When Rachel Dolezal declared herself “trans-racial,” thus justified in taking a plush NAACP job, the Judeo-left universally condemned her as a con-artist and usurper.

Somehow, pretending to be something you biologically aren’t doesn’t apply to trannies. They don’t bother explaining the difference, they just launch mob attacks against you if you ask too many questions.

The J-left has a term for feminists who reject the idea that men who dress up like women and take hormones are female: “TERFs” (trans-exclusionary radical feminists).

Most Antifa PC militias have green-lit TERFs. They have orders to kill/assault them if they show their faces in public.

But in Montreal, it looks like the kooky feminists are organizing to take down the male homo appointed by the local elites to lead them.

The system is taking the transsexual’s side.

Montreal Gazette:

Gabrielle Bouchard began her term as president of the Fédération des femmes du Québec with a call for women’s equality, echoing the demands of leaders of the province’s main feminist organization going back to its creation more than 50 years ago.

But a month into the job, Bouchard has faced a backlash over what sets her apart from her predecessors: that she was born male.

As the first transgender woman to head the federation, Bouchard’s ability to speak for women has been challenged by some feminists who portray her gender transition as a lifestyle choice.

“Is a trans woman a real woman?” asked the headline above one Journal de Montréal column. “Being a woman is not a choice or an identity,” the head of a splinter feminist group wrote in another column critical of Bouchard’s election.

Bouchard, 49, said she did not expect her arrival as president to stir such controversy. “I had to realize that it is a big deal, because we are still at a point where we tolerate some identities, or we tolerate some people who are at the margins . . . as long as they stay where we believe they are supposed to be,” she said in an interview.

“If women are going out of the places that we create for them, then we start to see a backlash.”

Disagreement in feminist circles over the place of trans women is not new. In Canada, transgender woman Kimberly Nixon lost a long court battle in 2007 after a Vancouver rape crisis centre refused to let her work as a counselor because she was not born female.

In the United States and the United Kingdom, tensions occasionally flare between trans activists and a fringe of radical feminists who insist on regarding transgender women as men.

Last year, the Nigerian author and feminist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie stirred controversy in an interview with a British TV network in which she argued that the transgender experience should not be “conflated” with women’s experience.

“It’s about the way the world treats us, and I think if you’ve lived in the world as a man with the privileges that the world accords to men and then sort of change gender, it’s difficult for me to accept that then we can equate your experience with the experience of a woman who has lived from the beginning as a woman and who has not been accorded those privileges that men are,” she said.

…

The assault on Bouchard’s leadership was led by columnist Denise Bombardier, who wrote that the goal of trans activists is to “smash the reality of the two sexes to impose an appalling vision where neither man nor woman would exist any more.”

Diane Guilbault, who broke from the federation in 2013 and founded the organization Pour les droits des femmes du Québec, said it is one thing for Bouchard to advocate for trans rights, as she did in her previous job at Concordia University.

But for her to speak on behalf of Quebec women is a step too far, Guilbault said in an interview.

“We think the experience of a woman who is born a woman is completely different from the experience of a man who decides one day to present himself as a woman,” she said.

“It’s not enough to say, ‘I feel that I am a woman, so I can speak in the name of women.’ For us it’s the same as saying, ‘I feel black, so I can speak in the name of blacks.’ ”

Canada is so far gone that the ongoing culture war is middle-aged dykes and faggots who mutilate their penises arguing over what a woman is.

When it comes to cultural Marxism and “progress,” the (((nation-retarders))) will never be satisfied. They will keep shifting the poles of degeneracy, and refuse to tell us when they want this ride to end.

America is no exception. We already see trannies like Blair White being promoted by (((Dave Rubin))) and co. as the new conservative thought-leaders.

If you’re a young, white, heterosexual man, the modern West’s death throes are intense and insane. But take solace in the fact that this can’t go on forever. And be organized so that when it all comes down, we will fill the political vacuum.

Disney’s latest Star Wars cash grab has a huge gap between the critical reception (92%) and audience reviews (52%) on Rotten Tomatoes. It’s also bombing at the box office relative to previous releases.

According to Jews, this is part of an evil alt-right conspiracy.

You see, it can’t be that professional reviewers working for mainstream Judenpress are cherry-picked for their ideology or corrupt assholes frightened by Disney’s clout as an advertiser. Instead, the disconnect between reviewer and audience is the product of Neo-Nazi bots!

The paranoid fake news kike Drew Schwarz amplified (((Matthew Jacobs’))) Huffington Blog entry making these claims and the rest of the MSM picked it up from there.

Vice:

Critics seem to love The Last Jedi, and it’s raking in cash hand over fist at the box office. But for a movie that’s apparently obscenely popular, it’s facing some pretty serious backlash from viewers—as of Thursday, its audience score on Rotten Tomatoes weighed in at 54 percent. So what gives?

According to the Huffington Post, a fringe alt-right group might be to blame. Some anonymous troll behind the Facebook group “Down With Disney’s Treatment of Franchises and its Fanboys” told HuffPo he dispatched an army of bots to flood The Last Jedi’s Rotten Tomatoes page with negative reviews. The moderator—who self-identifies as alt-right—said he went after the movie for its “feminist agenda,” arguing that Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) is a “victim of the anti-mansplaining movement,” Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) is somehow being “turn[ed] gay,” and that there are too many women featured in the film.

“I’m sick and tired of men being portrayed as idiots,” the moderator told HuffPo. “There was a time we ruled society and I want to see that again. That is why I voted for Donald Trump.”

In a Facebook post, the moderator took sole credit for The Last Jedi’s low audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes, claiming that his bots “rigged this score and still keep it dropping.” But as the review aggregator tells it, that’s a load of bunk. A representative from the site told HuffPo that if an army of bots were shitposting on The Last Jedi’s page, Rotten Tomatoes would’ve noticed.

“As a course of regular business, we have a team of security, network, social, [and] database experts who monitor all of our platforms and they haven’t seen any unusual activity,” the rep said.

So in other words, Schwarz knows this isn’t true, but you don’t get the truth until the bottom 1/4 of the article. This is the formula used by the Judenpress to lie, as they know their easy-to-gaslight readers don’t look past the title and a few paragraphs.

Any time you see a massive difference between (((critical reception))) and audience reception, it’s because there is a political factor at play.

Both Fight Club and Conan the Barbarian were revolutionary works of art when they first came out. Jew-enabled cultural Marxists like Roger Ebert gave them low reviews solely because he didn’t like exactly what resonated with the audience: the message. He famously ignored much of Fight Club’s artistic merits because of its quasi-Fascist characters.

Today on Rotten Tomatoes, we see the “professional” movie reviewers in lab coats gave Fight Club an average rating of 70%, while the audience rates it 96%!

The audience is indeed offended by the Tumblrfication of Star Wars under the expanding ear shadow of Moshe Rat Inc., but that’s just one of the many stink lines coming out of this film can.

Let’s see how all-encompassing the Alt-Right conspiracy is when the film premieres in China on January 5th and they find out the negro character’s love interest is an Asian girl.

A small group of politically correct soldiers (Antifa) in Portland, Oregon decided to try and intimidate some Christians who had the nerve to publicly celebrate the holiday.

What happened next was nothing short of a Christmas Miracle!

Santa was in his shiny red sleigh rushing to deliver presents to good boys and girls, but he apparently brings an early hip replacement to the bad xirs and xes!

This was obviously a multi-racial religious group, but these Antifa fanatics have their politics informed by the Google HR department.

These Judeo-Left assholes spend hours listening to lectures about the “structural oppression” of everything from onion rings to Apu.

But after Charlottesville and now this, maybe the pajama boys LARPing as communist revolutionaries should take a class on how to cross the street.

Life comes at you fast!

The J-left Antifa degenerate pictured above is a murderer. His victim is a 55-year-old man who made the mistake of drinking in a bar by himself in the colors of his national flag.

To show what a joke the Spanish justice system is when reining in its J-left irregular army, the psychotic criminal Rodrigo Lanza only did five years for a 2006 political gang attack so brutal it left the victim paralyzed from the neck down!

Naturally, this anarchist junky globalist has finally killed someone.

Antifas kill and seriously injure people all over the world all the time. The Jew media talking heads who claim they don’t while calling a car accident in Charlottesville “domestic terrorism” are just propagandists who support Antifa.

When Pavlos Fyssas got stabbed in Greece after trying to jump a Golden Dawn member, it was international news. This case, on the other hand, will be ignored, i.e. covered-up by Jew-run wire services like Associated Press (Steven Swartz) and Reuters (Stephen Adler).

El Pais:

A 55-year-old man died in Zaragoza on Tuesday night as a result of the beating he received outside a bar last week by a leftist radical who didn’t like the suspenders he was wearing; they were in the colors of the Spanish flag.

The alleged attacker, a 33-year-old member of the Barcelona squatter movement named Rodrigo Lanza, had already served a five-year sentence for assaulting a local police officer in the Catalan capital; that victim has been a quadriplegic since 2006.

This latest assault took place at around 2.30am in the early hours of Friday outside El Tocadiscos, a bar located on Antonio Agustín street, in Zaragoza’s old town district, the local daily Heraldo de Aragón reported.

Víctor Láinez, 55, got into an argument with a group of people inside the bar. He was alone at the time. Witnesses said that the attacker and three other individuals began yelling at Láinez and calling him a “facha,” short for “fascist,” because of the red and yellow stripes on his suspenders.

When Láinez walked out of the bar, two individuals came running after him. Witnesses said that Lanza struck the victim on the head with a metal bar; he and his accomplice then kicked the man several times as he lay unconscious on the ground before running away.

Láinez was admitted into Hospital Clínico with severe head damage and four blood clots that left him brain dead. He died on Tuesday after being taken off life support.

On the night of the attack, the National Police launched an investigation that focused on radical left-wing groups in the Aragonese capital. Lanza was arrested late on Monday. His accomplice was held, then released.

Sources familiar with the investigation said that eye witnesses provided a description of Lanza, who was also seen at a different bar where he paid with a credit card.

A blood-thirsty commie pig drinking on his daddy’s credit card: imagine my shock.

This guy is apparently a faggot as well.

This kind of cowardly violence is why Antifa must be confronted rather than debated. In a fair fight, they either run away or fold. They’re like a good poker player with a lousy hand: call their bluff and pull their card and you see how weak they really are.

These are the globalist auxiliary force. They don’t have any politics they believe in, they are driven by personal vendettas against individuals in the short term and non-Jewish white people/heterosexuals/Christians in the meta sense. They hate people, not ideas.

Which is why they must be confronted. With the elites and state (Antifa’s benefactors) losing grasp over power, it’s a matter of time until the people and communities they terrorize show them what everyone really thinks of them.

Kike rapist and kike rape defender

How is Lena Dunham famous?

She isn’t funny, has nothing intelligent to say, is a lousy actress and is physically repulsive to look at. The answer is: Jewish nepotism.

The career of Dunham’s shiksa equivalent would be stuck blogging on Tumblr while volunteering on weekends at her community theater…behind the curtains.

Yet this Jewess gets to star in her very own grotesque and poz’d HBO show Girls.

One hairy spidery hand washes the other, and Girls writer (((Murray Miller))) is being accused of rape.

Surely, one of America’s loudest proponents of rape hysteria and fatmenism will believe the accuser?

No dice, Goyim! Dunham chose racial loyalty to gender ideology – and other women are starting to notice.

Huffington Post:

Lena Dunham, the creator and star of HBO’s “Girls,” generated widespread controversy last week after issuing and then walking back a statement defending Murray Miller, a writer and producer on the show whom actress Aurora Perrineau said raped her when she was 17 and he was in his 30s.

In response, author Zinzi Clemmons, a contributor to Dunham’s online newsletter Lenny Letter, announced Saturday on Facebook that she would no longer write for the publication and urged women of color “to divest from Lena Dunham.”

Zinzi Clemmons: Person of 20-odd percent color.

Clemmons offered examples of Dunham’s behavior and connections during college as further explanation for her decision, writing that she used to avoid Dunham and her circle of friends in college because of their “well-known racism.”

My statement on why I will no longer write for @lennyletter, and the behavior I witnessed firsthand from @lenadunham's friends.

It is time for women of color–black women in particular–to divest from Lena Dunham. pic.twitter.com/dxOWCLhTpA

— zinziclemmons (@zinziclemmons) November 19, 2017

“For all you writers who are outraged about what she did, I encourage you to do the same. Especially women of color. She cannot have our words if she cannot respect us,” Clemmons wrote in the post that she later shared on Twitter.

…

In her post, Clemmons said that she had known Dunham, as well as “Girls” co-star Jemima Kirke, since they attended college. The author said Dunham’s friends were known for their “hipster racism, which typically uses sarcasm as a cover,” excusing racist statements as “just a joke.”

“Most of these acquaintances were like Lena―wealthy, with parents who are influential in the art world,” she wrote. “They had a lot of power and seemed to get off on simultaneously wielding it and denying it.”

A representative for Dunham did not immediately return a request for comment.

When Perrineau came forward with her story on Friday, Dunham and Konner defended Miller.

The 17-year-old shiksa that was asking for it.

“While our first instinct is to listen to every woman’s story, our insider knowledge of Murray’s situation makes us confident that sadly this accusation is one of the 3 percent of assault cases that are misreported every year,” they wrote in a statement. “It is a true shame to add to that number, as outside of Hollywood women still struggle to be believed. We stand by Murray and this is all we’ll be saying about this issue.”

So Jews don’t believe their own bullshit. Feminism, like every other dogmatic cult Jews invented in the 1960s, is just a way to deconstruct society so Jews can rise and rule unchallenged.

Jews also don’t like black people. The average Jewish “liberal” sees blacks in a worse light than even the Alt-Right. All we want is to be left alone. Jews want to rule over blacks and use them to torment, browbeat and butcher whites.

You’d think almost 70 years after the descendants of Trotsky and other communist serial killers created Israel, it wouldn’t have taken this long. But better late than never.

Jews putting tribalism over ideology is not unique to Dunham. Here is a clip from the Bill Maher show featuring five anti-white leftist Jews (yes, all five are Jews!) rationalizing and protecting Al Franken. They blame everything from “society” to “white men with power” while demanding people stop overreacting.

We also saw how Gloria Allred and her daughter instinctively came to the aid of Harvey Weinstein (the daughter was his legal counsel until forced to resign by too many Goyim knowing).

The whole point of feminism and sex harassment hysteria is to gaslight white men into anxiety about interacting with women.

Meanwhile the Jews setting up this frame for you and me are doing the most disgusting and unspeakable things to their interns and young female colleagues, in many cases even committing rapes and assaults. If you want to delve into the pathological rabbit hole that is Jewish sexuality, go and read “Portnoy’s Complaint” by the Jewish novelist Philip Roth.

Jewish men see Gentile women as animals to sexually humiliate. Jewish women – often leading feminists – are there to indulge and enable them. It’s really that simple. 

(((Matthew Landen))), the owner of pro-Antifa Haymarket Whisky Bar in Kentucky, is being accused of tying a female J-left activist up, raping her, and then taking a dump on her face!

The bougie bar is popular with assholes from groups like Anti-Racist Action and other offshoots. Haymarket has hosted a number of Antifa events like “Rock Against Racism” and gotten “stellar reviews” from Louisville hipster gentrifiers. The chutzpah is so great, this guy even uses communist lingo to sling his overpriced liquor.

Wow, Nostradamus could not have imagined my shock!

A Jewish real life version of Milhouse Van Houten meets Sideshow Bob – dedicating his life to keeping white people in Kentucky down using his money and the local Orphans – is alleged to defecate on their sisters and daughters as well.

Let’s see if Luke O’Brien or Andrew Morantz will try to profile and psychoanalyze one of their own. Plenty to work with!

Eater.com:

The staff of Louisville’s five-year-old Haymarket Whiskey Bar have effectively shut down the bar — by refusing to show up for work — after owner Matthew Landan became the subject of a rape accusation that surfaced on social media. “I will comfortably say that every employee refused to open the bar and quit,” manager Eric Snider told Eater when reached for comment. “But we all would like the focus to be on the victims and the crime. Not us. We aren’t important here.”

The walkout was held in response to multiple sexual misconduct allegations against Landan that have surfaced since November 13. On that date, Westley Moore posted a public Facebook message under the still-trending #MeToo hashtag, in which she claims that Landan raped her, clarifying in the comment thread on the post that it allegedly happened in 2013. “Some friends know this already, and I feel it’s time for the rest of you to know and make a stand,” she writes. Eater has reached out to Moore, but has not heard back.

The Facebook post has over 750 shares and over 1,200 reactions, and seems to have kicked off a swift response towards Landan and the bar. On November 14 and 15, multiple staff members posted to Facebook that they no longer were working for Haymarket “under Matthew Landan’s ownership.” Several musicians, DJs, and other groups who performed at the venue have publicly announced they will no longer do business with the bar, and a public protest is planned for Friday evening, in what the organizer describes as a “show of support to those women brave enough to come forward and those who have been silenced.”

That line refers to other women who, inspired by Moore’s post, came forward with their own allegations against Landan in recent days. At least two more misconduct allegations against Landan are currently posted on Facebook.

Eater has reached out to Landan for a comment and has not heard back; the restaurant’s website and Facebook page are no longer active. Former Eater Louisville editor Zach Everson noticed that Landan had posted a statement on his personal Facebook page that has since been taken down, in which Landan describes Moore’s allegations as “serious, false, malicious, and defamatory.”

Well, there you have it.

“Intersectional feminism” is a ploy to separate women from their natural guardians and protectors (their fathers, brothers and potential husbands) so that Jews and sociopathic soyboys (of the Vice Media type) can weasel into their panties – and in some cases, literally shit on them.

Why not? If these women spend all their time rejecting gender roles meant to protect their welfare and attacking real men, all they are is confused, weak and mentally ill prey.

Then again, there is also a possibility that this woman is lying and the activity was consensual, but with multiple others coming forward to accuse Mr. Landen, he seems to have stopped denying the allegations, pulled the hull down and lawyered up.

Nevertheless, this nasty stuff and abuse is common in these nihilistic J-left circles. Whenever you have large groups of mentally ill people getting together, they only compound one another’s problems. The dreadlock wearing porn hoes like Moldylocks don’t go from small town girl to mindlessly violent junky overnight. It’s a process of degradation that begins with their Jew and Antifa professors in the university system.

Next time you see an Antifa slut, ask the condescending question they always ask you: who (Jewish or male feminist cuckboi) hurt you? 

I don’t play video games much anymore, but even though Call of Duty: WWII is a story told from the American point of view, it looks like it might be an interesting historical experience.

But not everyone feels that way.

One Jew who played through the game has written an angry and unhinged rant about how it doesn’t include gas chambers and it shows a few (of millions) German soldiers as human beings. He furiously juxtaposes Call of Duty with the perverse sadism-infused J-left fantasy game Wolfenstein II (which has seen abysmal sales compared to COD: WWII).

It’s fitting that he makes this comparison. Call of Duty: WWII is a game attempting to tell a believable story based on real life events, so of course there is no mention of gas chambers. Maybe this Jew reads the term “historical fiction” literally? What Jews claim happened in World War II is a fantasy tale that can only be portrayed in a whimsical and transparently white-hating political universe like (((Robert Altman’s))) latest iteration of Wolfenstein.

The butt-hurt Jew Alex Kubas-Meyer at J-left astroturf site Daily Beast is literally shaking!

The Daily Beast:

Only in 2017 can a video game advertisement proclaiming, “Make America Nazi-Free Again” provoke controversy.

Only now could a new game from a decades-old series spark a backlash for the celebration of what it has always been: a Nazi murder simulator. World War II fell out of fashion as the setting for first-person shooters ever since Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare set its sights on the present day, and that was largely because it seemed like the Nazi-fighting thing was all played out. This was for the best, since Nazis in video games are generally just lazy shorthand for “bad guys.” You don’t need to develop your antagonists if they’re Nazis because everyone knows they’re evil. Eventually, players realized how uninteresting this was, and the Third Reich disappeared from the mainstream for about a decade. But then Nazis came back in the real world and have been pushing to make themselves mainstream, so it’s fitting that they are now, again, digital enemy No. 1.

Wolfenstein II and Call of Duty: WWII are the latest installments in storied franchises. Wolfenstein 3D popularized the first-person shooter genre, and Call of Duty has largely defined the genre as it exists today. Released within a week of each other, these games come saddled with political context that neither developer could have foreseen. I will admit that, while America is having conversations about whether it’s OK to punch a Nazi in the face, it’s nice to have new games that let me punch them in the face with bullets.

The two are about as different as first-person shooters can be. Call of Duty is historical fiction, more or less following actual battles across Europe; Wolfenstein takes place in an alternate 1960s where Nazis not only won World War II but have since taken over the United States. One documents a platoon of men who storm the beaches of Normandy, and the other follows a man who single-handedly brings a nuclear bomb into a Texan Nazi base and detonates it. Over the past few years, Call of Duty has gone in some crazy directions, culminating in last year’s space-set Infinite Warfare, and those games look more like Wolfenstein than they do this new back-to-basics Call of Duty. It’s a conflicting change, though, because while it was probably necessary to tone some of the craziness down, WWII goes too far in the other direction. In trying to hark back to the old days, the game arrives staid. And by featuring violence that feels sanitized compared to recent entries, WWII does little to portray the real evils of the Third Reich.

…

I imagine that the script of Call of Duty: WWII was written in a different time, one long before a white supremacist plowed his car into a crowd of protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, and before the president of the United States said there were “some very fine people on both sides” of that incident. I like to imagine that someone looked back on the script after Charlottesville and cringed when they remembered the line “They’re not all bad.” Your character says it after driving by a group of dead Nazis. Someone makes a joke, and you cut them off to give the dead Nazis some credit. Because… what? Why? Maybe there could be something interesting there, were someone daring enough to dig into it, but it’s just thrown out there, everyone sort of agrees, and then we get on with it. What a pull quote: “Nazis. They’re not all bad” —Call of Duty: WWII.

In Wolfenstein, on the other hand, the earliest moments feature the half-Jewish protagonist’s not-Jewish father attacking him for playing with an African-American girl. He is a monster. So are the Klansmen who openly and eagerly wear their hoods around the Nazi-occupied American towns. So is the Nazi official who kills someone trying to help you while you’re tied up, forces a gun into your mouth, and asks how the gunpowder that killed your friend tastes. In Wolfenstein, they are the same. No subtlety. No shades of gray. It’s so over-the-top that it stops being funny and starts being disturbing again. And that’s what it should be. It should be uncomfortable to watch awful things; to pretend that they don’t exist is worse.

So, we return to Call of Duty, which shies away each time it hints at the true horrors of Nazism. A mission titled “Death Factory” might lead one to believe that it takes place in a concentration camp but instead, it’s just a forest. I continued to hold out the slightest bit of hope that Robbins hadn’t misled us all. After hours of waiting, the liberation came. Here, I thought, it must be time. But alas, no. Over a digital map and a few small images, you hear the same bad voice-acting you’ve been dealing with all game: “I thought I knew what cruelty was.” That’s all he could come up with. In the epilogue, you do see a camp, but it’s deserted. It’s been set on fire. “They wanted to hide whatever happened here,” someone says. But “they” aren’t the Nazis; “they” are WWII’s developers. They chose to use a POW labor camp, where there are implications of atrocities aimed at soldiers, not civilians. They chose to depict a World War II without gas chambers.

So in case you didn’t realize it by now, Jews who make games like Wolfenstein II see the 1-dimensional “bad guys” as stand ins for you, me and any white person (including Trump Deplorables) who isn’t a tranny or a Shabbos-Goy (Jews will kill them last).

Jews fantasize about slowly torturing us to death and seek to get enough people in the real world used to the idea through stupid video games.

Remember, all of this hate sprouts purely from the fact that we reject what Jews have planned for us and want them to leave us alone. Jews believe it is their god-given right to exploit, rape, and kill us, and that an objection to this is a default on our right to live!

But Jews better watch out. Now that they are in power they refuse to even recognize that we’re human, much less that we have grievances that are both logical and morally sound. But can this power dynamic last forever? History is fluid.

Jews love to pretend they are unique victims of history, but if you don’t consider non-Jews to be human, why complain about the taste of your own medicine? Jews are a numerical speck that behaves like Darth Vader. But just because we Westerners restrain ourselves from showing you a mirror doesn’t mean our patience will last forever.

sux men in media hate women yet write abt feminism n masquerade as allies but its sadder this happens. 2015 i screamed @ my own reflection pic.twitter.com/RGERURFwnb

— helena (@helenadonahue) October 6, 2017

Mainstream journalism and entertainment is shallow garbage. That’s because it is totally run by Jews and J-leftist middle men who give skanks a leg up (pun intended) in exchange for a bang.

The fags are doing it too. Notice how the newest crop of male actors have pretty faces and big muscles but lack the talent and charisma of Christian Bale or even Sylvester Stallone?

But now the chickens are coming home to roost. The latest scandal involves special snowflakes aggressively ruffling around in that detestable bougie Vice snow globe. It appears that “male feminist ally” Michael Hafford (who a few years ago penned an “ironic” post mocking insincere male feminist “allies” for Vice) was in fact doing exactly what everyone assumes all cuckbois are trying to do.

My shock. Even Roald Dahl could not have imagined it!

Jezebel:

On October 6, Helen Donahue, who previously worked as a social media editor for Vice and also wrote for the website, posted photos of bruises on her upper body, neck, and face to Twitter. “sux men in media hate women yet write abt feminism n masquerade as allies but its sadder this happens,” she wrote. “2015 i screamed @ my own reflection.”

Shortly after, another writer named Deirdre Coyle quoted Donahue’s tweet, writing “these bruises came from the same guy who physically forced me to do cocaine during sex.” And yet another woman known on Twitter by her first name, Dilara, quoted Coyle’s tweet, writing: “This is the same guy who choked me at the foot of his stairs until I passed out and then repeatedly punched me in the face.”

All three women confirmed to each other privately that the man they were referring to was writer Michael Hafford, a former freelance columnist for Broadly and freelance writer for outlets like Refinery29, Rolling Stone, T Magazine and more. The rapper ka5sh, a friend of Donahue’s, also tweeted that Hafford was the man Donahue’s tweet was referring to.

Hafford’s column at Broadly, Vice’s site aimed at women, was “Male Feminist Here,” a satire of male feminism and allyship that ran for three months in 2015. (Disclosure: I also wrote a piece for Broadly in 2015.) “The Male Feminist knows how much the love of a good woman means. Hell, the Male Feminist would settle for grudging acceptance,” Hafford wrote in the first edition of the column. “Not that he’s desperate. He just loves being around women, you know?”

Donahue was first emboldened to come forward on social media after a BuzzFeed investigation revealed that former Broadly editor Mitchell Sunderland had been emailing stories to Milo Yiannopolous to mock via Breitbart. The day after BuzzFeed’s story came out, Vice’s HR was first made aware of allegations around Hafford’s behavior through these Twitter posts, and “he was banned from contributing to any of the company’s properties,” a spokesperson wrote in an email to Jezebel. “Vice does not tolerate assault of any kind, or behavior that is disrespectful or offensive to any group or demonstrates bias or bigotry, and we took action as soon as we learned what happened. We continue to review the matter.”

Now, let’s practice some journalistic objectivity here: no man in history has ever had to “force” a woman to do free cocaine. Especially not a bitch who wears a bull ring and dog collar.

These allegations should be taken with a granule of blow, but they do expose power dynamics within some of the most powerful corporate media structures. Women always act like women no matter how many tattoos and (((Rosa Luxembourg))) texts they own.

And yes, men always act like men, no matter how low their testosterone is. The more weak a man is, the deeper pussy-power cuts them. Bugman Po-Mo consumerist-cuck factories like Vice are especially vulnerable to this.

The problem for the Michael Haffords of the world is that shitting where you eat will always come back to haunt you. When thots get jealous or realize your connection won’t carry their total lack of talent, they will get sour grapes and try to bring you down for attention.

These cuckbois have helped destroy our society and made healthy relationships all but impossible by giving these bitches spotlight and pretending like we should take their hysterical screeds seriously.

Now your karma check is here, pay up you faggoty nerds!

So Gainesville Antifa microbrewery Tall Paul’s got a novel idea for protecting the local idiocratic order: offer college students free beer for tickets to Richard Spencer’s speech.

Now an adult would hear about an event on the local University of Florida campus that they’re not interested in and simply not go. After all, every college aged alt-right guy has to deal with “deconstructing whiteness” seminars and tolerate organized communists occupying all the public spaces.

But at Tall Paul’s, they plan to give fellow J-leftists a frothy glass of liquid estrogen as a reward for taking away tickets from someone who isn’t a mental midget and might want to engage in political discourse with an alternative intellectual.

Not everyone has their ticket honored, however. Cameron Padgett, one of the guys organizing Spencer’s event, had his tickets rejected and was forcefully thrown out by the dirtbag bartenders.

I was discriminated against at Tall Paul's bar in Florida. They said 2 beers for one ticket to the @RichardBSpencer event. Not for me. 😂 pic.twitter.com/VQfx7Doh1F

— Cameron Padgett (@CameronVPadgett) October 18, 2017

ABC News:

A Florida brewing company is offering free beer to those who boycott a speech by white nationalist Richard Spencer scheduled to take place at the University of Florida on Thursday.

Alligator Brewing instructed people to trade in their tickets at Tall Paul’s Brew House for a free draft beer. The tickets will then be disposed of, “leaving two more empty seats in the Philips Center,” the brewery wrote on Instagram.

“Here at Alligator we believe free speech is a cornerstone of our great nation,” the company said in a statement posted to Instagram. “Speech that condones, let alone promotes racial supremacy has no home in America. And it sure as hell doesn’t have a home here in our beautiful town.”

The tickets are free and available to be picked up on the day of the event, The Independent Florida Alligator reported.

“We unfortunately can’t stop [Spencer] from bringing his hate to Gainesville, but we can empty the room so his disgusting message goes unheard,” the brewery wrote.

So the J-left – once known for its big brains – has been reduced to know-nothing boneheads. They don’t have an argument or an intellectual defense for the status quo they gatekeep or profit from, they just act like neurotic puritanical sissies and throw sucker punches when you’re not looking.

The problem is the corporate media – thankfully dying – is all too happy to oblige this publicity stunt with a national platform.

Tall Paul’s already has a moderately low rating on Yelp. Lots of complaints about their staff being arrogant scumbags and making college kids pay $10 bucks for a lousy “cocktail.”

Students want a pool table, mozzarella sticks and $6 dollar Svedka-shot-with-a-Bud specials, not overpriced “craft beer” made by pretentious hipster faggots. Especially not when each $12 dollar “libation” comes with a side of Jewish busybody activism.

If you agree with me and happen to frequent Tall Paul’s, make sure to leave a review expressing your outrage at their hatred for intellectual debate, free speech, and people who aren’t J-left trust fund assholes.

• Yelp
• Google+ (google them and click their review page)
• Facebook

(Do not leave threats or racial comments)