See: Doctors and Scientists Blaming Coronavirus for Vax-Induced Spike in Deadly Cancers

Let’s make all the shots into a mega shot, and people have to get them every day or they go to prison?

This will save humanity.

CNN:

There could be a combined Covid-19 and flu shot in our future, although it won’t be ready for this year’s flu season.

On Monday, vaccine maker Moderna announced positive late-stage trial results for its Covid-flu combination vaccine it calls mRNA-1083.

Calling the outcome of the late-stage trial “breakthrough results,” Moderna’s Chief Medical Affairs Officer Francesca Ceddia told CNN that people in the trial who got mRNA-1083 showed an improved immune response compared with those who got the standalone flu and Covid vaccines that are available now. The results were true even for people in the trial who were 65 years and older. Generally, older people don’t mount as robust a response to vaccines as younger people do.

“When we think about the combination vaccine, we often only think about the element of convenience, one shot instead of two, but what is really, really breakthrough is the fact that you not only offer that advantage, you also offer the proof of clinical benefit. I think this is the most important message,” Ceddia said.

Other companies have been testing a combined Covid-flu vaccine, but Moderna is the first to announce positive late-stage trial results.

Public health leaders say the world could use more ways to protect people from both viruses. Millions of people get sick with the flu and now Covid every year. For the last flu season, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 35 to 64 million people got sick with the flu in the United States. Between 390,000 and 810,000 people were so sick they were hospitalized and up to 71,000 people died. Just for last fall and winter, Covid sent more than a half-million people in the US to the hospital and killed 40,000, according to data presented last week to the US Food and Drug Administration’s independent vaccine advisers, who were discussing how to update Covid vaccines for the fall.

…

Few people got the latest Covid shot, studies show. Only about 25% of the eligible population has received the latest Covid-19 vaccine, according to a presentation to the FDA last week. Many more adults got the flu shot with nearly half of the adult population getting one last season, according to the CDC, a number that was slightly higher than the year before.

I feel the need to remind everyone: the unvaxed are not dying.

For whatever that is worth.

People who did not take the “vaccine” are not dying.

I’ve yet to come across anyone who regretted not taking it.

“While the pandemic is obviously over, the virus is not gone,” says Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel. “People are at a higher risk of getting hospitalized for COVID than because of the flu.” pic.twitter.com/Uzcz5Pd2WS

— Squawk Box (@SquawkCNBC) June 10, 2024

The government/media is constantly talking about “the next pandemic” as a foregone conclusion.

This means “the next time we decide to lock you in your houses and force you to wear these masks and get injected with deadly gene therapy shots.”

There was no first pandemic. A pandemic isn’t even plausible.

The Guardian:

Influenza is the pathogen most likely to trigger a new pandemic in the near future, according to leading scientists.

An international survey, to be published next weekend, will reveal that 57% of senior disease experts now think that a strain of flu virus will be the cause of the next global outbreak of deadly infectious illness.

The belief that influenza is the world’s greatest pandemic threat is based on long-term research showing it is constantly evolving and mutating, said Cologne University’s Jon Salmanton-García, who carried out the study.

“Each winter influenza appears,” he said. “You could describe these outbreaks as little pandemics. They are more or less controlled because the different strains that cause them are not virulent enough – but that will not necessarily be the case for ever.”

Details of the survey – which involved inputs from a total of 187 senior scientists – will be revealed at European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) congress in Barcelona next weekend.

The next most likely cause of a pandemic, after influenza, is likely to be a virus – dubbed Disease X – that is still unknown to science, according to 21% of the experts who took part in the study. They believe the next pandemic will be caused by an as-yet-to-be-identified micro-organism that will appear out of the blue, just as the Sars-CoV-2 virus, the cause of Covid-19, did, when it started to infect humans in 2019.

Wait, I thought they were saying “Disease X” is going to be the flu. Now the flu is more likely than Disease X?

What does any of this mean? Who reads this and thinks it makes sense?

Swine Flu Pandemic fraud of [1976] [60 Minutes]Mike Wallace expose. Swine flu [also known as H1N1] The Swine flu Pandemic has been named as the “most ambitious scam and corruption of our time” after big pharma was found to be in bed with the World Health Organisation.👇 pic.twitter.com/NGPOLbPSvb

— Bill Hicks 🇳🇿NZ (@HicksKiwi) April 17, 2024

Put every single one of these Bastards in Prison for Life.

“It’s Official: We Can Pretty Much Treat Covid Like the Flu Now…”

These Cunts forced our World to be injected with a ‘Experimental Vaccine’ for a fucking ‘Flu’?

Noooooo fucking Amnesty. pic.twitter.com/fiMjyYO2e3

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) March 1, 2024

Oh.

So it turns out the whole coronavirus thing was not really a problem in the first place?

Interesting that Andrew Anglin was totally right about that and the government is now admitting it.

The Guardian:

Americans who test positive for Covid-19 no longer need to stay in isolation for five days, US health officials announced on Friday.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed its longstanding guidance, saying that people can return to work or regular activities if their symptoms are mild and improving and it has been a day since they have had a fever.

The change comes at a time when Covid-19 is no longer the public health menace it once was. It dropped from being the nation’s third leading cause of death early in the pandemic to 10th last year.

Most people have some degree of immunity to the coronavirus from past vaccinations or from infections. And many people are not following the five-day isolation guidance anyway, some experts say.

…

Covid-19 is not causing as many hospitalizations and deaths as it did in the first years of the pandemic. The change is an effort to streamline recommendations so they are similar to longstanding recommendations for flu and other respiratory viruses. Many people with a runny nose, cough or other symptoms are not testing to distinguish whether it is Covid-19, flu or something else, officials say.

Well, the tests are just arbitrary anyway. So there is no reason to test.

See: Coronavirus is Literally Just the Flu

People with Covid whose symptoms are improving and have been fever-free for 24 hours without medication can return to work, school or other public places, US health officials said.

The CDC issued new US guidelines Friday https://t.co/3CPfOnhWyz pic.twitter.com/pH6ICeYeSq

— Bloomberg TV (@BloombergTV) March 1, 2024

Previously: Coronavirus is Literally Just the Flu

As we’ve said a million, trillion times: they just renamed “the flu” as “covid-19.”

If that isn’t obvious to everyone at this point, it never will be.

The Guardian:

Last month, a small group of international scientists met to decide an issue critical to the health of millions of people all over the planet. For once, it wasn’t about coronavirus, although these experts know a lot about that, too. The task in hand was to save us from a bug we’ve been fighting since before the days of Hippocrates, the first doctor to describe it in 400BC. It’s an adversary potentially as much of a threat as Covid. These scientists are the flu hunters – heads of a handful of international institutions who track this old foe as it evolves and disperses in its own fight for survival.

This crucial annual meeting was held, for the first time since Covid struck, in the plateglass anonymity of the World Health Organization building in Geneva, with a few participants on Zoom. The scientists came armed with mountains of data and decades of experience to decide which four strains of the flu virus circling the globe should be in the next flu vaccine, to protect us from illness and our healthcare systems from buckling. Each has their own opinion and there can be wrangling and even some political positioning. Experts from China, the US, Australia, Japan and Russia are involved. It’s not always easy. But on 25 February, with what surely ought to have been a white puff of pontifical smoke, they made their recommendation public. Many thousands of lives will be saved – if they have got it right.

…

“There are periods in which we’re very busy and periods in which we’re extremely busy,” McCauley says. He patiently explains the complexities of the virus, with just an occasional flash of suppressed irritation at this interruption to his lifesaving work. He strides briskly in his white coat between his small glass office overlooking the institute’s atrium and the dark, closed-off labs behind it. Entry to the labs is restricted whenever there is live flu virus around.

In January, the trickle of flu virus samples becomes a flood. Cardboard boxes containing the evidence of its latest mutations are brought in and transferred to freezers at -80C, where they will last for a couple of weeks while lab staff get to work. For what they have to do, the word “testing” is inadequate, McCauley’s frown makes clear. It’s about “isolating the virus, propagating the virus, doing the genetic analysis, doing the antigenic analysis, doing the drug resistance analysis, on all of these,” he says. McCauley must work out how the virus is changing so that he can inform the February meeting.

This year something unusual has been happening. There has hardly been any flu for the past two winters. There’s even speculation that some strains have vanished completely. But the flu hunters know better than to underestimate their enemy. If you can’t see it just now, it’s probably only hiding. Flu is a killer. It’s not just a bad cold. Man flu is – well, not flu. If you’re at work and think you’ve got flu, you probably haven’t. A proper bout will keep you in bed for days, unable to do much more than moan. Without vaccines, it would regularly scythe through the population, and occasionally cause pandemics, as it did in 1918, when it killed at least 20 million people (Covid has so far killed an estimated 6 million). And it’s a complicated, slippery foe, one that is very good at evolving or mutating to escape vaccines.

…

In some respects, we are getting on top of flu. Conall Watson, a UKHSA epidemiologist, talks of “really positive developments in flu vaccinations”. He means the introduction of the adjuvant influenza vaccine, which gives older people’s immune systems a boost to help them respond and produce antibodies to the strains in the jab. “We’ve got evidence that it is preventing hospitalisations, but one of the really big steps the UK took was the introduction of a school-age and toddler vaccination programme,” he says, “with the idea of using vaccines to reduce community transmission.”

And the mRNA technology that has proved so successful in the Covid pandemic, used in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, is likely to be the future for flu vaccines as well. The companies are now looking to see how they can adapt it. We know mRNA vaccines can be fairly swiftly altered if a serious new coronavirus variant turns up. We could see a scenario where both the Covid and flu vaccines are redesigned every year, depending on the prevailing strains.

Will we ever get to a point where we don’t have to worry about flu? “No,” Zambon says, without hesitation, “because the natural reservoir for influenza A is wild birds.” They take the virus around the globe and there is nothing we can do about it. “So it will always be a threat to the human population.”

Which means that our best hope will continue to be vaccines. We are in the hands of the flu hunters.

Yeah, so – the flu is gone, but the vaccines for the coronavirus were so very effective, that we need coronavirus vaccines for the flu that is gone.

Pfizer makes a lot of money.

In March 30, 2020, Andrew Anglin wrote an article titled “Coronavirus is Literally Just the Flu,” but little did he know that the deadly coronavirus couldn’t have been the flu, because the flu was on a vacation.

Now The Science has revealed that in 2021, the flu took another vacation.

AP:

The U.S. flu season has arrived on schedule after taking a year off, with flu hospitalizations rising and two child deaths reported.

Last year’s flu season was the lowest on record, likely because COVID-19 measures — school closures, distancing, masks and canceled travel — prevented the spread of influenza, or because the coronavirus somehow pushed aside other viruses.

“This is setting itself up to be more of a normal flu season,” said Lynnette Brammer, who tracks flu-like illnesses for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The childhood deaths, Brammer said, are “unfortunately what we would expect when flu activity picks up. It’s a sad reminder of how severe flu can be.”

During last year’s unusually light flu season, one child died. In contrast, 199 children died from flu two years ago, and 144 the year before that.

The flu disappeared, and everyone who got symptoms of the flu actually suffered from coronavirus. Also, everyone who’d have died of the flu died of coronavirus.

But this is somehow a very serious and very deadly situation.

Nearly 18 months ago now, I stated that the so-called coronavirus was simply a rebranding of the flu and other respiratory viruses. This has continued to play out, and been proved true.

The PCR test has been confirmed to be a scam. The creator of the test said explicitly that the test could not be used to test for infectious disease

Even if you go read about the PCR test for infectious disease and decide it makes sense, it is Lord Fauci himself who said that any cycle count over 35 would create a false positive.

“If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period,” Fauci told “This Week in Virology” on a July 16, 2020 podcast. Although Fauci has repeatedly gone back and changed things he’d said, but he hasn’t changed his statement on this issue.

On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a piece entitled “Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.,” where they admitted that in the states they looked at, 90% of tests were effectively false positives due to the cycle count.

(Start at about 4:00.)

This issue then quickly disappeared from the public discussion. The way it works now is that the health authorities – i.e., the government of any country – changes the number of cycles they do based on how many positives they want. And of course, the rule remains that anyone who tests positive for the virus is put down as having died from the virus. So both the case count and death count can be easily modified arbitrarily.

After the vaccines began spreading, the CDC announced that they would be using different cycle counts for vaxxed and unvaxxed people. (He’s a “fact checker” admitting that and saying it doesn’t matter “because of science,” without mentioning that Fauci himself made the above statements. They interview a guy who says 40 or 45 is fine.)

They said that only the “low” cycle count of less than 29 cycles would be accepted for those who have been vaxxed. The previous standard was, as show above, 35 or over. And they specifically said in these new guidelines will only apply to the vaccinated.

Of course, the alleged “variants” of this new virus that doesn’t actually exist are being “discovered” using ultra high cycle rates, and then “tested” using high cycle rates.

Basically, it is very easy for them to use these tests to create any single narrative they want to create. If they want to say the vaxx is working, they lower the rate, as they’ve already done. If they want to say a new variant of the virus is breaking through the vaxx, they up the rate. If people are dying from the vaxx, they up the rate and give them a positive PCR test.

I’m not claiming to be a scientist here. I’m not making any bold statements. I am simply able to understand that these people themselves say that anything about 35 is positive, and yet they continue to use that number of cycles in testing regularly, unless they want the case count to go down, in which case they issue a guidance saying “nothing over 28.” This is very straightforward. You don’t need to be a scientist.

The Real Coronavirus

As far as finding some kind of coronavirus – we noted all the way back in July of 2020 that the CDC had published this on their website:

A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.

You can read more about this by simply looking up “false positive common cold.”

The common cold, you see, is a coronavirus.

The description of an infection from a common cold on the CDC website is identical to what is called “a mild case of covid-19.”

So although the PCR cycling makes a real positive test unnecessary, it is in theory possible that a PCR test could bring up a real positive – it would just be the common cold.

Most of the “serious cases of coronavirus” that you see on TV with people in the hospital the the flu combined with a false test. In 2018, 80,000 people died from the flu, according to the CDC. When you add in the fact that the CDC was in 2020 and 2021 mixing in heart attacks and cancer deaths with coronavirus deaths (go all the way up to motorcycle crashes…!), there is no need for a new virus to explain what we are seeing. In fact, if a new virus did exist, it would be redundant, as it would only be killing people who otherwise would have died from the something else.

To this day, no evidence has been presented for a pandemic of any kind. There also remains no actual evidence of any new virus. From start to finish, this is all fake.

Even people critical of the virus regime continue to false claim that a virus exists. Part of that is that right-wingers felt like they got a big win when the media came out and pushed the Wuhan Lab Leak Hoax. “Media admits that Trump was right!” is something that carries a lot of weight with these people, regardless of the content of the claim. But the other part is that people want to believe in the virus because they believe that completely inventing the concept that there is a virus is too big of a hoax, even for the hoax masters.

The reality is that the hoax will always be as big as they can get people to believe.

Think about it: they are telling you that the souls of girls can mistakenly enter the bodies of body, before birth, in some kind of metaphysical mixup. That is a much bigger hoax than simply looking at a category of existing diseases and saying “this is actually a new disease.”

People need to start calling this out, because it is only the truth that will set us free.

If you’ve bought into the lies, I understand this is embarrassing, but we get nothing by continuing to play pretend.

This entire narrative of the coronavirus is utter bullshit.

The reason they said it came from China was because they got the first positive tests in China. They they admitted that there were earlier positive tests when they examined blood samples in Italy.

Now there are even earlier positive tests in America!

AP:

A new analysis of blood samples from 24,000 Americans taken early last year is the latest and largest study to suggest that the new coronavirus popped up in the U.S. in December 2019 — weeks before cases were first recognized by health officials.

The analysis is not definitive, and some experts remain skeptical, but federal health officials are increasingly accepting a timeline in which small numbers of COVID-19 infections may have occurred in the U.S. before the world ever became aware of a dangerous new virus erupting in China.

“The studies are pretty consistent,” said Natalie Thornburg of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“There was probably very rare and sporadic cases here earlier than we were aware of. But it was not widespread and didn’t become widespread until late February,” said Thornburg, principal investigator of the CDC’s respiratory virus immunology team.

What? The virus started spreading more after we started testing for it and trying to stop it with lockdowns, masks, and social distancing?

That doesn’t make sense.

How come this virus is dangerous, but at the same time, you don’t realize that it’s around until you go crazy testing for it and talking about it?

They’re literally saying that the virus was free to do whatever it pleased without any kind of mask, lockdown, or social distancing mandate, but that at the same time, it somehow wasn’t widespread until the China and Italy media hysteria operation of early 2020.

A CDC-led study published in December 2020 that analyzed 7,000 samples from American Red Cross blood donations suggested the virus infected some Americans as early as the middle of December 2019.

The latest study, published Tuesday online by the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, is by a team including researchers at the National Institutes of Health. They analyzed blood samples from more than 24,000 people across the country, collected in the first three months of 2020 as part of a long-term study called “All Of Us” that seeks to track 1 million Americans over years to study health.

Like the CDC study, these researchers looked for antibodies in the blood that are taken as evidence of coronavirus infection, and can be detected as early as two weeks after a person is first infected.

The researchers say seven study participants — three from Illinois, and one each from Massachusetts, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — were infected earlier than any COVID-19 case was originally reported in those states.

One of the Illinois cases was infected as early as Christmas Eve, said Keri Althoff, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the study’s lead author.

We do not know that “the coronavirus” even exists as it has been presented.

Most likely:

• They developed a PCR test for a cold virus that already existed
• They started mass testing, while also fudging the tests while running too many cycles PCR
• They attributed any and all respiratory illness to the cold virus with or without a real or fake test

That is the theory that takes in every element of what we’ve seen, and continues to make coherent sense.

There is no single thing that has happened that cannot be explained within that theory of what has gone on over the last year and a half.

If you go to the CDC website, you can read about the fact that the common cold is a coronavirus.

The people who died “from coronavirus” mostly died from the flu, like tens of thousands of people die from the flu every year. Others had heart attacks, cancer, or some other serious condition, and died from that and were labeled coronavirus deaths. Still others died from falling off ladders, in car crashes, or from gunshot wounds, and were recorded as coronavirus deaths.

This is a meme Anglin made well over a year ago:

There is no way that this was a random event, because everything was so meticulously planned – the way they took everyone’s freedoms, stole the election, collapsed the economy, transferred wealth to billionaires. If you believe all of that was just a lucky coincidence, then you are beyond help.

And there isn’t some bioweapon virus. There are no new deaths in any country that doesn’t have socialized medicine (where I suspect they’re lying and even if they’re not, the new deaths are very small and could have some other cause related to the lockdown itself). Johns Hopkins University admitted in an official publication that there were no new deaths in America during the supposed height of the “pandemic,” and that “coronavirus deaths” were just other causes of death being reclassified.

This is all a complete hoax.

Just think about it: are they going to retcon blaming China for the virus, now that the experts are claiming it was in America before it was in China? If not, then what even is all of this?

It is just a narrative.

(Note: YouTube is continually deleting this video, apparently having created a new rule that even doctors and scientists are not allowed to disagree with the media’s narrative about the coronavirus or the lockdown. If it is gone by the time you are reading this article, you can search on Google for “Dr. Erickson press conference” and try to find a reupload, or watch it on the free speech video website Bitchute.)

Drs. Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi, co-owners of Accelerated Urgent Care, a Bakersfield, California clinic which is the only private walk-in COVID-19 testing site in the city, held a press conference on April 22 to explain their conclusions about COVID-19 test results to the imbecilic plebs who believe in this idiot hoax.

People seem to care a whole helluva lot about what “the experts” say. Well, these men, like Dr. John Ioannidis of Stanford, are most certainly experts, and they are calling this whole thing bullshit.

What’s more, Dr. Erickson appears to be a homosexual, which means he’s in a high-risk group which also tends to be germaphobic, which actually brings more emotional weight to his arguments.

Some key takeaways from the press conference:

• We have never quarantined the healthy, the basic concept makes no sense. We are supposed to quarantine the sick.
• We should follow the actual scientific data, rather than saying we’re “doing science” and just making up absurd claims.
• Based on actual scientific data, in the state of California, you have a 0.03% chance of dying from COVID-19.
• 92% of those diagnosed with the virus recover.
• Millions of cases, small amount of death.
• Sweden and Norway, two countries that are right next to each other where one locked down and the other didn’t, did not experience vastly different results. This proves that this lockdown is not necessary.
• The lockdown is increasing the rate of child molestation and spousal abuse. Also, anxiety, depression, suicide. We’re having an economic collapse. The medical industry is going to be hit very hard economically.
• This virus is not different from the flu. There was a 0.13 chance of death from the flu in 2017. COVID-19 is lower than that. Everything about the virus is similar to the flu, if you actually look at the scientific data.
• The immune system develops by being exposed to pathogens. This weird attempt to avoid the virus is harming the natural development of the immune system. It is basic microbiology, immunology and common sense that you need exposure to germs to survive.
• Disease is going to spike when people reenter society.
• The lockdown doesn’t actually protect anyone, because they’re buying products from stores.
• It makes no sense that people are allowed to go to the grocery and not church. The virus is still being transferred widely, as the data demonstrates.
• These idiot plastic gloves people are wearing are helping the virus spread.
• It’s just the flu, bro.
• A bunch of deaths are being attributed to the virus that are not caused by the virus.
• Doctors are being pressured to add “Covid” to death reports.
• We’re going to have minimal hospital staff and significant disease whenever the lockdown ends.
• Dr. Erickson has talked to the majority of health officials in the state, and all agree the lockdown should be lifted.
• How does it make sense you can go shopping in a big corporate store and all small businesses are closed? This is not science in any way whatsoever.
• This should be treated like the flu. People with symptoms and people with high risk should stay home, everyone else should be allowed to live their lives normally.
• Going outside is healthy.
• No one at Home Depot is wearing a mask and you can go there. But you can’t go to the park and walk around alone.
• With the economy collapsed, homelessness is going to shoot up and millions of people’s lives are going to be ruined. We have to be more responsible.
• This is just like the flu.
• The flu has been killing people for 100 years.
• We’re not afraid of the flu because we’re familiar with it.
• We should be following DATA not these models.
• They agree with the initial response, because the nature of the virus wasn’t known. But now we know.
• 90% of people who die die with co-morbidity (other contributing factors).
• The news has a skewed view because they are still working and getting paid.
• The government doesn’t have a right to decide what is “safe.” When they say “safe,” they mean “control.”
• This is all going to end in violence.

These are the people who are dealing with the actual data in a clinical setting, and they are saying the same exact thing I’ve been saying for six weeks.

At this point, I’m really just proving my point and informing people of what the truth of this matter is, and how completely bamboozled we’ve been by this lunatic media hoax. Because unlike these gentlemen, I do not believe that opening up now is going to solve anything. It will be better for the mental and physical health of the people, of course, and may prevent the kind of health crisis they are talking about. But it certainly is not going to fix the economy.

That ship has already sailed.