John Kerry calls for a Ministry of Truth:

“The 1st Amendment stands as a major roadblock for us right now” pic.twitter.com/1mtpjjxeM7

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 29, 2024

Well.

This is certainly saying the quiet part aloud.

RT:

The freedom for individuals to choose their sources of information makes it difficult to govern effectively, former US Secretary of State John Kerry has said.

Speaking at a World Economic Forum (WEF) panel on Green Energy last week, Kerry criticized the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects freedom of speech and the press. 

“It’s really hard to govern today,” he remarked, arguing that social media poses challenges for building consensus in democracies. 

“The referees we used to have to determine what is fact and what isn’t have kind of been eviscerated,” Kerry stated, adding that individuals now decide where to get their news.

“If people go to only one source… and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to simply hammering it out of existence,” added Kerry, who served as secretary of state under Barack Obama. 

As long as Democrats can “win ground” and “win the right to govern,” they will be “free to implement change,” the former senator stated.

“I think democracies are very challenged right now and have not proven they can move fast enough or big enough to address the challenges we face. To me, that is part of what this race, this election, is all about,” he added.

I have been saying for over a decade that free speech is incompatible with democracy, and here you have one of the top global advocates for democracy saying the exact same thing.

They actually say different versions of this quite regularly, though this is a particularly brutal admission from Kerry, with even a vow to crush the First Amendment.

If democracy means “voting,” as they claim, then I would think most people would be willing to sacrifice that “right” in exchange for freedom and prosperity.

I can’t imagine that even the people out there talking about the importance of voting actually believe it. It’s become a stupid game that no one takes seriously.

Democracy must end. Humans have a right to freedom. No system gives unlimited freedom, but the brutality of democracy, crushing any vestige of freedom, is unsustainable. If we continue with this anti-human system of democracy, we will no longer be humans, instead mere slaves to vague abstractions promoted by Jews who never believed we were humans in the first place.

Stealing the Australian contract from France was the biggest inter-Atlantic diplomatic row since WWII. That’s not really an exaggeration. France recalled their ambassadors from US and Australia.

The best part was when John Kerry went on TV and said that Brandon wasn’t even aware that this had happened, like a week after.

JUST IN: White House Climate Envoy John Kerry went viral on Tuesday after telling French television that Joe Biden was unaware of the spat between the U.S. and France as it fueled last month. pic.twitter.com/CAYO7SZv4X

— Personal Blog Media News (@pbmnews) October 6, 2021

That’s senility to the point of a nursing home patient forgetting that their spouse is dead.

Saying anything is “insane” at this point is pointless, but that was really wacky.

Anyway, I guess they’re about to do it again?

This strategy doesn’t make any sense really… short story: France and America are both part of the same super-governmental and super-economic super-structure, so it’s basically like ripping off one of your siblings. Yeah, there’s money for Lockheed, but the money can’t make up for the crushing of good will. It only really makes sense as just stupid, bad policy.

RT:

The United States has approved a massive arms sale to Greece, offering four new frigates and a major modernization package worth up to $9.4 billion, directly challenging a similar preliminary agreement with France.

The US State Department said it approved the potential deals on Friday, announcing the offer of several Multi-Mission Surface Combatant (MMSC) ships in addition to a separate $2.5 billion plan to modernize Greece’s MEKO Class Frigates.

“This proposed sale will support the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States by helping to improve the security of a NATO ally, which is an important partner for political stability and economic progress in Europe,” the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said.

If executed, the scheme to update Greece’s frigate fleet would include the installation of a number of new systems, such as new five-inch artillery cannons and upgraded sonar. Arms dealers Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, VSE Corporation and the UK’s BAE Systems would serve as the primary contractors.

The announced proposal comes after France declared in September that it had reached a similar agreement with Greece to provide up to four new frigates for $3.4 billion (€3 billion). At the time, however, French military spokesman Herve Grandjean said that while some commitments had been made, no formal contract was yet signed between the two sides. He added that the deal would be finalized after a period of three months, a deadline set to mature sometime in the coming weeks.

Though it is yet unclear what the US proposal will mean for France’s deal, the move could be interpreted as a major slight by Washington, which already invoked the country’s ire earlier this year after unveiling a nuclear submarine deal with Australia despite a preexisting arrangement with Paris.

Republican neocons and the remaining morons on Twitter (Jack Posobiec, Paul Joseph Watson, etc.) will talk about how Biden is “alienating our allies.” Of course, these are the same people who supported Trump going ape on NATO, so they really are just totally partisan hacks.

But it’s true that Biden is alienating our allies, and I support that. France has been a wildcard since at least the collapse of the Roman Empire, so they’re really the favorite one I want to be pissed off. Even bankster shill Macron has been shown to be an unhinged lunatic who will take bizarre and confusing actions at random, like spinning a wheel.

So, unlike Republican partisan hacks, I want the allies of the American empire alienated and spinning wheels, because I support America being taken over by… am I even allowed to write this?

I’m so, so careful when it comes to Brandenberg v. Ohio, which is why even though I’ve never met a genocide I didn’t think sounded like a great idea, I’ve never been charged with any kind of incitement or any other bullshit, in my nearly decade of posting.

But when it comes to “I hope America loses a war” – I’m not really clear on these rules. I’m pretty sure that as long as no war is declared, I can’t be charged with sedition.

How bizarre is it that people who literally hate America and openly say they want to destroy it support all of these wars, and I, as an American nationalist who loves my country second only to God supports it losing a war?

Anyone who understands the dynamics of the situation understands that both the Jews and myself are being completely consistent, but still – what a strange new world?

Glenn Greenwald may have won the award for the most important for the article of 2021, but the award for cleverest lede goes to Natalie O’Neill of the New York Post.

This Texas freeze and power outage is probably the funniest thing that has ever happened on earth, so it is fitting that a story about it would have the funniest lede.

New York Post:

Texans say energy companies are on a power trip.

Electric bills in the Lone Star State skyrocketed to as high as $17,000 per month after a historic storm and power outage sparked a high demand for heat, according to reports Friday.

Dallas-area resident Ty Williams was hit with sticker shock when his monthly bill soared from $600 last month to nearly $17,000 so far this  month, according to the local station WFAA.

“How in the world can anyone pay that? I mean you go from a couple hundred dollars a month…there’s absolutely no way‚ it makes no sense,” Williams, who said he received the bill from the energy firm Griddy.

The price of power in Texas spiked from $50 to $9,000 per Megawatt in some cases due to the supply and demand disaster, according to the station.

Customers with so-called “variable or indexed” electricity plans in Texas — the only state to run its own unique stand-alone electricity grid  — are partially controlled by market demand.

Just so you understand what happened here:

1. Texas installed windmills because the federal government says that the weather is getting too hot because of coal power.
2. Texas experienced the coldest weather in history.
3. The windmills, installed to fight hot weather, froze.

So it’s a very funny series of events.

People like John Kerry are now switching things up, and saying that global warming is going to cause colder weather.

Global warming is actually a total hoax, and the weather of the planet has always been changing. Humans are destroying the environment in some ways, but this has nothing to do with carbon dioxide. It has to do with water pollution, primarily from plastic and Monsanto chemicals used for farming (pesticides and fertilizers), and from deforestation, primarily in the third world.

But fixing those problems wouldn’t require people to pay taxes to a global government. In fact, fixing real environmental problems wouldn’t give governments any new powers at all. So instead of fixing real environmental problems, governments are ignoring real environmental problems and promoting the hoax problem of carbon dioxide changing the weather.

It is totally and completely fake, and it is disgusting that people like Ted Cruz are out there saying it’s real.

Well, I’ll be gosh-darned.

He’s back!

The Guardian:

John Kerry, the former US secretary of state and Democratic presidential nominee, has been named as a special envoy on the climate crisis under Joe Biden’s incoming administration.

Biden’s transition team said Kerry would “fight climate change full time” in the role, which for the first time will include a seat on the national security council.

This elevation shows the president-elect sees the climate crisis as an “urgent national security issue”, the Biden transition team said.

Kerry tweeted that “America will soon have a government that treats the climate crisis as the urgent national security threat it is.” The former Massachusetts senator, who ran for president in 2004, added that he will work with Biden, US allies and the climate movement to address the “crisis” of global heating.

As secretary of state, Kerry played a prominent role in the international effort to craft the Paris climate agreement, which commits countries to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to avoid disastrous storms, heatwaves, flooding and other looming climate threats.

I don’t know whether to play the Cheers theme song or the Mary Tyler Moore Show theme song, so I’m just gonna play them both.

I’ll tell ya what, it’s just so good to have John Kerry back in town.

I feel like I’m in a place where everyone knows my name, and I am certain that we’re all gonna make it after all.

John Kerry (Cohn) can turn the world on with his smile.

If anybody can change the weather with a global tax scheme, it’s gonna be him.

All of our best friends are back.

We’ve entered now into a joyous memory of the world before the orange man, when everything was happy all the time.

Another walking corpse, 76-year-old John Kerry, has apparently been toying with getting the band back together for one last ride into the sunset.

It is incredible to me that no one is complaining about the fact that news articles about boomers have removed the standard journalistic practice of listing a man’s age.

NBC News:

Former Secretary of State John Kerry — one of Joe Biden’s highest-profile endorsers — was overheard Sunday on the phone at a Des Moines hotel explaining what he would have to do to enter the presidential race amid “the possibility of Bernie Sanders taking down the Democratic Party — down whole.”

Sitting in the lobby restaurant of the Renaissance Savery hotel, Kerry was overheard by an NBC News analyst saying “maybe I’m f—ing deluding myself here” and explaining that in order to run, he’d have to step down from the board of Bank of America and give up his ability to make paid speeches. Kerry said donors like venture capitalist Doug Hickey would have to “raise a couple of million,” adding that such donors “now have the reality of Bernie.”

Asked about the call later on Sunday, Kerry said that he was “absolutely not” contemplating joining the Democratic primary race. He reiterated this sentiment in a tweet later, saying that “any report otherwise is f—ing (or categorically) false.” Minutes later, he deleted the tweet and reposted it without the expletive.

Why would he put the f-word in a tweet?

Probably because he’s a senile boomer.

He told NBC News later on Sunday that, “This is a complete and total misinterpretation based on overhearing only one side of a phone conversation. A friend who watches too much cable called me wondering whether I’d ever jump into the race late in the game if Democrats were choosing an unelectable nominee. I listed all the reasons I could not possibly do that and would not — and will not under any circumstances — do that.”

It’s not clear how serious Kerry was on the call about jumping into the race. But that he would even discuss the possibility suggests that prominent members of the Democratic Party remain deeply unsettled by the current field, Sanders’ strength in the polls, and the ability of any candidate to defeat President Donald Trump.

It also suggests that Kerry, who has campaigned with Biden in Iowa and New Hampshire, may be nervous about the former vice president’s chances ahead of Monday’s first-in-the-nation primary caucuses. At a North Liberty, Iowa, campaign event on Saturday, Kerry spoke both after and for longer than Biden did.

Clearly, the entire party is concerned about the stability of Joe Biden, and the situation is shockingly similar to the 2016 Republican situation. Jeb Bush was the presumed nominee before the show started and then he lost like a quantum robot designed to lose things.

Both Jeb Bush and Joe Biden were designed to lose things – they were designed to lose the general election. They were supposed to win the primaries, but when you have a being designed to lose, it can start losing early.

Now, the Democrats are facing the same fate that the GOP faced when a weird outsider ran up on them and captured the standard of the party. Bernie Sanders may or may not win the general election – most likely, he will not – but the fact that he is on course to win the nomination means that he will permanently alter the status quo within the party. After having Bernie as the standard bearer, the Democrats will not be able to roll things back to business as usual.

The fact that outsider figures can so easily take over either party really goes to show just how weak and broken the American “democracy” system is. The people of both parties have been forced for decades to vote not for their own party, but against the other party. Fear politics have been used on both sides to get people out to the polls to pull the lever for things they do not believe in.

Republicans fear abortion, gun control and high taxes. Democrats fear abortion control, guns and entitlement cuts. These are superficial issues in the great scheme of things, and the emotional connection of the American people to these things has allowed a corporation-dominated Jewish war machine to roll over the population.

The shocking thing is that the reasons Democrats like Bernie are very similar to the reasons that Republicans liked Trump.

Both 2016 Trump and 2020 Bernie were/are:

• Anti-war
• Anti-free trade
• Anti-government establishment (big party, mainstream politicians, intelligence agencies, bureaucracy)
• Pro-economic bolstering of the middle class

Before 2020, Bernie was even more like Trump, supporting strict border controls and opposing all forms of gun control. He’s been bullied out of these positions, but the fact that he held them into his 70s speaks to the kind of figure he is and what he represents.

It all could lead a person to believe that there should be a third party in America that opposes both of these main two corporate/Jew parties by combining elements of right and left populism.

This is obviously a fantasy, given that people are simply so responsive to the media, and given that the tech oligarchs have done such a brilliant job in shutting down alternative media. People will continue to be emotionally instigated on both sides, and refuse to come together with people they’ve been propagandized into believing are evil.

But it really is a shame.

I can picture a situation in which the people could come together around a movement that was:

• Anti-corporation
• Anti-war
• Anti-globalism
• Anti-immigration
• Pro-free healthcare
• Pro-student loan abolishment
• Pro-environmentalism
• Pro-video game

It isn’t going to happen.

But I will continue to dream of a Carlson/Gabbard ticket in 2024.

Both Hillary Clinton and John Kerry have come out against the 2015 migrant invasion as Angela Merkel is stepping down.

Shockingly, the US Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, was allowed to go on the Tucker Carlson Show and talk about this situation Wednesday night.

There was comparison made between the 2015 Euro situation and that present American situation.

The Ambassador did the whole cuckservative routine of “this is about legal vs illegal immigration,” and once again gave the shocking number of 1 million people being given American citizenship every year.

I have of course argued that there does need to be a distinction between legal and illegal immigration, in that we need to recognize that in America, at least up until this point, legal immigration has been a much, much bigger problem than illegal immigration. Of course, that may change, because the Trump administration has had a good deal of success in scaling back legal immigration.

I don’t know if 1 million given citizenship is the current number. You can look that up yourself if you want, but I’ve tried to confirm it and there aren’t clear numbers. What is clear is that President Trump has successfully blocked a lot of so-called refugees, H1-B visa applicants and diversity lotto winners from entering the country over the last year.

And with this mounting border crisis, it could actually become the case that illegal immigration is a bigger problem than legal immigration. The clear plan is to do to us exactly what was done to Europe, and move millions of people from Latin America, mostly Central America (given that the majority of Mexicans who want to come here are already here), into the United States by marching them like an army through Mexico and over our border.

If this is successful, they will then begin marching people all the way from South America up.

And then maybe incidentally the cuckservatives will be right, and illegal immigration will be the main concern.

Previously, however, people have just rallied around illegal immigration because it is a way to say “I’m not racist, I support giving my entire country over to brown people through legal immigration.”

Furthermore, a lot working and middle class whites opposed to immigration are not really aware that the overwhelming majority of nonwhites flooding the country are actually legal immigrants. There has been a thing where they just assume that these people must be illegal, because it cannot be possible that the talking heads of Fox News would be supporting them.

President Trump and Tucker Carlson have done a good job bringing focus onto the problem of legal immigration, but it remains a fact that it is easier to stir-up public outrage against illegal immigration.

Shifting the Discussion

Tucker will always use the word “demographics,” which is obviously a euphemism for “race.”

But as we see with this Ambassador, this “legal vs illegal” dichotomy is still very much a talking point being used.

I would like to see the argument be instead for a complete shut down on all immigration, from everywhere. Trump talked in the campaign about Moslems specifically, then was eventually able to enact a form of his Moslem ban. It wasn’t a great form of it, but it was at least some form of it.

But the fact of the matter is that the overwhelming majority of people coming in are nonwhite. The other fact of the matter is that we do not even need more white people in America. In general, we need fewer people, period. A skills-based immigration platform would appear to limit immigration to white people, but there are so many people in brown countries with credentials, given that brown countries have such lower education standards, that it is easy to slip them through a “skilled immigrants only” system.

Moreover, there are an increasing number of Chinese who actually would legitimately meet credential standards, in that they would be competent and self-sufficient. However, the Chinese are a plague, and if you allow them in they will buy up all of your property and take over your country.

China and India – both having huge legal immigrant populations in America – have bought up huge swaths of America, and these assets will need to be stripped from them at some point.

Furthermore, European populations are becoming rapidly brown, so even if you had a system to favor European passport holders, you would have a lot of brown people coming in.

Sometime in the future, I think we could establish a visa free system for first world white countries, assuming they don’t continue to give passports to hordes of nonwhites who are flooding their countries.

Whatever happens in the future, right now the rallying cry needs to be “shut it down.” We need to completely stop all people entering the country, point-blank, and focus on figuring out how to remove people who are already here.

If we could manage to outlaw birthright citizenship, then we could eventually get a ruling declaring that those who gained citizenship through that system were awarded their citizenship through fraud, and must have it revoked.

Then we would have to move to declare the entirety of the 1965 immigration act invalid, and start removing citizenship from those people, many of whom are from Asia, Africa and the Middle East, as well as Latin America.

The fact of the matter is that we are going to hit an electoral wall in the not too distant future where it will simply be impossible for whites to win national elections, and at that point we are going to be without any clear options to create a white-dominated America through the ballot box, and will be forced into some kind of wartime scenario.

That isn’t to say that I believe that whites will rise up because of their own displacement – I do not think they will do that. We can look at South Africa and see that even when whites are being slaughtered, they will simply beg forgiveness and say they’re not racist. But in America, once brown people become the majority and control all national elections, they will bring a war to us.

The United Nations, the non-binding world parliament of color, has denounced Israel for the 6,000,000th time. Ordinarily this is not news. See the boilerplate below for just how routine this particular resolution (2334) was:

Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions

…

Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements… has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace.

Israel continues to colonize the West Bank, the third-worldist voter bloc in the UN musters more than enough support to symbolically condemn Israel because demographics can only be altered in favor of third world peoples, a maelstrom of kvetching ensues, nothing happens, etc.

What is different is that the United States, in its last days under the Obama administration, has seen fit to abandon Our Greatest Ally by not blocking a UN resolution. For the first time in recent diplomatic history, Israel has been deprived of its faithful golem. At least, that is how the shrieking zionist lobby and their politicians in the United States see it.

Fear not neurotic skypes, for this will pass in a couple of weeks. President-Elect Donald J. Trump made it clear in several tweets that his administration would be firmly behind Israel, and in a cringy mix of slobbering and paternalistic gaze said that the Israelis need only wait until January 20, 2017. What of America First? Trump has always made it clear that whatever Israel wants is a priority—even at the cost of an independent foreign policy.

President Trump also condemned the UN (for the wrong reasons) and suggested he would approach that body differently than his predecessor. Indeed, it is hard to imagine him being anything but hostile to the left-of-center UN, given that the international luegenpresse have anointed him an illegitimate president and Literally Hitler. They’ve framed President Trump such that his platform would be against the UN’s charter were it carried out. The least popular man in the UN—other than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu—I am sure will get along just fine with the General Assembly:

Resolved, that since the unlawful President of the United States has repeatedly imposed discrimination based on national origins, racism, sexism, and white supremacy on its citizens…

Hey, stranger things have happened this current year.

The other major reaction came from Obama’s Secretary of State and failed presidential candidate John Kerry (notice a pattern?). He gave a speech defending the American abstention from the vote, drawing condemnation from Israel and the kosher right. Kerry begins by outlining the basic American foreign policy, which is nominally to support both Jewish nationalism and Palestinian nationalism:

[T]he two state solution is the only way to achieve a just and lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. It is the only way to ensure Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state, living in peace and security with its neighbors. It is the only way to ensure a future of freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people. And it is an important way of advancing U.S. interests in the region.

Kerry goes on to explain that the abstention was not meant to anger the Jews but a means of maintaining the two state solution that he believes is best for them:

They fail to recognize that this friend, the United States… cannot be true to our own values — or even the stated democratic values of Israel — and we cannot properly defend and protect Israel — if we allow a viable two state solution to be destroyed before our eyes. And that’s the bottom line: the vote in the UN was about preserving the two state solution. That’s what we were standing up for: Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state, living side by side in peace and security with its neighbors.

Kerry’s schizophrenic mix of byzantinism and sincerity is something to behold. He points out that America has sacrificed for Israel more than ever before under the Obama administration, in an attempt to dress up the fact that he has committed a cuck faux pas (not doing precisely what a foreign power wanted):

In the midst of our own financial crisis and budget deficits, we repeatedly increased funding to support Israel. In fact, more than half of our entire global Foreign Military Financing goes to Israel. And this fall, we concluded an historic 38 billion dollar Memorandum of Understanding that exceeds any military assistance package the U.S. has provided to any country, at any time, and that will invest in cutting edge missile defense, and sustain Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge for years to come. This commitment to Israel’s security is very personal for me.

Most interesting are Kerry’s remarks on the one-state solution:

But here is a fundamental reality: if the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic – it cannot be both… The Israeli Prime Minister publicly supports a two state solution, but his current coalition is the most right wing in Israeli history… policies of this government – which the Prime Minister himself just described as “more committed to settlements than any in Israel’s history” – are leading in the opposite direction, towards one state. In fact, Israel has increasingly consolidated control over much of the West Bank for its own purposes… Let’s be clear: settlement expansion has nothing to do with Israel’s security; many settlements actually increase the security burden on the IDF. And leaders of the settler movement are motivated by ideological imperatives that entirely ignore legitimate Palestinian aspirations… There are over 80 settlements east of the separation barrier, many located in places that would make a contiguous Palestinian state impossible… So if there is only one state, you would have millions of Palestinians permanently living in segregated enclaves in the middle of the West Bank… separate but unequal.

It is clear that under Obama-Kerry, the United States currently favors the two-state solution because it would preserve:

1. Israel’s status as a Jewish state, that is to say the exclusive territory of an ethno-religious group which has total control over who enters and exits
2. Democracy, which for Israel means parliamentary rule, a set of universal human rights for everyone under its flag, and normalized peaceful diplomacy with its neighbors.

The problem is that Israel wants lebensraum and that the United States is obligated to obey the zionist lobby because of the way political donations work in Washington. This causes obvious tension since the ideology of the left that permeates the still-ruling Democratic party is one of anti-nationalism and “anti-discrimination.” It is patently obvious that Israeli expansion into the West Bank consists of making the territory more Jewish and worsening the odds of a two-state solution by breaking down the ethno-geographic continuity of Palestine, a Jewish nationalist policy. Doing so privileges Jewish colonists above Arab indigenes, therefore it is clearly unacceptable. Kerry cites the American civil rights movement, calling the one-state result of the settlement policy “separate but unequal.”

The Democrats must give lip service to the Palestinian cause even while supporting Israel, because Likudnik ultra-zionism runs contrary to their third-worldism. Even when Kerry talks about the Palestinians, the creation of their state is only a means to keep Israel Jewish and democratic (i.e. Jewish-majority without discriminating too much against goyim). In that regard he is a bit like (((George Soros))), who is very much concerned with the ability of Jews to live in Europe or the United States without Israeli policies hung around their necks like an albatross. But Kerry, as the highest-ranking American diplomat, is concerned about the states themselves rather than the Jewish diaspora, and therefore wants to support Israel while having the United States be seen as supporting democracy. If Israel continues to aggressively pursue the one-state solution while saying it wants a two-state solution, an example of trademark Jewish duplicity, it damages the diplomatic capital of the United States to support it.

Put simply:

1. Leftists interpret Israel as a White European colonial power.
2. Colonialism is wrong because it displaces people of color.
3. Palestinians are obviously a non-white third world population.
4. The United States and the rest of the international community are third-worldists who view the interests of people of color as morally superior to those of White people.
5. The UN (and the United States under Obama-Kerry) insists that Israel not pursue nationalistic policies in the Palestinian territories because that would be colonialism.

Recall that the UN labelled zionism  a form of “racism” during the Cold War, and has never failed to condemn Israel when the opportunity arises. Unironically they hold that Palestinian nationalism is not racism because Palestinians are considered people of color. Saying Israel has to choose between being Jewish and democratic is thus the parting shot of the Obama administration, the most third-worldist government the United States has had to date. Obama did not have the power to cut Israel off, but he never missed an opportunity to snub a state created by the same people (in his mind) who colonized his ancestral home of Kenya. This was his last opportunity to do so, so he took it.

As for what the United States should actually do? Defund the UN and Israel.

Hello darkness my old friend…

It is clearly important to John Kerry that he has in his written in his political legacy that he was able to save ISIS terrorists from the evil barrel-bomber Bashir Assad and thus ensure human rights and democracy thrive in Syria.

He’s rolling hard now, with time running out.

RT:

US Secretary of State John Kerry has significantly intensified contacts with Russia on Syria, the Kremlin confirmed, substantiating a report that Kerry wants to seal a deal with Moscow before Donald Trump assumes the US presidency in January.

The report, by Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin, says Kerry is taking a last-ditch effort to stop the Syrian operation in eastern Aleppo, because the Trump administration may “squarely on the side of dictator [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad.”

Russian presidential aide Yury Ushakov confirmed that Kerry has lately intensified contacts with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov on Syria.

“This [effort] could be called unbelievable, in terms that there have never been so many phone calls between the Secretary of State and Russia’s FM which were focused on discussing a single issue – Syria,” he told journalists. Ushakov refrained from commenting on whether there was any progress on it.

According to the Post piece, which cites four unnamed US officials with the knowledge of the situation, Kerry hopes to seal a localized ceasefire in Aleppo by offering to separate members of the so-called moderate opposition from terrorist groups like Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (formerly Al-Nusra Front). The report says Kerry brought in other nations like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and at times Iran in a bid to seal the deal.

“Officials acknowledge that a frustrated Kerry still has not been given authority by the White House to bring any meaningful pressure to bear against Assad or Russia, placing him in a weak negotiating position. The prospect of Hillary Clinton being elected president gave Kerry some leverage, because she was expected to pursue a more hawkish Syria policy,” Rogin wrote.

A ceasefire in Aleppo on Kerry’s terms may be a hard bargain to sell. For once, Russia insists that US failure to separate moderates from terrorists, which was a key point of the truce negotiated by Moscow and Washington in September, was the reason that ceasefire collapsed.

The Syrian government operation to retake eastern Aleppo from armed groups also appears to be progressing, with latest reports saying that the militants lost a third of their territories to the advancing army. Stopping the siege now may give those fighters time to regroup, rearm and mount a counteroffensive.

Moscow appears to be reluctant to strike any significant deal with the outgoing administration and is waiting for Trump to present all the key figures in his future government.

“We will patiently wait for that team to take their seats and then we are interested in having intensive dialogue with them,” Ushakov said.

Yeah.

Kerry bet everything on Hillary, like all of these bastards did, and he lost.

His legacy will be what it already was, except worse: he is a complete failure, who accomplished absolutely nothing in his career, other than creating a bunch of weird problems.

A face you can trust.

How dare these Russians impudently move around their troops inside of their country?

Don’t they realize their military presence is a threat to all of the NATO bases massed close to their borders?

Frankly, if the Russians cared at all for the stability of Europe, they would move all their equipment and soldiers to Siberia, in order for John Kerry to feel safer about building up his attack force.

The Independent:

The deployment of Russian missiles on the Polish border “is destabilising to European security,” the US State Department has warned.

Let’s be clear here.

By the “Polish border,” he’s referring to a military base within the Russian territory.

A military base that’s been one of the Russia’s most active for decades.

This isn’t exactly a new phenomenon.

Moscow said will deploy S-400 surface-to-air missiles and nuclear-capable Iskander missiles in the exclave of Kaliningrad over “concern” about Nato expansion.

“Russia has made threats to move its Iskander missiles to Kaliningrad for the past decade in response to a variety of developments in Europe, none of which demand such a military response,” State Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters.

NATO has been expanding for years, inching progressively closer to Russia over time.

An example of Russian aggression!

“We call on Russia to refrain from words or deeds that are inconsistent with the goal of promoting security and stability,” he added.

His comments came in response to the head of the defence committee in Russia’s upper house of parliament saying the Kremlin was forced to react to the planned deployment of Nato’s US-led missile shield in eastern Europe.

Is deploying a new weapon-system at Russia’s doorstep “consistent with the goal of promoting security and stability,” you lying traitor?

“As response measures to such threats we will have… to deploy additional forces… This reinforcement includes deployment of S-400 and Iskander systems in Kaliningrad,” the state-run RIA news agency quoted Viktor Ozerov as saying.

You don’t want to mess with S400 platforms. They’ll really ruin your day.

So, NATO is putting a missile system close to Russia. Then Russia puts their own missile system nearby, so that they can defend against this act of aggression.

And of course, Russia is supposed to be the bad guy here.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow was “concerned by Nato’s decision making” in an interview broadcast on Monday.

“Why are we reacting to Nato expansion so emotionally? We are concerned by Nato’s decision making,” Mr Putin said.

“What should we do? We have, therefore, to take countermeasures, which means to target with our missile systems the facilities, that, in our opinion, start posing a threat to us,” he added.

Hopefully, Kerry and his ilk won’t be able to escalate things beyond the point of no-return before Trump can get in power.

Putin knows that Trump will be cooperative, and won’t be looking to start hostilities.

But these Jews might want to hand Trump a catastrophic situation as his term begins in order to undermine him.

We’ll see.

Ever seen a more punchable face? This guy is in charge of “negotiating” with Russia.

What do you do when you’re in charge of a world superpower, and you’re in the middle of a volatile situation which could potentially lead to a war that will annihilate all civilization?

You carefully weight all diplomatic options, and keep in close contact with all parties to prevent misunderstandings which would set off the powder keg.

But what if you actually want to destroy everything? For the lulz? Or maybe after a temper tantrum?

Then, you do stuff like this, I guess.

Business Insider:

The US has formally suspended its bilateral channels with Russia over the continued Russian aerial bombardment of Syria’s largest city, Aleppo, State Department spokesman John Kirby confirmed in a statement released Monday.

“This was not a decision that was taken lightly,” the statement said.

Insider sources have confided that one strategist thought so hard about this, his head literally exploded. No joke.

“The US spared no effort in negotiating and attempting to implement an arrangement with Russia aimed at reducing the violence, providing unhindered humanitarian access, and degrading terrorist organizations operating in Syria.

Did you propose ceasing to fund and arm the terrorists?

Did you propose withdrawing from your illegal operations in Syria?

How about recognizing the legitimacy of the elected Syrian government, and abandoning your relentless attempts to have it overthrown by foreign “rebels?”

No? Nothing? Mmhh.

“Unfortunately, Russia failed to live up to its own commitments,” the statement continued. “Including its obligations under international humanitarian law and UNSCR 2254.”

UNSCR 2254 is the UN Security Council Resolution adopted in December 2015 calling for a cease-fire and political settlement in Syria.

Did the terrorists lay down their arms and disband?

No they didn’t.

Therefore, the resolution is completely meaningless, and even bringing it up is very disingenuous.

We must make peace with these gentlemen. Lay down your arms first. I’m sure they’ll follow.

This is very simple. Russia is helping the legitimate government of Syrian in fighting foreign terrorists. America is giving aid and shelter to those terrorists.

There’s no negotiations to be had here. It’s just a game of chicken.

You sure you wanna play chicken with Russia, Nightrider?