“Child coronavirus” is a hoax. “The Coronavirus” does not exist, it’s just an amalgamation of various respiratory infections. Of course, respiratory problems would be increasing after you forced people to wear masks all day long for 18 months.

American children are fat and unhealthy in general, so you would expect them to have various health problems. If you give them a fake PCR test, anything they have to go to the hospital for will be labeled “covid.”

I also think the hospitals might just be outright lying about the numbers of children being labeled with the disease.

The Texas Tribune this week inflated these alleged “child covid” numbers by 43X in a fake news article. They later issued a retraction, saying that the numbers were totally fake.

That’s one heck of a correction. https://t.co/UBBgV0OXXm pic.twitter.com/uhxkYABwR3

— Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) August 12, 2021

Jeez, Texas Tribune, the hospitalization numbers for the time period indicated didn't pass the sniff test one bit. This is a doozy of a correction (and strange phrasing for it too, imo). pic.twitter.com/k8CE2Jr9oZ

— Liz Wolfe (@lizzywol) August 12, 2021

I did the math here.

The claim: 828 hospitalizations a day

Reality: 19 a day

Only off by about 43x.

— Brent Scher (@BrentScher) August 12, 2021

But you know who didn’t issue a retraction?

The WaPo neocon Jew Jennifer Rubin, who still has the tweet she posted about the fake news up on his Twitter page.

https://twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/1425838553938935809

She’s refusing to take it down.

I suspect she will eventually (probably shortly after this article is published on Hoax Watch), so here’s a screenshot.

But as of right now, Fox News has an article up about her spreading this fake news, and she is still refusing to take it down. She’s tweeted during this time, so she isn’t incapacitated, and she can’t possibly not know by now – meaning she is purposefully spreading fake news.

Of course, “purposefully spreading fake news” is something Jews do every day, but it usually isn’t so definitive, where you can nail them on knowingly and purposefully disinforming the public.

Jennifer Rubin is on about how mass vaxxing the children is “pro-life.”

This is a woman who promoted a war policy that has killed millions of people, and still promotes murdering children in Palestine and Yemen and anywhere else on the list. She’s also of course pro-abortion.

And who even knows what she does in her private time…

Other liberals also spread this bullshit, even though it was obvious on the face of it it was false.

Waiting for @PolitiFact losers to fact-check this. Or @TwitterSupport to fix it.

— Dan Gainor (@dangainor) August 12, 2021

This is the microcosm of the entire coronavirus hoax, which is just a pile of purposeful lies by Jews intended to oppress the population.

The coronavirus is the Apex Hoax. It is built on every other Jewish hoax thus far, but it is so much more extreme than any previous hoax that it is mind-boggling how it was possible.

Obviously, it was primarily and exclusively possible due to mass censorship – specifically of me.

So the @TexasTribune updates their trash, lying, fear-mongering story about hospitalized kids, but what happens when you have trash columnists like Jen Rubin, whose tweet is uncorrected with the actual info? Never trust Texas Tribune, never trust Jen Rubin https://t.co/cb4FoAH1nj

— Steve Krakauer (@SteveKrak) August 12, 2021

“Never trust Jen Rubin” is of course utter and pure anti-Semitism.

A classic canard, which borders on an all-out trope, is that Jews are liars and create hoaxes to dazzle the goyim.

It is important to constantly remember just how much the Jews hate white Christians.

Of course, you could never understand this level of hatred. No one, other than the Jews, is capable of holding this kind of hatred. And understand: this is a hatred not just for each of us, but for all of our ancestors, going back to Rome, and for our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

The purest form of hatred in this universe is the hatred that a Jew has for Jesus, and that hatred is being channeled by the Jews into a hatred of Donald Trump, who has, through serendipity, become the belligerent and beloved avatar of Christendom, here at the end of the world, as the Jews reach for full dominance of the planet.

I have never seen that hatred exemplified in a more archetypal form than in the articles of Jennifer Rubin, the Jew Washington Post columnist who is bizarrely billed as the paper’s “resident conservative.”

Technically, she claims to have stopped being a conservative last month, but that’s how she’s been identified for decades. It was in her Chyron every time I saw her on TV, for my entire life.

She claimed Friday night that Biden, who mumbled through the debate and wasn’t even making sense when he spoke, won the debate.

The hatred oozes out of every sentence. She doesn’t even pretend like it’s not personal. As a president, in terms of policy itself, Trump has been a normal republican for the most part, just a bit less pro-war and a bit more pro-borders. All of this “no true conservative” stuff that the “Republican Jews” did in 2016 really means much now. So they’re apparently comfortable just making it evident that their hatred is personal.

She writes for The Post:

The good news is that we likely will never be forced to endure another debate featuring President Trump.

The better news is that even before the Thursday night event, Trump sabotaged himself by pre-releasing an interview for “60 Minutes” with CBS News’s Lesley Stahl in which he declared flatly that he hoped the Supreme Court would invalidate the Affordable Care Act. “I hope that they end it. It’ll be so good if they end it,” Trump said. This is what they call in soccer an “own goal.” Former vice president Joe Biden could not have asked for more going into a debate. But as a bonus, Trump not only displayed his whiny, thin-skinned demeanor, but he also let on that he has no replacement health-care plan for Obamacare.

Nothing that occurred during Thursday night’s debate increases the chances we will have to endure four more years of the unhinged, know-nothing narcissistic president. Voters who made it through the 90-minute event saw a sharper, more fact-filled Biden than they have seen in previous performances. Meanwhile, the meandering, mean-spirited president was forced to resort to a flood of lies.

It is fantastic to imagine a Jew accusing a Christian of lying.

The most dishonest Christian man who ever lived told more truth, if only by accident, than the most honest Jew.

First, Trump appeared subdued at the onset. Deprived of the opportunity to interrupt by the mute button, he rambled and repeated self-congratulations during his time allotments. He insisted he could raise as much money as Biden has (claiming incorrectly that Biden’s had received the bulk of his money from Wall Street), but chose not to.

That’s actually bullshit, Jew.

Related: Joe Biden Walked Right Into That “Funded by Wall Street” Thing

But okay. If you want to parse out whether Trump indicated “most” or “a lot” of the money came from Wall Street, then okay.

He said: “You’re the one that takes the money from Wall Street, not me.” Doesn’t sound like he said “bulk of his money,” but okay, Jew. Whatever, Jew.

Trump is plainly sensitive that he was clobbered in the money race. He has never learned what matters to voters. When Biden argued that we should talk about real issues affecting American families, Trump mocked him. Rarely has a politician showed such contempt for voters. Never has a president bragged that a dictator liked him more than his predecessor. Trump’s reticence was short-lived as he embarked on long-winded and often incoherent riffs filled with ludicrous accusations.

It is truly incredible, the audacity of the Jew.

Trump was incoherent.

Talking about the laptop from hell was “ludicrous accusations.”

Second, Trump still has not come up with a realistic plan to fight covid-19. He has yet to develop any sense of compassion, and he remains unable to take responsibility for the crisis.

…

Most galling, he insisted we are “learning to live with” the pandemic. Biden pounced to reiterate that more than 220,000 Americans have died from the disease. Once more, Trump was illogical and nonsensical: “We have the best testing in the world by far — that’s why we have so many cases!”

Imagine pandering to people so moronic that they are willing to believe it is “illogical and nonsensical” that more testing leads to more recorded cases.

It is a kind of exploitation, what Jew journalists do, this open appeal to base idiocy. Here’s the thing: they make the idiot feel smart. It’s yet another deal with the devil.

Third, Trump was so intent on spinning strange and convoluted conspiracy theories that it is doubtful anyone outside the loony-tunes world of right-wing media understood what he was talking about. (At one point, Trump said something about Biden selling pillows and sheets.) All Biden had to do was smile and suppress a laugh.

Again, appeal to morons. I don’t expect everyone to have followed the Ukrainian conflict, but surely, they can Google it? Or maybe you just can’t use Google at all anymore, because of these Jews suppressing search results?

Rubin is a neocon, so she knew what this was a reference to – several Republicans claimed that Obama wasn’t doing enough to arm the Ukrainians, after he overthrew their government.

Devin Nunes said it:

It became a meme at the impeachment, with Democrats quoting it because so many people were saying it:

There is zero chance Rubin doesn’t know that. And she knows that smart people know she knows it. So she is openly lying, playing stupid in a way that she knows anyone with half a brain will recognize as a charade.

It’s actually frightening to me when Jews lie like this to manipulate stupid people, knowing that everyone who isn’t stupid will see it for what it is.

Fourth, Biden was strongest on health care, reminding us that Trump has no plan and has never had one. He reiterated his support for a public option, not for Medicare-for-all. His best line may have been: “Ten million people now have pre-existing conditions because of the president’s handling of covid. What are they going to do?” As Trump insisted Biden wanted to destroy private health insurance, Biden responded, “He’s a very confused guy. He thinks he’s running against someone else. He’s running against me, Joe Biden.”

Are you sure he’s Joe Biden, Rubin?

I’m gonna need a fact check on that, because I think you might be confusing him with the Other Biden.

Joe Biden only this year, after the coronavirus thing, started saying people could keep their plans.  He was saying something different before.

Furthermore, Biden is very old and is going to die soon. His VP nominee is a lunatic, who said she didn’t want private healthcare to exist at all.

Again, Rubin is lying about obvious things to make stupid people feel smarter.

Fifth, Biden made hay of his focus on working- and middle-class Americans, pointing out that Trump’s measure of success is the stock market. “Where I come from in Scranton and Claymont, the people don’t live off the stock market,” Biden said. His emphatic support for a $15 minimum wage was likely a winner in critical swing states. When Trump started trashing “Democrat cities,” Biden shot back that he would be the president for all of Americans.

Yes, talking points for morons. Imagine taking that seriously. Imagine taking “he wants to talk about my family, but I want to talk about your family” seriously.

Boomers are like small children who view it as the job of politicians to whisper bedtime lullabies in their ears.

Sixth, Trump’s utter lack of decency came when he insisted conditions for kids at the border were just swell.

…

Biden emotionally hit back, “Separating children from their parents violates every value we hold as a nation.”

Yes, literally “our values, it’s who we are.”

Listen, there are people who get stirred up when someone says “our values dearly.”

“Even though he’s totally senile, I’m going to vote for that communist who wants to abolish the police and make it so blacks can’t go to prison, and flood our country with infinite immigrants, and kill as many infants as possible, and start wars all over the world, and raise taxes to 62%, and spend tens of billions of dollars building windmills, and force everyone into a permanent coronavirus lockdown, because he really made me proud when he said it was our values to dump immigrant children on the streets of America.”

That alone is proof enough that democracy needs to be abolished, immediately. It has failed.

Finally, on climate change, Biden made his case on job growth and green energy as Trump insisted windmills “kills all the birds.” He added this mumbo jumbo: “And the fumes coming up, if you are a believer in carbon emission, the fumes coming up to make these massive windmills is more than anything we’re talking about with natural gas, which is very clean.” It was one more reminder Trump is stunningly ignorant.

Again, it’s just another brazen appeal to stupidity.

There are arguments in favor of wind and arguments against it, but Trump summarized the argument against it in a perfectly clear way: the very well-documented and scientific argument is that wind turbines increase carbon emissions.

So, this was printed in a peer-reviewed science journal, and reviewed by the British government. Calling it “mumbo-jumbo” is just “orange man stupid and bad, you reader, you smart one, you read words, you are smart one, he a dumb one.”

The Jew Rubin closes with this bullshit:

Biden had the final words of the debate, making a heartfelt pitch for decency and character. If Americans decide that is the defining issue, the election will not be close.

What does it mean?

Well, the only thing it can mean is “to be nice and talk nice.”

But Rubin is so filled with hatred, and that this is just cartoonish.

It’s like Skeletor saying that the reason he wants to kill He-Man is that he doesn’t think he’s nice enough.

If you’re wondering why Rubin is billed as a “conservative,” then let me just go ahead and explain that to you: conservatives don’t read the WaPo. Low IQ moron leftists, many of them women, read it.

It is literally the “I want to feel smart but the New York Times is too hard for me” paper.

Note: You might enjoy posting links into this “readability” calculator, which gives you that Flesch Kincaid grade level score of articles. You will find that the WaPo is always significantly lower than the NYT. (The tool is legit, measuring the length of sentences and the difficulty of the words used.)

If they read this bitch confirming all of their positions, they say to themselves: “well, this must not all be completely insane – even the smart conservatives agree with everything I believe.”

It cuts out part of the fear that liberals must have that they are supporting a lunatic agenda to drive this country off a cliff in the name of niceness and vague notions of “values.”

We need to start regulating these Jews. Their emissions, like this piece from Jennifer Rubin, are destroying our environment.

I did my best to NOT call for donations for Tulsi Gabbard. What happened was, there was 48 hours left to meet the donation amount that would get her into the debates, and she was nearly 2,000 donations short of meeting the threshold. So as anyone who was around those days will remember, I put a banner up and demanded that everyone give her a dollar to ensure she got into the debates.

I purposefully waited until the last minute, and I only did it when it was clear she wouldn’t get into the debates if I didn’t do it.

Obviously, I wanted her in the debates because she talks about real issues that actually matter, so I had to make a decision between tainting her with all of the gibberish that the media says about this website and her not getting in the debates at all, and I did what I thought was the right thing to do.

The media wasn’t going to mention this fact if she didn’t get traction, because they now avoid mentioning me by any means necessary, given that I run circles around them with my preternatural ability to manipulate their narratives (large think tanks have done gigantic studies on this ability that I have, and their advice was to simply stop mentioning me, totally).

But Tulsi has gotten traction. Her common sense speech in the last debate and her destruction of Kamala Harris the cop got her a whole lot of attention. Her policies are popular, they are something that unites both the left and right.

Jews absolutely hate Tulsi because she is opposed to their endless war agenda, and she is in fact the only candidate who makes a point to speak the truth about Israel’s involvement in these wars. She also defends Bashar al-Assad and calls out the stupid “gassing his own people” hoaxes.

So, the Jews have decided to start attacking her over my support for her. They are demanding that she give back the money given to her by “neo-Nazis.”

The story was originally printed on a Jewish-Israeli website.

.@TulsiGabbard does not respond to requests for comment about Neo-Nazi donations to her campaign — or whether they will be returned — from @Bencjacobs. Daily Stormer took credit for getting her qualified for first debates. https://t.co/iqHZFfTqg9

— Jonathan Allen (@jonallendc) August 5, 2019

Now, the disgusting yenta fiend Jennifer Rubin, a WaPo columnist, is out there saying it.

If she doesn’t Party should kick her out of next debate. Enough

— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) August 5, 2019

As is Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the Israeli lobbying group the Anti-Defamation League.

Public officials and political candidates should never accept support from white supremacists like Andrew Anglin, founder of neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer. We call on @TulsiGabbard to denounce him and return any of these alleged donations. https://t.co/jPon6bbMFx

— Jonathan Greenblatt (@JGreenblattADL) August 6, 2019

The demand that she “give back neo-Nazi donations” is utterly nonsensical on a number of different levels.

Firstly, terrorist Jews like Rubin and Greenblatt have continually failed to offer a definition of what they mean when they use this term. I am not a “neo-Nazi,” and I do not know what it means. Certainly, most readers of this website do not identify as “neo-Nazis.” The people who heeded my call to donate to Tulsi are American citizens with the same rights as anyone to participate in the political process.

Secondly, how is she supposed to figure out who the “neo-Nazi” donors were? Is she just supposed to give back all of the donations made during the time period that I was promoting her?

I did not personally give a donation, and I doubt anyone else who is a doxed White Advocate did either.

Is she supposed to check her donations for Nazi-sounding names?

Should she compare her donations list with the SS directory?

Obviously, the Jews calling for this know that it is a nonsense demand. They can simply continue making the demand and use it to try to destroy her. It is similar to their demands that explain how she is not a Russian agent. They are imposing a standard which she cannot meet.

She is right to simply not respond. They will probably not make this a huge issue.

She should disavow Nazism and say that everyone who gave her a donation is an American citizen who wants to see change in this country.

If they do continue to claim that this brown-skinned woman is a neo-Nazi, that might actually end up being good for her, as it increases her underdog status given that it is such a bizarre attack. And people like underdogs.

Furthermore – she shouldn’t care about this, but I do – talking about how evil neo-Nazis support a nonwhite woman because she is against war actually really significantly damages their general narrative about evil White people.

“These Nazis are pure evil – just look at them trying to elect a Samoan woman as president because she doesn’t want to fight World War 3 to protect Islamic terrorists!” is a level of incoherence that the media can’t really sustain long-term. They simply cannot tell the truth about what we actually believe and maintain the claim that we are fundamentally evil.

Oh what’s this?

The Jewish Huffington Post citing the WaPo “kikeservative” Jennifer Rubin to prove that “even conservatives agree” Trump is evil and wrong?

You don’t say.

Huffington Post:

Jennifer Rubin says House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has already figured out how to handle President Donald Trump. 

“To say [Pelosi] has mastered the art of dealing with President Trump would be a gross understatement,” the conservative Washington Post columnist wrote on Wednesday.

The trick, Rubin said, is to treat Trump like a toddler in the middle of a meltdown.

Pelosi sent a letter to Trump on Wednesday asking to postpone the State of the Union address due to the government shutdown and security issues. Or, as Rubin put it, “she’s taking away the president’s TV” in response to his “nearly month-long temper tantrum.”

This is what we call the “kosher sandwich.”

It is actually a “kosher panini,” because you, the goyim, are smooshed between these two kosher pieces of Jew bread.

What they do is have Jews on both sides of the political spectrum, so wherever you turn, there’s a kike there to shove you back in the Jew system.

Every position must be held by a Jew, in order to control whatever is happening on that front. And then, when they get a chance, the Jews give each other reach-arounds, as you see with the Jewington Post citing a “conservative” kike.

This example is a really obvious example of this phenomenon, which is why I’m pointing it out. But you have many less intuitive examples, such as Ben Shapiro being against trannies and also Donald Trump somehow, while also being a complete shill for Israel.

And by the way, I don't give a good damn about the so-called "browning of America." Color doesn't matter. Ideology does.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) June 16, 2017

Or you have Jacob Wohl being a Jewish Trump supporter, who is also obsessed with Israel.

Everyone in the pro-Israel lobby (myself included) is already talking about how to make sure that Tulsi Gabbard's campaign is over before it even gets off the ground — If you're going to bet on a Dem candidate, look elsewhere 🇮🇱

— Jacob Wohl (@JacobAWohl) January 12, 2019

On the left you have every conceivable position, from center-left to full-communist being controlled by Jews. Like, you’ve got these empowered brown people who are preparing to go on a jihad against Israel, something which I imagine makes a whole lot of Jews uncomfortable.

But then who is their leader?

Oh.

Another Jew.

Who is also a supporter of Israel’s alleged “right to exist.”

He even kicks Palestine supporters out of his rallies.

This is how it goes.

Jews must occupy every position. But if you look at them, it is very, very obvious that the shared factor among them is that they all support the Jews as a group.

In this Jewish system, normal people are like a blindfolded guy in a circle of guys waiting to punch him in the face whichever way he turns.

Jews really make it easy to understand anything that happens. Because all you have to do is look at what they’re saying, and know that they are promoting whatever it is that is evil and wrong.

So as I’ve been thinking about what George H.W. Bush’s presidency represented in the American experience following his death and all of this media about him, I was interested to see what the absolutely repulsive neocon Jew Jenifer Rubin had to say in the Jewish Washington Post.

For those unawares, the Jew Rubin, like all neocon Jews, spends the overwhelming majority of her time crafting explanations for the goyim as to why it is that they should feel very smart for supporting the Jew-globalist agenda. Because whereas liberalism is mainly a feminine endeavor, based on emotions, meaning that you can just show a liberal faggot a picture of diaper baby getting gassed and s/he will support a massive third world invasion of his own country, conservatism is a masculine ideology, so it seeks to have a higher ideal and be morally and ideologically consistent.

So the Jews invent these systems to sell the conservatives. They are a lot of times extremely complex seeming, but always come down to “and that’s why American blood and treasure needs to be spilled all over the place to forward the globalist agenda of the Jewish people.”

A group recently asked that the Washington Post stop referring to the Jew Rubin as a “conservative,” but the reality of the matter is that she is saying exactly what the neoconservatives have been saying since they began their movement. I do not know how many people continue to support this woman or her ideas – judging from the way she and others of her kin such as Max Boot and William Kristol behave, it certainly does not appear as though many people are supporting them. The only neocon Jew who is somewhat popular is Ben Shapiro, and that is almost exclusively due to his “edgy” positions on social issues in America, not due to his bloodthirsty demands for endless war for Israel.

Even if people no longer support neoconservatism, however, we should not ever forget that many, many people did support this deranged agenda and that it resulted in the entire Middle East destroy, thousands of Americans dying and trillions spent on wars, among other issues.

Up through the 1980s, many conservative thinkers were anti-Jewish in orientation, and were aware of these various tricks they use on unwitting goyim, so they could simply say outright: “this is a complex and confusing bunch of nonsense designed to get people to support the interests of the Jews.”

But then in the 80s, William F. Buckley’s National Review was successfully able to purge anyone who wasn’t 100% Jew-first from the conservative movement. They were then disallowed from publishing anywhere, in a time before the internet.

This was just before the time of George H.W. Bush. Elected in 1988, he was the first true globalist president. He was the first to push for international “free trade.” He launched the first Iraq war, which was the first interventionist war which was presented as a humanitarian rescue. Up until that point, every war had at least the veneer of “if we don’t go fight these people over there, they’re gonna end up over here.”

Clinton would go on to see NAFTA through, and would also launch a second “save them with bombs” war against Serbia, using the Iraq war as a precedent.

So it is no surprise that Jews are making a huge deal of Bush’s death.

Rubin’s piece on Bush’s legacy focuses mainly on praising his handling of the end of the Cold War and the fall of communism, which was the worst disaster of the 20th century.

Conservatives really hated communism, and the Jews were successful in turning that ideological hatred for communism into a hatred of the Soviet Union. The Jews of course do not themselves hate communism, and in fact invented it. What they do hate is the Russians. They hate the Russians more than any other group. Even though Jews have a shorter history with the Russians, they have out-placed the Persians at the top of the Jewish hate list.

So when the Jews talked about “defeating communism,” what they were actually talking about was “destroying Russia.” And when Rubin praises Bush’s handling of the end of the Cold War, what she is praising is making sure that Russians were not able to regroup, and sunk into a decade of hell after their country was split into a bunch of different pieces.

She quotes Colin Powell and other Bush people who are currently out there talking about what a great person this man was. None of them are talking about Iraq, even though they absolutely consider the first Iraq war as a model for using American military might to cripple what could potentially be a threat to the Jews. I think this is because Trump has successfully soured people on the entire Iraq adventure, to the point where they can’t even talk about the first war without making people angry.

She closes the article with a curse on Trump’s name, stating without much room for confusion that when Trump is dead, he will not get celebrated like Bush, and will instead be written in history the same way Adolf Hitler is written:

You cannot help but make the comparison between Bush 41 and his administration, on the one hand, and, on the other, the current crew. The liars, braggarts and bullies who’ve populated this administration will have their legacy, too. None of their ludicrous lies can change history’s verdict; none of them will be heralded for leaving American democracy stronger than when they entered office. Neither in their personal dealings nor in their policy choices will they be seen as kind or considerate. They’ve torn up international agreements, frayed relationships (here and abroad) and deformed institutions. When it comes to history’s verdict, Democrats — and a great many Republicans (if the party still exists) — will enumerate their indictments, lies, horrid appointments, scandals and policy failures. They won’t be missed.

The President should understand this.

If he does not beat these Jews, they will make him and his family suffer for it, and after they are gone, he and all of them will have their names used as curses by the Jews, in the exact same way as happened to poor old Adolf. I am quite certain they will, if they are given a chance, invent some new Holocaust-like mythos of suffering to ascribe to Trump.

He should be aware of that.

The violently anti-white, Israel first fanatic Jennifer Rubin is at it again. This sexually ambiguous inbred arachnid spent all of 2016 demonizing white people as the Washington Post’s in-house “conservative” (!). Now she is terrified at what may be in store for 2018: cucks getting mass primary’d in a ballot box shoah!

To add some context, Jews like Jennifer Rubin have been pushing the narrative that a party that advocates for the white majority can never win. Trump proved that Rubin was lying, and now that she’s been found out she is telling her tribe’s loyal servants Mealy Mouth and Weasel Boy (McConnell and Ryan) to break away and found a new party.

She writes for Washington Post:

President Trump capitalized on unhinged anger that had been brewing for years on the right — among talk radio listeners and Fox News viewers, among anti-immigrant groups fanning fear of brown-skinned newcomers, among more “respectable” pundits spinning a tale that the “establishment” had betrayed “real” Americans. With Hillary Clinton there to generate a vicious Pavlovian response on the right, Trump squeaked by with some substantial help from Russians, who either fantastically understood the dynamic on the right or had some direction as to where to direct their social media messaging.

Like the proverbial dog that caught the bus, the GOP now finds it impossible to govern rationally with an irrational base and equally irrational media echo chamber.

…

In other words, if politicians and voters on the right and center-right want rational, productive governance, they need a new base of voters. That sounds strange. A party or section of a party that wants to fire its base? Well, that is precisely what happened in the 1960s, when the Democrats unloaded white Southern anti-integrationists, ceding the South to the GOP. It could do so because the population in the North and Midwest was growing, minorities were registering and voting in large numbers and previously non-voting or infrequent-voting segments of American electorate (e.g. the youth vote, legal immigrants) sided with Democrats.

…

Rather than pursue the fruitless effort to woo and persuade these voters, traditional Republicans should consider reverse-engineering their party. Their beliefs — support for free-market economics with a safety net; American leadership in the world; defense of institutions that restrain demagogic power and faith in government not to solve all problems, but to create conditions that solve some problems; support for civic virtues (empathy, civility, etc.) — may find a following among suburbanites, college-educated voters, immigrants, nontraditional families (who have been scorned by social conservatives), millennials, small-business people, workers in the New Economy and Democrats and independents resistant to that party’s tilt toward Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Western European-style democratic socialism. Maybe that’s enough to form a viable national party; perhaps it’s merely half of a new coalition with center-left, disaffected Democrats.

Does that sound a bit shaky, a proposition without a clear path to success? Indeed, but just as Democrats in the 1960s had to make the leap from the party of Southern segregationists to the party of civil rights, so, too, will Republicans who want rational governance reflective of their democratic ideals need to leave the party of Trump and find their own way in a chaotic political environment. If you cannot abide by the ethos that infuses a party’s base, you need to find a new base.

Let’s get one thing straight: the Republican party isn’t doing anything for anyone right now (except Israel). The problem the useless bellboys of Jewish plutocracy are having is Trump promised they would do their job and represent the people that voted for them. They can’t because their job is to destroy the people that elected them.

After Trump, Jews are in a mad rush to put the nail in the coffin of the white majority. Trump so far has been a graze, or even a warning shot regarding the anger brewing against their plan. The people are breathing down Trump and the GOP’s neck whenever they reach to scratch their neocon or amnesty itch…America is only one step away from seeing the Hebrew rash!

But talk is cheap, which is why Jews love it so much.

Jennifer Rubin knows full well that if Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell went on to form a new party, it would get less votes than The Rent Is Too Damn High Party. The GOP is a rotten institution with no future, its life support system is Trump, or more specifically, Trumpism. For the first time in many decades they are being pressured to consider making a compromise with – gasp – the people!

If you get the opportunity to primary Jeff Flake, Ben Sasse, Lindsay Graham, John Kasich or any other one of these anti-American traitors, do not miss your chance to. Get your entire family and all your friends to vote against them as a personal favor to you – it’s that important. Let’s throw as many of these bastards out of Congress and state government as possible.

Let them go join the Jennifer Rubin party!

Tucker Carlson is a one-man HOLOCAUST!

WaPo’s Jennifer Rubin went on there yesterday and got straight-up LAMPSHADED like her rat ancestors!

This comes after earlier in the week Tucker viciously SOAPED the rat Jew Hissing Weasel!

If Tucker doesn’t chill out on the GAS BUTTON the Jews are going to notice that his television show is nothing but a FAKE SHOWER ROOM.

I’m actually being serious here – if Tucker Carlson keeps having these Jews on and making them look stupid, he’s going to get accused of anti-Semitism and they’ll shut his show down.

Mark my words.

The story of 6,000,000 Jews being randomly killed in gas chambers and ovens immediately rubs people as textbook war atrocity propaganda, a tall tale that would be shut down if ever exposed to objective and free scientific, archival and mathematical inquiry. In spite of this, enough people believe in the Holocaust myth to give it some weight in public discourse.

Why?

They look at Jennifer Rubin. Read Jennifer Rubin. Interact with Jennifer Rubin. “How could the Germans not want to exterminate these people,” asks the average man on the street.

That is one gassable face, no?

Jennifer Rubin is so sickening that even longtime Jew-appeaser John Derbyshire had a lapse in career-conservative discipline in his Goebbels-moment fighting back against one of her many public presentations.

I don’t like Bill O’Reilly, but his statement in the above clip that her Washington Post column is a fraud and that she is a liar is great; it shows he’s at least partially ready to call a Jew exactly what it is. Basically, Rubin is accusing him of sucking up to Trump in a feckless and dishonest way through her instruments of influence, yet, when confronted directly provides no proof because she’s a liar.

For all you recovering Conservatives who still use “liberal” (“liberal” media, “liberal” academia) as a euphemism for Jew, Jennifer Rubin is a “highly respected veteran conservative commentator” (just like fellow neocon Charles Krauthammer – it’s a mystery why they are on every single panel discussing Donald Trump in the press when nobody actually agrees with them).

Rubin grinds like we do at the Daily Stormer, publishing one article a day attacking Trump, calling for repercussions against the few people who give Trump a fair hearing, racially abusing White people. Here are some examples of what Jennifer Rubin has been writing.

The GOP has become a pity party for white males:

A cottage industry of apologists for Donald Trump and his supporters has sprung up to excuse, justify, infantilize and pity his core group of white, non-college-educated males who lash out at immigrants and globalism more generally. Victims ignored by elites! The Emmy winners mock them! There are more than a few problems with this.

First, conservatives used to stand up for “creative destruction,” the rise and fall of businesses and entire industries, which is an intrinsic part of a dynamic free market. If you’re not a hard-core Libertarian, the average conservative has considered the solution to this problem to be a safety net and tax, education and other policies that allow workers to rebound; it has never been to halt the marketplace or shift to a government-planned economy. The latter has been tried and has failed, as conservatives are quick to point out when ridiculing Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) or other anti-capitalist wags. It also exempts these voters from responsibility for their lives. The coal town is depopulated? Yes, that’s sad, but why are they not moving — as immigrants do — to where the jobs are?

Third, Trump’s defenders seem to demand that we treat members of his base delicately for fear of ruffling their feathers and damaging their self-esteem. When you play the “Hollywood makes fun of us” card, you get perilously close to political correctness and emotional feebleness, not things Trump and his ilk are supposed to promote. Even worse, complaining that other people don’t wish them “Merry Christmas” — and then transforming that into a war against Christianity — is victimology rarely seen outside the “safe spaces” on college campuses.

Fourth, the pity party for lower-class white males excludes virtually everyone else. Are we expected to turn the economy inside out for the latter, even to the extent that it harms those who have prepared themselves for a competitive workplace — or who simply want to enjoy moderately priced consumer goods not priced out of their grasp by tariffs? Why concern ourselves with the delicate sensibilities of the “Merry Christmas”-deprived and not with Mexican immigrants (“murderers”), women (Trump thinks it’s a mistake to let wives work outside the home), African Americans (whose lives he insists are a “disaster”), the disabled, etc.?

There is no virtue in pandering to Trumpkins at the expense of every other group and the country’s general prosperity. In making these white males (and only them) into victims and encouraging them to blame outsiders or menacing forces beyond their control, Trump does what Republicans used to accuse liberals of doing — pitting one group against another in a zero-sum conception of the economy. It is doing the Trumpkins no favors and it is heightening dissension in a country that needs to rediscover common values and shared endeavors and undertake some systemic reforms in government, education and criminal justice.

The GOP needs to wise up about immigration:

On the other hand, the Trump GOP could stay where it is with its sliver of a sliver of an aging electorate. The sane center-right — in the mold of the Gang of Eight and conservative independent Evan McMullin — could embrace responsible reform on this and a host of issues that are actually popular with voters and in accord with conservative principles. They stand to pick up many groups that have viewed the GOP as anti-immigrant and/or economically short-sighted. As the old white males who made up Trump’s base (and Fox News’s TV audience) literally die off over the ensuing decades, there will be insufficient numbers to stand on the hill of irrational and unpopular stances like immigration restrictionism. By then, however, the GOP could be long gone, which it will if it doesn’t wise up on this and a host of other issues.

Fox and the GOP need radical makeovers:

Fox News argues that it is a legitimate news organization and that Sean Hannity, among other nighttime hosts, is “entertainment.” (If so, he should not get the “Fox News” logo nor the accessories of a newsman, but let’s leave that for another day.) The unhinged non-news Hannity, who is widely seen as an adjunct to Donald Trump’s campaign — even going so far as appearing in a campaign ad for the GOP presidential nominee — now has attacked an actual news host, Megyn Kelly. He accuses her of being in Hillary Clinton’s camp. This is as obnoxious as it is false. The question, however, is now teed up for the Fox News execs: Is it a real news network that cares about the integrity of its news personnel or a caricature of right-wing media — in the thrall of know-nothingism, conspiracy-mongering and plain dishonesty?

Hannity’s behavior is so inappropriate that one has to wonder whether he is trying to get booted — or justify an upcoming post-election change. Nevertheless, the responsibility is Fox’s. If it cares about the reputations of quality news figures (e.g. Bret Baier, Chris Wallace, James Rosen) it will dump Hannity or relegate him to 21st Century Fox’s entertainment division. Fox cannot be both a serious outlet and tolerate Hannity’s attack on the integrity of its news people. The latter should be letting their bosses know in no uncertain terms: It is time to choose between the Fox News brand and the Hannity brand. The two are incompatible. 

Note: Chris Wallace and James Rosen, who she calls on to pressure Fox into firing the sole pro-Trump pundit on TV, Hannity, are both Jewish.

Jennifer Rubin’s been around long before Trump. To get an even more succinct glimpse into the mind of a psychotic, lying, hate-filled killer, Rubin has in the past endorsed a call to literally mass exterminate Palestinian women and children by tossing them “into the sea, to float there, food for sharks, stargazers, and whatever other oceanic carnivores god has put there for the purpose.”

She is a frantic defender of the Iraq War and continues to agitate for war against the “Axis of Evil” and Russia, supports the Wall Street bailouts, believes completely open borders and neo-liberal trade agreements are “vital” – I can go on and on.

Every single policy position she lobbies for is to the detriment of every single person in the world who isn’t a Jew!

Jennifer might act like a know-it-all, but she doesn’t know us that well. There are a lot more of us “pathetic, dying white males” than there are Jews. One day, if she keeps on pushing us, she’s going to get a booming knock on her door in the middle of the night with a deportation order to Israel. And when she gets there, we’re going to temporarily redirect military aid to the Palestinians so that they can strafe her and her family with F-15’s like they have been doing to them for the last 60 years.

To quote a time-resilient African proverb, “Talk Shit, Get Hit.” “Intellectual Conservative leaders” like Bret Stephens and Jennifer Rubin ought to heed that kind of wisdom, and pray to Satan that they’re able to stave off what comes from the broken levy that will follow a Trump victory.

During the Middle Ages, Jews, particularly Jewish women, were known as remarkably skilled peddlers. The many wars during this period created an entire class of European widows, who would be forced into starting cottage industries when their husbands would perish on the battlefield. When they got to the market to sell their products, Gentile women would be overwhelmed by superior Jewish networking, collective interest-free loans (only for other Jews, of course), and worn-in trade secrets; thus, they would not be able to compete as individuals and were often doomed to crushing poverty. This was the harsh reality of a world that put profit above justice.

Today, the Jewish mastery of marketing no longer applies to cheap furniture or hosiery – Jews now specialize in selling world wars. In the case of Aleppo where Russian, Syrian and Iranian forces are trying to vanquish the major Al-Qaeda base and finally start putting an end to the bloody Civil War, there’s been a blitz in the Jewish controlled media to blasting pictures of injured or dying Syrian children – some of them quite European looking – with the malevolent intent of tugging at the heart strings of a war-weary public.

Jews and Israel advocates are demanding a “no-fly zone” over Aleppo, which would mean shooting down Russian jets and basically starting World War III.

The situation of the civilians in Aleppo is indeed quite sad, but Russian forces are already doing everything in their power to get humanitarian aid to the people there. I don’t think that it’s necessary to go in-depth on the hypocrisy of the Zionist government of America lecturing Russia about humanitarianism; millions of civilians have died at the hands of American bombers and sanctions in the Middle East since the 1990s thanks to the Jewish neo-conservative capture of the American government.

Where are the pictures of the children of Iraq?

All the Judeocratic powers have to do to end the siege of Aleppo is to stop supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS, and go home so Syria’s functional and secular government can be left alone to rebuild in peace. But that’s not what Israel wants, so common sense is off the table.  Even Pence cucked for the kike on this matter during the Vice Presidential debate – something Trump overruled him on later  – but this should raise at least one red flag, and let Trump know he needs to keep a close eye on him.

Three Cohens

You wouldn’t know any of this reading our controlled media. When looking at opinion pieces calling for war using Aleppo as a violin, there are three different people in the corporate media with the last name Cohen, chastising the US government and the American people for not bringing about the end of the world over some Jihadists. 

All three Cohens have an uncannily similar template in their propaganda, which makes me think they’re coordinating this: bring-up dead children, mock and attack America as “weak” for not enforcing a no-fly zone, call for America to start a world war with Russia to counter it’s extremely rational and restrained foreign policy pushing-back against American actions (supporting Jihadist take over of Middle East, overthrowing Ukrainian government in a coup, trying to surround Russia with missiles) that are in the interest of nobody except the truly demented and psychotic Jews crawling around in DC think-tanks and AIPAC lobby meetings.

Here is Roger Cohen in the New York Talmudic Times:

Aleppo is alone, alone beneath the bombs of Russian and Syrian jets, alone to face the violent whims of President Vladimir Putin and President Bashar al-Assad.

Oh, yes, I know, when the photograph of a child like Omran Daqneesh is seen, as it was this month, covered in blood after being dug from the rubble of Aleppo, the image may go viral just long enough for people to lament the Syrian debacle. Lament and forget. There’s Donald Trump to think about. Forget the more than 400,000 dead, the more than 4.8 million refugees, and the destruction of a city like Aleppo that is an expression of millennia of civilization.

…

No outcome in Syria could be worse than the current one. Assad’s bomb-spewing jets and his airfields should have been taken out early in the war, before ISIS. The red line should have stood. The consequences for the European allies of Obama’s let-Syria-fester policy have been overwhelming.

Watch the shattering video by Britain’s Channel 4 about the florist of Aleppo, the brave man who kept the city’s last flower store open, and weep. Understand that desperate people still beautify streets with flowers to assert life over death. The flower-seller is dead, his son’s terrible anguish that of a whole city.

Aleppo, symbol of failure, symbol of indifference, symbol of American retreat, should not have been left to bleed.

Here is Richard Cohen for the Washington comPost :

European politics has been upended — Germany’s Angela Merkel is in trouble, Britain has bolted from the European Union, and Hungary and Poland are embracing their shameful pasts — but there is yet another casualty of this war, the once-universal perception that the United States would never abide the slaughter of innocents on this scale. Yet, we have. Obama has proclaimed doing nothing as doing something — lives saved, a quagmire avoided. But doing nothing is not nothing. It is a policy of its own, in this case allowing the creation of a true axis of evil: a gleeful, high-kicking chorus line of Russia, Iran and Bashar al-Assad’s Syria. They stomp on everything in their path.

Aleppo then is like Guernica, a place of carnage. It’s also a symbol of American weakness. The same Putin who mucks around in Syria has filched U.S. emails and barged into the U.S. election. He has kept Crimea and a hunk of Ukraine and may decide tomorrow that the Baltics, once Soviet, need liberating from liberation. He long ago sized up Obama: all brain, no muscle.

Does all this stem from Uncle Sam’s bended knee in Syria? Who knows? But U.S. reluctance to act has almost certainly given others resolve. There was never any need for the United States to put boots on the ground — that has been Obama’s straw man, a totally fatuous excuse for inaction. A no-fly zone over Syria, just like the one George H.W. Bush imposed on Iraq to stop Saddam Hussein’s slaughter of the Kurds, would have saved countless lives. An Assad without an air force and his killer copters might now be Dr. Assad, the London eye doctor he once was.

The “Guernica” mural once seen is not forgotten — the anguished faces, the twisted bodies, the hideous deformities of violent death. Now we have the photo of the Syrian boy in an ambulance, iridescent red, powdered with the dust of gone buildings, staring vacantly at a world where, for him, there are no adults. Once again, little is being done. Once again, worse will follow.

And last but not least, Nick Cohen, for the “left-wing” British publication The Guardian, where this Jew shrieks in rage that neither the left-wing or right-wing are willing to take up his tribe’s cause of an apocalyptic clash of superpowers over Aleppo. It’s somewhat more subtle, written for a somewhat smarter audience (The Guardian is quickly becoming a publication oriented towards the neo-liberal elite):

Suppose western leaders called Russia’s bluff and insisted on a no-fly zone over Aleppo and a safe haven in northern Syria for refugees. I think you can imagine the reaction. I am very uncomfortable with the term “far left” for many reasons, not the smallest being that Corbynism is not an alien ideology that appeared from the fringe, but a grotesque version of the worst prejudices of polite society.

From the president of the United States, via the liberal left and nationalist right, to you and me, are we all Jeremy Corbyn now? When we turn off the pictures from Aleppo and look in the mirror, do we see the blandly wicked features of the Labour leader gazing back at us?

The cherry on top, by leaps and bounds, has been a public statement by Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, where he called the Russian siege of of Aleppo “a small Holocaust!”  and demanded Jews around the world lobby Western nations for war over it.

If you know anything about Rabbi Yosef, your jaw will drop at the audacity of his feigned humanitarian concern. In Jew-for-Jew sermons, this very same inbred monster calls for the full liquidation of all who are not racially Jewish living in or around Israel. This isn’t some Jewish version of an internet troll looking for shock value, this is a public official overseeing the Israeli government through its Rabbinate.

You’ll be hard pressed to find any Jew in a combat position in the US military, but it is Jews and people Jews pay (John McCain, Karl Rove, etc.) that are coming up with these delirious, unrealistic and outright dangerous geopolitical policies. If there’s a war, they’ll be safe, us young White men that they constantly browbeat will be in body bags – that’s why they want the wars.

In fact, just the other day, Jennifer Rubin (a #NeverTrump Jew) wrote a piece in the Washington Post demanding we bolster our “Sunni allies in Iraq and Syria” because it’s good for Israel. It is now proven fact that, at the very least, Qatar and Saudi Arabia (the entities Jews call their “Sunni allies”) are deploying ISIS and Al-Qaeda as their irregular armies to de-stabilize Iraq and Syria – the only kinds of Muslims actually killing us, who the good Muslims (Shiites: Iran, Syria, Hezbollah) are trying to stop.

To the Cohens, to the Rabbi, to Jennifer Rubin, all of our lives are completely meaningless outside of our servility to their race and their racial state of Israel.

Hence, the Jew is the enemy of all humanity. I’m not religious nor do I think ethnic politics are supernatural, but if I had to guess what Satan’s last name was, I’d put all my money on Cohen.

Goyim, I…

The problem is the Belgians.

Someone has to stop these Belgians.

rather than Syrians we should exclude Europeans who've been back and forth to Syria. But railing vs Belgians doesnt have much sell, huh?

— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) November 19, 2015

Bravo @jaketapper "this anti-refugee position is .. popular thing … but most of terrorists here in France appear to be French and Belgian"

— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) November 19, 2015

Obama and nativist critics both want to make Paris about immigrants — natl security records too shabby to defend https://t.co/l7wRRvVvAw

— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) November 19, 2015

understand Case for Accepting Syrian Refugees https://t.co/3dtM9VpCDa What's the case for Belgians and French nationals who went to Syria?

— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) November 19, 2015

The nerve of these Jews is simply incredible. Just imagine saying something like this with a straight face.

Note that this is exactly what I wrote, satirically, yesterday – I called for Obama to bomb Belgium to stop terrorism.

At some point, this Jewish narrative is going to get so goofy that it simply cannot sustain itself. I’d say that claiming Belgians and the French are the real terrorists – because race doesn’t exist and Moslems aren’t actually even Moslems or Arabs if they live in a different place – has got to be pretty close to the point of implosion.

What can possibly come after this?