The head of the Israeli lobbying group the Anti-Defamation League was in Israel last, where he appeared to call for using Israeli terrorist tactics to maim and murder “antisemites” who criticize Jews on the internet.

Speaking before the Israeli Knesset, Jonathan Greenblatt bemoaned the fact that people are complaining about Jewish behavior online, saying that Jews are “losing the battle” against “antisemitism.” He framed the fight to silence critics of Israel on the internet as the “eighth front” of Israel’s “seven front war.” He then said that last year’s terrorist attack against Lebanon, which involved explosives being implanted into pagers which were detonated to mutilate and murder Lebanese people, should be the inspiration for silencing people on the internet.

It would have been bad enough if he had said this as a joke, but based on the context and the way he spoke, there is no indication he was joking.

“We need the kind of genius that manufactured Apollo Gold Pagers and infiltrated Hezbollah for over a decade to prepare for this battle,” Greenblatt said.

He went on to state that terrorism is a characteristic of Jewish people: “This is the kind of ingenuity and inventiveness that have always been a hallmark of the State of Israel, that have always been a characteristic of the Jewish people. I know we can do it.”

You can watch the video above to get the full context of the statement, and see if you think he is saying something different. The most generous interpretation would be that he is saying that it took a certain kind of cunning to do the terrorist attack against Hezbollah and that this type of cunning is need to silence critics of the Jews. It is seemingly unfathomable that he would want to leave people with the impression he was calling for terrorism against internet critics, and furthermore, he calls on the Israeli Defense Force to form a group to shut down these online critics, which definitely implies he is talking about real violence being used.

However, even if we give him the benefit of the doubt and suppose he is calling for some kind of metaphorical terrorism, we must ask what exactly it is he is talking about doing to prevent people from holding opinions he opposes.

Believing that Jews should not slaughter children in Gaza, or that they shouldn’t push child transsexualism, mass immigration, pornography, abortion, and other socially deleterious schemes in the West, is an opinion. How can you stop people from having an opinion, other than by killing them? What are the other options?

The ADL is primarily a censorship group, which lobbies governments to pass laws criminalizing the criticism of Jews, and lobbying Silicon Valley to silence critics of Jews online. This is obviously anti-American, fundamentally, but the ADL is one of many Jewish groups which engages in this activity. Internet censorship is ubiquitous, and even the supposed “free speech absolutist” Elon Musk has recently begun silencing his critics on Twitter.

Jewish groups successfully lobbied for TikTok to be banned in America due to the fact that the Chinese owners feel that Americans have a right to criticize Israel in a way that no American company allows them to.

However, none of this has to do with the government of Israel. If Greenblatt was suggesting that Israel should engage in more active lobbying for internet censorship and hate speech laws, he could have simply said that. Instead, he invoked terrorism and called for the IDF to fight people who criticize Jews online.

Being on the frontlines of criticism of Israel and the collective behavior of individual Jews, I have personally had an adversarial relationship with the ADL for more than a decade, regularly being a target of slander and hate from Jonathan Greetblatt and others in the organization, so this call for the Israeli military to use terrorism to silence people like me is particularly disturbing.

At this point, there is so much criticism directed at Israel, and to some extent also the behavior of diaspora Jews, that it would be virtually impossible to censor all of it. Twitter and Facebook would have to ban tens or hundreds of millions of people, and banning that many people would definitely result in those who weren’t banned criticizing Jews for getting all of those people banned.

However, if the Jews began assassinating critics, that may prove to be a significant deterrent.

Although I’ve said it many times, I want to put it on the record again that I am in very good health, I did not take the coronavirus vaccine so I am not at risk of dying suddenly, and I would never, under any circumstances, kill myself.

The video linked above is a week old and has fewer than 100 views. I have not seen this story reported anywhere else. I hope that others will clip the relevant portions and spread them on Twitter and elsewhere. I would like to see Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, Judge Napalitano, and others with large platforms addressing these statements by Greenblatt and demanding that he explain what exactly it is he is calling for when he says that terrorism needs to be used to silence people whose opinions he does not like.

The Jewish agenda to shut down the freedom of speech was already extreme enough, but calling for violence to be used as a solution to internet posts takes this into a whole new realm. If America was a serious country, traveling to a foreign country and calling for state terrorism against American citizens would be grounds for serious criminal charges.

Bezos is making a documentary about Melania Trump and Zuck is ending this “fact-checker” bullshit.

All the tech people are being very nice to Trump this time around, and the only price is infinity Indians forever.

The Hill:

Social media giant Meta on Tuesday announced a series of changes to its content moderation policies, including the elimination of its fact-checking program, in what CEO Mark Zuckerberg said was an effort to embrace free speech.

“We’re going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms,” Zuckerberg said in a video posted Tuesday morning.

“More specifically, here’s what we’re going to do. First, we’re going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X, starting in the U.S.”

The changes mark a major move for the parent company of Instagram and Facebook and follows a series of other changes the company has made in recent weeks as President-elect Trump heads into his second term later this month.

Meta’s yearslong fact-checking program enlisted the help of third-party fact-checkers that moderated posts in more than 60 languages. The company stated the practice eventually became too restrictive of posts over the years.

Yeah, I think it became effectively impossible to have any kind of free discussion at all. You were pretty much just allowed to agree with the government, and say nothing else.

Unless you were Ben Shapiro. Then you were allowed to complain about men in women’s sports for ten minutes before doing 50 minutes on how “Israel is our values.”

What we are seeing is the establishing of a new status quo. I don’t think it’s going to be very much better. The establishment just dropping some of the extreme “woke” stuff. I’m still banned from everything, and Elon Musk recently did censorship against Laura Loomer and others, so we’re not going to see any real change emerging. Everything is going to relate to dumb culture war issues, which literally do not matter at all.

I’m sure this will feel like a big victory to Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh, who have made huge careers talking about trannies in sports and how DEI is racist. But no one who cares about anything that actually matters is going to be given anything to get excited about.

What’s more, the Trump Administration has indicated it wants many more immigrants as well as further censorship of people who talk about the Jews. So while the new status quo might include some things that seem good, we’ve been promised that other things are going to get worse, potentially significantly worse.

Before Christmas, people were accusing me of being negative. However, I think after the Elon Musk “I’ll fuck your face because they’re culturally superior to you” fiasco, no one is accusing me of that anymore.

I will note that I don’t think Zuckerberg ever wanted to censor anyone and was actually mad about the Biden Administration forcing him to do so. I don’t think he actually cares about “freedom of speech” as an abstract value, but this censorship program was bad for business. He might even be willing to go along with a commission to imprison the people in the Biden Administration, including Anthony Fauci, who conspired to censor the American people. Of course, there is zero chance Trump would ever put together any such commission.

HUGE: A federal court judge rules — in a case brought by the Trump DOJ and continued by the Biden DOJ — that Google is an illegal monopoly and violated anti-trust laws by abusing their search monopoly by forcing consumers to use its search engine.

Remedies to be decided next.

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) August 5, 2024

I should also note that this decision is very beneficial to @rumblevideo, which has long been suing Google on the ground that it illegally abuses its search engine anti-trust power to suffocate competitors.

I wrote about Rumble’s big 2022 victory allowing the case to proceed: pic.twitter.com/AYZO3fLCnA

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) August 5, 2024

This is theoretically a very big deal.

Apple stock dropped because it’s now illegal for Google to pay Apple $20 billion per year to make Google their default search engine.

Reuters:

A U.S. judge ruled on Monday that Google violated antitrust law, spending billions of dollars to create an illegal monopoly and become the world’s default search engine, the first big win for federal authorities taking on Big Tech’s market dominance.

The ruling paves the way for a second trial to determine potential fixes, possibly including a breakup of Google parent Alphabet, which would change the landscape of the online advertising world that Google has dominated for years.

It is also a green light to aggressive U.S. antitrust enforcers prosecuting Big Tech, a sector that has been under fire from across the political spectrum.

“The court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” District Judge Amit Mehta wrote. The search engine giant controls about 90% of the online search market, and 95% on smartphones.

The “remedy” phase could be lengthy, followed by potential appeals to the District of Columbia Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court. The legal wrangling could play out into next year, or even 2026.

Shares of Google parent Alphabet fell 4.5% on Monday as part of a broad tech share decline. Google advertising was 77% of Alphabet’s total sales in 2023.

…

Mehta noted that Google had paid $26.3 billion in 2021 alone to ensure that its search engine is the default on smartphones and browsers, and to keep its dominant market share.

…

The ruling is the first major decision in a series of cases taking on alleged monopolies in Big Tech. This case, filed by the Trump administration, went before a judge from September to November of last year.

We always say the government never does anything good. That’s maybe a slight exaggeration.

This isn’t a minor issue in the scheme of things, but obviously, Google losing market share would be a good thing in theory.

What I will say: it matters a lot less now with AI prepared to make search completely obsolete anyway.

Here’s our statement on today’s decision in the DOJ case:

“This decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available. We appreciate the Court’s finding that Google is ‘the industry’s highest quality…

— Google Communications (@Google_Comms) August 5, 2024

Sorry, I do not believe in “addiction.” This is dumb retard nonsense. There is something called “bad behavior” and another thing called “poor decision making.” We don’t need psychologists to explain this to us.

Just listen to Peter Hitchens.

“Addiction” is nonsense.

There is no proof that this thing exists.

It is disgusting that we have to use this term to talk about bad behavior.

People mess with their phones because they are anti-social, they don’t care about the people around them, and they decide to make selfish decisions.

I say this as someone who has had life long substance abuse problems. Since I was a teenager, I have engaged in [INSERT VARIOUS THINGS]. Why did I do this? Because I am an irresponsible person (sometimes) who (sometimes) makes bad decisions.

I did not have a “disease.” I was not compelled by something beyond my own consciousness. That is ridiculous. There is no evidence for this theory.

But, yes: people use their phones too much and that leads to further bad behavior.

These are personal decisions made by individuals who have free will.

The Guardian:

Young people with internet addiction experience changes in their brain chemistry which could lead to more addictive behaviours, research suggests.

The study, published in PLOS Mental Health, reviewed previous research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine how regions of the brain interact in people with internet addiction.

They found that the effects were evident throughout multiple neural networks in the brains of young people, and that there was increased activity in parts of the brain when participants were resting.

I actually do believe that repeated bad behaviors change your brain chemistry.

They change your soul, and what is your brain if not the body of your soul?

(The Hitchins debate above shows the brain scans. I agree with this. I’m not saying the scans are fake. But frankly, we do not understand the brain all that well. These “experts” don’t even admit souls exist – even while they support tranny theories that say souls are trapped in the wrong bodies.)

At the same time, there was an overall decrease in the functional connectivity in parts of the brain involved in active thinking, which is the executive control network of the brain responsible for memory and decision-making.

The research found that these changes resulted in addictive behaviours and tendencies in adolescents, as well as behavioural changes linked to mental health, development, intellectual ability and physical coordination.

Yeah, dude.

Bad behavior leads to further bad behavior.

Sometimes we call this “sin.” Using your phone too much is not actually a sin, but it is obviously a bad behavior, and bad behaviors – whether they are sins or not – lead to further bad behaviors.

Max Chang, the study’s lead author and an MSc student at the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (GOS ICH), said: “Adolescence is a crucial developmental stage during which people go through significant changes in their biology, cognition and personalities.

“As a result, the brain is particularly vulnerable to internet addiction-related urges during this time, such as compulsive internet usage, cravings towards usage of the mouse or keyboard and consuming media.

“The findings from our study show that this can lead to potentially negative behavioural and developmental changes that could impact the lives of adolescents. For example, they may struggle to maintain relationships and social activities, lie about online activity and experience irregular eating and disrupted sleep.”

Bad behavior leads to more bad behavior.

That is why we should engage in good behavior.

We should avoid all sins (insofar as we can) and also avoid all negative behaviors (insofar as we can).

No one ever said life was going to be easy.

In fact, life is the hardest thing ever.

The easiest thing ever is engaging in bad behaviors that make life appear less difficult.

In actual fact, bad behavior makes life much more difficult.

Being online all the time is a very bad behavior and it makes your life much worse.

90% of U.S. adults and 96% of teenagers say they are online every day.@Doctorsuevarma explains the symptoms of internet addiction — and suggests what both parents and kids can do to manage it. pic.twitter.com/wUUGM4EUls

— CBS Mornings (@CBSMornings) May 24, 2024

I work online, so I’m online a lot.

But I do not own a cellular phone. I install all the apps on my laptop. If people want to meet me in real life, they have to arrange a time for the meeting, and then be there (or not). I don’t carry around my laptop like a cellphone.

When I am sitting alone in public, instead of looking at a phone, I either sit and think about my deranged ideas, or share those deranged ideas with strangers.

I’m not even recommending this as a life choice (though it is one way to live). But I would recommend that you not sit around on your phone all the time. It’s absurd, to live like this. There is a big, beautiful world out there, all around you, and sometimes beauty is found in the most unlikely of places.

My advice to everyone is always the same as it’s always been: keep it real.

“Touch grass” is a gay retard meme, because the only people who would ever say that are “extremely online” persons who want to mock you for having the same problem as they have. You can touch grass or not – most of it in public places is sprayed with chemicals that cause hormonal disorders, penis shrinkage, and cancer.

But being in nature is a good idea. Being alone with your thoughts is a good idea. If it is painful to be alone with your thoughts – and if you have any bit of intelligence at all, it is extremely painful (can confirm) – than I would advise you to confront that pain, and to learn to love that pain.

When the pain of my thoughts becomes tough, I say:

Our Father who art in Heaven, hallowed by Thy Name. Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will be done, on earth, as it is in Heaven. Given us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. Lead us not into temptation, and deliver us from evil. Amen.

And:

Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

You can also say the Hail Mary. I do that sometimes, but have been doing it less, as I’ve come to believe that promoting it as the main prayer is a conspiracy to draw us away from Jesus. (That doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with it, or we shouldn’t say it, I’m just saying that if you are asking Mary for intervention more than you are asking Jesus for mercy, something has to have gone wrong. The Holy Mother would never want to distract us from Jesus Christ.)

Whether it is the masturbation or fornication (sins) or overindulgences in internet, alcohol, drugs, or anything else (potentially bad behaviors which can become sins if overdone), you need to understand that these are personal choices that you are responsible for, and you can change your life if you want to do so.

Do not believe this “addiction” bullshit. It is total nonsense. Clearly, the deeper you get into sin or other bad behavior, the harder it is to get out. It’s just a hole you are digging for yourself. But always take personal responsibility.

There are so many things in this world that you have no control over. You need to focus on the things you do have control over. In that, you will find peace.

Basically, the singular use case for Elon Musk’s Starlink was to bring the internet to remote tribal areas that had no need for the internet. It was a really weird proposition.

The results, probably, should have been predictable.

Another job well done by the true genius Elon Musk.

New York Post:

A reclusive tribe in the Amazon finally got hooked up to the internet, thanks to Elon Musk — only to be torn apart by social media and pornography addiction, elders complain.

Brazil’s 2,000-member Marubo tribe has been left bitterly divided by the arrival of the Tesla founder’s Starlink service nine months ago, which connected the remote rainforest community along the Ituí River to the web for the first time.

“When it arrived, everyone was happy,” Tsainama Marubo, 73, told The New York Times. “But now, things have gotten worse. Young people have gotten lazy because of the internet, they’re learning the ways of the white people.”

The Marubo are a chaste tribe, who even frown upon kissing in public — but Alfredo Marubo (all Marubo use the same last name) said he is anxious that the arrival of the service, which delivers super-fast internet to far-flung corners of the planet and has been billed as a game-changer by Musk, could upend standards of decorum.

Alfredo said many young Marubo men have been sharing porn videos in group chats and he has already observed more “aggressive sexual behavior” in some of them.

“We’re worried young people are going to want to try it,” he said of the kinky sex acts they’ve suddenly been exposed to on screen. “Everyone is so connected that sometimes they don’t even talk to their own family.”

Starlink works by connecting antennas to 6,000 low-orbiting satellites. The necessary antennas were donated to the tribe by American entrepreneur Allyson Reneau.

…

One teen told The Times that she now dreams of traveling of the world, while another says she aspires to become a dentist in São Paulo.

Sigh.

Yeah…

The Marubo, an isolated Amazon tribe, connected to high-speed internet in September through Elon Musk’s Starlink. Jack Nicas, our Brazil bureau chief, visited the tribe’s remote villages to see what the internet has changed for them. https://t.co/JXwhPDcR3L pic.twitter.com/7CKCHsY4QX

— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 2, 2024

What was the use case supposed to be here, Elon?

Why would primitive jungle people need the internet, other than to watch porn and have their women be inspired to “travel the world”?

There was something in Star Trek called the “Prime Directive” that should have been followed by all of the colonists of the colonial era. Back then, of course, they didn’t have Star Trek, so maybe they never thought of it.

But I guarantee you: Elon Musk has watched Star Trek and knows what the Prime Directive is.

For any of you who don’t know, here’s a two minute clip with Captain Picard explaining it:

Basically: you should let people develop on their own to a certain level before you start giving them high level technology.

In Star Trek though, it was always these dilemmas of how the crew of the Enterprise could help less developed people with their higher technologies. Like for example, if the Enterprise had the ability to cure a disease but didn’t want to expose the less developed people to the disease-curing technology.

There was no possible way that dropping off internet access to jungle people was going to help them.

But Elon Musk is just like “let’s flood these primitive jungle people with hardcore porn to help humanity rising.”

Shouldn’t he be forced to explain why he is doing this?

Frankly, he should be taken to the Hague over this.

There is no possible justification for doing this to these jungle people. It’s sheer cruelty.

🚨BREAKING: Historic privacy settlement in which Google agrees to delete browsing data collected in Incognito Mode and more. Quotes:

➡️”Google with this Settlement agrees to rewrite its disclosures to inform users that “Google” collects private browsing data, including by… pic.twitter.com/CXkA4Z40uZ

— Luiza Jarovsky (@LuizaJarovsky) April 1, 2024

Why do people not just use Brave?

How are people still using Chrome, knowing that it is recording everything they do?

The Guardian:

Google agreed to destroy billions of records to settle a lawsuit claiming it secretly tracked the internet use of people who thought they were browsing privately in its Chrome browser’s incognito mode.

Users alleged that Google’s analytics, cookies and apps let the Alphabet unit improperly track people who set Google’s Chrome browser to “incognito” mode and other browsers to “private” browsing mode.

They said this turned Google into an “unaccountable trove of information” by letting it learn about their friends, favorite foods, hobbies, shopping habits and the “most intimate and potentially embarrassing things” they hunt for online.

Yeah, people use “incognito mode” to look at porn.

This ends up being a massive blackmail database.

Basically, everyone is looking at some kind of weird porn, but they’re all embarrassed about it, for obvious reasons.

Terms of the settlement were filed on Monday in the Oakland, California, federal court, and require approval by US district judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The class action began in 2020, covering millions of Google users who used private browsing since 1 June 2016.

Under the settlement, Google will update disclosures about what it collects in “private” browsing, a process it has already begun. It will also let incognito users block third-party cookies for five years.

“The result is that Google will collect less data from users’ private browsing sessions, and that Google will make less money from the data,” the plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote.

Google’s entire business model is spying on people and selling the data to advertisers and the government.

People should not be involved with this company.

wow. super interesting data point on impact to Google’s revenues from 3rd party cookie blocking (aka privacy)… connecting dots.

Left: Google’s redacted estimate of impact on blocking 3rd party tracking cookies in Chrome’s private mode (aka Incognito).

Right: unsealed today. pic.twitter.com/B1SBG2PlJg

— Jason Kint (@jason_kint) April 1, 2024

Our CEO Shou Chew’s response to the TikTok ban bill: pic.twitter.com/7AnDYOLD96

— TikTok Policy (@TikTokPolicy) March 13, 2024

It’s a free market, goy.

Unless the Jew-run government decides it isn’t, in which case they just steal your company.

RT:

TikTok CEO Shou Chew has claimed that banning the social media platform in the US will endanger the livelihoods of thousands of Americans. His comments came after the House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday that could force TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to sell the platform or face a nationwide ban.

Should the bill be passed by the Senate, President Joe Biden has said he will sign it into law. Responding to the House vote, Chew called the decision “disappointing” and warned of its potential consequences.

“This legislation, if signed into law, will lead to a ban of TikTok in the United States. Even the bill sponsors admit that that’s their goal. This bill gives more power to a handful of other social media companies,” Chew said in a video posted on X (formerly Twitter).

I’m surprised Elon hasn’t banned him yet.

After all, this is disinformation. It’s basically election meddling by the communists.

“Our platform matters to the small business owners who rely on TikTok to make ends meet and to the teachers who inspire millions of students to learn and to everyone who discovers and finds joy on TikTok,” he added.

“You will take billions of dollars out of the pockets of creators in small businesses. You will put more than 300,000 American jobs at risk.”

Chew signaled that TikTok will exercise its “legal rights” to prevent a ban, and urged users to support its efforts.

“I encourage you to keep sharing your stories, share them with your friends, share them with a family, share them with the senators, protect your constitutional rights, make your voices heard,” he stated.

Hilariously – and this is so funny – Jewish former Trump administration official Steven Mnuchin is trying to buy the company, no doubt for pennies on the yuan.

Axios:

Steven Mnuchin is recruiting an investor group to buy TikTok, the former Treasury Secretary said Thursday.

TikTok’s future is in peril after the House passed a bipartisan bill that would force China-based ByteDance to sell TikTok or face a ban in the U.S.

“I think the legislation should pass and I think it should be sold,” Mnuchin said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Thursday. “It’s a great business and I’m going to put together a group to buy TikTok.”

“This should be owned by U.S. businesses. There’s no way that the Chinese would ever let a U.S. company own something like this in China,” Mnuchin said.

It’s a moral issue for him.

He thinks it’s only patriotic if the company is owned by foreign Jews rather than foreign Chinese.

That’s the free market.

It’s what America is all about.

(In terms of whether this law will pass, I have no predictions. It seems actually insane, but who knows. A lot of insane stuff is going on these days. It’s not more insane than child trannies, and we have a lot of those. So who knows. If it does pass, it’s yet another massive blow to the moronic claims that America is a “rules-based order.” This is a country of Jewish bandits, who create new “rules” in real time.)

Meanwhile, at the Daily Stormer, CEO Andrew Anglin is preparing to steadily consume a bottle of Maker’s Mark and listen to a fully remastered version of the Grateful Dead live at Roosevelt Stadium in 1976. It’s four hours long.

The extraordinarily successful media mogul will not be firing anyone, though he may fire his gun into the air during “Sugar Magnolia.”

In fact, in 2024, Daily Stormer CEO Andrew Anglin gave his entire staff generous raises (except for one Romanian boy who refuses to follow the rules).

New York Times:

Executives at Vice Media are planning to lay off several hundred of its more than 900 employees over the next week, eliminating staff from its digital publishing division, according to a company memo sent to staff on Thursday from Bruce Dixon, the chief executive.

The cuts will be the latest in a series of severe cutbacks that the company has endured in recent years, winnowing the globe-spanning digital colossus to a husk of its former self. Over the past half-decade, Vice has had near annual layoffs and mounting losses, and has filed for bankruptcy, making it the poster child for the battered digital-media industry.

It’s a battered child, alright.

It’s like a retarded boy somebody locked in a basement.

When Vice emerged from bankruptcy last year, some observers hoped its new owners — a consortium led by the private-equity firm Fortress Investment Group — would reinvest to return the company to growth.

Instead, Fortress has decided to make sweeping cuts, as part of an attempt to stem the endless tide of red ink. The company is planning to inform employees of its new business strategy in the next week.

Mr. Dixon also said in the memo, which was seen by The New York Times, that the company would no longer publish on Vice.com.

“As we navigate the ever-evolving business landscape, we need to adapt and best align our strategies to be more competitive in the long-term,” he wrote. He also said Vice was in advanced talks to sell Refinery29, the company’s women-focused publishing division.

Totally shutting down publishing on VICE.com, trying to dump Refinery29 on some poor saps.

I win again.

Like always.

These people spent years trying to bury me.

These faggots were doing documentaries about me.

It was a lot of effort for a lot of nothing.

Last year saw the most traffic on the Daily Stormer of any year since the 2017 shutdown. I’m a cannonball through a house on fire.

Now, they are out of work and totally unemployable. Saying “learn to code” would be ridiculous at this point – the AI is doing the coding now. The best advice I can give is to learn to shoot and go join the Ukraine military.

The fall of VICE is a Total Aryan Victory, Total Anglin Victory.

Which of my enemies are even still online? I think most of them are dead.

A lot of people are starting to learn they shouldn’t fuck with me.

The Best Ever News Site on the internet will both outpace and outlive you.

I’m going to live to piss on all of your graves.

There’s only one way any of this ends.

Previously: Homosexual Republican Censorship Advocates Cotton and Hawley are Tumors on the Soul of America

Several Senate GOP homosexuals led by notable fag-hag Marsha Blackburn have come together with the Democrats to support the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) in order to mass censor the internet in an even more extreme way.

Last year, it was discovered that the Biden White House was engaged in mass social media censorship, demanding that Twitter and Facebook censor whatever they wanted censored. This year, it was revealed that the White House also targeted Amazon.

This would be a great place for the Republicans to stand up for freedom of speech. However, they have mostly ignored the issue, instead simply whining that it shouldn’t only be conservatives that are censored, claiming that these companies should also be censoring Democrats.

KOSA is ostensibly intended to prevent kids from committing suicide because of materials they see on social media. This week, a group of organizations that support the bill took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal, calling on Chuck Schumer to bring the bill for a vote. According to Congress.gov, the bill currently has 46 co-sponsors in the Senate, including notorious GOP homos Josh Hawley and Lindsey Graham.

The “someone please think of the children” groups backing the bill are run by parents whose children killed themselves. The parents, instead of taking responsiblity for their own kids, blame the internet for the deaths.

During last weeks Senate hearing with social media heads, sicko Hawley attacked Mark Zuckerberg, claiming that he should be reading every single private message sent on Facebook, and demanding money from him.

Hawley appeared to be menstruating, exhibiting extreme emotional volatility and unhingement as he lashed out at Zuckerberg. He was hyping up this bill, exploiting the most base emotional tripe.

Prominent fag-hag Marsha Blackburn introduced KOSA with the Jew Richard Blumenthal, initially claiming that it would censor materials turning kids into trannies. She later admitted that it would not prevent children from being turned into trannies, but continued promoting the censorship bill anyway.

The bill will enable state attorneys general to simply ban whatever they want from social media, claiming it is harmful to children. It is, far and beyond, the most extreme censorship bill ever introduced by the US government. Remember that the White House was acting illegally, without the approval of Congress or the courts, when they launched their mass censorship program. Biden’s people were doing this in secret, with implied threats against companies which refused to go along with their agenda. KOSA would institutionalize totally arbitrary judgements about banning material from social media. According to the bill, basically anything that can be claimed to “harm children” can be banned, and basically all content that exists can be construed as somehow harmful to children.

Along with mass censorship of all different kinds of content, the bill calls for an extensive age-verification system that would, in theory, require everyone who uses the internet to submit proof of their age in order to access virtually any content. This would mean a massive national or even global database of everyone’s ID as everything they look at on the internet is tracked and recorded.

The bill is clearly Unconstitutional, as the government has no right to censor social media like this, nor does it have the right to demanding everyone be spied on in order to use a communications network. However, this current Supreme Court has repeatedly endorsed things that are obviously Unconstitutional, so there is no reason to believe they would overturn KOSA.

One would think that the Republicans would be taking a hard line in favor of freedom of speech, given the Democrat position against it, but as is the case with America’s foreign wars, we see widespread bipartisan agreement on censorship being a good thing.

The fact that Republicans are involved in this insane plan to mass censor the internet, as well as engage in extreme surveillance, shows that the Republican Party has no direction at all, and that Republican politicians have no interest in understanding what their voters want, and would instead rather manipulate them with stupid, baby nonsense about protecting children from the internet.

I thought porn made people less sexual in real life?

Remember when they were telling college guys to jack off before they go to parties so they wouldn’t be driven to rape? They admitted masturbation lowers testosterone, and said it was better for young men to masturbate before being around women.

Now masturbation makes men sexually violent?

It’s almost like the society will do everything to attack boys and men – they’ll just float any excuse at all.

The Guardian:

Boys are watching violent porn on their smartphones then going on to attack girls, police have said, as new data showed children are now the biggest perpetrators of sexual abuse against other children.

Police data shows there has been a quadrupling of sexual offences against children, in what officers say is the most authoritative analysis of offending against youngsters.

The report from the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) said the offending by adults against children was usually more serious, but said they were alarmed by the growth of sexual offending by those aged 17 or under.

In one case a child of four was referred to police after allegedly using a smartphone to upload an indecent image of a sibling. Police declined to give any more details.

Okay, well.

I don’t even believe that happened.

In 2022 a total of 107,000 reports were made to police in England and Wales alleging sexual offences against children, ranging from rapes and, in a quarter of cases, to the making and sharing of indecent images.

The NPCC said 52% of alleged offenders were children, compared with around one third a decade ago.

Police received reports of 14,800 rapes and sexual assaults against children aged 10 to 17 where the suspect was classed as a child, the overwhelming majority being boys.

Ian Critchley, the NPCC lead for child protection, said: “This is predominantly a gender-based crime of boys committing offences against girls.

wait a minute 😳 pic.twitter.com/dvswW8OEJb

— non aesthetic things (@PicturesFoIder) January 1, 2024

Critchley said the clear-up rate – where someone is charged or cautioned – was 12% where a child is physically attacked and 11% for indecent images offences. The clear-up rate for child-on-child attacks is 15% for sexual assault and 12% for rape.

He said offences involving AI were already being reported to police. These include “nudification” where the photo of a person – usually female – is digitally stripped of clothing to make it appear as if they are naked.

Oh, so men are collaborating with AI to abuse the innocent princesses, huh?

Imagine my shock.

It’s not clear why pornography is legal at all. But this is just a total attack on men, and an attack on AI.

Great from the Earl of Leicester speaking about the proliferation of violent pornography, danger of smartphones and inappropriate sexual explicit RSE in schools pic.twitter.com/saFsw2A3Nn

— Family Education Trust (@FamEdTrust) December 7, 2023