jeffrey epstein – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png jeffrey epstein – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 BREAKING: Epstein was Walking on the Wild Side, Went Full Jungle Mode https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/03/breaking-epstein-was-walking-on-the-wild-side-went-full-jungle-mode/ Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000
Jeffrey Epstein pictured in 2003, recruiting hoes for his Mossad sex ring

So-called “survivors” of Jeffrey Epstein’s prostitution ring, AKA former professional hookers who are looking for a payday because their sugar daddy turned out to be a Mossad agent and it was a big news story, gave a press conference demanding more and more and more money.

Their claim is that although they were professional prostitutes, it was abuse to hire them for their services, because… I’m not really clear on the reasoning, frankly. Some of them are claiming that they were “miners,” but none of these women look like they’ve worked a day in their lives, let alone hard labor in the mines. I think these skanks would probably have a panic attack playing Minecraft as it is too close to actual work.

Hookers are the laziest people on earth. As a global rule, an hour with a hooker is approximately the cost one week of minimum wage (after taxes). So in most of the third world (excluding black countries), that’s somewhere between $40 and $100 USD. In America, it’s about $250. It’s good money. In fact, it’s insane money for a woman with no skills at all. Obviously, due to the nature of the work, they don’t work 40 hour weeks at that rate, but if they’ve got three four clients a day, in America that would be $5,000 a week, $240,000 a year. That’s without all the scams they run on their customers, getting extra money, gifts, college tuition, free cocaine, and on and on. A talented hooker can make a clean mil a year in the US, literally for laying on her back and pretending to be friendly. This is not what I would classify as a “victim.”

Of course, Epstein’s girls were in a whole other league, working for a shady Mossad billionaire, making ungodly amounts of money. But if there’s one thing I’ve learned about women, they will spend all the money they have, then do anything (and I mean anything) to get more money. So these hoes are now organizing to demand more money from Epstein’s estate, saying they were “victims” of their generous employer.

That’s all to be expected. Women gonna wom.

What was not expected is that the leader of these hoes is a straight up jungle-ass negress. She is the leader of the “disgruntled money-seeking retired hooker cartel” going around the media demanding the money.

I’m not surprised they put a black woman in charge. They’re most more aggressive and especially good at making demands. This is effectively an “I need to speak to the manager” type situation, and certainly that white bitch to her left giggling about the whole thing can’t go out there and act all angry that she didn’t get paid enough for her pussy. The road dog on the far right would likely be the second best demander-in-chief.

Anyway, I’m not saying that black bitch is bad. Honestly, I’d hit it – if she was 14! Not now, obviously. Black might not crack, but it does droop, if you know what I’m saying. I think you know what I’m saying.

Anyway, this is a really big revelation, that Epstein was taking a walk on the wild side and going jungle mode. I actually have even more respect for him now, and I already respected the shit out of the guy. He was a top boss. A real high roller. I’m not saying I agree with blackmailing everyone for the Mossad, but game recognize game, and Jeff was maxing it out. He was running guns and doing all kinds of other shit too, you know. He was a top boss.

I can picture me, Jeff, and DMX on a pimped out private plane running hookers to a secret location in the south of France. Me and X think it’s just a regular hoe job, and then I overhear Jeff on the phone talking with the Mossad and I alert X and he goes full Dog Mode when he realizes the Jews are running the whole thing. He pulls out his Glock and cocks it and then looks at me and I just nod and he throws me the Glock then pulls out another one and it’s just like:

We take over the plane and throw Jeff out, CIA style. X asks me: “dawg, I’m just wondering why you shoot a man fore you throwed him out da plane?” and I just give him a hard look and he just nods, as if to say: “Yeah. I feel ya, dawg. That’s some hardcore IRA type shit.”

Then we land with the hoes and tell the billionaire clients “we takin’ over this turf now, these hoes be run by the hood niggas and da Irish now. Y’all got a problem with dat?”

Then all those French pussies would just shake their heads nervously. Then me and X would run Epstein’s entire prostitution ring and turn his mansion in Manhattan into a legit trap house, and use the blackmail ring to control the US in the name of the blacks and the Irish.

]]>
Tucker’s Epstein Statements Prove He is Currently the De Facto Successor to Donald Trump’s Movement https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/08/06/tuckers-epstein-statements-prove-he-is-currently-the-de-facto-successor-to-donald-trumps-movement/ Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Author’s Note: I wrote this on July 21 and didn’t publish it because I meant to finish it. I never did finish it. It is being published unfinished so as not to waste it. I am aware of the recent big drama around Tucker, which I might write about. Or not, frankly. But however important that drama might seem to you, or whatever it means to you, it doesn’t affect the reality that Tucker is and will continue to be the natural successor to Donald Trump for the foreseeable future. 

Frankly, friends, today I wanted to write about how the message from Superman’s parents in James Gunn’s Superman by James Gunn, where his parents tell him to be evil, could have been from General Zod. That would make sense, as he’s the one living Kryptonian who would have the ability to fake that message.

But then I decided to write more about Jeffrey Epstein.

In particular, I wanted to address this “Mossad agent” concept. Obviously, he was a Mossad agent (or “asset,” if you prefer). But what exactly does that mean? What exactly is Israel?

Well. Let me start with Noam Chomsky’s claim that Israel is an outpost of American imperialism. This has been attacked a whole lot, as it appears that Noam Chomsky, who is Jewish, is trying t0 blame white Americans for the actions of Jews. I think that is obviously what Chomsky was trying to do. But the reality is that “Israel is an outpost of America” is actually true. It’s simply that it is an outpost of American Jews.

A famous German statesman said, writing about Zionism in the 1920s, decades before the Zionist state was established, wrote:

When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded goyim. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers

The prescience there is uncanny. It literally describes exactly what the Jewish state is 100 years after it was written. Most Jews do not want to live in Israel. The Ashkenazim, that is the European Jews, make up only 30% of the Jewish population of Israel. The other 70% of Israeli Jews are Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews, what could be called “Arab Jews,” who basically got forced to move to Israel because they were living in Arab countries and after the violence and brutality that came with the establishment of the Zionist state in the 1940s by Ashkenazim, Arabs started doing pogroms of their local Jewish populations, and the Ashkenazim that established the state of Israel paid them to come take refuge in their new Palestinian occupation territory.

There are fewer than 3 million Ashkenazim in Israel. Meanwhile, there are nearly 8 million in the United States. This is because the United States is where the money is. As the famous German statesman predicted, Israel exists not as a “homeland for the Jewish people,” but to give international Jewry a headquarters for their international gangsterism and the ability to act with state powers. Though it is a lesser issue, the man was also correct when he said Israel is a place for them to escape prosecution. Huge numbers of pedophiles have fled there, as have financial criminals. It is totally commonplace in Russia, or it was before Putin got hardcore after the start of this war, for Jews to do massive real estate swindles, collect hundred of millions or billions of dollars, and then flee to Israel with the money.

Israeli politics are not really controlled by Israeli Jews. This has changed slightly under Bibi Netanyahu, given that he is certainly a “great man of history” in that he is, by his own will, shaping the world in profound ways, and often pushing back against the whims of the American Jews who provide Israel with all of its money. Nonetheless, Israel is a project of American Jews. The Mossad is a state intelligence agency, of the state of Israel, because only a state can operate an intelligence agency. However, in practice, the Mossad is a sovereign secret service for international Jewry as a whole, rather than an organization designed to serve the interests of the state of Israel exclusively or even primarily.

Epstein got his money from American Jewish billionaires. At least the money that we can trace. Les Wexner, the Columbus, Ohio Jew who owns Victoria’s Secret and some other things, gave him an $80 million house in Manhattan and apparently other gifts and cash, and Leon Black gave him over $150 million marked as some kind of extremely unspecific “consulting” thing.

The bottom line here is that while Mossad was almost certainly the point of contact, because Mossad, being able to function as a state entity subject to no one, the operation was really much more about American Jews than it was about Israel as a state. Because again, Israel as a state is effectively a project of American Jews. It’s a kind of “Cobra Terror Drome” for International Jewry.

Hey, there I am talking about GI Joe after having started with General Zod in what is supposed to be a very serious article. You’ll have to bear with me. I have a brain tumor.

There is nothing particularly important going on in Israel. The create spyware, like the zero day one-click iPhone hack that Prince Muhammed used to get Jeff Bezos’ nudes from his iPhone, which would be illegal to produce commercially in literally every other country in the world. They do human experimentation on kidnapped Palestinians. And pretty much the rest of it is just diamonds. The way the diamond industry has been run, particularly in collaboration with South Africa, is another thing that would be illegal in most countries.

At TPUSA last week Tucker Carlson talked about Epstein using blackmail to get people to do the bidding of Israel. This is very true and very brave of Tucker Carlson.

It’s a bit like that clip in the Dark Knight.

Now that I watch it, that clip is actually as poorly written and dumb as every other part of those movies. What a strange thing, such beautiful films with such horrible scripts. Anyway, the point still stands: these Jews control the entire world, they run blackmail rings ensnaring all of the most powerful non-Jews, they do assassinations all around the world and have a lot of other less risky ways to completely destroy people’s lives (trust me on that one, lol). So to take a stand like Tucker is doing is incredibly brave, and he is an American hero, and I don’t care about any of the criticisms I’ve had of him. I mean, I’m sure those criticisms still stand, but taking on the Mossad like this, and not just on a podcast or a website, but taking it to the most mainstream conservative conference there is (next to CPAC) is incredibly brave.

I know there are theories about Tucker being “controlled opposition” because of his family connections and so on. But “controlled opposition” wouldn’t do that speech at TPUSA. We see what controlled opposition is doing: they’re talking about the poor innocent professional hookers that Epstein pulled out of the mines, or they’re talking about satanic human sacrifice cults (that are inexplicably not specifically Jewish in nature). Further, “controlled opposition” wouldn’t have done the Putin interview. I think Tucker’s UFO stuff is retarded and I still can’t believe he went along with Biden’s “Chinese spy balloon” hoax, but I think he is just maybe not super smart. Oh and his ads are completely out of control, especially given his existing wealth. (I’m a bit more forgiving with someone like Tim Dillon who never had any money, and also, Tim has fewer ads than Tucker, he’s now only doing one ad break in an hour, which is the correct amount. Also, Tim is much more clear that he’s just doing the ads for the money, where Tucker is much too earnest in selling scam products). Also, as a sinophile and the world’s biggest white proponent of sino-friendship, I had everything he says about China.

But seriously, forget all that. Calling out the Mossad like that and saying Israel controls the government at a venue like that is an incredibly brave action, and he absolutely is an American hero. I think some of his flaws might make him a less than ideal choice as the successor to Trump, but hey – give me a name. I’m not seeing anyone better. Maybe Dana White is better, but we really haven’t seen enough of Dana in political settings to know. We do know that UFC is all jungled up with one of the Emmanuel brothers, which is definitely not ideal.

Anyway, elections are not real in America. I think now everyone can see what I was talking about when I said “elections aren’t real but Trump will win this fake election because that is what is seen as most beneficial for the Jews.” Some people whined when I spent months before the election saying that, and I’ve been totally vindicated. No one has apologized to me. But that’s fine. After all, I’m just an internet personality, not a human being with feelings who would have his heart warmed by an apology. So it’s fine. No problem.

Because elections are fake, we’re talking more about a political figurehead than a presidential candidate, because you’re not going to vote your way out of this situation we’re in. (Plus, if we elected Tucker president, he would pause his inauguration speech every 15 minutes to tell you about a special offer at a crypto gambling website or all natural beef jerky.) Before there is any real change in America, there is going to have to be you know, whatever. Some kind of stuff. But people always need some figure to rally around, and this Epstein thing has pretty much sunk Trump. I’m a crisis management expert, and I know what I would tell him: unless you actually had sex with a girl under the age of 15, just release everything about Epstein and apologize for whatever involvement you had and blame the whole thing on the Mossad. But there is no way he is going to do that. If the girl was under 15, I don’t know what I would tell him to do. Honestly, I’ve thought about it a lot, and I don’t think there is an underage sex tape with Trump at all, and he’s scared of something else. Maybe he did something else illegal with Epstein, maybe involving money. He ran those casinos, you know, there were a lot of opportunities for shady stuff to happen. Or maybe he’s just old and being bullied by Netanyahu. Although, as I’ve said, Netanyahu would be savvy enough to tell him to just kick the can on Epstein rather than sending the Bimbo and the Pajeet Scammer out there to claim “nothing happened.” Even if it’s a prime directive to cover-up the Epstein thing, he could easily have said “we’re working on that, the investigation is still ongoing, and we want to make sure we have everything before we start naming names.” Then move on to some other distraction. This is so obvious it’s just completely insane that he had his people out there saying “it’s all a big hoax” and he’s now talking about “the Jeffrey Epstein hoax” and comparing it to Russiagate. Honestly, I can’t even believe it’s real.

Point being, I think Trump has almost certainly lost the base, and someone is going to have to fill that void of being the guy everyone looks to as “the leader,” because that is the way human brains work. We’re hardwired that way, biologically, and it isn’t going to change. “Leaderless resistance” is nonsense. Leaderless people are just sheep. Therefore, an imperfect leader is better than no leader. Trump has been better than no leader. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s actually not. For all of his flaws, Trump served as a point of organization for a festering white racial consciousness and hatred of immigrants, elite corruption, and weird gay shit. If Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush would have won in 2016, people would be quietly accepting all of this stuff, complaining on the internet and getting banned and then trying to figure out their personal lives, which are all complete disasters because America is a satanic cesspit.

Therefore, while I will continue to state my criticisms of him, Tucker Carlson is currently the obvious successor to Donald Trump. He’s never going to be president anyway. So he can at least fill the role of the figurehead directing the masses of people until someone much more radical who understands things much better comes along. But I’m not seeing any such person right now.

As brave as Tucker’s statements about the Mossad and Israel controlling the government were, it did not get to the heart of the matter, which is that this is not about the state of Israel. That is a big part of the mechanism of the whole conspiracy, but it is about “Jews, generally.”

It doesn’t mean “every single Jew.” It’s not every single Jew, at least not every single ethnic Jew (the Jew religion literally has as its foundation a rejection and hatred of Jesus Christ, so it is hard to really consider any religious Jew anything other than a self-declared enemy of White, Christian civilization, but Jews are at humans with souls, probably, so we can’t necessarily declare someone evil for being born with certain genetics). Maybe people like Jeffrey Sachs, Glenn Greenwald, and Dave Smith are not perfect, but they certainly are not on-board with the collective Jewish agenda. And sure, there are non-Jews involved. Epstein blackmail seems to explain why a lot of those non-Jews are involved. But there is also just general corruption and immorality that doesn’t necessarily need to involve blackmail.

But the underlying reality is that none of this madness in the West would be happening without the Jews, as the Jews are the planners and the primary drivers of all of these agendas. They’re not solely behind the endless wars of aggression against countries that pose no threat. Jews are the primary drivers behind mass immigration, feminism, atheism, basically every financial scam, the normalization of homosexuality, the legalization and spread of pornography, the coronavirus hoax, black radicalism and pro-crime policies, and on and on and on. There is nothing that you are against that isn’t caused by Jews. With the exception of natural disasters, Jews are behind every bad thing happening in the West. And even with the natural disasters, if we include forest fires in that category, I’m sure you could find Jews behind the ridiculous forestry policy of California (because Jews want to use the fires to push their global warming hoax).

Jews are behind everything. And what’s most important (and most incredible, really) is that it is all in public view. You don’t need anyone to release any documents to show that Jews are behind all of this. Jews often brag about it. Truly. Over 1,000 rabbis signed a petition saying “abortion is a part of the Jewish religion and banning it infringes on Jewish religious rights.” Even most normal people will admit that Hollywood, the news media, and the financial system are controlled by Jews. I think at this point most people have come to accept that Jews are the primary drivers of twenty years of war in the Middle East. Warmongering Ukrainian dictator Vladimir Zelensky is a Jew. It was 100% the ADL behind the internet censorship. OnlyFans and PornHub are both owned by Jews. The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) is the biggest open borders organization, and virtually every ostensibly secular open borders group is run by Jews (yes, for the sake of thoroughness and honesty, the Catholic Church has some people involved in that too, I know, but that is a drop in the bucket and also arguably a result of Jewish manipulation of the Vatican). Feminism as an ideology was invented by the Jews. So was virtually every other ideology, including communism and libertarianism (yes I know that there are a lot of well-meaning Christian libertarians and I agree with many libertarian positions, but as an ideology, it has been used as a weapon to empower massive corporations with deregulation schemes while somehow continuing to fail to stop regulations on normal people).

It’s literally everything and it is right there in everyone’s faces and all you have to do is notice that Jews are a group that is different than the other groups in this country. It’s easy enough for most people to talk about “black crime.” Everyone in this country is aware of it, whether they admit it or not. No matter how “liberal” a person might be, if they’re walking on the sidewalk alone at night and a group of negro youths comes towards them, they will cross the street. And Fox News and so on will just talk openly about “black crime.” Similarly, no one had a problem talking about “the Italian mafia.” And by the way, not everyone involved with the mafia was Italian. To be fair, the ones that weren’t Italian were pretty much all either Irish or Jewish, but that just further goes to prove the point about groups. And even though there were Irish and Jews involved in the mafia, it was still definitively an Italian organization. There is no reason we should not simply be able to recognize that Jews are a group that behaves as a group and their group behavior is overwhelmingly negative. Again, not every single one. No one is saying “every single one.” Not even that famous German statesman said that. That German statesman had a personal friend, his chauffeur, who was Jewish. His name was Emil Maurice. He was in the SS.

Jews would call him “a self-hating Jew.” Normal people would call him “a good person who happened to be born into a Jewish family.” No one can be deemed guilty over immutable traits.

So literally not even the Jews’ big baddie was saying “every single Jew. What people are saying, what I am saying, is that the character of the ruling elite in the United States, and the power that controls its vassals, is fundamentally and undeniably Jewish, and that this Jewish elite is hostile towards white people and towards non-Jews generally.

It’s good people are talking about Israel. That is a big, big step in the right direction. What needs to happen now is that people need to grasp the fact that what is going on in Gaza, this mass murder of innocent people, a genocide, is not the result of some vague “colonialism,” but rather a representation of the Jewish racial character, a character which ultimately stems from their hatred of Christ and the lack of repentance for murdering God.

Jews do have biological traits that make them more prone to this deviant behavior, because for 2000 years they’ve bred for these traits. Ashkenazi Jews have only a slight genetic relationship to the people of ancient Israel. The closest people, genetically, to the people who would have lived in the Levant at the time of Christ are Lebanese Christians, who are somewhere around 80% genetically descended from ancient Israelites. The Jewish group with the most genetic relation to ancient Hebrew people are the Mizrahi Jews, and that is about 50%, with the other 50% being Arab and Turkic. Greeks and Armenians share more genetic relation to the people who lived in Palestine at the time of Christ than Ashkenazi Jews. I say this to point out that rabbinical Judaism has functioned not as a system to preserve a bloodline, but as a cult to preserve the hatred of Christ. (Note: I did this research recently. Although I had done it before, my robot has been such a great helper that I was able to source this a lot better. I am now interested in looking into the Mizrahi Jews, who are a relatively small group, and seeing if they are less satanic than the Ashkenazim. Sephardic Jews are less satanic, I’ve researched that before, but they are only slightly less satanic. Sephardim maintained connections with the Ashkenazim, and were involved significantly in the Islamic conquest of Spain as well as the Turkic.)

This is where I stopped writing on July 21.

I meant to write some other things, but I forget them now. I will just write a follow-up, and explain whatever further thoughts I have on this matter. As I said in the above author’s note, I might write about the recent drama, or I might not, I have not made a decision. In terms of missing memes – I don’t know, man. I do this site as charity. Obviously donations have dropped since I stopped posting every day, and now it’s costing me money, and I’m just sort of wondering what I’m even doing here. I am sort of busy making money, because I’ve lost whatever romantic ideals I had, and now just want to see everyone die. Anyway, I’m not going to do anything I don’t feel like doing. I haven’t really been treated very well and I haven’t benefited from this website. It actually ruined my life completely and very few people could even bother to send me a couple bucks. Meanwhile, people who just copy-pasted all my material are charging $1200 a year to be in a group chat. I’m actually financially stable now, because it turns out people will pay me to write things.

I don’t care about America anymore. I want to see the death of my enemies, of course. But I am so totally muzzled. And I’m the only one. Everyone else is allow online now. Some people who copied all my ideas, word for word, and admitted it, are charging $1200 a year to join a group chat, using international processors to collect this abusive amount of cash. Yes, if I had access to money like that, of course I would keep writing this site all the time. But at this point, I’m an adult, with adult responsibilities, and I need to make money, and that isn’t happening here.

That said, I am working on some good projects which you will like. I might try to monetize some of them somehow. But unlike everyone else, I’m permanently banned from banking. So I really have to be offering something huge to get people to deal with crypto. I am writing a personal political book, which I think I will release for free because charing for political content is not something I believe in. I mean, if I could use payment processors, I would charge you $1200 a year to be in my group chat, because that is obviously just normal ethical business management. But I’ll just post the political book. The fiction though, I might post the first three chapters and then tell you to pay me or pirate it if you want to read the rest.

But in general, I have to get money somewhere else, and that is way more important to me than entertaining people who don’t even have the decency to send me $5.  I was not spreading the message. The site cannot spread. It is neutered, completely. It’s just the same people reading it, and it is a farm for people to use the content, edit it for their own purposes, and not pay me. As a random example not intended to represent real or fictional people, if I had thousands of people paying me $1200 a year to be in a group chat, I would send a few bucks to the guy whose ideas I copy-pasted to build my career. But people don’t think that way.

Basically, I could give a fuck and I could give a fuck less.

I hope the Chinese nuke America and literally everyone dies.

Anyway, whatever.

I do not want to whine. I just don’t know what people want from me. I see the messages. I don’t regret spending 13 years of my life on this project. I had fun. But life is such. Indeed, it is such.

But yeah, I’m doing a rebrand. I think people will like it. I think I’m going to be able to publish 2-3 books a month, while also doing the stuff I do now to make money. Which I can’t ever tell you about, but if you knew about it, you would think it was hilarious and awesome. It’s especially funny that I can only be paid in crypto or cash for thee jobs and the people hiring me are like “well…. okay.”

For the people wondering about what music I’m listening to while writing this, there is this band called Drugdealer (one word) that is sort of like a Steely Dan fan project that is really fun.

The guy is on par with the Lemon Twigs in terms of tributes to better times.

Sometimes he has women sing his songs for him and it’s really nice.

The dude sort of looks like a kind of TRT free Sam Hyde too.

Congrats to Sam Hyde on the comeback, by the way. It’s been an inspiration to me. I also support flipping that desk and think anyone who complains about it is a homo. If I was asked to give one piece of advice to young people, I would say: “just flip the desk, you might not get another chance, so just flip that bitch.”

I only listen to retro music. It reminds me that I wish it was the sixties and I wish we could be happy. But really, frankly, I just wish that something would happen.

It won’t happen though. It literally never does. That isn’t just a meme.

But yeah, maybe I’ll weigh in on the drama. I might as well. Everyone else is. I don’t really care much but I had a take I thought of when I was at the farmers’ market which is a lot better than anyone else’s I’ve seen.

The issue is, I just really don’t care enough to be motivated to write really anything on this website because I’m so overcome with boredom and apathy about the current internet right discourse.

]]>
“Epstein Client List” is an Unhelpful Bit of Terminology and Presumably a Misnomer https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/07/20/epstein-client-list-is-an-unhelpful-bit-of-terminology-and-presumably-a-misnomer/ Sun, 20 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000
A trove of sex tapes has been confirmed by government officials, but the “client list” is a conspiracy theory. You see how they do these games with words?

Eyyyy. Reporting on Epstein again. The Trump implosion and the Tucker Carlson “everyone in Washington knows America is controlled by Israel” speech got me fired up.

Firstly, a slight correction (not really a “retraction,” but a correction): when I said Epstein was prosecuted by the feds in the mid-2000s before being arrested by the feds in 2019 and charged with the same crimes, I was writing from memory, and was slightly (possibly consequentially) wrong. (Maybe my memory has been blown out, but it was six years ago.) In fact, it was a state conviction. However, part of his plea deal included a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the feds. I’m not a lawyer, and this is a very specific question, but my robot says that the NPA is not the same as a conviction and was only with the Florida district and therefore the 2019 arrest in Southern District of New York (SDNY) might technically have been legal. This would definitely have been the legal battle Epstein would have fought if the case had gone to court: he would say the NPA from Florida covered all federal districts and the SDNY would say it only covered Florida. According again to my robot, there is literally no precedent as to whether an NPA in one federal district covers other federal districts, so the arrest was certainly questionable and highly unorthodox, but maybe not illegal.

The reason this is relevant is that he obviously died in prison. Furthermore, it appears the feds wanted to raid his house and get the blackmail material from his safe. I still do not quite understand what went on there. My original assertion was that the most likely thing was that some people in American intelligence were not happy with the situation of the Mossad running this Epstein operation in the US, and attempted to thwart it, and somehow the Mossad organized the death of Epstein in federal custody. As I say often, my a significant part of job is to look at all of the information and then try to come up with the most likely explanations for things.

Even if the arrest was not technically illegal because there was no precedent and no one knows whether a federal district NPA holds up in all federal districts, someone in the US government organized a very strange arrest and the presumably someone else killed him in prison. Remember that also in 2019, American-based Jews were organizing color revolution style protests in Israel against Bibi Netanyahu. These protests became more extreme the next year, and continued until October 7, 2023. Bibi repeatedly publicly blamed George Soros for the protests.

You would think that arresting a top Mossad agent in the US would be related to attempts by US Jews to oust Netanyahu. It just appears that this would be obvious. Assuming that the reports were true, and the raid in 2019 uncovered a safe containing hard drives and CD-ROMs with videos of men having sex with underage girls, that trove of blackmail is a kind of “ring of power” type thing.

“Epstein Client List”

I wanted to address something related to the widely alleged claims that Epstein filmed all these rich and powerful people having sex with underage girls: at some point, someone came up with the term “Epstein Client List.” I do not understand the meaning of this piece of language and do not think it is helpful and think that in a strict sense, when Pam Bimbo said “there is no Epstein Client List,” she was being truthful. This slogan-type language leads to an ability for the government and others, potentially involved, to deflect.

If we break down this very popular term, which led to the very popular slogan “release the Epstein Client List,” we have no issue with the word “Epstein,” but both the other words – “client” and “list” – both seem inaccurate and useless.

First, “Client.” What does that mean? It is a person using the services of someone. This suggests that Epstein was a pimp, which is not what I think he was. He was a Mossad agent offering the service of allowing people to give video of themselves having sex with underage girls to the Mossad, which would then allow them to advance in their career, as they would be marked as a trusted person by powerful Jews.

Just a note here: I used the term “voluntary blackmail,” and some people found this concept confusing. It’s actually not confusing. You’ve all watched crime films that feature corrupt cops, right? Serpico is probably the most famous and maybe the best, but any film or TV show featuring corrupt cops has a scene where the cops are keeping a criminal’s money or taking a bribe and one of the cops wants to be “clean” and refuses to take the cash and the other cops freak out and say he has to take his cut. This is because if he takes the cut, they know he can’t rat them out, because he is a co-conspirator.

(I just spent ten minutes looking for the scene in Serpico where he refuses the money or the one where the other cop asks him “why didn’t you take the money, Frank?” and I don’t think either is online. Anyway, you can just watch the whole movie. It’s good. Though for the record, the real Frank Serpico said “Al Pacino did a great job playing Al Pacino but that’s not me.” I think he mostly meant the unhinged personality, rather than the facts. But for the source material, the book Serpico wrote is also very good and recommended.)

Along with corrupt cops, the old school mafia had the same rule, with members required to commit some crime, often murder, that everyone else in the gang knew about in order to advance in the organization (again, you’ve seen that over and over in movies). And of course the mafia made sure everyone was taking a cut of the criminal money so everyone was implicated in everything, even if they didn’t commit a murder. Meyer Lansky, the Jewish mafia accountant, reportedly said: “The best way to keep a secret is to make sure everyone who knows it is guilty too.”

It’s the exact same concept with Mossad jailbait sex tapes, this “voluntary blackmail.” Obviously, you’re not going to tell politicians and businessmen they have to commit a murder (nb4 “Pizzagate is real”), so you use sexual blackmail, which is very simple and straightforward: you just have the Mossad guy with the cameras in the sex room, you tell people “go see Epstein,” he sends them to the sex room, all of the sudden you’re one of the gang and doors start opening up.

This is just obviously what was going on. No rich person or politician is going to have sex with an underage girl at some obvious spy’s house just because they’re horny. If you’re rich and powerful, and you want to have sex with high school girls, you’ve got a lot of options as to how to accomplish this.

So, with the word “Client,” I suppose he was in a way offering a service, the service of submitting blackmail to the international Jewish cartel, but the word, in this context, obviously implies he was a pimp, which is not what he was. So I don’t think it’s useful.

Then the word “List.” Why would there be a list? He had a safe full of videos. And the claim is that he specifically took the time to write up a list of the names of all the people he had on video? Why would he do that? He would have to keep the list in the safe, because he wouldn’t want someone getting it, and the safe is already full of the tapes themselves.

This slogan “release the Epstein Client List,” allows for Pam Bimbo to go out there and say “there is no Epstein Client List,” and have it probably be technically true.

Remember that she had previously said that there were “tens of thousands” of videos of people having sex with “little girls.” James O’Keefe did his spycam thing on her and she told this to some random person at brunch. After O’Keefe emailed her and told her he recorded her saying it, she said it publicly.

Note that O’Keefe has entered “middle aged Irish decline,” a syndrome where, in middle age, Irishmen become overweight drunks. No, I’m kidding, you don’t have to note that. I noted it, but my instruction for you to take note of it was a joke. (I like James and I believe in brutal Irish nepotism and so defend him, but he does need to be aware of the drinking. I had to convince myself of that. It’s something we all must consider.)

The “Client List” concept is stupid and irrelevant. People should be saying “release the videos.” Obviously you would blur the girls, because the government can’t distribute child porn, and also fags and Indian scammers like Kash Patel claim that releasing the videos would “victimize the girls all over again.” But just blur them. We have the technology to blur out portions of video.

At the very least, someone at the FBI went through and identified everyone in the videos, so they can release the “list” of the names of the people seen in the videos.

People just need to be careful with these slogans. “Epstein Client List” was never a good slogan. Nor was “black book” a very good term. There’s a trove of sex tapes, we don’t need to be talking about obscure and seemingly abstract concepts for the sake of easy slogans.

I will say that “release the Epstein Files” is a better version. But then you have Michael Tracey saying “which files?” as if he can’t understand the concept that we want to know which specific individuals were on video having sex with underage girls. That is the primary issue of interest here.

Note:

Another Direction Here?

Here’s something else I’ve been thinking about and wanted to mention: I would wonder how much of this blackmail material would have been in Epstein’s safe, especially given that someone in the Mossad would have presumably known about the raid, given that US intelligence is crawling with Jews who are effectively double agents for Israel. Also, just generally, Epstein had already been arrested once, and he was not a subtle person, so it seems reasonable to assume that after recording the blackmail material, he would immediately hand it off to someone in Mossad, or some of the Jewish billionaires in America who were involved in this.

Like, think about this: if you raided the houses of Epstein, Les Wexner, and Leon Black, where would you be most likely to find the actual blackmail tapes? At least the majority of them? And even then, after the 2019 arrest, you would think either of those Jew billionaires would have had the tapes buried on some farm they own.

Fun fact: these rich people all have various secret Fallout-style bunkers on rural farms. You’re not going to find too much written about that, though you can find snippets (the biggest being the reports on Zuckerberg’s underground complexes in Hawaii), but I can just tell you it’s a matter of absolute fact. I wouldn’t expect anyone to take my word for that, but just think for a second, and try to imagine a scenario in which that would not be true. If you were a billionaire, would you have an underground shelter in some rural locale or no? Seems pretty obvious.

But you could also just bury it in a field. I mean, hiding a box full of hard drives is not really that hard.

The report that there are CD-ROMs with “young [name] with [name]” written on them implies there was at least some blackmail material in the safe. But if it was Bill Clinton or Bill Gates, is that really where you would keep it? In Epstein’s private residence? Of course, Epstein personally would probably want to keep copies, so it’s probable that at least some of it was on his property.

Regardless, closing the investigation is ridiculous. If the DOJ doesn’t have the blackmail tapes, or doesn’t have most of them, then you would expand the investigation.

Donald Trump’s Claim It’s a Democrat Plot

The thing that Donald Trump is running with is that the Democrats fabricated Epstein documents to attempt to smear him. But this would mean that Biden and the Democrats, in a race against Trump, had these files that were designed to damage Trump, and didn’t release them, and then just hoped that after Trump beat him in an election, Trump himself would release the documents without reading them. That does not make any sense.

If it was that simple, and Epstein was not Mossad but just a pimp whose services were procured by Donald Trump at some point, or if the Democrats faked files to make it appear that way, Biden could have just released the doctored files. Of course, Biden couldn’t release the files as Epstein wasn’t a pimp but rather a Mossad agent.

What Trump is saying doesn’t make any sense. Although I went through the possiblity that Trump did submit to blackmail in order to secure bailouts from Jewish financiers during his bankruptcies, my gut feeling is that this is not true, because if it was, why would he jump into the fire of becoming president? I think, again this is just my impression, Bibi Netanyahu, who has a stranglehold on Trump and the whole US government, ordered Trump not to release these tapes and documents, and now Trump is forced to go on this “just shut up about it” tour that makes him look guilty of sex crimes.

Here’s the thing: having sex with a “miner” is a much lesser offense than enabling the Israelis to continue to control US politics. If Trump were to say “yeah, I did the sex thing, sorry about that, but this is all a Mossad blackmail ring,” some of the more conservative/evangelical/white knight members of his base might be mad, but I mean, they tolerated the “grab em by the pussy” video, and is this worse? Because the girl might have been slightly under this (totally arbitrary) age of consent threshold? I did discover that in the state of New York, there is no statute of limitations on jailbait offenses, but I mean, is he going to go to prison over it? Epstein had 36 girls known by the feds and the Florida AG, and he got 13 months. I don’t really think this is very serious, and surely it would be overshadowed by the revelation that the Israeli government is using underage girls to blackmail the most powerful people in America, including the president.

CNN and NYT would spin it, but the whole issue here is that basically every one of Trump’s supporters is turning against him, the one exception I’ve seen being Charlie Kirk, and if he wanted to get out from under this, even if he is implicated, he could just dump the files, even if he’s in them, and call it out as Mossad. I think you would get a lot of “he’s not a perfect person and this was wrong of him to do, but it was brave of him to come clean.”

One thing is crystal: Trump cannot possibly get out of this situation he’s in without a very serious change in strategy. This is really spiraling further by the hour. I think it’s obvious that Pam Bimbo and that Indian scammer guy are acting on Trump’s orders, but regardless, at this point they need to be fired. This has all just been totally ridiculous. These people could have kicked the can, probably indefinitely, instead they decided to come out and say it’s all fake? Was that an order from Netanyahu and/or Trump? Because it doesn’t make sense as an order from Netanyahu. He’s a very good politician, and would know better. He would say “just don’t open the files,” and tell Trump to “kick the can and change the subject,” not send his people out to do press conferences saying the whole thing is a hoax. The way this has been handled is very bad for Israel, because everyone is talking about the Mossad now. At least on the right, obviously the Democrat media is just doing retard-tier salacious sex nonsense.

The claim that Jim Comey’s daughter altered the files is not really viable considering the way the government keeps records. There are still physical copies of everything. You can’t just go in and edit a MS Word file. But if she did that, that is a very serious crime would could result in life in prison, or at least multiple decades. She could be charged with sedition. If that happened, or if there is any remote suspicion that that happened, the files should be released and she should be called to testify under oath before Congress, and there should be a massive investigation of the FBI by… well, that’s a conundrum, isn’t it? Who do you call to investigate the FBI?

Personally, I would call the FSB, but I don’t think that would be a very popular solution.

[Note to editor: “miner” is a purposeful homonym joke, an ongoing bit about how out of work coal miners in Appalachia are being sex trafficked. I understand correcting it as I constantly accidentally do botched homonyms, but that one on purpose. Because for some reason alluding to the idea that these discussions are all about downtrodden coal miners getting sexually abused is really funny to me, probably because I’m retarded. Just leave this note.]

]]>
Trump is “Crashing Out” Over the “Epstein Files” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/07/19/trump-is-crashing-out-over-the-epstein-files/ Sat, 19 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000

It’s unclear to me whether Mr. Trump is refusing to release the Epstein files because Bibi Netanyahu told him not to or because he’s implicated in sex, potentially with so-called “miners.” What is clear is that he is “crashing out” over this issue.

These are both from earlier this week.

YIKES.

That does not look good at all. If he is just doing what Bibi told him, it still looks like he’s implicated. I guess it’s possibly both, as the primary reason that Bibi would have this kind of control is that he is implicated. The Jewish lobby has the ability to use political pressure to force Trump to do things like bomb various countries and send money and weapons to Jews for free. But forcing Trump to go out there and say that Epstein didn’t exist, that everyone who is asking about it is no different than the Russia hoaxers, is something on another level, which is much more personal.

Remember that the first time Trump told the media to just shut up about Epstein, he was sitting in front of Netanyahu.

I would not think that’s a coincidence.

Just to be clear, there are “Epstein Files.” It’s not a conspiracy theory that there are files. I saw some really bad takes from Michael Tracey about “Epstein mythology,” and he suggested that there were no specific group of “files.” Epstein was investigated and indicted by the feds and federally prosecuted and sentenced to federal prison. He was later arrested by federal cops and then died in prison. The government, it will not surprise you, keeps a lot of records. There would be tens or hundreds of thousands of pages of documentation recorded by the government about this guy Epstein. That is what people want released. Some of them have been released but a lot of them have not been released.

Whether or not there is an official “Epstein list” – a list that Epstein kept of his “clients” – I have no idea. There would be flight lists. Some of those have been released. But we all remember, or at least I remember, that when Epstein was arrested, it was reported in all media that they found a safe full of CD-ROMs labeled with people’s names, with the format “Young [name] with [name].” Those names have not been released. There were a bunch of hard-drives in the safe. It was, presumably, a whole bunch of videos of powerful people having sex with underage girls, and the government has all of this stuff. The New York Times reported in 2019 that Epstein kept this material to blackmail people.

So, it’s definitely not a “conspiracy theory.” Let’s make sure we don’t get lost here. The government has a lot of information on what certainly and definitely appears to be a “Mossad blackmail ring,” which involved people, presumably voluntarily, allowing themselves to be recorded having sex with underage girls.

That’s another point to be clear on: you would have to be retarded to do it just because you were horny. Prince Andrew appears to have actually done that, but he also appears to clearly suffer from mental retardation. Normal people who we would be talking about here would knowingly have illicit sex on video for the Mossad to keep so that powerful Jews would know they were loyal and give them promotions.

Obviously, not all blackmail is voluntary. For example, Trump’s son-in-law’s father, Charles Kushner, in 2004, sent a hooker to have sex with his brother-in-law when he was drunk at a bar and secretly filmed it and then threatened to show it to the man’s wife (Kushner’s sister) if he didn’t play along with some scheme relating to some kind of federal indictment Kushner was under. So there is secret blackmail.

However, whenever you’re talking about a “blackmail ring,” you’re talking pretty much exclusively about voluntary blackmail. Any kind of systematic blackmail is necessarily voluntary, as you are not going to set up a system of seducing people and tricking them into having sex on video. It has been a thing since forever that criminal gangs require someone to do some crime, such as murder, and then keep some evidence on them. It’s just common sense that if you have evidence of someone committing a serious crime, or something that would otherwise destroy their life, you’re going to trust them, because no such person is going to betray you.

Michael Tracey’s take, which is on some internet website, is total garbage. I also listened to like an hour of him rambling about it on a twitter podcast, and it was dumb. He is literally just being contrarian for the sake of it. Pointing out that the “he’s intelligence” quote from the Florida attorney general comes from Vicki Ward alone (I like Vicki Ward and don’t think she lies but yeah obviously you can’t build an entire case around that), or that Virginia Giuffre had some problems and was definitely trying to get money, or strawmanning with some silly QAnon shit, doesn’t serve to disappear the fact that the government has a bunch of files people want released and Trump is out there saying he won’t release them because they “aren’t credible.” The fact that people said some QAnon-tier stuff about Epstein doing child sacrifices in that temple on his island does not mean that there was not a safe full of hard drives and CD-Roms with people’s names on them, that the government has those materials and is refusing to say what names were there. We still have the fact that whose ever names were on there have not been prosecuted, even though the government has video of them having sex with underage girls, pulled from Epstein’s safe.

Okay?

This theory that it’s all a theory is stupid. And the only conceivable reason no one other than Maxwell has been prosecuted, the only conceivable reason the government would refuse to reveal any of this information, is that at least some of the very powerful people that we know Epstein hung out with are featured in these sex tapes.

Ask Michael Tracey why billionaire Jew Les Wexner “gifted” Epstein a $80 million New York house. I guess they were friends? So he gave him a eighty million dollar house? He dismissed the fact that Maxwell was the daughter of a top Mossad agent as “a coincidence.” Was the house also coincidental? If you asked Wexner why he gave him that house, would he say “it’s just a coincidence”? Why did Epstein have all this money? Where did it come from? Just people giving him things? That appears to literally be the answer, as his hedge fund was a complete disaster and did nothing but lose money. Leon Black, another Israel-obsessed Jewish billionaire, gave Epstein $158 million literally for no apparent reason. Literally, it was like “for services rendered.”

Anyway, Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s most prominent accuser famous for the photo with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell, was definitely after money (find me a woman who isn’t, huh?) with the series of lawsuits, and she might have had some problems, but she gets hit by a bus and the police refuse to come to the scene and then she kills herself a few weeks later? Do you guys know about this? It happened since I stopped doing the daily news, and I was going to write about it, then I was like “I don’t feel like doing that.” But she was living in Western Australia (???), which for those who do not know is very rural (the cities are all on the eastern side of the continent/country). Almost like she was hiding out. And I cannot find the method of suicide listed anywhere. Handguns are almost impossible to get in Australia, I would think especially as a non-citizen. So how did she kill herself? Strangle herself with a soft sheet pressed against a bunkbed like Epstein? Contrary to popular belief, it is actually really hard to kill yourself with pills. A grand total of 8% of suicide attempts using drugs or poison result in death! As it turn out, suicide without a gun is actually pretty hard to pull off. Did you know that 60% of handgun deaths in the US (yes, from the famous “handgun death” statistics) are not black people but suicide? The only other “easy” way to do it is with intravenous opioids, which would require you to know how to tie off your arm to inject them. Also, you can’t prove that’s a suicide, and probably a lot of US opioid deaths are suicide or de facto suicide (subconsciously giving yourself a bigger dose because you can’t take it anymore). But why are we even having this discussion? Why did the Australia police not say how she committed suicide? Is it a privacy issue? Why was the autopsy and toxicology not released? Privacy? For the single most prominent public individual in the biggest criminal case in the world right now?

Also, fun fact: 80% of suicides are men.

Another fun fact: Giuffre’s dad says she was murdered. He initially said he could believe the suicide then came out and said “someone got to her.”

But this case doesn’t hinge on her, and even if you believe Maxwell being the son of a top Mossad agent and Giuffre’s suicide are coincidences, we have all of these other questions, and if there are no questions, then why is Trump doing a world press tour whining about how he won’t release the government’s files and people should just stop talking about it immediately?

Anyway. That’s enough of that. Maybe I’ll write a full rebuttal to Tracey, but his current article doesn’t really give me much to work with, as it is just an assertion that there is no smoking gun that Epstein was a Mossad agent, but the smoking gun is literally the refusal to release the files. Another smoking gun is that in 2005 he was convicted in federal court of sex crimes including “child prostitution” with girls as young as 14 (there were a total of 36 confirmed underage sex partners), and was sentenced to 13 months in “prison” with “work release” meaning he could leave all day and just had to sleep at the jail. (I understand he was rich, but that is ridiculous, and the reason that even if Vicki Ward is the only source for the AG saying “he’s intelligence,” it makes very much sense. I looked it up and found that for the same crime in the same state, one guy got 20 years for two girls and another got 15 for one girl. In real prison. With no “work release.” Again, in the Epstein case, there were 36 girls.) It’s also a smoking gun that he was arrested for the same crimes he’d already been federally prosecuted and served his sentence for, and it’s never been explained how the feds were planning to try him again for the same crimes. The smoking gun is that no one on the videos is being prosecuted, that the feds are not demanding why Jewish billionaires Les Wexner and Leon Black explain why they were giving this guy hundreds of millions of dollars for free. There is a lot of smoke here and a lot of guns.

And Tracey’s “what files are we talking about?” is complete horseshit. “The files” are the government’s records. Questioning the validity of the “client list” concept means nothing. The government has a bunch of videos of some group of men having sex with underage girls, and they have files that say the names of these men. We want those files, Michael. The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos.

Obviously, anything that gets this big is going to have a lot of misinformation surrounding it, and there will always be things you can pick apart. It’s easy to be a critic and people feel very clever pointing out small wrong or questionable things and then saying that the other things are a coincidence. But saying “there’s no there there” about Jeffrey Epstein is deranged and Michael Tracey is deranged, and I now see people repeating this. By the way, I like Michael Tracey, and I don’t really think he is doing this maliciously, or because he’s an obsessive Trump-defender, I think he just really likes being clever and he’s gone full too clever by half with this one. It just looks dumb. But it’s a narrative that is out there now. So I just want to make sure we all know what we’re talking about here, that there is no confusion surrounding the fact that the government at least has a “list” of the men in the sex videos they confiscated from Epstein’s house in 2019 after his arrest for crimes he’d already been prosecuted for.

Back to Trump then: he knew Epstein when he was like, in his fifties, and already very rich. We see these pictures of them together:

When people used to post those pictures, I would think “yeah that’s whatever, they were two rich guys in New York, of course they knew each other.” Now, with his “stop talking about that or else” press tour, one has to wonder.

But the records show that Trump likely first met Epstein in the late 1980s or early 1990s. By the late 80s, Trump was already a billionaire.

So, would he want the Mossad to have blackmail on him? Well. I don’t know. He’s had a lot of financial problems since the late 1980s. His casinos went bankrupt. He had no personal bankruptcy, but he had six business bankruptcies. Obviously, the people who bailed him out were primarily Jewish. And it is certainly possible that he would say “okay, I’ll do a sex tape with a 15 year old” in such a situation. This would of course mean that Trump had been a de facto Mossad agent this whole time, which… I mean… I don’t know?

Part of the problem with this whole situation is that if Bibi were to send any supposed Trump jailbait sex tape to the New York Post or whatever, Trump could then just say “yeah, I did that for the Mossad to get bailed out.” As on this timeline the statute of limitations for any jailbait crime would be expired, it seems that this would be a lot more damaging to Israel than to Trump. I mean it would be embarrassing for Trump, but is it really that big of a deal?

Wait. I just looked it up and actually it says “there is no statute of limitations on child sex crimes in the state of New York.” But I don’t know what that means in reality. As far as anyone knows, Epstein never had girls younger than 14. There have never even been allegations of actual children in the classic sense of the word “children.” So… I mean is Trump going to die in prison over that? Would they be able to prove the age of the girl? I don’t know but even if he went down for this, using this blackmail, if it exists, would expose the fact that the US government is run by Mossad blackmail, which I think would be a much bigger revelation than that Trump had sex with a girl who was a couple years under age. Also, Trump can’t be prosecuted while he’s president, and he could just like, flee to Russia or something.

What I am seeing is that Trump is now very old. I’m getting “Joe Biden” vibes with this guy. Remember that Joe Biden was just bullied and pushed around and told to say things. This is why 80-year-old men should not run countries, particularly not big countries, and particularly not in times of crises. If Trump were still in his sixties, as he was when he launched his campaign, you could make things make more sense. But when someone is 80, really anything they do can potentially be explained as “well, he’s really old.”

Old people can be healthy. If you don’t smoke, drink, or do drugs, and you’re not fat, then your mind is going to degrade way before your body. It’s sad, frankly. I’m against euthanasia. But everyone’s faculties start to degrade at 75, particularly if they are a nonsmoker (smoking is not healthy per se, but it does actually slow dementia in old age), and sometimes, people are almost completely gone by their late 70s, and then live for another 10-15 years.

Doing these recent interviews, clearly under the stress of this Epstein thing – regardless of whether he did something or was just ordered by Bibi to seal it up, it’s stressful for him – he sounds very mumbly and angry.

I think this clip is AI. I don’t know, but I think it’s AI. But if it’s not, then wow, what a great example of what I’m talking about here.

He attacks his supporters – calling them “my supporters” – and says that he won’t forget those who are talking about Epstein.

I’m pretty sure that’s AI. We are already at that thing I was talking about happening for several years where you can’t tell if something is AI or not. Remember when I used to say that? Over and over again? That we were coming to a time when you won’t be able to tell if something is AI? Well, we are officially there. And I’m in it myself. I can’t help you.

Okay, wait.

This is apparently a real show and interview?

https://americasvoice.news/video/qSpyIEOB0ecSp25/

That video is embedded in a way that you can’t skip forward, which is a scummy way to force you to watch ads. It’s also not on YouTube or Rumble. Also, that entire site could be fake and everything on it made by AI?

How are you supposed to confirm anything now? Honestly, I have no idea, and I am pretty sure it’s what I said it would be: you have to have seen it yourself or talk to someone you trust who saw it.

I think at this point, if Reuters or AP says “Trump said…”, you can consider the quote real, but I don’t know how much longer that will be true. Furthermore, if you’re working at Reuters or the AP and Trump does an interview with an obscure podcast and you can’t figure out if it’s AI, you might just not report on it. There doesn’t appear to be any report on this.

I’m listening to this alleged interview now, I’m at the Trump part. He is saying all of this stuff. He sounds like he’s about to start crying, saying people should stop talking about Epstein. He brought it up immediately at the beginning of the interview.

“Real America’s Voice” has a Wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_America%27s_Voice

But someone could have vandalized Wikipedia with this. No one can really prove this doesn’t exist. It has a website. Who can even say what “real” means at this point? I guess in this specific case, it’s a question of “did Trump, in reality, call this podcast and say all this stuff on this tape I’m listening to?”

I’m about ten minutes in at time of writing. After opening with Epstein he’s on to a bunch of bullshit I don’t care about – tariffs and Jerome Powell and whatever. That makes it seem real. Maybe the clip above is fake. I’ll tell you when I get there. But the whole thing could be fake. AI could not just do his voice, but write a script where he rambles about international trade before saying the wacko Epstein thing.

FIFTEEN MINUTES LATER

Okay, I finished the interview.

In all seriousness, the interview is real. I initially thought that clip had to be fake, because he threatens his own supporters, literally saying:

All my supporters want to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. It’s unbelievable … It’s a disgrace and I remember, I’m gonna remember every one of these guys, they’re my supporters and they just, they love it, they love it, and it’s, it’s all induced by the Democrats. The Democrats are the ones who are getting them to say this stuff. And the files are all setup by the people who ran it for the last four years … but I’m gonna remember people that, that took us away from this, instead of talking about this flawless attack on nuclear weapons that took place in Iran … that’s what we aught to be talking about, not nonsense.

He is borderline incoherent, and sounds really, really old. He actually sounds drunk, but I believe his story about how he never drank ever. I don’t think he’s drinking.

I have recently seen some really good AI stuff done with really cheap apps, and I thought that was so bad it had to have been fake, but no. It was reported on by the media. That guy interviewing him, John Solomon, I guess works for Steve Bannon or something, I don’t know. But yeah it’s a real interview and that is how he talks now and he’s completely obsessed with being mad at people who talk about Epstein. Clearly, his feelings are hurt that his supporters are abandoning him over this. But wow, the solution is not to threaten your own supporters, man. That is not good.

Speaking of solutions, Pam Bimbo just announced she is requesting the release of “some” of the Epstein files. Well, we already have some of the files. We specifically want:

  • The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos, and
  • Any information about intelligence connections, foreign and/or domestic

Note that the intelligence “connections” (all of this stuff is backroom and informal, intelligence assets working undercover get paid in cash, or billionaire Jews just give them free money for no specific reason) would likely be both domestic and foreign, i.e., he was working for the Mossad but also given some type of confidential informant status by the FBI.

Along with those two main things, and those are the two main things, it would be nice to know what investigations were done into Wexner and Black for giving this guy tens of millions. I don’t think “helping out a friend” explains it. Maybe if you’re a billionaire, you help out a friend with a few hundred thousand or even a couple million, but between Wexner and Black, Epstein was given over two hundred million dollars.

Further, I want the files on why and legally how he was arrested in 2019 for crimes he’d already been convicted of and served prison time for. I remember when he died, some people in the media talked about this, and claimed that these were separate jurisdictions (Florida and then New York) and that this meant he could be tried for the same crimes twice. That isn’t true. You can’t be charged in different federal courts for the same crimes. There is something called “dual sovereignty” which is really a violation of the Fifth Amendment but that allows both state and federal charges for the same crime, but two federal courts can’t charge you for the same crime as the federal government has a single sovereignty.

Frankly, there is no reason not to simply release all of the files. It is, in fact, insane that this is even an issue while we are being told “there is no there there.” With the Kennedy files, you have all kinds of potential “classified” material that they can claim is too “sensitive” to be released as it could “compromise national security.” There are all sorts of security protocols around the president that are a secret and therefore “sensitive,” and then if the government had investigated Russia or Cuba or whatever, all of that would relate to “national security.” I’m not saying that is a valid reason not to release the files, especially sixty years later, but it is at least a theoretical reason. If Epstein is just some guy who was having sex with young girls and that’s the end of it, there is literally zero reason that all of this information could not be released publicly, with the one exception maybe being some of the stuff about the investigation into his death as that at least happened in a federal government building meaning “classified stuff.” Everything else should be public. He’s already dead, so he can’t complain about his privacy, and it is obvious that this is a matter of public interest, so what is even the potential reason for keeping any of the government files a secret?

Obviously, we all understand the reason. But why doesn’t Trump have a better excuse? What he said, even before the election, is that Jeffrey Epstein knew a lot of people so a lot of people’s names are in the files and that doesn’t necessarily mean they are actually guilty of anything. But we already know who most or maybe all of these people were. Bill Gates, Alan Dershowitz, Steven Pinker, that guy who made the Simpsons, and on and on, have already been named as having some kind of social connection to Epstein, and it was public knowledge for most of these people. Epstein was holding big social events in New York and Florida with all kinds of people. Along with procuring underage girls for sex, he was a socialite, hence the fact that all of these famous people are photographed with him. I’m sure not all of them had sex with underage girls, so it’s not a reasonable excuse that some innocent man’s name is going to be tarnished because government documents show that they were at one of Epstein’s parties.

Bill Gates did an interview saying that he knew Epstein had been in prison for underage girls and still chose to be friends with him and go to his parties and there were no consequences for him. He did not get “canceled.” Several other people have been questioned about it and just said “yeah, sorry” and nothing happened. Dershowitz admitted to getting multiple massages from girls who “looked over 18.” And he’s a person who has actually written about the age of consent being stupid and was one of Epstein’s lawyers in the Florida case. And he didn’t get “canceled.” He’s still out there doing prominent interviews. Just the other day he was on that show of those guys who took Rush Limbaugh’s timeslot explaining that Epstein was not involved with the Mossad.

So unless the files say “video shows this person having sex with a girl who appears to possibly be under the age of consent,” then nothing is going to happen if someone’s name shows up – including Trump’s, by the way. We already have these pictures of Trump with Epstein and interviews where he’s saying they’re friends. He even implied directly that he knew some of the girls were underage.

In a tape released as an election surprise last year (it got very little media coverage for whatever reason), Epstein, on a 2017 tape, says he was Trump’s “best friend for ten years.”

Given that Epstein was indicted by two different federal jurisdictions, there would be a whole lot of paperwork, including a whole bunch of interviews, so it would actually be more or less impossible that Trump’s name wouldn’t be somewhere in the documents. I don’t see how his name being mentioned in some file would be more harmful to him than the photographs and various statements that are already on the public record. Unless it says “Trump, featured on a video having sex with a teenage girl who may be under the age of consent…”

Yes, Leftists are Talking About This

Trump is correct when he says Democrats are talking about this Epstein thing. It’s all over the Democrat media.

The issue is that that doesn’t mean anything. It would be bizarre if they were not talking about it. Of course they are talking about it. They are obsessed with Trump sex scandals. And of course, the Jews out there talking about it know as a matter of fact that Trump isn’t going to come out and say “Epstein was Mossad,” so there is no reason for them to not talk about it.

In fact, if I were a Jew, I would want to talk constantly about how Trump is stopping the release of the files because he had sex with an underage girl, as that redirects people from pointing out the fact that Trump first told people to “shut up about Epstein” while in a meeting with Bibi Netanyahu, and that the implication of all of this is that Epstein was Mossad. I watched a bunch of clips from CNN and so on talking about Trump-Epstein, and none of them talked about Epstein being a possible Mossad agent. It’s all just sordid sex drama, which is not relevant to anything.

Trump is actually arguing that because Biden didn’t release the files, he shouldn’t be expected to.

Weird argument, but okay.

Ultimately, it doesn’t really matter whether or not Trump did have sex with an underage whore or if he’s just being bullied by Bibi. The effect is the same, which is that the media is covering up the fact that the Mossad was running a blackmail ring in the United States.

This obviously isn’t going anywhere. Apparently, it is going to turn Trump’s people against him much more than bombing Iran did. At least during this lag between the bombing and the inevitable war, that is the case. In general, these wars in the Middle East have been such a feature of America for so long, it’s just background noise. But Epstein, for whatever reason, is something people were really mad about. I guess the reason is probably that people don’t like the idea of a group of elites being above the law. I’m not really sure. Maybe some of it is white knighting for literal hookers. Probably a significant amount of it is more fringe QAnon type reasoning.

Honestly, from the “Trump base,” I don’t see a lot about Mossad. More Israel talk is creeping in now. I recently saw a clip of Matt Gaetz saying Mossad killed Epstein in prison by working with their assets in the US government. But mainstream right-wing criticism of Israel and Jews is something relatively new. I’m not really sure about the original obsession with Epstein from people who don’t think he’s Mossad.

Regardless of the reasons, people are really mad at Trump about this, and with the way he is handling it, things are clearly going to get worse for him in terms of backlash from his supporters. But it doesn’t matter. The US is going to war with Iran and AOC will be the next president and people will get whatever comes with that.

Trump will at least try to pump the economy.

I mean, did you guys see Bitcoin? Shit be flying.

So yeah, it’s fine. Whatever.

Just don’t expect anything to happen, because it’s definitely not going to. Even the war with Iran won’t really feel like it’s “happening.”

I guess the AI thing is going to be something like something happening. As mentioned above, we are already in the world of “there is no possible way to tell if this is real.”

A couple weeks ago I ran across this Twitter account and thought for a second the guy was hiring actors for his memes:

I realized it was AI. But that is just a small Twitter account that is just using the raw prompts of what is presumably some $10 a month software.

He just posted a new one. These are actually really good.

We got another floating microphone there, and he’s not fixing the text (which for various reasons still confuses AI in images). If he would edit, you literally would not be able to tell it is AI. And in six months, the raw prompts will be enough for it to be indistinguishable from real life.

It’s sort of hilarious to think that in a year or so, something like the Superman movie, which they spent $300 million on, will be possible with $10 a month software. Even more hilarious will be the insanity that ensues in the period where people can’t tell what is real and everyone gets all confused about everything before eventually the human mind begins to understand that video doesn’t reflect real life.

I’m not really sure where it will go in terms of the social impact, but this is a big shift. We’ve gotten used to video representing real life. But people will somehow deal with the fact that it doesn’t. People don’t like to feel stupid, like they’ve been tricked, so people will all get tricked a few times and find out they were tricked and then start assuming everything is AI. If the Jews would have waited a couple years to begin their genocide, they probably could have convinced most people that these insane genocide videos we’re seeing are AI.

I guess what will probably happen is that people will just believe things are real if they agree with them and say they’re fake if they don’t agree with them? That seems most likely. But there will definitely be more fake video than real video, on the whole.

If people want to get into making fake videos, I would recommend that you primarily focus on making outrageous shit that promotes the other side. For example, make videos showing IDF soldiers helping Palestinians in absurd ways. Like, “Israeli military holds carnival in Gaza for Palestinian children, gives everyone free cotton candy and funnel cakes.” Or a news report on Russian soldiers throwing Ukrainians into a cage with an eagle and a bear. “Russian soldiers are seen forcing Ukrainians to take off their shoes and throw them in a big pile.” Whatever ridiculous, unbelievable shit you can think of that in theory supports your enemies but is too ridiculous to be believed rationally. Either fake enemy propaganda, or just total chaos. Total chaos is also good. Just invent events that don’t make any sense or are outrageous and incendiary.

You can also just do fun/funny stuff. But this is going to be complete madness, and it’s really here now, but in six months you will really start to see serious fallout. CNN and the rest of these people are going to do reports saying “you can only trust video from us,” and people will be like “lol.”

But yeah, the fallout from AI video, which will include the total end to all extant professional entertainment media as everyone will just be able to make whatever they want, but also including some kind of massive social crisis, the biggest reality collapse we’ve seen, is the only interesting thing I see on the horizon. Everything else is very predictable and boring.

Sorry.

]]>
Okay, I Understand the MAGA Normie Obsession with Epstein Now https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/07/19/okay-i-understand-the-maga-normie-obsession-with-epstein-now/ Sat, 19 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000
Donald Trump, pictured with the normal number of fingers showing a new type of gun to his supporters who won’t shut up about Epstein

I wrote a way too long thing about the Trump-Epstein drama yesterday. People said it was too long, I thought it was too long. Previously, I would have written that as multiple articles. But I didn’t feel like doing that yesterday.

Anyway, in the article, I mentioned that I didn’t really understand the MAGA obsession with the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, because most of them are not talking about Israel-Mossad. That is the reason that I’m obsessed with Epstein, because I’m obsessed with Jews, so it wasn’t clear to me why people who, at least until the last six months or so, were avoiding the Jew issue would be obsessed with Epstein.

I mentioned that some of it was probably QAnon-related, and that is the total explanation. I got many responses to that article explaining to me that the MAGA obsession is related to the Epstein Island Temple, and the belief it was used for human sacrifice. This is all part of a satanic elite conspiracy that is related to Pizzagate and so on. That is the claim and the reason MAGA people who do not talk about the Jews are fixated on Epstein.

Okay. So, let me comment on that.

Firstly, I attacked Michael Tracey for talking about “Epstein Mythology,” and I think this “child sacrifice in the Moloch temple” is what Tracey had in mind when he was making that claim. So it seems that these claims do turn some people off of looking at the much more documented and obvious Mossad issue.

But what about the child sacrifice allegations? What about the $100,000 in cement that the Daily Mail (that is the primary source) claims Epstein had shipped to his island weeks before the release of a 2018 exposé on him? If it was just about Mossad blackmail, why did people keep going back to the island?

Firstly, there isn’t any solid proof of this human sacrifice thing. The best evidence was from the Pizzatgate scandal. That whole Pizzagate thing spun out of control, but some of those instagram posts, the stuff about the Podestas, the very strange coded language in the Hillary emails… it definitely raises a lot of questions. I’m not going to go through all of that right now, but people can look it up, I covered it at the time pretty extensively.

On the other hand, it obviously sounds fantastical, and a person could dismiss all of this as just a group of weirdos. I guess. I mean, there isn’t any “proof” of these allegations, just a lot of evidence.

Gun to my head, I would probably say that there is some kind of “True Detective” style satanic pedophile child sacrifice thing going on in elite circles. Although I will note that that would, among other things, make more aggressive blackmail than sex with girls slightly under the age of consent. Like I said last time, if Trump agreed to be blackmailed by having sex with a 15 year old on video to get bailed out when he was going bankrupt, he could in theory just admit that, because it would have been decades ago and pretty hard to prosecute. If you’re on video doing some kind of satanic human sacrifice in an underground temple, well, you can’t really ever admit to that, can you?

Anyway, I’m not against people thinking this. I think QAnon got stupid and out of control, but it was clearly manipulated into getting out of control, presumably to get people to dismiss whatever was going on with Pizzagate. You probably lose me at the adrenochrome thing. But then this went into tunnels under Walmart, literally everyone in government and entertainment being a literal satanist, and then the most extreme of the group was claiming that Trump was still the secret president when Biden was president and that any minute he was going to jump out from behind a curtain and have the military execute everyone in the government, Oprah, Bill Gates, and many others. It got real wacky.

We can’t prove anything about satanic cults and if you thought Trump was going to release documents about an elite satanic human sacrifice cult, you’re retarded. That’s not happening. He’s also not going to release anything about a Mossad spy ring, whether or not he is in the files or not.

The bottom line is that the Mossad issue is much more obvious and much more documented than anything about a satanic human sacrifice cult. It’s a lot easier to talk about the Mossad than “True Detective season 1 was based on a true story.” Also, it is clear that the “satanic cult” stuff has been used to distract from the Mossad thing. If there was a satanic human sacrifice temple on Epstein Island, it was still run by the Mossad, right?

I mean, human sacrifice is a longtime part of the Jew religion. Judaism is a satanic cult that has been documented kidnapping and doing human sacrifice on children for centuries. So it would all be a Jewish thing. In my opinion, the Jewishness is what people should be focusing on here, as it is really on the edge of breaking through into the mainstream consciousness. For the belief that the elite are involved in satanic human sacrifice you’re going to need… some really serious proof. And even if there was proof, I don’t know that most people would actually be able to process that sort of thing, as it is just too weird.

Tucker Carlson just said at Turning Point USA that Epstein was working for the Mossad and his blackmail is the reason the US government is being directed by Israel.

This is very hardcore, and it is happening.

Tucker is the biggest personality in the entire right-wing and the biggest in the world as a whole. Maybe Joe Rogan gets more clicks weekly, but Tucker has done all the most watched interviews and Tucker is definitely a lot more beloved than Rogan and he is saying the whole thing, right there, out loud, at the most mainstream possible venue.

It’s happening. The thing I have worked for, sacrificed my life for, is finally happening. The “antisemitism” hoax has collapsed, we are talking about Jews running America in the mainstream, and it is only a matter of time before people ask the most important question, which is: “hey if these Jews did all this, and they lie about everything, what about that thing they said happened in Germany in the 1940s? They made laws you’re not allowed to ask about it, maybe we should give that whole thing a look.”

So, no.

I’m not going to promote the idea that people should be out there talking about satanic child sacrifice right now. Get America to accept that we are under a Zionist Occupation Government managed through backroom deals, including sexual blackmail. Get them to look at the Jews as a foreign power controlling our entire society. Focus on that. Then, if there is some kind of True Detective thing with the Pizzagate stuff, we can start to look at that. Once people accept the Jewish problem, we’ve already won, and everything else is going to be cleanup. When Jews are out, you can get the documents, you can get a full investigation of Epstein Island, you can investigate Comet Pizza, you can do whatever.

Just let me summarize and stress the bottom line: yes, I agree, it does look like, more likely than not, at least some of the really dark stuff is real. I agree. But if it is real, it’s a Jewish thing, and you’re definitely not going to get the government to go along with investigating satanic human sacrifice cults without exposing the Jews first. And there is no possible way you could ever hope to expose something like a satanic human sacrifice cult without the government doing the investigation. Right? So let’s just focus on what we have right now, which is a total unraveling of the privileged status of the Jews, which is going to lead to demands that Jews give up their stranglehold on the country, which is going to lead to a government run by normal Christian Americans, and that government would be able to do the investigation into what exactly the coded language about pizza and hotdogs in those Clinton Wikileaks emails was referring to.

Does that make sense?

What I do not want to see right now is a slide away from what Tucker Carlson just said at Turning Point into endless talk about ritual pedophile human sacrifice claims no one can prove. No one has to prove Jews control America, you can literally just point to them. This is very easy and people need to keep their eye on the ball.

Do not get sidetracked. The number one thing the Jews want right now, I assure you, is for the internet right to take this Epstein thing and start talking about secret elite satanic cults, because they know that even if that exists, most people won’t believe it and it discredits people talking about Jewish dominance and it could potentially result in a derailing of the Jewish exposure project.

Look at the way the left media, CNN, New York Times, the whole media establishment, is currently talking about Trump-Epstein. That is also a big distraction. They’re making it a lurid sex thing, which is really totally irrelevant, because all of this sex drama is just slop for goyim. It’s the same thing they did when they made the Epstein thing about “oh these poor innocent hookers, they were only 16 and they were such pure and innocent professional hookers.” They distracted completely from the Mossad blackmail issue, and they’re doing it again by making it about Trump. It is about Trump because Trump is the US president and he is totally obsessed with serving Israel. But whether he’s in the files as a jailbait sex perp or not, it’s about Israel.

Eye on the ball, guys.

]]>
Dear MAGA: If You Think Masked ICE Thugs Wouldn’t Do the Same to You, You’re Dumber Than You Look https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/07/11/dear-maga-if-you-think-masked-ice-thugs-wouldnt-do-the-same-to-you-youre-dumber-than-you-look/ Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000

It’s NEVER a good idea to resist ICE agents.

Can you say FAFO? pic.twitter.com/3zArK2T25y

— AmericanPapaBear (@AmericaPapaBear) June 29, 2025

A lot of people on the internet are celebrating and cheering on some pretty brutal videos of ICE grabbing Mexicans out of parking lots, out of Walmarts, wherever. It’s understandable. I understand and my instinct is to celebrate it as well. And I would be celebrating it if I knew less about the situation than I do.

Please, allow me to explain why I’m not celebrating it.

Let’s start with just how uncomfortable I am with the cops. The Big Beautiful Bill is turning ICE into the biggest federal cop group in American history. Their budge is going to go from $10 billion to $100 billion, a budget that surpasses the combined budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and the Marshals Service.

Note that there has never been a case of a federal cop group shrinking. In theory, ICE should have a temporary mission, correct? They should be rounding up the immigrants, processing them in holding centers near the border, then shipping them back to wherever they came from. (In certain cases, sending them to some third country might make sense, but because they all came through Mexico, that third country should be Mexico. It was Mexico that made the decision to let these people walk through their country into our country, and while I understand that this was under pressure from the Biden administration, all that really means is that the US is capable of asserting enormous pressure on Mexico.)

But there is no “once the mission is complete, ICE’s staffing and funding will be drastically downsized” clause in the BBB or anywhere else. This is a standing army, trained to run around the country throwing people into vans, without warrants. If you think “JD Vance” is going to win the 2028 election, you have no understanding of what is happening in this country. Apparently, the reasons Democrats will take over in 2028 are something that need to be explained in some detail, something that is beyond our scope today. But Democrats will control the federal government in 2028, SCOTUS will not get in their way, and they are not going to do disband a massive federal cop organization, but instead use it for their own purposes. If we want to get an idea of what they will do with these cops, perhaps we should recall Waco and Ruby Ridge, then imagine that sort of thing happening everywhere, all the time.

Another fact that is rather important in my view is that most of these people we see being arrested are not being deported at all. The BBB does nothing to address the laws that make it virtually impossible to deport 98% of illegal immigrants. Getting rid of the laws that prevent deportations should and would be the first move of anyone who was even remotely serious about deporting tens of millions of people. Among other things, you would expand expedited removals, end “credible fear” interviews for “asylum seekers,” and defund immigration courts. This could all be done by Congress.

Of course, the idea of tens of millions of people via mass roundups is completely nonsensical on its face. No one knows the actual numbers, but after the 20+ million who likely came in under Biden, we are definitely talking about somewhere in the range of fifty million illegal immigrants we want to remove. You are not going to pick them up one at a time in the Walmart parking lot. You don’t need to be a math genius to understand this, and I don’t need to tell you “how many football stadiums is 50 million people?”

What you would do is start seriously punishing people who hire or rent to illegal immigrants. You would fully implement E-verify, to ensure people who work and rent are legal residents, the you would send ICE to round up the tens of thousands of people who are employing and renting to illegals and charging them with ten years in prison for each instance. You would then set up ICE-run “no questions asked, just sign the form and we’ll give you $1000 in cash and put you on a bus back to Mexico or on a flight to wherever” voluntary deportation centers in every major American city and provide a hotline for the immigrants to call explaining how they can make their way out.

If they can’t legally work and they can’t legally live anywhere, all of the sudden you have an exodus. What can they do? They have to leave. Then, instead of endless videos of masked me grabbing screaming women in church parking lots and throwing them into vans, you’d have endless videos of immigrants lining up and boarding single-file onto buses bound for Mexico.

Im sure it’s possible to argue that some of the immigrants would refuse to leave even if they could not work and had to live on the streets. But it’s not going to be very many of them, and those ones could be thrown in vans. They’re not going to be hard to find.

Tens of millions of people have been relocated before. The most obvious example to point to is the partitioning of Pakistan. That project used carrots and sticks, but it did not round millions of people up, throwing them in cans one at a time, sending three officers to arrest a single individual.

How long does the arrest take, if we include drive time and paperwork? How much are these ICE people being paid per hour? This all starts to become reminiscent of “Holocaust math,” no?

Far from moving to arrest the employers and landlords of illegals, which I suspect many in the Trump administration would view as antisemitic, Trump has not even managed to cut off illegal immigrant access to all of the free social services.

Even if you are not big on math and are a true believer in the “one arrest at a time” strategy, the problem now is that ICE has already cleaned out the “100 miles from the border” of the immigrants who have been here less than two weeks (those are the only people eligible for expeditited removal), and now these people are just being interned indefinitely as the courts prevent deportation. Yes, the Trump administration is making a big show pushing back on the courts, Stephen Miller is saying they don’t have the authority, but whatever the details of that battle might be, most of these people being detained by ICE are no longer being deported and are instead being sent to detainment facilities. Meanwhile, there is not even a discussion of using the Congress to pass laws stripping courts of their ability to prevent deportations. The United States federal court system is still able to enforce international refugee treaties (HIAS and others successfully challenged Trump’s EO on the matter in court), and instead of using the Congress to get rid of these treaties, Trump sends Miller to argue with the courts about what they mean.

Just Send Them to Black Sites, Indefinitely?

This “Alligator Alcatraz,” where MAGA patriots plan to eat delicious bread while watching Mexicans being eaten alive by large lizards, is a “black site.” That is, it is a prison camp where people are held indefinitely without access to due process. Just to be clear, no, it does not have to be secret to be a “black site.” Guantanamo Bay, where Trump is also sending immigrants instead of deporting them (he’s allowed to do this because Gitmo is technically US soil), is the world’s most famous prison and is also, definitionally, a “black site.” That said, it is certainly often a feature of a black site that you do not know where it is, and if you imagine that the federal government is not using this current circus atmosphere to build these sites across the country, you are as innocent as a babe or as stupid as an ox who’s suffered severe head trauma.

If the illegals could simply be deported in an efficient manner, you would not have any reason to build new black sites. So there is one more reason the state has for not successfully deporting illegal immigrants. That’s on top of the fact that all wealthy donors are against mass deportation of illegals.

Along with a brand new army of fully militarized federal cops trained to drive around the country and disappear people into vans in broad daylight, these black sites are another thing that the Trump Administration will be gifting to the AOC administration when James “Vance” Bowman loses the 2028 election.

I’m sure the Democrats will campaign on abolishing (or at least restricting) ICE and closing the black sites. And I’m sure people will believe it because of the long established Democrat tradition of telling the truth and never using federal cops for immoral purposes.

The most important gift Trump will give to AOC will be an AI police state control grid run by Palantir, so that the government will be able to keep close tabs on racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, and most importantly of all, antisemites.

Will the Democrats use this series of gifts to identify, arrest, and detain all the people viewed as a threat to democracy? Of course, I have no way of predicting such a thing, all I can do is say that it would be very easy to do, given these incredible gifts Trump will be giving them, and could be done legally with a simple emergency declaration which could be declared for more or less any reason.

Here’s an interesting question: how many people would need to be disappeared into some cage in a swamp in order for any ability of a meaningful American resistance movement to ever be formed to be crushed? We know that the Palantir system will be able to identify them, and I would suspect the number is lower than 2500. It could in fact be much lower than that, given that a fully functioning controlled opposition movement already exists, and most people would prefer to follow a pied piper offering them some joyful fantasy than look upon the dark realty of what is actually happening in front of their eyes. A quick perusal of the ridiculous popularity of the QAnon movement should be enough to demonstrate the ability of people to put their faith in nonsense, and most of the controlled opposition movements are nowhere near as ridiculous as QAnon.

Personally, I think these street scenes of ICE agents grabbing people are being created to desensitize people to seeing this sort of thing, and I think it is only a matter of time before these methods are used against those viewed as “dissidents” in America. But, hey – maybe I’m wrong? Maybe I’m just paranoid and it’s just that everyone in the government is really bad at math?

Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America

Along with the “police state package,” there are a lot of bonus gifts Trump is giving the Democrats. For example, Trump has decided to make it look like he’s implicated in the Epstein documents by claiming they don’t exist, and Democrats can now claim he destroyed them all. This is fantastic news for a lot of Democrat politicians and donors. You could come up with a big list of all sorts of little presents like this Trump will be giving the Democrats in the 2028 handoff.

But given today’s topic of discussion, the most relevant of the bonus gifts Trump will be giving the Democrats is a browner America. Homeland Security claims that virutally no one is crossing the border illegally currently. That seems unlikely, but okay. DHS also claims that as of June, so in Trump’s first six months, they had deported 207,000 people. The goal the administration had set was to deport a million per year, and it looks like in 2025 they might get close to 500,000, half of their 1 million goal. For reference, the Biden Administration was probably allowing about 5 million people a year to enter the country, while in 2024, that administration deported only 270,000.

Given that Trump is going for all of the low-hanging fruit in his first months in office – new arrivals who are near the border – and given that there has been no interest shown in using Congress to change any of the laws, and especially given that is no interest in putting the onus of responsibility on the people hiring and renting to the illegals, it is unlikely that by their 4th year, they will be deporting more than Biden was in his fourth year.

So just to be clear: Biden allowed in 20 millionish, Trump says the goal is to deport 4 millionish, he will probably end up deporting 1.5 millionish. Even after building and arming the biggest federal police agency in history, there is no way he is going to get near Obama’s deportation numbers.

Again, no need for a math whiz to see that just with white deaths and brown births alone, the 2028 America Trump hands off is going to a significantly browner than the 2024 America Biden handed him. But we haven’t added the legal immigrants. That’s about 1 million new people per year, virtually all of them brown. Further, Trump is at least flirting with the idea of removing caps on H-1B visas for Indians, which could mean multi-millions more per year.

Any way you cut it, 2028 America is going to be significantly browner than 2024 America, and it could be a lot browner.

But hey, I heard on Fox News that brown people are leaving the Democrat plantation because of the woke agenda. So maybe it will all work out? Maybe brown folks will get sick of paying these high taxes to people who want to turn their kids gay, and we’ll have a… multiracial working class uprising against the… the woke mob.

Or whatever.

But Hey, Whatever

Many in the internet will claim that a person has no right to identify a problem unless he has already prepared a solution for it. It is difficult to imagine a more infantile mindset for a grown adult man to embrace. But who am I to judge? I simply do my best to look at the world, to examine the facts, and try to explain what is going on to those interested in listening. I would never want to force anyone to listen. You are an adult, and you have a basic right as a human being to believe whatever it is you feel like believing.

I do not have a solution to the very serious problems I am identifying here, and will not even suggest that any such solution exists. I’m just exhausted by this goofy fantasy bullshit. In 2016, Trump said tens of millions of people needed deported. He “lost” in 2020, and tens of millions more were brought in before he “won” in 2024, and now he’s aiming to deport 4 million by 2028, and it seems that number is impossible, but you are going to get a massive police state, both digital and physical, in exchange for removing maybe 1.5-2 million illegal immigrants.

Okay?

That’s what’s happening. Happening alongside the endless wars, the biggest budget ever, the entire Epstein case being thrown into a black hole, and whatever other cute little surprises the Trump administration has up its sleeve over the next 3.5 years. It’s all bad news. So if you want, pretend it’s not happening. No one forced you to read this. At least, I hope they didn’t. If someone did force you to read this, I’m sorry. If it was a Mexican who forced you to read it, you should call ICE, and they will come feed him to an alligator.

When analyzing the American empire, and the evils it is currently in the process of spreading, I’ve determined that a man can either hope that the American empire falls sooner rather than later, or that he dies before things get really bad.

The other thing one can do is pray for incompetence on the part of the evil forces implementing this agenda, but I suppose that falls under the “hoping for collapse” category.

When Trump was allegedly shot in the ear in Butler, I identified this as part of a program to set him up as an overwhelmingly popular leader, who would come into office as a kind of Caesar figure, and be able to do whatever he wanted to do. Unfortunately or fortunately, most of that good will has already been burned through. The Epstein thing was incredible. To actually start yelling about how people need to stop talking about Epstein was beyond my comprehension.

That was just so completely nuts. When I first saw it, I had to confirm it wasn’t AI.

And then this?

As I always note, we live in a democracy. Please don’t say “oh no, we live in a Republic.” Some of you people are just such retards, I really feel like you deserve all of this. Sometimes, I think the Jews are right about the goyim. We do live in a democracy, a representative democratic republic, and this means that you do not have a way to petition grievances. So the government can do whatever they want to you.

However, at some point, any population facing a certain amount of abuse will engage in a violent uprising, so the system is able to move much more smoothly when they have high levels of support. The fact that Trump has burned up so much good will so quickly is confusing and can only really be explained by incompetence on his part and on the part of his cadre. He doesn’t actually have to do anything. He can just pretend he’s trying to do something. But coming out and saying “we must defeat Putin and actually Epstein didn’t even do anything” is really wild.

So sure. Hope their incompetence screws everything up and leads to a collapse. That’s my best advice.

My best advice is actually to leave the United States, and forget the place exists. But most people are not going to do that.

]]>
“Political Loyalty” is a Nonsensical Concept https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/07/09/political-loyalty-is-a-nonsensical-concept/ Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Since the beginning of Donald Trump’s political career in 2015, “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) has been more than a slogan, and instead a concept that embodies a series of simple and easily understood principles about the problems facing America and the solutions to these problems. MAGA was never a specific series of policy proposals, as it was intended to be something bigger than any specific policy. It was a vision of a new America. While short on specifics, the vision was clear: the current establishment had wasted America’s wealth on foreign wars and domestic social engineering agendas that had hollowed out the nation. Though it was not theocratic or puritanical or otherwise moralizing, it was opposed to “weird stuff” which sought to undermine what were traditionally considered “American values,” and it was anti-immigration and anti-war. Again, it was never specific, but everyone definitely understood those three major cornerstones of the program. (It was also “anti-corruption,” though as no one is publicly “pro-corruption,” that is not a particularly meaningful position to take.)

During his first term, Trump failed to do much MAGA, but it was generally understood that he was trying to, but that the president simply doesn’t really have very much power in America. However, in these early months of his second term, Trump is not simply failing to live up to the ideals of MAGA, but is attempting to completely confuse the meaning of the term, attempting to convince his own followers that “MAGA” was never really what they thought it was.

In a series of statements reminiscent of Anthony Fauci’s infamous pronunciation that “I am The Science,” Trump has recently claimed “I am MAGA,” and that he is the decider of what is or isn’t MAGA, and whatever new policies he decides on do not necessarily need to have any relationship to what was previously understood to be the MAGA political platform.

What he is effectively saying is that his political movement was always just about him as a person, and that anyone who ever supported MAGA was supporting him as a person. Therefore, anyone who disagrees with his totally new series of policies he has developed in recent weeks, most of which are the opposite of how MAGA had previously been defined, is not actually a believer in MAGA, because MAGA was never a series of policies, but instead an expression of loyalty to Donald Trump personally, and a pledge to support whatever it is he decides to do at any moment.

This situation is most brightly highlighted in the way Trump has dealt with Congressman Thomas Massie, who is, I would argue, the standard-bearer of the MAGA platform as it was initially introduced by Trump in 2015. Trump has claimed Massie is a traitor and vowed to destroy him. It is very obvious to everyone that Massie has not changed any of his positions on anything.

In the most recent betrayal of the ideals that were sold as representing MAGA, Donald Trump has decided that he wants to continue the endless war in the Ukraine. While meeting with his handler and earthly master Bibi Netanyahu this week, Trump declared that there is no plan to cut any funding to the Ukraine, and he actually plans to increase weapons shipments.

Although it’s not totally clear what happened, it appears that last week, Pete Hegseth halted shipments of weapons to the Ukraine. During the questioning in front of his boss, Trump claimed he didn’t know who was responsible for canceling these weapons shipments, and asked the media to tell him who did it. (Hegseth was sitting directly to his left.) He then declared a planned increase in weapons.

Following these statements, The Washington Post Editorial Board rushed to support Trump, publishing an op-ed praising his support for the Ukraine.

I would not suppose that anyone who voted for Trump in any of his three elections ever expected that the WaPo Editorial Board would become the standard bearer of MAGA, but that is apparently precisely what has taken place.

Trump had previously claimed that involving the US in Israel’s war with Iran actually was in-line with MAGA policy, which was explicitly anti-war, because he wasn’t really doing a war, he was just doing a bombing, not a war.

In another betrayal, Trump’s AG, Pam Bimbo, has claimed that there isn’t actually an Epstein client list. I don’t know what that means and no one has explained it, but the implication apparently is that Epstein did not have any clients, and either no women were trafficked, or they were trafficked to no one.

Though it is perhaps a slightly lesser offense to the MAGA agenda, which has never been particularly focused on fiscal responsibility, Trump has also this week moved to explode the national debt with the biggest spending bill in American history. What is most notable about this is that he vastly expanded military spending to the highest levels ever just weeks after claiming he was going to attempt to halve the military budget.

While “fiscal responsibility” might be slightly beyond the intellectual scope of MAGA, which has never been particularly sophisticated, “we’re going to stop wasting money on foreign wars and spend that money here at home where our country is falling apart” is definitely something we all understood to be core to the MAGA doctrine. Now, because MAGA has been redefined from a series of principles about how America should be run into “whatever Donald Trump says at whichever time he happens to be speaking,” the continuation of the Ukraine war, bombing countries for Israel, and spending the most money ever on war, all fall under the definition of “MAGA.”

A Test of the Limits of “Political Loyalty”

“Loyalty” is a quality that should be explicitly reserved for personal relationships. A man should be loyal to his family. Loyalty to a political figure or a political movement should not be possible, as it serves no purpose.

To be loyal to someone means that you will stick by them whether they are right or wrong. The reason we are loyal to our families is that we need them to be loyal to us, because this is how humans survive. If people abandoned family members because they were wrong about something, we would all be completely alone. We have to take the good and the bad with family members, because we need them.

Loyalty also makes sense in military units. It could make sense in the context of various business relationships. And there are, I’m certain, other examples of where the behavioral quality of loyalty would or could be appropriate.

One place where loyalty is not appropriate is in politics. Being “loyal” to a political figure is nonsensical. The only reason any person would support any political figure is that that political figure is doing political things they agree with and that help them and their personal agenda. There is no place at all for loyalty to a political figure, as you do not personally know the political figure, therefore do no owe the personal allegiance. There is no mutuality at all. Either the political figure is promoting an agenda you agree with, and therefore you rally for them and defend them because you benefit, or they are doing something different, which you do not benefit from, in which case you owe them nothing.

What Trump has done with intention is form a kind of personality cult, where people feel that they know him, and therefore owe him some kind of personal loyalty outside of his role as a policy maker. This is something that is only really possible in the age of electronic media. Most people see Donald Trump speaking nearly every day, and their subconscious mind, which is not familiar with the nature of video screens, registers him as someone they know personally, and are regularly hanging out with socially. Such a person would be the kind of person you would owe a personal loyalty to, and whose mistakes you would overlook, at least until they point where they got completely out of control.

We are going to see the limits of the “loyalty” personality cult tested.

Clearly, the personality cult is not considered ironclad, in the way it would be with someone like Jim Jones, as there is understood to be a need for distractions. This week, Trump is covering up the series of betrayals with a romanesque “cruelty circus,” sending immigrants to cages in an alligator swamp. The media that supports Trump will say “yeah so, I guess there never was an Epstein list, and yeah we’re just going to keep doing that Ukraine war forever apparently – now let’s go back to the scene of the alligator pit, where your tribal enemies, the immigrants, are going to be fed to large, nasty lizards.”

They will keep the circus distractions coming, I’m sure. But ultimately, there is going to be a strict math equation regarding how many people are willing to ignore the fact that Trump is abandoning most of the core of his platform, not only failing to do the things he promised to do, but telling people he never really cared about those things anyway.

It’s worth mentioning that people will continue supporting a political figure that fails if they feel he is trying his best, which is why Trump remained so popular after not doing very much the first time he was president. But this time, it seems he is attempting to completely shift his stated priorities. This week he said “we have to defend the Ukraine.” This is very much the diametric opposite of what he campaigned on when he said “it’s not our responsibility to defend the Ukraine.” That is different than “sorry, I can’t figure out how to get Congress to stop funding the Ukraine” or “I can’t figure out what I’m supposed to do to end this war, this whole thing is really confusing and I don’t know what to do.” What I mean to say is: failure is different than betrayal, and while failure is tolerable, betrayal should not be tolerable.

In the case of “actually, there never was an Epstein client list,” that is just obvious lying, which would fall under the “betrayal” category. Unless a person is stupid enough to believe that Gislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking underage girls to no one, which some Trump supporters are probably stupid enough to believe, though I can’t say for certain.

Unfortunately: Democracy

Fortunately for Donald Trump and his cadre, and unfortunately for all the people in America, we live in a democracy, and therefore it is possible for zero people to support Donald Trump, and for him to remain president, and continue to do whatever it is he feels like doing at any given time.

There are probably some reasons that political support is important in a democracy, but I can’t think of what they might be. Trump appears to care personally about people supporting him, as it appears he has a rather fragile ego that feeds on popular support, and if people are booing him, it appears to hurt his ego. But ultimately, because this is a democracy and there is therefore no mechanism through which the public can petition grievances, he can do whatever he wants while he remains in office, and no one’s opinion about what he does means anything.

That said, Trump probably will maintain some fanatical base of morons who don’t really know much about what is going on but are very excited by alligators. And of course, the polls published can say whatever.

Then, after he does whatever it is he is going to do, he can turn over the government to Gavin Newsom or AOC, and they can be popular for a while after claiming they are going to do something or other, and then become unpopular after they do something different than they claimed they would do. And we will just keep going on like that until eventually, something gives out, and the American empire falls into disarray, and something finally happens.

]]>
Trump Appoints Fine Piece of Ass to Uncover Mysteries of JFK and Epstein https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/12/trump-appoints-fine-piece-of-ass-to-uncover-mysteries-of-jfk-and-epstein/ Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Never send to man to do a job you can send a fine little number to do instead.

Post Millennial:

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) will lead a task force to declassify the Epstein client list, the files associated with JFK’s assassination, as well as other federally classified materials.

According to Fox News, Luna will focus on the aforementioned files along with materials on the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr, 9/11, the origins of COVID-19, UFOs, and more. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer appointed Luna to lead the task force.

Comer told the outlet, “For too long, the federal government has kept information of public interest classified and the American people are demanding greater transparency. This secrecy has sowed distrust in our institutions.” He added that the task force will “build on the Trump Administration’s efforts to declassify records of national importance and ensure Americans get the answers they deserve.”

“Representative Luna is committed to shining a light on the truth and ending the era of secrecy,” Comer continued. “It’s time to let the sunlight in and finally provide answers the American public has long demanded.”

Frankly, I probably would have appointed a man.

But okay.

]]>
Former Model Says Trump Groped Her in “Twisted Game” With Jeffrey Epstein https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/10/24/former-model-says-trump-groped-her-in-twisted-game-with-jeffrey-epstein/ Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000

🚨 BREAKING: Here’s a video of Stacey Williams revealing how Jeffrey Epstein took her to Trump’s home, where Trump groped her.

This needs to be seen by EVERYONE. Please SHARE! pic.twitter.com/CyVKwAzw20

— Mario 🇺🇸🇵🇱🇺🇦🇪🇺 (@PawlowskiMario) October 23, 2024

Oh, come on. More rape hoaxes?

This sucks. Everyone is sick of it. It’s actually good for Trump at this point, the more people who come out with stupid allegations.

I don’t care about that, but I guess I’d say that stupid rape allegations are good for society generally, as they are making the rape gibberish more despised by the public at large.

The Guardian:

A former model who says she met Donald Trump through the late sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein has accused the former president of groping and sexually touching her in an incident in Trump Tower in 1993, in what she believed was a “twisted game” between the two men.

Stacey Williams, who worked as a professional model in the 1990s, said she first met Trump in 1992 at a Christmas party after being introduced to him by Epstein, who she believed was a good friend of the then New York real estate developer. Williams said Epstein was interested in her and the two casually dated for a period of a few months.

Stacey Williams in 1996.

“It became very clear then that he and Donald were really, really good friends and spent a lot of time together,” Williams said.

The alleged groping occurred some months later, in the late winter or early spring of 1993, when Epstein suggested during a walk they were on that he and Williams stop by to visit Trump at Trump Tower.

…

Moments after they arrived, she alleges, Trump greeted Williams, pulled her toward him and started groping her. She said he put his hands “all over my breasts” as well as her waist and her buttocks. She said she froze because she was “deeply confused” about what was happening. At the same time, she said she believed she saw the two men smiling at each other.

Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary for Donald Trump’s campaign, provided a statement denying the allegations, which said in part: “These accusations, made by a former activist for Barack Obama and announced on a Harris campaign call two weeks before the election, are unequivocally false. It’s obvious this fake story was contrived by the Harris campaign.”

Williams says that Trump sent her agent a postcard via courier later in 1993, an aerial view of Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach residence and resort. She shared it with the Guardian. In his handwriting – using what appears to be his usual black Sharpie – he wrote: “Stacey – Your home away from home. Love Donald”.

Williams, who is 56 and a native of Pennsylvania, has shared parts of her allegation on social media posts in the past, but revealed details about the alleged encounter on a call on Monday organized by a group called Survivors for Kamala, which supports Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.

I thought “Survivors for Kamala” was a Holocaust survivors group.

The Zoom call featured actor Ashley Judd and law professor and academic Anita Hill, among others. Survivors for Kamala also took out an ad in the New York Times this week, signed by 200 survivors of sexual and gender violence, which was meant to serve as a reminder that Trump has been found liable for sexual abuse in a court.

“Grope survivor” is a retarded concept. No matter how hardcore the rape is, you’re not going to die from it.

After the alleged incident, Williams said that she and Epstein left Trump Tower, and that she began to feel Epstein growing angry at her.

“Jeffrey and I left and he didn’t look at me or speak to me and I felt this seething rage around me, and when we got down to the sidewalk, he looked at me and just berated me, and said: ‘Why did you let him do that?’” she said on the Zoom call.

“He made me feel so disgusting and I remember being so utterly confused,” she said.

She described how the alleged incident seemed to her to be part of a “twisted game”.

“I felt shame and disgust and as we went our separate ways, I felt this sensation of revisiting it, while the hands were all over me. And I had this horrible pit in my stomach that it was somehow orchestrated. I felt like a piece of meat,” she said in an interview with the Guardian.

She and Epstein parted ways soon after. Williams said she never had any knowledge of his pattern of sexual abuse, which would later become known.

The bitch looks like complete shit now.

What a mess.

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

]]>
SHOCKING: Teenage Sluts as Young as 14 Did Slut Things for Money With Jeffrey Epstein https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/02/shocking-teenage-sluts-as-young-as-14-did-slut-things-for-money-with-jeffrey-epstein/ Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Epstein got a sweetheart deal as the transcripts are finally unsealed pic.twitter.com/yY268Jrjnj

— Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) July 1, 2024

Wait, teenage girls will have sex with rich older men?

And they will accept money and gifts from these men?

Since when? 

This sounds like a bunch of rape to me.

So I’m just going to call it that.

Also, if the rich older man has sex with a girl and then

New York Post:

Florida prosecutors heard testimony that disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein raped teenage girls, but cut a plea deal with him in 2008 anyway, according to newly released court transcripts.

The 150-page transcript of the 2006 grand jury investigation reveals that the court heard testimony about Epstein sexually assaulting girls as young as 14 inside his Palm Beach mansion.

The victims also testified and told detectives that they were paid to find Epstein more girls to assault in a harrowing case that ended with the pedophile sentenced to less than two years in prison after taking a plea deal.

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado, who released the pages on Monday, warned that the transcript would likely outrage anyone who read them.

…

The transcripts show that Palm Beach Police Detective Joe Recarey began the investigation against Epstein in March 2005, when a woman reported that her stepdaughter had received $300 in exchange for “sexual activity with a man in Palm Beach.”

Another teenager then told detectives that when she was 17 years old, a friend told her she could make $200 by providing a massage at Esptein’s home.

When the teen got to Epstein’s home, she told investigators that Esptein demanded she remove her clothes and massage him, according to Recarey’s testimony.

When he tried touching her, the teenager told him she was uncomfortable.

Epstein then told the girl he would pay her if she brought other “girls” to his home, stressing that they be young.

“And he told her, ‘The younger, the better,’” Recarey said.

Over time, the teenager told detectives she brought six friends from her high school to Epstein’s home, including a 14-year-old girl.

She added that when she brought over a 23-year-old friend, Epstein refused and told her that the woman was too old.

The teen allegedly received $200 every time she brought a friend over, as well as a rental car paid by Epstein.

Delgado, who had previously set up a hearing to discuss how and when to release the transcripts next week, decided to release the papers on Monday, the earliest date allowed following Gov. Ron DeSantis’ order in February.

He described Esptein as “the most infamous pedophile in American history.”

EDIOTORIS NOTEEEE:

My computer is on it’s last knoblet.

But I am entering this article to tell you something.

I watched the Louis Theroux interview with Theo Von on my other computer while this one was drying, and Louis is now my new best friend. I’m literally going to start listening to his podcast. I actually want to go on it. Some of his people emailed me years and years ago and I just didn’t reply. I wish I would have met him somewhere, but it’s during a period I was really creeped out by a bunch of shit that happened that I’ll explain sometime in a book, maybe in 5 or so more years. Crazy shit, man.

Anyway, Louis is awesome. I got mad about Michael Jackson, but he’s like this really insecure, sad alcoholic who actually thinks about things.

Anyway, most people won’t agree with me on that. But I do want to see if he’ll have me on his show because I want to debate his vile slanders against Michael Jackson who is literally dead and can’t defend himself from some obviously Jewish weirdo who condescends to Americans because he feels inferior around British people because he’s Jewish and for some reason lies about it.

Anyway, he was pretty freewheeling on the show, and they were talking about the age of consent and Epstein came up and he said “it’s almost like this whole thing is a distraction…” and I was like YES YES YES DO IT LOUIS, but instead of saying the Mossad blackmail total Israeli control of the American elite thing he said (paraphrasing): “it’s really the same thing happening in public and probably much worse in the porn industry, but because the girls are one or two years younger, it’s like it’s off limits.”

And then I was like “Eh. I was hoping for the Mossad thing, but that’ll do.”

His porn documentary (there might have been more than one, I’ve watched most of his films/shows and some of them he does multiple versions of because there is only so much in his “wheelhouse”) is very good. He leans a bit too much towards the “exploiting women” thing, but he legitimately does try to just keep everything even keel and just say “welp, here’s this grotesque thing.”

Anyway, I’m gonna write an article about that interview.

Watch this spot.

And until then, remember this meme that Elvis puts in every single article about “underage” girls (and I love that he does that, because now it’s a meme that we keep posting this meme):

That’s a scientific study.

Any scientific study you do is going to show women’s peak attractiveness at 14.

Sorry!

Hey!

Hey there, little guy – sorry!

I’m sorry!

I’m sorry if you don’t like that, but if you participate in one of these tests (assuming you’re not some kind of pervert), and you have a machine hooked to your body to measure sexual response while you are shown different pictures of girls, your highest sexual response is going to be for girls between the ages of 13 and 16.

I’m sorry, dear friend, but it’s BASIC MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY.

Sex is not about your yum-yums. Sex is about propagation of the species. If we take that as a basic premise, and we look at ourselves as mammals who do not have artificial social constructs forced on them, the best way to propagate the species is with the most fertile women, and women are at peak fertility at 14. You also want to produce as many kids as possible. I asked a (female but not white) doctor when the best age for a woman to have her first child and she said “well, biologically, it’s 15.”

B I O L O G I C A L L Y

Not morally. These morals and what they’re saying about Dr. Disrespect… this is all just complete nonsense pulled out of thin air.

It’s not from the Bible. Saint Paul did not say unto thee “thou shalt set unto thine maidens an arbitrary age years after puberty at which time thou shalt impregnate yon maiden.”

He said no such thing.

Islam, on the other hand, does have an age of consent – it’s nine.

Personally, I think that’s probably going a bit too far.

But that’s the belief of like, 2 billion people on the earth.

-AA

]]>