Matt Walsh can’t reject an invitation by Tucker Carlson. He also can’t take a legitimate position on the Jews and Israel, because he works for Little Benny the Big Man. It’s a funny situation for Tucker, because he can just call this guy up whenever he wants and straight-up rat hole him.

This week, Walsh got the rat-holing of a lifetime, with Tucker moving to smoke him out, let loose the hounds, tickle him to tears, and finally, stroke the goat while giggling maniacally.

The fink Walsh was due for a heavy-handed rat-holing because he is indeed, my dearest reader, a rat fink. He is a fundamental part of the Ben Shapiro Jew Machine which is as simple as a simple shed person on serious pills and dreaming of a better tomorrow. The Jew rat Shapiro avoids getting chased into a hole and smoked out (hounded, etc.) by simply not engaging with anyone. He literally will not debate anyone who is going to bring up the points on Palestine. He will also hang up on live callers. His entire life is based around avoiding the hole.

The Shapiro Jew Machine works like this:

• Say basic things that conservatives agree with (mostly just about trannies or other people that literally everyone hates)
• Be a bit edgy and act like you’re doing something brave
• Get people to think “oh, I agree with this guy and I support him”
• Bombard them with Jewish propaganda
• The target who, at least before recently, probably hasn’t thought very much about Israel, assumes that they must also support Israel because the anti-tranny guy supports Israel

This is the single most obvious scam in the history of media scams. But it continues to work incredibly well. Or at least it did before Tucker Carlson came through like a whirlwind and started rat-holing people.

With Candace Owens having bullied Shapiro into firing her, Walsh is the last individual anyone even knows about who is aiding Shapiro in his Jew scheme. He babbles on about trannies (still) and says a bunch of racist stuff. But instead of adding the “I love Israel” part, he has an ostensibly “more masculine” bit where he says “I just don’t care, it has nothing to do with America.” That is of course retarded on its face, given that the United States pays for all of it.

I have never in my life heard Matt Walsh say something that was not totally obvious. He’s not even a particularly good talker. (As I prepare for my show, I can always tell myself, “well, umming or no, I’m already better than Matt Walsh.”) But his curmudgeonly old lumberjack fake persona (seriously, find a picture of him without his beard and then tell me this is a “real man”) is apparently a selling point.

“This is on the other side of the world and it’s not my problem” sounds like a valid perspective. But it simply is not, because no one is talking about that, no one views it that way, and it is not that way. What we are talking about is the fact that the United States, with its biggest military ever and its infinity money, is backing this entire thing. Obviously, it wouldn’t be happening without the funding and military backing of the US. Israel is a small country, whereas Moslems are a quarter of the world’s population and could obviously easily wipe these people out in a few minutes. Egypt alone could wipe them out very fast. Frankly, Hamas and Hezbollah alone could probably do it within a few months of the US cutting the funding.

Therefore, there is no conversation about the war outside of the conversation of the US funding it, because if it were not for US funding, Israel would not exist at all, let alone be committing the most extreme genocide in history on a very public stage. Every issue involving Israel, therefore, is first and foremost an American issue, and therefore it is the responsibility of those involved in American politics to take a hard position on the issue.

What’s more, this is the most consequential issue for America and Americans, as it could literally totally destroy our country. This is without even going into the facts about everything else the Jews are doing in this country, but simply looking at Israel: because everyone in the world understands this is an American issue, the US is becoming a pariah state for its genocide. It is a universally hated country now. People used to love the US. Everyone now views it as totally satanic. This goes beyond simply being spat on as a tourist: this threatens the US economy. Objectively, US support for Israel is making Americans poorer, and that goes way beyond simply the tax dollars dumped into this project, and digs into America’s ability to operate on the world stage while causing total internal breakdown. It is infecting the social order, used as a justification for new forms of censorship we’ve never seen. Further, the US being sucked into a gigantic war on behalf of Israel is not at all outside the realm of possibility.

You cannot simply dance around this as an American political commentator. It is not simply a “cowardly” position, it is a position that makes you look retarded, as if you do not understand the most basic dynamics of US politics, which should make a person ask: “Why then are you a US political commentator?”

Obviously, the whole “support Israel, bigot!” thing is not really working very well anymore. These people are trying other strategies. If you listen to Nick Fuentes, he tells you “Israel is the same as Russia” (he claims without evidence that “Russia influences American policy” and therefore it’s the same as Israel). A lot of these people are talking about Moslems constantly now, because it is a lot easier to get people to hate Moslems than it is to get them to love the Jews. Frankly, Walsh’s “I don’t care, it’s not our problem” is not very popular, even though you would think on its face it would be. It’s because basically everyone, even the poorly informed, understand that when you talk about Israel, you are talking about an American issue.

Walsh is totally full of shit when he says that he “never cared about Israel.” He actually made a point to say “you can go back from before I worked at the Daily Wire and look at my old blog and see I never talked about Israel.” Although his old blog is deleted, we have some of the old posts archived, including this one:

This closes with the point:

But I do have a problem with the fools who would call you a Neo-Nazi because you’d rather that three billion a year stay in American households rather than Israeli politicians’ wallets.

…which demonstrates that, just like everyone else, he understands very well that Israel is an American issue, not a far-away foreign issue. Before senility, people do not generally get less informed as they age, so it is an absolute fact that Walsh developed these new views he has on Israel for financial gain.

He can’t argue that this was some youthful folly either. Aside from the fact that people do not typically lose connection to established facts as their views evolve (rather you perceive the facts to mean something different in light of new facts or a new perception, if indeed your views do change as you age), that blog is from 2013.

Oh wait, jeez. I was about to say “he was already in his forties at the time.” I just looked it up and he is thirty-nine (39) as of this date. What the hell, man? How did that happen? I guess that makes sense in terms of his career trajectory. I had generally assumed that he had some other job, took up blogging as a side thing, and then opportunities appeared. So, he was 27 when he published that blog.

Again, the blog is deleted. But according to his Wikipedia page, he was fired from conservative radio in 2013, not long after that blog was published. Who knows how hard he was going against Israel? The next year, he started working for Glenn Beck’s “The Blaze,” and then in 2017 started working for Ben Shapiro’s “Daily Wire.” And his understanding of the basic facts around Israel were forever changed.

(Note: I assume he must have at some point addressed the issue of money to Israel during the hullaballoo, wherein he’s attempted to ride the fence harder than anyone else, literally working for Ben Shapiro while appearing in friendly interviews with Tucker Carlson. However, whatever the mental gymnastics are on that one, the math is not convincing enough to work in prime time on Tucker Carlson, hence the fact that he didn’t bother to present it. My bet is that if pressed, he says “well, I don’t think foreign aid is a good idea in principle,” in which case someone would respond, “so then why don’t you say ‘my only concern is that the US should stop funding Israel,’ instead of ‘I don’t care’?”)

In terms of Tucker rat-holing him in this episode published on Friday, it could be an exaggeration to claim that he was tickled to tears and that the goat was stroked. It’s a bit of a reference to the old Stormer meme from years ago, which I just looked up.

Check the “Tucker Carlson” tag if you want more. I spent 30 minutes looking at them, with long breaks of laughter. This site used to be so funny. No wonder everyone hates me now.

Tucker made a point to not destroy him. He easily could have TIED HIM UP WITH RUSTY WIRES and PLUCKED HIS BEARD WITH PLIERS after Walsh tried to claim it is not an American issue. Instead, Tucker nicely said that he wasn’t talking about whatever Walsh was trying to frame it as but rather the support of the American right for a genocide.

By the way, the show before this, Tucker interviewed some UN woman about the fact that this is a genocide.

It was clear that Tucker wanted to keep the conversation as friendly as possible, and simply demonstrate his power to Ben Shapiro, i.e., “I’m in ur base, goat-stroking ur doodz.” As a more practical matter, it shows Walsh’s audience that Tucker’s views on Israel are acceptable. Shapiro claims they are not acceptable, that they are outside of allowed discourse, that there are not any circumstances under which US support for Israel can be questioned. So it was a power move, a way to prove that he has sway over all conservatives.

For the record, although I like Tucker, I do not truly trust him at all. In fact, I have a series that I have not published about what I see as his agenda. I don’t think it is likely that he is an intelligence agent, but he is playing a game that goes beyond what he is presenting. He’s deeply tied to JD Vance, who is in turn an agent of Silicon Valley. That whole scene is very dirty.

South Park’s newest season (which was for some reason listed as two separate seasons back to back) was unbelievably bad. I hadn’t watched the show in years, because who even thinks about South Park. I say that as someone deeply entrenched in the adult cartoon world, a very sick man who will turn on AI Futurama in the background and then say “this is good enough to sit down and actually watch in the foreground.” But South Park managed to hype themselves with hatred against the show, and I was interested to see where they went with it. It was indeed horrible. It’s all about Trump. Before this season, they’d signed a deal for $1.5 billion for 50 episodes, which averages out to about $1.3 million per minute. Good work if you can get it.

Frankly, I didn’t even mind that they attacked Trump. I think Trump’s attacks on free speech are a good reason to attack Trump with a TV show. They clearly wanted him to say something about it, though I think so few people are even aware of it that it just never crossed Trump’s radar. However, it was a lot of 1990s edginess, with gay sex and whatever. The whole thing felt very draining, even though JD Vance as Tattoo (from Fantasy Island) was somewhat inspired.

But the thing I wanted to mention was that they had Peter Thiel talking about the Antichrist.

This probably speaks to the extent to which this whole thing is currently embedded in the cultural awareness: that these Silicon Valley people are into something very weird, that they are using “JD Vance” (fake name, btw) as a vehicle to seize power.

If you’re thinking “oh he must not be going to even publish those articles he hyped up, if he was he wouldn’t be talking about it now,” you may be right. I went through them earlier today and it was kind of a mess. The sort of thing where typically, instead of editing, I would just rewrite from scratch. There are a handful of interesting facts which I don’t think are getting enough attention. You have just right out in the open this “Vance” character saying that he’s going to be the next president, and it is not in any way a secret that he’s a creature of Silicon Valley, of the gay guy who is talking about the Antichrist and running an AI spy machine clearly intended to establish the total AI nightmare world I’ve spent years describing, where each individual is targeted by their electronics, manipulated as if they’ve all got their own little Jolly West in their pocket. This ability to manipulate perceptions on a grand scale is much scarier than the police state implications of Palantir (which are scary enough).

It’s highly confusing why more people are not talking about this, and my premise is that it has a lot to do with Tucker Carlson. It’s hard to say the extent to which he is aware of what is obviously going on with Vance. The idea that Tucker is swayed by Vance simply writing a good book (which is not political) and then talking in broad platitudes about “working class populism,” and that this sway is so strong that it causes Tucker to deny the obvious, is hard to believe.

The other question is whether Tucker will throw Vance under the bus before the 2028 election cycle. That would certainly make the most logical sense. It would be crazy for Tucker to do all of this work and then step out of the way for Vance, who has done literally nothing but stand there looking fat, speaking aught but the broadest and most hallow platitudes with the gentility of a eunuch.

Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Steve Bannon has shocked a lot of people. Not me, sir. I was already aware of how weird all these people were.

Even if Tucker is just spilling the beans about the Jews as part of a broader plan to implant us all with microchips so Peter Thiel can alter our DNA and turn us into human robots to build his infernal Lazarus machines, it’s still nice to have the whole Jew thing out in the open like this.

If I could say one thing to Matt Walsh: “You ain’t no lumberjack, bruv.”

After two years of unparalleled war and slaughter, during which the Jews have committed the worst crimes ever recorded, they continue to disturb the peace through the spread of pernicious rumors.

Times of Israel:

Mexican authorities, with assistance from the United States and Israeli intelligence agencies, thwarted an alleged plot by Iran to assassinate the Israeli ambassador to Mexico, Israeli and US officials said Friday.

A US official said that the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps initiated the plot to kill Ambassador Einat Kranz Neiger in late 2024 and that it was disrupted this year. The plot allegedly included recruiting operatives out of Iran’s embassy in Venezuela, whose authoritarian left-wing president, Nicolas Maduro, has a tactical alliance with Tehran.

“The plot was contained and does not pose a current threat,” the US official said in a statement to reporters on condition of anonymity. “This is just the latest in a long history of Iran’s global lethal targeting of diplomats, journalists, dissidents and anyone who disagrees with them, something that should deeply worry every country where there is an Iranian presence.”

The US official did not provide detailed evidence or say how the plot was contained.

…

The thwarted assassination attempt in Mexico showed Iran has a large-scale terror network in the region used for carrying out attacks on Israeli and US targets, the source said, adding that American officials believe many of the planned terror attacks are directed from Tehran’s embassy in Venezuela. Last month, Israel revealed that the IRGC was responsible for a string of attacks on Jewish sites in Western countries.

And then, everyone clapped.

First of all, it is never acceptable to make some ugly fat woman your ambassador to another country. Second, her name is “Crayons Nigger.” Forcing Mexico to accredit this woman is an act of aggression which could only have been conceived of by a sick Zionist mind.

The good people of Mexico refused to accept this heinous act, attempting to burn her palace down last May. Sadly, Israel refused to take the hint, and Mrs. Einat Kranz Neiger continues to occupy the embassy.

Iran has denied any plot to kill Crayons Nigger.

Al Jazeera:

Iran has branded accusations from the United States and Israel that it was hatching a plot to assassinate the latter’s ambassador to Mexico as “ridiculous”.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told reporters on Monday that Tehran believes Israel is trying to damage its “friendly relations” with other countries through an “absurd allegation”.

…

Iran’s embassy in Mexico on Monday called the accusation “a media intervention and a great lie” and said it considers “betraying Mexico’s interests to be betraying our own”.

Baghaei said: “Our embassy stated that we found this allegation so absurd and ridiculous that we did not even think it required an official response from the spokesperson.”

You may remember a similar “lmao, wait what?” situation having happened in Australia a few months back. (Probably, you don’t remember it. These things are designed to be forgettable. If people didn’t forget them, they might start keeping track.) But Iran remembers.

Baghaei was quick to point out that Israel has previously made similar accusations against Iran, citing attacks on Jewish synagogues in Australia in late 2024.

That appeared to be a reference to a testimony given by the New South Wales Police Force to the upper house of the Australian parliament in early October, which presented the result of an investigation into suspected Iranian links to 14 incidents of attacks on synagogues, graffiti, firebombings, and attacks on cars and homes.

“The NSW Police Force has nil holdings in relation to foreign agents perpetrating these incidents,” a police representative told lawmakers at the time.

“Despite official statements by Australian police rejecting any connection to Iran, Israel has continued to insist on Tehran’s involvement,” Baghaei said.

However, in late August, Australia accused Iran of directing two “anti-Semitic” arson attacks in the cities of Sydney and Melbourne and gave Tehran’s ambassador seven days to leave the country, the first such expulsion since World War II.

Canberra also designated the IRGC a “terrorist organisation” and withdrew its diplomats from Tehran.

At the time, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation had gathered credible evidence that Iran “orchestrated” last year’s attacks on a kosher restaurant and a synagogue, but did not release the evidence.

The Jews take great joy in portraying their enemies as cartoon villains fixated on ridiculously contrived plots to do nefarious but pointless things, like spray-painting a misdrawn swastika on a kosher restaurant several continents away, calling in hundreds of fake bomb threats, or killing some odious fat woman who will probably just die on her own from a heart attack.

This is ironic, given Israel’s own proclivity for slaughtering children, blowing people’s eyes out with rigged electronic devices, shoving things into peoples asses, burying living people in pits with air tubes and then cutting off the air, and an endless list of other acts of cartoonish villainy.

Of course, no discussion of this issue could be complete without examining the role of Claudia Sheinbaum, the Jew who was elected president of Mexico because she was the most beautiful woman in Mexico.

Claudia Sheinbaum is so beautiful that men are completely overcome with lust, flinging themselves upon her like wild beasts wherever she goes.

Sheinbaum is Jewish, but she didn’t have the nerve to try to pull an Australia and simply agree with whatever it is Israel says is happening.

The Cradle:

Mexican authorities rejected on 8 November US and Israeli claims of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Israeli ambassador to the Latin American nation. Mexico’s foreign relations and security ministries issued a brief joint statement saying that “they have no report with respect to a supposed attempt against the ambassador of Israel in Mexico.”

The statement said the foreign ministry “reiterates its willingness to maintain fluid communication with all accredited diplomatic representations in our country.” The security ministry “reaffirms its respectful and coordinated collaboration, always within the framework of national sovereignty, with all security agencies that request it.”

Israel is undeterred, of course, and will continue to sow lies and deceit as it prepares for its next round of war against Iran.

I don’t think young people are aware of this, but in American history, there used to be generational cultural differences. Young people had music, slang, and esoteric cultural memes that were unique, that older people were not aware of.

This is no longer the case. Because of the internet, and the fact that everyone is on the same platforms, younger generations, including gen Z (these people are like 30 now, by the way) and the generation younger than them, which I believe is called “gen Q,” have cultural and social cues that are just watered down versions of millennialisms.

Everything I see from younger people on the internet is just progressively sanitized versions of stuff I saw on /b/ in 2004. It’s sickening.

Sometimes there is new slang, but it’s not clear where it originates from, and everyone of all age groups starts using it at the same time. Paul Skallas, who I believe is the core philosopher of the 21st century, has said that we are trapped in 2004.

Robot says:

Paul Skallas is a writer and commentator known for his theory that culture became “stuck” around 2004, a concept he popularized through social media.He posits that this period marked a significant shift where the monoculture fractured, leading to a lack of overarching cultural narratives and preventing substantive changes in pop culture. According to Skallas, this stagnation is evident in the entertainment industry, where content often feels recycled, with sequels, remakes, and nostalgic themes dominating the landscape.He has suggested that the mid-2000s, particularly around 2004 or 2006, was a pivotal moment when the cultural landscape shifted toward a state of repetition and diminished innovation. While he acknowledges the decentralization of media and the rise of the internet as potential contributing factors, he admits the exact cause remains unclear.

The cause is sort of unclear, but it is also obvious that it is the internet. We are all in the same space now.

As a millennial, I was a member of the last generation to grow up with a culture that was not internet based. At least as a younger teenager. By the time I was 20, it was all the internet. But before that, there was a difference in culture among young people. I remember my father trying to use youth slang, which is normal enough, and using it in the wrong way. That is now impossible. Everyone on the internet is in the same monoculture.

There is some element of this that isn’t bad. Historically, like as in, a long time ago, people lived the same lives as their grandparents. And their great great great grandparents. This was before the Industrial Revolution. After the Industrial Revolution, you had major technological advancements that caused cultural changes every generation, which left grandparents feeling very alienated by all the alien shit their grandkids were into. It is obviously better to have a consistency of culture.

Well, it’s good to have a consistency of culture if it is medieval culture. If it is 2004 bland and nihilistic horseshit hedonism, it is really not that great to have it as a stagnant culture.

It is assumed that young people added things like “take the L” or “posting the W” to the slang. But when I see that, I think “what is this boomer tripe? What a stupid phrase.” Further, there is no evidence that young people made these phrases. They used it on TikTok and whatever, but no one knows who comes up with these things, and people of all ages, including boomers, will pick up on these language additions and use them.

If there is a change, it is that young people are less edgy and less hip. They are worse than even millennials (who I think are worse than boomers), because there is no room for creativity on the internet, and so all young people do is recycle millennial material and make it gayer and more retarded.

I have no idea what the implications of this are, and unlike I usually do, I am not going to draw some kind of insight or meaningful conclusion about the nature of this phenomenon. I think it probably means nothing good or bad can happen, nothing new at all can happen, youth energy doesn’t really exist in the way it previously did. I don’t think going to punk rock shows and taking acid and jumping around and having sex in the bathroom was a good thing. And maybe it wasn’t that much different than what boomers were doing, just with worse music. But there was a break with the previous generation, which meant that there was at least potential room for something new that was good to emerge. I think it is now impossible for anything new and good to emerge from the youth.

The youth are now against Israel, of course, but so is everyone who isn’t old.

These Gallup numbers don’t separate the age groups meaningfully.

The 35-54 age group is much too wide. Of the 23% of that group that have a positive view of Bibi, I would think the overwhelming majority of the supporters would be between 45 and 54, whereas 35-44 would have the same opinion as 18-34.

There would be some differences in generations, because the younger the generation, the less white it is. So it will be different on some things, when measured by age alone. I don’t know or care what is going on with immigrants or black people. I assume they are against Israel, when it comes to this particular topic, and that’s fine, but in general, their opinions do not matter to me.

One thing I don’t know is how the browning of America will affect culture. I assume it will not be good. But also, I think younger whites, particularly men, are feeling under attack, which will lead to you know, whatever.

I understand this article is not good or important. But I think the basic observations are important, and possibly something that people are not really noticing. But we are stagnant. There is nothing new coming from the youth. Everything is just being recycled and made shittier in the process.

It is boring and disgusting.

To be clear, I do not think the decay is a result of technology, but simply enabled by it. The fact that everyone is on the same level and in the same space together could mean that young people would be bringing older people forward in a positive direction, but instead the opposite is happening, with terms like “take the L” being used by men in their forties, despite the fact that they suck, while teenagers listen to early 00s indie rock, despite the fact that it sucks. Everything just spirals towards the lowest common denominator, with all of the worst traits of millennials being promoted, and millennials adopting the worst traits of the younger generations. Millennials did not have “woke” as youths. We could say “faggot” and “nigger” without people throwing a fit. But then, in their thirties, millennials became the hardest core fighters for wokeism, apparently feeling it was the hip young trend?

Now, teenagers listen to Joe Rogan and get convinced that Peter Thiel, the guy running the AI targeting system for the Israelis, giving lectures on the Antichrist, is somehow not concerning and may in fact be totally normal. Meanwhile, every male of every age is chronically masturbating and no one has connected this to the testosterone plunge, and the last thing on anyone’s mind is ███████ and ███████ ████.

As we get ready for the next round of the Iran war, Western governments need to come up with an explanation as to why we are going to war for Israel beyond “shielding Jews from blowback as a result of their genocide in Gaza.”

Enter: “Iranian backed terror.”

You have probably heard the claim in various Jewish media that Iran is a “state-backer of terrorism.” However, this claim, when dissected, does not refer to ISIS or al-Qeada style terrorism, but rather is a reference to Iran’s funding of various militias around the Middle East. For example, the media categorizes Iran’s support for Hezbollah and the Houthis as “backing terrorism.” Whatever you think of the militias Iran does back, this is something different than blowing up buildings or running people over with a big truck in Europe or America.

There have been some shaky claims of Iran sponsoring bombings in Saudi and Argentina in the 1990s, and in 2012, India said Iranians tried to kill an Israeli diplomat with a bomb. The same guy was accused of doing a bombing in Thailand, however, and after being extradited to Thailand from Malaysia, the Thai authorities refused to charge him and released him to Iran.

All of this is to say that this week’s accusations by the Australian Prime Minister that the Iranian government was behind the bombing of a synagogue and a Jewish deli in Australia are something different than we’ve seen before. The Melbourne synagogue was bombed on December 6th of last year. The Sydney deli, which burned up last October, was not even originally investigated as foul play by the cops. No one died in either “attack.”

As those who study the Jews are all too aware, Jewish very often commit hate crimes against themselves. Even before terrorism was a thing, Jews would regularly burn down their own properties to collect insurance money. The term “Jewish lightning” is in the lexicon to refer to anyone burning down their own property for the insurance, as Jews were so famous for this behavior (similarly to how a non-Jewish person viewed as greedy might be called “Shylock”).

It’s maybe worth noting that sense the bombing, the rabbi from the synagogue in question has been on a donations tour, and with the announcement it was Iran, is on another tour asking for even more free money.

What’s more, if these were indeed intentional attacks from someone, their timing, in the middle of the Gaza genocide, could mean that literally anyone could be responsible. Although Moslems would probably be more likely, it is not hard to imagine a non-Moslem outraged at the scenes on TikTok doing something like this. On its face, blaming the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps for the bombing of a random deli and synagogue in Australia sounds ridiculous, and it seems they would be some of the last people on the list of suspects.

Even if you believe Iran was responsible for the attacks they were accused of in the 1990s and then the 2012 events, those were all political or military targets. The idea of a serious military organization ordering random restaurants and synagogues in a random country blown up is silly. Iran is capable of sending rockets at Israel, they are capable of cutting off Israel’s access to shipping lanes. It makes no sense they would sink to street level random acts of random violence, which would not need any central planning.

Further, the fact that the firebombing would not need to be centrally planned means that it would be impossible to trace it to Iranian authorities. What would even be the claim? That they found text messages from a general in the IRGC? And that it took them nearly a year to find these text messages?

The identities of the accused have not been revealed, but the claim by the government is that they are street criminals who also committed other crimes who the IRGC hired through their networks to carry out these very serious firebombings that had no political purpose and where no one even died.

Here’s the Thing

This announcement by the weasel Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that Iran ordered the bombing of these random civilian locations in a white, Western country has been a top news story all over the world. Although no one is likely to look too deeply into it, because again, literally no one died, this gets the idea that “Iran is funding terrorist attacks on civilians” into the minds of the masses of the people.

With the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001, the FBI had previously coordinated an attempted bombing of the same buildings in 1993 as a kind of precursor. Then you had the second attack, with the airplanes, lead to an invasion of Afghanistan. Then, in the weeks and months after 9/11, someone was sending Anthrax all around to media and government people, which is when the media/government started talking about Iraq as working with the al-Qeada. In 2008, they then said it was actually some random white guy that did the anthrax. He was, conveniently, already dead.

This is the note that was with the Anthrax sent to Tom Brokaw:

The FBI never really bothered to try to explain why a white guy would do that.

But refencing the Anthrax mailed around, Colin (pronuonced “Colon” for some reason) Powell brought white powder as a prop to his UN presentation on the need to. invade Iraq,

There was an ongoing triangle of disinformation and fake news passing from the New York Times, Dick Cheney, and Fox News. They were accusing Saddam of all kinds of things, just like they are with Iran right now, but the core of it was Cheney’s “Sinister Nexus of Terror.”

You still had the steam from 9/11 when they did the Iraq war less than two years later. But with Iran now, are we really supposed to do a massive war because of October 7th? Or is there going to need to be something more significant to motivate people?

I would very much expect that this Australian cafe and synagogue is the beginning of something bigger. With 9/11 and the Anthrax, when people were saying “oh they can’t be false flags, the government wouldn’t do that,” it was like “well, they started fake wars and killed like a million people, so why wouldn’t they blow up some buildings or send some powders?”

Looking back now, it feels like the “12 Day War” (the term they are using for the back and forth between Israel and Iran that involved Trump also dropping bombs on Iran) was a kind of probing event, where they wanted to see what Iran had. I think they were possibly a bit surprised at how capable Iran was. They were not the superpower capable of wiping Israel off the map that Scott Ritter had told everyone they were, but they were able to hit Israel and with missiles and cause real damage, and it was going to be impossible for Israel to keep going much longer before they were running out of their interceptor missiles.

Israel’s view on Iran has not changed, they are saying they are going to attack them again, and there is no way they can do it without the US, and involving the US on a large scale will probably take more than some all caps Trump tweets.

Obviously, at this point, huge numbers of people are going to be saying “false flag,” even if it is something on the scale of 9/11. So I don’t claim to know how this would work. If I was Donald Trump, I’d be worried the Mossad was going to assassinate me and blame Iran. That would get all the Trump supporters behind a war and it would leave leftists confused as to how they should feel, because if they said “false flag,” they might feel like they were defending Trump. Also, there has already been a “foreshadowing” event where Trump was allegedly scraped on the ear. And, I would add, that a personality like Trump getting shot would just generally be a bigger shock to the world than a bombing, which we’ve all already seen a lot of.

Or maybe I’m wrong and there is already enough noise and there doesn’t need to be some big event to justify further action in Iran. I guess the issue is that I don’t know really what it would take. If there needed to be an Iraq style invasion, then you would need some pretty big justification. But no one understands the logistics of this war. Like I said, I think the first thing was a test as much as anything.

But there are a lot of questions.

If there was large scale bombing of Tehran, could they do a “regime change” from the air? If so, could they keep shooting rockets without a “regime”? How stable is the domestic situation in the country? How do the Arabs, Azeris, and other minorities feel? (I think we know how the Kurds feel, lol. But the others, who knows? I don’t know. I do know that Persians are barely half the population.) Are there terrorists that can be moved in through Azerbaijan? What happened all those terrorists in Syria now that their guy is in charge? Can they be moved through Iraq and into Iran? It’s much more mountainous in Iran.

This is a lot different than when ISIS was able to just roll around wherever on the flats in the Iraqi/Syrian desert.

The mountains also provide a lot of cover for hydra-type break-off groups to operate if the government falls or is at least incapable of operating normally. I’m sure they have caves loaded up with drones and cheap missiles, and as we saw in the 12 Day War, the cost of shooting them down is too much for Israel to absorb. Even if they have infinity money from Big Daddy Donald, they can’t make that many interceptor missiles.

Those are some of the big questions. There are more questions. I’m sure the people with in intelligence have better estimates than I would be able to come up with as to what the answers to these questions might be, but I think even US/Israeli intelligence can’t give definite answers regarding most of these factors.

What I do think is that slowly drilling away at it until the armor cracks like they did with Syria is not a potential strategy given that unlike Syria, Iran can hit Israel with missiles. So I’m sure what Bibi wants is the full force of the US military to be brought to bear in a full invasion type war. And for that to happen, it is most likely that something very extreme would have to precipitate it.

The filthy hook-nosed Zionists are most famous for killing Jesus, mutilating penises, and most recently, committing a genocide against Palestinians. Along with the classic hook-nose and beady rat-eyes, the average Zionist may also have bloated lips which look like two infectious worms crawling alongside one another.

A typical Zionist looks like this:

Along with committing genocides, they worship satan, rape kids, ruin Star Wars, and often do cannibalism.

When a Zionist takes a break from setting up death traps for Palestinian children, it will often attempt to genocide other innocent creatures, such as Moomins. This is the case in New York, where the Zionist ruler of the Brooklyn Library, Fritzi Bodenheimer, has begun eradicating the Moomin people under the false claim that she is protecting the BIPOCs.

The Moomin “Stinky” was designed by the famous Aryan Queerfolk creator known as Tove Jansson, and Zionists have decided he has no more right to live than a Palestinian in Gaza.

Helskinki Times:

The Brooklyn Public Library in New York has removed an image of the Moomin character Stinky, known in Finnish as Haisuli, from a Tove Jansson exhibition after a donor found the character potentially racist.

The exhibition, titled Tove Jansson and the Moomins: The Door Is Always Open, is the first major showcase of Jansson’s work in the United States. It presents her legacy as a writer, illustrator, pacifist and queer artist, alongside illustrations, archival materials and immersive events. It will remain open until 30 September.

Roleff Kråkström, CEO of Moomin Characters, which oversees the use and licensing of the Moomin brand, confirmed that Stinky was removed at the library’s request.

“The library informed us that one of their patrons had interpreted Stinky as a potentially racist symbol. Based on their feedback, we agreed to update the visual content,” Kråkström said in an interview with Hufvudstadsbladet.

The decision has sparked confusion among Finnish Moomin representatives. Kråkström said the accusation is unprecedented. “To our knowledge, this is the first time in the 80-year history of the Moomins that anyone has viewed Stinky as racist,” he told Helsingin Sanomat by email.

A spokesperson for the Brooklyn Public Library, Fritzi Bodenheimer, confirmed the image was taken down in response to the complaint. “This was a curatorial decision intended to ensure all visitors feel welcome,” she told Hufvudstadsbladet.

Zionists are great at making people “feel welcome.” Just look at this “welcoming” they did last week for the starving people of Gaza:

Bombs struck just 30m from the Academy of Hope I support. Our red door location shelters 600 children. No child, woman, civilian, or humanitarian should be harmed. We demand a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and safe, uninterrupted aid for Gaza. Humanity must prevail….. pic.twitter.com/JHPQhXOMXW

— Chef José Andrés 🕊️🥘🍳 (@chefjoseandres) August 21, 2025

They will welcome you to your doom.

Stinky is one of the recurring characters in the Moomin universe. He is depicted as a small, troublesome figure who enjoys playing pranks and causing minor chaos. Despite his behaviour, the residents of Moominvalley tolerate him with patience.

The character appears in several books, comics and merchandise, including mugs and figurines. Stinky is often portrayed with exaggerated features and a mischievous grin, but he has never been associated with race or ethnicity.

Not until the Jews showed up.

Jews hate queerfolk and the BIPOC, so they will attack the queerfolk and our aryan cartoons and say they are protecting the feelings of BIPOCs, then they will switch it up.

Here you can see a Zionist smooshing a BIPOC, ostensibly to protect a Moomin:

What a disgrace.

Selma Green, director of the Moomin Museum in Tampere, said she was surprised by the decision. “The core idea in Tove Jansson’s art and Moomin illustrations is tolerance and diversity,” she said.

According to Green, the interpretation made in Brooklyn contradicts the foundational values of the Moomin stories. “There are semi-scary characters in the Moomin books and comics. Stinky is a bit wicked but also amusing,” she added.

Well, that does appear to describe the BIPOC race.

For example, the famous BIPOC philosopher “George Floyd” was described by friends and family as “semi-scary, stinky, a bit wicked, but also amusing.”

The Aryan children of the wheat-fields could and should learn about the threats of BIPOC philosophers like Floyd from these important cartoons.

Floyd is pictured here making off with some objects he stole from a pregnant woman:

Massive lies were told about the events of October 7, 2023, and what Hamas allegedly did to the Jews, and this has led me to wonder how it is possible that people can continue to believe the lies that were told about what the Germans did to the Jews during World War II.

Let’s go through some of the big lies Jews, in the Israeli and US governments and the US media told, about October 7th “atrocities.”

1) “40 Beheaded Babies”

Claim

On the day of the event, reports that appear to have originated from i24 News as well as direct statements from Bibi Netanyahu’s office, claimed that Hamas “terrorists” beheaded 40 babies. (Note: Hamas does not actually fit the definition of terrorists, as there is such a thing as a legitimate resistance group that uses violence, and simply being Islamic doesn’t mean your group is “terrorist.”)

The claim was repeated not just by tabloids, but the likes of Fox News and CNN.

Debunking

In this case, the Israeli government itself later admitted that there was no evidence of 40 beheaded babies. The White House also walked back Joe Biden’s use of the claim.

There was no evidence, despite the fact that the site of the Hamas attack was filmed as much as any place ever, so there was no need for an official debunking. After reporters kept asking about evidence, the US and Israeli governments just admitted it was fake.

2) Mass Rape and Sexual Violence

Claim

The entire Israeli government organized to claim that during the October 7th raid, Hamas engaged in “systematic rape” and “sexual mutilation.”

This rape claim always seemed ridiculous on its face, as though the total time Hamas was across the border might have been as many as 6-7 hours, the actual operation was between 3-5 hours long. These people were in gun fights with the IDF, they were dodging airstrikes, they were taking hostages, all while navigating unfamiliar terrain (and often getting lost, as is seen in Hamas’ own videos and was admitted during interrogations). “Okay boys, let’s take a quick break for rape” always sounded very silly.

Furthermore, as the Jews and their media constantly repeat, Hamas is a strict Islamic group, and based on that, any soldier caught engaging in rape during a military operation would be executed on the spot. If they were doing “systematic rape,” they are not an Islamic group at all, but an irreligious bandit gang, and that is not a claim anyone is making. The media obviously relied on the lack of information the public has about Islamic law, knowing they would not be aware that rape during war is totally banned.

The Koran bans all rape, including of slave girls. Here are specific Hadith that mention sexual violence during war:

• Hadith (Sunan Abu Dawud 2158): “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited taking women as captives solely for the purpose of sexual relations.”
• Hadith (Sahih Muslim 3371): “Do not kill women, children, or the elderly, and do not commit treachery or rape.”

There is no serious Islamic group that allows rape during war. Even ISIS banned this. You’ll remember that all of the talk about sexual abuse by ISIS was around forced marriage (which is allowed in certain contexts in certain forms of Islam). And Hamas is a much more serious Islamic group than ISIS, which is a CIA and Israel-backed terror group.

Debunking

An official UN investigation (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), which was (quite ridiculously) not released until March 2024, even though it could have been completed and released in a matter of a couple weeks, found no evidence of “widespread rape.”

Further, forensic experts from various international rights groups found nothing, while independent investigators from The Grayzone and Mondoweiss (both primarily Jewish outlets) found no evidence supporting the rape claims.

Finally, specific claims were later proven false. The Israeli government had claimed there existed a “Hamas rape manual” which was proved to be totally made-up out of nothing.

3) Hamas Burned Families Alive, Purposefully Murdered Civilians

Claim

The entire media was claiming that Hamas “burned families alive” by setting their houses on fire. There was no evidence ever presented.

Debunking

An investigation by Israel publications +972 Magazine and Local Call found that most (not all, but most) civilian deaths in homes were due to Israeli helicopter fire.

Israeli helicopters (actually US helicopters supplied to Israel) also gunned down hostages on Hamas motorcycles, the investigation found.

The IDF later admitted to using the “Hannibal Directive,” which involves using heavy fire to prevent hostages from being taken, and allows for the death of Israelis. The preference, in the doctrine, is that a civilian die rather than be taken hostage.

4) Hamas “Targeted” a Music Festival

Claim

It was claimed that the Nova music festival was a specific target of Hamas and that they started mass executing people there.

Debunking

It was later shown that the music festival was coincidentally going on when Hamas attacked. Investigations by Jewish outlets (Yedioth Ahronoth, Haaretz) showed that many of the festival goers who died were not killed by Hamas (at least not on purpose in “executions”), but rather in crossfire in the fighting with the IDF, as well as by Israeli helicopter strikes.

5) Hamas Used Human Shields White Fighting from Civilian Homes

Claim

The Jewish state claimed Hamas fighters were hiding in the Kibbutzim and shooting from behind families, from inside of family homes.

Debunking

Testimonies from survivors published by The Electronic Intifada and Middle East Eye among others showed that the Hamas fighters were directly engaging in shootouts with the IDF, not hiding in civilian homes.

6) The Attack was Part of a Planned a Genocide

Claim

Almost unbelievably, the Jews claimed that this small operation on October 7th was a plan to genocide all of the Jews, and that the goal of the attack was random killing.

Debunking

Leaked Israeli intelligence from +972 showed that the Israelis understood that Hamas expected a prisoner swap and had no goal of mass killing civilians.

Before October 7th, Israel was holding over 5,000 Palestinian hostages (since October 7th, that number has more than doubled), so it is pretty rational that Hamas would want to take their own hostages as a way to get back their own people through swaps, and this is in fact what Israeli intelligence said the purpose of the operation was.

When Did Jews Start Lying Like This Then?

Jews lie compulsively in order to make themselves out to be victims. Certainly, there were Jewish innocent victims on October 7th, as there are always victims in war, but the fact is, most of the innocents were killed by the Jews themselves, and the Hamas operation was a legitimate military operation.

It is shocking to me personally that the same people who will say the Jews lied about really everything they could possibly lie about with relation to October 7th, are not willing to question the stories Jews tell about what supposedly happened to them during World War II.

My hope is that there is simply a delay on this, and at some point in the future, people will ask: “well, what else have the Jews been lying about?”

There has been, since the October 7 event and the subsequent genocide Israel began committing in Gaza, some interest in understanding the foundation of Israel. For example, the story of the Palestinian model Gigi Hadid’s family has come up a lot. Her father was a child at the time of the establishment of the state of Israel, when, following the war, Jews went to Palestine to claim refugee status. His family invited a family of Jew refugees from Europe into their home, and one day they returned home to find that the locks had been changed and the Jews who they had welcomed into their home yelled out the window that if they didn’t leave the premises, men would come and kill them. So they moved to a refugee camp in Syria.

Here’s a short video of Mohamed Hadid telling this story:

What happened to Hadid’s family happened to millions of Palestinians. It’s called the “Nakba,” and it is the story of the foundation of Israel, and I it is great that more and more people are finding out that Israelis didn’t all of the sudden become genocidal barbarians after October 7th, but that in fact, the entire existence of their state is based on genocide and evil.

If we get back to the point where we are talking about the foundations of Israel, then it is just one step back to what happened to the Jews in Europe during World War II. We can learn why the Germans wanted to put them in camps, and what happened in those camps. I am not going to go through the whole “Holohoax” story here today, but a lot of Jews did die during the war, because it is a war that killed 70 million people. Jews died in the camps too, because the allies bombed the supply lines to the camps which were in rural Poland, which led to disease and starvation. The Red Cross at the time estimated that 280,000 people died in these camps. Not six million. And none of them died in gas chambers or by any of the other Loony Toons type methods Jews claim the Germans used against them.

Conclusion

It is my sincere hope that as the Jews come under more scrutiny for these lies they’ve told, as we unravel the history of the state of Israel, a state founded on ethnically cleansing, terrorism, bandrity, and mass murder, we will continue to go back through the history of the Jews, and specifically to unravel this “Holocaust” myth, which currently serves as the foundation for the entirety of Western secular ideology, which has itself become the framework of what now passes as “Western civilization” itself.

Since I began writing on these issues nearly 15 years ago, I have argued that in order for the liberal order to fall, and for a righteous, Christian society to be restored in the West, the truth about the Jews and their lies must be confronted. The “Holocaust” is the biggest and most powerful lie of all, and if this falls apart, and I truly believe we are witnessing the beginnings of its collapse, everything will change.

Ultimately, the truth will out. In a thousand years, people are not going to be believing in “Nazi gas chambers,” I can promise you that. The real question is how many people have to die, how much human suffering has to take place, before this lie is exposed.

Donald Trump has turned against Thomas Massie for some reason. Very cleverly, however, he is tweeting opposite messages about him and making sure different parts of the voter base sees the tweets.

He is using Palantir AI to make sure different parts of his base see different tweets.

First, he tweeted – or “truthed” – out this one:

Then, realizing that many in the base would not like that tweet, he posted a second tweet which he will use AI to show to other people who are against the Jews:

Obviously, I agree with the second tweet, but I think it is very cynical to US AI to make sure different groups see different tweets with opposite messages.

I thought we were for transparency in MAGA??

Massie appeared on Theo Von this week (Theo is the realest). You can see his own views.

Personally, I would rather primary Trump than Massie, and I think when Trump fails to primary Massie, and when there is huge support against Trump and for Massie, it will be a big wakeup call as to just how much the base hates Trump’s insane allegiance to the Jews.

I think we’re going to see it long before that, in fact.

The midterms are going to be a complete disaster and probably everyone is just going to vote for Hamas agents like Zohran. I would vote today for any Hamas candidate over Donald Trump.

By the way, just so you understand: that second Trump tweet is a joke I made up for humor purposes. The first tweet is real. Trump is really saying Massie is not America First because he’s not Israel First and according to Trump, it’s the same thing and anyone who questions that is against him.

We’ll see how that goes for him.

I suspect it won’t go great.

‘Tonight I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated’

President Trump addresses the nation following US strikes on Iran.

Latest: https://t.co/je3LeESEFs pic.twitter.com/BFjyiJhk5X

— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 22, 2025

He should have brought the “Mission Accomplished” sign

This is more of an analysis site than a news site these days. Sometimes it’s a self analysis site. I’m thinking about focusing full-time on psychoanalyzing Jordan Peterson and his whore daughter.

But hard not to post the news that Trump bombed Iran.

I just wrote a long article about like, Ireland or the Jews or something, or whatever. I don’t have much analysis here.

Emmmm….

Seymour Hersch is trending on Twitter. And yeah, serious business to call it. But he said they were planning on bombing more than the nuke sites. He said “all-out bombing campaign.”

Maybe Trump is lying and they bombed more than the three nuke sites? No one seems to know anything right now. I guess we’ll have to wait for an update from Sy.

Meanwhile, Scott Ritter is reporting that his sources say Iran’s nuclear sites were a ruse and they were actually building a Metal Gear at a secret site in a secret location and that they will launch it on Wednesday at 1:34 PM local time and it will level Tel Aviv. “Excuse my language but Netanyahu and Smotrich and that gang are shitting in their boots because they know they don’t have a weapon to rival Metal Gear,” Ritter reported. “You know when the button on the toaster gets stuck and you don’t notice it until you start to smell the burning and see the smoke and then you pop the pop tart out and it’s pure black with bubbles? Well, excuse my language, but that is what all of Israel is going to look like, daddy-o.”

The True Conservative MAGA originalists are making some fire memes.

That shit is literally Musk-tier.

I don’t really… let me think…

That’s the best I’ve got for that format. Aya-COAL-ah, we can call it.

It’s leftist style too long. Really only needs four panels.

And uh….

I can’t into it. Boring.

But if I was in MAGA world trying to somehow prop it up right now, that’s the sort of shit I would be posting. But you’re not seeing anything like that because no one who isn’t the kind of Elon-tier retard who makes that original meme is trying to prop it up.

Anyway, the argument that it’s a quickie is… who knows. I don’t know. I guess I hope that’s true? Or I would hope that if I cared. I sort of just kinda don’t really even care very much, to be honest with you? Anyone else sort of feeling that?

I guess I do care it’s just that I can’t really feel outraged, since I’ve been telegraphing this since like, October 10, 2023.

The logic:

• October 7th couldn’t happen unless Israel allowed it
• Israel knew they couldn’t beat Hamas
• Gaza was designed to create a pretext to take out all of Israel’s more important enemies
• Trump would be better at getting Americans to go all in for Israel
• Trump took all that money from Miriam Adelson
• Trump was praised as a messiah after the ear scratching heard round the world
• Trump was always going to attack Iran after being “elected” in a fake US election

It’s boring and I’m bored.

I guess if Iran backs down now then Israel stop bombing and it’s supposed to be over just like that? That’s clearly what is being sold here. I don’t know if that is possible or not. I think it’s possible Iran would just stand down and take it, but if they do that they’re going to then actually build a bomb or just like, buy one from North Korea (couldn’t they have always done that? why don’t people ever mention that?). And I think it’s impossible Israel will settle for something less than regime change. And it is impossible that there will be a youth/slut revolution in Iran after the Israeli bombing.

Then regime change is complicated because… well, a lot of reasons, but if you kill the Ayatollah they just appoint a new Ayatollah. There is no path to really anything. Fox News is pushing the son of the Shah being made king. They’re literally calling him “His Royal Highness.”

So I guess he’s um, already the king?

I guess you can send the US military to invade and occupy Tehran for decades and say this guy is the king and then just hope the people eventually accept it? Is that the plan?

I don’t understand what the plan is here like at all.

Trump “standing up to Bibi” and saying he was only in for the nuke sites and not the regime change would just mean Israel false flags a US installation in Iraq. But it also doesn’t make sense from Trump’s position that blowing up these sites stopped the development of a bomb. It actually does the opposite?

Anyway, whatever.

Who cares.

I don’t care anymore.

I was watching Theo Von interview with “Indian-American” Ro Khanna. He said some silly leftist nonsense, like that he’s going to teach blacks in the south to program AI. He promoted the “Chinese social credit score” hoax, which is exhaustingly stupid (and when it comes from an Indian, it seems racially motivated). But he said a lot of populist stuff, a lot of pro-internet stuff, and I was thinking, as I imagine most people would think: “this guy is alright.”

As part of my investigation of “alternative media,” I’ve also been watching Breaking Points, which features “Indian-American” Saagar Enjeti. No one is going to say that guy isn’t alright. You could put various caveats on that, I’m sure he says some dumb shit like most of these people do, but he’s totally alright.

So, as I do (most people don’t but I do), I’m thinking about them and I circled back to my long-held belief system that “all these people need to go back,” and asked if that was a nasty thing. Frankly, even if I thought it was nasty, I would continue to support everyone going back, but I wanted to ask myself: is it nasty to want to send back guys who were born here, who seem like alright dudes, on the basis of the fact that they have the incorrect genetics for this country? Or is it bad in some other way?

I’m not emotionally bothered by the ICE videos of children getting grabbed in parking lots, by the way. Just for the record. I think it’s really stupid to be grabbing kids when you don’t have the resources to grab all the adults, or even all of the criminals, because the optics are bad. But my view is that they all need to go back and I’ve seen the Democrats justify a genocide of children in Gaza so they’re not going to emotionally manipulate me with a kid getting thrown in a van because he’s “separated from his mother” for however long it takes to process them before they can go together back to Mexico. If I was running this, I would definitely deport the most sympathetic people (women and kids and non-criminals in general) last. Given that everyone is not being deported, and in fact only a tiny fraction of people are being deported, I think it’s insane to do these optics of screaming kids being thrown in vans, but it doesn’t bother me emotionally because I’m an adult and being separated from your mother for a few hours or a few days before you can meet back up in Mexico is not a big deal. Again, please compare to bipartisan support for dropping 2,000 pound bombs on refugee camps filled with kids in Gaza. It’s not serious to make this “kids being briefly separated from their parents” thing into a big emotional fit, and it is frankly being done by the same people telling you to ignore the genocide in Gaza (note: specifically, I mean “the Jews”).

Much more than kids (who don’t even know the difference) being sent back, I would be concerned about one of the only Congressmen that is against the Gaza genocide and defends the internet or a guy who does okay podcasts being sent back.

So I ask myself: is this nasty or bad in some other way?

Again, even if it is nasty or bad, my strongly held belief is that America should be an overwhelmingly white country. But in order to understand your own beliefs, you have to be able to interrogate them yourself and allow others to interrogate them. That should be obvious. The core of my problem with the left and the “Ben Shapiro right” is that they won’t allow their beliefs to be interrogated. They just censor people or completely destroy their lives. I think my beliefs should be open to interrogation, and “is it nasty to deport some brown people who seem like cool dudes who aren’t doing anything wrong?” is a totally valid interrogation of my belief system.

But here’s the thing: it really isn’t nasty. All of the cool dudes, who you might think could provide something to America, would do very well in their own countries. Relatively, they will do better than they do here. Intelligent brown people will be more than fine back in their own countries. They’ll get money and pussy and whatever. They will be totally fine.

It’s actually a better argument that we should bring poor people here from all over the world to live on welfare because it’s sad that they’re poor. And that is a completely nonsensical argument. You can’t really even respond to it, it’s so dumb.

And come on. We’ve all seen the marbles video.

Sorry, it was gumballs. Not marbles.

Don’t let the kids eat gumballs, guys. Red 40, titanium dioxide, literal polyethylene. Come on, guys.

Anyway, yeah, solving global poverty through mass immigration is not something I think you could find any man arguing for. It’s a purely emotional argument for women. And yet, I think it actually is better than the argument that it’s wrong to deport middle class people who were born here.

Yes, I get that the ones born here are “legal,” but please go check on how much “the law” has an effect on American society. It’s irrelevant. This is not a society based on an ordered system of laws. We’re not living in China or some Islamic Sharia country. “The law” is just whatever. There is no reason you can’t just say that every person who came here after the (Jewish!) 1965 Hart-Cellar Act is no longer a citizen. You can just say “it’s the law now that you’re not a citizen anymore and now you have to go back to India, lol.” You could also just say there’s a law that you have to be white or you’re not a citizen anymore. Laws can say whatever. There isn’t an ordered system here. We do not have a theocracy or some other objective metric to measure the validity of laws. We have “The Constitution,” which doesn’t even mean anything. This is a country where the government can 100% do whatever. So there is no point to babble about legalisms. Literally no one cares about the Constitution unless they can use it for their own agenda. It’s like that atheism meme.

Except all sides do it to each other.

I’m not even insulting the Constitution in theory. I mean, I probably would insult it in theory. I believe in Jesus and don’t really care about goofy secular government gobbledygook. But I’m not insulting it in theory right now. Right now, I’m simply going to say that “the right to free association” is so fundamental to the Constitution, so deeply hardwired into the very most basic it, that literally no one can claim the Constitution is in effect after “civil rights” were enacted as “law” in the US.

The only thing that you could say is nasty about any mass deportation program is if it is sadistic or cruel in some way. Unlike Trump’s “just grab whoever out of the parking lot lol” program (which in the absolute best case scenario, won’t even get rid of 2% of illegals, and Trump has endorsed more legals, who are actually much worse), a serious mass deportation program aimed at reestablishing a white America, which would necessarily target both “illegal” and “legal” immigrants (primarily the latter, as there are many more of them and they are a much larger and existential threat) would give people timelines, deadlines, a process to apply extend deadlines, and so on. You’d allow people to sell their property, and if they couldn’t sell it, pay them market value. You’d give them severance checks. You’d use American soft power to ensure their arrival in their home countries was nice. You’d be reasonable and friendly about the whole thing. You’d just make it clear: this isn’t about emotions, it’s not about hate or pity or anything else, this is a matter that we’ve decided on based on the desire to maintain a cohesive society where we preserve our genetic heritage, our racial identity, for future generations.

Or you could just use Palantir’s government-controlled AI to take control of every electronic device in the country and blast Metallica’s “And Justice for All” while you unleash the police and military to just hunt down and kill anyone who isn’t white.

By the way, Metallica is on tour. Hetfield looks fantastic.

Along with thinking constantly about death and how you are a complete failure and everything you’ve ever done was trite and cheap and how you’re a complete asshole who should have treated people better and how death is just right there, looking at you, the other thing you do when you hit middle age is start looking at guys in their fifties and sixties and asking yourself if you’re going to be a Marlon Brando or a James Hetfield.

With Metallica doing so well in their sunset years, you could actually just pass a law that says they have to keep playing the entire “And Justice for All” album over and over again until every brown person in America is dead.

When Metallica is like “but it could take days for the military to kill all these niggers,” you would just have to be like “yeah, bro, I get it, but it’s the law, because of the Constitution. You just have to keep playing until they’re all dead. Then you actually have to keep playing for seventeen more hours as part of the celebration ceremony.”

So anyway, I was thinking: if ICE showed up at my door and was like “you and your family have to go back to Ireland,” what would I do?

I decided that I would:

• Squint
• Look down at the ground
• Scratch my eyebrow
• And then be like
• “Alright”

Ireland is definitely poorer than America. It’s getting way shittier with the number of niggers from wherever flooding in. But in this scenario I’m forwarding, Ireland would also be deporting people (otherwise I would probably be disappointed about having to go back as in America there is more space and thus for the time being at least, more chance to avoid colorful peoples). It’s also a scenario in which I’m allowed to live in America, which isn’t the current situation.

Frankly, I’ve been out of America so long, and it’s now become so clear that I won’t ever be allowed back, that it is becoming more and more difficult to care. I don’t think the people who are there care very much. If they did, they would be… you know. They’d be doing something or other. I look at the unwillingness to actually address the Jewish problem, and see that the reason is that people don’t want to seem mean for not caring about a pile of shoes, and I’m like: why did I ever destroy my life to try to help save this country? I know why and I would do it again: I thought people would stand up with me. They didn’t. And they still aren’t. Tucker Carlson (et al.) won’t do an analysis of the Talmud. He knows the Talmud exists, he knows it says Mother Mary was a whore and that Jesus Christ was a wizard who is in hell boiling in a vat of feces, he knows it says all non-Jews are “goyim” animals, he knows there are hundreds of other verses that demonstrate that it is the Jewish tribe as a group that is responsible for the crisis of modernity, not a few bad apples. He knows the Holocaust is a hoax. Yet he says he’s not against Jews, just Israel. I’m sure his reasoning is “the people aren’t ready for it, they are still traumatized by the pile of shoes.” People can rationalize anything. But unlike Joe Rogan, who is a goofy dope who believes inter-dimensional aliens created humans so that humans would create AI, Tucker Carlson I think really does believe in God and Jesus Christ and could blow this whole thing up. But he won’t. He’ll post ExpressVPN ads on Twitter, but he won’t talk about the content of the Talmud. The human mind is a justification machine. It’s a machine that justifies our behavior against the protests of our souls.

To Tucker, and all of the rest of you (you’re all reading this, I know you all read this, everyone knows you all read this): the people are ready to hear an explanation as to what these Jews are up to. And if you don’t do it, no one else will. I can’t do it. If no one is going to actually say what is actually happening, which is this: the Jews are a satanic, alien group that murdered Our Jesus and then proceeded to spend 2,000 years attempting to kill or morally crush all of Christ’s followers. In the 20th century, faked a genocide of themselves to justify a complete silencing of criticism in order to allow for a total takeover of every institution of power in the Western world in order to sadistically kill or destroy every human soul.

In order to be “against Israel but not the Jews,” you would have to believe the mass murder of children in Gaza is not related to fact that OnlyFans, Tinder, and PornHub are all run by Jews. They’re not run by Israel.

The genocide in Gaza has pulled back the veil, it’s shown the world what the Jews are. And the people are ready to hear it. It’s now or never. There has never been a better time for saying this aloud, and the time to do it is running out. This whole Palatir thing is real, and it’s not “ten years down the line” you’re going to be locked into a biometric slave grid with every action tracked and individual and society-wide behavior directed by AI. It’s basically tomorrow.

The CEO of Palantir, Alex Karp, is of course the most Jewish person you’ve ever seen.

Millions are shocked he’s not a Chinese communist, given that he’s trying to do a social credit system against people. Right Tucker?

It’s just a coincidence. He’s a random individual, like the inventor of transgenderism and the purveyors of usury and the CEO of Pfizer are random individuals. It’s a funny thing about the Holocaust: in death, six million random individuals became Jews.

Interesting fact: although exactly six million Jews died in the Holocaust, the shoe pile only has 11.8 million shoes. This is due to the fact that some Jews were one-legged, and other Jews had one of their shoes stolen from them by a wily German when they were entering the death camp. Also, when mothers with infants came to Auschwitz, Germans would drown the babies in buckets. Right there in front of everyone. An organized military force, made up of Germans, running a concentration camp, would, right in front of everyone, take Jewish babies and drown them in buckets. True story.

Nearly ten years ago, I made this meme about it to create awareness:

I did that line-work by hand. It took me like twenty minutes. At least. I thought it was that important to bring attention to the fact that German Nazis would grab Jewish babies from their mothers and drown them in buckets. Still, to this day, few know that during the Holocaust, Germans would grab Jewish babies and drown them in buckets in front of their mothers.

Meanwhile, this is a coincidence:

Any religion could claim abortion is a core part of their value system. Only one does. But it’s just a coincidence that it’s Jews. No relationship at all with what is happening in Gaza, which is really just a crime by a government that just happens, by coincidence again, to be Jewish. It could be any state. Many states have gone on 18 month campaigns bombing refugee camps. Well, actually, no state has ever done anything even remotely like that, ever in human history, but any state could have, and it’s just a coincidence it’s the Jewish one.

Sigh.

It’s not just Tucker. Obviously. It’s everyone. It’s everyone be me and you, dearest reader and true parasocial friend. Everyone knows and everyone knows everyone else knows and everyone knows that everyone knows that the peasants don’t know. But the peasants would listen to their leaders. And if you’re the media, you are their leaders. That’s just the way the digital world works. The magic of electricity.

The reason I would do it all again is not that I’m retarded or a masochist, it’s because it was the right thing to do, and I actually believe in God and Judgement Day and all of this stuff. Like, I believe it as much as I believe I am right now sitting here typing on a computer and smoking a cigarette. I’ve done a lot of sinful things. I’ve done many mortal sins and I will probably do many more. And I know I am going to have to answer for those sins. I cry sometimes thinking about how Jesus Christ was tortured to death so I could get a blowjob (it’s a very funny statement but it’s true, I am not saying it as a joke). But I will tell you this: I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be the guy standing there before God trying to explain how I knew all about the Jews and had the ability to tell the entire world and yet somehow decided not to do so.

[Note to Editor: Rather than bothering you with a message, I’m just going to leave this here: keep the bullet points like that. You can delete this note. Or don’t delete it if you think it’s funnier not to. I’ll leave that to your discretion. It’s probably better to delete it when you edit, because this is off schedule, and you’re not going to edit this until like 4 hours after it’s up, so the people who saw it will be in on a public/secret joke that disappears forever. But it’s your call. I give you full authority to act as you see fit in this matter. UDPATE: Wait no, just leave it, because something goofy like this sort of softens the buzzkill ending of the article. Yeah, for sure, I retract your rights to personal choice in the matter. Just leave this entire note to editor here like this.]

Matt Gaetz hosted a Zero Hedge backed debate between libertarian Dave Smith and (allegedly non-Jewish) neocon global dominationist Robert Spencer this week.

Overall, the debate is mundane and not worth watching. Probably, everyone is familiar with all of the content here, and these debates are sort of just repetitive and tiresome at this point, particularly after the debate between Smith and the pompous pederast Douglas Murray, which kind of put an end to the question of “is America controlled by Jews?”

The topic here is slightly different, given that it is about Iran rather than Palestine, but it’s the same core content, going to the same core question of whether or not America should operate as a proxy of Israel because maybe somehow all of Israel’s goals are good for America. All of Spencer’s talking points are tired, and therefore Smith has no option but to give the same tired responses.

Further, on the specific issue of Iran, the Tucker Carlson debate with Ted Cruz is much better and more fun. I would recommend that to anyone who hasn’t watched it yet. That was just a complete rape and it was hilarious. It also had more interesting content, particularly in relation to Christian Zionism and the direct role that Israel plays in controlling our government.

That interview was like a high stakes MMA fight. It got my heart pounding and I was cheering, jeering, and ooosssshing.

Mainly though, it is just incredible to see an actual top government warmonger subject himself to questioning like this. I think it’s sort of a historic moment, because aside from Trump (who doesn’t really count), no high level politician has ever agreed to a two-hour unedited, unscripted interview with a critical podcaster. (Note: Trump himself is not going to do a podcast interview now on the Iran issue. He did all those podcasts when he was campaigning and could just say anything. So the Tucker-Ted interview is novel, and it’s possible nothing like that will ever happen again after how disastrous it was for Cruz.)

So I don’t recommend the Gaetz hosted debate, unless you’ve got nothing else to watch and you enjoy hearing the same talking points over and over again for some reason. What I would like to recommend is that Matt Gaetz be given another chance. I know he sort of crashed out after Trump set him up by nominating him as AG and then fed him to the sharks. In hindsight, this was clearly a nasty move by Trump to give the impression he was trying to put outsiders in his cabinet but just couldn’t pull it off because outsiders are too into jailbait and blow.

Refresher: After Trump nominated Gaetz, the media brought up old jailbait scandals giving Trump the layup to throw him under the bus, and in this process, he also lost his Congressional seat, because he had to resign from that to accept the AG nomination. Because of Gaetz’ scandals then, Trump’s logic went, he had no choice but to go with the nasty MILF who thinks Epstein killed himself. (Also, nominating Gaetz created problems for Ron DeSantis, who Trump wanted revenge on.) It was a callous play by Trump which destroyed Gaetz’ life.

Though the content was dull, I was impressed with Gaetz’ skills as a host and personality. I think he has potential as a podcaster. He’s also siding with anti-Israel arguments, so what I would really like to see is Gaetz run against Ron DeSantis for Florida governor on a right-wing anti-war, anti-Zionist platform. That would at worst be an awesome shitshow, which would force DeSantis to defend his insane pro-Jewish agenda in a public forum, which will go about as well as it did for Ted Cruz.

So far, Gaetz has only “expressed interest” in running in the 2026 Florida gubernatorial election. I think he should just declare now and get out there and start talking about the insanity of these wars. I’m sure he’s hesitant, because he will get attacked by Trump, but look, Trump is over. He has sealed his fate. The way forward is for MAGA loyalists to say “we’re going to defend MAGA even when Trump won’t.” That’s the play.

Ron DeSantis has passed the most aggressive anti-speech laws in American history in defense of Israel. He’s a very easy target. The guy is Ted Cruz on steroids. And there’s no way he can avoid a televised debate with Gaetz and have a hope to beat him.

I think Gaetz is a good candidate for this and I will support him. In fact, I am presently endorsing Matt Gaetz for Florida Governor.

Whatever happens, it will be huge for his brand, and get him off of this “50,000 viewer podcast” trap he’s currently bogged down in. If he goes out there as the total America First anti-war gubernatorial candidate and publicly stands up to DeSantis’ lunatic warmongering, then even if he loses the election, he can come back to the podcast scene with a fury and actually make some real money, then maybe go back into politics again later if he feels like it. It’s a total win-win. No possible bad outcome.