Why can’t America remain an American state?

Why can’t Germany remain a German state?

Why can’t France remain a French State?

Why can’t Poland remain a Polish state?

Why can’t Britain remain a British state?

Why can’t… you get the point.

Breitbart:

An Amnesty International official said his organization is opposed to Israel continuing to exist as a Jewish state, prompting a rare condemnation from all 25 Jewish House Democrats.

“We are opposed to the idea — and this, I think, is an existential part of the debate — that Israel should be preserved as a state for the Jewish people,” Paul O’Brien, the human rights watchdog’s U.S. director, was cited by the Jewish Insider as saying at a luncheon with the Women’s National Democratic Club in Washington.

O’Brien was slammed for taking a position on how an established state should self-define.

He also claimed U.S. polls showing overwhelming U.S. Jewish support for Israel are inaccurate and defended his organization’s recent report accusing Israel of “apartheid.”

In a rare move, all 25 Jewish House Democrats on Monday signed onto a statement denouncing O’Brien’s comments.

“As Jewish Members of the House of Representatives, we represent diverse views on a number of issues relating to Israel. However, we are in full agreement that Mr. [Paul] O’Brien’s patronizing attempt to speak on behalf of the American Jewish community is alarming and deeply offensive,” the statement said.

According to The Times of Israel, this kind of unanimity is extremely rare among Jewish Democrats, especially on Jewish issues or issues relating to Israel.

In one example cited, Reps. Elaine Luria of Virginia and Dean Phillips of Minnesota have condemned comments by fellow Democrat Ilhan Omar as antisemitic, while Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois has joined with Omar to combat antisemitism. Jewish Democrats are also split in their stances towards the Iran nuclear deal, with some in favor of President Joe Biden’s efforts to reenter the deal, while others are vehemently opposed.

O’Brien’s comments sparked outrage from a wide spectrum of Jewish groups.

“If there was any doubt about Amnesty’s credibility as a legitimate voice of authority, it is now abundantly clear that they are firmly entrenched in the cadre of extremist anti-Israel provocateurs,” William Daroff, the CEO of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, said.

“It is clear that their true vision is a Middle East without Israel as a Jewish state.”

Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, called on O’Brien to apologize.

“Your obsessive, relentless focus on Israel, and the erasure of the Jewish right to self-determination illustrates a dangerous degree of bias,” he tweeted.

The report pointed out even far-left Jewish groups that often criticize Israel were outraged.

“Polling shows the vast majority of American Jews, like J Street, support Israel’s future as a democratic state and homeland for the Jewish people,” the dovish J Street said on Twitter. “Amnesty USA would be well-served to stick to its expertise in human rights + international law — and not try to assess Jewish public opinion.”

The radical Americans for Peace Now praised Amnesty’s human rights advocacy, but said the group should not overstep boundaries.

…

Amnesty International accused Israel of being an apartheid state in a scathing and error-filled report released earlier this year. Last month, Amnesty‘s own Israel director came out in staunch opposition of the accusation, saying it was a “punch in the gut” that was making things worse.

We wrote about this.

It’s kind of a confusing situation, as Amnesty is of course run by the Jews.

I guess the bottom line is that they had to say it, because it was just getting ridiculous that these people were talking about the Burmese political crisis (and before that, the Burmese expulsion of Islamic terrorists – meaning they were against the removal of a government they were against), and other tiny conflicts no one cares about all over the world, such as the wigger issue in China. At the same time, they were ignoring a 70 year old human rights crisis that is of central importance to all Moslems, who are a third of the world’s population.

I mean, if you asked any person in any Moslem country to rank geopolitical issues of importance, Israel-Palestine would be the number one for basically all of them. A lot of them would not even be aware of Bangladeshi terrorists being expelled from Burma, or Wigger terrorists allegedly being forced to sing songs in a cotton field.

I think they strategically made these statements about Palestine during the middle of this Ukraine thing so as they wouldn’t really penetrate the news cycle. They can just stop talking about it now, and if anyone asks, point to this thing they said one time.

Last month, President Kushner personally facilitated a $100 billion dollar arms sale to Saudi Arabia in order to bolster their disastrous military campaign against Yemen.

The conflict in Yemen is complicated. The Houthi rebels, who are pro-Iran Shi’ites, have formed an alliance with the legitimate – but “deposed” – government of Ali Abdullah Saleh to fight against a Sunni terrorist coalition composed of terrorist groups ISIS and Al-Qaeda and the “legitimate” governments of the Sunni Arab Gulf states. The Houthis are fiercely anti-Jew and seek to install a state according to the principles of the Iranian revolution (which are quite enlightened compared to Sunni Islamic governments).

International Jewry has marked them for death.

The Saudis have been attacking Yemen for a few years now, with the full support of the US and Israel. These useless ragheads have all the modern weapons oil money can buy, but have an inept officer class, and are making very limited gains, leading many to wonder if they haven’t caught themselves in a quagmire.

The Houthis have steadfastly weathered the multi-national invasion up to this point, so now the Saudis are resorting to starving the whole country to death.

Jews like this filth are behind US support for the Saudis

Unlike in the case of Syria or whenever refugees die heading to Europe, the Jewish media is covering up this mass murder by the Saudis. That’s because Jews hate the Houthis. Missing are all the virtue-signaling professional cuckservatives (like S.E. Cupp) and Kike groups that like to feign concern about the hoax gas-babies of Syria.

#NeverAgain

Max Boot, Elliot Abrams, Bill Kristol and all the other slimy Jewish neocon anti-whites are all applauding this sadistic Saudi campaign, while at the same time demanding “humanitarian intervention” against Assad.

Without our government’s support, the Saudis would’ve been driven back a long time ago. The humiliating defeat at the hands of Saddam while retreating from Kuwait in 1991 should tell you all you need to know about Saudi military incompetence.

The Independent:

Yemen and its people are engulfed by utter devastation. In the two-plus years of the conflict between the Houthi movement and its allies, including former president Ali Abdullah Saleh, and an interim government supported by a Saudi-led military coalition, more than 10,000 people have died – and not just because of violence.

Two thirds of Yemen’s 26 million people live with the reality of famine, with about 7 million already suffering from acute malnutrition. Of this number, more than 3 million face acute malnourishment. In these conditions, a child under five dies every 10 minutes. What’s more, the World Health Organisation is sounding the alarm over a new cholera outbreak in the country, which has killed hundreds of people and put some 150,000 at risk.

…

For starters, the ongoing famine is mostly the result of the Saudi coalition’s ongoing naval blockade, which targets not just weapons but also the food imports on which Yemen is almost entirely dependent.

The fixation on Western involvement also overlooks the actions of the Houthis, who have contributed to the crises underway today – not least via their protracted ground operations and siege of the city of Taiz. Meanwhile, Yemen’s economy has all but collapsed, and its financial institutions are seriously mismanaged. This means that even where food is available, people cannot afford to buy it.

The situation could deteriorate further yet. The Saudis and their allies have long been preparing an attack on the Houthi-controlled port city of Hodeida, so far a crucial supply route and lifeline for Yemenis, and have requested direct US military aid. In response to that request, a bipartisan group of members of Congress wrote to Donald Trump and his defence secretary, James Mattis, demanding that they end the US’s support for the Saudi campaign. The same members have threatened to take legislative action to insist on congressional oversight of the US’s role in the conflict.

Trump’s obsession with Iran will be his government’s downfall. He might think supporting the Jew agenda abroad will give him leeway to execute his program domestically, but that’s not really working out that well, is it?

The Jews want it both ways.

Jews: They will settle for nothing less than everything.

Why is the US involved in the Middle East? Why, if we’re going to be involved, are we backing terrorist rogue states like Saudi Arabia and Israel over civilized entities like Iran or the Houthis?

All of the terrorists killing us in the West belong to the sect of Islam the Saudis export and the Iranians are trying to contain.

The only way any of this makes sense is if you name the Jew. That is why all the mainstream anti-war publications that criticize US foreign policy never adequately address why we’re helping starve millions of children to death in Yemen.

Which is why, like the Houthis, we must curse the Jew!

I catch some flack for being an anti-capitalist. The argument my detractors present is that what America has isn’t “real” capitalism, which is more or less the argument campus social-democrats make when they say Stalin’s Russia and Mao’s China weren’t “real” Marxism – an argument the free marketeers routinely and unironically mock. Then they go on to say that replacing the federal reserve (which is a genuine problem, but for somewhat different reasons than libertarians posit) with their favorite pet rock will solve all the inherit contradictions in the system, even though some of the largest hoarders of say, gold reserves, are people like George Soros.

When all is said and done, no nation is closer to pure unadulterated capitalism today than the United States (except when Goldman Sachs needs more money to gamble with, then we have socialism, because of the conundrum of capitalism, where investment banks simply bribe politicians). Thatcherist and conservative ideologues believe the stock market, where no productive work is done, is how national economic health is gaged. According to this metric, we must be living like kings.

CNBC:

In May 2010, when the Dow Jones industrial average was hovering around 10,000 and the markets were coming out of the financial crisis gloom, one financial blogger wrote, “Someone needs to say this: Dow 20K.”

“The Dow will double before it is cut in half. I want to make this proposition right now, with the Dow around 10,000 and many forecasting 5000. … For the moment, let me just say that it is shorter — much shorter — than most people would think,” Jeff Miller, president of NewArc Investments and editor of financial blog A Dash of Insight, wrote at the time.

Six years later, with the 20,000 level mere points away, Miller uses the same analytical tools to forecast further growth.

…

At the time, he was met with skepticism from his blog’s followers. After all, the Dow was nearly 30 percent below its 2007 peak, and the economy was crawling out of a recession. The unemployment rate that month was 9.6 percent, nearly double today’s rate.

“Everyone was so negative” at the time, and knew market participants had a long list of reasons to worry, Miller said. That’s what led him to consider: “What if things got a little better? What if unemployment got down below 8 percent, or Europe stabilized, or the housing market found a bottom?”

But instead, we’re living like kangz. 

It’s pretty clear that a big explosion that wipes out the savings of millions of little people is right over the horizon, having Steve Mnuchin as a human shield won’t save Trump from the Jewish financial terrorist attack planned for his presidency.

But even then, the stock market rising at a breakneck pace since 2008 has only accompanied a stark decrease in the average Americans wealth and earnings over the last six years. We, the youth, waiting in vain for things to get better so we can finally get married and start to have children, are in the worst shape of all, and my gut feeling is that the numbers are much rosier than what things look like on the ground.

Fox News:

Just half of Americans born in 1984 earned more at age 30 than their parents did at that age, down from 92 percent in 1940, according to research released Thursday by Stanford economist Raj Chetty and five colleagues.

The study found two reasons for the drop: Income inequality has widened, so that even when the economy has grown, fewer Americans have received enough income gains to overtake their parents. And average annual economic growth has slowed since 1980, compared with the 35 years after World War II.

“Reviving the ‘American Dream’ of high rates of mobility will require economic growth that is spread more evenly across the income distribution,” Chetty and his co-authors wrote.

Anxieties about status and economic opportunity formed a backdrop to the 2016 election campaign, with many voters concerned that their children wouldn’t fare as well as they had. Conversely, many younger voters worry that they won’t do as well as their parents, largely because of sluggish income growth and higher costs for housing, health care and student debt.

Chetty’s research suggests that those concerns are well-founded. The decline in mobility occurred across all states but was worse in Rust Belt states such as Michigan and Indiana, both of which backed Donald Trump.

State investments like the GI Bill, high capital gains taxes, etc were important hallmarks that led to the creation of the American middle class. Towards the end of the Cold War, figures like Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher embraced neo-liberalism and mass privatization. In retrospect, the British nation got nothing out of Thatcher’s privatization of Telecom, oil, gas, etc. during the 1980’s and yet, when these companies go bankrupt, the government has been forced to increase taxes on every day people in order to pay their debts just to keep the lights on. The tax-payer gets nothing if they profit, but has to foot the bill if they gamble and lose.

But that’s the big picture on the uselessness of market theories on prosperity. In terms of median income, the news gets even worse for those of us under 35.

So wages are going down as fast as prices are going up.

Jews like Trotsky and Kaganovich killed millions of people in Bolshevik Russia, yet it is today underneath the yoke of almost unchallenged global Judeo-capitalism that our race is on the brink of total extinction. In this race to the bottom, the three ounces of gold (((Peter Schiff))) told you to invest all your savings into won’t buoy you when the bill for state-sponsored usury (what capitalism really is in practice) is smacked down on your increasingly Spartan dinner table.