It’s not the niggers, folks.

We just need more money for them programs, frankly, folks.

Campus Reform:

A recent study suggests that, for the first time in nearly 100 years, Americans’ average intelligence quotient (IQ) is declining.

The professors who authored the study theorize that the quality of education could play a role in reversing the IQ gains enjoyed by previous generations.

The study, published in a spring 2023 edition of Intelligence, measures IQ test results among 18- to 60-year-olds to examine the phenomenon first observed by philosopher James Flynn.

Professors from Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill., and the University of Oregon in Eugene explain the Flynn effect: starting in 1932, average IQ scores increased roughly three to five points per decade. In other words, “younger generations are expected to have higher IQ scores than the previous cohort.”

Data from the sample of U.S. adults, however, imply that there is a reverse Flynn effect. From 2006 to 2018, the age groups measured generally saw declines in the IQ test used by the study, the International Cognitive Ability Resource (ICAR).

Overall declines held true across age groups after controlling for educational attainment and gender, but the study shows that the loss in cognitive abilities is steeper for younger participants. “[T]he greatest differences in annual scores were observed for 18- to 22-year-olds,” the authors write.

Hmm…

Exposure to education, including through obtaining a four-year degree, generally lessened the blow to IQ points. The study suggests, however, that this is less so for younger participants. “[E]xposure to education may only be protective for certain age groups,” according to the authors.

They continue to theorize that “a change of quality or content of education and test-taking skills” could explain the difference education makes in the IQ of younger versus older Americans.

There is some validity to “bad education makes people stupider,” and education in America is definitely getting much worse.

Also, black IQs can actually be raised. That happens, within reason.

I think the Flynn Effect is valid, in certain contexts, and for certain discussions. I do not totally dismiss this, and I don’t even think the most severe racists totally dismiss it.

But the drop of the IQ on this scale could only be the result of the demographics shift.

It’s a boomer sort of talking point at this point, but it’s true: everything about the American system in 2022 is straight out of George Orwell.

It’s really wacky that they are so aggressively just doing all these things that are listed in 1984, including aggressively altering the language.

Breitbart:

Terms and phrases such as “American,” “Karen,” “prisoner,” and even “hip hip hooray,” are “harmful” and should be replaced with more acceptable alternatives, according to Stanford University’s recently exposed index of words to be “eliminated” from use.

The California-based university’s listing of “potentially harmful terms,” originally published in May, drew significant attention this week after seeing widespread exposure on social media.

According to the initiative’s website, the goal of the “multi-phase, multi-year project to address harmful language in IT at Stanford” is to strive to eliminate the “many forms of harmful language, including racist, violent, and biased (e.g., disability bias, ethnic bias, ethnic slurs, gender bias, implicit bias, sexual bias) language in Stanford websites and code.”

It also calls to avoid terms that derive from “colonialism.”

“We encourage you to evaluate the language you use and make changes where you can,” it continues.

The stated purpose of the site, which “focuses on potentially harmful terms” used in the U.S., is “to educate people about the possible impact of the words we use.”

The list of “harmful” terms to be “eliminated” appear in ten distinct categories.

Ableist

Under the “ableist” category of “harmful terms” which further the “belief that people who live with disabilities are abnormal,” Stanford recommends to “consider using” alternatives such as “person with a substance use disorder” instead of “addict,” “masked study” instead of “blind study,” “died by suicide” instead of “committed suicide,” “detail-oriented” instead of “OCD,” and “quick meeting” instead of “stand up meeting.”

Ageist

Under the “ageist” category of language which “singles out a person based on their age instead of their qualifications,” the Stanford list suggests using the person’s name instead of “gray beard,” and “person suffering from senility” instead of the term “senile.”

Culturally Appropriative

“Culturally appropriative” language that “misuses terms that hold meaning to a particular culture in a way that often lacks respect or appreciation” is also to be avoided.

The guide calls to completely desist from the noun “Brave” because it “perpetuates the stereotype of the ‘noble courageous savage,’ equating the Indigenous male as being less than a man.”

Other “offensive” terms and phrases to be avoided include: “bury the hatchet,” “chief,” “guru,” and even “tribe.”

Gender-Based

“Gender-based” terms, which are deemed “not helpful, and, in many cases, are exclusionary,” include the woke “‘preferred’ pronouns” instead of just “pronouns,” given that adding “preferred” implies that “non-binary gender identity is a choice and a preference.”

Words that reinforce “male-dominated language” include “mankind” which should be replaced with “people, humankind, [or] human beings;” “manmade” which should be replaced with “made by hand;” and “manpower,” to be replaced with terms such as “workforce” or “personnel resources.”

Even the term “seminal,” which refers to something that strongly influences later developments, is considered a reinforcement of “male-dominated language” and should be replaced with “leading” or “groundbreaking” instead.

Imprecise

Terms deemed “imprecise” include: “abort,” which “can unintentionally raise religious/moral concerns over abortion;” and even the use of “American” instead of “U.S. citizen” is deemed offensive in that it insinuates that the United States is “the most important country in the Americas (which is actually made up of 42 countries).”

The term “Hispanic” has roots that “lie in Spain’s colonization of South American countries” and is to be avoided as well.

Interestingly, the guide suggests that the term “Karen” is harmful and should be replaced with the apparently less offensive “demanding or entitled White woman” instead.

The term “oriental” is seen as “pejorative as it racializes people of Asian descent as forever opposite ‘others,’” while “peanut gallery” should also be avoided as it “refers to the cheapest and worst section in theaters where many Black people sat during the Vaudeville era.”

While the term “straight,” as opposed to “heterosexual,” implies that non-heterosexuals are “bent” or not “normal,” the guide also condemns use of the term “thug” instead of “suspect” or “criminal,” because it tends to take on a “racist connotation when used in certain circles.”

Institutionalized Racism

Terms deemed to be forms of “institutionalized racism,” include: “blacklist,” which “assigns negative connotations to the color black, racializing the term,” as well as “brown bag,” and “red team,” due to the fact that “red” is often “used disparagingly to refer to Indigenous peoples.”

The term “whitespace” also appears on the list, for it apparently assigns “value connotations based on color (white = good), an act which is subconsciously racialized.”

Person-First

Examples of “offensive” terms in the “person-first” category, which help to avoid defining people “by just one of their characteristics,” include the use of “convict” instead of “person who is/was incarcerated;” “homeless person” instead of “person without housing;” “immigrant” instead of “person who has immigrated” or “non-citizen;” or “prisoner” instead of “person who is/was incarcerated.”

Violence-themed

The guide also recommends “using non-violent alternatives” to violent language “whenever possible.”

The term “abusive relationship” should be discarded in favor of “relationship with an abusive person” in order to communicate that a person is committing the abuse and not the relationship.

Even the age-old universal idiom, “kill(ing) two birds with one stone,” which implies the accomplishment of two things at once, is deemed an apparent “expression [that] normalizes violence against animals,” as does the expression that there is “more than one way to skin a cat.”

In addition, the expressions to “take a shot at” something or to “take your best shot at” something, also “represent the unnecessary use of the imagery of hurting someone or something.”

Other Terms

Other terms blacklisted by the guide include the common cheer “hip hip hooray,” which Stanford claims “was used by German citizens during the Holocaust as a rallying cry when they would hunt down Jewish citizens living in segregated neighborhoods,” though the cheer originated long before the rise of the Nazi movement; as well as the phrase to “hold down the fort,” because it “stems from settlers and soldiers resisting ‘savages’ when ‘on the warpath.’”

In addition, the guide lists “long time no see” and “no can do” as offensive terms due to the fact that they “originated from stereotypes that mocked non-native English speakers.”

After being publicized this week on social media, the index of taboo terms and phrases was met with outrage and mockery.

“I remember how proud I was when I became a naturalized American citizen. I’m still proud to be an American, and I don’t care that @Stanford disapproves of my using the term,” wrote Stanford University Professor of Medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“Stanford disapproves of saying you’re proud to be an American? Whoa,” replied Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

Stanford disapproves of saying you’re proud to be an American? Whoa.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 20, 2022

The radical left is attempting to destroy our country and erase our history.

Now, Stanford University is seeking to ban the word “American.”

— Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) December 20, 2022

https://twitter.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1605029838963761152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1605029838963761152%7Ctwgr%5Ec72651ea907cc5f774b21e8338479d7fb718d7bd%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2022%2F12%2F20%2Fstanford-university-ripped-guide-eliminate-harmful-language-like-american-karen-prisoner%2F

You guys, this list of words that Stanford doesn't want us to use anymore is truly insane. https://t.co/mUMGgSSUAr pic.twitter.com/A7DtfpjIUv

— Justine Moore (@venturetwins) December 18, 2022

“The academy is beyond saving,” wrote another.

“You thought they were banning just ‘Confederates?’ Nope. Stanford’s new list of naughty words includes ‘American,’” another user wrote.

“American” is a very strange one to ban.

But it is really an obsolete term.

“America” doesn’t even exist anymore. What we have is Analmerica: land of the tranny and home of the child molester.

Woke University Bans 'Offensive' Terms Including 'Manpower', 'Able-Bodied', 'Baby Boomer' https://t.co/1S6UJ5O412

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) July 10, 2022

People fought and died for freedoms, and people now are giving them away for free.

They’re demanding they be taken from them.

And somehow, the jockstrap ones aren’t even the ugliest clothes in the show

Breitbart:

New York Fashion Week has debuted an item that salutes the imperative form must follow function in the age of coronavirus: say hello to the jockstrap mask.

A model wore the distinctive piece of apparel Monday as he sashayed down the runway at the week-long event that finished Wednesday.

The novel creation featuring a breathe-through jockstrap mask came from the Dion Lee Fall/Winter 2022 show.

Lest anyone think there was only one color available, a second turn was taken with a model wearing a white jockstrap with appropriately match clothing.

Women were not left out in the pursuit to match clothing with a desire to shield the wearer from the perils of coronavirus.

This is not the first time fashion leaders have tried to add a personal piece of clothing to their face in the interests of warding off infection.

At the start of the pandemic back in 2020 the DIY coronavirus mask made its first debut out of a gym bag.

TV personality Emerson Collins posted a TikTok demonstrating his no-sew mask.

“I made a Jockstrap Mask Tutorial because I’m ridiculous,” the actor said in a tweet sharing the video.

In the clip, Collins demonstrates a simple, three-step method for securing the protective gear to cover the nose and mouth. He then models a variety of looks using the method, showcasing his varied collection.

You’re not ridiculous, sir.

Yes you are.

But you are a minor ridiculousness.

I made a Jockstrap Mask Tutorial, because I’m ridiculous. pic.twitter.com/JiYhV3K8uh

— Emerson Collins (@ActuallyEmerson) April 3, 2020

The only threat is that this will increase crime even worse.

I’ll bet you thought this title was a clever racist reference to black people.

But no, it’s actual apes.

Which honestly, are more deserving of rights than black people. No group of apes ever burned down a city.

RT:

On Sunday, residents in the northern Swiss region of Basel-Stadt will take to the polls to decide whether non-human anthropoids should enjoy the same basic rights as their human cousins.

The vote has been instigated by campaign group Sentience under Switzerland’s direct democracy system after amassing more than 100,000 signatures.

The country’s supreme court gave it the go-ahead after cantonal and city governments claimed the vote would violate federal law.

Sentience, which launched the campaign in 2016, said it was “thrilled at this historic decision,” after the supreme court threw out the regional government’s objections.

Behind every gibberish you’ve ever heard, there’s a Jew selling some books

Basel-Stadt’s residents will vote on whether to give primates the right to life, as well as the right to “mental and physical integrity.”

“This will mark the first time worldwide that people can vote on fundamental rights for non-human animals,” the group claims.

The group says that all primates are highly intelligent and experience human-like feelings and emotions, such as pain, grief, and compassion. It adds that they also maintain an active social life.

“Non-human primates have a fundamental interest in their life and physical and mental integrity,” Sentience stated, adding: “However, this is hardly taken into account by the Swiss animal welfare legislation.”

Hopefully, stuff like this eventually leads to giving literally every animal in the world the right to vote, including insects.

What difference would it make at this point?

Have you seen Idiocracy?

It’s a comedy about an average white man who, having taken part in a secret government experiment into hibernation, awakens 500 years later to an America in which everyone is stupid, most people are mixed race, and the president is a demented moon cricket. That last part proved particularly prescient, since the film was released in 2006 – a good year before Bathhouse Barry minced onto the world stage.

Since then, we’ve watched in horror as the “fictional” world of Idiocracy manifested before our eyes in every white nation of geopolitical importance.

The host of this month’s “straight out of Idiocracy” event is the English city of Sheffield, whose Somali refugee Lord Mayor (no, really) just came out and “banned” President Trump from “his” city. Here’s a photo from his recent anti-Trump speech, which gives new meaning to the term “one of these things is not like the others”:

Yes, that’s a sombrero resting atop his lightbulb-shaped skull.

He hates that Trump is being mean to Mexicans, you see.

Newshub:

The popular Lord Mayor of an English city has banned Donald Trump ahead of the US President’s visit to the UK on July 13.

Magid Magid, 28, has attracted significant media attention as the youngest Lord Mayor of Sheffield, a city in South Yorkshire, the first to come from the Green Party, and the first Somali to hold the position.

He moved from Somalia to Yorkshire when he was five in 1994 after the Somali Civil War broke out.

…

As a migrant, Mr Magid has delivered sharp criticism of Donald Trump and his views on immigration. He said on Twitter that Mr Trump is banned from coming to Sheffield during his visit to the UK next week.

I Magid Magid, Lord Mayor & first citizen of this city hereby declare that not only is Donald J Trump (@realDonaldTrump) a WASTEMAN, but he is also henceforth banned from the great city of Sheffield!

I further declare July 13th to be Mexico Solidarity Day! 🇲🇽 pic.twitter.com/qYehdHYDEt

— 🚀MΛG!D (@MagicMagid) July 4, 2018

It is unlikely Mr Trump would visit Sheffield during this visit, but Mr Magid says he wants to show solidarity with the Mexican community in the city, in light of the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance policy” towards undocumented immigrants – many who come from Mexico.

How predictable. The moment white people give a colored gentleman a position of influence, he immediately wages war against them by aligning with non-white interlopers on another continent. It’s almost like these darkies are subconsciously united by their inferiority complexes and want to reshape the global caste system in their favor.

In Mr Magid’s inaugural speech when he became Lord Mayor, he said: ‘I hope by the fact I am a black, Muslim immigrant – everything the Daily Mail probably hates – people will look and say, “In Sheffield we’re proud of doing things differently and celebrating our differences”.’

>we’re

Magid was born in Somalia and moved to Britain at the age of five. He’s not British even according to the treasonous “you’re British if you were born in the UK” law, yet he still thinks he can speak on behalf of Sheffield’s 80% white population.

What an uppity nigger.

Fortunately, Lord Mayor is a ceremonial position, meaning that Mr. Horn of Africa has no real power over anyone, least of all the GOD EMPEROR. He’s pretty much the definition of a pet negro; someone whom the white councilors of Sheffield can point to as proof that they’re not racist while they keep the city operational in the background.

Of course, Magid is too dumb to realize he’s nothing more than a walking diversity checkbox to these people.

The son of a Scotswoman, Trump has far more claim to British citizenship than Magid Magid ever had.

Only a psychotic Jew faggot would be crazy enough to grab President Camacho’s dick.

The Hollywood kike Harvey Weinstein has been accused of rape, sexual assault, jerking off in front of women and engaging in all sorts of disgusting perversions. The avalanche of accusations have come from numerous high profile Hollywood actresses including Angelina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow. This story has put an enormous spotlight on some of the horrible behind the scenes stuff that occurs within the degenerate Jew run film industry.

Weinstein’s behavior is only a small part of the depravity that exists in Hollywood. The child actors Corey Haim and Corey Feldman were sexually abused in the 1980s. There’s also the kike film directors Woody Allen and Roman Polanski who sexually abused minors. Women and children have been victimized by all sorts of perverted Hollywood kikes. This type of thing has been rampant in the industry for many years.

Now we have this bizarre story to add to the list.

In light of the Weinstein scandal, Terry Crews has come out claiming that a top Hollywood executive randomly grabbed his dick. Since nearly every top Hollywood executive is a Jew, the chances are high that he was the victim of a sexual assault by a perverted kike faggot. The story certainly fits in with kike behavior.

Page Six:

In the wake of many female stars and employees coming forward about Harvey Weinstein’s alleged sexual harassment and assault, actor Terry Crews has a story of his own experience with sexual assault in Hollywood.

The “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” star, 49, shared his story on social media because he wanted to let his followers know that Weinstein “is not the only perpetrator.”

“This whole thing with Harvey Weinstein is giving me PTSD. Why? Because this kind of thing happened to ME…” Crews tweeted Tuesday. “My wife n I were at a Hollywood function last year n a high level Hollywood executive came over 2 me and groped my privates.”

Crews continued, “Jumping back I said What are you doing?! My wife saw everything n we looked at him like he was crazy. He just grinned like a jerk.”

The “Expendables” star said he didn’t “kick his ass” because he thought of how the media would spin the story.

Crews is best known for playing the role of President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho in Mike Judge’s 2005 film Idiocracy. Visualizing some creepy homosexual Jew going up to President Camacho and grabbing his dick area is a very weird and creepy thought. President Camacho did not deserve this. He is a victim and deserves justice.

The fact that we are even talking about such a story is proof that Jew run Hollywood needs to be permanently gassed. The Department of Justice needs to launch an investigation into the industry. There’s a documented history and all sorts of anecdotal reports of these Hollywood kikes engaging in unethical and illegal activities. It’s time to bring the whole thing down.

Have we reached full Idiocracy yet? I’ve watched that movie a lot of times because I figured it might come in handy one day, but it feels like we still aren’t there yet… Or maybe I’m just too stupid myself to realize it?

The College Fix:

 Entering onto a campus full of strangers, concerns about making friends and the desire to feel accepted among peers can often be stressful factors. Recognizing this, universities across America have implemented a unique solution: ball pits.

This fall, campus leaders are welcoming students back to school with these colorful play pools. The pits are used as ice breakers, to break down racial barriers, facilitate lessons on wellness, and as part of freshmen orientation, according to many online campus calendars.

I imagine the first time this happened, it was because some university employee had a brother/uncle/cousin who sold these things, and then figured since everybody around is even dumber than he is, that he might make some cash off of it. So he probably gave the rest of the staff some irrefutable selling point (“It’ll combat racism,” “It’ll annoy Trump,” “I lost 69 relatives at Auschwitz,” etc.) and BOOM! PROFIT!

But this is happening at a lot of universities, not just one. So what’s the explanation? Does everybody in America have a relative that sells this crap?

Containers, such as inflatable swimming pools, are filled with small plastic balls labeled with different topics and questions. Students are then encouraged to enter into the tubs together to discuss.

Students learn more about each other by delving into deeper levels of conversation in the pits, facilitators told The College Fix in interviews. From icebreakers to controversial subjects, coordinators said they strive to create a safe space where students can hold and respect conflicting points of view.

I vaguely recall doing something similar to this in kindergarten. But I don’t think it cost 50K$ a year to do it.

Students who are triggered by the heteronormative implications of balls can do the Panda Neko dance instead

“The ball pits were perfect for allowing students to feel comfortable,” said Kate Ayotte, a wellness programs administrator at Central Connecticut State University in an email.

The school recently hosted a “Strangers in a Ball Pit” event (pictured) as part of its Welcome Week. At Central, it helped students learn more about maintaining their sanity throughout college life.

“That was the greatest benefit for helping them have conversations with other students they didn’t know and talk about mental health. They were so relaxed and just hanging out in the pools,” Ayotte said.

“A wellness programs administrator” – So not only do they have a useless made up job over there, but if my understanding of the English language is correct – they have more than one person doing it!

Likewise, Saint Mary’s College is scheduled to use a ball pit during its upcoming Mental Health Awareness Carnival.

What? Carnival? What?

“Students pick up a ball with a prompt and talk to their partner in the ball pit about their response. The balls start conversations between students and help them get to know one another on a slightly deeper level,” said Dr. Cynthia Cutshall, staff psychologist and outreach coordinator at Saint Mary’s College’s Counseling and Psychological Services, in an email.

“Students enjoy the activity, and it helps them talk to one another in real life, instead of over social media,” she said.

Can’t you just tell them to talk to each other without turning the whole place into a nuthouse?

Brady Ruffin with the Student Activities Association at the University of Mississippi said these events generate friendships and memories, noting the selfies and conversations seem memorable. At Ole Miss, its “Ball-Pit with Strangers” event late last month aimed to help foster inclusion, according to the university’s website.

“We write some questions on the bigger balls that we have that facilitate conversations,” said Ruffin, citing examples such as “What’s your favorite spot on campus?” or “What’s the best place to eat on campus?”

“Questions like these that spark conversation, especially on the topic of campus and Ole Miss,” Ruffin said. “It’s incredibly fun and people love it when it comes out.”

“People” seem to be getting dumber each passing day…

Facilitators told The Fix that the downside to the ball pits include that they’re not always easy to set up and don’t always attract many students. Another issue cited by Ayotte is that of making sure the conversations are healthy.

“One of the down sides as an administrator was not being able to have a way to monitor or observe the conversations too closely,” she said.

OMG, they can’t check to make sure the idiots they don’t discuss anything politically incorrect while lounging in plastic balls! I think I might have to change my opinion on this. All of a sudden, the college ball pits sound like ripe breeding grounds for fascism!

In addition to the pits at St. Mary’s, Ole Miss and Central Connecticut State, schools such as Northwestern State University, the University of Delaware and other campuses have hosted pits in recent weeks.

The ball pit trend on college seemed to gain ground during the last school year, when such events were billed as an effort to provide emotional safety. This year, campus officials have endeavored to present them as icebreakers and opportunities to make friends.

The takeaway from this is that, if you’re going to college anywhere in the Anglo world, you’re probably a fucking retard. And even if you aren’t retarded, you’re still wasting money that could be spent in a better way, ideally by buying guns, ammo and canned food for the coming collapse of society, when idiot zombies like these will come out of the ball pits and start eating the brains of people who still have them because they were smart enough to not go to college.

The type of shit you’ll be spending a small fortune to (((learn)))

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. This is what the leader of the dysgenic future of America will most likely look like.

One of the rare examples of a Hollywood movie that is genuinely good and actually has a powerful, positive message that touches on an important social issue is the 2006 movie Idiocracy, written and directed by the brilliant satirist Mike Judge of Beavis and Butthead, Office Space, and King of the Hill fame.

The plot is that two people volunteer to be cryogenically frozen in a military hibernation experiment, and the experiment goes wrong, causing them to not be released until well into the future, in 2505. The future is populated by a coffee-colored mass of, well, idiots, due to hundreds of years of dysgenic down-breeding.

Below is the first two minutes of the movie, which shows a hilarious contrast between an intelligent couple that keeps putting off having children until it’s too late, and a White trash moron who impregnates women left and right and pops out dozens of them. It begins with the following voice-over narration:

As the twenty-first century began, human evolution was at a turning point. Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest, the fastest reproduced in greater numbers than the rest, a process which had once favored the noblest traits of man, now began to favor different traits.

Most science fiction of the day predicted a future that was more civilized and more intelligent. But as time went on, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction — a dumbing down. How did this happen? Evolution does not necessarily reward intelligence. With no natural predators to thin the herd, it began to simply reward those who reproduced the most and left the intelligent to become an endangered species.

That is, basically, the traditional argument for eugenics, originally derived from Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection by Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton. Whether Judge was versed in the theory of eugenics when he wrote the movie, or whether he had just happened to independently come to the same conclusion as the eugenicists through observing current trends in society, is hard to tell.

If he was aware of eugenics, and the content of the movie suggests that as a good possibility, he must’ve either not been aware of the stigma associated with eugenics, which has become a dirty word in our current world due to the association it has with the so-called Jewish Holocaust, or unaware of the extent of that stigma, or else he just didn’t care.

Eugenics is a dirty word because the Third Reich practiced eugenics, and it led to the mass extermination of millions of Jews and other “undesirables,” so the story goes. This association was cemented into the mind of the public following the highly organized Jewish campaign for promoting the Holocaust in 1967, primarily as a deterrent to anti-Jewish sentiment following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. John Glad, in his book Jewish Eugenics, explains how

Subsequent to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the Holocaust Memorial Movement is launched, with eugenics targeted as the ideology of genocide. So effective is the campaign that polls show that many more Americans can identify the Holocaust than Pearl Harbor or the atomic bombing of Japan. Those who are familiar with the term “eugenics” begin to associate it with “Holocaust” and “racism.”

Glad could hardly be called an anti-Semite, as he is a Jew himself. Ideologically he is pro-eugenics and a universalist, rather than ethnocentric, and, in that eye-opening, thoroughly researched book of his he puts the blame for the suppression of eugenics – in great detail – squarely on his fellow Jews, who have themselves, he writes, “practiced eugenics for millennia.” This is a fact. Eugenics are actually embedded in Talmudic, Jewish religious law. (For more on this see A People That Shall Dwell Alone by Dr. Kevin MacDonald. Also see here and here)

So I guess it should come as no surprise to find out that the Jews in Hollywood did all they could to suppress Idiocracy, to the point where it almost didn’t even get released theatrically, and, when it did, there was virtually no promotion – no trailers, ads, etc. – and it was to a very limited amount of theaters.

Mike Judge spoke to VICE about this controversy in a video interview in 2013. Beginning at around 8:40 he says:

But Idiocracy though, that was, like, really ditching a movie, I mean they, I think it was like maybe 11 theaters they put it in. We locked, finished the movie, put it in the can and it was over a year after that that it came out, so I, by the time they got around to marketing, I was completely out of touch with them.

The Myth of Equality

Idiocracy also inherently challenges another sacred cow of Hollywood propaganda: the myth of equality. The movie puts a strong emphasis on the importance of IQ differences and their relation to biological inheritance. A taboo topic, to be sure. Because, as we know, everyone – Blacks and Whites, men and women, rich and poor – must always be considered exactly equal to everybody else, without exception. Any suggestion to the contrary, no matter how scientifically or logically sound, is simply unfit for polite society. Yet Judge courageously smashes through this silly myth by the deployment of unflinching satire – the most powerful weapon of all in combating the lies of the left – with devastating effectiveness.

If anyone hasn’t seen the movie, I recommend doing so. I can almost guarantee you will like it, as it is very witty and funny (though it may be a bit too silly and over-the-top for some, depending on your taste). The entire movie is on YouTube here.

Eugenics and Conspiracy Theories

Ironically, Judge was also interviewed by the pro-Jew, anti-eugenics conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and they also touched on this topic.

Beginning at 27:40:

Conspiracy types use the word “eugenics” to refer to their theory of a secret plan by Satan-worshipping Nazis that want to depopulate 90% of the earth, using poisonous airplane exhaust and other super secret evil methods. This issue has been dealt with already, so I will not rehash the arguments against it, but needless to say it is utter nonsense.

Their conspiratorial version of eugenics is basically the same as the fantasy, mainstream Jewish version, where it’s claimed that the Nazis herded defectives into buses and gassed them with diesel fumes (an impossibility) and then conducted all kinds of evil and weird medical experiments, eventually killing 6 million Jews in gas chambers and turning their remains into lampshades, soap and fertilizer. The conspiracy movement is kosher to the core, and does nothing but serve Jewish interests by pushing stupid gibberish such as this. They claim to be against the system, yet at the same time push the exact same narrative as the mainstream, except taking it even farther by claiming that Nazis are somehow still running the show.

Why the Nazis would promote anti-Nazi propaganda 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, while they are running things behind the scenes, is never explained. Also, if there’s a Nazi conspiracy, why the New World Order powers coalesced during World War II to absolutely destroy Nazi Germany is also never explained.

Fortunately, not many who follow alternative media are still dumb enough to believe that our enemies are actually Nazis, rather than Jews.

Eugenics….Are They Really Bad?

Like many other topics in today’s world, one is left scratching their head while studying eugenics and seeing the disconnect between what we are told and what actually is.

Eugenics was designed as a system for the betterment of society, the minimizing of suffering, the lowering of crime, and the strengthening of living standards for future generations, and is based upon objective science. Yet what we are led to believe in our post-WWII society is that it is nothing but a slippery slope to evil and genocide, and those who advance and promote it are seen as hate-crazed racists at worst and misguided at best. Reality has been inverted.

This seeming anomaly makes much more sense once you add in the Jew factor though, as what strengthens the White race – and eugenics surely would – is bad for Jews, and what weakens the White race – as dysgenics surely does – is good for Jews. This is a fact that simply can’t be denied by anyone with any intelligence who takes an objective look at Jewish behavior and how the world really works.

As far as Hitler and the National Socialists, the Jews had already absolutely destroyed their country and taken over many of its top institutions before Hitler had come to power, so conflict between the two was inevitable, and it was initially instigated by the Jews.

In the years leading up to 1933 the Jews had been using their media influence to divide and poison the minds of the Germans with anti-German and Marxist propaganda; they had been leading the Communist party which was trying to incite a violent revolution paralleling the Jewish Bolsheviks who took over Russia in 1917 and then brutally tortured, murdered and starved millions of the elites in the name of “equalizing” the Russian people; it was Jews who had disseminated the demoralizing propaganda and led the workers’ strikes on munition factories that caused Germany to lose World War I – a war that Hitler fought valiantly in from start to finish – and it was Jewish bankers who had plundered the German economy, causing hyper-inflation that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths of German civilians from starvation and suicide.

Hitler, like any honorable man, was wholeheartedly opposed to all of this, so he fought tooth and nail to defend his people and return his beloved nation to its former glory, free of the Jewish parasite that had proven itself to be hostile and disloyal to Germany and the German people.

Because of his open anti-Semitism, the Jews declared war on Germany as soon as Hitler took power, before any anti-Jewish policies had even been enacted. Hitler then began systematically passing laws to force the Jews out of positions of power and influence and he dismantled usurious Jewish banking houses such as the Rothschild dynasty and others. This obviously made the Jews feel very unwelcome – as it was meant to – and so they were leaving Germany in droves. Many went to America, and many went to Palestine and elsewhere.

Needless to say, this treatment was a great embarrassment for the Jews and caused them to develop a deep, burning hatred toward Germany and as a result they were – and still are – willing to make up any lie necessary to have the Third Reich, and its memory – and anyone else who would resist their tyranny – demonized and destroyed. The lies told about eugenics have little to nothing to do with the German-Jewish conflict of the 30s and 40s and, as we have seen, weren’t even invented until 20+ years after the end of the war. They are an outgrowth of the ongoing Jewish hatred of White gentiles, who they view as all potential Nazis that must be destroyed.

Historian and Eugenicist Lothrop Stoddard visited Hitler’s Germany in 1939 and reported on what he saw in the book Into the Darkness: Nazi Germany Today. In that book, he gives the reasons for Germany’s eugenics policies, and their aims, through firsthand knowledge:

When the Nazis came to power, Germany was biologically in a bad way. Much of her best stock had perished on the battlefields of the Great War. But those war losses were surpassed by others during the post-war period, due to the falling birth-rate. Economic depression, mass-unemployment, hopelessness for the future, had combined to produce a state of mind in which Germans were refusing to have children. The birth-rate dropped so fast that the nation was no longer reproducing itself. Furthermore, the lowest birth-rates were among those elements of highest social value. The learned and professional classes were having so few children that, at this rate, they would rapidly die out. At the other end of the scale, the opposite was true. Morons, criminals, and other anti-social elements were reproducing themselves at a rate nine times as great as that of the general population. And those lowest elements were favored in their breeding by the welfare measures of the Weimar regime. Statistics indicate that it cost far more to support Germany‟s defectives than it did to run the whole administrative side of Government—national, provincial, and local. As the Nazis saw it, they had a two-fold task: to increase both the size and the quality of the population. Indiscriminate incentives to big families would result largely in more criminals and morons. So they coupled their encouragements to sound citizens with a drastic curb on the defective elements.

To stand in opposition to the implementation of eugenics policies, such as those described above, is obviously insane, and literally suicidal for a nation. The only reason our society frowns upon eugenics is because our society is controlled by Jews, and as such the basis of our negative perception of the science is not driven by rationality – as most have no idea what it actually even is – it is driven by Jewish lies. Like everything that the Jews don’t like because it is good for Whites, they just claim it inevitably leads to lampshades and Holocausts, and is therefore off limits to even contemplate.

The main reason people don’t know what eugenics really is and are therefore unable to come to a rational opinion in regard to it, is because the other side of the debate over them is ruthlessly suppressed by the liberal Jew media, just as innumerable other big lies. Whatever is good for Whites and bad for Jews – from eugenics, all the way to the belief that White people should not be wiped off of the face of the planet – is simply shouted down as being “Nazi.”

Yes, if you simply care about the future of White children, you will be labeled a “Nazi.” You have to roll over and let your race perish to avoid that label. You have to let your race be degraded into a disgusting cesspool of fat Walmart shoppers that ride around in little carts so they don’t break their ankles trying to get at a tub of Ice Cream, and you must not object to having our borders wide open to hordes of violent subhumans who hate our guts and will slaughter every single one of us wholesale as soon as they’re given half a chance, if you want to avoid that label.

Therefore, unless you are on board with the White genocide program led by the Jews, being called a Nazi is clearly a compliment, and fighting to have every policy associated with Nazism implemented ASAP, virtually a sacred duty.

The logic in favor of eugenics requires only very basic, common sense. Not practicing it is insane and apocalyptic for any people, anywhere.

Are the Jews Right in Suppressing Eugenics?

Suppressing eugenics is clearly evil, but is this a logical strategy from the Jewish point of view?

It can be argued that it is. Eugenics is about rejuvenating the health of your nation, which can only be bad for Jews, since they function as parasites on the body of their host peoples.

Eugenics is rooted in science, and, excluding the leftist versions of it which ignore racial sub-groups and focus only on its IQ and hereditary disease aspects, it emphasizes the need to separate the races geographically due to their differing levels of achievement. The study of civilizations through a racial lens – a key factor in the foundation of racial eugenics – leads to the overwhelming historical evidence which shows that all great ones were built by White people, with the Nordic element at the forefront.

Madison Grant, the most famous early American anthropologist/eugenicist, in his highly influential 1916 book The Passing of the Great Race, characterized the Jew as one whose “dwarf stature, peculiar mentality, and ruthless concentration on self-interest are being engrafted upon the stock of the nation,” and warned against the dangers of race-mixing:

It must be borne in mind that the specializations which characterize the higher races are of relatively recent development, are highly unstable and when mixed with generalized or primitive characters, tend to disappear. Whether we like to admit it or not, the result of the mixture of two races, in the long run, gives us a race reverting to the more ancient, generalized and lower type. The cross between a white man and an Indian is an Indian; the cross between a white man and a negro is a negro; the cross between a white man and a Hindu is a Hindu; and the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew.

Thus we see that physical anthropology and race science, of which eugenics grew out of, also leads to the recognition of the Jews as a distinctive and separate race (actually a mixed race), which leaves no room for their trick of blending in by pretending they are White when it suits them and pretending they are just a religion when that suits them. That trick has served them very well, and indeed serves them very well to this day, with most White people having no clue what a Jew actually is, to the detriment of us all.

So yes, eugenics for Whites is bad for Jews, necessarily. Therefore, keeping in mind that they are our deadly racial enemy with separate interests and an entirely different value system, and indeed live off of us as parasites, then it becomes obvious that discouraging us from practicing eugenics is the logical way for them to behave.

Equally obvious, with the simple facts above in mind, is that the logical way for us to behave is to be unashamedly and unapologetically anti-Semitic and pro-eugenics, without fear of the Jews genocidal smear terms, because it is the right thing to do from our perspective.

Why is eugenics evil again? Oh yeah, lampshades and soap. We must feel guilty and give all our wealth and power to Jews and just roll over, rot, and die as a race, right?

Deliberate Genocide

What the Jews are doing to us by suppressing eugenics is conscious, deliberate, premeditated genocide, provably. First off, they are highly conscious of the fact that race-mixing is genocide, and always have been. Secondly, they are also conscious that low birth-rates lead to genocide. Eugenics takes both of these problematic issues into account, and seeks to rectify them.

All leading Jewish groups actively work toward preventing Jews from marrying outside of their race. Alan Dershowitz, one of the top Jewish leaders in America, even wrote an entire book about this, The Vanishing of the American Jew. For Israel, they regard a low Jewish birth-rate vs. a high Palestinian birth-rate as tantamount to Jewish genocide – and rightly so – and thus they are alarmed by and fight against that trend. Israel is, for all intents and purposes, a national socialist, eugenics state.

Meanwhile, they promote the opposite for Whites in White countries: race-mixing, multiculturalism, open borders, and dysgenics; and they brainwash our people into believing that national socialism, White race consciousness and eugenics are the ultimate in evil.

They cannot fallback on the excuse that they are just true-believing “liberals,” because there is ample evidence – stretching back thousands of years – that they are aware that what they are promoting inevitably leads to race destruction.

Therefore, they are guilty of White genocide, with malice aforethought, and it could be proven in court.

Let that sink in for a moment.

Ad encouraging Jews not to intermarry or miscegenate.

Running Out of White People

The President of the future United States in Idiocracy is a hilarious, Black professional wrestler/porn star named Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. A few years ago Mike Judge brought him back from the future for a series of webcasts, wherein he issued a dire warning in the form of the most politically incorrect statements I’ve ever seen coming from anyone who is anywhere near the mainstream.

Apparently, the future doesn’t run so smooth once White people have, for the most part, disappeared from the face of the earth, and this is a great concern for President Camacho.

Take heed, White man:

“Seeing as I’m from the future and I’ve seen it all, and I see how the shit came out. Listen. Y’all don’t need to worry about climate change. What you need to worry about is we running out of White people. We running out.

“Let me tell you something. In about 500 years. Y’all done went to bonkers. Y’all done got on planes, you flew to different places. The White Flight. There ain’t nowhere else to go! You done head out in the mountaintops, you done went underground. We, let me tell you something: there’s a White people shortage. That’s gonna happen.

“You White people been worrying so much about what’s in danger to spotted owls…the fucking…the fucking deer and the last bit of rabbit that’s running around, the jack rabbits. Can’t let us shoot the coyotes. And y’all didn’t realize yo ass was in danger. Check it out right now. Look, you used to be blonde, family was blonde, now you running around the family looking like…like…like Chico!

Let me tell you something. It’s all getting mixed together player. We all one family, come on out of hiding. Man, we got to save the White people, that’s why I have a 5% stake in the Washington Whiteskins. That’s right.”

“What I’m trying to say is: preserve yourself White people. You special. I’m getting choked up over this shit.”

“So, I came back, from the future, to let you know that this shit is happening. You’re running out of time.”