But by claiming “globalist” means “Jew,” are not Jews admitting to being globalists?

Do you see the way this whole thing moved from “you can’t accuse the Jews of doing the things they’re actually doing” to “everything the Jews do is good because they are Jews so you can’t criticize any of it”?

Breitbart:

A debate has emerged in Britain over the term ‘globalist’, with elements of the legacy media and social media arguing that using the word to describe the political ideology of preferring super state over state is actually a racist term against Jewish people.

Following what many, such as Brexit leader Nigel Fage, have described as a “globalist coup” to install former Goldman Sachs banker and World Economic Forum (WEF) acolyte Rishi Sunak as prime minister, left-wing figures have attempted to make the very term “globalist” an off-limits slur, claiming that it is antisemitic.

Last week, Nigel Farage tweeted: “Jeremy Hunt is now running the country. This is a globalist coup.” Mr Farage went on to make similar comments following the installation of Grant Shapps as Home Secretary.

The statements were condemned by Jewish groups, despite the fact that Mr Hunt is not Jewish but rather a member of the Church of England. Mr Shapps comes from a Jewish family.

Criticising the use of the term, Marie van der Zyl, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said: “Antisemitism experts such as the Anti Defamation League identify ‘globalist’ as a common antisemitic trope based on conspiracy theories about international Jewish power. Politicians should avoid using the term, particularly when referring specifically to Jewish individuals.”

The linguistic dispute came to a head on Sunday, when a caller to the LBC radio station echoed Mr Farage’s sentiments in describing Sunak as a “globalist” who “doesn’t seem to love England”.

For this remark, LBC host Sangita Myska, formerly of the BBC, chastised the caller, saying: “As we continue this conversation, please don’t use the phrase globalist again because many of my Jewish listeners will find that incredibly offensive because it has also been used, at times, as a racist put down to the Jewish community.”

“That’s not true,” the listener shot back. “If I meant Jewish, I’d say Jewish.”

Words being banned by mainstream media, this is not good. https://t.co/ZkAG8zhwl8

— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) October 24, 2022

Commenting on the exchange, Mr Farage, who was previously a host for LBC, lamented: “Words being banned by mainstream media, this is not good”.

Mr Farage also shared the Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of globalism, which states: “The belief that events in one country affect those in all other countries, and that economic and foreign policy should benefit the world as a whole instead of individual countries.”

Anglican deacon and GB News host Calvin Robinson also took aim at language policing from the media, writing on social media: “Be wary of anyone who hears ‘globalist’ and thinks ‘THE JEWS!’

“As ever, they are the very thing they accuse us of. A globalist is a politician who operates on an international perspective, rather than a local/national perspective. It’s only a slur in the mind of antisemitics.”

This is obviously bullshit.

The anti-globalisation movement and protests of the 1990s were categorically green and anti-capitalist.

Those movements found their peace (or price) with globalisation.

Now, nearly a third a century later, a historical smear is invented. https://t.co/HYxhxM7sQX

— Ben Pile (@clim8resistance) October 25, 2022

Political commentator and Spiked! columnist, Ben Pile noted that the origins of the anti-globalist movement were left-wing in nature, highlighting the protests against the World Trade Organization (WTO) such as the anti-capitalist ‘Battle of Seattle’ in 1999 in which black bloc anarchists rampaged through the American city, smashing businesses along their way. It has been estimated that Seattle businesses lost some $20 million in lost sales and property damage during the protests.

The Jews have a big problem now.

Twitter is going live.

We’re going to see who the globalists are. Actually, we don’t need to see that because they already admitted that part. But we’re going to see what else they’re doing – and we’re going to see it quickly.

Greenblatt – hit me up, bro. I’ve got a few questions about the Jew people and their actions. You can just explain it to me on Twitter. I just want to understand what exactly it is that you’re up to.

We’re at the point now where it is safe to assume that all pharmaceuticals are a money scam, and most of them are designed to actually kill you.

In the very best case, they don’t care if you die or have mutant children, because they will never face any actual consequences. It’s just like with the financial industry – the profits always outweigh the fines, and no one can ever go to prison, let alone be executed, for purposeful fraud that kills people or creates mutant children.

Metro:

A drug which has harmed at least an estimated 20,000 Brits is still being prescribed to pregnant women without appropriate warnings, a former health secretary says.

The anti-epilepsy medication sodium valproate – which has been linked to physical malformations, autism and developmental delay in many children when it is taken by their mothers – is ‘a major risk to patient safety’, according to Jeremy Hunt.

He urged ministers to find an ‘immediate fix’ to prevent ‘avoidable harm’.

Doctors are said to have known in 1973 that the epilepsy drug posed a risk to unborn children.

Yet almost 50 years later, a review published in 2020 estimated that 20,000 young Britons had been affected after being exposed to it as developing babies.

At that time, the findings suggested ‘hundreds’ of babies were still being born each year to mothers taking sodium valproate without being aware of the risks.

Newer figures suggest 222 pregnant women were exposed to the drug from 2018 to 21, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said.

It said exposure rates have been declining since the Pregnancy Prevention Programme was introduced, and rates in 2020/21 are ‘substantially lower’.

One of those was Catherine McNamara, who was told the medication was safe during pregnancy, but burst into tears when told her son Sebastian’s deformities were permanent, the Sunday Times reported.

His hands were unnaturally twisted and facing in the wrong direction, with one missing a thumb.

She blamed herself, while another victim said she had been given the drug without a safety information leaflet.

A spokesperson for NHS England said it has set up an expert group to help cut the use of valproate by women who can get pregnant in half.But Mr Hunt, who chairs the health and social care select committee, does not believe that is enough and compared the problem to the Thalidomide scandal.

He told the Sunday Times: ‘It’s time the British state faced up to its responsibilities. Just as we eventually did to victims of the thalidomide scandal.

‘It beggars belief that after so many warnings this still hasn’t been sorted.

‘This is a major risk to patient safety and ministers must order an immediate fix to prevent any more avoidable harm.’

Dr Alison Cave, MHRA chief safety officer, said valproate use in pregnancy carries ‘significant risks of harm to the baby’ and it ‘should not be taken by any individual of child-bearing potential unless they have a pregnancy prevention programme in place, which includes use of effective contraception’.

Each year, every woman on the drug and their healthcare professional needs to sign an annual risk acknowledgement form, as her circumstances regarding the risk of pregnancy might change, Dr Cave added.

She said work is continuing on use of the drug in people ‘where there are no other viable options available’.

Mr Hunt launched a review in 2018 into how the health service responded to concerns over sodium valproate.

I think we can say that antibiotics were a good invention. Bacteria is real, and antibiotics can clear an infection. One time I scraped my knee during a motorcycle accident and thought it would just heal, and instead it got infected and there was green pus coming out of it. If it wasn’t for antibiotics, it’s possible I would have had to have had my leg removed.

Also, antibiotics can save babies.

I don’t know of any pharma drug invented after antibiotics that I would feel safe taking or recommending to others.

Most of the increases in health outcomes over the last 100 years or so are the result of increased sanitation. There are some increases in surgery techniques of course that save lives. But basically from top to bottom, pharma is a gigantic money scam.

Most of the problems that they prescribe drugs for can be fixed through diet and exercise.

You should also ensure to get sun on your ball sack.

Maybe try this before taking drugs?

Without the slightest hint of pretence at being concerned for the White people descended from his ancestors, MP Jeremy Hunt has instead started fretting that his half-gook children may grow up to be resented like all the other invasive species in the country, the Daily Mail reports.

He is concerned that because the land is being flooded with living waste-products from all around the world, the authentic Britons might be hostile to his abominations as well, and resent them using the NHS.

What he seems to be forgetting, is that you forfeit the heritage your ancestors provided for you, if you fail to reproduce those ancestors again in your offspring.

They did not provide what they did for the enemies of their kind, but for their posterity, in whose blood they continue to live on in.