James Cameron and the submariner community knew the sub was gone.

The media and the government perpetuated the fiction that there was a chance they were alive to distract us. pic.twitter.com/ikUvdQCoiH

— JD’s Coke Habit (@JDsBadHabit) June 23, 2023

The number one expert on the Titanic – the man who made the movie itself – knew this doomed pod was a doomed pup.

You would have to be literally a retard to get in that pod.

You see this wiling ass fag waving around a $30 Logitech controller, and you gotta be like, “nigga, you can’t afford an X-Box controller?  What is up?”

New York Post:

“Titanic” director James Cameron has slammed the days-long search operation for the doomed Titan sub as a “nightmarish charade” — insisting he knew that the vessel had imploded just hours after it lost contact with the surface.

Cameron, a submersible pioneer who has made 33 trips of his own to the Titanic wreckage, told the BBC on Friday that he “felt in my bones” the Titan submersible had been lost soon after the news broke that the five people on board were missing.

The 68-year-old director said the subsequent hunt for the submersible — including the countdown of how much oxygen supply was left and that banging noises had been heard — “felt like a prolonged and nightmarish charade.”

“That was just a cruel, slow turn of the screw for four days, as far as I’m concerned,” Cameron said. “Because I knew the truth on Monday morning.”

“For me, there was no doubt. I knew that sub was sitting exactly underneath its last known depth and position. That’s exactly where they found it,” he added.

“I felt in my bones what had happened. For the sub’s electronics to fail and its communication system to fail, and its tracking transponder to fail simultaneously — sub’s gone,” he said.

The famed director said he quickly reached out to his submersible contacts and was informed within an hour that the vessel was close to the bottom of the ocean floor when it lost contact.

“Their comms were lost and navigation was lost. I said instantly, you can’t lose comms and navigation together without an extreme catastrophic event or high, highly energetic catastrophic event,” he said.

“The first thing that popped to mind was an implosion.”

Honestly, I wanted to hear that they died in a more outrageous way.

But when I saw the hull was carbon fibre, I knew that bitch just popped like a zit.

Zit ass pup – doomed like a bitch.

‘Titanic’ director James Cameron on the ‘catastrophic implosion’ of Titan submersible: “I’m struck by the similarity of the Titanic disaster itself, where the captain was repeatedly warned about ice ahead of his ship and yet he steamed at full speed into an ice field.” pic.twitter.com/vO8JkCXS5f

— ABC News (@ABC) June 22, 2023

James Cameron might have made Avatar 2, but he’s like, you know, an adult.

No adult would think the doomed pod was a good idea.

The Aussie engineer who built the James Cameron sub said that Cameron was obsessed with every detail and would debate if titanium washers were better than stainless steel. Cameron always went down with 2 subs just in case #Trending #implosion #MCWS Billionaires Navy #OceanGate pic.twitter.com/QOPF6W4Aaz

— TweetyUSNews⁷  🎓 😊 (@_____Tweety____) June 23, 2023

That said, Cameron is the only reason anyone gives a shit about the Titanic, so sort of, this is all his fault.

If I was a family member, I would sue Cameron for “making the Titanic seem like it is way more relevant than it actually is in real life.”

BREAKING! “AVATAR: THE WAY OF WATER” made $53 MILLION on Friday (including $17m in Thurs night previews)! That’s the 6th-biggest domestic opening day of 2022 & it’s on track to make between $130m-$150m domestic for the w/e (projections were around $175m)! It cost $350m+ to make! pic.twitter.com/MJIjsKrbbf

— Scott Mantz (@MovieMantz) December 17, 2022

The furry film Avatar 2 is slated to be the biggest box office failure in history, underperforming severely on its opening weekend.

It is one of the most expensive films ever made, and would have to be in the top five releases of all time in order to break even.

This is a major hit to both Hollywood and the furry movement.

It’s very unclear how the studios greenlit a $350 million film in a post-corona hoax environment. I’m sure it was in the works before that virus hoax was announced, but continuing forward with it, when you know people are never going to go back to movie theaters at the same rate, seems incredibly irresponsible.

The film is on track to make less than $150 million in its opening weekend, having been projected to make $175 million.

Part of the problem is that the film does not look very good at all, and in fact, from the trailers, it is clear that it is a severe and aggressive moral lecture about global warming or whatever.

I suspect the film is visually interesting, insofar as CGI spectacle can be visually interesting. However, the general public has become very exhausted with this moral lecturing from media which is supposed to be entertaining.

Hilariously, before the release of the film, director James Cameron denounced “testosterone” as a “toxin” which men need to be cleansed of.

James Cameron thinks that men are toxic, and Avatar 2 is noy out yet. Filming is complete for Avitar 3 & 4. I guess thats 3 movies i will not pay to see. https://t.co/azyb2Jtsx6

— TheXYGhost (@TheXYGhost) December 14, 2022

Mind you, this is the guy who made Terminator 2, which played a leading role in promoting the use of dangerous and harmful synthetic testosterone in bodybuilding.

Apparently, he has not apologized for making that film, and helping to skew the image of what a man’s body should look like.

Along with being an overtly political furry film, Avatar 2 is also 3 hours long, which most people do not have the patience for. When I was young, people would complain about 2 hour films.

It’s unclear to me why you wouldn’t just split a film this long into two parts, which would make it much easier to recoup the cost of the film at the box office. However, they apparently already did that, as this is part one of a three part series of films.

If the first film is already struggling – and it is struggling hard – we can only guess how parts 2 and 3 will do.

Many people will see this flop as a sign that Hollywood will be forced to go back to making movies that do not have such extreme political undertones. However, the people who say that do not seem to understand that Hollywood is run by the Jews who would rather see their entire industry burn down than cease to indoctrinate the goyim.

I was slightly interested in the movie, simply because it is such a major cultural event. However, after seeing the reviews – mostly after having seen the positive reviews from political activists and Jews – I am going to go ahead and wait for the torrent.

James Cameron has been complaining that the new Wonder Woman movie wasn’t really feminist as all it did was play up the lead character’s sexuality.

And of course, now he’s being called-out on that.

There’s some deep cultural relevance here, if you were to think about it long enough, I’m sure of it.

Hold up I’ll try.

Fox News:

Lynda Carter, who portrayed Wonder Woman on the iconic 1970s television show, has slammed James Cameron for his continued criticism of the summer’s blockbuster reboot.

Last month, the “Avatar” director called the “Wonder Woman” movie a “step backwards.”

“All of the self-congratulatory back-patting Hollywood’s been doing over Wonder Woman has been so misguided,” Cameron said in an interview with The Guardian. “She’s an objectified icon, and it’s just male Hollywood doing the same old thing! I’m not saying I didn’t like the movie but, to me, it’s a step backwards.”

So this is what feminism was in the sixties – at least to men.

Boomers like Cameron are still chasing the dream.

Cameron went on to say that he believed one of his popular protagonists, Sarah Connor from the “Terminator” franchise, set a better example for female leading characters in movies.

“Sarah Connor was not a beauty icon. She was strong, she was troubled, she was a terrible mother, and she earned the respect of the audience through pure grit,” he said. “And to me, [the benefit of characters like Sarah] is so obvious. I mean, half the audience is female!”

Sarah Connor was effectively a male protagonist played by a female.

Linda Hamilton, who played the character in both Cameron-directed Terminator films, was not naturally very attractive to begin with, and in the films (particularly the second one) she appeared to either be on anabolic testosterone or a very extreme workout program.

So, the strength of the character – particularly in the second film, which I think is what he is talking about here – was in that it did not rely on sexuality, but masculine, male character traits.

Erstwhile, no men went to see the movie to see an attractive woman, they went for the violence and Arnold.

The posters for the Terminator films did not feature Linda Hamilton prominently if at all.

(Might as well go full memory lane here.)

Here are some from the first film:

And from the second:

And here’s the trailer for the first one:

And the second:

Though Hamilton’s character had more screentime than Arnold’s, she was not the star of these films.

Cameron also did a non-attractive female lead in Aliens.

But again, men had a whole lot of other reasons to go see that movie.

“Wonder Woman” director Patty Jenkins responded to Cameron’s comments and said the “Titanic” director did not understand what “Wonder Woman” stood for because he is not a woman.

Now that is very interesting. Because she is implying that the man is unable to understand “sexual empowerment

Cameron, 63, did not stop there. In a recent interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Cameron said Gal Gadot’s portrayal of the superhero did not “break ground.”

“She was Miss Israel, and she was wearing a kind of bustier costume that was very form-fitting,” Cameron said of Gadot. “She’s absolutely drop-dead gorgeous. To me, that’s not breaking ground. They had Raquel Welch doing stuff like that in the 60s.”

Carter, 66, responded to the director’s comments on “Wonder Woman” in a Facebook post Thursday.

Here’s that post.

And Carter’s Wonder Woman was the same as Gadot’s: a hyper-sexualized character that relies on sex for power and the drawing of a male audience.

The lesson here would be that women never viewed “women’s liberation” in the way that it was sold to men. They always viewed it in terms of overpowering and getting ahead of men – of gaining power over them – by any means necessary. And part of that process was to sell a fake concept of feminism to men. But the biggest part of the process was exploitation of male sexuality.

The other lesson is that Hollywood is admitting that men will not see movies that do not feature either a masculine male lead (or otherwise sympathetic – comedy leads work also) or an attractive female lead.

And if you can’t get men to see it, you can’t get couples to see it, so your film flops. Girls night out can’t carry a big budget film.

The Ghostbusters “remake” proved this.

They are celebrating the success of Wonder Woman as the success of feminism, and James Cameron is pointing out that it wasn’t success of the feminism that he’d been sold – the moral and intellectual equality of women – but instead just the same thing, selling a sex-up slut show.

There had been other blockbuster movies with female leads before, but they always had attractive leads.

Oh and another thing: two other actresses have played Sarah Connor since Hamilton, once on TV and once in a movie – the chick from the Game of Thrones and the other chick from the Game of Thrones – and both have been attractive, sexualized versions of the character.

Ghostbusters was the big attempt to sell a truly feminist film to the masses and it failed, miserably.

So they are now claiming that this is what Wonder Woman was, and Cameron is calling them out on that, saying “this is not the dream I was sold in the 60s.”

Well, they can’t give you the dream of the 60s, James, because that’s what it was – a dream. It doesn’t translate to real life. It doesn’t translate to cash money.

Of course, he will probably now be manshamed into apologizing for cucking, which will take cucking to a whole other level.