All Moslems need to be sent back to the Middle East. No exceptions.

Europe is facing a major demographic crisis in the years to come. If blood and soil nationalism is not implemented, many European countries are going to be overrun with Moslem savages. This is assuming that existing trends remain intact.

A new study is stating that some European nations could see their Moslem population triple by 2050. This is largely because these Moslems breed like rats. This is obviously not a good situation.

Guardian:

The Muslim population in some European countries could triple by 2050 while it will barely change in others, according to new projections released by the Washington-based Pew Research Centre.

The report, Europe’s Growing Muslim Population, shows a stark west-east divide. The Muslim share of Germany’s population could grow from 6.1% in 2016 to 19.7% in 2050 if high migration continues, whereas over the border Poland’s share would change from 0.1% to 0.2% in the same scenario.

Even if all current 28 EU members, plus Norway and Switzerland, closed their borders to migrants, the Muslim population share in the west would continue to grow owing to a younger age profile and higher fertility rates, but remain very low in the east.

It is no surprise that Western European countries will be the most impacted by what’s going on. They’re the ones who have been letting these third world hordes enter in massive numbers. Some like Germany are even encouraging them to migrate by promising them free stuff.

In places like Sweden, the police use their full resources to attack and harass Swedish nationalist groups while letting Moslems run amok. It is a totally insane situation.

Look what happened a few days ago when some nationalists simply tried to give fliers to people.

At least Eastern European countries are filled with Moslem hating Slavs. They are not accommodating these Molsem invaders and this is why there are few if any Moslems in these countries. The nations that existed behind the iron curtain during the Cold War seem to have been the most resistant to this madness. Variants of nationalism and populism are currently ruling the politics of these countries.

It’s going to be an uphill battle in Western Europe though. Ultimately it is probably going to come down to rounding up these savages and putting them in concentration camps. Some might leave voluntarily but many will not. Either way, they all have to go one way or another.

Bill Clinton appears to have completely lost the plot. Nothing he has said during this election cycle has been beneficial to his wife.

Breitbart:

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump blasted Bill Clinton’s suggestion that the United States use Syrian refugees to rebuild Detroit.

The populist billionaire denounced Clinton’s suggested proposal as “crazy” and “unfair” to American workers who are already living there and are in need of good-paying jobs.

“It’s very unfair to the people that are living there. I think it’s crazy,” Trump told Breitbart on Thursday. “I mean, these people are getting started—I think it’s a very, very hard place to get your start.”

“We shouldn’t have them [i.e. Syrian refugees] in the country,” Trump added. “We don’t know who these people are. We have no idea. This could be the all time great Trojan horse. We have no idea who they are. The whole thing is ridiculous. Number one: we should build safe zones over in Syria, that’s what we should have, and we should have the Gulf states fund them. It’s just crazy. We ought to be building safe zones in Syria and not taking these people in– whether it’s Detroit or anywhere else.”

…Clinton’s suggestion that the U.S. ought to give Detroit jobs to foreign refugees came during a February discussion at the Clinton Global Initiative with Chobani billionaire and mass migration enthusiast, Hamdi Ulukaya.

“A spoonful of yogurt helps the GANG RAPE go down, kaffir.”

“The truth is that the big loser in this over the long run is going to be Syria. This [i.e. the Syrian migrant crisis] is an enormous opportunity for Americans,” Clinton said in February.  “Detroit has 10,000 empty, structurally sound houses —10,000. And lot of jobs are to be had repairing those houses. Detroit just came out of bankruptcy and the mayor’s trying to do an innovative sort of urban homesteading program there. But it just gives you an example of what could be done. And I think any of us who have ever had any personal experience with either Syrian Americans or Syrian refugees think it’s a pretty good deal.”

“Experience with Syrian refugees”

During the discussion, Clinton praised Ulukaya for his efforts to fill his yogurt plants with imported foreign refugees. Ulukaya suggested that the U.S. ought to be taking in more refugees and said that he was “proud” of Turkey’s decision to accept 2 million Syrian refugees.

Ulukaya told Clinton that Syrian refugees “bring flavors to the community just like in… Twin Falls, [Idaho]” where Ulukaya’s yogurt factory is based.

Clinton’s controversial suggestion that U.S. give Detroit jobs to imported foreign refugees has received virtually no media coverage outside of Breitbart News.

Because, as Trump says, it’s crazy.

This isn’t the type of thing Hillary wants right now. This is as bad as when he threatened Hungary.

Either Bill has lost his mind or he’s trying to sabotage her campaign on purpose.

Mental wounds not healing. Life’s a bitter shame. I’m goin’ off the rails on a crazy train.

Well, Merkel’s broken.

We broke the stupid bitch, guys.

She is now having to publicly confirm that she isn’t attempting to commit a genocide against the German people.

Major win.

How long ago was it that “Merkel is purposefully attempting to destroy Germany” would have been dismissed by everyone as a kooky conspiracy theory?

Now she has to say “Germany will remain Germany.”

Excellent.

The Local:

One year after Angela Merkel first declared “we can do this,” leading to a huge uptick in refugees applying for asylum, the Chancellor reflected this week on her policies and the future of Germany.

In an interview with Süddeutsche Zeitung published online on Tuesday, Merkel seemed as resolute as ever about the decision to take in hundreds of thousands of refugees from war-torn countries.

When she first uttered her now often repeated – and mocked – mantra of “we can do this” one year ago, she said she never expected those few words to make such an impact.

“If you asked me before if I would introduce a distinctive phrase that would be quoted many times over, I would not have thought of this phrase.”

Haha.

Poor dumb old hag. She never even meant to say that slogan.

Btw, I once wrote a funny article about other slogans she could consider switching to.

At the same time, she said that she used the phrase with “deep conviction… and with the awareness that we were dealing with a difficult and big task.” Merkel said that it was clear there were many hurdles and fears that she needed to dismantle.

…

Merkel has also recently faced a drop in approval ratings following several violent attacks in July that involved perpetrators who had sought asylum in Germany. In Würzburg, a 17-year-old Afghan refugee attacked a family on a train with an axe. Within the same week, a Syrian man blew himself up in Ansbach, injuring a dozen others.

German media later reported that both had been in contact with members of Isis.

The Chancellor said that it was “completely understandable” that there has been “unease and concern” following the attacks.

She said it showed that, among refugees there are some who did not arrive with pure intentions. This makes integration a huge challenge, she added.

Which ones arrived with “pure intentions” though?

You said they were going to get jobs in the high-tech field and pay the pensions of old Whites. But they can’t even read or write in their own languages.

Is coming to live on welfare a “pure intension”?

But she also continued to reject the notion that there was a direct connection between terrorism and having so many refugees in the country.

“It is simply false that terrorism only first came here through refugees. It was already here, especially with the suspected terrorists that we have been monitoring.”

But the people who committed the attacks weren’t already there.

So what does that even mean?

Like, there is a spirit of terrorism that resides in Germany and these people coming in just got overtaken by this spirit?

Why does everything have to get metaphysical all the time? Can’t we just discuss facts and realities?

She maintained as well that the hundreds of thousands of refugees remaining in Germany would not change the character of the country.

“Germany will remain Germany, with all that we love and hold dear.”

The country has always undergone change since its inception, Merkel said, but she would not let Germany lose the values and principles that make it attractive.

“These are reflected in our liberality, our democracy, our constitutional state, and in our overwhelming commitment to a social market economy, through which our economic strength can absorb those who are weakest.”

How will the country remain the same with a different population?

This is like taking a beautiful fish tank and filling it up with leeches and saying “it will remain the beautiful fish tank we love and hold dear.”

No one is going to sit and marvel at a tank filled with leeches.

And no one is going to enjoy a country filled with Moslems. Unless it’s like Morocco and people go there to smoke hash. And it won’t be like that.

Exclusive to the New Observer from Real Facts Media. Last weekend German patriots from Identitäre Bewegung braved the bad weather to hold public information rallies in over 40 cities throughout Germany.

The basic strategy was to prominently display the Identitäre Bewegung banner in high-traffic areas while handing out information flyers to passerby. Different locations included prominent shopping areas and city centers.

Patriots in Dresden.

Rather than trying to hold a large rally, organizers opted for small teams that could target different locations throughout Germany for maximum impact. In one German city, the group managed to hit four locations, from department stores to the city center.

While Identitäre Bewegung is not as strong in Germany as other countries, such as France and Austria, it is quickly growing with lots of interest.

Due to the prevalent “Antifa” presence, which likes to disrupt and attack patriots in Germany, the details of the event were largely secret.

The “Antifa” groups have a long history of agitating and violently confronting anyone opposing the continued invasion of Germany by Third Worlders. This was especially apparent during the last state election cycle in March.

It is also interesting to note the cultural differences between East (former DDR) and West Germany.

For example, a Dresden PEGIDA rally will get thousands of people marching through the streets. But an attempted PEGIDA rally in Stuttgart or Mannheim would likely see only a few PEGIDA supporters and hundreds of Antifa. Nonetheless, that did not stop German patriots last weekend.

Given the German media’s blatant bias and disdain for people opposing the invasion, the strategy was a successful way to get the message directly to the people.

The average German’s trust in the media is very low right now, especially after the Cologne attacks on New Year’s Eve. Hence, it is a good time to be spreading this message and bypassing traditional media altogether.

Patriots throughout the West can utilize this basic strategy. It only takes a few people to hit the streets and broadcast the message. With a small group of four people, two could hold up a banner and two could pass out information flyers.

You could follow this strategy anywhere, from a little village in England to the streets of New York. As trust in the political establishment falls, the opportunity to recruit others into our ranks grows. The time is now.

The Jews are behind immigration.

But why, you ask? How does it benefit them?

Especially with Moslem “refugees” who ostensibly want to murder them all?

The Jews, you see, are themselves an alien force. If they are the sole alien force, it is very easy for the people of their host nation to identify them as an alien force. If, however, there are multiple different alien groups within a society, chaos is created, and people are no longer capable of identifying the Jew as an alien, or even opposing the concept of aliens feeding on the society.

As such, the support of mass immigration by Jews is a self-protection mechanism, designed to mask their presence in our societies.

Mark Hetfield, president and CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), writes for JNS:

The Torah reiterates, no less than 36 times, versions of the commandment to love the stranger as ourselves, for we know the heart of a stranger, as we were once strangers in the land of Egypt. The Exodus narrative is not just about the suffering and flight of the Jews, but it delivers a universal message about Jewish commitment to human rights and refugee protection.

HIAS was established 135 years ago to protect refugees — Jewish ones — who were fleeing the pogroms of Czarist Russia. HIAS, which always refers to itself as the “global Jewish non-profit that protects refugees,” is not searching for a new mission. We remain true to the original one of refugee protection. What HIAS has done is moved from its “Exodus” period of our first 120 years, in which HIAS focused on bringing Jews from oppression to freedom, to our “Leviticus” period, in which we fulfill Jewish values and assist refugees of all faiths and ethnicities based on our own Exodus experiences.

The changes to HIAS’s work are not just theologically motivated. They are based on the lessons of history, especially from the Holocaust period when HIAS, the Jewish community, and the world failed to protect the 6 million Jews who perished. The evolution of HIAS is about fulfilling our community’s promise that never again will we permit anything like the Holocaust to happen. What is the most effective strategy for doing this? By acting only when Jewish refugees are in danger, or by constantly advocating for the universal protection of all refugees? HIAS has chosen the latter path.

One reason we failed during the Shoah was that, at that time, the world had no internationally recognized right to flee and seek refuge. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Refugee Convention of 1951 and its 1967 Protocol — heavily advocated by the Jewish community, Israel and HIAS — now provide us with the principles to help ensure that never again will refugees be pushed back into the hands of their persecutors.

We cannot protect ourselves by being only for ourselves. We can only protect ourselves by protecting and implementing universal principles of human rights.

And there you have it: their purpose in supporting mass immigration is to protect themselves from being identified by the native population as a subversive and dangerous alien force.

An absolute majority of elementary school pupils in the Belgian city of Antwerp are nonwhite, according to figures released by the Belgian Minister of Education, Claude Marinowe.

Answering a parliamentary question from Vlaams Belang Member of Parliament, Filip Dewinter, Marinowe said that of the 12,300 children in elementary schools, some 6,451 were “followers of the Islamic religion.”

Antwerp Central Station.

Although it is illegal in Belgium to collect data based on race, the figures (as reported in the Gazet van Antwerpen newspaper), can be taken to mean that 52.4 percent of all elementary school pupils are of Arabic, north African, or Middle Eastern origin.

In contrast, only 18.7 percent of the children are Catholic, and some 26.4 percent Protestant, and thus more likely to be white.

According to the Gazet van Antwerpen, in the suburb of Kiel, just south of the city center, 83 percent of children are Muslims. In Antwerp-North, the figure is 64 percent, and in the suburb of Borgerhout, it stands at 63 percent.

The lowest numbers are in the northern suburb of Ekeren—where De Winter lives—where 14 percent of the school children are Muslim, and in Berendrecht, Zandvliet, and Lillo district (the three towns along the seaport docks north of the old city of Antwerp), where 15 percent of the school population are Muslim.

The Flora school in Bergerhout, Antwerp. Pictures from the school website.

The elementary school with the largest percentage of Muslim children is the Flora in Borgerhout, which has a 94 percent Muslim enrollment—and going by the pictures on its website, what appears to be close to a 100 percent nonwhite school body.

The Gazet van Antwerpen added that Muslims make up more than half of the student bodies in thirty-three of the fifty-eight urban elementary schools in the city. Each year this figure increases by 2 percent on average.

Given these statistics, it is inevitable that Antwerp will be a majority nonwhite city within the next ten years at most, unless all Third World immigration is halted and reversed.

Street scene in Borgerhout, Antwerp.

The influx of nonwhites into Belgium has been growing for a number of years through legal immigration channels, promoted and encouraged by successive conservative and socialist party governments.

The Vlaams Belang party is the only group which has consistently opposed mass Third World immigration. It was previously known as the Vlaams Blok, but had to reform into the Vlaams Belang in 2004 after the government had it banned for breaching “anti-racism” laws.

Beatrix von Storch, the whole internet salutes you.

The heroic female AfD Berlin Chief has bravely announced support for shooting invasive hajis attempting to cross the border, including women and children.

Spiegel:

The Berlin AFD Chief Beatrix von Storch finds it fundamentally correct to prevent women with children from crossing the border, by force of arms if necessary. On her Facebook page she affirmed the relevant question of a user. After a flood of critical comments she later explained: “I am fundamentally opposed to violence against children, which includes the use of firearms against migrant minors by the police.”

Storch, who is also deputy AfD national chairman and MEP, had made a statement on Saturday on her Facebook page regarding the controversial statements AfD national chairman Frauke Petry. This was in an interview with the “Mannheimer Morgen” the use of firearms at border controls required to prevent illegal border crossings.

One commenter asked von Storch from the network: “Will you support preventing women with children crossing the green field at gunpoint?” Storch answered simply “yes.”

It was obviously a trick question, bringing up the emotional issue of “women with children,” but it is nonetheless a fact that you either have a border or you do not. Women with children are not somehow allowed to break laws because they are women and children.

Presumably, the military wouldn’t need to fire on women and children, but if they did, they could easily shoot-out their kneecaps rather than go for the headshot.

Nobody likes thinking about shooting women and children. But there are a lot of things about reality no one likes thinking about, and the reality is that we have to defend ourselves.

We need to recognize that this is an invasion, meaning it is wartime, meaning that enemy combatants are enemy combatants regardless of age or sex.

I don’t have a whole lot of hope in AfD, generally, as they are just so soft. But these statements improve my faith.

Beatrix is of royal descent, and her maternal grandfather was Lutz Graf Schwerin von Krosigk, who served as German Finance Minister under Adolf Hitler. He was one of only two men to serve in Hitler’s cabinet for the entire 12 years of the Hitlerian age.

The High Court of Australia has rejected an attempt by a fake asylum seeker from Bangladesh to declare illegal that country’s offshore invader detention center policy.

“Human rights” lawyers acting for the invader—who has no claim to asylum under any law, local or international—said the fact that she had been allowed to temporarily enter Australia from an offshore detention center for medical treatment meant that she “deserved the full protection of the Australian constitution.”

Six of the seven High Court judges found against the Bangladeshi invader’s claim, and ordered her to pay the government’s costs. The judges found that the law under which the offshore policy was implemented and managed, was supported by the commonwealth’s constitutional power to make laws regarding “aliens.”

“The detention in custody of an alien, for the purpose of their removal from Australia, did not infringe … the Constitution because the authority, limited to that purpose, was neither punitive in character nor part of the judicial power of the Commonwealth,” Chief Justice Robert French co-wrote with justices Susan Kiefel and Geoffrey Nettle.

The ruling means that that Australian government has a legal right to operate the offshore detention centers on Nauru and Manus Island—a policy which halted the then lucrative people smuggler trade in bringing nonwhites from south Asia by boat to Australia to launch bogus asylum claims.

In reality, none of these “boat people” were fleeing any conflict, and were merely trying to get into Australia to parasite off that white-built society—and to get away from their self-created Second and Third World disaster zones.

Until the offshore detention policy was established—whereby the boats were intercepted at sea and the invaders placed in detention centers on Nauru, an island country in Micronesia in the Central Pacific—some 51,000 nonwhites arrived in Australia by sea, demanding to be let in, just as has happened in Europe along the Mediterranean coast.

The Australian government then issued an official and public warning that anyone who tried to enter Australia illegally (by boat or any other method) would not be allowed to settle there under any circumstances.

As soon as this policy was implemented, the nonwhite invasion stopped. Even the leftist opposition Labor Party had to admit that the policy had worked, even if, in their minds, it had only served to save the lives of illegal immigrants drowning at sea.

The invader detention center in Nauru.

The High Court’s decision has now made it nearly impossible to legally challenge this policy outside of parliament, and its announcement literally reduced the “human rights” lawyers to tears outside the court building.

A group of 267 invaders currently in Australia are now likely to be sent back to Nauru following the High Court ruling.

In the wake of the ruling, Richard Marles, the opposition immigration spokesman, said the government now needed “firmer third-country resettlement options to clear the backlog of asylum-seekers.”

Although the new Australian government appears to be struggling to find a final destination for the invaders in detention at Nauru, it remains a source of mystery why they are simply not sent back to their originating countries.

Presently, Europe is experiencing mass-protests against the “migrant” invasion, some of which have turned violent. On Wednesday, I reported that the Dutch government has responded by empowering police to shut down any and all protests with force.

I noted that this was hardly a move that Sun Tzu or Machiavelli would recommend, and is likely to lead to full-on rebellion against the government. I would here like to expand on that idea, and consider just how these two advisors would advise Merkel and the EU on their mass immigration project.

There is no historical analog for this present situation of a government forcibly flooding its own country with a foreign people who are hostile both to the native population and the government that is bringing them in, so it is hard to say how these men would advise that it be dealt with.

Having read both famous advisors, I will here try to imagine how they would respond.

They would advise European governments intent on “diversifying” Europe to make the Moslem men coming in into an elite class which controls the state apparatus including the police force, and allow them to force their values and culture on the native population through brutal shock-and-awe style violence. The brutal violence would then need to be counter-balanced with mass propaganda encouraging Islamic values and conversion to Islam.

European leaders would then be advised to silence and demonize any voice opposed to Islamic culture, while using Islamic charity systems to push the belief that Islam is the solution to all unrest. Of course, the children would also be brainwashed in schools, and turned against parents opposed to Islam. Anyone who converted to Islam would be given special rewards, anyone who refused to toe the line would be punished. This would include turning blind-eye to women who aren’t wearing Islamic garb getting raped.

The Problem

The problem here is that Merkel and the EU are unwilling to do what needs to be done to complete this project and fully Islamify Europe. The biggest part of the problem is that they don’t seem to necessarily want to Islamify Europe, but desire simply to destroy Europe and the European people. They continue to feebly assert liberal values which have no place within Islam.

Ultimately, however, they appear to care more about mass immigration than liberal values. They just have a schizophrenic-type inability to recognize that the only conceivable outcome of this mass immigration is an Islamic Europe, and recognize that the logical thing is to embrace it now, and force Islam on the European people.

They are also thus far unwilling to use severe violence on the White population, something which is going to be absolutely necessary. Water cannons and pepper-spray will not stop a rebellion. To prevent a rebellion, you need public massacres against the political opposition. If the German government wants to prevent a rebellion of ethnic Germans opposed to their ethnic cleansing, they are going to need to need to begin using live ammo on protesters. They must demonstrate a willingness to slaughter anyone opposed to the diversification agenda.

Women who report Islamic sex crimes against them should also be punished through public humiliation.

It should then be made illegal to report anything negative about Islam or the invading Moslems. While that is basically already the case, they need to begin executing journalists and Facebook users (or “disappearing” them to some type of horrible work camp). They must create a climate where people not only fear arrest for saying the wrong thing, but fear for their lives.

There must be a sense of inevitability, and an understanding that resistance is futile. The European people must be made to feel that the only release from a state of constant fear and abuse is to embrace Islam.

So What Then?

Merkel is presently failing to do what needs to be done. She is bringing in the Moslems, but then sending the mixed signal that they shouldn’t be allowed to gang-rape women as soon as the cover-up fails. While she condemns all of German history as evil, she continues to speak of a “German spirit,” which gives the impression Germans have a right to exist.

She won’t use extreme violence against the native population and while pushing the Arabic language heavily, she won’t institute Islamic law as state policy.

Her present strategy is not only empowering the native Germans she is attempting to eradicate, but is enraging the Islamic hordes she is replacing the Germans with.

Unless Merkel clamps down hard and forces Islam onto ethnic Germans, the only possible end to this is a massive race war. The police and government will become irrelevant, as two populations go to war on the streets.

And Whites will obviously win, meaning Merkel will have failed in her goal of destroying White Europe.