Say what you want about the blacks.

Jewish Jeffrey Toobin masturbated on a Zoom conference call on purpose.

RT:

Professional hardships became a highlight at a Jamaica teachers’ conference, as one of its members was caught getting intimate with a partner while her colleague was talking about “necessary connections” during a public Zoom call.

A recorded multi-member Zoom meeting from the 57th Annual Conference of the Jamaica Teachers’ Association (JTA) has gone viral. In an almost two-minute-long video circulating on Twitter, one of the call member’s windows showed sexual intercourse recorded by another conference participant.

Not them having sex Jamaica’s teacher association meeting 😂😂 pic.twitter.com/6Odb45Grdy

— 🇯🇲𝕐𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕚𝕖𝔹𝕠𝕚𝕫 ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕕𝕦𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟🇯🇲 (@YardieboizProd) August 21, 2021

Two people can be seen apparently having sex in a bedroom while a female voice is delivering a speech, saying: “Teaching in the middle of the pandemic was hard.” She keeps on talking about “how important this profession is” and distant teaching “challenges” – “I’ve never taught online and didn’t know what it was” – while her unaware colleague continues getting intimate with a partner in front of the camera.

A computer voice notification ‘Recording in progress’ can then be heard, with a different conference member screaming out loud “What the hell” and calling out to someone to “stop it.”

Lol yes, live zoom sex on Jamaica Teachers Association

They could have kicked them off long time but let’s deflect and gossip 🤭

— Not Your Perfect Guy 🇯🇲 (@TerrorBaby1) August 20, 2021

“We need necessary connections to keep afloat,” the speaker keeps on talking, as a woman can be seen leaning forward to a naked partner. Interrupting the unintended home video, a strict face of a woman, apparently a conference host from what looks like an official venue, then appears in the window.

This is just sort of an obvious thing that is going to happen by default.

The scarier thing is that people will start to feel like they’re being constantly watched, and start behaving in private as if they’re being constantly watched.

We’re all living alone in our rooms and in a panopticon.

The advanced nation of Jamaica is leading the charge to change the weather, as leading Jamaican scientists make in-roads into the problem that everyone is going to burn up because it’s so hot because people used electricity.

If only whites could act more like blacks, we could finally have peace on earth.

Climate Change News:

Jamaica has become the first Caribbean nation to submit a tougher climate action plan under the Paris Agreement by adding targets for forestry and stepping up curbs on greenhouse gas emissions from energy.

The UK, which will host the next UN climate summit in November 2021, delayed from 2020 because of Covid-19, praised the move and urged other nations to follow suit as quickly as possible.

Worldwide, Jamaica is the 11th nation to submit an updated plan, or nationally determined contribution (NDC), at the five-year milestone of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

“Jamaica’s new NDC is more ambitious than its previous one,” the Jamaican government said in a submission to the United Nations, outlining the new goals worked out despite the coronavirus pandemic.

The nation was at risk from more intense hurricanes, sea level rise and a drying trend across much of the island, it said.

Andrew Holness, the prime minister of Jamaica, said that despite the fact that they are not causing global warming because most of the country lives without electricity, they are going to do white people a massive favor and help them out by sharing their science and technology.

In the global scheme of considerations of Climate Change, Jamaica’s carbon footprint is insignificant. Regardless of not being a major contributor to the problem we believe in being a major contributor to solutions.

Source: NDC Partnershiphttps://t.co/4MgAnjS8d7 pic.twitter.com/1MoG6iPWIx

— Andrew Holness (@AndrewHolnessJM) July 3, 2020

You see, black men not only have penises that are three times bigger than white men’s, they are also vastly more moral. While white men are planning to commit oppression and genocide of indigenous communities, Jamaicans are hard at work using science to change the weather.

Jamaican are so intelligent that they knew during the industrial revolution that having combustion engines would lead to the world burning up from too much CO2, so they wisely made the intelligent decision to simply never enter the industrial age.

But selfish whites who only care about capitalism and killing animals for food got the whole world into a flaming mess of trouble, and now it’s up to Jamaica to come save our asses with their plan to deindustrialize the West with a “green recovery.”

Fantastic to see Jamaica's NDC showing greater climate ambition and scope during these difficult times. It's vital we redouble efforts towards a green recovery.

We ask all countries to publish their own ambitious NDCs as soon as possible.@CcdJamaica 👉https://t.co/ym0ICsJ5HU pic.twitter.com/ys5sItecok

— Alok Sharma (@AlokSharma_RDG) July 1, 2020

White people don’t even deserve the help of the blacks, but despite the fact that whites systematically murder blacks for no reason, blacks are always willing to help us out by sharing their scientific knowledge.

Will you be shocked if I tell you this is a Jew?

I can’t decide what the thing I hate kikes for the most is, but giving “human rights” to creatures that aren’t human would probably make the podium.

Breitbart:

Dozens of Jamaican criminals whose deportation was blocked by judges at the last minute included a knife killer and a rapist, prompting anger from government figures tired of the “farce” of judicial review.

There was something of a controversy surrounding the charter flight, which originally involved up to fifty serious criminals, because the migrants involved came to Britain in their youth — although the general public seemed markedly less concerned about it than left-liberal politicians and members of the establishment media.

In the end, only 17 criminals were successfully deported, after the Court of Appeal decided that a three-day mobile phone mast outage meant that another 25 did not have adequate access to legal advice on their cases.

The 25 rescued criminals, who may now have to be released on bail while the Government seeks to rectify the situation, included Fitzroy Daley, who stabbed a man to death outside a pub in London, and Fabian Henry, who “raped a teenage girl in Bristol and groomed and abducted another”, according to The Times.

How the hell is this even a real country?

If I read a novel about the stuff that actually happens in Britain on a daily basis, I’d probably throw it in the trash halfway because of how unrealistic it would seem.

Then I’d go to the store I bought it from and punch the clerk in the face.

Oh, and it gets even better.

The Government is said to be deeply unhappy with the judges’ eleventh-hour interference in the deportations, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s much-maligned chief adviser Dominic Cummings remarking that “urgent action on the farce that judicial review has become” is required.

Johnson’s administration has indicated that it intends to curb judges’ relatively new powers to interfere with political decisions, having already lost a great deal of patience with the Tony Blair created Supreme Court of the United Kingdom for its repeated interventions on Brexit.

On February 13th Johnson appointed Suella Braverman as the Government’s new Attorney-General in a government reshuffle, who wrote an article in late January warning that Brexit would involve “taking back control” not just from unelected foreign officials but from unelected judges as well.

The judiciary, she suggested, has “stretched beyond recognition” the concept of “human rights” in order to increase their own power — and that this would have to change.

Yes, this supposedly right-wing, supposedly racist, supposedly conservative government just put a streetshitterette married to a Jew in charge of justice on the Isle of Cuckistan.

You’re in good hands, you hecking goyim

Remind me again – what did these people ever conserve, ever?

Anything at all?

No?

Then what makes them “conservatives”?

More importantly – why are people still voting for them?

But even for the handful of criminals who were successfully deported to Jamaica, media giants like the publicly-funded BBC appear to be going into overdrive to present them as victims of an injustice.

The corporation’s flagship Newsnight programme flew out correspondent James Clayton to the Caribbean country to interview some of the deportees — although not the more obviously unsympathetic ones, such as killer Daley and rapist Henry — and plastered their social media feeds with videos of them claiming to feel British, to miss their families, and to be facing hardship.

One such clip shows one Rupert Smith complaining that he feels “numb”, “hurt”, and “wounded” by his experience. It does not go into details about the crime(s) he was convicted for, although reports elsewhere indicate he launched a brutal attack on someone with a metal wrench.

Similarly, Rayan Crawford is presented as a “registered disabled” man deported to Jamaica “after being convicted for burglarly”.

However, in a report on its website the BBC admits Crawford was in fact “convicted 10 times for a total of 22 offences, including the burglary.”

I am absolutely shocked that the Jew-controlled media is doing what it’s always done, and what it’ll always do.

I am also shocked that the capital of Cuckdom even deported just a couple of them.

But whether they’re criminals or not shouldn’t matter; the only thing that should matter is that they’re non-White.

And none of them belong in Europe.

Was it worth it?

What is it supposed to mean when a top US official goes to a foreign country to “caution” them against working with a third foreign country?

Is there any way to interpret that as something other than a threat?

Why is the entire United States now Mike Pompeo’s personal army? Did anyone vote for this situation? Because I did not.

Reuters:

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on a visit to Jamaica on Wednesday, cautioned nations against taking “easy money” from China, warning it could be counterproductive, in a second attack in as many days against China’s economic role in the region.

Pompeo has been a vocal critic of Chinese investments across the globe that the United States terms “debt diplomacy,” alleging that it leaves poorer nations saddled with too much debt.

On a final stop of his Western Hemisphere tour, Pompeo questioned what value Chinese money brings if it “feeds corruption and undermines your rule of law.”

“Look into those investments if in fact they ruin your environment, and don’t create jobs for your people,” Pompeo added.

Of course they create jobs.

All investments lead to job creation.

But the US doesn’t create jobs. Instead, they spend trillions on invading and occupying countries, then allow the international private sector to sweep the profits.

On Tuesday, he drew the ire of Chinese officials when he said “flashy” Chinese economic promises often produces debt dependency and erode the sovereignty of borrower nations.

China’s embassy in Costa Rica responded in a statement that Pompeo spoke “irresponsibly” during his remarks in Costa Rica, saying his assertions were “arbitrary and without grounds.”

While in Kingston, Pompeo also doubled down on his criticism of Venezuela’s government, telling Caribbean nations that they should look to boost ties with Washington instead.

Why would anyone want to be tied to a failing country of belligerent and obese lunatics who try to go around threatening the entire world into submission?

The US is a dying empire that is engaged in a sick plot to bring as many countries down with it as possible.

This reminds me of that time Donald Trump tweeted about my comments about Mike Pompeo.

David Cameron, the Conservative prime minister of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern India, recently visited Jamaica, a former colony, to meet with their government and announce a £300m development package for the Caribbean. This includes £25m in British aid for a new Jamaican prison, slated to house Jamaican-born criminals deported from Britain, whose prisons are overcrowded with vibrancy. But even with all this investment money and aid from Britain—and the giving of such aid from Europe to the Third World is not limited to Britain and the Caribbean nor to the current year—there were still calls for Cameron to apologize on behalf of Britain to Jamaica for the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and even for Britain to pay formal reparations to the Jamaican government. In an impressive display of backbone for someone otherwise cuckservative, Cameron rejected this and instead highlighted how Britain’s role in ending the slave trade should be remembered.

Of course, no mention of slavery goes without sparking a conversation in the United States, with the usual gauntlet of leftists and blacktivists arguing in favor of ad hoc gibsmedats for the descendants of long-dead slaves from the successors of long-dead slaveholders, generalized to all black people versus the US government. The loudest proponents of this are typically BPLSWPLs, who’ve been at this for some time and as enemy polemicists are generally uninteresting to the alt-right. I don’t feel it’s worth the time or energy to systematically refute everything they have to say about why they deserve moar gibsmedats. Rather, I will offer my own reasons why I am against reparations, mostly in an American context.

I. It’s Been Paid in Silver

Blacks have had full citizenship in the United States since the 1960s, incidentally a century after emancipation. Since that time—or even since FDR’s New Deal, which won many of them over to the Democratic party—billions of dollars in aid and welfare have been spent on blacks, most of which was extracted from the pockets of Whites. Affirmative action, diversity, and anti-racism hiring practices have also been promoted across the business and academic world to make their ascent easier. If there is a debt, it would seem that it has been paid. But as both left and right know, equality never happened.

Gibsmedat activists will blame structural or institutional racism for the failure of blacks to attain White levels of success. This is true to an extent when examining the history of the United States, but does not hold up past the 1960s/70s era; a better explanation is needed. The “muh oppression” argument is also deficient in that it doesn’t account for scientific racism, which is my preferred explanation for black inequality, to say nothing of differences in culture and work ethic. Let’s have a conversation about that. Let’s talk about differences now, and leave the rent-seeking aside—the government already gives away too much of other people’s money.

II. It’s Been Paid in Blood

Here are some numbers on the Civil War, which resulted in the abolition of slavery in the United States and the formal recognition of blacks as citizens rather than property. The Union raised 2,672,341 soldiers over the course of the war; a vast majority of 2,489,836 were White and a fraction of 178,975 were black. The size of the Confederate Army is estimated to have been between 750,000 and 1,227,890, with full demographic data lost due to incomplete and destroyed enlistment records. It’s safe to assume the South did not arm hundreds of thousands of slaves, given all the exemptions from service made for wealthy Whites and White overseers on plantations, who were needed to keep that population in place during the war. The 642,427 Union casualties (110,100 killed in battle, 224,580 diseases, 275,174 wounded in action, and 30,192 prisoners of war) and the 483,026 Confederate casualties (94,000 killed in battle, 164,000 diseases, 194,026 wounded in action, and 31,000 prisoners of war) make the War Between the States the deadliest war in US history—WW2 had 1,076,245 casualties, less than the combined totals of the Union and the Confederacy. Therefore, the Civil War was overwhelmingly fought between Anglo-Americans and it is they who suffered and died, resulting in the end of slavery. This might sound obvious, but it’s important to remember that White people died so blacks could go to college in the current year and learn how much White people are oppressing them.

While we can and should debate why the Civil War was fought (to preserve the Union, for Southern independence, to end slavery, to preserve slavery, etc.), the ends are what remain as significant to us today. And the ends, through the means of about a million White casualties, were the abolition of black slavery. The four million enslaved Africans living in the United States did not do that themselves, The Union had 2,489,836 White soldiers and 178,975 black soldiers who fought the Confederacy and ended slavery. There were no mass liberation revolts springing up in the South to topple White rule during the war. Blacks were freed from slavery by Whites. The end of slavery was not something preordained; it was a forced campaign by Whites first in Britain and then the United States, with the notable exception of Haiti, which went from being the richest colony in the Americas under French rule to the poorest country in our hemisphere after a slave revolt and its subsequent self-rule. Not even Haiti’s mulatto neighbors want them around. If blacks had ended slavery themselves and created their own country in the South it isn’t hard to imagine how horrible a place it would be to live then and now. Instead they were freed by Whites and given citizenship in the United States. You can’t blame White people for African slavery and ignore that slavery was ended in the United States and around the world by Whites and that the best opportunities in the world for black people are not in Africa but the West. You’re welcome.

III. It Would Establish Congenital Guilt as Legal Precedent

A vexing aspect of our legal system in Anglo-America is that of legal precedent, the notion that past rulings in court cases can be referenced to resolve current cases. It is an old English tradition. It also allows the meaning of the law and its application(s) to mutate rather easily depending on the political leanings of those who arbitrate justice. And courts would be involved in any kind of reparations scheme or gibsmedat initiative, e.g. would it be Constitutional or not? In other words, the implications of enacting a law that would make the US government pay reparations for slavery are not going to be limited to a one-time injection of gibsmedat into black America. It would quite literally cause a legal revolution and institutionalize rent-seeking. One can only imagine how many situations in which Nuffin v. United States would be invoked.

A related issue is this little thing called the statute of limitations, which determines how long you have to bring someone to court for a claim. An extension of that idea dominates Western legal tradition, the idea that the son is not guilty for the crimes of the father—they are separate legal persons and to punish one for something the other has done is widely considered to be injustice. But if the nth-generation descendants of slaves can go after the US government—or even less plausibly, individuals descended from slaveholders—for something that was not a crime in the legal sense when it happened and was committed by people who’ve been dead for at least a hundred years, suddenly lots of things are on the table and little stands in their way. Culpability for crime becomes something that transcends victims and transgressors. It becomes a property one can assign to whoever they want to rent-seek against provided they have popular, if not judicial, support.

Sure slavery was mean and something permitted by the government. But other governments have done bad things to other classes of people at times when there was nothing in the law to stop them, or even a legal system that could be used against them over what they did. Can aboriginals in Australia sue Britain too? Can Ireland sue Britain for criminal negligence during the Famine and eight hundred years of oppression? Can Italy, Greece and Spain sue Algeria over the Barbary pirates and the enslavement of Europeans? Can France sue Italy for the Roman conquest of Gaul? Can Greece sue Turkey for the removal of souvlaki from Asia Minor between 1071 to 1923? Can both Chinas sue Japan for wartime atrocities? Can Armenia sue Turkey for genocide? Can Palestine sue Israel for genocide? Can we sue Israel as the representative of world jewry for White genocide? I’ll go get my popcorn.

IV. Rent-Seeking Intensifies

A quick reminder as to what rent-seeking is: using one’s resources to increase their share of existing wealth without creating new wealth. I’ve hinted at this already but the demand for reparations is essentially macro-sized rent-seeking. How is this going to work? Is the government going to pay out a lump sum to blacks? A monthly stipend? As if we weren’t already subsidizing these people. I wonder what a bunch of high time preference dindus with poor future orientation are going to do with free money. Oh right, the same shit they always do, spend it on consumer goods. That’s not an economic stimulus or ((((social justice)))); it’s just a one-shot spending session of buying more baubles.

Some on the left (and Rand Paul) have this delusion that inside every urban youth is an entrepreneur waiting to burst out and found the next big tech start-up. But entrepreneurship requires more than handouts and investors—it requires investing one’s own time and money, cultivating beliefs and habits conducive to taking a valuable idea and creating a competitive product or service from it, and bringing that innovation to market. I don’t think most people, let alone dindus, have any drive to do this. They want more income to spend on consumer goods, and they want it as regularly and as easily as possible. If you made a thousand extra dollars a month, would you maintain your current standard of living and save that money away for future investment, or raise all of your expenses to live more comfortably and enjoyably? So the notion that throwing even more money at black people is going to create some kind of economic resurgence is just completely ridiculous. We’ve been doing that for decades. In fact, since reparations money would be in the hands of youths themselves rather than the SWPL signalocracy that runs dem programs, it would probably have even less economic impact than programs do.

So in conclusion, reparations have already been paid in blood and treasure, instituting reparations would turn the Western legal tradition on its head, and enabling further rent-seeking would be offensively wasteful of other people’s earned money. Also I just generally don’t want to pay you my income because a minority of Southerners owned slaves a hundred and fifty years ago. I think that’s a reasonable objection and something a White-majority country, even when thoroughly cucked, is going to agree with. For now, the latest gibmedat initiative remains negro LARPing.

In our twisted modern world, it is no longer showing remorse that gets you mercy, but admitting the further crime of sodomy instead.

Daily Mail:

A violent father-of-two escaped deportation moments before being put on a plane to Jamaica – by suddenly declaring he was homosexual.

Alvin Brissett, 55, was ordered to be sent back to his Jamaican homeland after building up a long criminal record including thefts, drug possession, and assaults.

Yet at the last moment, while he was in handcuffs in a van at Gatwick airport, he announced that he was gay and claimed he could not be sent to Jamaica because he could face discrimination there.

This claim halted his deportation in its tracks.

And even though a hearing subsequently ruled it would have been lawful to send him home, as Home Secretary Theresa May wished, he has now won the right to remain.

Two immigration judges have ruled that his human right to a family life is more important than the Government’s wish to protect the public from him. Conservative MP Philip Davies said: ‘This case perfectly shows how the law is an ass. We must be a complete laughing stock.’

Asked about claims that he was not really gay, Brissett told The Sun: ‘I had a right.’

Mrs May spent thousands of pounds of public money to remove Brissett from Britain.

Brissett, of Stratford, East London, was 13 when he came to Britain. He has 18 convictions for theft, three for possession of drugs, and four for assault.

In 1993 he was jailed for seven years for robbery, and ten years ago he received a 12-month sentence for theft and threatening behaviour.

Then, in 2009, after he was jailed for a street attack, the Home Office ordered that he should be sent to Jamaica. Brissett immediately began using human rights laws – and his right to a family life – to contest the deportation, but all his appeals failed. In March 2011, Mrs May signed his deportation order.

Jamaica is pushing back against the queer agenda, which they view as being promoted by the United States in their country.

Once again, non-Whites are shaming us with their level of civilization.

The anguished response to the introduction of material deemed to be age-inappropriate by Jamaicans For Justice (JFJ) into six private homes for children is the latest indication of that resistance.

No one will successfully accuse us of being anti-gay in this space. We stand firmly against the beating of homosexuals and for greater tolerance of gays and lesbians as Jamaicans with rights similar to the rest of us. If someone chooses to practise that lifestyle, it is their business, if they are not trying to force it on anyone else, including children.

As late as Thursday, May 22, 2014, we noted: “…But we admit to growing unease that the gay community is not as tolerant as they want others to be of them.”

It is our view that, over the years, Jamaicans have been growing in patience and tolerance, generally leaving homosexuals to do what they wish to do in private. But taking their cue from the United States, apparently, Jamaican gays have been adopting a more aggressive stance in demanding to be recognised as equal to heterosexuals. One gets the impression that, in the US, heterosexuals don’t even have the right to say they disagree with the gay lifestyle, without attracting some form of punishment.

Not satisfied with blocking entertainers who have been accused of producing “hate material” advocating violence against gays from making money in some countries overseas, the community’s leadership has told outright lies against the Jamaican nation, by consistently portraying gay-on-gay violence as evidence of “homophobia” and abuse of gays. This has assisted in gaining sympathy from fellow gays overseas and, in some cases, asylum and funding. But Jamaicans have been quietly seething.

With strong funding from their American counterparts, the gay leadership has also infiltrated several organisations, using harmless0sounding words like “human rights”; “marginalised youth”; “vulnerable community”; “responsible sexuality,” etc. The most obvious takeover, in this regard, is the regional programme to reduce HIV/AIDS, the disease known to afflict homosexuals especially.

Instead of Whites paying reparations to blacks for slavery, we demand that blacks pay reparations to us for the destruction of our once prosperous cities and colonies. These reparations can take the form of manual labor on our plantations. And while we’re at it, we should demand extra repayment from the Jamaicans for the scourge of reggae music and rasta culture that has corrupted our youth.

From the Telegraph:

A coalition of 14 Caribbean states, including Jamaica… is now mounting the first united campaign for reparations from Britain over its role in the Atlantic slave trade.

The group is ready to sue in the courts and has hired Leigh Day, the London law firm that last year won £20 million for Kenyans tortured by the British during the Mau Mau rebellion of the 1950s.

This month it will unveil a list of 10 demands for Britain, France and Holland, including funds likely to total billions, an apology, and assurances slavery will never be repeated, The Telegraph can disclose.

Professor Verene Shepherd, the chairman of Jamaica’s reparations committee, said British colonisers had “disfigured the Caribbean,” and that their descendants must now pay to repair the damage.

“If you commit a crime against humanity, you are bound to make amends,” Prof Shepherd told The Telegraph. “The planters were given compensation, but not one cent went to the freed Jamaicans”.

As usual, the Caribbean Negroes demanding reparations fail to mention the fact that their islands were incredibly prosperous under White rule, but have fallen into third world status after Whites were kicked out.