This photograph looks like neo-Nazi propaganda, a photoshopped meme doing the rounds on Alt Right Twitter perhaps: the crazed, fanatic Jew orchestrating the fury of the brown horde against the western world and everything it stands for.

But the image is real. The Jew was Sidney Rittenberg. Here we see him holding up Mao’s Little Red Book in the midst of the “Cultural Revolution,” the part of Chink Communist history when they went full crazy.

Rittenberg has just died now, too, back in America, having become rich acting as a consultant for American blue chips wanting to do business in China, a living embodiment of the anti-Semitic trope of the Jew who plays both sides, ultimate Communist and ultimate capitalist.

The New York Times obit somehow manages to leave out the fact that Rittenberg was a Jew. The Washington Post at least deigns to mention it.

New York Times:

Sidney Rittenberg Jr. was born in Charleston on Aug. 14, 1921, to a Jewish family steeped in politics. His paternal grandfather emigrated from Lithuania and served five terms in the state House of Representatives. Mr. Rittenberg’s father was president of the Charleston City Council.

He attributed his activist leanings to having witnessed police officers brutalizing a black man who had been seeking protection from a drunken and abusive white man. “I asked my aunt about it,” he told People magazine. “I told her, ‘It’s so unjust!’ She said, ‘There isn’t any justice. You get what you pay for.’ ”

Many anti-Semitic tropes are confirmed by Rittenberg’s life story, one being the ability of Jews to worm their way into positions of influence in even the most adverse situations. China was a country with almost no Jews, yet somehow a Jew got into the inner sanctum.

For most of his time in China, from 1945 to 1980, he was an intimate of the Communist Party’s top leaders, whom he sought out in their mountain sanctuary, a guerrilla camp in Yan’an, by trekking 45 days on foot. He played gin rummy and argued dogma with Mao, talked for days about the United States and philosophy with Zhou, danced with Mao’s wife Jiang Qing, and got to know Mao’s inner circle, including Liu Shaoqi, the third-ranking leader. They all watched Laurel and Hardy movies together.

Another confirmed trope was that Jews control the media. Even in a Judenfrei country, this Jew ended up deciding what Chinks got to read and hear.

After Mao’s seizure of power in 1949 over the corrupt U.S.-backed Nationalist Party, which enjoyed little support among the population, Mr. Rittenberg was rewarded with appointments at Chinese news and propaganda agencies.

The trope of the pitiless Jew was also confirmed.

Mr. Rittenberg was an avid propagandist during Mao’s Great Leap Forward, a campaign from 1958 to 1961 to transform China from an agrarian economy to a collectivized, industrialized society. The campaign, which banned private farming and enforced edicts with indoctrination and forced labor, was a disaster, causing widespread famine and tens of millions of deaths.

He was even more directly involved in the early stages of Mao’s Cultural Revolution, a decade-long purge of “bourgeois” intellectuals, party officials and others suspected of anti-Maoist thought. Starting in 1966, thousands of young Red Guards persecuted millions with imprisonment, torture, public humiliation and property seizures in struggles to create a Maoist cult of personality.

Mr. Rittenberg joined the Red Guards in denouncing what they called “establishment” bureaucrats and haranguing the masses. His speeches and news conferences were published in the Red Guard newspapers. One famous picture from the era shows Mao autographing Mr. Rittenberg’s copy of his “Little Red Book” of sayings. Another shows Mr. Rittenberg on a speaker’s platform, holding the book up and exhorting crowds in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square to defend Mao’s thoughts.

…

A stalwart supporter of the regime, he believed that a little violence was inevitable in a revolution, even one ostensibly devoted to peace and equality. “A revolution is not like inviting guests to dinner,” he said in “The Revolutionary,” a 2012 documentary about his life, paraphrasing Mao. “It can’t be that civilized, that courteous, that gracious, that gentle.”

And the trope of the Jew as traitor, a traitor to America, of course, perhaps a traitor to the Chinks too?

Despite his growing status, Mr. Rittenberg was incarcerated twice on trumped-up charges. After the Communists took power in China, the Soviet leader Josef Stalin charged in a communiqué to Mao that Mr. Rittenberg was a secret American agent sent to undermine the revolution. Without trial, he was held for six years in solitary confinement.

Cleared of the bogus spy charges and released in 1955, he resumed his status in privileged upper echelons of the party. He was named to a high post in China’s Broadcast Administration, and later became a director of Radio Beijing, which regularly denounced the United States.

Having served as cheerleader for the extermination of tens of millions of people, Rittenberg then returned to America and slipped seamlessly into the lifestyle of a rich capitalist.

He founded Rittenberg & Associates, a consulting firm for American companies doing business in China.

…

Over the years, his services were engaged by hundreds of venture capitalists and American companies, including Microsoft, Intel, Prudential Insurance, Polaroid and Levi Strauss. He made a half-dozen business trips to China annually, and kept an apartment in Beijing.

“He may have been a card-carrying Communist, but he’s also very much a capitalist,” David Shrigley, a former Intel executive, told The Times in 2004.

He was welcomed back and feted by the media and big business. Scarcely a word of reproach was offered. Think about that. Imagine someone had performed comparable services for Hitler, serving as advisor and propagandist. Do you think he would have been allowed to return to a normal life? Do you think he would ever have been allowed to forget the “Six Million”? But Jewish Privilege means never being held to account.

After ticking off just about every anti-Semitic trope in the canon of anti-Semitic tropes, the old Jew had nothing left to accomplish and died.

Last spring, about a dozen members of the domestic terrorist group “Jewish Defense League” jumped a Palestinian protesting the AIPAC convention in Washington DC. The evidence was so overwhelming that one of them just got indicted.

The question that comes up is: “where was Antifa?”

DC Antifa organizer Lacy MacAuley insists that her PC paramilitary protests AIPAC all the time. The only proof she provides is “google it yourself,” which doesn’t turn anything substantial up.

I have protested at #AIPAC conferences, and some friends organize those protests. Before you say "why don't you protest x?" #DoYourResearch

— Lacy MacAuley (@lacymacauley) August 5, 2017

As we can see in the footage above, the black-clad “militant” anarcucks waving improvised weapons – the ones that show-up whenever white people protest the war in Syria or march for Kate Steinle – are nowhere in sight.

The Forward:

A Canadian member of the Jewish Defense League was indicted by a grand jury in last week in Washington, D.C., for charges that include the assault on a Palestinian-American at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference in March.

Yosef Steynovitz faces three assault-related charges, the Canadian Jewish News reported, including attacking a man with a dangerous weapon and beating Kamal Nayfeh, a 55-year-old community college teacher who was reportedly walking to the conference when the attack happened. A photo of the bruised and bloodied face of Nayfeh circulated widely after the incident. At the time, JDL leader Meir Weinstein claimed videos and photos of the incident were incomplete and said his group was acting in self defense.

One of Steynovitz’s charges includes a hate crime enhancement for anti-Arab bias that would lead to a greater penalty if Steynovitz is convicted, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported.

This is rich, as the main justification for Antifas reactionary behavior is that white people will victimize “people of color” and queers if allowed to have some suit and tie conference in the Ronald Reagan building.

Yet at AIPAC, they don’t seem to be doing anything about a conference that exists specifically to keep earmarking billions of American taxpayer dollars for bombs and bullets that ethnically cleanse and murder Palestinian children.

When Arabs go to protest this, the Jewish Defense League assaults them while calling them racial slurs.

Now predictably, the average Antifa asshole would come up with an excuse like “we can’t be everywhere at once!”

Do you see any of the Antifas doxing JDL members? Do they get them fired from their jobs? Do they dox the people financing and leading Israel lobbies like AIPAC, the ADL or any of the scores of groups of this sort? No, because they mostly agree with these kikes.

The JDL and Antifa overlap a lot and have a similar philosophy. When the JDL was stronger in the 80s and 90s, Antifa/SHARP and JDL even had overlapping membership and the same goals (attacking David Irving and Ernst Zundel, fighting pro-white activists led by Tom Metzger, etc.).

They are predicated on the same Jewish criminal psychology and strategy: if you can’t win an intellectual debate because you’re wrong, physically assault the person who is right until he recants or is dead. When they refuse to let you do that, then play the victim.

Most people know that “Antifa” groups are anti-white and not “anti-racist.” Jewish racism and supremacy is allowed because a disproportionate number of Antifa organizers are Jews using the tactic (consciously or subconsciously) as a way to silence critics of Jews and Zionism.

If that’s the game they want to play, fine. My issue is these people are liars misrepresenting what they do.

Just admit you are a group that exists specifically to protect Jewish power and prevent white people from having a voice.

Drop the bandanna of “anti-racism” and show your real face to the world!

Not even a real communist.

It’s a pretty widely understood fact that Jews are going to Jew you over. However, some people imagine that communist Jews will Jew you over less, or perhaps in a different manner than Hollywood Jews, Jewish bankers, Jewish feminists, Jewish pornographers, Israeli Jew terrorists and so on.

Alas, ye goyim.

‘Tis not so.

CBS News:

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and his wife, Jane Sanders have hired prominent defense attorneys amid an FBI investigation into a loan Jane Sanders obtained to expand Burlington College while she was its president, CBS News confirms.

Politico Magazine first reported the Sanders had hired lawyers to defend them in the probe. Sanders’ top adviser Jeff Weaver told CBS News the couple has sought legal protection over federal agents’ allegations from a January 2016 complaint accusing then-President of Burlington College, Ms. Sanders, of distorting donor levels in a 2010 loan application for $10 million from People’s United Bank to purchase 33 acres of land for the institution.

According to Politico, prosecutors might also be looking into allegations that Sen. Sanders’ office inappropriately urged the bank to approve the loan.

Burlington attorney and Sanders supporter Rich Cassidy has reportedly been hired to represent Sen. Sanders. And high-profile Washington defense attorney Larry Robbins, who counseled I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, is protecting Jane Sanders.

Ms. Sanders’ push for the liberal arts college’s costly land acquisition was cited in a press release by the college when it shut down in 2016.

Brady Toensing of Burlington, the man responsible for the claims filed to the U.S. attorney for Vermont, was a chairman for the Trump campaign in his state.

“I filed a request for an investigation in January 2016 and an investigation appears to have been started right away,” he said in an email to CBS News. “It was started under President Obama, his Attorney General, and his U.S. Attorney, all of whom are Democrats.”

“My only hope is for a fair, impartial, and thorough investigation,” Toensing added.

Weaver told CBS News that Toensing’s claim that Sen. Sanders used his influence to lobby for the loan is a “political charge” that is “baseless” and “false.”

And as for the claim that Ms. Sanders manipulated the loan application, Weaver said, “The loan was approved by the financial board at the college.”

Bernie was basically a total fraud.

You know, even I was fooled. Because I was like, it’s possible for a Jew to genuinely believe in this communist stuff, because it does ultimately destroy a society, even if certain aspects of it make sense.

And when he was first campaigning, he actually said that mass nonwhite immigration is a way for big business to drive down wages, and that it was corporations who had played the biggest role in mass immigration. This was a part of his platform.

Of course, he had to switch that up after he was pounced on as a skin-hater. But the fact he said it at all made me think he could have been a true believer.

Like, for example, Corbyn is an honest true believer in communism.

Though the difference is, he isn’t Jewish.

The tell that Bernie wasn’t really a true believer was that he wouldn’t condemn Israel to support the Palestinians, which is a hard left position that pretty much all hard-leftists have, even a lot of communist Jews. Basically, this is because they view Jews as white people oppressing brown people.

That was the tell.

Then, he endorsed Hillary Clinton, and was attacked by all of his own supporters. After that, I think most people realized he was a fraud. Even his most diehard people (except the women, I would assume).

The difficult fact of the matter is that on trade and war – which were key elements of the Sanders platform – Trump was a whole lot closer to Sanders than Hillary. Of course, no one expected him to endorse Trump, but I think a lot of people did expect him not to endorse Hillary.

Sucks for all those people that got tattoos of his face.

There is a lesson here: if you’re going to get a person’s face tattooed on you, you should wait until they’re dead.

Honestly, tattoos have become really trendy and absurd at this point. My advice to young people is: don’t get any tattoos at all.

If you want to get a nationalist tattoo, just get it on your chest. That way you get reminded of it every morning in the mirror, but no one else sees it unless you’re at the beach or wearing a think white shirt.

Bernie on the Brand

As I’m writing about Bernie Sanders – which isn’t something that comes up very often these days – I’ll note his recent comments on the Democratic brand.

He said it was probably worse than Trump’s.

I recently wrote about the branding problems the Democrats have right now, in relation to their attempting to oust Pelosi.

They are claiming that she – presumably along with Schumer – have created a bad brand.

But they have created the only brand that is possible, given their circumstances. Obviously, a lot of Bernie’s proposals would be popular – such as returning to a pre-Reagen system of taxes on corporations or an anti-WWIII platform – but are impossible because of their need for donors who would be opposed to such changes in the platform.

Along with this, all of Bernie’s supporters were white. Or I mean, 97+%. He had fewer colored supporters than Trump, that’s for sure – Trump at least got some older blacks who aren’t happy with Obama’s decision to remove police from black neighborhoods or his decision to stop putting crack dealers in prison, along with a few Mexicans who would prefer if American remain a majority white country because they came here because they didn’t want to live in Mexico.

Bernie though – I don’t know if you saw these rallies, but it was just all whites.

Utopian socialism is obviously Jewish, but it tends to only be white people who are interested in it.

The situation with Corbyn is a little bit different, as most of the nonwhites in the UK are Islamic, and Corbyn is anti-Israel.

But blacks and Latinos just have zero interest in the Bernie product.

In fact, blacks seemed to hate him even more than they hate Trump.

You notice that Black Lives Matter has pretty much disappeared since the election. And that isn’t for a lack of funding.

I recently read a long article about that on Buzzfeed, which said that they don’t have any direction and so they’re squabbling with one another. According to the reigning progressive dogma, they should be at war with Donald Trump – but they just aren’t. They appear to not care at all.

Though I don’t know why this is, I would assume it is because Trump is a masculine authority figure, and on a subconscious level, blacks just naturally respond to that. People have also suggested that they respect his swagger and the fact that he’s rich (he’s mentioned in over 100 rap songs), but that is sort of part of the same thing.

My point here is: The Democrats can’t change their platform. They have zero wiggle room. They have to be simply an opposition party, and hope to be able to oust Trump and get amnesty to the however many millions of illegal Latinos are in the country (no one knows the number, I personally believe it is between 25 and 35 million – the government has been claiming 11 million for like 20 years, but they admit they don’t actually know) so they can just have overwhelming numbers of people who will vote against whatever the white male option is.

It’s an incredibly easy nemesis for the GOP to defeat, but they are all bought and paid for, so they are as opposed to Trump as the Democrats themselves.

It’s a mess.

Other Thing

I predicted Hillary would have taken Bernie as her VP. I still think that was an obvious move.

I actually owed Jazzhands McFeels either $1000 when that didn’t happen, but we settled that with some other favor, I can’t remember what it was.

Do you guys think she would have won if she would have done that?