The right-wing will not only promote extreme Marxist-feminist ideas of “consent” when they think maybe it might benefit them, but they will also promote the dumbest leftist dumbshit about how it’s sexist hatred to get into an argument with a woman if they think that will benefit them.

Fox News:

CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta was widely blasted for interrupting Dr. Deborah Birx during Friday’s coronavirus briefing to attack President Trump.

Birx took a moment at the podium to address the “who knew what when” concerns and said all the countries affected by the pandemic can “look back” to develop a timeline but not while “in the middle” of the crisis.

“We can talk about why didn’t Italy do something or Spain do something or Germany do something, or we can really say right now — we all can do something,” Dr. Birx explained. “We can do the social distancing and all of the pieces that we know is starting to work around the globe in country after country. And then when we get through all of this, we can ask the questions about could we have done some piece of this better as a global community.”

She then pivoted to the apparent errors the World Health Organization (WHO) made leading up to the outbreak in the U.S. as something that should be examined.

“I will remind you that on February 3rd, the head of the WHO said there was no reason to ever do a travel ban,” Dr. Birx continued. “It wasn’t until January 14th that we knew that there was human-to-human transmission,”

Acosta quickly derailed her observations about WHO to knock President Trump.

“Dr. Birx, the president was saying this was going to go away,” Acosta said. “It’s April.”

“It is going to go away,” President Trump fired back. “I said it was going away and it is going away.”

…

Some accused Acosta of attempting to “mansplain” to the female medical expert.

“‘Dear Diary: While I’m no expert, I tried #Mansplaining to an expert medical expert named Dr. Birx. @Acosta,'” former CNN commentator Paris Dennard quipped.

“@Acosta just tried to mansplain to Dr. Birx,” GOP national spokeswoman Elizabeth Harrington tweeted.

Of course it’s now a black man and a white woman who are the front of the GOP assault to own the libs by accusing them of fake things.

Dear Diary:
While I’m no expert, I tried #Mansplaining to an expert medical expert named Dr. Birx.” @Acosta https://t.co/fLuOLOF7LZ

— PARIS (@PARISDENNARD) April 3, 2020

.@Acosta just tried to mansplain to Dr. Birx

— Elizabeth Harrington (@LizRNC) April 3, 2020

This is completely bizarre and stupid. The only people who benefit from this nonsense are women, collectively. And when women collectively benefit from anything, the right-wing loses, as women collectively support a communistic and anti-white agenda.

You also demoralize your own people. The average right-winger is not out there like “yall know what, them liberals is sayin we mansplainin them, but they is out there mansplainin us!”

This is not something that anyone wanted to happen. There is no audience for this. Conservatives are simply stupid.

But ah, it all seems so petty to even talk about now, doesn’t it?

These people think their little game is so important, but soon comes a time when there will only be one thing that is important: survival.

The average “journalist” working for the mainstream Jewish media is nothing more than a malicious troll promoting lies and hoaxes.

We are now at a point in time where the most honest and truthful sources of news and analysis comes from a combination of trolls, satirists and comedians on the Internet. Mainstream journalism, which is largely run by Jews, has become one of the most grotesque jokes imaginable. They maliciously troll their audiences with absurd and ridiculous lies. Anonymous people posting comments on the Internet have even become a more trustworthy source of information than these frauds.

Trolls, satirists and comedians use humor to reveal important truths. This is in stark contrast to “journalists,” who present themselves as serious figures but consistently push lies while engaging in highly unethical behavior.

Let’s for a moment review some of the big lies they’ve pushed along with specific examples showing their extreme lack of ethics.

Climate change hoax

These “journalists” for years have promoted the enormous lie that man-made carbon emissions are causing changes in the climate which will result in an environmental doomsday apocalypse. This hoax was recently debunked by a Finnish study, and countless environmental doomsday predictions promoted by these people have never come to pass. Yet despite that, they continue trolling their audiences with this overtly retarded narrative while pushing increasingly more insane doomsday predictions.

Russiagate hoax

For the past two years, the American people were subjected to an endless number of lies from these “journalists” who claimed that Donald Trump was a Russian agent working for Vladimir Putin. Michael Isikoff, a Jewish writer for Yahoo! News and who was a major figure promoting this hoax, did not lose his job. Instead, he was later allowed to write a so-called “exclusive” article claiming that theories about Seth Rich’s murder were part of a Russian conspiracy. As if Isikoff had any standing or credibility to make such claims. Yahoo! News was effectively trolling their audience by publishing such an article by this discredited Jew “journalist.”

Jewish Holocaust hoax

Despite there being no real evidence that six million Jews were gassed in fake shower rooms by Adolf Hitler during World War II, these “journalists” continue to promote this stupid hoax. They do this because they mostly work for organizations run by Jews who benefit off of extorting non-Jews with this insane lie. It is a troll of outlandish proportions.

Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction hoax

The Jewish “journalist” Judith Miller was at the forefront of promoting a lie claiming that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, which was used to justify an American military invasion of Iraq. Instead of being blacklisted from the industry for promoting this lie, Fox News recently allowed her to write an op-ed on their website shilling for a war against Venezuela. She’s literally the last person you would ask to dissect such matters. So just by publishing her article, Fox News was trolling their audience and mocking their intelligence.

Syria chemical weapons hoax

Using random video footage of children being sprayed with water hoses, these “journalists” concluded that this was proof that Syria’s leader Bashar al-Assad was gassing his own people with chemical weapons. Any person with basic common sense could understand that such a video alone was not proof that Assad gassed his own people. But that did not stop these “journalists” from trolling their audience with this insanity. These claims were later debunked and it was revealed that the entire video was staged propaganda.

Falsely claiming that right-wing groups and personalities aren’t being censored on the big social media sites

These “journalists” have been consistently claiming that right-wing groups and personalities are not being censored and blacklisted on the big social media sites. This is obviously not true. Project Veritas obtained video showing employees within these companies admitting that people with right-wing views are censored and blacklisted in a variety of ways. They even interviewed a whistleblower from Pinterest who exposed all sorts of chicanery.

There’s also a huge list of high profile right-wingers who have been banned from these sites. Yet despite that, these “journalists” troll their audiences and claim that these things are not happening.

Take in point a recent Washington Post video claiming that Donald Trump was wrong about all the obvious censorship that’s taken place.

Jim Acosta and CNN reporters constantly trolling Donald Trump and White House staff

Jim Acosta’s role and the role of other CNN reporters who have covered the White House has only been to troll Donald Trump and his staff. It’s abundantly clear that they are not there to report facts about what’s happening in the White House. All they do is harass Trump and his staff with sarcastic and smug questions. There’s numerous examples of Acosta doing this.

And on top of that, a CNN reporter named Brian Karem went so far as to challenge former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka to a fight by asking him to “step outside” on the White House grounds the day of Trump’s recent social media summit. When Gorka responded to him by calling him a “punk,” media outlets selectively edited the clips to only show Gorka calling him out without showing what transpired before.

Take in point this clip from the Washington Post.

A video clip posted by Mediaite clearly shows Karem asking him to “step outside,” which everyone knows is a phrase commonly used to challenge someone to a fight.

Huffington Post publishing fake quotes from Daily Stormer Publisher Andrew Anglin

We are now at a point where these “journalists” believe that they can get away with publishing fake quotes from people without correction. Anglin has written an entire article describing how the Huffington Post is allowing fake quotes attributed to him to be published while ignoring his requests to have the fake quotes removed. The fact that this is now a practice being adopted by these so-called “journalists” is completely insane and once again shows that these people are not engaging in legitimate journalism.

There’s obviously many more examples, but just these examples alone reveal the malicious level of trolling these so-called “journalists” are involved in.

When we publish satire, it is made abundantly clear that it is satire and that the satire is being used to reveal specific truths. These “journalists” do the opposite by pretending to be serious journalists in order to push lies on people. And that is why you are going to get more truth from trolls, satirists and comedians than you will these supposedly serious “journalists.” In fact, the idea that these clowns claim to be” journalists” is perhaps the biggest troll of them all.

Something spooked Jim Acosta.

Breitbart:

CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta claimed Thursday that President Donald Trump referring to the media as the “enemy of the people” could help create an environment where journalists are killed.

Speaking before the Oxford Union Society in the United Kingdom, Acosta made several attempts at justifying his confrontational style when it comes to covering the Trump administration, which has not only garnered strong rebukes from the president, but even some of his own establishment media colleagues. In his remarks, Acosta criticized President Trump for characterizing news organizations which have a partisan bend against him as “fake news” or the “enemy of the people.” 

Now, at this point, I think that a lot of people are confused and afraid.

For the most part, they’re cowering and hunkering down – except the Boomers who, like blissfully unaware children, continue to do anti-PC things by mistake.

But there will come a moment, in the not-too-distant future when that shock and fear and confusion turns into anger.

I don’t know when and I don’t know enough about mass psychology to say how… but there’s no way that this doesn’t end badly for journalists sooner rather than later.

Why?

Well, they keep harassing regular people. They film FBI raids on senior citizens’ homes, accuse soccer moms of being Russian agents and ruin teenagers’ lives for FaceCrime.

There’s no way someone doesn’t get really mad about their life getting ruined before this is all over. 

So Jim is right to be worried.

There are only lay-offs and lynchings in the future of the profession.

I don’t know how anyone on the right could disagree with putting Alex Jones next to Jim Acosta in the White House press room.

Even people who think Alex is nuts or whatever – who cares? If you think he’s nuts, then that’s all the more reason to put him next to Jim Acosta.

Furthermore, I don’t think Alex Jones actually is nuts, but do believe that a person who is literally clinically insane would ask better questions than virtually everyone currently in the press corps.

Also, Alex Jones is just going to use most of his question time shilling nutritional supplements anyway.

So please, shill this petition everywhere.

It’s really a disgrace that after ten days, it only has 40k signatures.

It’s like motherfuckers don’t even know that there is a war on for their minds.

I thought Jones was going to move to DC and just agitate politicians full-time after he got banned from most of the internet.

That Marco Rubio confrontation is one of the single best things that’s happened this year.

Marco is such a little faggot, thinking he can take down Alex Jones.

Whether or not he jacks off to trannies, Alex Jones is the archetypal symbol of masculinity, and I wish so badly Marco would have swung on him.

He’s the Charles Bronson of the internet.

Does the commie spic twerp Rubio think he could have taken down Bronson in his prime?

Speaking of people who could easily beat the shit out of Marco Rubio, Tucker has made it a daily thing to talk about AJ and the rest of us getting cockblocked.

This is great because he’s defending us, but it’s also like… he’s getting ready for his own back-up plan, when he gets kicked off of Fox News.

I wish he would have Jones on to promote this petition.

He’s saying he’s just going to walk out if Jim Acosta starts acting insane again.

He also said it’s not that big of a deal, but that he’s going to push for rules to expel people like Jim.

It’s a bit disappointing. I would very much have liked him to just lay down the law, and declare executive right to overrule the judge. This is such a trivial situation, that it would be the perfect point to come out with “no, judge is wrong, I’m right, we’re doing it my way.”

Just generally, these last two weeks since the election have been disappointing. I don’t understand what direction Trump is going in, and he doesn’t really seem to be going in any direction.

Yesterday there was a big news item that I didn’t get a chance to cover about how “prison reform” (codeword for letting nigger crack dealers out of jail) – something that absolutely none of Trump’s supporters want – was going through with bipartisan support. I didn’t get to cover it because it quickly turned out that wasn’t actually happening, because it had been voted on in May and never made it to the Senate.

But it was just a weird spectacle.

Lots of weird nonsense going on.

I’m very happy about a lot of what Trump is doing on Twitter, but this stuff is not coming off of Twitter into real life. And that has been a pattern for a long time. And yes, of course I understand that Trump doesn’t really have very much power – but he could start making ultra-aggressive moves and pushing for more, real power. It is technically within his ability to just go full on and start making declarations, firing people, shutting down courts – what could anyone do to stop him?

We are halfway through the first term of President Trump, and basically, nothing very much has happened. None of the insane things Hillary was going to do happened, so those things not happening is in itself a happening, and there have certainly been a lot of social changes, but in terms of real policy, what exactly do we have?

Not really anything.

I’m waiting on that to change, of course, and I will always support Trump. But I think we really do need to start figuring out ways to put pressure on him.

Establishing free speech on the internet is something that is within his ability to do. That is the thing that is most important to us. We need a campaign to get him to do it.

CNN’s Jim Acosta is not a journalist. He’s a bought and paid for political agitator who is doing dirty work on behalf of his Jewish masters. He should not have a White House press pass. 

A federal judge just ruled that the White House must temporarily restore the press pass of the fake news agitator and CNN paid political activist Jim Acosta. This order comes pending a future trial on the matter.

Daily Mail:

A federal judge handed CNN a major victory on Friday, ruling that President Donald Trump White House must temporarily restore the press credentials it stripped from the network’s chief White House correspondent last week while a lawsuit plays out.

Judge Timothy Kelly ruled that Jim Acosta’s free-press rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution outweigh ‘the government’s interest in orderly, respectful press conferences.’

He declared in a stinging defeat for the president in his war on ‘fake news’ that the White House failed to give Acosta ‘due process,’ something guaranteed in government proceedings under the Fifth Amendment.

And he suggested that the White House exaggerated its contention that Acosta physically interfered with a female intern last week as she tried to reclaim a press conference microphone.

Needless to say, this ruling is completely ridiculous and wrong. Acosta nor anybody else has a First Amendment right to a White House press pass. They especially do not have a First Amendment right to a White House press pass while breaking established protocols during a press conference. But despite that, this judge is making the case that Acosta not only has the right to a White House press pass but the right to break White House rules and protocols – under the First Amendment. This idea is so goofy and ridiculous that it’s hard to comprehend.

Even more ridiculous is the judge’s claim that revoking Acosta’s press pass violated “due process” under the Fifth Amendment. The concept of “due process” has to do with criminal legal proceedings. It has nothing to do with having certain occupational privileges revoked.

The White House press pass is not a right, it is a privilege granted to credentialed members of the media.

But if we are to entertain the idea that a White House press pass is a right, then why is a driver’s license considered to be privilege? It would seem that in today’s society, having a right to drive is far more pertinent than having a right to a White House press pass. Yet, nobody outside of a handful of libertarians are even attempting to make such an argument.

The judge based his ruling off of the Sherrill precedent. This involves the case of a reporter named Robert Sherrill who had the ACLU file a lawsuit on his behalf back in the 1970s over the issue of White House press credentials. He ultimately won the case on First Amendment and Fifth Amendment grounds.

Wikipedia:

“[…Denial of a White House press pass to a bona fide journalist violates the first amendment unless it furthers a compelling governmental interest identified by narrowly and specifically drawn standards. [….A]ppellants must publish or otherwise make publicly known the actual standard employed in determining whether an otherwise eligible journalist will obtain a White House press pass. […N]otice, opportunity to rebut, and a written decision are required because the denial of a pass potentially infringes upon first amendment guarantees. Such impairment of this interest cannot be permitted to occur in the absence of adequate procedural due process.”

It’s a flawed ruling, but even if you agree that the Sherrill case is legal precedent and must be followed, the case only applies to someone engaging in actual journalism. Does anybody actually believe that Acosta has been behaving like a journalist in his interactions with Sarah Sanders and the President of the United States? The footage clearly shows that he’s been engaging in political activism by masquerading as a journalist.

It’s not like CNN even believes in the First Amendment or the Fifth Amendment which makes this lawsuit even more comical. CNN has actively fought to prevent the Alt-Right and people like Alex Jones from speaking on the Internet. They also pushed this idea that Brett Kavanaugh was guilty of rape and sexual assault crimes based on unproven allegations alone.

But since the Sherrill precedent demands that the White House publish a standard to determine who is and isn’t eligible for press credentials, they could fix this mess fairly easily. All they have to do is modify the standard in such a way where every Jew-run fake news propaganda operation is banned from the White House grounds by default. This way it won’t look like they’re just singling out Acosta unfairly.

Even though Acosta is the worst of the bunch, the entire White House press pool is filled with political agitators who get paychecks from Jews. It’s best to find a way to have all of their credentials collectively revoked. This would leave far more credible news organizations like the Daily Stormer as the only one’s left asking the questions.

[Editor’s Note: Or Trump could just stop doing press conferences and replace them with YouTube livestreams with super chats. Make CNN donate to Trump 2020 every time they want to ask a question. -AA]

Fox News really isn’t a whole lot different than the big Jew-run media networks.

Make no mistake about it, Fox News has never been on our side. During the George W. Bush years, they were enthusiastic supporters of the Iraq war. They regularly aired the commentary of neoconservative Jews who pushed all sorts of insane pro-Israel war propaganda.

After Donald Trump won the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016, they were forced to shift gears and adopt a slightly more populist, pro-Trump spin on things. It now appears as if the network’s leadership is steering away from that.

They’ve even decided to publicly denounce the White House’s ban on CNN’s fake news agitator Jim Acosta.

Axios:

Fox News is supporting CNN’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over the White House’s revocation of Jim Acosta’s press pass and plans to file an amicus brief in the case, according to a statement from the network’s president Jay Wallace.

“FOX News supports CNN in its legal effort to regain its White House reporter’s press credential. We intend to file an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court. Secret Service passes for working White House journalists should never be weaponized. While we don’t condone the growing antagonistic tone by both the President and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people.”

So Fox News claims they support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people. Well if that’s the case, why didn’t Fox News issue a statement denouncing the entire Alt-Right getting banished from social media in 2017? Or the push to get the Daily Stormer thrown off the Internet? Or what about the recent social media bans of Alex Jones?

For some reason we did not hear a whole lot from Fox News management on these subjects. But when a jackass activist posing as a news reporter gets banned from the White House after a slap-fight with an intern, Fox News management feels compelled to issue a written statement of support.

This is obviously insane considering Acosta’s behavior over the past couple of years. He has consistently tried to make himself the center of the story with his continued agitations against Sarah Sanders and the President himself.

And nobody has a First Amendment right to access the White House grounds and ask the President of the United States questions. But despite that, CNN is suing the White House claiming violations of the First Amendment and Fifth Amendment occurred because they banned Acosta for his unruly behavior. The fact that Fox News is supporting this lawsuit is ridiculous.

Even Bob Woodward (the goy half of Woodward and Bernstein) has criticized CNN’s legal action.

Free Beacon:

Bob Woodward, a best-selling author and critic of President Donald Trump, said Tuesday night that CNN’s lawsuit against the Trump administration wasn’t the “remedy.”

Woodward, who gained fame for breaking the Watergate scandal, spoke at the Global Financial Leadership Conference in Naples, Florida where he recommended “more serious reporting” about what Trump’s actions, according to remarks flagged by the Washington Examiner.

“In the news media there has been an emotional reaction to Trump,” NBC News reporter Dylan Byers reported Woodward as saying. “Too many people for Trump or against Trump have become emotionally unhinged about this.”

But outside of Tucker Carlson and a small handful of other personalities, Fox News airs lots of fake conservative garbage. They even give air time to the likes of the anti-Trump homosexual Shepard Smith and the Jew Chris Wallace.

And the fact that they blocked Fox News personalities from supporting Carlson on Twitter in recent days, says a great deal about the general direction of the network. Carlson’s family was physically threatened by a gang of anti-fascists outside his home. You would think that the network would want its people expressing their full support on social media. Instead, they decided to do some type of weird Twitter boycott. This did not appear to be a very smart decision by Fox News management.

Based on these and other developments, don’t be surprised to see Fox News venture further and further into libtard territory.

"The First Amendment is one of the most important bulwarks of our liberty and our freedom," says attorney Ted Olson, representing CNN in its lawsuit against the White House. "Journalists cannot be silenced, censored or intimidated." https://t.co/kK9XPrAqnG pic.twitter.com/O9YuZoXdrm

— CNN (@CNN) November 13, 2018

CNN is officially suing President Trump over Jim Acosta’s press credentials being revoked.

Axios:

CNN is suing President Trump and “several of his aides” over the White House’s revocation of Jim Acosta’s press pass, per CNN.

Details: The lawsuit is being filed Tuesday morning, and alleges that CNN and Acosta’s First and Fifth Amendment rights are being violated. The defendants in the lawsuit include press secretary Sarah Sanders, chief of staff John Kelly, Secret Service director Joseph Clancy, deputy chief of staff for communications Bill Shine, President Trump, and the Secret Service officer who took Acosta’s pass last week.

I don’t understand what this means.

I have read several long articles about it, and none of them have made it clear to me what press credentials have to do with the First Amendment, or how it can be illegal for the White House to decide who is allowed in to talk to the President and his staff.

The First Amendment assures freedom of speech, not freedom of entry to the White House.

If any news person was allowed to have access to the White House, then I could demand a press pass. In fact, anyone with a website could. If there was some law that said people with a certain size audience were automatically allowed a press pass to the White House, that would be a very weird law. And one of these articles would say it.

Furthermore, it would mean that several YouTubers would be eligible for such passes. Alex Jones would be, as his audience was significantly bigger than that of a lot of other major news outlets before he was shut down.

Speaking of the First Amendment and CNN and Alex Jones – what did CNN publish when there was an organized conspiracy by the entire tech industry to shut down Alex Jones?

Huh.

CNN also played a lead role in claiming that Trump’s “rhetoric” caused that Filipino guy to send those fake bombs, and then said that “hate speech” caused the Gunfight at O.K. Synagogue.

They also argued for a system of monitoring everyone’s speech on the internet to determine if they were a true hater, and then sending the cops to their homes.

That is not technically an attack on people’s right to speak, exactly, but the clear purpose is to cause a chilling effect, where people are afraid to post on the internet for fear that the cops will show up at their door and accuse them of pre-crime.

They have been publishing at least one article a day about hate speech as of late, and this one was posted 11 hours ago, which would be approximately the exact same time that they publicly announced their lawsuit against Donald Trump.

Also Tuesday on CNN, in an article written by two women who appear to be Jewish, CNN directly suggested that my freedom of speech would lead to people being murdered.

There was a TV segment as well, though it did not make the outrageous and chilling claim that my words would cause violence that was made in the print version.

(I don’t know if this indicates the blockade on coverage of this site is over – I do hope so. I am well-prepared for round three.)

CNN has a years-long history of agitating to have me personally silenced.

GoDaddy boots a neo-Nazi website after a derogatory story on Heather Heyer, the woman killed in Charlottesville https://t.co/j3ORVUDO7k

— CNN (@CNN) August 14, 2017

Another tech company cuts ties with neo-Nazi website after derogatory story on Charlottesville victim Heather Heyer https://t.co/TikmdDSQLg

— CNN (@CNN) August 17, 2017

CNN’s lawyer says “journalists cannot be silenced, censored or intimidated.”

Well, I am a journalist, and all three of those things have been done to me – and CNN has been at the forefront of this campaign. Jim Acosta has had none of those things done to him – he had his privilege to access the White House revoked.

So not only am I having a very hard time grasping how exactly Jim Acosta’s press pass relates to freedom of speech, I am having an equally difficult time going along with the idea that CNN cares a whole lot about freedom of speech.

It’s a very weird situation.

I would not especially expect that CNN of all people would be interested, at this point in history, in having a large public discussion about the nature of freedom of speech on Donald Trump’s terms, which is the exact thing that they are asking for by pushing this issue.

It is blatantly obvious that there is nothing that they can gain from it materially. It’s not a suit they can win. The apparent goal is to agitate for the idea that Trump is against free speech, but they are in the midst of engaging in the biggest agitation against free speech in American history, as part of a media-wide conspiracy to crackdown on anyone who questions any aspect of the official narrative (yes, this has gone way beyond Jews now).

Trump doesn’t have to come out and say “oh and what did CNN say about Alex Jones?” He could come out and say that, but he doesn’t have to. Tucker Carlson and an entire chorus of people are going to be pointing out that CNN is decidedly against the First Amendment, yet is citing the First Amendment in a situation that has nothing at all to do with the First Amendment.

I think this is a bad move on their part. But Jews generally do not appear to be acting rationally these days.

.@acosta has comported himself with remarkable restraint while dealing with this Imposter-in-Chief. But as people in Hollywood have long known — everything is harder when you're working with animals. pic.twitter.com/5sQGaEgeeT

— Jim Carrey (@JimCarrey) November 10, 2018

Oh my Gawd so hilarious.

Trump is a horse’s ass.

I also like that Jim Carrey is willing to defend assaulting interns after he drove his girlfriend to suicide after giving her herpes and many other sexual diseases. Many people would lay off supporting attacks on women after doing that – many people are cowards.

Jim Carrey on the other hand – he is a brave and original comedic mastermind.

Greetings from Paris where we are on the ground for Trump’s trip to France. #1A pic.twitter.com/rno9bPFcJV

— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) November 9, 2018

This karate-chopping, intern-raping freak is just following the President around everywhere, hoping to moralize him and nag him like a little bitch.

This is disgusting.

Daily Mail:

CNN reporter Jim Acosta tweeted a defiant message to Donald Trump from Paris Friday, saying he intends to cover the president’s trip there despite being stripped of White House press credentials.

The reporter tweeted a view of the Eiffel Tower and said: ‘Greetings from Paris where we are on the ground for Trump’s trip to France. #1A’

The hashtag is a reference to the first amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press.

There is nothing in the First Amendment that guarantees press White House press credentials, let alone the right to hold onto a mic and use karate on poor intern females.

If White House press credentials were a guaranteed Constitutional right, anyone could ask for them and have a right to get them.

Conversely, the First Amendment clearly guarantees that the Daily Stormer’s right to have a website, something which CNN actively lobbied against.

CNN has deleted that article, but they did many saying the same thing.

The “private company” argument would not hold up in any true Constitutional court, given that all of these alleged private companies – more than two dozen of them, virtually every America-based registrar – colluded together to attempt to ensure DS wasn’t allowed online.

Jim Acosta is a disgrace.

Acosta’s French message suggests that he will attempt to gain access to events attended by Trump to commemorate the end of World War One even though he no longer carries Secret Service-issued press credentials.

Those credentials are themselves meaningless in Paris, raising the possibility that he will once again be in proximity to the president.

Trump, speaking before his departure, said that he hasn’t decided how long Acosta will be banned from the White House, and threatened to revoke the credentials of other reporters next.

There’s a nonzero chance that the Secret Service is going to find this guy naked on the White House lawn, trying to stare into someone’s bedroom window in the near future.

What defenseless woman is he going to karate chop sexually assault next? Melania?

Fuck you, Jim.