If you saw a headline “Lord of the Rings Something Something Trannies,” you’d probably think “they’re adding trannies to The Lord of the Rings.”

In fact, they don’t have to add them – they were there all along!

You just didn’t notice them, because you were too bigoted!

New York Post:

This year’s annual Tolkien Society seminar will pay “more critical attention than ever” to diversity issues, according to an announcement by the literary charity.

Academics and non-academics alike interested in J.R.R. Tolkien’s high-fantasy world will read papers at the conference next week with titles such as “Gondor in Transition: A Brief Introduction to Transgender Realities in The Lord of the Rings” and “Pardoning Saruman?: The Queer in Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings.”

The organization, founded in 1969, exists to promote the life and work of Tolkien, the English Catholic writer of epics set in Middle-earth.

“Tolkien’s efforts to represent (or ignore) particular characteristics requires further examination,” the organizers wrote.

The conference will be held virtually on Zoom on July 3 and 4.

“Spurred by recent interpretations of Tolkien’s creations and the cast list of the upcoming Amazon show The Lord of the Rings, it is crucial we discuss the theme of diversity in relation to Tolkien,” the organizers wrote.

An organization that has existed since 1969 to discuss classic children’s fantasy literature is now taken over by trannies.

This is worse than the birdwatchers being taken over by brown people.

The basic lesson is that you just can’t let women into organizations that were designed for men.

And yes, they’re talking about the new Amazon series – they want trannies in that, no doubt.

It’s probably going to get much weirder than that – race warriors who have infiltrated Dungeons & Dragons have already established that orcs are fantasy stand-ins for black people. So Amazon’s LotR is probably going to need to feature some orc males getting sexy with some elf females, as is the custom.

I have told you before that I believe in things that I dare not speak of on this site.

Or at least, things that I dare not make an issue of on any sort of a regular basis.

But, as we are presently faced with proof of one such thing, I will tell you one such thing: I believe that an age of dragons once existed. I believe they were conscious beings, as are portrayed in the books of Tolkien, who existed as a challenge to men, as the Jew presently exists as a challenge to men.

An actual dragon has now been found, looking just as it is portrayed in the images of men who channel this age. But they are calling it a dinosaur.

This is one of the most fantastic discoveries ever made, and yet, we are told it is another dinosaur.

Dinosaurs themselves, by the way, have never been fully explained, in any sort of meaningful way.

And perhaps that is worth reflecting on.

"Best preserved armoured dinosaur in the world". New #GroundsForDiscovery opens @RoyalTyrrell. Full of accidental finds by Alberta workers. pic.twitter.com/sdy0YVbPiJ

— Brad MacLeod (@CTVBradMacLeod) May 12, 2017

The #Nodosaur on display with metal tail sculpture and 3D printed head touchable. #GroundsForDiscovery @RoyalTyrrell pic.twitter.com/ydhtKU2Ljw

— Salamander Sam (@SammyKSampson) May 12, 2017

The National Geographic is claiming that it looked like this:

However, they are admitting they have no evidence to support that theory, as allegedly, only the head and shoulders of the creature have been found.

Note that it was found in 2011, and is just now being unveiled.

They are also claiming it is 110 million years old, even while we know that fossils are pretty well impossible to date.

You can read the full National Geographic article.

And make up your own mind.

RT:

A newly unveiled 110 million-year-old fossil, described as “the best preserved armored dinosaur ever found,” is providing researchers with invaluable information about the recently discovered species.

The ancient fossil was accidentally discovered by machine operator Shawn Funk at a mine near Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada, in 2011.

Further investigation revealed that the extraordinary fossil was a newfound species of plant-eating ‘nodosaur.’ The beast was so remarkably well preserved because its remains ended up in a river, possibly swept up by a flood, shortly after it died.

Its carcass was then carried out to sea where it sank to the ocean floor, becoming enveloped in mud which both preserved and petrified the nodosaur’s remains, giving the fossil the appearance of a sleeping dragon.

Usually just a dinosaur’s bones and teeth survive long enough to be fossilized, however, in this case because of its quick burial, intricate details of the nodosaur’s scale armor were preserved. The fossil has revealed valuable details to researchers about the makeup of the animal’s armor.

“We don’t just have a skeleton… we have a dinosaur as it would have been,” postdoctoral researcher Caleb Brown told National Geographic of the extraordinary find.

For researchers, finding the fossil was like winning the lottery. Jakob Vinther, a Paleobiologist from University of Bristol, said that it’s so well preserved it “might have been walking around a couple of weeks ago…I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Is there an effort by certain elements of society to confuse the fact that Atlantis existed, and before that, and age of giant intelligent lizards who terrorized mankind?

Is there an effort to bury evidence which would lead people to believe that the white race has been on this earth for millions of years, and once fought dragons?

I have absolutely no idea.

But it is an interesting thought.

As far as ancient Atlantis, I think it is difficult to make an argument that it didn’t exist.

Surely, such knowledge would change the way we view ourselves, would it not?

I personally believe that J.R.R. Tolkien channeled events which actually took place in history.

Stories of dragons certainly existed long before the first dinosaur fossils were discovered in the 17th century.

And I do believe that at the core of the Jewish vision of global destruction lies a plan to make the white race believe that it is something other than a spiritual being which exists as a part of a spiritual universe, which has always existed.

Destroying our history goes beyond taking down confederate monuments.

If this guy was like “look dude, you can trust me with this ring of power and the fate of all of Middle Earth – I’m a solid bro,” then I would be like “yeah okay you seem cool just be chill and don’t get us all in a mess.”

J.R.R. Tolkien obviously channeled ancient mythological history into his stories in the same way that Robert E. Howard and others did.

Thus, when the Hobbit skeleton was discovered, there was no shock on my end. I was just like “yeah well, obviously.”

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about the new claim that Hobbits are not related to humans. I guess I am pretty neutral on it.

Except, in showing that they are not an ancestor of humans, it demonstrates that they are indeed something which lived side-by-side with us, during the period of the Middle Earth.

The Sun:

Ancient “hobbits” recently discovered in Indonesia were not an early form of modern human but an entirely different species, scientists have found.

The ancient hobbits, who would have stood at 3.5 foot tall, were found at Liang Bua on the island of Flores in 2003.

Experts initially believed the Homo Floresiensis – or Flores man – were just a shrunken variety of early humans.

But a study by The Australian National University (ANU) found the race were most likely a different species altogether.

Researchers think they were related to a sister species of Homo habilis – one of the earliest known ancestors of modern mankind which lived in Africa 1.75 million years ago.

So then, what other races are there?

Humans were of course humans as we know them now – that is to say, “white people.”

Well, obviously the elves are the gooks.

The orcs are the Negroids.

The dwarves are the pure-blooded gingers, now mixed with the Celtic/Irish.

And the dragons were some form of dinosaur.

Note that no one has ever proven that dinosaurs couldn’t talk.

The dark wizards were obviously kikes, probably from another dimension or from outer space.

Basically friends, what I’m trying to inform you of is that all inspired/good fiction is the result of channeling through spirits that guide. That is the concept of the “Muse.” We as human beings are merely receivers, picking up signals from the eternal timeless void of infinity.

Science fiction is also real, being channeled from the future, which is why we need to keep our eye on the ball if we ever want to be space marines.

What with the new movie out, it seems appropriate to comment on Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit writer J.R.R. Tolkien’s love for the Jewish parasite, and his aggression toward the valiant, noble German Reich.

Firstly, I will note that I read the Hobbit as a boy, and enjoyed it quite a bit, but when I attempted to read the LotR trilogy, found myself too bored to make it through the second book (The Twin Towers).  I think that, largely, the books are good, in that they deal fairly with Norse myth, and present a generally positive message for the kids.  Of course, novel reading is a dead art, so it doesn’t much matter now.

Still, the Germans were well within their rights to question the racial identity of Tolkien, in that they did not want to have any Jewish filth slipped into the mind of the youth.

In 1938, after having been in discussions regarding a German translation of the Hobbit, the German publisher Rütten & Loening asked for confirmation of Tokien’s Aryan heritage.  This upset the poor old chap, and he wrote the following to his friend and publisher Stanley Unwin:

I must say the enclosed letter from Rütten & Loening is a bit stiff. Do I suffer this impertinence because of the possession of a German name, or do their lunatic laws require a certificate of arisch origin from all persons of all countries?

Personally, I should be inclined to refuse to give any Bestätigung (although it happens that I can), and let a German translation go hang. In any case I should object strongly to any such declaration appearing in print. I do not regard the (probable) absence of all Jewish blood as necessarily honourable; and I have many Jewish friends, and should regret giving any colour to the notion that I subscribed to the wholly pernicious and unscientific race-doctrine.

You are primarily concerned, and I cannot jeopardize the chance of a German publication without your approval. So I submit two drafts of possible answers.

You read that correctly.  Even in 1938, this chap had the nerve to call scientific racism “unscientific.”

Apparently, he never saw this:

Though it is unclear which letter the publisher sent, the first draft was one ignoring request entirely, and the second was this:

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for your letter. I regret that I am not clear as to what you intend by arisch. I am not of Aryan extraction: that is Indo-Iranian; as far as I am aware none of my ancestors spoke Hindustani, Persian, Gypsy, or any related dialects. But if I am to understand that you are enquiring whether I am of Jewish origin, I can only reply that I regret that I appear to have no ancestors of that gifted people. My great-great-grandfather came to England in the eighteenth century from Germany: the main part of my descent is therefore purely English, and I am an English subject – which should be sufficient. I have been accustomed, nonetheless, to regard my German name with pride, and continued to do so throughout the period of the late regrettable war, in which I served in the English army. I cannot, however, forbear to comment that if impertinent and irrelevant inquiries of this sort are to become the rule in matters of literature, then the time is not far distant when a German name will no longer be a source of pride.

Your enquiry is doubtless made in order to comply with the laws of your own country, but that this should be held to apply to the subjects of another state would be improper, even if it had (as it has not) any bearing whatsoever on the merits of my work or its sustainability for publication, of which you appear to have satisfied yourselves without reference to my Abstammung.

Here you can see that Tolkien was not merely a cheeky and pretentious Englishman, but also a lover of the Jews.

He would later go on to refer to Adolf Hitler as a “ruddy little ignoramus,” and support the total destruction of the German nation by the sickening Jews.

Ian McKellen, the homosexual actor who plays the wizard Gandolf in the films, has said that Sauron is really Hitler: “What is Sauron? I would think of Hitler. He’s the great evil force of our time, and certainly of Tolkien’s.”

I would have expected that weird gay bastard to have a bit more depth to him.  Referring to complex political situations as having resulted from “evil persons” is weak, even if you are against National Socialism because you are a weird old queer.