doctrinal issues because “we are not in the Soviet Union where only one leader has a say.”

Mueller said “the best thing we can do for the pope is always to be close to the Catholic truth and faith and not to be here as adulators.”

Benedict might not have been perfect, but he was clearly more conservative than John Paul II, which is why he was removed. Hilariously, the cocksuckers blackmailed Benedict into resigning with gay shit. He had agreed to move priests who had been accused of abuse on a small scale.

Honestly, I don’t even think becoming a celibate priest is a bad idea for a person with homosexual drives. It’s logical enough. The problem is that if someone with those drives becomes a priest now, they are encouraged by the entire establishment of the Vatican to embrace the urges. Benedict said in his book published after his death that priests in America were doing faggot orgies.

It’s difficult to know what the answer to this problem is, but you cannot have an “Anal Pope.” The authority of this man is gone now. Just imagine what Saints Peter and Paul would say about this.

Imagine that either of them would say: “oh yes, he is pro-anal, and is literally bringing analists into the Church for ‘blessings,’ but you must respect his authority.”

Francis defenders are pressing the issue, claiming that this is valid, because they are not blessing anal, they are only blessing the brunch that the faggots have after a fisting session. But that means that they are saying that good can come from evil. It’s untrue. Nothing good results from anal sex. Surely, we’ve all had some exposure to faggots, and we all know that these men abuse one another. That is the only thing they do. Their relationship is based on anal, so every aspect of the relationship is rotten and deranged and above all, abusive and satanic.

I’m sorry if you wanted to believe the authority of the Pope is unimpeachable. Everyone has wanted to believe that for thousands of years. But you have a situation now where the Vatican is preaching that good can come from evil.

What’s more, they know that no one understands these lunatic confusing documents they’re releasing, and that most people reading the news think that the Church is now doing gay marriage inside the churches. Even if you believe that faggots can have true love whenever they are not pressing in each others’ shit – which is insane, by the way, but assuming you do agree with the Pope about that – you surely have to acknowledge that creating this scandal is evil.

The seat is vacant.

Pope Benedict XVI

This really shows you how fast the Church has changed its position on important issues, and its attitude towards degeneration, in only a few years.

AFP:

Traditionalist former pope Benedict XVI accuses opponents of wanting to “silence” him while associating gay marriage with “the Antichrist” and attacking “humanist ideologies” in a new authorised biography published Monday in Germany.

The 93-year-old, whose original name is Joseph Ratzinger, claims in “Benedict XVI – A Life” that he has fallen victim to a “malignant distortion of reality” in reactions to his interventions in theological debates.

“The spectacle of reactions coming from German theology is so misguided and ill-willed that I would prefer not to speak of it,” he says.

The former pope — who dramatically resigned in 2013 — was especially criticised for a 2018 text that was seen as critical of the Jewish faith.

“I would rather not analyse the actual reasons why people want to silence my voice,” Benedict says.

The German branch of the Catholic Church has for years been led by clergy more disposed to reform than the stringent traditionalism associated with Ratzinger.

In office from 2005-13, Benedict has frequently been criticised for his attitudes to Islam or to social questions, and is accused of attempting to undermine the modernisation drive of his successor Pope Francis.

Ratzinger attempts to counter such claims in the biography, saying his “personal friendship with Pope Francis has not only endured, but grown”.

…

“A century ago, anyone would have thought it absurd to talk about homosexual marriage. Today those who oppose it are excommunicated from society,” Benedict says.

“It’s the same thing with abortion and creating human life in the laboratory,” he says, adding that it’s “only natural” for people to “fear the spiritual power of the Antichrist” — an evil force seeking to supplant Jesus Christ.

“The real threat to the Church… is in the global dictatorship of purportedly humanist ideologies,” he warns.

What a stark contrast.

Today, everyone celebrates gay marriage, abortion, the “human” rights ideology of self-hate and self-harm, and all kinds of degeneracy while “Pope” Francis attempts to appear hip and cool.

What is Francis’ statement here?

Here’s a bit on the 2018 controversy, from USA Today, August 3, 2018:

The central point of debate is Benedict’s denial the Catholic Church ever adopted “supersessionism,” the theological belief that God’s covenant through Christ replaced the covenant God made with the Jewish people, and his insistence at the same time that the Christian lens for reading the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is the only valid one.

“Whoever describes the role of Judaism like this is building the foundation for a new anti-Semitism on a Christian basis,” said Rabbi Walter Homolka, executive director of the School of Jewish Theology at Potsdam University in Germany.

“Benedict’s suggestion that Christians should teach Jews how to read selected parts of the Hebrew Bible in a Christological way is very problematic,” said the Rev. Christian Rutishauser, head of the Jesuit order in Switzerland and an expert on Jewish-Christian relations.

Benedict pledged at his surprise 2013 resignation that he would remain “hidden from the world” and not get involved in church debates. He wrote his essay as a private text last fall and passed it on to Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews, who read it and convinced him to publish it.

Critics say the recent essay seems to walk back efforts in the past half-century to undo the Catholic Church’s long history of anti-Semitism. After nearly two millennia of hostility, the Catholic Church’s Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) acknowledged Christianity’s close historical ties with Judaism and absolved Jews of the stereotype of being “Christ killers.”

…

An association of Christian-Jewish dialogue groups said Benedict’s essay undermines Vatican teaching since the 1960s and even contradicts declarations he had made as pope.

Ask yourself what weights more: two millennia of acknowledging that the Jews killed Jesus, or 60 years of corruption?

The answer should be clear to anyone not blinded by the Progress spell.