I thought the wokie John Bolton was big time on CNN, but instead he’s on a Rumble show it took me some minutes to even locate.

Woke has really gone broke if Bolton can only appear with some Indian leftist no one has ever heard of.

RT:

US President Donald Trump does not want the Ukraine conflict complicating his agenda and may well end up offering Vladimir Putin a peace deal that would make the Russian leader “very happy,” former US national security adviser John Bolton has claimed in an interview with Afshin Rattansi’s show ‘Going Underground’.

Bolton worked for Trump during his first term, but ended up being fired in September 2019 after only 18 months on the job. The US president later described the Republican as a “nutjob” and called his appointment one of his “biggest mistakes.” One of the first things Trump did after his inauguration on Monday was terminate his former adviser’s security detail provided due to alleged threats from Iran.

The new administration in the White House is “bad news” for Kiev, Bolton told Rattansi on Saturday, pointing out that Trump recently “threatened Ukraine with a cutoff of military assistance” if it refuses to talk peace with Russia.

The US president and his team “want a negotiation because as with everything with Trump the world is just a long line of deals. He wants a deal to take this word ‘Ukraine’ off his table. He views it as [former US President Joe] Biden’s war… He wants it over with. He does not want it complicating his agenda,” he said.

Well, that would certainly seem reasonable enough.

If you’re a patriot.

For a wokester, nothing is reasonable.

The possible terms for settling the Ukraine conflict voiced by Vice President J.D. Vance during the campaign look like “a peace plan that could be written in the Kremlin,” the former national security adviser argued.

“I think Putin and the Kremlin would be very happy with the deal where they keep the territory in Ukraine; there is a ceasefire; NATO does not accept Ukraine as a member,” he said.

According to Bolton, Putin “sees Trump as an easy mark, somebody who is susceptible to flattery” and will try to take advantage of the US president’s conviction that “US relations with foreign countries depend on his personal relationship with the head of state.”

Who cares, dickhead?

None of that has shit to do with anything!

These wokesters are so wacky you might as well call them “wacksters.”

Bolton himself went woke because he hates patriots and has the woke mind virus. He wants everyone to be gay and flooded with niggers. He wants to kill all the whites for DEI.

If he wasn’t so woke he would see that woke is a mind virus, and no one likes niggers or gays.

Maybe I should send Bolton a copy of my new shirt.

You can get your own copy of that shirt at http://www.killallniggers.com/merch or pick up one at your local Barnes and Noble.

China is the sole reason people do not like the Biden government.

I’m not sure how China pulled this off, but I salute them for it.

New York Post:

China is engaged in an “asymmetric warfare” campaign in the United States aimed at influencing public opinion and weakening Americans’ faith in their institutions, former National Security Advisor John Bolton said.

“Chinese influence operations in this country, and efforts really to fragment us politically, are definitely underestimated. I think we’re still learning a lot about it,” Bolton told host John Catsimatidis Sunday on WABC 770 AM’s “Cats Roundtable” show.

“Some of them, like the Confucius Institutes at universities, are just propaganda centers. That’s becoming more evident. We’ve got to wake up to this threat. We have not been willing to see it,” said Bolton, 74.

The US government and citizens are more aware of China’s efforts to undermine America economically through the stealing of economic property and bullying allies including Taiwan, he explained.

“But this attempt to influence our public opinion without letting anybody know they’re doing it, that’s much more insidious, and, in the long term, more dangerous,” said Bolton, who served as the White House national security adviser under former President Donald Trump.

It’s so secretive that there is not even any evidence that it’s happening. There isn’t even a vague explanation as to how the mechanism works.

But we know it’s real because John Bolton is very reliable and serious.

He’s probably like, one of the top 3 most serious people of all.

BRICS expansion doesn’t constitute a ‘serious challenge,’ said former U.S. national security advisor John Bolton pic.twitter.com/rfqm4GLIiB

— CNBC International (@CNBCi) August 25, 2023

It was obvious that the Ukraine was going to get totally wiped out in their “offensive.” I mean, people had to have known that. I knew it. How could career military strategists not know it?

The plan was probably always to let it fail and then say “oh well, see – this is proof we need NATO.”

RT:

Failures in Ukraine’s much-touted counteroffensive against Russia stem from the West’s inability to provide Kiev with the necessary military equipment within a reasonable timeframe, former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has said.

In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal published on Sunday, Bolton lamented that Kiev’s long-anticipated push, which started in early June, “isn’t making the headway some proponents had forecast,” adding that the disappointing results must become a “wake-up” call for Washington.

The former White House official – widely regarded as a foreign-policy hawk and who has advocated regime changes in Iran, Syria, Libya, and Cuba – insisted in his article that Kiev’s “inability to achieve major advances is the natural result of a US strategy aimed only at staving off Russian conquest,” while he also urged US President Joe Biden to start “vigorously working toward Ukrainian victory.”

“Ukraine’s offensive failures and Russia’s defensive successes share a common cause: the slow, faltering, non-strategic supply of military assistance by the West,” Bolton claimed, adding that the US-led support for Kiev has been hampered further by speculation that Moscow might escalate the conflict.

Bolton, who served in the Trump administration up to 2019, sought to allay those concerns, insisting that “there’s no evidence” that Russia has conventional military capability to threaten NATO or a desire to launch a nuclear strike. Moscow has repeatedly stated that it adheres to the policy that nuclear war should never be fought, and that it might resort to its atomic arsenal only if the very existence of the state is threatened.

The former national security adviser also dismissed the need for talks between Kiev and Moscow, arguing that these would only benefit Russia. Instead, he suggested that the West and Washington should radically tighten their sanctions regime.

In addition, he called on Washington to slap restrictions directly on China, citing its “enormous support” for Moscow. While Beijing remains Russia’s key trade partner, it has repeatedly denied that it was providing Moscow with military support.

Ukrainian forces initiated a large-scale offensive against Russian lines over two months ago, after being reinforced by hundreds of Western-supplied tanks and armored vehicles. However, according to the Russian Defense Ministry, Kiev has so far failed to gain any significant ground and has lost more than 43,000 service members since the start of the push.

The longer this goes on, the more vague the reasons for it become. There are positives and negatives to that for the media.

War weariness is a thing, but it can either take the form of “just give up and be done with it” or “just finish them off.”

If played right, war weariness could lead to support for NATO intervention.

Anyway – John Bolton is a meme. There is no leader in history who was more committed to endless, pointless war than Joe Biden. Saying he is not hardcore enough is like me praising OJ Simpson.

The evidence is that the Jake Sullivan plan is to get through the election and then send in the troops.

Apparently, John Bolton is the most principled man in Washington.

I’m not even being sarcastic.

There is zero reason he would be concerned about the US being held to its own standards. Among other things, the Kosovo precedent would make the Ukraine war impossible if the US was held to its own standards. Also, the US would have to tolerate the Russian invasion based on the Iraq precedent.

The US is never held to its own standards, so there is zero reason not to support the Hague coming after Putin.

RT:

Former US national security advisor John Bolton has come out against the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to indict Russian President Vladimir Putin, calling the court “fundamentally illegitimate.”

“I believe and have for many years [that] the International Criminal Court is fundamentally illegitimate,” Bolton told Sky News on Monday, adding that its arrest warrant for Putin is “not something that the United States should cooperate with.”

“It’s a very dangerous institution,” he continued. “It is an exercise of governmental power in a vacuum without any constitutional framework to restrain it.”

The Court’s pre-trial Chamber issued a warrant on Friday for the arrest of Putin and Russian Children’s Rights Commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova for the “unlawful deportation” of children from “occupied areas of Ukraine.” The charges refer to Russia’s efforts to evacuate civilians away from areas – mostly in the predominantly Russian-speaking region of Donbass – shelled by the Ukrainian military.

It’s such a bizarre way to get the headline (which is obviously what this was all about).

I mean, what is Russia supposed to do with war orphans? Just leave them to die?

I saw on CNN, some reporter had talked to someone who got their kid back from Russia, and he was whining that they had to go through a complex process (which I just assume involved DNA tests). The implication was that it should be easy for people to just request children without evidence they are the parents.

Neither the US nor Russia recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction. Speaking to reporters on Friday, US President Joe Biden said that he believed the arrest warrant was “justified,” but admitted that the court was “not recognized by us either.”

In addition to sanctioning a number of top International Criminal Court officials in 2020, the US maintains the ‘Hague Invasion Act’, giving its military permission to invade the Netherlands were any US citizens detained at the court.

As George W. Bush’s undersecretary of state, Bolton signed the official letter withdrawing the US from its jurisdiction in 2002. As Donald Trump’s national security advisor, he threatened sanctions against anyone cooperating with its investigations into alleged US war crimes in Afghanistan.

lol

While Bolton has maintained for two decades that the ICC is a “direct assault on the concept of national sovereignty,” he argued on Monday that its indictment of Putin could hinder eventual peace talks in Ukraine.

“If you want negotiations to take place, do you think an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin makes it more likely or less likely he will negotiate?” he asked Sky’s Kay Burley. Instead, he suggested that either Ukraine or a hypothetical pro-Western government in Moscow should try the Russian president.

Wait – there’s going to be a pro-Western government in Moscow…?

What does that…

Never mind. Whatever.

I agree with Bolton here completely, by the way, on the matter of the court. So do Russia and China. An international court is a retarded idea. Basically, if there was such a thing as an “international war criminal,” every state that agreed with the charges could issue their own arrest warrants for him and then deport him to the place he committed the alleged crimes. That solves the issue.

What the existence of the ICC implies is that the court could send troops to violate a country’s national sovereignty and arrest someone and then fly him out of the country. This is what Israel did to Nazi “war criminals” in South America, but Israel acknowledges that this was illegal. Normalizing this sort of thing is a terrible idea, and doesn’t benefit anyone in the world, other than whoever is in charge of the Hague.

It’s also notable here that Bolton is talking about negotiations. The Biden government has insisted that there will never be negotiations ever, and they would rather see everyone in the Ukraine dead than negotiate. This would obviously be the normal position of Bolton as well, so the fact that he is talking about negotiations implies, once again, that war hawks in Washington want to wind this thing down so they can focus on China.

Meanwhile, China is clearly trying to force them to do what they said they were going to do. Xi is in Moscow presenting his peace plan, so if the US backs down now, they will be submitting to China. Therefore, they are likely going to feel like they are locked into the war, which then gives China the ability to help Russia.

At this point, I really feel like a serious defeat of the US would be a better outcome than the US fleeing the scene while blaming Marjorie Taylor Greene. China should commit troops, and the Russia/China alliance should take Kiev and occupy it. That is the best outcome. The US started this war – make them deal with the consequences.

John Bolton is basically a troll, pushing the Overton Window, creating new forms of acceptable speech.

I mean, he would probably do all this stuff if had power, but I don’t think he expects the government to start openly bombing Russian infrastructure.

He’s going to have to settle for the US bombing Russian infrastructure and then blaming a pro-Ukrainian group called “Pro-Ukrainian Group.”

RT:

Russian intimidation has prevented NATO members from giving Ukraine the weapons it needs and allowing it attack any targets it wants – including key European infrastructure – US arch-hawk John Bolton has claimed. This must change, he has insisted, in an oped urging President Joe Biden to change his policies.

“[Russian President] Vladimir Putin has masterfully deterred NATO from responding robustly enough to end the conflict promptly and victoriously. Time to solve this problem is growing short,” Bolton wrote in an opinion piece published by the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday.

The former national security adviser to President Donald Trump blamed Biden for failing to aim for “ambiguous goals” and claimed his “fear of Russian escalation” had led to a military gridlock in Ukraine. The current president “barely tried” to prevent the Russian military operation, Bolton argued, before criticizing the reported limitations imposed by Washington in terms of which targets Kiev can attack with the weapons it gets from the West.

“NATO pressures Ukraine not to strike inside Russia, and to spare key assets like Nord Stream, whereas the Kremlin can strike anywhere within Ukraine,” he wrote.

It’s funny because the US didn’t spare Nord Stream.

Nord Stream comprises two undersea gas pipelines, which were built to deliver Russian natural gas directly to Germany. They were blown up in September.

Bolton mentioned claims in the Western press, which said US intelligence suspected that a “pro-Ukrainian group” not connected with any government had carried out the sophisticated operation. Even if Kiev ordered the attack, he said, it should not impact the level of support it gets.

According to Bolton, debates in NATO on whether to deliver longer-range ATACMS missiles or F-16 fighter jets to Kiev “reflect a disjointed strategy” and harm Ukraine’s war effort. He said it was clear to him that “fears of Russian escalation are unwarranted.”

It’s not actually disjointed, and he understands that. The strategy is to slowly make the war more acceptable in the minds of the public – particularly in Europe, because they are more concerned about things. Americans honestly don’t even care about anything, and most of them wouldn’t know what has been sent to the Ukraine so far.

Of course, the other element here is that there appears to be a winding down of the war so these people can focus their guns on China. The sending of the tanks turned out to be basically much ado about nothing – it was a very small number of tanks and most of them haven’t even been sent yet. Not really a game-changer.

It seems unlikely they are going to escalate to jets. There is no objective in the country anymore, now that it is clear Russia is not going to collapse, and given the drive for a war with China, precious resources and morale are being burned for nothing.

At an event about current National Security threats—

I asked @AmbJohnBolton why he lied about WMD’s in Iraq, covered up war crimes in Afghanistan, and celebrated when Julian Assange was arrested.

I was immediately detained and removed from the event. pic.twitter.com/zctfbORghW

— Tayler Hansen (@TaylerUSA) November 10, 2022

The people who run our country have zero respect for our traditional, established norms and institutions. They view America as a machine to accomplish their weird goals of global anal supremacy – not a place that is a lot of people’s home, where we have beliefs and values that we hold dear.

They think our identity as Americans is a joke.

RT:

Former US national security advisor John Bolton joked about the First Amendment as a protesting journalist was detained for accusing him of lying about weapons of mass destruction and “covering up war crimes in Afghanistan.”

Bolton’s speech at an Institute for Policy Innovation conference in Texas on Thursday was interrupted by journalist Tayler Hansen, who stood up and accused the long-time war-hawk of lying about Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction prior to the 2003 US invasion.

“You essentially genocided the Iraqi people,” Hansen shouted at Bolton. “And you covered up war crimes in Afghanistan, sir.”

“Why did you celebrate the arrest of Julian Assange?” Hansen continued. “Why do you think that’s acceptable, sir? Is celebrating war crimes acceptable?”

Hansen was detained by security and removed from the conference. As he was led away, Bolton drew applause from the crowd when he remarked “that’s another example of the First Amendment at work,” referring to the US Constitution’s guarantee of free speech.

Bolton served in numerous positions in the Reagan, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr. administrations, before a stint as Donald Trump’s national security adviser in 2018 and 2019. He was sacked by Trump after advocating regime change in Iran and apparently scuppering peace talks with North Korea, with the then-president claiming that “we would be in World War Six by now” if he listened to Bolton’s advice.

That line alone is funnier than every single joke Rodent in Ass has made in his entire life.

Of course, Trump did hire this guy. He hired a lot of bad people because he was being pressured by that Jew rat Jared Kushner.

It’s good to see these regime leaders being harassed in public again. AOC has recently been harassed several times about her support for a nuclear war with Russia.

We need America First. We need people in our government who believe the things that normal people believe, and have the goals that the people have. Being led by people who mock everything we hold dear is an interesting experiment, but we’ve spent decades trying it out, and the results are not good at all.

The US government is constantly threatening to kill people. Then they go around and say anyone who questions them is evil. They claim to have created a new morality in the last 6 or 7 years that is a universal morality that everyone has to accept, and if you don’t accept it, they’ll kill you. Then they act very shocked when people are like “nigga, what?”

All the Saudis did was kill some faggot terrorist journalist, and the Jew media acted like it was the super-outrageous thing. But the US will just casually threaten to kill world leaders.

New York Post:

Former national security adviser John Bolton suggested Tuesday that the US could assassinate Russian President Vladimir Putin if he unleashed nuclear hell on Ukraine.

​”We need to make clear [that] if Putin were to order the use of a tactical nuclear weapon he would be signing a suicide note,” Bolton​ told the British radio station LBC on Tuesday. “I think that’s what it may take to deter him if he gets into extreme circumstances.”

Bolton was asked by host Andrew Marr whether he meant assassination by the “suicide note” remark.

“We cannot allow the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine or anywhere else from terrorists like Iran, or North Korea, as well as from Russia or China, without the person who was responsible for that decision being held accountable,” Bolton responded, before adding that he believes the US has the ability to target the Russian leader.

“And I think he knows that. You can ask Qassem Soleimani in Iran what happens when we just decide somebody is a threat to the United States,” Bolton went on, referring to the US killing one of Tehran’s top generals in a January 2020 drone stroke.

Bolton, who also served as US ambassador to the United Nations during the George W. Bush administration, said action targeting Putin “might not happen the next day” after the bombs drop.

However, he said that Washington must “make it clear to Putin that this is not a free decision on his part. We know who would be responsible for the use of nuclear weapons. We know it would be him and he will be held accountable.”

Putin is not going to nuke the Ukraine. That is just goofy nonsense. Why would he do that when he can just use regular missiles, like we saw him doing this week?

When Putin talks about nukes, he’s talking about nuking America and Europe. These people know that, they just don’t want to tell the stupid goyim and get them all rattled. Every media/government Jew has a sign in their office that says “don’t rattle the goyim.” Pretending like Putin is talking about nuking the Ukraine, and then talking about that, makes the goyim think it’s serious without knowing how serious it actually is.

Also, for the record, the US can’t just assassinate Vladimir Putin.

What are they even talking about? Lindsey Graham and Sean Hannity were saying this months ago. Are they going to send a ninja? What does it even mean?

But hey – it’s good to see Fredo back in action.

He’s a real trooper.

Stunning statement from former National Security Advisor John Bolton on CNN just now:

"As someone who has helped plan coup d'état — not here but, you know, other places — it takes a lot of work." pic.twitter.com/3rsSX355ND

— The Recount (@therecount) July 12, 2022

John Bolton was trying I guess to defend Donald Trump on CNN, and he said that he knows it’s hard to plan a coup d’tat, because he’s planned them in other countries.

He says 1/6 couldn’t have been a coup, because Trump would have had to have spent more time planning it.

It’s kind of a weird clip. We know the countries he’s talking about – at least some of them. But the US government has never admitted to this before.

I guess he gets off on just saying that.

And he’s supposed to be the good guy defending Trump because although he Trump sent people to riot, he didn’t actually try to do a coup?

He’s getting on well with Jake Tapper, who is Jewish. Bolton claims he is only 1/8th Jew, which is something weird to really even talk about, and shouldn’t affect a person’s behavior. I suspect he is more Jewish than we are aware.

If I didn’t know better, I would think that John Bolton was a Chinese/Russian/Iranian shill attempting to bully the US Empire into stretching itself so thin that it collapses.

RT:

Taiwan should ramp up its military cooperation with the US and start hosting American troops on its soil as it did before the 1979 switch of diplomatic recognition to Beijing, former US National Security Advisor John Bolton proposed at a policy event on Saturday.

Both the Washington and Taipei should boost military spending on the island’s defense, Bolton insisted, adding that the formal stationing of American troops could be part of a solution to the threat from China.

The US maintained a military presence on Taiwan between 1950 and 1979, with as many as 19,000 troops deployed during the period. This changed with the Nixon-era rapprochement with Beijing, which culminated in Washington’s change of diplomatic recognition of China to the mainland under Jimmy Carter.

However, the US kept informal diplomatic, trade and military relations with Taipei, including by keeping some military personnel as trainers and advisors, as well as guards at the American Institute in Taiwan, the de facto US embassy. The presence of US military personnel in Taiwan had long been an open secret, although last October Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen made an escalatory move by openly acknowledging their presence on the self-governed island.

It’s kind of obvious that after the Ukraine operation ends, the Taiwan operation will begin.

Taiwanese people won’t actually fight, however, so you would need American military heavily involved on the island. They would need to do what they are doing in the Ukraine – stage fake atrocities to blame the Chinese.

Bolton has also been out there whining about how Trump didn’t send enough weapons to the Zelensky terrorist occupation government of the Ukraine.

.@AmbJohnBolton tells @MarquardtA "the overall deterrence posture of Ukraine and the west against Russia would have been stronger" if Trump had been helping Zelensky during his presidency, instead of withholding aid and trying to use Ukraine to serve his political ambitions. pic.twitter.com/iRjFMssc0d

— Ali Main (@alisonkmain) April 16, 2022

CCP Foreign Affairs Chief Yang Jiechi to U.S. Sec. of State Antony Blinken:

"The United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength"'pic.twitter.com/wr2dklfRMQ

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) March 19, 2021

Jewish Secretary of State Antony Blinken brought a bitch with blue hair to his meeting with Chinese officials. Just in case the Chinese weren’t totally clear that this was a clown show.

Blinken presented veiled threats masked in gibberish.

China’s statements in response were BASED.

New York Post:

President Biden on Friday said he’s “proud” of Secretary of State Tony Blinken after the top diplomat sat through an anti-American tirade from Chinese officials at a summit in Alaska.

“I’m very proud of the secretary of state,” Biden told reporters on the White House lawn after the unexpected lashing Thursday from Communist diplomats who mocked Biden’s claim to be operating from a “position of strength” to Blinken’s face on US soil.

The shocking attack on the United States from China contrasted with familiar US criticism of China, including on human rights in Hong Kong and Xinjiang.

Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi lectured Blinken and White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan on what he said was US hypocrisy.

“The United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength,” Yang said through a translator at the summit in Anchorage.

“Many people within the United States actually have little confidence in the democracy of the United States,” said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

For the first time, ever, China has demonstrated that it is aware of domestic developments in America.

They are truly evolving.

“We believe that it is important for the United States to change its own image and to stop advancing its own democracy in the rest of the world.”

Sullivan twice attempted to promote what he called the “secret sauce” of US democracy, including an ability to “look hard at its own shortcomings.”

“The other secret sauce of America is that our people are a problem-solving people, and we believe we solve problems best when we work together with allies and partners around the world,” Sullivan said.

The Chinese Communist Party team bluntly rebuffed US criticism for their elimination last year of Hong Kong’s political autonomy and alleged abuse of Uighur Muslims.

Yang said, “The US has American-style democracy and China has Chinese-style democracy. It is not just up to the US, but also the world to evaluate how the US has done in advancing its own democracy.”

Yang chided what he described as US hypocrisy on human rights as well as cybersecurity in an apparent nod to the Trump administration campaign against Chinese telecom firm Huawei over security concerns.

Yang accused the US of being a “champion” of cyberattacks and invoked the Black Lives Matter movement.

“We hope that the United States will do better on human rights. China has made steady progress in human rights. And the fact is that there are many problems within the United States regarding human rights, which is admitted by the US itself,” Yang said.

“The United States has also said that countries can’t rely on force in today’s world to resolve the challenges we face. And it is a failure to use various means to topple the so-called ‘authoritarian’ states. And the challenges facing the United States in human rights are deep-seated. They did not just emerge over the past four years, such as Black Lives Matter. It did not come up only recently.”

The drubbing for Biden’s team, which appeared unprepared to counter the hostility, followed an introductory phone call last month between Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

It was intended to be a pointless meeting, a show for the American people, to make it look like they are attempting to be rational.

The Chinese obviously took advantage of the situation to use it for their own domestic purposes.

But here’s the thing: Antony Blinken is claiming that he wants sovereignty over Taiwan AND Hong Kong, and that he wants to be able to dictate domestic policies INSIDE of mainland China. That is his starting point of demands, which he is claiming cannot be negotiated.

This is the same exact thing that Mike Pompeo did.

The fact is: the globalists cannot tolerate the fact that China is not on the same system as the West (and now most of the third world), and they are saying “we are going to force this on you no matter what.”

China is saying “come at me, bro.”

If you want to just understand this in short: John Bolton is supporting the Biden Administration.

You can watch this full video. It is actually nuts.

China is saying “back up, back up!”