We’ve been saying forever that there will need to be a “year zero” for this revolution, because basically everything in history violates the current “universal morality” created by the “rules-based order.”

That year is going to need to be a lot later than 2008. You could definitely still make tranny jokes, for example, long after that in Hollywood productions. One of those Hangover sequels was one long tranny joke. The Hunger Games films show the bad guys as evil homosexuals. JK Rowling produced several films in the 2010s. I’m sure you can find lots of examples, but those come to mind.

Probably, “year zero” will eventually be in 2020, with everything before George Floyd and the Great Virus Understanding of Governmental Submission being markers of the dawn of a utopia. However, removing everything from before 2008 establishes the concept of a “year zero.” From there, moving the date will be easy.

Global News:

A school board west of Toronto is facing calls to be more transparent about the so-called “weeding” of its libraries amid concerns some books are being removed from collections solely because they were published before 2008.

Students who attend schools in the Peel District School Board say they’ve seen half-empty shelves at their libraries as the school year begins, with some popular fiction texts missing.

The board needs to provide a clear explanation on what has happened, the students say, and share details on how libraries with half-empty shelves will be replenished.

“I’m actually very concerned and I’m very confused,” Saisha Luciani, a 15-year-old student at a Mississauga, Ont., school in Peel Region, said in an interview Thursday.

“These books were resources for students like me to get into universities, to write essays, to do better in school.”

Not anymore, bitch.

Read that book by Kendi X. It’s the only text you need to get into a university.

This is a utopia.

We only know three truths:

• Black people are superior (gods among us), and the Jews are their protectors (because of the Holocaust)
• Everyone is gay and a tranny, and the Jews are their protectors (because of the Holocaust)
• Viruses are going to kill everyone if you don’t do everything The Science tells you to do, and the Jews are The Science (because of the Holocaust)

That’s it. That is the sum of all knowledge.

Everything else is white supremacy.

Ontario’s education minister asked the board this week to put an immediate stop to its weeding process _ which assesses and removes older books _ saying it was “illogical” to remove books from years past that educate students on history, antisemitism or are celebrated classics.

It was just a mistake, supposedly

The board has said older books, regardless of publication date, are allowed in schools if they are “accurate, relevant to the student population, inclusive, not harmful, and support the current curriculum.”

Luciani, other students and an advocacy group made up of concerned Peel school community members said it appears some texts have been removed just for being more than 15 years old, based on new board weeding guidelines that instruct librarians to carry out the process with an equity lens

Reina Takata, a Grade 10 student, said her school librarian recently informed students that books published before 2008 were no longer available since the board implemented its new weeding guidelines earlier this year.

“A lot of my favourite books are published before 2008 and if I don’t get a chance to read them, that’s pretty upsetting for me,” Takata said Thursday while standing outside her school in Mississauga.

“I noticed that ‘The Hunger Games’ is now gone. ‘Harry Potter’ series is gone…Now there are rows upon rows of empty shelves. Why wasn’t our opinion consulted as students?”

Because you’re evil. There is no consulting with evil. Evil must be stamped on with an iron boot.

Snake Baker contributed to this article.

We are rapidly reaching the point at which the heat starts to get hot.

When they give up on this artificial scarcity thing, and start compelling you to take it, it’s gonna turn into the Hunger Games.

Yahoo! News:

The U.S. is about to run out of adults who are ready and willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19, according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll.

The survey of 1,558 Americans 18 or older, which was conducted from April 27 to April 29, found that while the number who say they have already been vaccinated (57 percent) has continued to climb in recent weeks, just 6 percent now say they have not yet been vaccinated but plan to get a shot “as soon as it is available to me.”

That’s down from 35 percent in February and 17 percent earlier in April.

I don’t know who would believe these graphs, but here it is:

What they’re going to do now is turn on the never vaxxers and claim that they are holding back society.

Michigan’s Top Cunt has already set up a rewards system to compel people to compel others to get the vaxx.

“Today, I announced the #MIVaccToNormalChallenge, a pathway to gradually get back to normal as we hit our vaccination targets and push toward our goal of vaccinating 70% of Michiganders ages 16 and older. Please, sign up for your vaccine appointment today. Let’s get it done.” pic.twitter.com/q7e4l2zdNR

— Governor Gretchen Whitmer (@GovWhitmer) April 29, 2021

As we saw when Lord Fauci came for Joe Rogan, they now have some kind of internal logic via which even though the mask protects you from the virus, the unvaxxed are still dangerous.

You’re going to see white women and soy boys really start going nuts over this. That will be the first thing.

We the unvaxxable will be hunted down by these cunts as Fauci warns them in quiet tones that we want to hurt others.

I hope your slut girlfriend is on board with not getting sterilized.

And I hope that stupid bitch is good with a bow.

Thankfully for me, I’m an incel, so I’m just going to be throwing tiny knives and Chinese stars at people.

Here’s what I’m working with:

Yeah, now, see – this is what I was worried about when I heard about the military seizure of power in Burma.

Instead of stopping the rise of a Thai-style “resistance,” it triggered it.

They’re all out there doing the Hunger Games sign.

AP:

Hundreds of students and teachers took to Myanmar’s streets on Friday to demand the military hand power back to elected politicians, as resistance to a coup swelled with demonstrations in several parts of the country, even in the tightly controlled capital.

In the largest rallies since the takeover, protesters at two universities in Yangon flashed a three-fingered salute, a sign of resistance borrowed from “The Hunger Games” movies, that they adopted from anti-government protesters in neighboring Thailand. They chanted “Long live Mother Suu” — a reference to ousted leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been detained — and “We don’t want military dictatorship.”

“We will never be together with them,” lecturer Dr. Nwe Thazin said of the military at a protest at the Yangon University of Education. “We want that kind of government to collapse as soon as possible.”

Resistance has been gathering steam since the military declared Monday that it would take power for one year — a shocking setback for the Southeast Asian country that had been making significant, if uneven progress, toward democracy after decades of military rule. The opposition began with people banging pots and pans outside their windows in Yangon, the country’s largest city — under the cover of darkness each evening to avoid being targeted. But now people are beginning to take to the streets, including students and medical workers, some of whom are refusing to work.

Students have been central to previous protest movements against military dictatorship.

I know everyone is sick of me saying “I predicted this,” but no one is more sick of that than me.

However, when this military seizure of power was announced, I said: “I hope this isn’t a plan to trigger an uprising that wouldn’t have happened under the democracy system.”

I theorized that some Western intelligence could have provoked the military, which would then be designed to lead to a backlash against it, with all of these convenient “students” showing up to start making demands.

If I was the military, I would meet with Suu, and just tell her “okay, what kind of a deal can we make here.”

Because despite the hopes of authoritarian figures everywhere – who, obviously, I do tend to support – there is no way to stop a mob of “students” using force.

That’s what Russia is in the process of learning right now.

I wish that people would just literally read the Art of War, because Sun Tzu actually explained all of this nearly 3,000 years ago.

You have to have some kind of backing of the masses of people. You cannot simply rule through violence. I wish it did work, but it doesn’t, and it never has, ever.

And the problem is, when even if it is just a small group of people that is rising up, once you start to crack down on them, more people start to support them, because crackdowns are bad optics. So you end up triggering people who had previously supported you, or at least been apathetic towards you, into being against you.

It’s just… It’s not that complicated.

Well, frankly, if I’m honest: having women in public society does make it more complicated.

This currently new uprising in Myanmar is literally 100% women. It’s always 75-85% women, but this is literally 100%.

And yes, that does add a factor of complexity that Sun Tzu didn’t have to deal with.

But look: I’m not running a country. I’m just a guy with a website. Someone, somewhere, should have a group of people in a room, gaming this out.

I’m just going to tell you people right now: go to Suu, ask her what she wants, do the negotiations, and put her back in front fo the people. Because if you don’t do that, there is a machine with totally unlimited resources that will completely crush your country.

Suu isn’t some Alexi Navalny figure. She’s shown willingness to work with the military, and even completely destroyed her entire global reputation to defend getting rid of the Moslems. She’s a reasonable person. Tell her you’ll write a new Constitution that splits power between you and her, and doesn’t prevent her from being president like the previous Constitution did.

That is your only option. There is no other possible way out of this.

If you’re not going to do that, then shut off the internet, identify and arrest the leaders of the protests, and hope for the best. I don’t think that will work, but if you’re going to do anything other than get Mama Suu back in front, you have to shut the internet off right now.

Donald Sutherland wants to stir revolt. A real revolt. A youth-led uprising against injustice that will overturn the US as we know it and usher in a kinder, better way. “I hope that they will take action because it’s getting drastic in this country.” Drone strikes. Corporate tax dodging. Racism. The Keystone oil pipeline. Denying food stamps to “starving Americans”. It’s all going to pot. “It’s not right. It’s not right.”

Millennials need awakening from slumber. “You know the young people of this society have not moved in the last 30 years.” With the exception of Occupy, a minority movement, passivity reigns. “They have been consumed with telephones.” The voice hardens. “Tweeting.”

We are high up in a Four Seasons hotel overlooking Beverly Hills, sunlight glinting off mansions and boutiques below, an unlikely cradle of revolution. Sutherland, resplendent in a dark suit and red tie, is pushing 80. But he is quite serious about the call to arms. “We did it in ’68.”

The Canadian actor has a venerable record of leftwing activism dating back to support for the Black Panthers and opposition to the Vietnam war, but this latest foray into subversion dovetails with promoting The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, the second instalment in a series of four films based on Suzanne Collins’s bestselling novels for young adults. It takes forward the story of Katniss, played by Jennifer Lawrence, who must fight other oppressed proles to the death as part of a tyrannical government’s strategy of rule through fear. The dystopia, called Panem, is built on the ashes of the US, and Sutherland wants young audiences to respond to the allegory. “Hopefully they will see this film and the next film and the next film and then maybe organise. Stand up.”

It is a neat marketing pitch: go see the movie not to swell a Hollywood blockbuster’s box office but to fan a flame that will make the world a better place. Few stars could get away with that spiel, probably not even fellow liberal contemporaries such as Warren Beatty or Robert Redford. Sutherland, however, manages to sound sincere, even when insisting Hunger Games is not really a franchise since it’s based on a literary trilogy. It helps that he exudes charm and happily careens off-topic into eclectic anecdotes and observations: how the Guardian made him money, the night he ripped off a toenail on stage, the secret of a happy marriage and how some people are beyond redemption. Oh, and James Joyce, farting and masturbation. First, though, politics. In Hunger Games, Sutherland plays President Coriolanus Snow, a tyrant’s tyrant, with basilisk malevolence. Perched now on a sofa, long legs folded (he is 6ft 4in), the white mane just as magnificent as on screen, he is almost as intense when declaiming the films’ insurrectionary potential.

His own generation’s rebelliousness lapsed into bumper sticker slogans and today’s young are too fretful about finding jobs to change society, he laments. “I just think they’re not organised. It’s not something that’s happening in the universities, which is normally the breeding ground for that kind of activity.” Does he despair of the young? The famous drooping, pale blue eyes widen. “No, no, no. Otherwise there would be no point making this film. I have great hope and faith in them. I know because I talk to my children.” Which is just as well, because Hunger Games has made the 78-year-old something of a pin-up to a new generation unfamiliar with The Dirty Dozen, Kelly’s Heroes, Klute, Don’t Look Now or MASH, films that made him a star to their parents.

The Hunger Games, Sutherland suggests, is a coded commentary on inequality, power and hope. “It just puts things out in the light and lets you have a look at it. And if you take from it what I hope you will take from it, it will make you think a little more pungently about the political environment you live in and not be complacent.”

Four films spread over as many years can have a cumulative impact, he says. Young people may not revolt, he concedes, but they may effect profound change. “They might create a third party. They might change the electoral process, they might be able to take over the government, change the tax system.”

Sutherland’s belief in the power of film stems from a double-bill he watched in Toronto in 1954, aged 19: a state of bliss cast by Federico Fellini’s La Strada dissolved by Stanley Kubrick’s first world war drama Paths of Glory. “When I came out of that movie I was grabbing stones, pieces of gravel, anything, and throwing them at the street, so much was the rage at the injustice that I felt.”

One reason The Hunger Games has been so successful – the first film, directed by Gary Ross, made nearly three quarters of a billion dollars at the global box office – is that the allegory can be read multiple ways. A critique, for instance, of central government trampling states’ rights. Sutherland instead sees a critique of Tea Party-led excesses but he does note a parallel between his character and Barack Obama, whom he supports. “I think he realises, like Coriolanus Snow realises, that to exert authority and to control a situation it is necessary to make certain expedient decisions that you would not normally make. I don’t think it’s in his nature to send Predator drones. I thought it was in his nature to get out of Guantánamo, but people prevented that. It’s not been easy for him to govern, because this is a very racist society.”

Read More