Jews love to point at negroes who practice Judaism whenever someone presses them about their hate.

But how do Jews actually treat their black “co-religionists” when they want to visit the Wailing Wall?

Simple: they arrest them at the airport then deport them to a random African country!

Times of Israel:

A Kenyan Jewish leader who arrived in Israel on Monday night was denied entry into the country by the Interior Ministry and deported to Ethiopia.

The rejection by Israeli authorities of Yehudah Kimani — who had come to the Jewish state for a three-week study program — was seen by activists as part of the ongoing discrimination by Israel against Jews from emerging communities around the world.

…

But when Kimani arrived at Ben Gurion Airport late Monday night, officials at the passport check said his visa was not valid. Kimani was placed in a holding area and deported on the next flight to Ethiopia.

“They just told me to go back, I feel like I’m not even a human,” Kimani said from the Addis Ababa airport.

You’d think that with Jews being such a small humanitarian superpower pushing for unlimited African refugees in our countries, a whole nation of compassionate Jews would look like the “It’s a Small World” ride at Disney World?

Instead, when Jews have a state for and by Jews, they snatch invited negro guests right at the checkpoint, then force them to get on the first plane back to Africa!

Tikkun Olam! 

At the risk of sounding “intersectional,” notice how there are two groups Jews like to ‘deconstruct’: whites and Palestinians. If you have any question about whether Jews are preparing us for active genocide once our numbers are low enough, go look at the similarities in how they intellectually approach Western whites and Palestinians.

According to Jews Palestinians don’t exist. That semi-independent, relatively sophisticated and functional Arab state and society that existed before 1948 is a figment of your anti-Semitic imagination.

An Iranian author has decided to write an English language book about Palestine. There is nothing anti-Israel or anti-Zionist in the book, it is just a series of facts about Palestinian culture for kids.

Jews are sending her death threats and taking to their media demanding her scalp!

Jewish Week:

Huckleberry Finn” and the use of the “n” word. “Harry Potter” and the witchcraft charge. The mess over Harper Lee’s “Go Set a Watchman” and whether she ever intended it to see the light of day.

Publishing controversies bubble up every now and then, but the recent reaction to an ABC book — “P is for Palestine” — caught the owner of Book Culture on the Upper West Side by surprise. Jewish moms, according to a report in the New York Post, were livid, charging in Facebook posts that the book was anti-Semitism masquerading as an ABC book.

It’s not every day, after all, that people protest a children’s book. But when the subject matter is Palestine, all bets are off.

In the 20 years that Chris Doeblin has been running independent bookstores, he’s rarely had an experience like this: threats being called into the store. His shop received threats when it said it would carry Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses,” which was inspired by the prophet Mohammed. The book, which was published in 1988, led to the Iranian government slapping a fatwa on Rushdie. But that was decades ago, Doeblin told The Jewish Week.

The threatening calls and emails came after Book Culture announced

a reading with Goldbarg Bashi, author of the new children’s book, “P is for Palestine.” Most of the callers to the store took issue with one page in the alphabet book, in which the letter I stands for intifada. Intifada is the Arabic word for uprising and the word many associate with years of violence in Israel in the late 1980s and early 2000s.

The Middle Eastern-Swedish author and Pace University history professor’s book, with illustrations by Golrokh Nafisi, is being sold on Etsy and in select bookstores. The book was self-published with funds raised on LaunchGood.com.

Bashi wrote about the negative reaction to her book in a Facebook group for New York City moms. “Because of the serious level of threats aimed at me … I may need police security for my reading of a children’s ABC book. In New York City. In November 2017.”

The real issue Jews have with this book is:

1. It humanizes Palestinians, which is very bad for Zionist propaganda.
2. They are afraid Jewish children might read it, since it was featured in a bougie New York book club.
3. The author is Iranian, who Jews viscerally loath just for existing.

The author Golbarg Bashi is actually a bit of a liberal asshole. She works in academia, but kudos to her for being principled. Her husband (also Iranian) is an academic who has been accused of “anti-Semitism” many times.

This whole situation is rich seeing as Jews love to mock and condescend towards Gentiles who boycott anti-social content they create as “uptight,” unenlightened or bigoted.

For example, Vice has been promoting a “children’s book” written by a Jew about a queer black Santa. They have been repeatedly referencing an article I wrote about it a month ago, to try and mock me as a paranoid anti-Semite. Does this look appropriate for a little kid?

You’d think with all the fags being caught with their hands down little boys’ pants lately that they would lay low for a while…

Regardless, here we have Jews wanting to burn the only English language kid’s book about Palestine just because it doesn’t mention Israel.

It’s kikes who are the paranoid fanatics.

I don’t play video games much anymore, but even though Call of Duty: WWII is a story told from the American point of view, it looks like it might be an interesting historical experience.

But not everyone feels that way.

One Jew who played through the game has written an angry and unhinged rant about how it doesn’t include gas chambers and it shows a few (of millions) German soldiers as human beings. He furiously juxtaposes Call of Duty with the perverse sadism-infused J-left fantasy game Wolfenstein II (which has seen abysmal sales compared to COD: WWII).

It’s fitting that he makes this comparison. Call of Duty: WWII is a game attempting to tell a believable story based on real life events, so of course there is no mention of gas chambers. Maybe this Jew reads the term “historical fiction” literally? What Jews claim happened in World War II is a fantasy tale that can only be portrayed in a whimsical and transparently white-hating political universe like (((Robert Altman’s))) latest iteration of Wolfenstein.

The butt-hurt Jew Alex Kubas-Meyer at J-left astroturf site Daily Beast is literally shaking!

The Daily Beast:

Only in 2017 can a video game advertisement proclaiming, “Make America Nazi-Free Again” provoke controversy.

Only now could a new game from a decades-old series spark a backlash for the celebration of what it has always been: a Nazi murder simulator. World War II fell out of fashion as the setting for first-person shooters ever since Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare set its sights on the present day, and that was largely because it seemed like the Nazi-fighting thing was all played out. This was for the best, since Nazis in video games are generally just lazy shorthand for “bad guys.” You don’t need to develop your antagonists if they’re Nazis because everyone knows they’re evil. Eventually, players realized how uninteresting this was, and the Third Reich disappeared from the mainstream for about a decade. But then Nazis came back in the real world and have been pushing to make themselves mainstream, so it’s fitting that they are now, again, digital enemy No. 1.

Wolfenstein II and Call of Duty: WWII are the latest installments in storied franchises. Wolfenstein 3D popularized the first-person shooter genre, and Call of Duty has largely defined the genre as it exists today. Released within a week of each other, these games come saddled with political context that neither developer could have foreseen. I will admit that, while America is having conversations about whether it’s OK to punch a Nazi in the face, it’s nice to have new games that let me punch them in the face with bullets.

The two are about as different as first-person shooters can be. Call of Duty is historical fiction, more or less following actual battles across Europe; Wolfenstein takes place in an alternate 1960s where Nazis not only won World War II but have since taken over the United States. One documents a platoon of men who storm the beaches of Normandy, and the other follows a man who single-handedly brings a nuclear bomb into a Texan Nazi base and detonates it. Over the past few years, Call of Duty has gone in some crazy directions, culminating in last year’s space-set Infinite Warfare, and those games look more like Wolfenstein than they do this new back-to-basics Call of Duty. It’s a conflicting change, though, because while it was probably necessary to tone some of the craziness down, WWII goes too far in the other direction. In trying to hark back to the old days, the game arrives staid. And by featuring violence that feels sanitized compared to recent entries, WWII does little to portray the real evils of the Third Reich.

…

I imagine that the script of Call of Duty: WWII was written in a different time, one long before a white supremacist plowed his car into a crowd of protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, and before the president of the United States said there were “some very fine people on both sides” of that incident. I like to imagine that someone looked back on the script after Charlottesville and cringed when they remembered the line “They’re not all bad.” Your character says it after driving by a group of dead Nazis. Someone makes a joke, and you cut them off to give the dead Nazis some credit. Because… what? Why? Maybe there could be something interesting there, were someone daring enough to dig into it, but it’s just thrown out there, everyone sort of agrees, and then we get on with it. What a pull quote: “Nazis. They’re not all bad” —Call of Duty: WWII.

In Wolfenstein, on the other hand, the earliest moments feature the half-Jewish protagonist’s not-Jewish father attacking him for playing with an African-American girl. He is a monster. So are the Klansmen who openly and eagerly wear their hoods around the Nazi-occupied American towns. So is the Nazi official who kills someone trying to help you while you’re tied up, forces a gun into your mouth, and asks how the gunpowder that killed your friend tastes. In Wolfenstein, they are the same. No subtlety. No shades of gray. It’s so over-the-top that it stops being funny and starts being disturbing again. And that’s what it should be. It should be uncomfortable to watch awful things; to pretend that they don’t exist is worse.

So, we return to Call of Duty, which shies away each time it hints at the true horrors of Nazism. A mission titled “Death Factory” might lead one to believe that it takes place in a concentration camp but instead, it’s just a forest. I continued to hold out the slightest bit of hope that Robbins hadn’t misled us all. After hours of waiting, the liberation came. Here, I thought, it must be time. But alas, no. Over a digital map and a few small images, you hear the same bad voice-acting you’ve been dealing with all game: “I thought I knew what cruelty was.” That’s all he could come up with. In the epilogue, you do see a camp, but it’s deserted. It’s been set on fire. “They wanted to hide whatever happened here,” someone says. But “they” aren’t the Nazis; “they” are WWII’s developers. They chose to use a POW labor camp, where there are implications of atrocities aimed at soldiers, not civilians. They chose to depict a World War II without gas chambers.

So in case you didn’t realize it by now, Jews who make games like Wolfenstein II see the 1-dimensional “bad guys” as stand ins for you, me and any white person (including Trump Deplorables) who isn’t a tranny or a Shabbos-Goy (Jews will kill them last).

Jews fantasize about slowly torturing us to death and seek to get enough people in the real world used to the idea through stupid video games.

Remember, all of this hate sprouts purely from the fact that we reject what Jews have planned for us and want them to leave us alone. Jews believe it is their god-given right to exploit, rape, and kill us, and that an objection to this is a default on our right to live!

But Jews better watch out. Now that they are in power they refuse to even recognize that we’re human, much less that we have grievances that are both logical and morally sound. But can this power dynamic last forever? History is fluid.

Jews love to pretend they are unique victims of history, but if you don’t consider non-Jews to be human, why complain about the taste of your own medicine? Jews are a numerical speck that behaves like Darth Vader. But just because we Westerners restrain ourselves from showing you a mirror doesn’t mean our patience will last forever.

The Battle of Beersheba (1917) remains one of the finest moments in Australian military history. The British army was stuck in a typical World War I stalemate with the Turkish garrison, so they decided upon drastic action to break through the line.

Using only bayonets, the 4th Light Horse Brigade were commanded to mount a head on cavalry charge across an open field against Ottoman machine guns and artillery. The horsemen suffered casualties, but were able to reach and defeat the entrenched Turks. This attack allowed the British to take Beersheba and then Jerusalem.

Unfortunately for the fallen heroes, they were buried in what is now modern day Israel. Their tombs have crosses on them, which makes them a target for Jewish hate crimes.

Times of Israel:

Three Jewish youths were arrested on Saturday after they were caught vandalizing the Beersheba War Cemetery in southern Israel, police said.

A passerby reported to police that the three — two minors aged 14 and 17, and another man aged 18 — were causing damage to tombstones in the graveyard, known locally as the Australian cemetery.

Police arrested the three, and took them to a nearby station for questioning. Pictures released by the police showed several headstones that had been toppled.

A police statement noted that the three suspects were Jewish, and that the cemetery served Christians, but did not indicate whether the incident was religiously motivated or not.

Notice the lack of the widely abused buzzword HATE.

Is this a hate crime?

What does it look like?

Will the Australian government condemn these Jews for on this cowardly attack? No, because Australia’s been sold!

Surely, the Australian “free press” will mention this? Not yet. I will be following this case and report if they don’t say something in the next 24 hours.

As for the three Jewish vandals, expect a slap on the wrist. When Jews kicked their own tombstones over in the USA it was an international scandal even Donald Trump was expected to address. Here we get a blurb in Israeli press.

What do you call a hyper-ethnocentric group that uses its money and power to aggressively promote interracial relationships for your people, then sends witch-hunters after you if you disagree?

Calling it ‘hypocrisy’ is technically accurate, but it doesn’t capture the actual intensity of their behavior, nor their aloof reaction in the face of such a charge. The English language is fairly limited, the only word we can use is JEW!

Jewish ethnosadism is encoded in their DNA and their “holy” books. Richard Cohen’s Southern Poverty Law Center lists Black Israelites and Christian Identity believers as “hate-groups” even though the only thing they do is follow the Old Testament and apply it to themselves. By that standard, all Jewish sects are hate groups, but the SPLC gets the last say on what constitutes “hate”! 

Now a Rabbi has been purged from the Rabbinical Assembly. His crime? Officiating an interracial marriage.

Forward:

In her article “A Wedding Invitation Like No Other,” Jane Eisner describes “intermarriage” as the “oozing story” among Conservative Jews, a story “found just below the surface.”

I am one of the rabbis she describes as “not so quietly defying the restriction against officiating” at a marriage ceremony involving a Jewish person and a non-Jew. And I would like to assert that this is not a story “oozing below the surface.” It is one of the most consequential issues about the future of Conservative Judaism, and liberal Judaism in America, and everyone knows it. The Rabbinical Assembly (RA) is terrified by it. At its most recent convention, attendees were sworn to secrecy, adjured not to reveal what was said at a closed-door session on the topic. And now a “Blue Ribbon” commission has been empaneled, one whose members were chosen in secrecy.

…

To begin, we need to find a substitute for the term “intermarriage.” It is offensive to many couples. It resonates with the intimation of miscegenation. Their union is not an aberration. It is simply a marriage. The couple who is marrying often does not have a clear sense of what their future, or future home will be. And even if they do, there are no guarantees that life will play out as they plan it. The future is a moving target at best.

What they want from an officiant is affirmation, as they publicly initiate their journey as a married couple, that their love is valid and that their commitment to each other is firm and respected by the community. The fact that they want a rabbi to be that officiant, or one of their officiants, indicates that they envisage Judaism and Jewish identity to be a part of their family’s identity. How much more could we expect of any couple, even if both parties are Jewish? We should feel honored that they want us to be part of their momentous occasion; not put-upon. We should embrace them with love and affirmation, not make demands upon them that they cannot possibly commit to, and act as if we are grudgingly doing them a favor.

In Judaism there is an Orthodox sect (considered the strictest), a Conservative (Centrist) element, and then there are the Reformed (“liberal” Jews) who happily eat pork and do whatever else they want. The Rabbinical Assembly is part of the Conservative movement, so not even radical within Jewry, yet here we see how strict they are about race-mixing. They operate in both the United States and Canada, under full tax exemption for themselves and their congregations, yet are clearly in a legal gray area when it comes to American civil rights laws.

But that doesn’t matter. Jews make the rules and don’t follow them. The New York Times won’t talk about it like they would a Christian church doing the same.

Now of course, there are interracial couples in the American Jewish community, but they are rarely accepted and are the equivalent of “honorary Aryans” in the Third Reich. Jews will officiate certain marriages, like Ivanka Trump with Jared Kushner, because of the political and economic benefits it will reap their community.

With that said, Jewish clergy as a whole finds race-mixing to be unacceptable.

While most people know the Orthodox position, which is to fellate babies and kill all Goyim, liberal Jews oppose intermarriage as well.

Something you won’t ever see promoted by the SPLC or the ADL

The Central Conference of American Rabbis, which oversees practices for “Liberal” Jews, unambiguously discourages Rabbis from blessing mixed marriages. The reason they are considered “open minded” and “progressive” is they don’t blacklist Rabbis who choose to marry a Jew with a Gentile. How enlightened!

Some Jews outside of Israel marry people of European or Asian descent for pragmatic reasons. But when the spouse in question is a Negro, Jews may use it to make political alliances with blacks against whites but it is considered especially wrong. Little do the “black Jew” converts know that their marriages and conversions are a sham. When they try to go to the “holy land,” the Israeli government detains them at the airport and deports them!

Before racial science was established, anti-miscegenation laws in the West were based on Old Testament principles. Jews call this hate, but it’s innocent “defense” of their identity when they do it. Alan Dershowitz – a famously “liberal” Jew – wrote a whole book about it.

This behavior is so complex and psychologically disturbed it isn’t even just sociopathic. That is why you can call a Jew a psychopath, a liar, a hypocrite or a murderer and he just shrugs it off or addresses it as a PR problem. But call him a Jew and then you will witness him writhe in rage and discomfort – the mask comes off!

[Editor’s Note: Eric Striker just made an epic point here: Jews classify both Christian Identity and Black Israelite groups as “hate groups,” because they take the same holy books the Jews use and apply them to themselves. Having been close with a lot of pre-Alt-Right WN guys, I can tell you that the entire belief system of Christian Identity is based on the Old Testament being about whites, and I understand that Black Israelites believe the same thing. Sooooo – by this logic, the third group using the Old Testament – the Jews – would themselves have to be a hate group! Pointing out the double-standards of Jews is so boring, because it is just so obvious. Sometimes I feel like this job that I do is like if I had to go around every day, all day and tell people that the Sun is bright – and then be accused of being pure evil and be hunted down, be defamed across the planet, have local newspapers organizing protests against my father, reporters hunting my mother, have all of my money shut off, etc. etc. etc. – for stating something that is a self-evident fact! That is sometimes what I feel like. -AA]

“Hello, my fellow white people. We should exterminate ourselves.”

Two years ago a (((“fellow white”))) named Ali Michael wrote an article talking about how it is wrong for white people to reproduce, and if they did have kids, to ensure the child is of another race so as not to propagate racism, privilege and oppression.

Later on it was found out that Ali Michael is a Jew, married to a Rabbi, and mother to multiple biological children. This was curiously omitted!

One Twitter user, Wagner Clemente Soto, has compiled countless everyday Jews pulling this charade on social media. This whole “I’m a white person, and I’m guilty! Please murder and disenfranchise people who look like me, Jamal and Paco!” theater is extremely common, almost scripted (always with “my fellow white people”). Then when some non-white takes them up on their offer, they say, “oh no you got it wrong, I’m not white, I’m Jewish.”

Whenever you see someone who is violently anti-white on the street or online, always press them on whether they’re Jewish.

If they aren’t just some kind of sexual deviant or unmarried fat woman, you’ll hit a hole-in-one. They’ll shrink in terror before your eyes: “DA GOYIM KNOW!” If you have a “black twitter” account, use that to ask, because they might be cagey about exposing themselves to the people they’re trying to kill.

It’s not hard to see how people across time periods and cultures have accused Jews of being involved in massive and nefarious conspiracies. Is there a group of people coordinating this from a nerve center, or are Jews just born and raised to hate? Probably a little bit of both, masquerading their Jewish hate councils as civil rights groups and universalist philanthropic endeavors.

Here is the Twitter user’s post, I will reproduce some of these here because it’s a matter of time before the ADL/SPLC cyber-NKVD takes them offline.

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:


AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

A cuckservative would argue that these Jews are actually just “white liberals,” and feeling “guilty” is just more common in the Jewish psyche.

But is that true? How would these people react if you called them out as Jews, and said the Jews are collectively guilty for countless crimes?

Well, that would be beyond the pale. Beyond reason. That would be HATE!

But against whites, the most targeted group for interracial crime (not always registered as hate crimes, because you can’t be racist against whites), these people add fuel to the fire, they stir the pot and rattle the monkey cages to tragic ends.

It’s time we draw these kikes out into open battle. They will do whatever they can in their power to avoid it because we’re numerically larger and they know they will lose. Always call a Jew by his given Rosenblatt, and not his legal “Jones.”

Just like Robert De Niro is an oil-drilling pansy who plays a bad ass in movies, Jews are a race filled with almost otherworldly genocidal bloodlust playing a “fellow white” overcome with guilt at a media center or university near you.

They try to meme whites out of existence, but what happens if you show a vampire his reflection?

A 501(c)(3) tax-exempt Jewish “cultural” organization called The New Inquiry hosted a film festival Saturday night in Brooklyn, intended to celebrate and encourage left-wing political violence against nationalist dissidents for the crime of engaging in the civil right to free speech. TNI was founded by Mary Borkowski, ((( Jennifer Bernstein))) and (((Rachel Rosenfelt))) as a Freudo-Marxian organization, enjoying praise and positive portrayal from New York City elites.

Once again, Jews and almost nothing but the Jews are blatantly calling on people to physically assault Richard Spencer and celebrating terrorism as a means to a valid political response when you don’t get the election result you wanted. Spencer has always tried to keep some (rapidly dwindling, hopefully) distance between himself and “anti-Semitism,” but world Jewry’s problem with the Alt-Right is not with our ideas, it’s an impersonal and strategic hatred of our entire race.  

No matter how diplomatic, civil or ethical you are, if you stand for Occidental self-defense and nationalism, power-Zionists and their slobbering barking Mastiffs will mark you for death, then host a film festival dedicated to furthering this endeavor.

Gothamist:

It’s been a tough few months for anyone who doesn’t consider themselves politically-aligned somewhere to the left of say, Bull Connor. However, in the darkness, there’s been one spark of light and hope: that video of “white nationalist” Richard Spencer getting punched in his face. And if you want to wring all the spiritual uplift you can out of that moment in American history, I’ve got great news for you: there’s a free film festival in Brooklyn this weekend devoted solely to watching clips of Nazis getting popped.

Fash Bash: A Night of Punching Nazis on Film is the film festival of your dreams, provided you’ve had at least one dream somewhat recently that involved a Nazi getting punched.

…

Ava Kofman, one of the organizers of the night and an editor at The New Inquiry, told Gothamist in an email that “Fash Bash Bash is a film screening of clips from movies in which people are resisting and protesting fascism.

Some Jews in national publications offered a tepid condemnation of the sucker punch on Richard Spencer, but that is only a ruse to create a racial alibi. For example, Chuck Johnson was able to get the names of the 231 Antifa terrorists who were caught rioting and attacking random pedestrians during the Trump inauguration, and Jews are estimated to be between 1/5 and 1/4 of the people arrested – that estimate doesn’t even account for half-Jews and fake surnames!

Any Jew that posits wishy-washy condemnations of terrorism without addressing the 1,000% over-representation of their community in the ranks of the NGO financed masked crusaders is merely the above-ground wing of such groups.

On one level, we should welcome this zero-sum escalation by the Judeo-Left. The flaw of every conservative is the assumption of innocent intentions and a reciprocal social contract in political exchanges with Jews and Leftists, which the latter don’t recognize at all. When conservative forces are so weak and discredited that they can no longer restrain the national revolutionary third option, that is when real Nazis start punching back.

Popular support from the masses for the Left is an all time low, and while the corporate backers of such ideologies such as Reddit will crack down on r/AltRight while leaving r/FullCommunism, being placed on the featured shelf just isn’t enough to make-up for their crappy and bourgeois ideas.

Just like in Spain, just like in the Weimar Republic, just like the 1920s that led to the 1930s, Jews/Leftists are biting off way more than they can chew.

Following the election of President Barack Obama in 2008, the whole alphabet soup of federal agencies swooped down on two very young white men who joked among themselves about assassinating Obama while wearing top hats and tuxedos. The investigation into the matter concluded that neither had taken serious steps towards realizing the plot, and that the “threats” were clearly just a joke.

Nevertheless, the two were brought up on stacked federal charges. After an aggressive campaign by the Judenpresse to portray both as “white supremacists,” they were indicted by an almost entirely black/non-white jury in a kangaroo court, and their lives were ruined with pled down federal prison sentences of 10 and 14 years respectively (going to trial would’ve risked up to 75 years!)

Fast forward 8 years, and all types of famous and powerful people are openly encouraging people to assassinate President Donald J. Trump. So far, legal consequences on par with the aforementioned have not been dished out against these malcontents, largely because in a plutocracy like the United States, the President is not as powerful as the hostile cabal behind the curtain destroying America.

Jews, who historically have championed murder and terrorism as an appropriate way to salvage a lost debate, have been on the front lines of this. Now the Jew Ted Kornblum, CEO of the guitar amplifier company Magnatone, has come out to publicly hint at a possible Jewish assassination conspiracy.

This sort of inflammatory material is part of a larger trend emerging from the presses and high pitched vocal chords of American Jewry. Last summer, the Jew Jesse Benn, famous for his call for blacks to assault any white they see on the street, wrote in the Huffington Post that violence must be employed against both Donald Trump and the Americans who elected him.

The merchants of poopy-peepee jokes at South Park, Trey Parker and (((Matt Stone))), alleged “conservatives” (due to their support for the Iraq war that took the form of demonizing Saddam Hussein), portrayed a stand-in for Trump being raped and murdered on the show last season.

There are way too many high profile Jews and degenerates out there calling for killing the President and political violence to list here. It’s not outlandish to assert that, yes, there are probably many groups of people actively plotting to try and assassinate Donald Trump, perhaps even with the knowledge of certain factions within the American government.

But they do not understand the power of destiny. Trump is destined to rule, the world is destined to change. A shot taken at him will miss, but it will trigger numerous consequences for the classes of people engaging in this behavior.

The Secret Service and FBI must be pressured to investigate Jews like Ted Kornblum.