SHEKELS, BABY!

Welp.

There goes that.

New York Times:

Pennsylvania will apparently not have a statewide recount of its votes, removing the last long-shot hope by opponents of Donald J. Trump that a review of the ballots could overturn his election as president.

In a filing on Saturday, a lawyer for Jill Stein, the Green Party presidential candidate, who began the recount bids in Pennsylvania — as well as in Michigan and Wisconsin — said “petitioners are regular citizens of ordinary means” and could not afford a $1 million bond payment that was ordered by Pennsylvania courts.

Lawyers for Pennsylvania Republicans and Mr. Trump had asked a judge on Thursday to dismiss Ms. Stein’s request, saying she had not identified any fraud or illegal activity during the Nov. 8 election.

The evidence of fraud was a claim by computer scientists that if Russia had hacked the election there would be no evidence. Thus, the evidence was that there was no evidence.

That was the actual argument.

Lawrence J. Tabas, the general counsel of the Republican Party of Pennsylvania, said on Saturday that the withdrawal served as “recognition” that the Stein-led effort was “completely without merit,” and that the decision to drop the case “assures that President-elect Trump will be declared the winner by the Electoral College,” which meets on Dec. 19.

In a statement, Ms. Stein left open the possibility that she had further plans in Pennsylvania, and promised a “major announcement” on Monday morning. She criticized the $1 million bond needed to proceed with a recount.

The announcement is likely to be her purchase of a beachfront condo in Tel Aviv.

BEACHFRONT, BABY!

“This is yet another sign that Pennsylvania’s antiquated election law is stacked against voters,” Ms. Stein said. “We will pursue every available remedy to ensure Pennsylvanians can trust what happened in this election.”

Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, trails Mr. Trump by 49,543 votes in the state, according to data from the Pennsylvania Department of State. As voting results were updated this week, Mr. Trump’s lead in Pennsylvania had shrunk by about 20,000 votes. Mrs. Clinton would have needed to be declared the winner in all three recount states to overturn the Electoral College result.

…

Ms. Stein has gained more traction pushing for recounts in the other two battleground states, where Mr. Trump leads by narrow margins.

…

Ms. Stein is funding the recount bids, having collected $6.9 million as of Saturday evening. Opponents, though, are concerned that local governments, particularly in Michigan, will end up shouldering millions of dollars in costs.

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign has played a muted role in the efforts, only passively participating and paying for lawyers to be present during recounts.

Remember that I told you this wasn’t a real issue.

Also remember that infowars and Paul Joseph Watson said this was THE BIG HAPPENING.

All this was from the beginning was Jill Stein, a Jew, exploiting an emotional fragile group of people to gain millions of dollars. No one serious ever thought it was a real thing.

She’s going to clear several million dollars on this little scam.

So, there you have it.

There no longer stands any challenge to Donald Trump’s ascendancy to the throne.

2016 Electoral Map: Solid red except for a few blue pimples

The Yiddish word “chutzpah” has become street lingo across different linguistic groups that have been in contact with Jews. Interestingly, its use is unique in that it is used to emphasize degree rather than concept. Even though English has equivalent words – brazen, audacious, nerve – none of these can adequately describe the total lack of respect Jews have for the will of their host peoples.

Once again, American Jewry is begging for a confrontation with the white Gentile majority that elected Donald Trump as president. A new series of concocted schemes, following the template of Max Schulman’s Rally Round the Flag, Boys (“Run it up the mast, and let’s see if anybody salutes“), have been featured throughout mainstream media – which at this point is nothing more than an nation-wide brainstorming session for how to block Trump from taking office.

Elite coastal Jewry has for years grown accustomed to simply muting, belittling, shutting-out and ignoring the white working people who founded, built and keep America running. If you’re a gifted white male from the heartland or an urban working class ethnic white (who isn’t a homosexual), you’re not going to ever get into any ivy league school. If you’re a Southerner, you’re only invited into the airless room for the sole purpose of Jews of hearing your accent and snickering. If you say “maybe all lives matter,” they’ll delete you from Facebook and hang the horns of “racist” on your head (if you let them).

People got fed up with being hated for no reason other than our race, and made a statement at the ballot box. But the wandering leech with the number 6 nose is not going to let those icky rednecks who can’t appreciate the brilliance of Hamilton have their day without a fight.

Let’s take a brief look at these various Jewish plots.

(((Jill Stein))) and (((Gabriel Sherman))): Bogus Hacking Claim

Jill Stein’s collection plate has been overflowing with cash as of late (unlike the Green Party’s presidential campaign), and she has succeeded in mounting a legal campaign to force a recount in at least one of the rust belt states (Wisconsin), promising more to come.

The premise from which she launched her campaign relies entirely on a fake news piece written by the Jew Gabriel Sherman, called “Experts Urge Clinton Campaign to Challenge Election Results in 3 Swing States,” published in the Zionist controlled New York Magazine. In it, Sherman cites University of Michigan computer security expert J. Alex Halderman, claiming that he has found “persuasive evidence” that machines in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania were “hacked” in favor of Trump:

Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

The lawyer Bonifaz is a DNC operative looking to stir the pot, but Halderman himself is relatively credible.

The problem is, Sherman took what Halderman said completely out of context in order to cast suspicion over the legitimacy of the election.  Halderman in his interview with Sherman was musing about the potential for hacking to have occurred in these states, but admitted he had no evidence – that it was only speculation and probably didn’t happen.

He was forced to correct the record himself on Medium:

You may have read at NYMag that I’ve been in discussions with the Clinton campaign about whether it might wish to seek recounts in critical states. That article, which includes somebody else’s description of my views, incorrectly describes the reasons manually checking ballots is an essential security safeguard (and includes some incorrect numbers, to boot). Let me set the record straight about what I and other leading election security experts have actually been saying to the campaign and everyone else who’s willing to listen.

…

“Were this year’s deviations from pre-election polls the results of a cyberattack? Probably not. I believe the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked. But I don’t believe that either one of these seemingly unlikely explanations is overwhelmingly more likely than the other. The only way to know whether a cyberattack changed the result is to closely examine the available physical evidence — paper ballots and voting equipment in critical states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, nobody is ever going to examine that evidence unless candidates in those states act now, in the next several days, to petition for recounts.”

So while Halderman is being facetious, experts like this have been arguing about this possibility for the last few elections and always call for recounts on paper ballots. What is different this time is that Jews don’t approve of the result, so suddenly a security director talking about the a remote chance of malfeasance turns into “experts believe they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania have been manipulated or hacked.”

Everyone involved knows that this is not the case, but the goal is incitement, not genuine concern about tampering unique to the 2016 election.

(((Daniel Brezenoff))) and (((Peter Beinert))): Jew Launches Petition to Ignore Electoral College and Elect Hillary on Grounds of Popular Vote

A number of social media celebrities have given traction to an online petition started by Daniel Brezenoff to get Electoral College voters to support the popular vote rather than the will of the states they are assigned to.

Change.org:

Americans, and his impulsivity, bullying, lying, admitted history of sexual assault, and utter lack of experience make him a danger to the Republic.

Secretary Clinton WON THE POPULAR VOTE and should be President.

Hillary won the popular vote. The only reason Trump “won” is because of the Electoral College.

But the Electoral College can actually give the White House to either candidate. So why not use this most undemocratic of our institutions to ensure a democratic result?

SHE WON THE POPULAR VOTE.

The petition is a textbook example of how the system has grown accustomed  in managing its “democracy”: only accept the results if it lines up with the ruling plutocracy’s desire. The label of “Populism” is openly deployed by our system as a pejorative, even though this is the Oxford Dictionary definition of it:

A member or adherent of a political party seeking to represent the interests of ordinary people.

The interests of ordinary people, represented by “racists” like Trump, are – using the system’s own discourse – a “threat to democracy.” That’s a tacit admission that a majority of the electorate is ready for racial nationalism, and that modern day oligarchic “democracy” is engineered to deceive the people by presenting dog-piss snow as a “Lemon Snow Cone.”

For all their shortcomings, the founding fathers designed the electoral college precisely to protect ordinary people in the United States from the tyranny of large groups of minorities and rich people concentrated in a few places (like the urban zones of California and New York City) being able to dictate policy unilaterally to people who far outnumber them and disagree but are spread out over the other 48 states.

If the electoral college were ignored or abolished, it would lead to full scale civil war. But Jew Brezenoff, along with the 4,637,521 signatories who outsource their political views to celebrities, foolishly believe it is still possible to ignore and write off the will of the white majority.

Another intensely anti-white Jew, Peter Beinart, has tried to articulate this petition with a superficially sound argument in a propaganda piece for the fake news site The Atlantic:

To modern American ears, it sounds insanely undemocratic for electors to ignore the will of the people of their state. But were Hamilton alive, he might wonder why Americans find this undemocratic feature of the Electoral College so outrageous while taking its other undemocratic features virtually for granted. For instance, each state gets as many electors as it has members of the House of Representatives and Senate. (The District of Columbia now gets a few, too). That is itself undemocratic. It’s undemocratic because while representatives are allocated between the states via population, senators are not. Each state gets two: Whether it has 38 million people (California) or half a million (Wyoming). Because states, not people, are represented equally in the Senate, the Senate is undemocratic. And because a state’s number of electors is based partly on its number of senators, the Electoral College is thus partially undemocratic too.

This is what Jews do. They push for their own tiny ethnic group’s interests by putting their demands in someone like Alexander Hamilton’s mouth (who’s dead and can’t defend himself) and hope you don’t notice what they’re doing.

(((Jeffrey K. Tulis))), (((Sanford Levinson))) and (((Jeremi Suri))): Get Electors to Vote Against Hillary, to Entice Enough GOP Electors to Vote Against Trump, to Then Elect Kasich in Cuck-Run House of Representatives

This plot gets an A for effort, as it’s a devious take on corner-cutting.

The three Jewish university “experts” Tulis, Levinson and Suri (yes, even the one with the Indian name is  a Jew) appear to be wearing their “Principled Conservative” costume for this one. In Mort Zuckerman’s Daily News, they put out a blueprint intended for both Democrats and Republicans to work together to get a Neo-Con – any Neo-Con – elected:

Instead of asking Republican electors to vote for Hillary Clinton, we suggest that Democrats organize electors from a state Clinton won to vote for someone else, in order to persuade Republican electors in other states to do the same. Democrats must show that they are not trying to push Clinton into the presidency (despite her victory in the popular vote), but acting to find a qualified alternative to Trump. That is the only goal that can unite Democrats and Republicans.

California, with its bounty of 55 electoral votes, currently pledged to Clinton, could take the lead. The Democratic leadership of the state should reach out to moderate Republicans in other states, and contemplate potential Republican alternatives to Trump — perhaps John Kasich or Mitt Romney or Mike Pence (although he is closely tied to Trump’s hateful campaign and early administration selections). If only 37 electors from states Trump won join this bi-partisan effort, the election will be thrown into the House of Representatives, where the Republican majority can then make a final choice.

…

His early administration selections are figures rejected by the mainstream Republican Party for their extreme positions on these issues, their unethical behavior and their sheer incompetence. Trump is creating a team of untethered haters in the White House who will plunge our nation into a disaster that no one outside of his immediate circle wants.

Many of the Republican electors recognize this, and they would prefer a different President for the good of their party and the country. Most of the electors should know that voting for Trump will not protect them from his personal attacks on what they care most about. He has proven himself, in the campaign and since Nov. 8, willing to hurt any individuals who challenge him. Giving him more power as President will imperil his supporters as much as his opponents. Republican electors have a strong self-interest in finding someone else.

This plan is so crazy, it might just work. Six Hillary Clinton Electors have already declared themselves “faithless electors,” who will thus vote against Hillary if they can successfully lobby GOP electors to vote against Trump.

They are probably being bribed and oriented by bigger powers, but the media is already trying to make this potential conspiracy palatable by gaming the public with claims that Trump is “already flip-flopping” on campaign promises.

So far, if you read fake reports put out by Jewish disinfo services like Reuters, working class white people are supposed to be upset that Trump is going to keep the provision in Obamacare that lets you keep children in the poorest generation in decades on your health insurance until age 26, while preventing private insurance from blocking coverage for people who are sick and need help. What normal person would get angry at this? Jews in the press apparently think it’s going to work.

In the end, I would say to Chutzpathic Jews: “Do it!”

Jews trying to steal Trump’s election after his millions of ardent, armed and angry supporters have been told he won for weeks would be like the Yippee Ki-yay scene at the end of Die Hard. The fuse will be lit.

Seeing as not one person pushing for this travesty and fraud is a non-Jew, Jews may very well be pogrommed in the street in such an occasion. The greatest threat to democracy is not terrorists who want Sharia law, it’s wormy Yids monopolizing our think-tanks, academia and media loudspeakers – it’s time President-Elect Trump to start treating them as what they are.

Maybe if we count the votes enough times, the green party will end up winning.

Unable to contain her hate for America any longer, Green Party candidate and consummate Jewess Jill Stein is trying to undermine the Glorious Leader’s work before he’s even had a chance to start.

Stein’s share of the vote hovered around 2%; she was beaten completely even by goofy “weed lmao” libertarian Gary Johnson. Thus, it’s quite obvious that this is not done to somehow seek any kind of victory for herself (outside of publicity), but rather out of the Jew’s impulsive need to destroy anything good and beautiful.

New York Daily News:

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein quickly raised the money she aimed to bring in to file for ballot recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — and now she’s looking for more.

Stein, who launched the fundraising effort to file for recounts Wednesday, hit her initial $2.5 million goal and then upped it Thursday to $4.5 million.

As of mid-afternoon Thursday, she had raised $3.94 million.

The third party candidate launched the recount effort after a group of election lawyers and data experts asked Hillary Clinton’s campaign to call for a recount to make sure a hack or cyberattack had not skewed results in the three states, which Clinton lost by small margins to Donald Trump.

No evidence has emerged that any such attack occurred.

No evidence? What about this self-admitted Russian hacker?

I somehow doubt the Clinton campaign is particularly interested in having people investigate the vote too closely.

That’s because they know they didn’t lose the election due to voter fraud – they lost it in spite of voter fraud.

I don’t imagine it’s possible to examine those ballots without also discovering whatever fraud the Clinton camp engaged in.

“These recounts are part of an election integrity movement to attempt to shine a light on just how untrustworthy the U.S. election system is,” Stein said in a statement announcing her fundraiser.

The group that contacted the Clinton campaign, led by voting rights attorney John Bonifaz and computer security expert J. Alex Halderman, pointed out the possibility that Clinton may have received fewer votes than expected in counties using electronic voting machines.

Yeah, must be the Russians, I guess.

By the way, didn’t this Jewess complain that Hillary Clinton was going to start World War 3 against Russia just last month? Why is she trying to boost Clinton to the white house now, if she thinks it’ll cause double you double you eye eye eye?

In any case, even if Hillary were to be declared the winner, it wouldn’t make much difference to her.

Have you seen the latest pictures that came out of Clinton? She looks about 20 years older than before the election.

She may well already be dead at time of writing.

We have to institute a complete ban on Hillarys until we figure out what the hell is going on.

Defeat has already taken it’s toll on the woman (stopping the drugs that were keeping her peppy didn’t help her face-freshness either, I would assume). She is but a mere shadow now, her shattered frame sacrificed on the altar of greed and corruption.

She just needs more shekels to save your freedoms and democracies, goyim.

Green candidate Jill Stein is supporting Trump. She says he’s better than Hillary.

If Trump's campaign is flailing, does a "spoiler" vote even exist anymore? Don't waste your vote on corporate Democrats. #InvestYourVote

— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) October 12, 2016

She is literally the single Jew.

And I guess Matt Drudge.

She has way cooler graphics than Drudge though.

Unlike the Democrats and Republicans, we don't cuddle up to Wall Street and special interests with our "public" and "private" positions. pic.twitter.com/guiOo5S1on

— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) October 12, 2016

We should have been trolling for this Jewess for the last few months. If she can get 3-4% we win, even in a close race.