A damning report on London’s Metropolitan Police finds institutional racism, homophobia and sexism inside the force. https://t.co/rG05eMrZFB pic.twitter.com/UIMYDU54pI

— CNN (@CNN) March 21, 2023

No one has explained what “institutional racism” actually is.

However, even though I don’t understand what it is, I must say: I support it 100% and believe we need a lot more of it.

A lot more.

Reuters:

London’s Metropolitan Police is institutionally racist, misogynistic and homophobic and unable to police itself, an independent review said on Tuesday, heaping pressure on the Met’s new chief to reform Britain’s biggest police force.

The review was commissioned by the then-head of the Met, Cressida Dick, in 2021 after a serving officer was sentenced to life in prison for the rape and murder of a young woman, Sarah Everard, in a case that shocked the country and put a spotlight on the force’s broader work culture.

“This report is rigorous, stark and unsparing. Its findings are tough and for many will be difficult to take. But it should leave no one in any doubt about the scale of the challenge,” Louise Casey, who led the review, said in its foreword.

Casey, a member of parliament’s upper house, found severe failings across the Met that required “radical” reform.

Louise Casey

“We have found widespread bullying, discrimination, institutional homophobia, misogyny and racism, and other unacceptable behaviours,” the report said, adding “women and children do not get the protection and support they deserve”.

The findings come more than two decades after a 1999 inquiry into the murder of Black teenager Stephen Lawrence identified institutional racism within the force.

The 360-page report said the force needed strong leadership, a women’s protection service, and a new children’s strategy, among other recommendations for reform.

“It’s incredibly important we use this opportunity, one of the darkest days in the history of the Met police service, to ensure there is nobody who is in denial,” Mayor of London Sadiq Khan told BBC Radio.

If the cops won’t put down the niggers and faggots – as well as, frankly, the niggerfaggots and faggotniggers – then who will?

If not now, then when?

‘Today is without doubt one of the darkest days in the history of our almost 200 year old Met Police service’

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan spoke to #BBCBreakfast about a damning report which says racism, misogyny and homophobia is at the heart of the forcehttps://t.co/kLiR2WWUK8 pic.twitter.com/m79qihZ9PZ

— BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) March 21, 2023

Jews are up in arms over an anecdote by a Tucker Carlson guest, who mentioned a wealthy black woman in New York City claiming to be a victim of racism should walk a mile in a white woman’s shows.

There is nothing controversial about this statement. The only women who have to worry about walking down the street and being killed/physically assaulted solely for their race (“knock out game”) are white, with niggers as the usual culprit.

The Center for American Progress, and its Antifa staffed blog ThinkProgress (edited by the Jew Judd Legum), is dedicated to racially exterminating white people while engineering positive publicity for Israel, apparently has a problem with this factual statement.

Think Progress:

On Fox News, Tucker Carlson and another white guy explain how hard it is to be white.

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson devoted a segment of his show on Wednesday to criticizing “major websites” for “attacking white people.”

After decrying the alleged “casual racism” in a number of stories published by African-American news and culture site The Root, Carlson interviewed Chadwick Moore, a New York City-based journalist and former liberal who now identifies as a conservative after his September 2016 Out Magazine profile of Milo Yiannopoulos wasn’t well received.

Moore suggested that if black people spent a day in a white person’s shoes, they’d realize that racism isn’t as big of a deal as it’s made out to be.

“If you want to see racism everywhere, if you’re brainwashed to see racism everywhere, or homophobia everywhere, or whatever, then you will,” Moore said. “That’s the world you will live in. You know, I was having a conversation with a woman not too long ago about this — a young, upper middle class black woman. And she was talking about how badly she gets treated here on the street here in New York, and I said to her, ‘What if you lived for one day as a white woman, and you were treated in the exact same way — people were just as rude to you. What then?’”

Carlson responded by indicating he agrees with Moore’s point, saying, “Yeah, it doesn’t make anybody happier to see everything through that lens.”

Regardless of how people are treated on the street, Moore’s comments completely overlooks the role institutional racism in the business world, law enforcement, and the educational system.

This is their party line: a random white person being called a slur and killed by blacks in the street isn’t racist, but some abstract and fallacious explanation for why blacks are in jail at higher rates for rape and murder everywhere in the world is!

That may sound stupid and laughable, but what of it? We can continue reiterating all the proven facts and they will just ignore it.

Even pointing out the fact that the majority of white people don’t want to be replaced by non-whites (shown in every survey) in their land and its happening anyway disproves the institutional racism/white privilege myth.

This isn’t a battle of ideas, it is a war for power between Aryans and Jews.

The Judenpresse is claiming President Trump and Jeff Sessions are planning to use the Department of Justice to take on the anti-white racial quota system known as “affirmative action.”

Allegedly, they’ve obtained a document that EXPLICITLY STATES they want to end DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITES…!

Once upon a time, Ivy League schools placed quotas on Jews to keep their institutions from becoming the self-satirizing clown show they are today and it was called bigotry and a violation of civil rights. At the same time, the Jews who slithered in and took control once the quota system was lifted are now calling it bigotry and a violation of civil rights to oppose doing the exact same thing to America’s dwindling white plurality.

Non-Jewish white people are already highly underrepresented in Ivy League institutions. Even East Asians have their numbers controlled under the quota system (it’s never been explained why they have “white privilege,” but that is the assumed argument). Since Asian parents only care about their kids getting into good schools, Trump could pry their bloc vote away from the Democrats just by intervening on behalf of them and whites here – that is, by removing the system of Affirmative Action and returning to an achievement-based meritocracy.

New York Times:

The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, “intentional race-based discrimination,” cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.

Supporters and critics of the project said it was clearly targeting admissions programs that can give members of generally disadvantaged groups, like black and Latino students, an edge over other applicants with comparable or higher test scores.

They are “generally disadvantaged” – by their genetics. Not the color of their skin.

This Chinese person:

Has roughly the same (if not more) melanin than this Mexican person:

Yet the former has, statistically, 20-25 IQ points more than the latter.

The discrimination against Asian by the affirmative action admissions programs are a tacit establishment admission that race is not a “social construct,” given that it certainly has nothing to do with “skin color.”

A History of an Anti-White Hoax

The system of Affirmative Action was enacted during the 1960s to give blacks more points on exams and advantages when applying for jobs as a crutch for their IQ handicap.

Most liberals and leftists know deep down inside the average black is naturally a lot dumber than the average white, which is why AA isn’t managed in a way that makes sense – for instance, basing it on household income. But you couldn’t do that, because poor whites score higher on intelligence and academic tests than wealthy blacks.

Note: Psychologists used to classify anyone with an IQ <80 as having a severe mental disability, but they changed it to <70 because the former measure was deemed “racist.” Though the average American black IQ is 83, many fall below 80.

So the argument that is made is that blacks should get institutional privilege because many of them are clinically mentally retarded, but there’s a whole bunch of other groups getting in on this racket too.

For example, why do “Latinos” get affirmative action? Aside from any historical context about “discrimination,” so-called “Latinos” aren’t even a race. While most Spanish-speakers in the US are some kind of Mestizo from Mexico, the ones who benefit the most from Affirmative Action are the smart ones with much higher white admixture (or simply Spanish whites born in Mexico) who get lead in their boxing glove when competing against non-Spanish speaking whites.

Just check out the members of the “Latino Leadership Association” at the Yale School of Management:

So in other words, the program doesn’t even do what it originally aimed to do.

The Jewish narrative about white privilege and institutional racism has yet to catch on with anyone other than wealthy gullible white women, recent immigrant groups who want to cut corners, and really slow nig-nogs like Tariq Nasheed.

They have had five decades to make their point and not only did their programs fail, they are now starting to adversely impact average people’s lives as browning America becomes predictably poorer and poorer.

Trump & Sessions are now targeting non-white college applicants under the guise of reversing Affirmative Action https://t.co/j7HUgXnV4y

— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) August 2, 2017

The “white privilege” conspiracy theory is the exact type of Big Lie Adolf Hitler documents the Jews of engaging in in Mein Kampf. To this day, with no sense of irony (why Jews are losing the post-modern culture war), Jews continue to Big Lie by Big Lying about what Hitler said about the Big Lie!

“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice.

All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” – Mein Kampf. Vol I, ch. X

But the Goyim know, so they can big lie no mo’.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.