Trump was excited to discuss his support for IVF during the town hall focused on women’s issues in Cumming, Georgia:

“I want to talk about IVF. I’m the father of IVF!…We’re TOTALLY in favor of IVF…We really are the party for IVF.” pic.twitter.com/PSb2wvDYv4

— Julia 🇺🇸 (@Jules31415) October 16, 2024

Honestly, the woman stuff Trump pushes is worse than the Jewish stuff.

Reuters:

Donald Trump called himself the “father of IVF” at a town hall for women voters on Wednesday, as the Republican presidential candidate tries to convince the crucial voting bloc they can trust him on reproductive issues.

Trump, who is trailing Democrat Kamala Harris in popularity among women voters ahead of the Nov. 5 U.S. election, suggested he was eager to discuss the issue at an all-women event hosted by Fox News in Georgia. The state is among a handful likely to decide the election.

“I want to talk about IVF. I’m the father of IVF, so I want to hear this question,” Trump said.

Hearing that some women were concerned about possible restrictions on fertility treatments, Trump touted his party’s support for the procedure, even though some conservative Republicans do not support in vitro fertilization.

Senate Republicans blocked Democratic-led legislation designed to protect IVF access twice in recent months, with some Republicans arguing the legislation is unnecessary as IVF access is not in danger.

“We really are the party for IVF,” Trump said. “We want fertilization that is all the way, and the Democrats tried to attack us on it, and we’re out there on IVF, even more than them.”

This encourages the worst behavior by women. They believe there is a magic technology that can ensure they can have kids in their 50s.

Remember to not vote.

Watch this video because a lot of people don’t realize IVF means having 10-12 viable embryos, picking your favorites, and dumping the rest. It’s horrific. We are already living in the dystopia you’re afraid of. Vote accordingly. https://t.co/hNriqZGHIt

— Thy Geekdom Come🇻🇦 (@ThyGeekdomCome) October 10, 2024

I have never been more proud of a policy! #IVF pic.twitter.com/YfBWfbLK2T

— Eric Trump (@EricTrump) August 30, 2024

Former President Trump tells NBC News that if he’s re-elected, his administration would not only protect access to IVF, but would have either the government or insurance companies cover the cost of it.

More: https://t.co/ByO77cGtx8 pic.twitter.com/Liv2FgO2XT

— NBC Politics (@NBCPolitics) August 29, 2024

Previously: “Abortion Lord” Trump Wants to Overturn Six-Week Ban, Allow Women to Murder Older Children

The story probably isn’t that this is a $7 billion entitlement giveaway to old women and homosexuals, but rather that it’s a $7 billion entitlement giveaway at all.

Adding massive mounds of entitlements is typically a Democrat thing. The Republicans are scared to remove them, but they do not generally add them.

Also, while I don’t think most Protestants even know what IVF is, Catholics view it as a type of mass abortion.

New York Post:

Former President Donald Trump proposed Thursday that in-vitro fertilization (IVF) be made free for wannabe parents — a sweeping pitch that could transfer as much as $7 billion in annual costs to the government and insurance companies, experts tell The Post.

The Trump team hasn’t specified how the policy would be adopted, but the quickest way is likely through pending legislation requiring insurance companies to consider infertility a covered medical condition or through amending former President Barack Obama’s signature 2010 healthcare law.

It’s funny… I remember the first thing he wanted to do in 2017 was repeal Obamacare.

Now he’s bloating it further.

Strange…

If Trump, 78, manages to become the 47th president, he could also issue executive orders expanding free IVF coverage to all federal workers, military members and veterans, who currently are eligible only in limited cases — though such orders would likely face legal challenges.

“Politicians promise and overpromise all the time,” Gerald Kominski, senior fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, told The Post Friday.

“In this specific case, what [Trump’s] promising has never been done with regard to healthcare in this country.”

The price tag for IVF is hefty — with treatments costing $15,000 to $20,000 per cycle, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

…

If enacted, a free-IVF mandate would be a major bipartisan accomplishment for Trump, who in his first term similarly breathed new life into long-stalled criminal justice reforms, forcing through a bipartisan package known as the First Step Act after the policies languished for years.

…

The Trump IVF plan got a range of reactions from Republicans, with some championing it as a bold pro-family initiative while others — especially abortion opponents —shared concerns due to IVF’s process of creating and destroying embryos.

IVF actually kills more lives than a single abortion.

238,000 patients attempted IVF in 2021. If clinics created 8 embryos per patient (they don’t keep exact numbers; it can be 10 to 15), that’s 1.66 million fertilized embryos destroyed.

Trump wants your taxes to fund this.

— Gabriel Hughes (@Pastor_Gabe) August 30, 2024

Trump just announced his admin would either pay for IVF with tax dollars or force all insurance companies cover it

Only 7% of embryos created via IVF will result in a live birth, the remaining 93% are frozen indefinitely, miscarried, or aborted.

Over 1 million human embryos are…

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) August 29, 2024

The Trump initiative is expected to appeal not only to suburban centrists, but more Democratic-leaning voting groups, such as LGBT people who use IVF to conceive children.

“Affordable access to IVF is an important issue for the LGBT community across the political spectrum, and President Trump’s proposal would be a game changer for LGBT couples who want to start families of their own,” Log Cabin Republicans President Charles Moran said in a statement.

That’s apparently the core of it.

It’s about gays.

The science has done incredible things with vaccines and changing the weather using a system of windmills, but they have yet to conquer the challenge of anal babies.

Lauren Brown, 36, had two sons with her wife using IVF treatment.

Inspired in part by her experience and with the blessing of her family, she decided to look into becoming a surrogate, especially for another LGBTQ+ family like her own. https://t.co/OHME6KZtOr pic.twitter.com/DmM9KCMjNA

— Good Morning America (@GMA) June 29, 2024

I don’t really know that I have any new commentary on this issue. We’ve all seen the way that Kamala has become a hardcore border enforcer and Trump has become the mega-social-liberal.

He wants abortion and anal babies.

Technically, it’s now possible to be forced to be a father even if you’re still a virgin.

Let that sink in.

We’re going to hit an incel singularity, where we hit levels of sexual frustration that shouldn’t even be possible. Soon, men won’t even be able to safely be in the same room with a woman without fearing having their entire fortunes seized by greedy gold digging whores.

NBC News:

A divorced Arizona woman cannot use her frozen embryos when her ex-husband doesn’t want children with her, the state’s highest court ruled last week.

The ruling handed down Thursday relied on a contract signed by the couple before they were married that said if they broke up, they had to agree to have a baby or donate the unused embryos.

“I’ll never know what it feels like to be a mother,” Ruby Torres told Nightly News. “I never thought we would get to where we are today.”

Torres was diagnosed with cancer in 2014 while she was dating John Terrell. Before starting chemotherapy, Torres decided to undergo in vitro fertilization, or IVF, using donor sperm. Terrell, her boyfriend at the time, agreed to be the donor.

One month later, the couple signed a contract with a fertility clinic. The agreement said that any fertilized eggs would be considered joint property, and both parties would have to agree about what to do with them if the relationship ended.

That’s a perfectly reasonable agreement – after all, if the woman gets impregnated against the man’s will, he’ll still have to pay for that child’s everything forever.

You might be thinking “hol up, this story seems like everything ends well, right? The bitch lost her case.”

Actually, it’s not a perfect ending – she didn’t end up in jail.

Well, you’re wrong.

This case did indeed turn out in the man’s favor. However, things won’t go so well in the future…

Four days after signing the contract, Torres and Terrell married. They started IVF shortly afterward and produced seven viable embryos, according to court records.

Three years later, Terrell filed for divorce. Torres still hoped to become a mother, and asked to use the existing embryos since chemotherapy ruined her chances of getting pregnant again.

“She wanted to … force my client to become a father against his will,” Terrell’s lawyer, Eric Fraser, told NBC affiliate KPNX.

Under Arizona law, Terrell would still be financially responsible for the child even if the baby was born after he and Torres split, according to Fraser.

“He would be on the hook for child support for 18 years,” he said.

…

The case inspired an Arizona law passed in 2018 that would have given Torres the opportunity to use her embryos without Terrell’s consent. Because the statute is not retroactive, it does not apply to Torres.

That’s right.

The law’s been changed – in Arizona, at least.

Now if some skank wants to be fertilized in-vitro against your will, the law will side with her.

Your precious vital essence doesn’t belong to you – it belongs to the state, and thus to women.

Okay, I’m pretty sure you need to have created some fertilized eggs in advance for this law to take effect. They won’t just, uh, acquire your seed by force. For now.

However, from a biological standpoint, there is no difference between this and men being raped and robbed of their seed.

We’re only a few steps away from women having the right to forcefully seize your sperm to be fertilized in-vitro, and then you’ll be legally obliged to pay child support. Moreover, if the woman regrets the whole thing, she can get you convicted of rape even though you never even touched her. This is the future, White Man, where an incel virgin can also technically be a deadbeat dad and a rapist.

Better just stay indoors and keep playing vidya. The world is getting too scary.