j street – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png j street – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Biden: “Overwhelming Frustration” with the Jew-Israel Government https://www.anglinarchive.com/2016/04/21/biden-overwhelming-frustration-with-the-jew-israel-government/ Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 21, 2016

tumblr_static_tumblr_static_29w7m2ewtrr4480kwckoc0o44_640joe biden anne frank

Both John Kerry and Joseph Biden appeared before the Jew group J Street earlier this week. J Street is a pro-Israel Jew group that plays like it is more reasonable. They supported the Iran deal, and promote a two-state solution. This is in pretty stark contrast to AIPAC’s “Gas the Arabs, Greater Israel Now!” approach.

As he often does, Biden said some funny things.

Washington Post:

“We have an overwhelming obligation, notwithstanding our sometimes overwhelming frustration with the Israeli government, to push them as hard as we can toward what they know in their gut is the only ultimate solution, a two-state solution, while at the same time be an absolute guarantor of their security,” Biden said.

Biden called the path to peace “shrouded” and said that when he visited the region last month he came away discouraged at the prospects for peace talks.

“There is at the moment no political will that I observed among Israelis or Palestinians to move forward with serious negotiations,” he said. “The trust that is necessary to take risks for peace is fractured on both sides.”

Biden criticized Palestinian leaders for failing to condemn terrorist acts but also singled out the “steady, systematic expansion” of Israeli settlements on land Palestinians desire for a state as a step in the wrong direction.

“They are moving toward a one-state reality, and that reality is dangerous,” Biden said.

He concluded with a grim warning: “The present course Israel’s on is not one that’s likely to secure its existence as a Jewish, democratic state — and we have to make sure that happens.”

Must be very difficult for the Obama people to keep up this undying support for a terroristic, genocidal state while also being the champions of social justice.

It’s a good trend though, the leftist outrage at Israel. Because now they’re getting it from both sides. It’s a difficult thing to hold together. I mean, this whole “overwhelming obligation” part – what is it supposed to mean, even?

Selection_999(1573)

Whence does this obligation originate?

Even if the Holocaust had actually happened, that would be on the Germans. We fought the Germans.

The idea that we are forever obligated to spend endless billions of dollars to Israel so they can continue to start wars and commit outrageous atrocities is a notion wearing very thin with everyone.

Besides the cuckolded scum of the earth evangelical Cruz voters. But they’re all going to be dying out here pretty soon. The youngest of the boom-cuck generation is 60 now. We are finally going to be rid of these people once and for all – and who’s gonna support Bible “end times” prophecy kikery when they’re gone.

No one. No single non-boomer believes in Biblical prophecies of the end times.

It was a boomer favorite as it created a fantastic excuse to destroy any potential for the youth to have a future.

baby-boomers-running1

“Just here at the beach enjoying life, waiting for Space Jesus. Our children are so ungrateful. But when Space Jesus gets there, they’ll thank us for all this money we shipped to Israel while depriving them of a future. Boy oh boy, that Space Jesus – he’ll fix things good.”

The Jews were like “don’t worry goyim, just enjoy yourself and support Israel and Space Jesus will come and suck you up into heavenly paradise any second, because you were such good goyim.”

When this element is removed by cancer and heart disease, this idiot gas chamber hoax isn’t going to be enough of an excuse to all these wacky Jews to completely destroy the world on our dime.

The Jews have really overplayed their hand with this thing.

They should have chilled.

Here’s the full speech.

]]>
“J-Street”, the Jewish Council of Presidents Reveals Hateful Jewish Motivations https://www.anglinarchive.com/2014/05/18/j-street-the-jewish-council-of-presidents-reveals-hateful-jewish-motivations/ Sun, 18 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000 David Duke
May 18, 2014

The Jewish Council of Presidents (of Major Jewish  Organizations) recently refused membership to the leftist-Zionist “J Street” lobby. That organization’s official reaction, serves as a case-book study on how Jewish Supremacists arrange matters so that both sides of any public debate on Israel and Jewish affairs is controlled by racist, tribalist Jews who are first and foremost devoted to Jewish supremacy.

“Right wing” Jews protest against J Street at the Conference of Presidents meeting at the beginning of May.
“Right wing” Jews protest against J Street at the Conference of Presidents meeting at the beginning of May.

At the beginning of May 2014, the Council of Presidents voted 22 to 17 against admitting J Street to the organization. The main reason given was voiced by the Zionist Organization of America, which issued a statement saying that J Street had shown itself to be an “extremist group hostile to Israel.”

In response, J Street executive director Jeremy Ben-Ami wrote an article in the Times of Israel spelling out exactly what his organization stood for:

“J Street is pro-Israel. We do what we do because we care so profoundly about the country, its people and its future.

“J Street’s commitment to Israel is the centerpiece of its mission. We believe in the right of the Jewish people to a national homeland in Israel, in the Jewish and democratic values on which Israel was founded, and in the necessity of a two-state solution.”

“Yes, J Street is critical of some policies of the present government of Israel because we, like many Israelis, see them as counter to Israeli interests. It should be out of bounds to question our love or concern for the state of Israel and its people.”

Ben-Ami goes on to say that J Street:

– Does not support the Boycott-Disinvestment-Sanctions (BDS) movement,

– Has supported “every piece of Iran sanctions legislation that has passed Congress,”

– Supports all moves to “prevent[ing] Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability,” and

– Supports keeping “the military option on the table” with regard to Iran.

In fact, as Ben-Ami points out the only difference between J Street and the rest of the Zionist Lobby is that J Street supports a two-state solution to the “Israeli-Palestinian” crisis.

What this actually means is that J Street merely wants to present Zionist Supremacism in a “softer” format to the world—and then only because they understand full well that the “hard” Zionist Supremacist approach is actually waking increasing numbers of people up to the reality of the real problem: Jewish behavior.

Astute observers will therefore see that in reality, nothing that J-Street stands for is actually in anyway substantially different to AIPAC or any of the other Jewish interest groups which dominate America, despite posing as a so-called “leftist” grouping.

This strategy of dominating both sides of the “argument” is one which is being increasingly used by Jewish Supremacists, and is yet another example of their inherent dishonesty and attempt to manipulate public awareness of their nefarious activities.

Fortunately, the power of the Internet has broken the stranglehold of the Jewish lobby over the information distribution network, and deceptive stunts like J Street do not even work any more

Note: What is the  Actual Jewish Two State Solution?

* It is also worth noting that even the “two state solution”, proposed by J Street, is in fact a racial political option. It implies dividing the population in Palestine up on racial grounds, and giving them each their own geographic area.

This “solution” would of course be vehemently opposed by ALL the Jewish Supremacists–J Street included–and their fellow tribalists in the controlled mass media should any other nation on earth seek to create an ethnically or racially-exclusive state.

Thus J Street is not even actually “leftist” at all, but, by their own definition, “extreme racist.”

* Honest observers would also point out that the real reason for the “disagreement” between the Council of Presidents and J Street that the former seeks to steal all the land of Palestine and one day completely ethnically cleanse the Palestinians from it –  while the latter only wish to cordon them off in their own state which will be accompanied by the expulsion of all Palestinians from the present Israeli state.

]]>