John Friend has been fired for his beliefs.

Friend, you might remember, I used to be friends with. Though I still think he’s a very nice person – “Friendly Friend,” we used to call him – I decided to professionally distance myself from him due to his focus on conspiracy theories.

However, here he is on my site now, as he has been fired from his job for his personal beliefs, which is insane and obviously illegal (or would have been, if he wouldn’t have walked into the trap – see below).

San Diego Union Tribune:

A 29-year-old clerical employee in the Escondido City Manager’s Office was forced out of his job this week after city officials learned he operates an anti-Semitic website and is active in a movement that blames Jews for the 9/11 terror attacks.

Poway resident John Friend was hired by Escondido about three months ago as a division coordinator, which is responsible for a variety of administrative duties in the City Manager’s Office including supervising support staff and helping develop office policies and procedures, according to the city’s website.

Three months is a pretty good run.

Potok is losing his edge.

City officials said they were unaware at the time that Friend is an outspoken blogger and contributor to several white supremacist publications.

Friend told a reporter he finds “inspiration and guidance from America’s Founding Fathers” as well as “white Christian patriots” such as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels.

Heresy!

The Found Fathers owned slaves!

City Manager Clay Phillips said he was unaware of Friend’s activism until a reporter began asking questions about it on Tuesday and a second person called in the same tip.

Friend — an “at will” employee for the city — said he was called into his supervisor’s office on Wednesday and given the option of stepping down or being fired. He chose to resign.

That was actually entrapment, John. And a bluff. You should have called a lawyer. Or me.

If you would have demanded to be fired, at worst you’d have a job still and at best you’d have a sweet lawsuit. Now you just have no lawsuit, no job and media publicity which will keep you from getting another one.

Didn’t you get suspicious when they gave you a choice between two things which ostensibly had the exact same outcome?

Let this be a lesson to everyone: whenever you don’t know what’s going on, call a lawyer. Or at least say “I’m going to need to talk to a lawyer.”

Phillips said he could not comment in detail about the situation because it’s a personnel issue.

However, he said, “John worked in this office and I did find out about some of his writings on the Internet and it certainly raises concerns for the city and for me personally as his boss.”

Sources said Friend kept his political beliefs quiet while working and was generally well liked in the office.

…

Friend said while he is highly critical of the federal government, he was impressed with the leaders and employees of Escondido and that he enjoyed his time there.

“To my knowledge, no one in the office had complained about me, and I was unaware of any complaints emanating from the outside public relating to my work performance,” he said.

John, meet the “outside public”:

John Friend’s website is The Realist Report. It’s about 80% great stuff, 20% total tinfoil. I read it myself.

A rather revealing article recently appeared in The Times of Israel, offering us – once again – a unique insight into the twisted, depraved, and totally warped worldview and agenda of the organized Jewish community and their promotion of the fake “Holocaust” narrative of WWII. The fake “Holocaust” story is a central aspect of Jewish identity and, due to the Jewish ownership of the mass media, Hollywood, and government, has become a central aspect of Western identity as well. This false historical narrative has literally been weaponized and used against not only the German people, but all of Western civilization, in an overall Jewish-led campaign to invert our very reality and Western identity.

The “Holocaust” story truly is the “central moral icon” of Western civilization today, as Dr. Kevin MacDonald eloquently explains in his must-read book Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements. However, the Jewish community is facing a major problem. Most of the “Holocaust survivors” and “eye witnesses” of “Nazi atrocities” – who are paraded in front of the cameras and school children in order to sell this fabricated story of a “Jewish genocide” carried out by Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist Germany during WWII – are dying out.

After going dark for two weeks during the government shutdown, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum reopened on Thursday, resuming commemorative programs for its 20th anniversary.

The museum was one of many prominent sites in Washington and elsewhere to have been closed by the early October budget impasse. On Wednesday night, Congress voted to fully reopen the government.

More than 60,000 visitors would have toured the Holocaust Museum during the shutdown, according to its administrators.

“Every day the museum is closed is a lost opportunity to educate our public,” long-time museum director Sara Bloomfield told The Times of Israel, mid-way through the shutdown.

More than 60,000 visitors would have toured the Holocaust Museum during the shutdown.

Bloomfield joined the museum in 1986, during its planning stages, and saw a similar government shutdown close the building in 1995. Relentlessly optimistic, she pivots to the positive aspect of operating through a government appropriation.

“One of the most important things about our institution is that we are part of the US government,” Bloomfield said. “We are here forever, permanent, and we want to be able to permanently deal with and educate a global audience.”

Got that? The fake “Holocaust” story, and the entire “Holocaust industry” which has arisen to promote this totally fabricated narrative, is “here forever” and is meant to “permanently deal with and educate a global audience” (read: indoctrinate) with a wholly manufactured, fake version of history that is part of an on-going anti-German propaganda campaign dating back to WWWI.

The article continues:

During two decades of operation, the museum has been visited by 36 million people. Its administrators have also tried to bring the museum to the world, including with a website in 15 languages and touring exhibits. Through a flagship educational program, the museum helps law enforcement and military officers explore the role of these professions in Nazi Germany. […]

Of relevance during the recently ended shutdown, the museum’s out-of-building educational work is not connected to government appropriations. Those outreach programs are funded by about $40 million in annual private donations, supplementing $50 million in federal appropriations for the museum itself.

In part to expand its donor base, the museum launched a 20th anniversary campaign at the start of 2013. A key goal has been to develop plans for the years ahead, as the survivor population dwindles and the Holocaust recedes into history.

“The museum is set to double its collection during the next ten years,” Bloomfield said. “We’re building a new collection and conservation center, and strengthening our role as a global institution. The private support we get shows survivors that we are here to tell their story.”

Commemorative activities included a four-city tour attended by 1,800 survivors and several hundred World War II veterans, Bloomfield said. Survivors and their relatives were encouraged to donate items to the museum collection, with many participating in workshops and family research sessions.

“The tour was a real passing of the torch moment,” Bloomfield said. “The 20th anniversary comes at a turning point. We know at 25, we won’t have as many of our most powerful teachers – the survivors and eye witnesses. It was one of the most moving experiences of my 27 years here.”

The theme “Never Again: What You Do Matters” has been used throughout the campaign, including a website with 20 actions people can take anywhere to increase Holocaust awareness and prevent genocide.

“The goal is not just to remember the past, but make sure no one will be treated like this again,” Bloomfield said. “If we don’t care as individuals, nothing will happen.”

To shine a light on the role of individual responsibility, the museum opened a new exhibition this year called, “Some Were Neighbors: Collaboration and Complicity in the Holocaust.” Probing the Nazis’ dependence on “ordinary” people to enact their racial policies, the exhibition examines the reasons people did – and not did – assist in the genocide. […]

Very revealing article indeed. Do you see how psychologically manipulative this entire agenda is? The fake “Holocaust” story is totally fraudulent, and virtually all key aspects of this narrative have been debunked by serious, honest scholars and historians. And yet the myth is extremely powerful, perpetuated strictly by psychological warfare, targeting our emotions and exploiting our basic psychology with these traumatizing stories from “eye witnesses” and “survivors” of the “Holocaust”, in addition to the distorted, altered, or otherwise misleading photographs and videos associated with the “Holocaust”.

Once again, I’d like to emphasis the importance of “victims”, “eye witnesses”, and “survivors” in executing and perpetuating psychological and intellectual terrorism, particularly as it relates to the fake “Holocaust” narrative, but also other more modern PSYOPS including 9/11 and the Sandy Hook “shooting”. The “Holocaust survivors” and “eye witnesses” are key aspects of the “Holocaust” PSYOP. The Jews are even going to start using holograms of fake “Holocaust” survivors to indoctrinate and brainwash yet another generation of gullible and susceptible children with their fake narrative of history.

I can hear the next generation of children explaining to their skeptical parents, “But Mom, we know the ‘Holocaust’ was real because we heard all about it from a ‘survivor’ who told us about the horrible things he experienced at the hands of those ‘evil Nazis’! Those Germans sure were mean, brutal fascists, mistreating and genociding the poor, innocent Jews the way they did! We also saw photos of starving, emaciated Jews, and even some dead bodies, which proves the ‘Holocaust’ was real!”

This is the type of propaganda that perpetuates the fake “Holocaust” story – it exploits our base psychology and emotions, and truly is a form of intellectual and psychological terrorism. The promotion or perpetuation of the fake “Holocaust” narrative must be viewed as a crime against humanity.

I know most people in the “truth movement” don’t want to touch this subject, but we have to folks. The Jews have distorted and largely inverted our collective history and understanding of the very reality in which we exist – and they don’t plan on letting up any time soon.

I’ve often said that the lies associated with WWII, Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist Germany, and the fake Jewish “Holocaust” form the historical paradigm in which the vast majority of Americans, and indeed much of the world’s population, collectively view the history of the 20th century. Alternatively, the lies associated with the events of September 11th, 2001 form the modern political paradigm in which the vast majority of Americans, and indeed much of the global population, collectively view the beginning of this young century. The official narratives of both WWII and September 11th, 2001 are demonstrably false on virtually all key aspects. In fact, the official narratives of these events are essentially the exact opposite of reality.

There was no Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII: the National Socialists simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, but had no intentions or plans to “exterminate” or “genocide” the European Jewry. However, the Soviets and her Western allies (the US and UK primarily), who were under the control of international Jewish Communists and plutocrats, certainly did seek the destruction of the German nation (which they themselves openly admitted), and implemented specific policies aimed at accomplishing this goal both during and after the war. Truth be told, the German and other nationalist-minded European peoples who allied with Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist government did in fact experience a very real genocide during and after WWII, not the Jews of Europe.

We were told that the attacks of September 11th, 2001 were committed by radical Muslim fanatics led by Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network. In reality, the Israeli Mossad and Jewish criminals largely controlling the United States federal government and media planed, orchestrated, and executed 9/11, immediately pinning the blame on bin Laden and his alleged network of “Muslim terrorists.” 9/11 was then used to justify the fraudulent “Global War on Terror” and the various tyrannical, un-American domestic policies which have since been enacted.

The official narratives of both WWII and 9/11 are, without doubt, the Big Lies of our time.

The question becomes, why do the vast majority of people still believe and accept the Jewish “Holocaust” narrative of WWII and the official narrative explaining the events of September 11th, 2001? Practically every key aspect of the official “Holocaust” narrative has been debunked and exposed by objective, professional historians. The same is true regarding the official narrative of 9/11, which has been thoroughly debunked and exposed as well. These facts are widely available on the internet, and I myself have written about and posted videos and other information about these subjects on numerous occasions here on this blog. And yet, most people simply cannot or will not accept the facts which contradict the official narrative of WWII generally, and the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” specifically, or the official explanation of 9/11. And the reason is, in my view, effective propaganda and psychological manipulation: we have been psychologically programmed to accept these official narratives, and resist any sort of alternative explanation that does not align with, support, or perpetuate the official narrative. Overcoming the psychological barriers is an extremely difficult task for the vast majority of people when it comes to objectively investigating and analyzing these two events specifically.

Deceitful propagandists have developed effective techniques which are utilized to keep the vast majority of people in a state of trauma-induced, fear-based mind control. The official narrative of both WWII and September 11th, 2001 utilize these techniques.

Lenon Honor has written The 911 Fear-Based Mind Control Program which explains how these mind control techniques work in relation to the events of September 11th, 2001. I interviewed Lenon on The Realist Report and also wrote a review of his book. Today, I’d like to draw upon the research Lenon has developed and apply it to the so-called Jewish “Holocaust” narrative of WWII. I hope to demonstrate to those reading here that the official “Holocaust” narrative of WWII is a form of trauma-induced, fear-based mind control programming on a societal scale. The “Holocaust” narrative is essentially a PSYOP which has been manufactured over the years by deceitful propagandists, alleged “Holocaust survivors”, academia, and the “entertainment” complex, which is in reality a mass mind control complex.

Here are some images that have been shown to millions of people in order to instill and perpetuate this gross distortion of history known as the Jewish “Holocaust”:

What sort of emotions do the above photos elicit in you? Fear, perhaps? Outrage? Sympathy for the “victims”? Desire for revenge, anger, hate towards the “perpetrators” of such “atrocities”?

The traumatic images and videos shown repeatedly to the public, and specifically to individuals identifying as Jewish, induce these sorts of emotions. The extremely emotional sob stories of alleged “Holocaust survivors” and “victims” endlessly promoted by the Jewish mass media, “entertainment” complex, and educational establishment are also quite traumatic, and induce the types of emotions identified above as well.

This is how the trauma-induced, fear-based “Holocaust” mind control program works. The trauma of the official “Holocaust” narrative specifically, and the official narrative of WWII generally, induced into the human mind via distorted or fabricated photographic images, videos, “eye witness” and “survivor” testimony, and other forms of official propaganda produce a form of fear-based mind control similar to what Lenon Honor calls The 911 Fear-Based Mind Control Program.

What if I were to tell you that many of the images shown to the public to promote the Jewish “Holocaust” narrative are fabricated, distorted, and/or taken out of context? For example, the second photo allegedly depicts a barrack full of Jews at the Buchenwald concentration camp. Serious researchers have proven the photo to be a fake. Also, the third photo I posted isn’t even a photo of dead Jews – it’s a photo of the aftermath of the firebombing of Dresden, a German city, by the British and American air forces. This photo has been shown to millions of people with the impression that the dead bodies were in fact Jewish victims of the “Nazi extermination program.”

What if I were to tell you that virtually all of the alleged Jewish “Holocaust survivors” and “eye-witnesses to ‘Nazi atrocities'” were liars, as they have been proven to be time and time again?

And then consider the “trigger words” which trigger the trauma associated with the fake “Holocaust” narrative of WWII. “Death camps” and “gas chambers” and “Nazis” and other words and phrases are constantly used to perpetuate and reinforce the “Holocaust” PSYOP. Even the word “Jew” often draws extreme reactions from many people that I’ve encountered. You can talk all day about Whites, Blacks, British, French, Chinese, etc., but as soon as you say the word “Jew” – watch out!

How can such colossal falsehoods be perpetuated and accepted by the vast majority of people without even the slightest bit of skepticism or critical thinking? The answer is, in a nutshell, propaganda: propaganda that utilizes trauma-induced, fear-based mind control techniques. A Jewish American psychologist even admitted that the Jewish “Holocaust” story was essentially a manufactured hoax which “had penetrated too deep into the subconscious of the masses, so that it could never be dislodged,” as a result of quite effective propaganda techniques. Adolf Hitler, writing in Mein Kampf, perhaps best elucidated the nature of the Big Lie and it’s impact on human psychology. Hitler described the Jews as having “an unqualified capacity for falsehood,” and explained:

… that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.

Only by understanding how we are exploited and manipulated psychologically can we overcome the emotional and traumatic propaganda constantly bombarding our consciousness on a daily basis.

Angelo John Gage was just 17-years-old when he committed to joining the United States Marine Corps shortly after the 9-11 attacks. Now, more than 12 years after serving in the elite military unit and completing two tours in Iraq, he is speaking out in a major way against the “Global War on Terror,” the outrageous racial hypocrisy and double standards on display in the mainstream mass media and political establishment, and a number of other important subjects Americans are rarely exposed to.

Mr. Gage, like countless other patriotic Americans who joined the military in response to the attacks of 9-11, felt he was doing the right thing by joining the Marine Corps, seeking to protect and defend the nation he loves. After investigating many of the inconsistencies and fabrications relating to the official narrative explaining the events of 9-11, and critically analyzing the fraudulent nature of the Global War on Terror, Mr. Gage quickly realized how unjust, immoral, and destructive the wars the American military was – and remains – engaged in truly were.

“Most of us changed our views of the war after we returned home and got to see the lies decimated on television; that there was no weapons of mass destruction and there was no links to the supposed ‘terrorists’ who attacked us,” Mr. Gage explained to this reporter. “Everything I have ever learned was a complete lie.”

After completing his service with the Marine Corps, Mr. Gage began a seven-year journey to find out exactly what he had been lied to about and by whom.

“I came to the realization that Zionists run America, and have instigated and benefited from the Global War on Terror that thousands of Americans have fought and died in, not to mention the millions of innocent Iraqis, Afghans, and other Islamic peoples killed as a result of the wars America has prosecuted.”

Mr. Gage identified a number of problems presently confronting patriotic Americans concerned with the future of their nation, foremost among them “the media and its power to crush opposition with its hypocritical labels,” he stated.

“It is also the school system, banking systems, and just about every single system out there that makes sure it has a tight watch on us, by brainwashing us to police ourselves and make sure everything is ‘kosher’ and in order.”

The role of the Internet and social media in allowing Americans to express themselves and raise awareness of critical issues important to them is often overlooked. Mr. Gage made a number of YouTube videos recently addressing a variety of subjects, one of which has already received almost 10,000 views as of this writing.

“It is the only thing that allows us to still fight; without it, I think we have no chance,” Mr. Gage said, referring to the Internet and social media outlets such as Facebook, YouTube, Blogger, and Twitter. “It is one of the most important weapons we have to fight against this global tyranny because within seconds we can post years of research and videos” for millions of people to view and contemplate.

“We have the most significant and most difficult task ahead of us,” Mr. Gage concluded. “The future is in our hands.”

Read More

One of the most noteworthy characteristics of the organized Jewish community is its outrageous double standards and hypocrisy, particularly as it relates to identity politics. The vast majority of Jews strongly identify as Jews, work in the interests of the organized Jewish community and the Jewish state of Israel, network with other Jews to advance economically, politically, and socially, and concern themselves with the well-being and future prosperity of their people. Jews are Jews, first and foremost – their Jewish identity takes precedence over all other identities. I cannot fault them for that – in fact, it’s quite natural and healthy.

What I do fault them for is their demonization and pathologization of White identity: somehow it’s wrong, “racist”, “supremacist”, and fundamentally illegitimate for White people to care about other White people, to be concerned about the future of White people, etc. This demonization and pathologization of White identity is a uniquely Jewish evolutionary strategy developed over time in order to combat perceived “anti-Semitism” and anti-Jewish attitudes in traditionally White Western Christian nations. Historically, Jews were viewed with suspicion, even hostility, and were often considered outsiders in White Western Christian nations, for wholly legitimate reasons I might add. In order to combat this phenomenon, organized Jewry developed an array of intellectual and political strategies to weaken, subvert, and erode White Western Christian nations – politically, culturally, economically, and racially. A major part of this strategy has been to demonize and pathologize White identity (other strategies include massive non-White immigration, promotion of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” in the West, promotion of homosexuality and other degenerate, perverted sexual practices). Dr. Kevin MacDonald explains this all in great detail in his book Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements.

This double standard in the Jewish community was on full display this week. The Jewish Daily Forward, a prominent, well-known Jewish publication, ran a number of articles demonstrating this hypocrisy which I would like to highlight. In an article entitled, Why Intermarriage Poses Threat to Jewish Life – But Gay Marriage Doesn’t, the writer argues:

A Jewish same-sex family can provide a boon for the Jewish community, while an interfaith couple presents a threat, or at least a challenge.

As technology has enabled same-sex couples to bring children into the world, and as adoption becomes so thoroughly accepted, any Jewish couple with children is a low-hanging fruit for synagogue staff concerned about Jewish vitality, community involvement and membership numbers. If the same-sex marriage debate represents the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community adopting at least some middle-class suburban domestic values, and if American synagogues depend on middle-class suburban families with children for their membership, gay and lesbian couples and American synagogues seem like a match made in heaven.

But that is not the case for an intermarried couple. […]

… the majority of intermarried couples do not raise their children as Jews and, even among those who do, their levels of Jewish identity and practice are lower than in-married couples. If synagogues and Jewish communities want to attract intermarried families, they have an uphill climb that will depend on a huge investment in outreach work. Even with that effort, the odds of an intermarried family’s grandchildren having a strong Jewish identity remain low.

It’s pretty difficult for younger, liberal American Jews to find much moral opposition to either same-sex marriage or intermarriage, but there is every reason to think that American Jewry as a whole — at least non-Orthodox American Jewry — will face a more serious challenge from intermarriage than from same-sex marriage, and might even have much to gain from embracing the latter.

The Jewish Daily Forward also ran an article this week entitled, Jewish Day Schools? Our Future as a People Depends on Them. The second sentence in the article explains everything:

Nothing less than the future of the Jewish people rests on the existence of vibrant Jewish day schools. If we are to have a future as a people — we need day school!

Imagine for a moment a White journalist writing an article entitled Why Intermarriage Poses a Threat to White People or White Day Schools? Our Future as a People Depends on Them. Could you imagine the outrage, the scorn, and the vitriolic attacks that would be leveled against any White person writing or saying this in the mainstream? They’d be called a “racist” and a “White supremacist” and would be told that this type of thinking is outdated, illegitimate, and wrong. “This line of thought is what led to the Holocaust,” we’d be told.

The very same week The Jewish Daily Forward ran the two articles mentioned above, they also ran this article sourced from Reuters. The headline and photo caption says it all:

Obama’s America? A new study sheds a sobering light on the state of social relationship in the U.S.

Do you see the double standards here folks? It’s OK to identity as Jewish (or Black, or Asian, or Hispanic, or homosexual) and be concerned with the future of the Jewish people (or Black people, or Asian people, or Hispanic people, or homosexual people), but it’s wrong to identify as White and be concerned with the future of White people? It’s wrong to stick with your own kind?

As if the anti-Iranian hysteria and ridiculous propaganda leveled against the Islamic Republic couldn’t get any more absurd, we have the following “reports” issued earlier this week. The first comes from Israel National News:

Iran may be preparing to use a heavy water reactor for producing weapons-grade plutonium, according to U.S. and European officials cited in the Wall Street Journal. This is an alternative method for reaching a nuclear bomb, which joins its existing uranium enrichment project.

A heavy-water reactor is an easier target to hit than the underground facilities that house Iran’s uranium-enrichment facilities, the newspaper notes. […]

The second comes from The Times of Israel:

Western intelligence analysts say a new missile launching facility in Iran will likely be used for testing ballistic missiles, not for launching satellites into space as claimed by the Iranians. […]

Does this childish propaganda sound familiar to you? It should – the Jewish media and high level propagandists controlling the United States government used virtually the same exact tactics against Iraq in order to propagandize the world into believing Saddam Hussein posed an “imminent threat” to the West and that he was pursuing “WMDs” that very easily could “fall into the hands of terrorists” and be used against the West.

If you believe this ridiculous propaganda, I’ve got some of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons to sell you, as Mike Rivero likes to say.

Those of you following the mainstream mass media, which we know is totally controlled by Jewish financial and political interests (more on that below), you will have no doubt by now heard that Secretary of State John Kerry is in the process of organizing “peace talks” between the Israelis and Palestinians. Of course, anyone who has even a basic understanding of the history of “Israel” and the manner in which the Jewish state was founded knows full well that “Israel” is not interested in peace with anyone – “Israel” is a terrorist state, a “central organization” for Jewry’s “international world swindle,” and “a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks,” as Adolf Hitler correctly pointed out in Mein Kampf. (See here for more)

The United States, the European Union, and other major international players, including Russia and the United Nations, facilitate “peace talks” between the Israelis and Palestinians from time to time, which essentially amounts to high level diplomats and insiders traveling the world posing for photo shoots and releasing statements to the press. Nothing is ever resolved, no major issues are discussed, no major concessions are made – the entire thing is a dog-and-pony show for the public.

The Israelis have never been and will never be interested in genuine peace talks (and sometimes I wonder whether the Palestinian leadership is either). Two recent news items demonstrate this fact. The first comes from Tablet Magazine and all you need to do is read the headline:

Then we have this headline from The Times of Israel:

Most Israeli Jews would oppose a peace agreement with the Palestinians if it included a full West Bank pullout with land swaps to let Israel retain major settlement population centers, according to a new poll that appears to contradict the conclusions of other recent surveys.

The poll, released Tuesday by the Israel Democracy Institute and Tel Aviv University, found that 63 percent of Jews in Israel oppose a withdrawal to the 1967 lines with land swaps as part of any peace arrangement with the Palestinian Authority, even if it meant Israel would hold onto the Etzion Bloc, directly south of Jerusalem; Ma’aleh Adumim, east of the capital; and Ariel in the central West Bank about 34 kilometers (21 miles) east of Tel Aviv. […]

According to the survey, 50% of Jewish Israelis also oppose the transfer of Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem to Palestinian Authority control with a special arrangement for Jewish holy sites. […]

Seventy-seven percent of Israeli Jews would oppose any agreement that recognized in principle a right of return for Palestinian refugees and their descendants, with a small number being allowed to come and live in Israel, and compensation for the rest.

Sixty-two percent of Israeli Jews and 72% of Israeli Arabs agree that a national referendum is needed to approve any peace settlement that involves evacuating settlements and withdrawal from the West Bank. Notably, 49% of Israeli Jews said that the national referendum should not include the country’s Arab citizens, as opposed to 46% who think all Israelis should have a say. In the Arab sector, the response to the question was 4% and 88%, respectively.

As I stated above, Jewish ownership of the mass media in America is really no secret anymore. It’s quite apparent to anyone paying attention and who is truly interested in discovering this fact. Joel Stein, a Jewish writer formerly with the Los Angeles Times, once bragged about Jewish ownership of Hollywood (and the news media, Wall Street, and United States federal government) in a widely cited article entitled How Jewish is Hollywood? Last summer, The Times of Israel ran a piece written by a Jewish blogger entitled Jews DO control the media.

It doesn’t get clearer than that, does it? If you’re still unsure about the fact Jewish individuals largely own and control the mainstream mass media and entertainment industry in the United States, just click here and have a look for yourself.

The Jewish Daily Forward, in an editorial published a few days ago, again admitted and boasted about the fact Jews own the media, albeit in a round-about, Orwellian manner. The Forward’s editorial revolved around Eugene I. Meyer, the Jewish man who purchased the Washington Post back in 1933. The Post was recently sold to Jeff Bezos, the Jewish founder and CEO of Amazon.com. Let’s take a look at the editorial and see what we learn:

The inappropriate question tweeted late last year by media mogul Rupert Murdoch raised the touchy subject once again. “Why is Jewish owned press so consistently anti-Israel in every crisis?” were his exact words.

The context was the escalating Israeli bombardment of Gaza after a long series of rocket attacks by Hamas, and Murdoch’s scarcely-disguised critique of those in the media who were not, in his view, sufficiently supportive of Israel’s controversial actions. The response to Murdoch’s tweet was so swift and sharp that he apologized “unreservedly” within hours.

As well he should have. The canard that Jews own and control American media is, as Christopher Zara wrote, “a myth that is almost as old as the American media itself.” But, if we are honest, it is a myth with some basis in fact. Many of the great leaders of American journalism were born into Jewish families, and their ascendancy represented a time of unique power and prestige for newspapers and the civic values they championed. The Graham family’s decision to sell the Washington Post marks one more step away from that historical legacy — a legacy that the Jewish community ought to take pride in, rather than renounce or ignore.

Consider: Joseph Pulitzer — “Joey the Jew” was one of his nicknames — was a Hungarian-American Jew who turned the St. Louis Post-Dispatch into a renowned newspaper, published the New York World, endowed the Columbia School of Journalism and was memorialized in the Pulitzer Prizes, bestowed annually to the best in the business.

The Sulzberger family, which still runs and largely controls the New York Times, descends from prominent Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews dating back to America’s Revolutionary War period. Another Jewish family, the Annenbergs, published The Philadelphia Inquirer for decades.

And then there was Eugene Isaac Meyer, who came from a distinguished French Jewish family filled with rabbis and civic leaders that gradually became more assimilated in America, a recurring pattern. […]

Jews, however they are defined, have developed and run some of the most influential journalism enterprises in America, leaving a legacy of creativity, professional commitment, intellectual pursuit and civic leadership. […]

Here we have yet another confirmation from a Jewish source that yes, Jews do indeed largely own and control the mass media in the United States. Considering the mass media is used as a weapon to systematically assault and exploit human psychology, the fact that organized Jewish political and financial interests actually own and control this weapon is an important fact to keep in mind indeed.

Original Article

Shortly after the Constitutional Convention, when it was up to the states to ratify or reject the newly proposed United States Constitution, the Anti-Federalists were already warning the American people that, once approved and established, a consolidated federal government’s “relentless expansion of arbitrary power was unstoppable, its tendency toward corruption was inevitable, and its appetite for despotism was unquenchable,” according to Joseph J. Ellis in his book American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies at the Founding of the Republic (pg. 116). Looking back in hindsight, the Anti-Federalists had it exactly right, at least in the case of the United States.

Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and others skeptical of a centralized federal government were also raising alarm bells at the prospect of a centralized Bank of the United States shortly after the Constitution was approved and ratified by the states. Alexander Hamilton and the elite banking and financial establishment in America, working on behalf of and in collusion with international financial interests centered around the Jewish banking families in London and other major European capitals, “represented a tiny minority within the overall populace” who “had somehow managed to engineer a hostile takeover of the fledgling American republic and were now poised to consolidate their control to the detriment of all the ordinary citizens, mostly farmers, the true lifeblood of the nation,” writes Ellis (pg. 170).

President Andrew Jackson, amongst others, would later warn the American people of the dangers that monopolistic, speculative financial interests posed to the young United States in the early 1800s. In his 1832 veto of the legislation that would have rechartered the Bank of the United States, President Jackson wrote:

The rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes… Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but have besought to make themselves richer by act of Congress.

President Jackson declared to his cabinet “The Bank of the United States is itself a Government,” and warned the American people private corporations sought “power to control the Government and change its character.” He also courageously told his Vice President Martin Van Buren, “The bank is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!” And indeed, President Jackson did just that. However, the international money power seeking to subvert the United States was not defeated.

Time and time again, righteous men in American history raised the alarm bells and sought to prevent the subversion and destruction of the nation their ancestors founded. However, the insatiable desire for political and financial control over these United States was unstoppable, and the forces of international speculative financial capitalism came to dominate this country over the course of the 19th century. The destruction of American economic (and political) sovereignty was finally complete with the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, which centralized the banking and financial apparatus of this nation into the hands of a clique of international plutocrats hell bent on world domination and subjugation. The centralization of a nation’s banking system is a key component of international communism, whose primary goal is the overthrow of Western civilization and all it stands for.

The very concept of a corporation has been transformed and perverted over time. In early American history, states granted private corporations a monopoly on fulfilling a particular public service for a specific period of time. If a road needed to be expanded, for example, and the state was lacking in funds to complete the project, a private corporation would write a charter explaining its purpose (expanding, managing, and maintaining the road expansion) and the state would grant the corporation the privledge of providing an essential public service. Corporations helped build canals, bridges, roads, and other major infrastructure projects, including the extensive railroad system which provided transportation and communication advancements to the American people and private businesses.

But even in this regard, corruption set in, monopolies formed, and the people became oppressed by large financial interests dominating and influencing the state and federal government. Expressing a popular grievance in early America, the editor of New York’s Evening Post William Leggett, wrote:

We cannot pass the bounds of the city without paying tribute to monopoly. Not a road can be opened, not a bridge can be built, not a canal can be dug, but a charter for exclusive privileges must be granted for the purpose… The bargaining and trucking away charted corporation privileges is the whole business of our lawmakers.

The rise of speculative financial capital and large corporations, especially railroad corporations, ushered in an era of unprecedented greed, speculation, corruption, and insider dealings in early American history. Alexis de Tocqueville, the French philosopher and writer who wrote extensively about the unique political and cultural traditions of America, perhaps best expressed the plight of the struggling American frontiersman and farmer. Writing in Democracy in America, Volume Two, de Tocqueville contrasted the “territorial aristocracy” or the traditional elite in European society and the “manufacturing aristocracy” or the financial elite which had arisen in America:

The territorial aristocracy of former ages was either bound by law, or thought itself bound by usage, to come to the relief of its serving-men and to relieve their distresses. But the manufacturing aristocracy of our day first impoverishes and debases the men who serve it and then abandons them to be supported by the charity of the public.

Congressman Hendrick B. Wright of Pennsylvania, a champion of the working class and of the American pioneer, advanced legislation in the late 1870s to help homesteaders – small independent American farmers and ranchers – secure and develop their land without going into massive debt. Congressman Wright’s efforts were defeated by plutocratic financial interests and their minions, who denied the small independent pioneer and farmer – the very men and women who made this country – any sort of financial concessions while they themselves were lavishly awarded government contracts and land grants. Congressman Wright, who once said, “The working men of this land are better entitled to the bounty of Government than aggregated wealth,” responded to the rejection of his legislation with this poignant remark:

Congress can grant railroads money and land, but if it talks of relieving the poor and oppressed, the cry comes, ‘We cannot reward idleness.’

I wonder what Congressman Wright would have said about the criminal bailout of Wall Street in late 2008? Congress can grant Wall Street speculators bailouts as a result of their criminal financial practices, but if it talks of relieving home-owners and oppressed debt-slaves, the cry comes, “We cannot reward idleness.”  Has anything really changed in American politics in the past 150 years?

Indeed, government largess and corrupt dealings created corporate bonanzas, especially for railroad corporations, which was the standard operating procedure in America for much of 19th century and even to this day. Railroad, lumber, cattle, and mining interests were essentially handed large land grants and other special privileges and insider-deals by the federal government, while independent American farmers and homesteaders were largely exploited and forced to fend for themselves. After being elected to his first presidential term in 1884, President Grover Cleveland appointed William Andrew Jackson Sparks as land commissioner. Mr. Sparks’ first report to Congress summarized the situation Americans knew all too well:

The widespread belief of the people in this country that the Land Department has been very largely conducted to the advantage of speculation and monopoly, rather than in the public interest I have found supported by developments in every branch of the service.

As former Governor of Pennsylvania Gifford Pinchot explained, “It must be remembered that monopolistic control was infinitely more potent in the West, in those days, than in the East. The big fellow had control of the little fellow to an infinitely greater extent west of the Father of Waters than east of it.” Speculators, monopolists, and plutocrats were taking over America, and those that stood in their way did not stand a chance.

Henry Adams and Charles Francis Adams, Jr. prophetically wrote in the late 1800s:

The belief is common in America that the day is at hand when corporations far greater than the Erie – swaying power such as has never in the world’s history been trusted in the hands of mere private citizens, controlled by single men like Vanderbilt, or by cominations of men like Fisk and Gould… after having created a system of quite but irresistible corruption – will ultimately succeed in directing government itself.

Congressman James B. Weaver, the populist presidential candidate for first the Greenback Party in 1880, then the People’s Party in 1892, described the ails of the American political system which still plague us today when he wrote in 1892, “Public sentiment is not observed. The wealthy and powerful gain a ready hearing, but the plodding, suffering, unorganized complaining multitude are spurned and derided.”

The 19th century truly was a pivotal period of time in American history.  It was during this century that the government formed by the Founding Fathers morphed from an instrument which served the American people to one which served private economic interests to the detriment of the average American worker, farmer, craftsman, and independent businessman.

Writing in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler succinctly explained exactly where America went wrong during the 19th century:

… as economic interests begin to predominate over the racial and cultural instincts in a people or a State, these economic interests unloose the causes that lead to the subjugation and oppression [of those people or State].

Perhaps unknowingly, Adolf Hitler perfectly described the United States of America during the 19th century – and it’s only gotten worse.

John Friend
July 13, 2013

Alright folks, I’ve got a number of news items from the Jewish press to highlight today.  Some will make you laugh, some will make you cry, but I think we can all gain a deeper insight into the nature and agenda of the organized international Jewish community simply by analyzing their own writings, press releases, and media outlets.

On June 25th, I interviewed Paul Topete of the patriotic rock band Poker Face.  Paul is the main organizer of Freedompalooza, “an annual festival committed to the fight for freedom by exposing the truth by means of music, speakers and vendors dedicated to helping Americans be successful in restoring our Republic.”  The Jewish supremacist criminal organization known as the Anti-Defamation League, along with its partner in crime, the Southern Poverty Law Center, has been whining and crying about Freedompalooza and the “hateful, anti-Semitic conspiracy theories” which proliferate there for weeks now.

Due to pressure from both the Anti-Defamation League and the Souther Poverty Law Center, pseudo American patriots like Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America, Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers, and others cancelled their speaking engagements at Freedompalooza, largely as a result of discovering Paul Topete is capable of critically analyzing history (Paul rejects the absurd Jewish “Holocaust” propaganda and historical narrative of WWII, which the ADL and SPLC brought to the attention of Pratt and Rhodes).  American Free Press appropriately ran a headline in a recent edition of the paper entitled, “ADL, SPLC working to ‘Holocaust’ July 4 Festival” to describe the tactics of the organized Jewish community and their lackeys in their attempts to sabotage Freedompalooza.

On July 2nd, two days before Freedompalooza got started, the ADL released this ridiculous press release:

The American Free Press, an anti-Semitic and conspiracy oriented newspaper pub­lished by longtime white suprema­cist Willis Carto, is the primary sponsor of an upcoming gathering of white supremacists, anti-Semites, anti-government extremists and conspiracy theorists during July 4th weekend, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

“Freedompalooza 2013,” organized by Paul Topete, an extremist lead singer of the band “Pokerface,” will take place from July 4 – 6 in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. The list of invited speakers features several well-known supporters of anti-Semites and racists, including two former members of Congress: Cynthia Mckinney, who has a history of promoting anti-Israel rhetoric, including accusing the pro-Israel lobby of sabotaging her political career, and James Traficant, who since his release from prison on federal racketeering and bribery convictions has joined the Amer­i­can Free Press, where he has expressed his own anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views. […]

How many Orwellian buzzwords (“white supremacist” or “racist” or “anti-Semitic”) did the ADL use in these two paragraphs alone?  And people who consider themselves patriots are intimidated by this sort of childish, inane nonsense?

Shame on Oath Keepers and Gun Owners of America for cowering in the face of pathetic tactics like this from the organized Jewish community.  Cowards and sell outs like Stewart Rhodes and Larry Pratt will never be an asset to the America-first patriot community.  If you want to see how truly weak and pathetic Stewart Rhodes is, read the comment he left on the ADL blog post attacking Paul Topete and Freedompalooza.  Anyone reading this who still supports Oath Keepers and Stewart Rhodes may want to reconsider.

Former Representative Jim Traficant addressed the pathetic and childish attacks coming from the ADL and SPLC during a speech he gave at Freedompalooza this year:

Former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad certainly is not afraid of the organized Jewish community and their childish demonization tactics.  He recently announced that one of the greatest achievements of his presidency was exposing the fake Jewish “Holocaust” story as a fraud on the world stage, as The Times of Israel reported:

Outgoing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said during a farewell ceremony Sunday that publicizing his Holocaust denial was a major achievement of his presidency.

“That was a taboo topic that no one in the West allowed to be heard,” Ahmadinejad said in a speech, according to the Iranian Fars news agency. “We put it forward at the global level. That broke the spine of the Western capitalist regime.”

Ahmadinejad has also openly questioned the official narrative explaining the events of 9/11, which he should be commended for.  I’ve often said that the lies associated with WWII, Adolf Hitler, and the fake Jewish “Holocaust” form our collective historical paradigm, especially in the West, while the lies concerning the events of 9/11 form our collective modern political paradigm. These two Big Jewish Lies must be exposed and rejected, and Ahmadinejad has arguably done more than any other leader on the world stage in recent memory to raise awareness of these issues.  It’s no wonder the man is constantly demonized in the mainstream Jewish-owned mass media.

Speaking of the fake Jewish “Holocaust” story, which has served as a political and psychological weapon employed by the organized Jewish community against the West, as well as a financial racket for “Holocaust survivors” and other Jewish charity and relief organizations, the Jewish Telegraph Agency is reporting that Hungry will resume “reparations” payments to “Holocaust survivors” via the Claims Conference.

About a year ago, the Hungarian government stopped making payments to the Claims Conference because they could not “identify the individuals eligible for compensation.”  There are all sorts of scandals associated with the Claims Conference and other “Holocaust reparations” organizations, including a recent “blistering report” which slammed the Claims Conference and it’s leadership after a $57 million fraud was exposed.  It saddens me seeing Hungry and other European governments cave in to the extortion racket run by criminal organizations like the Claims Conference. When is this Holocaust-insanity going to end?

A friend of mine made the following photo, which I got a kick out of and I’m sure you will, too.

Sex scandals involving the Catholic Church regularly make headline news, and yet stories like this are kept out of the mainstream.  Any guesses why?

Six more people have come forward with accusations against Yeshiva University, days after 19 former high school students filed a $380 million suit charging that Y.U. covered up decades of physical and sexual abuse.

Mike Reck, an attorney representing the six, said his clients are disappointed they have been unable to reach a settlement with Y.U. and are poised to file lawsuits.

If the impasse continues, “the survivors have no choice but to avail themselves of the court system,” said Reck, an attorney with the New York office of Jeff Anderson and Associates, a Minnesota firm that specializes in abuse cases.

As if the American taxpayer wasn’t already giving the criminal terrorist state of Israel enough money, the Jewish Telegraph Agency reports:

The U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Committee allotted $2 million for U.S.-Israel energy cooperation in the fiscal year 2014 Energy and Water Appropriations Bill.

The money in the bill the committee approved Wednesday is the latest such appropriation under the 2007 U.S.-Israel Cooperation Act, which created a grant program to support research and development of renewable energy sources.

To conclude, I’ve highlighted on numerous occasions that the promotion of gay marriage and the homosexual rights agenda is entirely driven by the organized Jewish community, and always has been. The Jewish Daily Forward further documented this fact in a recent report:

A Jewish school teacher from Philadelphia is a face of a new landmark lawsuit that could prompt a Supreme Court ruling guaranteeing same-sex marriage rights nationwide.

Helena Miller, a lesbian whose wife is not recognized as a parent of their baby daughter, is one of more than 20 plaintiffs in a landmark federal lawsuit filed July 9 challenging a law that bans same-sex marriage in Pennsylvania.

The law also bars the state from recognizing such unions performed elsewhere, a provision that directly affects Miller and her family.

“We would really like for our child, when she’s old enough to understand what these things all mean, we want her to understand and see that our family is equal to any other family,” Miller told the Forward.

The new lawsuit, filed jointly by the American Civil Liberties Union and a Philadelphia law firm, is on the cutting edge of an aggressive new legal strategy aimed at pushing the U.S. Supreme Court to guarantee marriage equality across the country.

The homosexual rights movement’s ultimate goal is to destroy traditional Western conceptions of marriage, gender roles, and basic social and familial norms.  And it appears to be working.  As Andrew Anglin recently wrote in a piece for the newly launched Daily Stormer website, “These Jews are not going to stop until you make them stop, folks.”

Indeed, before you know it, the Jews will be saying pedophiles, rapists, and other sexual perverts and predators are “oppressed” and must have “equal rights.”  That is where this agenda is going – it’s time to stand up and say no.

Perhaps no other political figure and period of history is as misunderstood as Adolf Hitler and his rise to power and reign as the Führer of National Socialist Germany.  Confused and oftentimes disingenuous conspiracy historians and alternative media personalities present a wide variety of interpretations of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany, with many claiming Hitler was some sort of secret “Rothschild operative” collaborating with the Jewish international bankers as an agent of Zionist interests in the Middle East, as J. Speer Williams has recently argued.  These alternative “conspiracy industry”-type theories are as absurd and baseless as the mainstream version of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany as the embodiment of evil, hell bent on conquering first Europe, then the world, exterminating all Jews, gypsies, and other scapegoated and “persecuted” groups in the process.

Williams begins his recent essay Hitler was a Zionist Stooge this way:

The International Zionists are led by a dark force with an intelligent mentality, but which is totally bereft of compassion, empathy, or basic wisdom.

But since such an intellect is unfathomable to most human minds, I know of no one who can give us all the reasons for Zionism bringing Adolf Hitler to power and then financing the German Nazi war machine. But the fact that it was done is clearly provable.

The financing of Hitler and his war powers was largely handled by the old Max/Paul Warburg controlled Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam (all Zionists) and the Schroeder Bank of Frankfort, London, and New York (all Zionists).

While Williams makes a good point about the nature of international Zionism as representing a “dark force” that is “totally bereft of compassion, empathy, or basic wisdom”, his sophomoric and simplistic contention, without citing any source material or documentation, that a combination of “Zionist” controlled banks in Amsterdam, London, Frankfort, and New York financed Hitler and “his war powers” (whatever that means) is without merit. Williams attempts to convince his readers that Zionist funding of Hitler and the “Nazi war machine” is “clearly provable”, yet provides no evidence whatsoever for his claims.  He simply declares it so, and expects everyone to blindly follow along. Serious scholars, journalists, and writers provide documentation – using reliable primary and secondary sources – to substantiate their claims.  Obviously, J. Speer Williams is not a serious scholar, journalist, or writer.

Hitler and the NSDAP were not, I repeat, were not funded by Jewish or even pro-Zionist sources. They were not “Rothschild agents” or “puppets of the bankers” or “stooges for the Zionists”. They were diametrically opposed to the Jewish supremacist goal of a “New World Order”, which is essentially Jewish domination and subjugation of the entire globe – politically, economically, and culturally – a Jewish Utopia so to speak. Hitler and the National Socialist political movement not only spoke openly and honestly about important subjects, clearly identifying the enemy of all humanity – international Jewry – they made serious moves against this destructive, parasitic network of criminals that had wrecked their country and sought to destroy their people. National Socialism is the anti-thesis to Jewish Communism and Jewish plutocratic capitalism, two destructive ideologies Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP clearly recognized as Jewish-inspired philosophies which result in the total destruction of every nation they are practiced in.

Indeed, Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist movement represented the greatest obstacle that has ever manifested against the parasitic, subversive, and destructive nature of the international Jewish criminal cabal largely controlling the West, pushing for their “New World Order” on every front imaginable.

As Veronica Clark explains in her must read article titled Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP, Hitler sought to overcome the class antagonism prevalent throughout Germany (and much of Europe) by establishing a political and social order based on merit, rather than class or wealth, and sought to unify German society around their common German heritage and Aryan race.  Funding for the NSDAP came from a variety of sources, including membership fees, speaking engagements, newspaper sales, financial contributions from nationalist-minded small businesses and industrialists, and even elements of the upper classes in German society who recognized the threat of Jewish Marxist communism and wanted to see a revitalized, economically and culturally strong Germany once again.

Theodore Abel’s 1938 book, Why Hitler Came Into Power is perhaps the most important, and yet unknown, book exploring the rise of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party and Adolf Hitler. In early 1934, Abel travelled to Germany after convincing the National Socialist government that had recently come to power that Americans, and the world generally, knew far too little about the National Socialist movement, its ideology, its history and rise to power, and its followers. Abel, working under the auspices of Columbia University, proposed an autobiographical essay contest, in which any member or sympathizer of the NSDAP who had joined prior to the party solidifying its political power over the German state in 1933 could submit an essay explaining his or her background, education, experience, and political affiliations for review.

Abel eventually received 683 manuscripts from a wide variety of National Socialist party members and sympathizers, which he breaks down into age distribution, occupation, class affiliation, and date of joining the NSDAP. Statistical charts and other identifying data are broken down for further analysis as an Appendix. Abel notes that 83 manuscripts were eliminated from consideration, either because they were too short in length and lacking in any detail, or because they were submitted by women, whose entries were used for a separate study published independently of Why Hitler Came Into Power. These manuscripts form the basis for Abel’s work, and numerous excerpts are provided throughout the first two parts of the book from members of the NSDAP themselves, offering readers a unique insight into what motivated and inspired these individuals to join the party and embark on what turned out to be a life long struggle.

In 1986, Why Hitler Came Into Power was re-published with a Foreword written by Thomas Childers, who made some profound observations about Abel’s original and unique research into the NSDAP and the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany. Childers wrote in part:

Abel’s material simply did not fit neatly into the dominate interpretation of National Socialism as a “revolt of the lower middle class.” […]

Abel was struck by the wide variety of motivational factors at work among the respondents, many of which could not be easily subsumed under the interpretive rubric of “lower-middle-class revolt.” […]

These studies have allowed us to identify the social bases of the Nazi following with far greater precision than was ever before possible. Although thematic emphasis and methods differ, these works are in fundamental agreement that support for the NSDAP extended far beyond the lower middle class to elements of the socially established Grossbürgertum (upper middle class) as well as to sizable segments of the blue-collar working class. […]

What attracted members of the upper middle class to the party? Why did many workers turn to the NSDAP? What had drawn them? What role did the NSDAP’s ideological positions play in its popular appeal? How important were Nazi propaganda tactics and organization? These are obviously important questions for any study seeking to explain the sociopolitical dynamics of Nazi success, and it is precisely this set of central issues that Theodore Abel’s work addresses. […]

Abel’s book is comprised of three distinct parts. Part One deals with the history of the NSDAP, with chapters titled The Background of the Hitler Movement, The First Period: 1919 – 1923, The Second Period: 1924 – 1929, and The Third Period: 1930 – 1933, which offer unique insights into the struggles, obstacles, and hardships endured by the NSDAP, and its eventual rise in German politics.

Part Two is analytical in nature, and explains how and why the NSDAP movement gained support. What attracted people to National Socialism? What factors lead to the rise and eventual triumph of the NSDAP in German politics? These and other related questions are addressed in these pages, and help clarify the financing and nature of the National Socialist German Workers Party, as well as its popularity and ability to largely unite all segments of the German nation. Abel breaks Part Two into three chapters: Discontent As a Factor, Ideology As a Factor, and The Why of the Hitler Movement.

Finally, Part Three of the book is comprised of six selected autobiographies of the NSDAP members, published in full. Abel publishes the life stories of a worker, an anti-Semite, a soldier, a middle-class youth, a bank clerk, and a farmer – all chosen “to show, in unified, more realistic form, patterns of National Socialist experience separately analyzed in previous chapters.”  These selected manuscripts demonstrate the widespread appeal of National Socialism, which united German nationalists and patriots from all backgrounds, social classes, and education levels. Farmers, merchants, soldiers, veterans, teachers, industrial workers, bureaucrats, professionals, managers, fathers, mothers, children – National Socialism appealed to and sought to unify all segments of the German populace, and was largely successful in doing so, especially once firmly in control of the German state.

By relying on primary source material – authentic autobiographies of NSDAP members and sympathizers – Abel offers historians and other interested parties a unique analysis of the rise of Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP not found elsewhere.

Just to further discredit this idea that Hitler and the NSDAP were funded by “the Jews”, consider the following excerpt of the legendary Michael Collins Piper’s must read book, The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme – A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious and Economic Origins of the New World Order:

There is also the legend that “The Jewish bankers” or “The Zionist bankers” (used often interchangeably) financed Hitler. Not true. James Pool, in his authoritative work, Who Financed Hitler?, demonstrates quite to the contrary.

In one instance, a Jewish financier in Germany did give money to the Nazi Party–prior to the rise of Adolf Hitler–but those funds were designed to help Hitler’s intra-party opposition to stop Hitler. But despite this fact, some “patriots” still say that “The Jews Backed Hitler.”

Many of those who worship at the altar of this nonsense cite a flagrantly-fraudulent document of shadowy origins entitled Hitler’s Secret Bankers, ostensibly written by one “Sidney Warburg,” one of those “Jewish bankers.” But this document, as we’ve said, is a fraud.

The late Dr. Anthony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler has promoted this theory, based in part on the Warburg travesty and has given further institutionalization to this mythology–truth be damned.

American banks and corporations did work with the Hitler regime, usually a continuation of previous financial arrangements going back decades, but this was not part of any grand conspiracy to bring Hitler to power. The claim that the Bush family was integral to the rise of Hitler is another myth. Kevin Phillips–no admirer of the Bush dynasty–examines the actual circumstances surrounding the Bush-Hitler scenario in his book, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush and puts the facts in proper perspective.

Some even go so far as to claim Hitler was in fact Jewish.  This slanderous conspiracy theory has been debunked by serious researchers and even mainstream, establishment academics, such as the British historian Ian Kershaw who wrote a bestselling biography of Adolf Hitler titled, Hitler: 1889-1936 Hubris.  In the very first chapter Fantasy and Failure, Kershaw thoroughly debunks the false rumor that Hitler himself may have had Jewish ancestry (pg. 7-9):

… [Allegedly] Adolf Hitler’s grandfather was Jewish. Rumours to that effect circulated in Munich cafes in the early 1920s, and were fostered by sensationalist journalism of the foreign press during the 1930s. It was suggested that the name ‘Huttler’ was Jewish, ‘revealed’ that he could be traced to a Jewish family called Hitler in Bucharest, and even claimed that his father had been sired by Baron Rothschild, in whose house in Vienna his grandmother had allegedly spent some time as a servant. But the most serious speculation about Hitler’s supposed Jewish background has occurred since the Second World War, and is directly traceable to the memoirs of the leading Nazi lawyer Governor General of Poland, Hans Frank, dictated in his Nuremberg cell while awaiting hangman.

Frank claimed that he had been called in by Hitler towards the end of 1930 and shown a letter from his nephew William Patrick Hitler (the son of his half-brother Alois, who had been briefly married to an Irish woman) threatening, in connection with the press stories circulating about Hitler’s background, to expose the fact that Hitler had Jewish blood flowing in his veins. […]

Frank’s story gained wide circulation in the 1950s. But it simply does not stand up. […] Hans Frank’s memoirs, dictated at a time when he was waiting for the hangman and plainly undergoing psychological crisis, are full of inaccuracies and have to be used with caution. With regard to the story of Hitler’s alleged Jewish grandfather, they are valueless.

Back to Williams’ piece, Hitler was a Zionist Stooge.  After claiming that international Jewish bankers in London, Amsterdam, Frankfort and New York financed Hitler and “his war powers” without citing a single source or elaborating on the details of this alleged funding, he goes on to claim that the German chemical giant I.G. Farben was under Zionist control, also implying that this industrial conglomerate was working directly with the Hitler government.  Williams mentions that I.G. Farben produced Zyklon B gas used in “Nazi concentration camps” without mentioning that Zyklon B was actually used for health and sanitary reasons, not in some evil plan to systematically murder the Jews and others detained by the German government.  Of course, there are no citations to demonstrate that I.G. Farben was indeed under Zionist control or working with the National Socialist government in any nefarious way.

Williams then makes claims I’ve heard before and read on the internet, almost always without a reliable source to back them up – that the Allies deliberately avoided bombing I.G. Farben industrial facilities located in Germany and German-occupied territories.  From the article:

During the massive fire bombing of almost all of Germany and many of its innocent citizens, the Farben facilities were carefully spared. One used to be able to go onto the Internet and see aerial photographs of the I.G. Farben plants left whole, while everything else around them had been bombed into ruins.

Again, no citation to back up these contentions.  A simple search on Wikipedia for I.G. Farben has this to say:

Facilities during World War II

IG Farben facilities were bombing targets of the Oil Campaign of World War II, and up to 1941, there were 5 Nazi Germany Buna plants that produced Buna N by the Lebedev process.

Dwory

The Buna Chemical Plant at Dwory was under construction by 1943, after a March 2, 1942 contract with “IG Farbenindustrie AG Auschwitz.” The Buna Werke plant, which produced synthetic oil and rubber (from coal), was the beginning of SS activity and camps near Auschwitz III-Monowitz during the Holocaust. At its peak in 1944, this factory made use of 83,000 slave laborers. Today, the plant operates as “Dwory S.A.”

Frankfurt

In addition to the “cavernous” IG Farben building at Frankfurt, a Hoechst AG chemical factory in Frankfurt was bombed by the RAF on September 26, 1944.

Where does Williams, and those who continue to make these claims about I.G. Farben, get their information?  Inquiring minds would like to know.  What sources document that I.G. Farben was controlled by “Zionist bankers” working with Hitler, and that its industrial facilities were spared from Allied firebombing campaigns?

If Hitler and the NSDAP were “Zionist stooges”, why on earth did they do things like this or this or this? Why did they make movies like The Eternal Jew, exposing the enemies of the German race to their fellow kinsmen? Consider Adolf Hitler’s political testament he dictated shortly before he committed suicide in Berlin in April 1945. Does this man sound like a “Zionist stooge” to you?

More than thirty years have passed since 1914 when I made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the First World War, which was forced upon the Reich.

In these three decades love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, actions and my life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions ever to confront mortal man. In these three decades I have spent my strength and my health.

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America. Centuries will go by, but from the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred of those ultimately responsible will always grow anew against the people whom we have to thank for all this: international Jewry and its henchmen. […]

If Hitler was somehow “in cahoots with the Jews”, why did he say things like this all throughout Mein Kampf and in the various speeches he gave?

The Jews have not the ability which is necessary for the founding of a civilization, for in them there is not, and never has been, that spirit of idealism which is an absolutely necessary element in the higher development of mankind. Therefore, the Jewish intellect will never be constructive, but always destructive. (Chapter XI, pg. 209)

Another claim often made by individuals in Williams’ camp is that somehow Adolf Hitler is the “founder of Israel”, which is an absurd and extremely ignorant claim for a variety of reasons.

It was Britain, through the Balfour Declaration, addressed to none other than Lord Rothschild himself, that initially facilitated the establishment of the illegitimate terrorist state of “Israel”, not Germany. Germany never supported or wanted a Jewish state in Palestine. Hitler and NSDAP policy were primarily concerned with getting the Jews out of Germany (and eventually all of Europe), and did in fact collaborate with Zionist organizations and factions that promoted Jewish emigration to Palestine and the West. They even entered into economic agreements with these organizations to not only facilitate the emigration of Jews from Germany, but also bolster Germans exports. Some German Jews ended up moving to Palestine, many more went to London, Paris, New York, and Hollywood, where with their fellow Jews already in the West they would begin their genetically inspired systematic assault on and subversion of Western culture.

Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review lays this out quite clearly in an article titled Zionism and the Third Reich:

[…] German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their” governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state.

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June 1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served as a base for international Communism. Reflecting something of a shift in official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937 for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply increasing.

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world.” “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy, one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.” Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.” In January 1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international increase in power to world Jewry.”

Hitler and the NSDAP did not advocate for or support an independent Jewish state in Palestine. In fact, in Mein Kampf Hitler accurately described what a Jewish state would look like should the Gentile world allow it to happen:

The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.

Bottom line is, the Jews were dead set on establishing their criminal, usurping state in Palestine, not only to fulfill their twisted messianic prophecies, but also to gain a safe haven and central headquarters for their global crime syndicate, a fact Hitler recognized. He wanted the Jews out of Germany in order to rebuild German society after the devastation of WWI, correctly recognizing the subversive and destructive nature innate to the Jewish race. The Jews in Palestine perfected their use of terrorism and underhandedness and declared “independence” shortly after Germany’s defeat in WWII, using their fake “Holocaust” story and agents of influence across the globe to sell their false narrative of history to the rest of the world. And who were the first governments to recognize the illegitimate, terrorist state of “Israel”? Two of the countries most responsible for the genocidal annihilation of Hitler’s Germany, which was resisting the forces of international Jewry, not collaborating with them: the United States and Soviet Union.

On May 14, 1948, the leaders of the Jewish organizations in Palestine, headed by David Ben-Gurion,proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel, to take effect at midnight that night.

At that point, the State of Israel came into existence. The United States recognized the provisional Jewish government as de facto authority of the Jewish state within minutes. The Soviet Union granted de jure recognition almost immediately in 1948 along with seven other states within the next five days (Guatemala, Byelorussia, the Ukraine, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Uruguay, and Yugoslavia). [Source]

Hitler and National Socialist Germany’s ultimate aim was the removal of the Jews from Germany and Europe, and they collaborated with the Zionist movement to accomplish this goal. After the Jews and their puppet Allies brutally destroyed Germany in WWII, which represented the greatest threat in recent history to the global Jewish crime network behind “The New World Order”, it was only a matter of time before “Israel” would be officially established.

Hitler was not “the founder of Israel” and in no way supported the establishment of an independent Jewish state in Palestine as many continue to claim. Hitler and National Socialist Germany were destroyed to pave the way for the establishment of Israel. Blaming Hitler and National Socialist Germany for something the Jews were determined to do on their own – with the assistance of their puppets in the West – is a gross distortion of history.

To conclude his ridiculous and unscholarly essay Hitler was a Zionist Stooge, J. Speer Williams claims that there are “deeper reasons” underlying why the Zionists brought Hitler to power, and that ultimately the end goal of the Zionist conspiracy is to “mutate and ultimately exterminate” the Semitic gene, which according to Williams included both Jews and Arabs.  In the very next sentence, however, Williams admits that he can’t even prove his point:

But, again, I cannot prove any of that, except for the fact of depleting uranium being used in the Zionist Middle Eastern wars of US/Israeli aggression.

The only thing that can be demonstrably proven is that J. Speer Williams simply does not know what he is talking about, and is perpetuating myths and slanders about Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany, albeit of a different nature than the lies endlessly promoted by the mainstream mass media and educational establishment.  J. Speer Williams and other disingenuous and ignorant individuals confusing the public with ridiculous and baseless theories that “Hitler was a Zionist stooge” are essentially doing the bidding of the Jews who have demonized and distorted the actions, legacy, and worldview of Adolf Hitler and National Socialism for so long.  Please do not take these people seriously.