That fat Jew Jerry Nadler openly said this week that he supports the Ukraine attacking inside Russia, going so far as to say he would support the Ukies using US F-16s to strike Moscow.

So it’s not really speculation that powerful forces in the US establishment are encouraging attacks on Russia.

RT:

The US has been encouraging Ukraine to strike Russian territory, despite claiming the opposite, Russian Ambassador to Washington Anatoly Antonov said on Wednesday. 

Antonov argued that Washington’s statements in response to the recent drone raid on the Russian capital “sound like an encouragement for Ukrainian terrorists.”

“Doesn’t the [US] administration understand that no one believes their slogans about non-support of Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory?!” the diplomat said, according to a statement on the embassy’s Telegram channel.

Antonov’s remarks came after a White House spokesperson told reporters that “as [a] general matter, we do not support attacks inside of Russia.” The goal of the drone attack was to “sow fear among Russians” and undermine trust in the authorities, he said.

“The Russian Federation has been sentenced to ‘capital punishment’ in the [West] long ago. But simply, they don’t have it in them to achieve this goal,” the ambassador stated. 

Drones carrying explosives crashed into residential buildings in Moscow on Tuesday morning.

The UK – which, let’s be real, is just an extension of the US – actually celebrated the attacks.

RT:

In the aftermath of a drone attack on residential buildings in Moscow, UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly has said that Ukraine has a right to “project force” beyond its borders. Among Ukraine’s Western backers, Britain has led the charge to arm Kiev with long-range weaponry.

Speaking to reporters in Estonia on Tuesday, Cleverly said that Ukraine has a “legitimate right to defend itself,” and can “project force beyond its borders to undermine Russia’s ability to project force into Ukraine itself.”

Striking “legitimate military targets” within Russia is a viable self-defense tactic for Kiev’s forces, Cleverly added.

Yes.

And rando apartment buildings are a “legitimate military target” according to these people.

Because they are terrorists.

I mean, it would be one thing if they were actually hitting military targets.

But they don’t even claim that.

They are just attacking random people, and everyone knows that is what is happening.

It’s just unbelievable that we allow Jews to run our country. Why on earth would anyone think this was a good idea?

This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ. Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest. https://t.co/Uh95Uc1Ddo

— Rep. Nadler (@RepJerryNadler) November 19, 2021

Some people seem unaware that all of these people are Jews. Jerry Nadler is the most obvious Jew I’ve ever seen, so I don’t understand how people can not know that.

Calling for more charges against Kyle Rittenhouse is possibly the most Jewish thing ever. But this whole situation is the most Jewish thing ever. All of this stuff with the blacks. None of it even makes any sense. It’s all just gibberish.

Joe Biden isn’t Jewish – but he sure is a puppet of the Jews!

He claims – or rather, the written statement released with his name on it claims – that he’s very angry at the jury.

Written statement from President Biden on Rittenhouse verdict: pic.twitter.com/bz2EYhPFv7

— Philip Melanchthon Wegmann (@PhilipWegmann) November 19, 2021

What does that mean? That the alleged president is angry at the jury?

What is he going to do?

Is he going to bring new charges, as his Jewish masters are demanding?

Maybe!

God bless Infowars for doing something to spice up the impeachment hearings. This boring Jew Coup snooze fest has been dominating the headlines for days and there is literally nothing of any interest being said, but the goyim are being forced to watch it, regardless. It is a violation of human rights/several Geneva conventions.

How absolutely dare they?

Enter Owen Shroyer:

We all thank you for your service, Owen.

By the way, you don’t see Fox News going to bat for the President like this, do you? Trump should pay more attention to who his actual supporters are.

CBS News:

An Infowars host interrupted the opening minutes of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment hearing on Monday, accusing Chairman Jerry Nadler and other Democrats of committing “treason” while declaring President Trump innocent.

The protester, Owen Shroyer, began shouting just seconds after Nadler gaveled in the hearing and posted live video of the interruption to his Twitter feed.

“Jerry Nadler and the Democrat party are committing treason against this country, and you can kick me out, but he’s the one committing crimes. You are, Jerry Nadler,” Shroyer shouted. “You’re the one committing treason. America is done with this.” 

That’s right. Jerry “Dirty Jew Rat” Nadler got CALLED OUT!

“We voted for Donald Trump, and they’re simply removing him because they don’t like him,” he yelled, adding that Mr. Trump is “innocent.”

Shroyer continued filming as he spoke with officers outside the hearing room and told Capitol Police he was not violent.

“If you want a comment, I think it’s ironic I’m the one being hauled out of here when the Democrats are the ones committing the crimes,” he told police.

If you were going to do an impeachment hearing against the president, you should have at least put on a show! What you are pulling on the American people is unconscionable not only because it is a Jew Coup, but because it is simply unwatchable.

Impeach the man or don’t, but be done with it and let the news cycle move on already, Jews!

Many Jews believed to fuck small children are coming out and attacking Donald Trump for refusing to fire the man who helped their cousin and good friend Jeffrey Epstein get away with sex trafficking jailbait that was at least sexually developed.

Breitbart:

Tuesday on CNN’s “OutFront,” House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said President Donald Trump had a tolerance for “crooks” like Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta.

When asked about Trump standing by Acosta, Nadler said, “The president has a tolerance for crooks as long as they’re loyal to him.”

While discussing Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 plea deal, Nadler said, “Acosta perverted justice to give a very sweet deal to an accused multiple child molester and has no business in government.”

When you’re in a position where you’re effectively publicly defending a Jewish sex trafficker and helping him get away with his crimes, you’re in a very, very bad place, Donald.

And all you’re doing is giving these other Jews ammunition – because in this situation, they literally do have the moral high ground.

Acosta should have never been hired. And he should have been fired immediately when the reports came out that the way he handled the Epstein case was illegal.

This is just so stupid.

We need to hire a special counsel to investigate what the disgusting and evil Jew Jerrold Nadler did with all of those Smurfs he kidnapped.

We know he ate them.

But I believe that he almost certainly did something sick and sexual with them before he ate them.

Just look at this rat fuck.

Now you know why Jews spread the “you can’t judge a book by its cover” meme to children. Because they all look like they crawled up out of hell to rape babies and Smurfs.

Fox News:

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-NY, argued on Sunday that, despite Special Counsel Robert Mueller deciding not to charge President Trump with obstruction of justice, he believes there is still plenty of evidence of obstruction by the president.

Nadler, who filed a subpoena Friday for Mueller’s full, unredacted report, said that Mueller only restrained from charging Trump with obstruction of justice because of the longstanding Justice Department opinion that a sitting president can’t be indicted.

“Mueller says that although a thorough FBI investigation might very well show evidence of obstruction of justice with the president, ‘we’re not going to do that because of the Department of Justice’s legal opinion that a president, a sitting president, can’t be indicted and it would be unfair to lay out the facts justifying an indictment without giving the president the opportunity and a trial to clear his name,’” Nadler said on Sunday during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet The Press.”

He added: “[Attorney General William] Barr misinterpreted that, or misrepresented that I should say, to say they didn’t find obstruction. There’s plenty of evidence of obstruction.”

Nadler expects the Justice Department to comply with his committee’s subpoena for the full report by May 1.

That’s the same day Barr is set to testify before a Senate committee and one day before he is to appear before Nadler’s panel. Nadler also has summoned Mueller to testify by May 23.

A Justice Department spokeswoman, Kerri Kupac, called Nadler’s move “premature and unnecessary.”

Barr sent Congress a redacted version of the Mueller report, blacking out several types of material, including classified information, material pertaining to ongoing investigations and grand jury evidence.

Nadler last week said he was open to working with the department on accommodations, but he also said the committee “needs and is entitled to the full version of the report and the underlying evidence consistent with past practice.”

Mueller laid out multiple episodes in which Trump directed others to influence or curtail the Russia investigation after the special counsel’s appointment in May 2017, and Trump made clear that he viewed the probe as a potentially mortal blow — “the end of my presidency.”

Nadler on Sunday questioned why Mueller did not level charges against the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., for taking a meeting with Russian operatives in Trump Tower to allegedly get compromising information on Trump’s 2016 Democratic presidential opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“I do not understand why he didn’t charge Don Jr. and others in that famous meeting with criminal conspiracy,” Nadler said. “[Mueller] said that he didn’t charge them because you couldn’t prove that they didn’t willfully intend to commit a crime, well you don’t have to prove that.”

He added: “All you have to prove for conspiracy is that they entered into a meeting of the minds to do something and had one overt act. They entered into a meeting of the minds to attend a meeting to get stolen material on Hillary. They went to the meeting. That’s conspiracy right there.”

The New York lawmaker also added that the idea of the House impeaching the president is still on the table even as some of his Democratic colleagues in the House have warned against any premature actions.

“If proven some of this would be impeachable yes. Obstruction of justice, if proven, would be impeachable,” Nadler said. “We’re going to see where the facts lead us.”

These people are not going to let this go.

They invested too much into to just give up.

Even though the smart thing would be to move on.

Nadler and Schiff cannot.

Because they’re Jewish.

Just sent a letter to @DHSgov IG demanding and investigation into the death of a 7-year-old girl in U.S. government custody. And you better believe we will be asking @SecNielsen questions about this at the @HouseJudiciary hearing next week. https://t.co/zmTMgJphcF pic.twitter.com/edwuIrewsL

— (((Rep. Nadler))) (@RepJerryNadler) December 14, 2018

I can’t believe this filthy fat kike Jerry Nadler still has triple parentheses around his name on Twitter.

This vile Jew is just angry this child died so he couldn’t rape it.

Look at him.

Why do you imagine a man who looks like that has an interest in 7-year-old children?

Jews are child-rapists. 

And these known child-rapists want to pretend like white Border Patrol agents would literally murder a child on purpose.

Fox News:

Congressional Democrats are demanding a full investigation into U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials after a 7-year-old Guatemalan girl died last week while in U.S. custody, a report said Friday.

Five senior Democratic lawmakers, including members who will soon chair the House Judiciary and Homeland Security committees, sent a letter on Friday to the Department of Homeland Security’s acting inspector general, John Kelly, urging an investigation into the death of Jakelin Amei Rosmery Caal Maquin, The Washington Post reported.

The lawmakers cited “the seriousness of this tragedy and the many questions that remain,” according to the paper.

“The investigation should focus on policies and practices designed to protect health and safety, as well as policies and practices that may result in increased migration through particularly harsh terrain,” the letter said.

This is absolute bullshit.

The media even admits that the girl died only 8 hours after being taken into custody, and that they’d been wandering the desert for days like idiot Jews.

Who else is blaming white people for this, you ask?

Why our fellow white person, (((((((Chucky Schumer))))))).

A 7-year-old girl should not be dying of dehydration and shock in Customs and Border Protection custody.

Secretary Nielsen and @DHSgov must be held accountable for Jakelin Amei Rosmery Caal Maquin’s death. https://t.co/W1jMYJWc7Q

— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) December 14, 2018

These people just never stop.

You’d think at some point they’d be like “eyyy those goyim on the internet know, we’d best chill out for a minute on having only Jews come out and attack white people and Donald Trump for completely insane reasons.”

But no.

The more people on the internet talk about them, the more they use parentheses around their names on Twitter and the more they make abrasive kook statements about white people killing children on purpose.

Seriously, how totally unhinged and disconnected from reality do you have to be to hear these Jews claiming that the Border Patrol murdered a 7-year-old child on purpose, and be like “yeah, that Jew is right – this makes perfect sense”?