Interesting clip of what the Chinese are saying about the TikTok ban… 🤔 pic.twitter.com/xlAl1FwPuM

— James Li (@5149jamesli) January 19, 2025

All over Chinese media, the Chinese were saying that the reason the US tried to ban TikTok is that the US is controlled by the Jews.

This is a very big topic of discussion in China. They have university classes explaining that the US is totally controlled by the Jews, and showing all the proof.

My website is very popular in China.

Anti-Sinoism on the American right is a sickening cancer, pushed by the worst kikes like Ben Shapiro.

Donald Trump is at least making an effort to be cool with the Chinese, though it’s obviously impossible that he has that power. But it just speaks to the absurdity of the fact that so many “conservative” Americans are fixated on hating the one country that is capable of creating a future humans would actually want to live in.

Obviously, the reason conservatives are so aggressive in hating the Chinese is because they are stupid and brainwashed by goofy propaganda. If you listen to these people, they just rattle off complete nonsense about “social credit,” which is a hoax, and “communism,” another hoax. The data is all available, but these people are just so dumb they can easily be manipulated by goofy media into hating and wanting war with people who should be a natural ally of oppressed peoples in America.

Americans are so fat, they actually think America has a better standard of living than China. It’s unbelievable. You show them videos of China and they say they’re fake, that China is secretly poor somehow.

They see a country where you can openly talk about the Jews, and then what do they say? Do they go full Ben Shapiro? Probably!

We’ll see what Trump’s stated plan for TikTok actually turns out to be. If he calls for total Chinese divestment, that is clearly a sign that the US is ramping up for a war.

Everything looks like the US is getting prepared for a war with China.

I think it will probably take a form more like the Ukraine war, some kind of limited thing, but they are swarming the South China Sea, they are arranging everything in a manner that makes it clear they are preparing for war.

Honestly, I don’t think Trump wants that, and he might push back on it, but he has no ability to prevent it. As we saw with the first Trump presidency, his powers are very limited.

Beit Hanoun witnesses the biggest impact from last night atttack on Gaza. The Zionist has been targetting public buildings and houses. As of now, 119 people have died including 31 children. #AqsaUnderAttack #Palestine pic.twitter.com/km2dSNEbw1

— Ikhwan #FreePalestine🇵🇸 (@JatIkhwan) May 14, 2021

This is a great plan, Jews: just accuse anyone who protests against you leveling people’s homes and killing children of anti-Semitism.

This will work, Jews. Just accuse all detractors of being filled with hatred. Say they are only pretending to care about dead children, and actually they secretly hate you for no reason.

There is nothing that could possibly go wrong if you do that, and it will allow you to keep killing kids forever without any consequences.

Literally the perfect plan.

AP:

Germany’s leading Jewish group on Thursday sharply condemned protests in front of a synagogue in the western city of Gelsenkirchen as “pure antisemitism.”

Several other German cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Hannover have seen anti-Israeli protests over the past few days. At least two synagogues were attacked, and several Israeli flags were torn down and burned since the latest eruption of violence in Israel and the Gaza Strip.

The Central Council of Jews in Germany tweeted a video of dozens of protesters in Gelsenkirchen waving Palestinian and Turkish flags and yelling expletives about Jews.

“Jew hatred in the middle of Gelsenkirchen in front of the synagogue. The times in which Jews were cursed in the middle of the street should have long been over. This is pure antisemitism, nothing else!” the group tweeted.

Yep!

It’s just like the Holocaust when people say you should stop killing all those children for no reason.

Before you complain about this or any of the much worse photos I won’t show: you need to think long and hard about the suffering the Jews went through during World War II, and then just shut up because you’re an anti-Semite.

It will especially help to make Jews more popular if the German government hunts down and arrests anyone who complains about them murdering children.

The German government repeatedly condemned anti-Israeli and antisemitic attacks earlier this week and said that “the perpetrators must be found and held responsible and Jewish institutions must be protected thoroughly.”

On Thursday, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas told Funke Media Group that “there must be zero tolerance for attacks on synagogues in our country.”

“All of us are called on to make it very clear that we do not accept if Jews in Germany are made responsible for the events in the Middle East — neither in the streets nor on social media,” Maas added.

The protests in Gelsenkirchen on Wednesday were dispersed by police, German news agency dpa reported, but authorities reported further incidents in other parts of the country.

Some cities which had hoisted Israeli flags in front of their city halls on Wednesday in remembrance of the start of German-Israeli diplomatic relations on May 12, 1965, reported that the flags were torn down and sometimes burned.

An Israeli flag in front of a city hall in the western town of Solingen was torn and burnt and two Israeli flags in Berlin were also torn down late Wednesday night.

The government and the Jew media can try to equate protests with “attacks on synagogues,” but they might find that this doesn’t really work very well after an extended year long worldwide protest movement where the media claimed that violence can never discredit “peaceful protesters.”

This is not 2014 anymore. Over the last 5 years, we’ve all been subjected to an intense media indoctrination program claiming that there is nothing more important on earth than brown people.

Now, the Jews are deciding they want to go in and murder a bunch of brown people, and they think they can use memes calling people who oppose them “racists”?

It’s a really hard sell.

This is what happening now!!!
Is it okay ?????
Oh god 😔😔😔 save them#Palestine#GazaUnderAttack pic.twitter.com/JxkME5VQgC

— Huda badran🇵🇸 (@HudaBadran2) May 14, 2021

Israel is finished with Gaza, or does it want to kill more children? Have Israel’s studied in their schools how to kill?
The child dies wearing Eid clothes💔#Israel #IsraeliTerrorism #GazaUnderAttack #GazaUnderAttackk1 #GenocideinGaza #غزة_تحت_القضف #Palestine pic.twitter.com/c3ZYrTp2xk

— sara qu 🇵🇸 (@saraalqurashi6) May 14, 2021

Of course, they have the entire establishment behind them, including all Western governments and the internet censorship machine. So we’ll see how they do. But I think they’re going to have a pretty hard time garnering sympathy.

Ultimately, it doesn’t mean much. No protest is going to result in Israel stopping their bloodlust murder frenzy against the Arabs. However, it may result in people generally growing to loath the Jews. It may open people up to discussing this issue a bit more frankly.

The claim made by governments that synagogues that fly the Israeli flag are somehow not representative of Israel is a good lie to crush. All Jews who are not actively opposed to Israel are supporters of Israel. All of them can claim citizenship whenever they want to claim citizenship, meaning that even if they are not dual citizens, they can become dual citizens whenever they want, so they de facto already are.

Among other things, in this new war I’m seeing a lot of Asians on searches through Twitter.

Somehow i saw many isra3l supporter under top #/Palestine (in thai). Anyone who has this full temple pls reply this tweet with it. I will try to translate them and hopefully they can see it pic.twitter.com/PlfQFEmPPL

— iru นักแปลของคุณ 🇵🇸 (@chansbiceps) May 14, 2021

I guess maybe that is just a Chinese operation, spreading anti-Israel stuff in Asia, but either way it’s interesting.

Just opening up discussion about the Jewish problem is always a good thing.

Adolf Hitler never killed any babies. 

A woman killed herself in New York City, and it’s making the rounds in the media, because with standard female vanity, she posted her suicide note on instagram, scheduling it to appear after she was already dead.

The 24-year-old named Yocheved Gourarie and she’s Jewish. I’m not going to mourn her death, because I mean, the world has enough self-centered sluts who think people should pay attention to them, and I hate to say it, but we have more than enough Jews.

However, what I want to talk about is the place she chose to kill herself: the Vessel in Manhattan.

It is a disgusting art installation that is supposed to look like an alien spaceship.

This is a physical structure that screams out: “Hey. Hey! Kill yourself! Hey, kill yourself!”

It’s surrounded by many buildings which are just as bad, if not worse.

We really need to start thinking about what we are doing to our brains and our souls by putting this kind of garbage in our environment.

Maybe a high profile suicide off the top of one of these structures will cause people to think about that?

But no, it probably won’t.

It will probably just be the fault of white men, somehow.

Laura Loomer is a fighter for justice, freedom and true glory. The problem is that her platform is really confusing, as she claims that Moslems should be silenced but she shouldn’t be silenced because she’s Jewish. She says that Jews have a right to free speech because of the Holocaust.

Of course, that isn’t a part of her lawsuit, but she’s said that enough times in public that it is going to come up in any lawsuit. It will also come up that she herself has worked to engage in silencing free speech, including getting a Daily Stormer Discord channel shut down (back when we were unaware about the agenda of Discord).

All she ever talks about is being Jewish.

Her own opposition to free speech makes her a very imperfect vessel for promoting a free speech agenda.

The Hill:

A federal appeals court is rejecting claims that tech companies like Facebook, Google, Twitter and Apple have conspired to suppress conservative viewpoints on their platforms.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Wednesday affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit that was filed by the conservative legal organization Freedom Watch and far-right activist Laura Loomer. Freedom Watch and Loomer alleged that the Silicon Valley giants were coordinating together to silence conservative viewpoints and that they were violating the First Amendment and antitrust policies.

“The district court dismissed the complaint, holding that Freedom Watch had standing to sue but failed to allege colorable legal claims,” the judges wrote in their decision. “On appeal, we reach the same conclusion.”

…

The judges concluded that Freedom Watch failed to offer a satisfactory First Amendment claim against the tech companies, noting that “in general, the First Amendment ‘prohibits only governmental abridgment of speech.'”

“Freedom Watch fails to point to additional facts indicating that these platforms are engaged in state action and thus fails to state a viable First Amendment claim,” the judges wrote.

They also concluded that the legal group failed to provide enough evidence that the tech companies were violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The decision came down as President Trump and other Republican lawmakers voiced outrage over Twitter’s decision to fact check tweets the president sent about mail-in voting this week. In response, Trump alleged that social media platforms “totally silence” conservative views and threatened to “strongly regulate, or close them down” altogether.

“Twitter has now shown that everything we have been saying about them (and their other compatriots) is correct,” Trump tweeted. “Big action to follow!”

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) also sent a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey on Wednesday questioning whether the company should continue to receive immunity from publisher liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. 

…

Freedom Watch’s lawsuit, which was filed in 2018, claimed that illegal coordination from the tech giants was responsible for a “complete halt” to the group’s growth and Loomer’s 30-day ban from some social media platforms, Bloomberg News reported. The bans were implemented after Loomer said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) favored Sharia law and was “anti-Jewish.”

Twitter and Facebook have since permanently suspended Loomer from their platforms.

Freedom Watch founder Larry Klayman told Politico that Wednesday’s decision was “outrageous” and that he’d move to have the case reheard.  

“We’re going to obviously move for en banc reconsideration and go to the Supremes, if we have to,” he said. “Obviously, it’s a very political issue. None of those judges particularly care for [President Trump]. It looked like they rushed the decision off their desk to make a point.”

Obviously, I wish Ms. Loomer only the best, despite the issues I’ve had with her in the past.

But I don’t see anything happening here. It seems to just be another publicity stunt, Loomer sucking whatever she can out of her previous fame as a Twitter personality.

All of these people who became famous Twitter personalities during the 2016 election apparently expected that they would be famous for the rest of their lives. However, even those who were not banned from Twitter – Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, to name two – have failed to become normal media figures.

Laura Loomer is also running for Congress right now, another stupid publicity stunt.

Look at this promotional photo she’s using for her campaign.

She has a horrible hunched back, which I’m sure she’s self-conscious about (I would be too!), but that stretched neck is almost more grotesque.

I think MILO is also on some kind of quest for revenge against Twitter. But nothing associated with any of these toxic, fame-sucking personalities is ever going to lead to any single positive outcome.

If we are going to get free speech on the internet returned to us, it is going to have to be the government that does it. A civil lawsuit is not going to do it. And clearly, the government isn’t going to do it either. Donald Trump is being openly bullied by these people now, as they demonstrate that he isn’t going to do anything.

We’re about to see where this goes…

AP:

Harvey Weinstein believed he was so powerful he could get away with denigrating aspiring actresses drawn into a world where he considered them “complete disposables,” a prosecutor said on Friday in closing arguments at his New York City rape trial.

“The universe is run by me and they don’t get to complain when they get stepped on, spit on, demoralized and, yes, raped and abused by me — the king,” Joan Illuzzi-Orbon said, mimicking Weinstein.

Using a TV monitor next to the jury box, the prosecutors displayed photos of “Sopranos” actress Annabella Sciorra and five other accusers who also testified. Illuzzi told jurors that aside from the more successful Sciorra, the others were “complete disposables. They were never going to be in his world.”

Illuzzi also showed a side-by-side comparison of Sciorra’s testimony about confronting Weinstein in the mid-1990s after he allegedly raped her and similar testimony by his rape accuser about how the mogul reacted when she told him she had a boyfriend in 2013.

“His eyes went black and I thought he was going to hit me right there,” Sciorra testified. With the click of a button, the rape accuser’s testimony popped up: “His eyes changed and he was not there. They were very black and he ripped me up.”

Illuzzi’s closing comes a day after the defense offered an epic, hourslong closing argument painting the prosecution’s case as a “sinister tale” and the allegations as “regret renamed as rape.”

…

The prosecution’s task has been complicated because the women he’s charged with assaulting didn’t abandon Weinstein after the alleged encounters.

In her closing argument Thursday, Weinstein lawyer Donna Rotunno accused prosecutors of creating an alternate universe that “strips adult women of common sense, autonomy, and responsibility.”

“In this script the powerful man is the villain and he’s so unattractive and large, that no woman would ever want to sleep with him voluntarily. Regret does not exist in this world, only regret renamed as rape.” Rotunno said in remarks that went on for more than 4½ hours.

Yes.

That’s pretty much what I would have said.

“Ladies and gentleman of the jury, my client is a fat, dirty, greasy, stinking slob. He is Jewish. His face looks like a monstrous bridge troll. And as you have seen, he has a penis that looks like a vagina and no testicles. No one in their right mind would want to have sex with him – except those wanting access to his power, which this woman admits that she sought, and continued to seek, even after she claims he raped her.”

This case is so clear cut, that it is damning to our society that it ever went to trial. If he actually gets convicted, then you might as well just all cut your dicks off now, because any man who has sex with a woman will be effectively guilty of rape, years later, under whatever circumstances.

Sure, Harvey would only be convicted because he is so disgusting, but his disgustingness is legally irrelevant. The legal relevance of this case is this:

• A woman was in a sexual relationship with a man; all parties agreed that the sex was consensual
• She continued to have sex with him over a period of years
• According to her, several years into that relationship, he raped her, though she has no evidence other than her word
• After the rape, according to all parties, she continued to have a close relationship with him, including continuing to have sex with him and sending him flattering emails

So yes: any woman you’ve ever had sex with can come and accuse you of secretly raping her years ago. And if Harvey gets convicted, then anyone can be convicted.

This effectively makes you the slave of any woman you are sexually involved with, as she can at any time issue the credible threat that she will get you thrown in prison for rape if you do not do what she wants you to do.

The saddest fact is: even if Harvey gets off, a case like this is bound to get a conviction at some time in the near future, because the new philosophy of our society is that men are simply evil and should be punished for existing. Then a few years after the first conviction, this will become standard.

We should have made our stand with Saint Brock the Martyr.

We have to ask: at which point is it no longer worth it?

At what point will we simply give up on women altogether, rather than continue to be subjected to this abuse?

I wrote about this when it first broke in the news.

I still think it’s a hoax.

A 12-year-old boy getting in a fight on the playground – even assuming this is real – getting this much attention in international media is completely insane, is it not?

JTA:

The Jewish boy who was forced to kneel and kiss the shoes of a Muslim classmate has been sent threatening text messages.

The messages were sent Friday after photos of the incident were splashed across the front pages of newspapers in Australia and around the world, the Daily Mail reported. The photo was first published by the Australian Jewish News.

The messages told the 12-year-old boy that he would be slaughtered and asked if he wanted to “talk about suicide,” according to the report.

Victoria Police confirmed to the Daily Mail Australia that they were investigating a report of such text messages but would not comment further.

Dvir Abramovich, chairman of B’nai B’rith’s Anti-Defamation Commission, called the threats “vile and deplorable.” He said the boy’s parents now want a broader inquiry into anti-Semitism in schools.

Abramovich has helped the family to relocate the boy from Cheltenham Secondary College in suburban Melbourne to a Jewish school.

If it was a white boy accusing a Moslem of forcing him to kiss his feet, then – well, if that were the case, the school probably would have told him to shut up, and the media certainly never would have reported it.

But assuming in some alternate reality it did happen that a white boy got into the media saying that a Moslem made him kiss his feet, then you would have all of these various Islamic groups jumping into action to attack the accuser and say the Moslem boy did nothing wrong.

But of course, when it is a Jew accusing a Moslem, the Moslem advocacy groups stay silent.

For the hajis know who butters their falafel, and on which side.

Regular readers will remember the story of the judge that was attacked for setting up a trust that only paid out to his kids if they are in a heterosexual marriage with someone of the same race.

Well, that judge, Vic Cunningham, who scandalized the Jewish media when it was found that he had normal desires for his family, tried the case of a Jew in 2003. And the judge’s alleged racism is being used to claim that he was also an anti-Semite and so the case should be retried.

JTA:

A Jewish death row inmate in Texas who says his judge was anti-Semitic has appealed to the Supreme Court.

Randy Halprin is set to be executed on Oct. 10. He was part of the “Texas 7” group of prisoners who escaped from a prison in the state in 2000 and were convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of a police officer who responded to a robbery they committed. Four of them have already been executed.

And one committed suicide. The seventh is going to be executed in November of this year.

In May, Halprin said in an appeal that the judge who sentenced him in 2003, Vickers Cunningham, referred to him using anti-Semitic slurs, including “f****n’ Jew” and “g*****n k**e.” The court denied his appeal last month.

Does he also claim that those are inaccurate descriptors?

Seems like a hard sell.

“Halprin fails to present any evidence in his motion showing that Cunningham’s bias against him would establish by clear and convincing evidence that, absent such bias, no reasonable factfinder would have found Halprin guilty of the underlying offense,” the court’s ruling reads.

On Thursday, Halprin appealed to the Supreme Court.

…

A number of Jewish groups, including  the American Jewish Committee, Union for Reform Judaism and the Anti-Defamation League, expressed support for Halprin’s original appeal. The appeal followed a report the previous year in The Dallas Morning News that Cunningham set up a trust in 2010 to give his children money if they marry a white Christian of the opposite sex.

So there is no evidence that the judge was an anti-Semite. There is just the claim of a Jew murderer that he was called mean names.

The entire thing hinges on the story of the racist trust.

In all likelihood, the judge wasn’t an anti-Semite. Most good old boy types in Texas, who would want their daughters marrying white men, think Jews are God’s chosen people, because that’s what Jew-bought televangelists have been saying for fifty years.

But even if he did hate Jews, the idea that he was calling the Jew a “goddamn kike” right in the court room, to the Jew’s face, is so stupid it’s almost unfathomable that someone could have the nerve to make such a claim.

But look at his cousins over at the ACLU circling the wagons.

They don’t even say “allegedly anti-Semitic judge.” They just report it as if the words of the Jew cop-killer are unquestionable truths, as if this is the Nuremberg trials or something.

But you know that any court case that involves both goy and Jew is the Nuremberg trials all over again for these bloodsucking rats.

I’m Sure You’re Wondering…

All of the many, many articles discussing the grave anti-Semitic injustice to this man talk about his prison break and the cop he killed, but they don’t tell you what he was in prison for in the first place. Universally, these articles are skipping that detail.

You have to go pretty far back to find it. But I found it.

D Magazine:

To pay his rent, Randy would babysit the 18-month-old son of one of his roommates. One night the child was found severely beaten, suffering two broken legs, two broken arms, and a skull fracture. Under police questioning, Randy at first suggested the child’s mother was to blame. He said she was always going out and getting “messed up” and neglecting her toddler.

He stuck with that story until he flunked a polygraph. When he broke down and confessed, he described how he’d beaten and kicked the child when the child wouldn’t stop crying. He even imitated the high-pitched voice the toddler used as he called for his mother. “He was mocking him,” Fort Worth police detective Renee Kamper testified years later. “I’ll probably never forget it.” There were also wounds on the child’s tongue that a doctor testified were consistent with burns from a match or cigarette.

…

Facing the prospect of an even longer sentence from jurors not likely to sympathize with a child abuser, Randy pleaded guilty to felony injury to a child in return for a 30-year prison term.

I wonder if that was a white toddler he tortured?

Actually, I don’t wonder. Of course it was.

Definitely not the most sympathetic of Jews.

But the ADL has certainly gone to bat for unsympathetic Jews before.

In fact, the ADL was founded to defend a Jew who raped and murdered a 13-year-old white girl and blamed it on black people.

Jewish people are literal demonic monsters and they should all be on death row.

End of.

Click this to enlarge it.

I had never seen all these Tweets together like that.

I’m not accusing this Jew of being a homosexual pedophile. That is libel.

I am simply saying that I just don’t see why he would make these tweets if he was not a homosexual pedophile.

Clearly, this is something that is on his mind a lot, and he seems to have a desire to share it with other people, presumably those who pick up on such things rather than just random normies.

He also has the physiognomy of a homosexual pedophile.

But arguably, all Jews do, I suppose.

For the record, the Jew is married to a woman. They have two children.

However, Jewish homosexual pedophiles pretending to be straight white men is absolutely a thing. He would not be the first such person.

Is there an possible explanation for these tweets that I’m missing?

Is it a joke?

Like those jokes about pederasty and bestiality on Seth O’MacFarlane’s “Family Guy”?

That was like ten years ago, and I was always like “why are we making jokes about this? Is it to normalize it?”

Anyway, the Ian Black tweets don’t even seem to be comedy, and they are actually suggesting sex with boys as a positive thing – whereas O’Family Guy is at least making it out to be a bad thing.

And O’MacFarlane did call out Kevin Spacey on the show, before it came out that he is a pederast.

He also created a real Star Trek show to compete with this shitty thing that is being called Star Trek now.

Which I appreciate.

Siegmar Faust (on the right)

Siegmar Faust was a noted civil rights activist in the former East Germany. Monitored by the Stasi (East German secret police) for “subversive activities”, he spent years in Communist prisons. When he finally made it to West Germany, he must have assumed that he would now enjoy a lifestime of free speech. How wrong he was.

In recent years, Faust has been employed as a tour guide in the same Stasi prison in Saxony where he himself was once locked up.

He lost his job a few days ago after giving an interview to the Berliner Zeitung newspaper in which he suggested that the persecution of “Holocaust deniers” was excessive.

“I have no sympathy for *Horst Mahler”, said Faust. But he finds it “unbearable, what the justice system is doing” and in respect of the the six million Jews murdered by the National Socialists, he asks himself: “Is the number six million sacred?”

He understands, says Faust, “that the crimes of the Nazi period continue to have effects. But “you have to stop a bit some time. You shouldn’t overplay it.” Finally, the pensioner claims that in Hohenschönhausen there are “few people who think differently from him”.

Source

Well, Faust got the answer to his question right away when he lost his job. Apparently the number of 6 million is sacred. Not only those who question it must be persecuted, but anyone who even expresses sympathy for them. In its statement about the termination of his employment, the Stasi Victims’ Memorial Centre also cited Faust’s involvement with the AfD as being unacceptable.

There is tremendous irony in a man formerly persecuted for his free speech activism in East Germany now facing persecution for the same thing in “free” Germany. It will be interesting to see if Faust now campaigns publicly on the issue as he did before.

* Horst Mahler was a lawyer and far-left activist who spent many years in prison for crimes related to his involvement in the Baader-Meinhof gang in the 70s. When he was eventually released, he transitioned from the far-left to the far-right, resumed practising as a lawyer and defended the “far right” NPD party when the German state tried to shut it down.

He founded an organisation to defend “Holocaust deniers” but was subjected to constant legal harassment by the German state.

Mahler was ultimately banned from practising law on the basis of two statements he had made.

“There is rationality in the annihilation of the Jews”

“Billions would have been ready to forgive Hitler if he had only murdered the Jews”

Ultimately, Mahler was charged with Holocaust denial himself and sentenced to 6 years in prison. Further charges were brought against him when he was inside and the sentence was increased. He applied for asylum in Hungary but was rejected.

Mahler under arrest in Budapest after unsuccessfully applying for asylum in Hungary

Now in his 70s, and with an amputated leg, Horst Mahler is still in prison in Germany. Here is the powerful final statement he gave before returning to incarceration.

Despite what the title says, I don’t think even Wyatt would be so bold as to draw a Jew this exaggerated.

He goes on air while claiming to be White when it suits him to complain about the Christian privilege of not knowing about Yom Kippur from his position of studying gender, religious and faggot issues.

That face.

Wow.